Conservation groups have renewed calls for the return of the spring black bear hunt.
The move comes after an Ontario woman was killed by a black bear in a provincial park on Tuesday.
The
Northwestern Ontario Sportsmen's Alliance and the Canadian Outdoor
Heritage Alliance said the spring hunt would help manage the number of
black bears. Without the hunt, bears no longer fear humans and consider
people part of their "wilderness buffet." RELATED STORY: Black bear kills woman camper north of Chapleau, Ont. A
spokesperson for Ontario's Ministry of Natural Resources said she
doesn't believe a spring bear hunt would have made a difference in this
incident.
Jolanta Kowalski said the hunt is not going to help with a predatory bear.(She's
right! Returning the hunt now, would not have saved this woman., but
it will save the life of the next man/woman/child that might be mauled
to death by a predatory bear forced out of his area by a larger bear.
Unfortunately, capturing bears, and relocating them, only results in a
bear fight someplace else. There are so many bears in the bush now, all
the prime feeding areas have been claimed by large boars, forcing the
smaller ones out. Cubs, not belonging to the 'dominant boar' are killed
and eaten, thereby making way for the dominant boars genetic offspring.
Hundreds of more cubs are being killed now then there ever were, and
bears are being seen and killed or captured in areas that haven't had
bears in over a hundred years. Yet, still the politically driven,
catering to the city folks who think all bears are 'Whinny the Pooh',
say Ontario does not have a bear problem. When in fact, Downtown
Toronto does not have a bear problem. I would invite any of them to
take an evening walk in the bush around the Huntsville/Gravenhurst
area ! That'll scare the Pooh out of them!)
Bear kills one in Canada, injures another
CHAPLEAU, Ontario, Sept. 7 (UPI) -- Wildlife officials in Canada are on
the lookout Wednesday for a wounded black bear after it attacked a
couple in a park, killing one of them. The Toronto Star reports Dr.
Jacqueline Perry was killed while Marc Jordan is in serious but stable
condition in a Sudbury, Canada, hospital after the bear attacked them.
The two were in their campsite at Missinaibi Lake Provincial Park near
Chapleau. Jordan managed to stab the bear as it was attacking Perry.
This is the latest in a season full of bear-human confrontations in the
area. Later Wednesday two men were able to scare a bear away from them.
Police Constable Karen Farand said the lack of blueberries this season
is forcing bears to forage for food elsewhere.(You've seen the signs on the side of the road that advertise "Wild" blueberries! Yup!
It's those damn 'blueberries' again, just how frigging Wild are they?
.. The government should do something about the great northern
blueberry shortage that seems to be killing people by proxy!
Ignore the hundred and hundreds bears in the area that have survived
because of the political cancellation of a hunt that has controlled
their numbers for years. Ignore the fact that there is not one shred of
scientific proof the hunt was detrimental to the ecology, or the
survival of the species in general. Ignore the people that are directly
affected by this phoney 'save the bears' policy, and pander only to the
many more votes in the big cities, where people base there vast
knowledge of bears on Whinny the Pooh books, and Disney movies. I
wonder which is worse? the Bear problem, or the growing threat of
'stupid' city politicians)
|
Liberal Thinking: Death or injury to those who can't use martial arts or other non-lethal means of self-defense-- The young, the old, the infirm, the disabled, the weak, the small, and the pregnant--are simply the necessary sacrifice we must make to criminals, to avoid the risks of letting honest, law abiding people be armed. FIREARMS QUICK FACTS By Garry Breitkreuz, MP – Updated April 29, 2005
Here's what THOSE Officers say about this Gun Registry Farce
| |||||||||||||||||
|
Liberals have forgotten about average Canadians While Liberals have fiddled, essential programs such as health care has crumbled; crime and the proliferation of guns are at an all-time high; taxes continue to rise; education and the environment are being destroyed and Canada's relationship with its next door neighbour and biggest trading partner has deteriorated. "The fact is, this government has failed at every major initiative," he said. The Liberals have: wasted billions of dollars on an inept long-gun registry; a recently introduced child care program will only create more government bureaucracy instead of helping children and families; repeatedly broken their promises such as repealing the GST; and more egregiously the Liberals have been caught red handed in a corruption scandal. "No wonder people are dis-interested in politics," he said. In the process, the Liberals have labeled the Conservatives with a "hidden agenda" and placed a Darth Vader helmet on the head of the party's leader Stephen Harper." "They say we are bad for Canada, scary and out of sync," he said. "They have vilified us Conservatives." Yet it has been the Liberals who have abused Canadians' trust and ignored their needs, he said.