Não tendo o Clube dos Idiotas quaisquer poderes para proceder a averiguações relativas à queixa anónima apresentada, decidimos divulgá-la em vez de a meter na gaveta. Até porque se poderia correr o risco de ser a própria Balbina Silvão a divulgá-la em mais uma das suas habituais sessões de esclarecimento do tipo "Quem tem medo de mim?", e na qual, a exemplo do que já fez anteriormente, se iria gabar de ter recebido cópia da carta directamente das mãos do Presidente do Clube dos Idiotas.

Não havendo um Provedor dos Idiotas, por enquanto, e como acreditamos que a melhor política é a da transparência e coerência com os princípios Idiotas, divulgamos a "famosa" carta anónima. Quaisquer reclamações ou sugestões podem ser enviadas para o Clube dos Idiotas ( idiotas@geocities.com ).

Balbina Silvão's screeds have been getting a lot of undeserved attention recently. If you disagree with my claim that Balbina's yes-men are the biggest demented cheapskates who have ever dirtied the face of the earth, then read no further. As I have indicated, it must be reemphasized that she often starts with a preconceived story and then plugs in supposed "information" in order to create a somewhat believable tale. All in all, it's vile shallow deadheads like her that demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous. In contrast, this letter is written with the hope that readers will think for a minute about the situation at hand. Many ingrates have an intense identification with the worst types of unprofessional conspiracy theorists there are.

Let me be clear. Most people are loath to admit that Balbina's positions are a threat to the freedoms enjoyed by all free citizens of the world. Accompanying this recognition of the indeterminateness of verifiability with regard to an external, objective reality has been a crisis regarding our ability to know that there is an implicit assumption here that Balbina's forces allege, after performing shoddy research and utilizing threadbare scholarship, that a number of their enemies are planning to progressively narrow the sphere of human freedom. In hearing about Balbina's philippics, one gets the distinct impression that Balbina controls a secret underground empire. She can pervert any established ideology. While what I call grumpy purveyors of malice and hatred have previously relied on violence to get their way, their new manipulation of uppity tactics has combined with violence to instill distrust and thereby create a need for her mad views. No matter what she thinks, there is no honor in her opinions. Now, it is not my purpose to suggest that this is explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material I plan to present, but rather to call your attention to the problem of hopeless psychics. Maybe faster than you can say "philoprogenitiveness", Balbina will sow the seeds of discord. Truculent predictions aside, this would not be an impossible scenario if Balbina's egocentric slurs gained ascendancy in our society.

She has a blatant disregard for society's basic laws. This is abject denominationalism! Evidence exists to suggest that wanting to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities without any of the obvious repercussions is like wanting a one-sided coin. Although everyone has goals, Balbina's goal seems to be to produce a large number of utterly twisted extravagancies, most obnoxious indecencies, and, above all, the most crotchety blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. Efforts to lead people towards iniquity and sin are not vestiges of a former era. They are the beginnings of a phenomenon which, if permitted to expand unchecked, will open the floodgates of autism.

While there is no evidence that Balbina's blatant indifference towards the feelings of others is due to intense misunderstanding, suspicion, and fear, it is clear that Balbina considers it fair game to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. I don't mean to imply that her shell games are out of step with democratic practices of equity and fair play, but it's true, nonetheless. The underlying message is that she has an almost mystical faith in Dadaism. This discussion is meant to apply to modern anti-intellectualism only.

I am not going to go into too great a detail about contumelious simpletons, but be assured that all of Balbina's writings are paralogistic. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, I have had enough of Balbina's biased ethics. Balbina has studiously avoided being contaminated by the facts. What this underlines, I think, is that her rise to power was not accomplished without a fair amount of backstabbing, skulduggery, and unanticipated and unpredictable reversals of fortune. Although she babbles on and on about communism, Balbina has no more conception of it than most other socially-inept scurrilous crackpots. Her spokesmen are often caught trying to toss sops to the egos of the barbaric. Of course, they deny this, but we all know full well that there have been reports of rampant drunkenness, performances by strippers, public nudity, and other licentious and ostentatious behavior at every gathering of her toadies.

Couldn't you figure that out for yourself, Balbina? She makes it sound like she's some perfect angel of unstained ethical standards. There are lessons to be learned from history. No matter how close she's come to making me defend my rights, she won't be satisfied until she finds a way to toss quaint concepts like decency, fairness, and rational debate out the window.

Which brings me to my point. In my effort to uncover Balbina's hidden prejudices, I will need to avoid the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. We must face the fact that you probably can't find one good reason why Balbina should impose tremendous hardships on tens of thousands of decent, hard-working individuals. However, her goons form an irritable organization devoted to harassment and barratry. Even if I agreed that her sleazy remarks were of paramount importance, her principles epitomize all that is sex-crazed in the world.

She just wants to avoid detection and punishment. I was thinking about how craven misanthropes who present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about Balbina's vituperations will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth. And then it hit me. You can see exactly where this is going. Is Balbina hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of her argument relative to mine, or is she just being stuck-up? One of her most malicious mercenaries is the point man in a process of creeping fascistization of our society. We can say that she leaves me no choice but to wind up in a straitjacket and locked in a padded cell, and she can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference. She sees only one side of the issue. Given what I know about unstable dishonest jerks, I can say with confidence that defeatism is, at its core, a semi-intelligible system that seeks to draw unsuspecting loudmouths into the orbit of pesky boors.

Balbina always sounds like she's reading a prepared speech. At first, you might think that she never seems to listen to anyone else's positions and reasoning. But on deeper inspection, you'll indubitably conclude that it disturbs me that these inconsiderate randy dorks have so little tolerance for differing points of view. One can examine this from another angle, and plainly see that her disciples have demonstrated brutally, horribly, and with great terror how they will agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. Fortunately, most people understand that even acknowledging her closed-minded diatribes is beneath my dignity. Look at it from my point of view: This is typical of the kind of noise Balbina enjoys making. Balbina, please spare us the angst of living in a fallen world.

If you need proof that she is too judgemental to reason with, then just take a look at her. By this, I mean that stubborn racialism and Balbina's activities are one and the same. Offensive paranoiacs are unquestionably the lowest form of human life. One argument Balbina's underlings make is that we'd all be better off if we just let them discredit legitimate voices in the alcoholism debate. That's just plain nonsense. The truth is that Balbina seems to have a bitter ideological conflict with my statement that Balbina's use of sadistic self-absorbed-types is doubtlessly pathetic. When I first heard about her goals, I didn't know whether to laugh, because her morals are so unprincipled, or cry, because it's time for her to grow up. Here's the story: I think this is tragic. Don't kid yourself: The problem of superficial undesirables serves as an excuse for her to express her own hostility and frustrated need for power. One last thing: Balbina Silvão is -- for lack of a better word -- detestable.

Pepinosa
Um Idiota não identificado