PAGINA PRINCIPAL | INDEX | FREEMAN | MORMON APOSTASY | TEMPORARY DOC. | POOR AND NEEDFUL | EQUALITY | PRIVATE PROPERTY | CONSECRATION | TITHES | HIRELING SHEPHERDS | BISHOPS | CONCLUSIONS | PRIESTHOOD DOC. | CALLINGS | ORDINANCES | PREACH | TEMPLES | COMMANDS DOC. | SCRIPTURES | WORD OF WISDOM | SACRAMENT | ZION´S CONSTRUCTION  | ABOUT THE DEATH OF JOSEPH SMITH | ALL IS WELL IN ZION | FINAL SYNTHESIS | e-mail | Reading without connection | Spanish text

APOSTASY


 
 

One of the things that should clarify before entering in the main accusation is the definition of this expression that is not very well-known but like we will see the understanding of the concept that it implies then it can end up being the key to understand the problem clearly to which we are faced. The word in question is Apostasy. 


 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

It is not common the use of this term. We usually learn how to use this word, when we have relationship with some religion. Their meaning be probably ignored, because where it has been used and it is continued using the term almost with exclusivity it is in religious environments. There it is where it is used to express the condition or the state of who abandons a religion, be to pass to other or to none.

We will see that this use of the word " Apostasy " that give it the Christian religions doesn't have relationship with the biblical concept. That the application that gives it the sacred text is referred to the context of a people and not that of individuals. That it is directed to the leaders and corrupt shepherds of the Christendom and not indiscriminately to any human that is in the process of necessary changes in the search of the Truth.

We will see that is alter this term with the objective of accusing victims of the crime that make the delinquent; to subject the man and it doesn't to illuminate it. All this constitutes another symptom more than the Apostasy that suffers the Christianity,

We will see the importance that has to understand this concept to be able to understand other things. We will discover that, although the word is ignored, the concept " apostasy " is of utility to be able to understand facts and the man's behaviors in any land of the human activity.

It will be easy to see in daily attitudes, in facts common of the life, and along the whole human history, the relationships and mainly the too near relationship that it exists between " apostasy " and the concepts of Corruption and Adulteration of the Truth. That it is not only limited to the environment of the spiritual doctrines, but rather, understanding and leaving of the correct concept, we will be able to see that I lower the surface of apparent normal behaviors, it hides a very human inconducta, characteristic of the culture of this planet and closely bound and taken root with the percentage of acceptable corruption, that is to say, with the lie dose and adulteration of the truth that we allow ourselves to have and to tolerate. This is the measure and the percentage that we decree and we admit as indispensable minimum to act in the life according to our earthly way of to see and to understand all things.
 
 



















To apostatize according to the optics of the dictionary (Spanish), and according to the version and the pattern that we take, it would mean:
 
 
 

APOSTASY 

To deny the faith. Deviation of the original faith. To abandon the beliefs in that one has been educated. For ext., To abandon a faction to enter in other; or to change opinion or doctrine. 


 

We could bring more definitions, but we believe that these are enough to have an idea, to begin and to come closer to the essence of what is wanted to express when we speak of Apostasy.

If we make an analysis of the definitions that gives the Spanish dictionary, we observe that:
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Why?

Firstly because it is defined by The Spanish Academy.

Then because well it is known that the whole culture of Spain, always have being faithful to the Catholic Papacy, from the half age still until Franco's death, adherence of the one which still nowadays cannot come off.

Because in Spain and in all their former colonies, to be Christian was and it is still to be Catholic." Maybe don't still have in clear that the whole Hispanic culture, although doesn't want it, it is deeply Catholic, even when some is declared non religious.

Then we have in this particular case that when one says: to deny, I deviate or to abandon, it should be read": to deny the Catholicism", to deviate from the Catholicism to another religion " y/o " to abandon the Catholic church."

This way, this way expressed, it sounds more than agreement to the real concept that was in mind when giving the definition and to publish the dictionary, of the heirs of the culture that I leave the Spanish inquisition after long centuries of political power and cultural domain.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Even when the Academy of the Spanish language hides the source of this definitions, what cannot hide is that:

They are definitions of extortion manner and repressive form of somebody that appeals to the force of the fear and the extortion with fear, before to the wise teacher's loving teaching. They correspond more to threats and promises easy of hells and eternal tortures, before the persevering work and the continuous effort to get the truth and the light that it illuminates us. (DyC 121)

Men that, when not having to be able to spiritual real, that is to say when lacking the real knowledge of the truth, (as it possessed it the Great Teacher that is the only thing that grants the authority to convince and to discourage the man), irresponsibly they are released to give false definitions with more political and more commercial ends that spiritual. (2Pe.2:10-15.)