(If Harper is characterized as Darth Vader, it's only fitting that Martin be shown as the Fagan he is. As the beleaguered taxpayers beg for more of their money back from the thieving liberals, Martin Shouts "MORE? You want MORE?" All the time telling you how increased punishment for criminals is no deterrent, and any reduction in the gas tax in meaningless, even the fraudulent 1.5 cent a litre tax they levied to fight the long gone deficit. The taxes just disappear into liberal friendly pockets, and punishment for crimes, may just come back and bite the liberals in their thieving collective asses. You want change? You have to VOTE for change, and THAT starts by kicking these bastards out at the first opportunity.) Waste of money Ten years after the federal Liberals introduced their now-infamous gun registry, pretty much everything that opponents predicted could go wrong has gone wrong. As the critics warned at the time, costs have exploded. A program originally supposed to be self-sustaining financially after a modest upfront investment has now cost taxpayers at least $1 billion and perhaps as much as $2 billion. Imagine what even a fraction of that amount could have done to boost the number of police on the streets who have to deal with all the gun crime in this country, which was supposed to be prevented by this useless registry! As the Sun's Maria McClintock notes in her two-part feature reviewing the registry, ending today, its runaway costs were condemned in 2002 by Auditor General Sheila Fraser. Fraser added that even worse than the misspending was that these cost overruns were hidden from Parliament - and thus, from taxpayers. And as we've all seen - and as the critics predicted - the registry has failed as an effective tool in combatting urban street crime, which was how the Liberals sold it to Canadians. (Seeing that the Auditor Generals report on the gun registry is due about the same time as the Gomery report, I wonder what the liberals have up their sleeves to put put a stop to this 'coincidence'? I personally think they will engineer a way to create an election, while for some ungodly reason their still up in the polls, and find a way to blame it on the conservatives. Remember, a 'Martin' is just another form of Weasel!) One Man's Opinion - Crime This issue hits the Liberals where it hurts because any “get-tough-on-crime” stance that they adopt will only prompt the question “And just where have you been for the last 12 years?” Taking police off the streets and cash out of our pockets for this counter-productive Gun Registry? Taking an incredibly soft approach on the escalating marijuana trade that’s linked to organized crime, giving young people the impression that they’re immune from severe punishments – and look at the decisions of our courts! The Liberals have had 12 years to try to turn the tide. Their failure will prompt many to want to hear the Harper plan.(And the liberal plan of course is to buy basketballs for the gettos, and continue hassling duck hunters..) Canada Blames Us Gun-control folly here, up north, across the pond... If you have a problem, it's often easier to blame someone else rather than deal with it. And with Canada's murder rate rising 12 percent last year and a recent rash of murders by gangs in Toronto and other cities, it's understandable that Canadian politicians want a scapegoat. That at least was the strategy Canada's premiers took when they met last Thursday with the new U.S. ambassador to Canada, David Wilkins, and spent much of their time blaming their crime problems on guns smuggled in from the United States. Of course, there is a minor problem with the attacks on the U.S. Canadians really don't know what the facts are, and the reason is simple: Despite billions of dollars spent on the Canada's gun-registration program and the program's inability to solve crime, the government does not how many crime-guns were seized in Canada, let alone where those guns came from. Many things affect crime: The rise of drug-gang violence in Canada and Britain is an important part of the story, just as it has long been important in explaining the U.S.'s rates. (Few Canadians appreciate that 70 percent of American murders take place in just 3.5 percent of our counties, and that a large percentage of those are drug-gang related.) Just as these gangs can smuggle drugs into the country, they can smuggle in weapons to defend their turf. With Canada's reported violent-crime rate of 963 per 100,000 in 2003, a rate about twice the U.S.'s (which is 475), Canada's politicians are understandably nervous. While it is always easier to blame another for your problems, the solution to crime is often homegrown.