To these corruptive of the Truth, few it has interested him the spiritual and mental health of the people, (2Pe.2:2-3.) but rather with the definition, teaching and practice of this apostasy concept, they have looking for to scare their spiritual prisoners, so that they desist of all intent of being liberated of the imposed captivity, first with spiritual and mental extortion, you threaten physical and then also to sword tip.

As they were very aware that the souls to the being tried this way, and to feel discomfort with similar imposition, they would not doubt to move away from this yoke before any opportunity that you/they are presented, alone it was them to dominate and to retain their souls with the fear, convincing them that when trying to abandon the original belief", the belief of their parents", to understand any other thing that it is not it the one that church said", or so only to have a different opinion", hopelessly this escape action would open them the doors of the hell, to swallow them alive in the moment that you/they dared to think, to speak or to execute some of these things.

Some of the keys to maintain this domain therefore time, it is the "brain wash" that this " apostasy " concept injected in the deep of the unconscious, causes systematically in our blood or rather in our genetic memory, installing in her our own, persistent and obliging justification of all this corruption.

Self fed and taken care by our own fears, this virus that kills all intent of freedom and any creation principle and evolution of the human soul, was hammered through centuries with tremendous success, for the religious partners of the reining powers and with the atrocious cultural consequences that are visible (yes it is that we can give ourselves the luxury of understanding them). (DyC123:7-8)

  Gets the attention, for the not very Christian prepotency of the church to impose this definition in a dictionary, as well as other so many ones (that won't try in this opportunity), and this way to hinder the correct development of the education, altering and pawing necessary and fundamental basic principles of intelligence, for the human growth. (2 NEFI 20:1)

 No stops to also recognize the little dignity and the publishing gentlemen's personality, when being allowed to run over so easily for the cassock's Mafia or by its own genetic stupidity.

Does  also give us smarting sensation, the little courage of the clergymen that don't complete the sentence, when they define: "to Deny the faith". Why they are not more men? and do they express its complete thoughts? saying what should write according to their beliefs: "to Deny the Catholic faith", "to Abandon the Catholic belief of the parents", "to Abandon the Catholic church, for other." this maybe is not what the priests repeat town

We reach the final conclusion, that during centuries these feudal gentlemen, they have dominated us with license to adulterate the law, permission to become trained such falsifications, and via free to torture us and to kill us if we dared to realize and to express it. Any man or group of power on the earth would reject so much power together.

But the most refined and diabolical weapon is this subtlety that to have us of being caught in a jail, being ourselves our own jailers. This is the most dangerous thing that implies this concept of Apostasy Catholic Version.

These are the monsters of the ocean in the Dark Age of the obscurantism. Imaginary monsters that didn't exist truly, but the sufficiently real ones for our such mind that didn't allow us to cross the sea.

If Israel had Fear to the freedom proposed by Moses, we overcome it thoroughly; we are with Terror to the freedom." and Fear to the Knowledge"

The clear understanding of this concept, constitutes the key of the padlock and the door of same exit for the human liberation of the dominant culture.

If we don't achieve it to liberate the door of our soul of this padlock that maintains it closed, we will remain prisoners, being ourselves the jailers. If on the contrary we are able to force the bolt and to open up, this it is the main door that will finally lead us to all the freedom looked for by the mankind.  (DyC 123:12)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Since we do cheer up to write definitions, because we don't make them clearer and more precise, as he/she would really make them a man?

Are we afraid to the clear definitions? To who do we fear him?

Should not we speak so clearly for not offending the susceptibility of the other churches?. Should not we attack with violence, to those that secretly denominate pejoratively: the Protestant heretics", or the murderous Jews of God and of the prophets?"

Or maybe because in definitive truth we should remain silent, not for the respect and love, but for the no-aggression pact between partners and copartners of the same business?