(liberals have always taken the easy, political route to problem solving, and they depend largely on the ignorance of the general population to get their follies into law. Unfortunately for the growing number of victims, they are usually successful in their pandering to the ignorant. Banning guns sounds like a 'great' idea. The only problem is, the only guns it affects are the one YOU need to protect yourself from the criminal that will ALWAYS have access to guns. Canadians live in a liberal dominated country, where it is much more acceptable, for your daughter to be raped and murdered, that it is for her to defend herself, and possibly kill her attacker. A young girl walking home alone at midnight was abducted in Ottawa, people reported hearing screams, and body found yesterday may very well be hers. A simple can of mace in her purse may have all been all that was needed to save her. (If it only saves one life eh!) But, had the police discovered her with such a prohibited weapon, she would have been a victim of our 'Just-Us' system, and fined for daring to protect herself. WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE??? The ONLY way you are ever going to see things change, is to grow some balls, and VOTE for change. As long as the Liberals remain in power, NOTHING WILL CHANGE and it's YOUR fault.) Bears become ‘pain in the butt' Ministry has tough time responding to dozens of bear calls Marcel Jodouin, 71, used to take a ride up to the Papineau Cameron Township dump to see the black bears, just out of curiosity. He doesn't have to anymore — now they come visit him and it's getting on his nerves. Jodouin said the provincial strategy of trap-and-relocate is flawed because it merely foists the problem on some other township and he would prefer to see the spring bear hunt returned to keep the population in check. "They're getting to be a pain in the butt," Jodouin told The Nugget Monday evening as he described days of frustration waiting for help and grandchildren too scared to ride ATVs on his five-hectare property. More than a dozen bears have been trapped and relocated from the area this fall, and an anonymous comment from one area citizen suggest at least a dozen more have been shot by residents. Powassan OPP also had bears on their radar, with a big one allegedly "running at large" in the McCarthy Street area of Trout Creek. North Bay OPP responded to a call in Bonfield after someone hit a cub on Highway 531. Jeff Fabian, one of two MNR bear management technicians, told The Nugget Thursday he was heading into Mattawa to deal with a long list of complaints. Fabian said they trapped and removed 17 bears so far this year, with Mattawa and Trout Creek the most notable hotspots. Jodouin figures that number is likely up over 20 now after seeing a 160-kilogram (350-pound) bear in a trap off Donald Street Sunday and hearing about another one caught east of Mattawa Monday morning. He also said a bow hunter dropped by wanting to weigh a massive bruin hunted in the township, but Jodouin said his scales were set up too close to the ground to even try. "It was seven feet long . . . the size of the head was unreal, the paws must have been 12 inches wide," he said. After the hunter found some scales that could do the job, Jodouin said he was told "it was 600 pounds gutted." Jodouin said Fabian showed up Monday and apologized for the delay, showing him a pile of MNR complaint forms he's been trying to deal with. As of Monday night, a trap was set up within sight of his home and he's brought the dog in for the night. "It's not that guy's fault," Jodouin said, referring to the MNR bear technician, "and they're getting them." But Jodouin said the MNR employees are outnumbered, with dozens of bears seen at the dump at the same time six or more are being seen in town. (Gee!! If only there were more 'berries' in the bush the bears would never be seen! Well, at least 'that's' what the bear experts in downtown Toronto are telling us.. They must have lots of berries, because it's highly doubtful if even one of them has even 'seen' a bear in the wild! It's only a mater of time, the first to get eaten is garbage and bird feeders, then pets, then kids.. Remember, It's not the thousands and thousands of bears not being culled by the cancelled spring bear hunt, it's the 'lack of berries in the bush'! I wonder where all the berries have gone? It couldn't be that they are being eaten by thousands and thousands of bears not culled by the cancelled spring bear hunt? In the mean time, keep a rifle handy, your back door is a very flimsy obstacle to a hungry bear) Calls for return of spring bear hunt after woman killed Going after law abiding citizens Ever since the recent outbreak of gun violence in Toronto, the Toronto Police Force, the City of Toronto and the provincial government have started to get tough. Unfortunately, while the gangbangers are shooting it out almost unimpeded, the police and politicos have decided to get tough with the law abiding citizens of Toronto. Going after the good guys in Toronto started when Mayor David Miller came up with perhaps one of the silliest suggestions that has ever been made by any Toronto mayor; quite an accomplishment considering that Mel Lastman once held occupied that office. Miller stated that no one in Toronto needs a gun so they should all be stored in one central facility. The fact that thugs could break into such a facility and steal enough weapons to supply an army (a real army, not what Canada calls one) ever occurred to the left’s extremely fair haired boy. The most egregious example of going after people who have not broken the law occurred when Toronto Police Sgt. Rob Hargan openly bragged to the media about how he seized a young person’s t shirt. The offending shirt had a picture of a handgun and was accompanied by the words, "Rule no. 1 — be armed". As disgusting as the t shirt might be, it is not illegal. The cop was not only proud about seizing the lawful property of a Toronto resident but he threatened that anyone seen wearing such a shirt would be "hassled" by the police. Someone in Chief Billy Blair’s force noticed that this would be a tad illegal and publicly backtracked. We don’t know anything about the person who was wearing the shirt but it’s a good bet he wasn’t black. Stopping and seizing legal property from a young black male would be racial profiling.