Allow us now to explain to them, gentlemen Cloudy Explanations" that to the great problem that you caused, he/she has been united the confusion of the gentlemen that you didn't want to offend, that is to say that to your dear Protestant shepherds, they have been happened to take in their hands the same garbage that you have created. Let us say that for the reformist boys of the north, they have not found better explanation for the word Apostasy that the definition of the dictionary imposed by the Catholic church, and they use it in the same way in that the inquisition makes it, that is to say with intimation and repressive way.

When they make this, kindly they forget their poor and just origin, and they assume the paper mediocre and corrupt that they objected in you, in times of their rebellious birth. They renounce of their roots and they assume that what you defined in corruption, very defined it is.

The fools, doesn't understand that on this way their primitive critical to you, when being judged by this law they should be considered Apostate; therefore we can reach the conclusion that they this way, when accepting the Catholic definition, accept and they say of themselves that they have apostatized from their origin.

Of course that before similar accusation they would run to verify the law that the condemnate them, and they would try to give another explanation of the same one, being surely contradicted like it is very common in them
 
 

Will it be this way, the concept of the word " apostasy " that the divine wisdom tries to give us through the writings? So snub, so sectarian, so of political party, so contradictory with the freedom of looking for the Truth?

Definitively it doesn't fit with an Universal, intelligent and just God.

With all this, maybe and let us don't still understand what means Apostasy, but I believe we will agree for yes to understand for it discards, what doesn't mean to apostatize.

To change one or several points of view, he/she doesn't have to do with this. Changing point of view is almost unavoidable part of the search process and learning in any study that is faced with seriousness.

It is more any Church including The Catholic, when they preach us, when they challenge us to the regret, they ask us expressly that we change our point of view. and that it is the regret but a real and deep " change "?.

Could he/she be sorry somebody that was not willing to change their point of view?

We could say here also that the habit change doesn't make to the monk, neither good neither bad"

Definitively to change religion or of church it is not the idea of what was wanted to express formerly. Let us should probably look for it the definition in another side.
 
 























 We intends to show that that of the dictionary doesn't have anything in common and it is diametrically opposed to the definition and use that expressed the Bible and its teachings on this same topic. We should suppose with the whole right that the Bible like authorized word of God, has much more validity in the definitions that the word of any human, be what is, and without caring of what masquerades to explain to us its mortal thoughts.

When we study the biblical text, confronting it with the definitions of the religions, we also meet with the unpleasant surprise, that indeed an abysmal distance exists among the doctrinal concept of the writing and the political concept that the priests fenced to dominate mind, spirit and soul.

.. Let us see these verses that are the only ones in the whole text, where the word appears
 
 

JER 2

19. Lord of the Armies says: `` Your wickedness will punish you, and your apostasy will condemn you. It recognizes, because, and you go how bad and I make bitter it is having abandoned The Lord your God and not having feared me.

JER 5

6. For that reason it will hurt them the lion of the forest, the destroy the wolf of the desert, and the leopard will watch his cities. Anyone that leaves them will be broken; because their rebellions have multiplied, and their apostasy has been increased.

 JER 8

5. Does reason apostatize this people, oh Jerusalem, with perennial apostasy? He/she clings to the deceit; they refuse to return.

 2 THES 2

3 nobody deceives you in no way; because this won't happen without he/she comes the apostasy first and the man of iniquity, the perdition son is manifested.
 
 

The word " apostasy " is used in several biblical passages by the prophets of The Lord God to point out to the people, not to each one, but to the group of men and families, the Israeli decadence, the corruption, the fall from its original position, or the loss of its first state. In any way he/she goes to some man in particular, but rather when it uses the word he/she makes it to indicate problems of the people. We don't find any paragraph along the sacred text that he/she speaks to us of apostasy like a personal problem.

In these examples we see that he/she is related " apostasy " with: " wickedness ", I abandon The Lord God", lack of fear to The Lord God", " rebelliousness ", I deceive, I reject", " iniquity ", perdition children."

And on the other hand we observe that the results and effects of the " apostasy " are related with " punishment ", it condemns, " bitterness ", " wound ", " destruction ". In any event they prophesy them as a result that their own wickedness or the wild animals will be taken charge of the punishment of their sins, in contrast with the personalized persuasion of the Inquisition.

 When the prophets denounced Apostasy, they expressed that this era caused by the rejection from the people to God and their Truth, not for the rejection or it criticizes their leaders, or because some isolated Israeli spent to adore the Ra of the Egyptians, or to the Baal of their neighbors. This was solved individually, with each person in question.