(Miller 'The Red' is a typical 'socially educated by television' city boy, that wouldn't know cow shit if he ate it for breakfast. He also made the inane statement that the only reason anyone would have a handgun was to commit a crime, thereby insulting millions of sports shooters right across Canada. As for the T- Shirt! I happen to believe what it said was true, and so should EVERY person that runs a convenience store in Toronto. If 'they' adhered to 'Rule #1' there would be a hell of a lot less of them getting robbed and killed. Miller is going to be a 'one term' mayor because if this guy was anymore left wing, he'd be flying in circles so tight he would vanish up his own asshole!) Another big gun headache Canadians must be so deadened to the bureaucratic nightmare that is the federal long gun registry that any new piece of news about the program’s failures barely qualifies as news. However, western Manitobans and other rural Canadians who understand this ill-conceived program has always been and will always be a colossal waste of time and money can only shake their heads again as the Canada Firearms Centre and the Liberal government tried to pull another fast one on us. First passed in 1995 in response to public pressure in Ontario and Quebec about escalating gun violence — including the 1989 shooting of 13 women at a polytechnical college in Montreal — the long gun registry has been a source of anger, confusion and rage among the vast majority of Canada’s gun owners. We were first told the program would cost $2 million once the Canada Firearms Centre recouped registration fees — which always seemed like a blatant cash grab — from gun owners. When Auditor-General Sheila Fraser released her report on the mess in 2002, she estimated the true cost had grown to $1 billion. Two years later, CBC unearthed documents through the Freedom of Information Act that showed the price tag had actually doubled to $2 billion. To its credit, the Liberal government made an after-the-fact attempt to rein in costs by capping the registry’s annual budget at $25 million and waiving the registration fees gun owners were forced to pay. It was a needed admission of error, but at the same time it doesn’t make up for the fact the Liberals have wasted $2 billion — an amount that could have built 33 additions to the Brandon Regional Health Centre — on a program that has never lived up to its lofty expectations as a way of curbing crime. Look no further than the waves of shootings in Toronto to see that making hunters register guns does nothing to curb urban gun violence. No change short of scrapping the registry altogether will make western Manitobans and Canadians happy about it.(It 'must' be working!! After, Attacks in Downtown Toronto by hordes of duck hunters has remained at 'Zero' for a few hundred years now! And now that ropes have replaced firearms for hundreds and hundreds of suicides, the Liberals (and Wendy) can accurately crow about a drastic drop in gun deaths since C-68 was foisted upon us! Isn't that wonderful! All this 'safety(?)' and only One Billion, Nine hundred and Ninety Eight Million over budget! ) Canadians About to get 'Serviced' Again! Service Canada has begun operating as a stand-alone agency inside government, but has yet to announce its new identity or advertise the range of services. It will be launched next week or the week after, government officials said. "I think it will go a long way to helping rebuild the level of trust that [Canadians] have in government, if we get the front-line services right," Ms. Stronach said. "It may not be perfect, but our aim is to do much better than we have been doing." The civil-service critics, however, insist it has already become a monster department, the heir to the giant department that Prime Minister Paul Martin split in two when he took office 20 months ago, creating Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Social Development Canada. Some critics deride its "executive head," Maryantonett Flumian, because she headed the famously over-budget gun registry. Defenders say Ms. Flumian was brought in to fix it after it went wrong, and is an innovator.(I'm not saying that this might not be a bad 'idea' but it's being run by Liberals and their standard bureaucrats, headed up by the the ex leader of the 'gun registry' for a 'turncoat' minister that has absolutely no regard for the people that voted her into parliament as a MP in the first place.. As for "Service"? Any farmer can tell you what 'that' means, and the Liberals have been doing it to us for 12 years. Even bullet riddled Toronto might be looking forward to the next election just to get these liars and thieves away from the country's cash drawer!) Another gun registry delay: Ottawa defers regulations for police, gun-makers. In what has become a familiar refrain, the Canada Firearms Centre has once again quietly put off several gun regulations that were supposed to take effect this month. Among the measures delayed until next year is a provision to have police forces across Canada register all their weapons - including seized guns - with the federal agency. New rules governing gun shows have been deferred until November 2006, while regulations that would force gun-makers to identify all firearms with internationally recognized markings won't come into force until the end of 2007.(A billion dollars wasted. and it's STILL a useless, ineffective mess. It was a farce to begin with, and it will be a farce right to the very end, when the conservative government finally puts it out of it's misery, and re-directs the much needed funds to where they will really do some good. No one should know better how useless this duck hunter registry is, than the people of bullet ridden Toronto..Tired of running for cover every time you hear a backfire, or any other loud sudden noise? A billion dollars could have stopped a lot of guns, drugs, and criminals, if only the Liberals thought 'that' was more important than pandering to people like Wendy Cukier and the other paranoids that think 'all' guns are owned by criminals, and if they could only disarm the law abiding all would be well.. How safe do YOU feel now Toronto? ) How many do guns defend? Joyce Cordoba, 46, stood behind the deli counter while working at a Wal-Mart in Albuquerque, N.M. Suddenly, her ex-husband -- against whom Mrs. Cordoba had a restraining order -- showed up, jumped over the deli counter, and began stabbing her. Due Moore, a 72-year-old Wal-Mart customer, witnessed the violent attack. Mr. Moore, legally permitted to carry a concealed weapon, pulled out his gun and shot and killed the former husband. Mrs. Cordoba survived the brutal attack and is recovering from her wounds. This raises a question. How often do Americans use guns for defensive purposes? In 2003, we know 12,548 people died through nonsuicide gun violence, including homicides, accidents and cases of undetermined intent. University of California-Los Angeles professor emeritus James Q. Wilson, a respected expert on crime, police practices and guns, says: "We know from Census Bureau surveys that something beyond a 100,000 uses of guns for self-defense occur every year. We know from smaller surveys of a commercial nature that the number may be as high 2.5 million or 3 million. We don't know what the right number is, but whatever the right number is, it's not a trivial number."(If you listen to paranoid flakes from the Canadian Coalition for gun control, (and you know who I mean) You would think that the only time a gun is used in this country, is by the 'odd' duck hunter (and they really think duck hunters are odd!), and of course the gang banger blowing away a rival. The Mauser studies show 67,000 Canadian 'reported' used of a firearm for defence. About half from 4 legged vicious animals, and the other half from two legged vicious animals. So, if out of those 33,500 'reported' uses of a firearm in defence against a 'human' attacker, only 1 in 10 uses actually saved life, then 3,350 lives have been saved. Keeping in mind, the vast majority of defensive uses only required the firearm to be seen by the attacker, and not actually firing a shot or injuring anyone. In those cases even the attackers life was saved. Also, and more so then in the U.S.A., many of the defensive uses go unreported. Past history has shown, anyone in Canada, pulling out the old shotgun to scare off a would be intruder, would probably not call the police and report the incident for fear of being charged for everything from having an unregistered shotgun (The majority ARE still unregistered, and will remain that way), to unsafe storage (If you can retrieve it and load it fast enough to save a life, then the police will figure it probably wasn't stored securely), At which point, the police will ask for a search warrant, and tear your home apart looking for more things to charge you with. If the shotgun 'was' registered, you can now count on the police removing ALL of your firearms in case you have 'defend' yourself again. If you defend yourself, first in your home against the intruder, you will then have to defend yourself in the courts against the government. In Canada, it's more politically correct, and financially less ruining, to simply be killed by the intruder. THIS IS WHY YOU DON'T HEAR OF PEOPLE DEFENDING THEMSELVES WITH GUNS IN THIS COUNTRY. What's WRONG with this picture? Canadians are 'liberally' groomed victims, living in a culture of defencelessness. And, until this changes, the criminals will always be in control of your life! THAT, you can count on!) Raise Minimum Sentences Finally, a politician who seems to be on the right track when it comes to cracking down on gun crime in Canada. Surprisingly enough the bright idea comes from a New Democrat, and regular readers will know that we