For the whole system Jewish - Christian, to reject to God is to reject the Truth or to reject the Truth it is to reject to God.

Because I am the way, the Truth and the Life" (John.14:6).

The writings anything speaks that God condemns the rejection to some church or some little shepherd that have very broken into fragments ideas of what is the True. For the opposite same Jesus takes charge of seeking advice that we don't listen to them, we don't follow it, we don't go after them, and that we are careful not to be deceived by them

Mat. 24.

4. Responding Jesus, he/she told them: you Look that nobody deceives you.

5. Because many will come on my behalf, saying: I am the Christ, and to many they will deceive.

11. And many false prophets will get up, and they will deceive many.

23. Then, if some said you: you Look here the Christ is, or Look there it is, you don't believe it.

24. Because false Christ and false prophets will get up, and they will make big signs and prodigies, in such a way that you/they will deceive, if it was possible, even to the chosen ones.

25. I have already told before it to you.

26. So, if said you: you Look, it is in the desert, you don't leave; or Look it is in the rooms, you don't believe it

Marc. 13.

23. Then, if some said you: you Look here the Christ is, or Look there it is, you don't believe it.

Luc. 17.

23. And they will tell you: it Froze here, it froze there. You don't go, neither you follow them.
 
 

The prophets didn't point to each man's individual actions, but rather its warning, went mainly to the head, to the main ones, to the old men, to the priests, inclusive to the same prophets. It was not The Lord God that spoke to the head of the body, to the feet or the hands. Because he/she was spoken to the responsible ones, not to those directed. It was reprehended and it was not questioned the father to the son. These leaders would be those responsible for the condemnation and punishment, of an entire people. The thing depended on them, and not of if the widow deposited or not the tithe.

As we see they not spoke quantitative but qualitatively of the fall of an entire system of disobedient to their God. Not of the disobedience to their shepherds, but of the disobedience of their shepherds.

The Lord God this tired of their shepherds.

 Zac 10

3. Against the shepherds has lit my anger, and I will punish the bosses. Because The Lord God of the Armies will visit to its flock, to the house of Judá, and it will put them as its horse of honor in the war.

Eze 34

10. Lord The Lord God has said this way: there am here I am against the shepherds, and I will demand my sheep of its hands! I will make that they stop to graze the sheep, and they will stop to graze to themselves. I will liberate my sheep of their mouths, and they won't serve them more than food.
 
 

We have seen then that what the religious condemn in general is the fact that an individual possesses a religion and then move away from her or it simply changes it for another. We have also seen that The Writings, explain to us that Apostasy is to abandon a people The truth or to rebel against God. Sew very different to each other.
 
 
 

  • Is good and becomes necessary to clarify by way of illustrative example as it happened the apostasy of Israel. This example will be we of great utility to be able to understand the apostasy like concept and I eat historical fact, because there is a lot of ignorance in this respect 
  • If we read the history of Israel in the Bible we will see that from Joshua's times until the deportation to Babylon for hands of Nabucodonosor, it was never a religion like most believes, but rather they constituted a people, contained around the law of Moses, what gave him unit and purpose like a nation and I don't eat a simple religion. Moses never spoke of forming a religion, This invention cared him the Jews that returned of Babylon, when seeing as the pagan and paid priests ($) of the empire they were sustained by its people, (to See salaried shepherds) that that judging by the results and for the writings in the rolls of the Dead Sea that denounce this Priestly Fraud, they liked so much this handling type to the point that in little time they could transform the theocratic system of Israel, in the coarse rabbinical religion that killed the Messiah. 
  • It is worth as simple explanation without extending in this exciting topic. Our accusation for the time being is limited to the Mormon Apostasy, then we will be in charge of its predecessors and teachers in the corruption. 
  • It becomes important to understand the apostasy of the Jews to understand the Mormon apostasy and vice versa. Because here we also have an economic designed people and socially according to the Christian pattern and spiritually theocratic that also responded to the pattern of Israel in the time previous to the Jewish apostasy that took place after the Babylonian deportation, in the year 500 AC. 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

It can still be that it seems that we are being about the same thing. If we examine thoroughly we will see a great distance between an example and another.

Among simply to abandon the nimbleness of a belief, of a supposition, for the stability of the knowledge of a truth, and to abandon the responsibility that grants the knowledge of the truth, for the simplicity of a belief.

What will the bad thing be? To change a belief for a truth? or to change a truth for a belief.?. It can be that he/she makes some more transcendent spiritual sense, the fact that somebody possesses a truth and then he/she leaves it.
 
 

To help us to understand the difference better between the religious version of Apostasy and that of the Writings, let us take a supposed history by way of parable.

Let us think of a doctor that through time, effort and a lot of work, he/she discovers some important truth in the cure of an illness, until that incurable moment.

In this example, this doctor, not alone it checked in the laboratory, but rather parallelly in their clinic, it could benefit several men and women with their new medicine. He/she did with their own eyes, and with complete understanding given in the quantity and quality of their experiences that its discovery, produced highly positive results. He/she could understand and to understand convincingly, without doubts that he/she had in their hands the truth that would liberate to many of a pain and hopeless death.

But..... for some reason, perhaps because he/she understood, or because they helped him to understand that this good one new he/she would go against other you interest that this would put in risk the stability of some industry, or because the work of other, would depend that the things continued like they were that its product would affect the business of some economic groups, this doctor began to consider the possibility to have to leave this work.

That if he/she didn't understand this, and if he/she wanted to continue helping their patients with their new one it formulates, it should be exposed to persecutions or pressures.

Probably for things as these, he/she began to see that their life, profession and stability was in danger; and on the other hand that would not win enough to its rewards and efforts with its work, and that unless it put agreement between its attitudes and the interests of certain powerful laboratories, they would get up on him and its family a dangerous persecution. Perhaps it considered that with less efforts it could continue living comfortably him and his, without being exposed, to so many risks.
 
 

Maybe they originated more reasons than the exposed ones, but the concrete thing is that, the man of our history abandoned his investigation works, and he wanted to leave aside what his knowledge proposed him, he/she wanted to be as the other ones and him his no longer benefited more to anybody.

The fear was imposed to the benefit of a deep joy singular that for on this, it would take certain solution to problems of other men's life. This failure, and the fear prevailed on its investigation and its desires of reaching new knowledge. Their work was not already so exciting, as it had been before it, the search of the truth already began to be displaced of its position by the simple routine task, and the deep joy, replaced by the bonus of not being dead. The solid truths gave place to compassionate lies. The clear concepts were changed by truths without enough confirmation.

Certain it is that this history doesn't have name, but certain it is also that he/she could have the one of many of us.

If we see carefully, this apostasy or corruption of truths that save take place with people that has some vital truth and then for some reason he/she abandons her. It cannot make the act of apostatizing or of corrupting somebody that doesn't have acquired knowledge of some truth, because to such a man it could not be made responsible of deviation, abandonment or to deny something when still at least he/she knows it. A little more than deviation it will worsen their situation, notably?

Whom will be able to accuse of irresponsibility, to that that not having something to give, does continue without having, or to that that having to give, did anything give because for fear it deviated and did it bury their talent and didn't it let that this gave their fruit?
 
 

 Alma 24.

30. And we can discern this way clearly that after a people has been illuminated by the Spirit of God, and it has possessed a great knowledge of the things belonging to the rightness, and then he/she falls in the sin and the transgression, it ends up being more obstinate, and its condition is this way worse than if has never known these things.

 2 Pe. 2

20. Certainly, if there being been them escaped of the contamination of the world, for the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, getting entangled another time in them is conquered, the latter end becomes worse than the first one.

2Ne. 9

27 Woe are of that to who the law is given him; yes that has all the commandments of God as us, and that it smashes them, and it wastes the days of its probation, because its state is terrible
 
 
 
 
 

DENUNCIATION
Apostasy and Corruption

Return to index of topics 

Send their comments and consultations by mail electronic 

To read or to print disconnected to Internet 

PAGINA PRINCIPAL | INDEX | FREEMAN | MORMON APOSTASY | TEMPORARY DOC. | POOR AND NEEDFUL | EQUALITY | PRIVATE PROPERTY | CONSECRATION | TITHES | HIRELING SHEPHERDS | BISHOPS | CONCLUSIONS | PRIESTHOOD DOC. | CALLINGS | ORDINANCES | PREACH | TEMPLES | COMMANDS DOC. | SCRIPTURES | WORD OF WISDOM | SACRAMENT | ZION´S CONSTRUCTION  | ABOUT THE DEATH OF JOSEPH SMITH | ALL IS WELL IN ZION | FINAL SYNTHESIS | e-mail | Reading without connection | Spanish text

1