don't often agree with what the lefties have to say. But Manitoba Attorney General Gord Mackintosh hit the nail on the head when he demanded that the feds get tough with people convicted of smuggling guns into Canada. That, we suggest, would do much more to help rid the streets of illegal weapons than the disgraced gun registry program will ever achieve. It's a safe bet that the majority of gun violence is perpetrated by career criminals, not by farmers and hunters who have suddenly run amok with their rifles. And we suspect that the bikers and gangsters and drug dealers who pack weapons as part of their nefarious lifestyles aren't lining up at the local outdoor store to buy their firearms and ammo. (Finally a politician ? Where the hell have you guys been? The Conservatives have been saying this for years? But, I guess it's only 'news' when spouted by the 'Left' Eh!) Ontario to Blitz Gun shops In an effort to stem a recent rash of gun violence in Toronto, the Ontario government announced it will begin conducting sweeps of gun shops to help reduce the number of illegal guns in the city. "[We want] to ensure that we have safe standards in place," said the province's Attorney-General Michael Bryant at a press conference in Toronto Thursday. However, Mr. Bryant said the sweep will be limited to businesses and not individual homes, as that is the purview of the federal government and the gun registry.(Another absolutely useless, knee jerk, liberal response to the "please do something" plea from Toronto citizens. It's ironic, that the very few 'gun shop' robberies that 'have' occurred in Ontario, resulted in the deaths of gun shop employees! Why? Because although being surrounded by firearms, they were unable to defend themselves, or prevent firearms from being stolen. Why? Because Liberals think that allowing them to be armed for there own, and general citizen protection, is not politically correct. It's better that they die and let the guns be stolen and used to kill others it would seem, then defend themselves by drawing a 'gasp!!!' holstered pistol! Canada, and Urban Ontario in particular, is populated by carefully, socially, cultivated victims, living in a culture of defencelessness. No wonder gun toting criminals always have the upper hand. Want things to change? Do you want to see criminals actually going to jail, and not summer camp? Are you fed up of wondering if YOU or your children will be the next victim in the crossfire? Then for Christ sake, find your self a pair of balls, and vote these Liberal Leeches out of office. Because until their gone, there will be no changes to our liberal 'Just-Us' system, and the gunfire, and death will continue. The time is for ACTION, not group hugs, and hand wringing. The liberals have done NOTHING to curb crime in their entire 12 years in office, but they have certainly spread a lot of your tax dollars around, amongst their friends and supporters. The two billion wasted on a registry of 'duck hunters' is only the 'tip' of the liberal iceberg!) So Much For Gun Control! Anne McLellan declared that "I'm very concerned about the whole question of gun violence and about the whole question of gun smuggling." Great. Although she immediately blunted the impact of those remarks by insisting that "we have no evidence that there are more guns being smuggled into the country than ever before." Well, there's only one of two choices here, and neither one reflects terribly well on current Liberal crime policies. Either these guns are getting into the country through the United States or from other countries through our ports of entry and the federal government's customs agents are not able to prevent it, or these guns are, in fact, originating from here in Canada and the $2-billion boondoggle of a gun registry is - surprise, surprise! - not stopping criminal from using guns. Back in late 1994, when then-justice minister Allan Rock first unveiled the gun-control program, he declared, "This tough new gun-control program will improve public safety and also send a strong message that the criminal misuse of guns will not be tolerated." Eleven years later, the Liberals are suddenly worried about gun crime because Toronto has been blitzed by gun violence. In a more sane country, Toronto would realize that the gun registry has been exposed as an expensive waste of money and would punish the Liberals for lying to them by voting them out. And the Grits would shut down their useless registry and put the money into actual police officers fighting crime. (As Torontonians run for cover, the Liberals tell them 'crime is down'! Of course it's down! Down Town that is! It's a hell of a good job they spent that billion or two ridding Toronto streets of 'duck hunters' instead of foolishly wasting it on crap like border security, and more police officers patrolling major city streets Etc. After all, everybody knows it's those damn 'hip-hop' duck hunters causing all the problems, and the sooner all legitimate, and legally obtained firearms and their owners are scrutinized, tracked and punished, the sooner crime will come to an end in Toronto streets. Well, according to the liberals anyway!) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||