The american right is currently dominated by a group called the neoconservatives ­ primarily jews whose main political concerns are to use american military/economic power to promote jewish supremacism even if this involves sequential proxy zionist wars. But all parts of the american political spectrum, not only the far right but the far left, are dominated by jews so that even whilst there are full and open debates over which economic/social/political system is best, most politically active jews support the racist jos and endeavour to prevent any criticisms of the jos.

The jol’s dominance over the democratic party has spawned a breed of neo-liberals such as hilary clinton. This phenomenon is now so common all that is needed is one tiny example, "The liberal intelligentsia have failed in their responsibility on specifically this question. Because they maintain a nostalgic view of the Establishment as a Christian stronghold in which pro-Israel Jews have limited power, or because they like to make George Bush and the Christian end-timers and the oilmen the only bad guys in a debacle, or because they are afraid of pogroms resulting from talking about Jewish power, they have peeled away from addressing the neocons' Israel-centered view of foreign relations." (Philip Weiss Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby' http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060515/weiss May 15, 2006).

The left in america is equally as dominated by american jews as neoconservatism and neoliberalism. Although those on the left are supposed to be fervently anti-racist most of them are supporters of the racist jos. They are, to be more specific, anti-racist racists. The amazing intellectual feat of proclaiming anti-racism whilst also supporting the racist jos, has been accomplished primarily by noam chomsky, the chief rabbi of the left, who has argued that it is the american empire which has forced the jos into becoming a racist state. "He (chomsky) would have us believe that Israel’s occupation and harsh actions against the Palestinians, its invasions and undeclared 40 years war on Lebanon, and its arming of murderous regimes in Central America and Africa during the Cold War, has been done as a client state in the service of US interests. In Chomsky’s world view, that absolves Israel of responsibility and has become standard Chomsky doctrine." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict ­ April 2005). Chomsky is to the left wing of american politics what richard perle is to the right. This is the basis of what could be called neoleftism. The american left is dominated by neolefties. Just as is the case with neoconservatism, there are many non-jews who regard themselves as neolefties but quite what they are doing in a movement which is ideologically traitorous to their own country is difficult to discern.

In the 2004 presidential elections, the american green party sold out ralph nader for the sake of the jewish dominated, racist, war mongering, democratic party candidate, john kerry. The greens running the green party are neogreenies ­ see the article ‘Zionist Machinations in the American Green Party?’.

America’s so-called peace movement refuses to criticize, or protest about, the racist, war-mongering, apartheid state in palestine. There are many examples of such an attitude amongst what ought to be called the neopeaceniks.

Since the formation of the jos, the jewish dominated american media, jewish academia/think tanks, the jol, the jewish owned congress, and the jews in the bush administration, have done their best to protect the racist jos. But support for the jos is rife from top to bottom and from left and right of the american political spectrum.

America’s jewish elite do not merely own a substantial part of the american media, academia/think tanks, american politicians, or run a jewish state deliberately camouflaged by the decaying husk of a wasp american state. They have influenced the political views of virtually all those in politics from top to bottom and from far left to far right. They have also played a significant role in shaping the views held by most sections of american society. There is virtually no segment of american society that is not influenced by jewish power or jewish interests. "The power of the minority of politically active Jewish financiers in the pro-Israel lobby is spreading far beyond the area of US foreign policy into the cultural, academic and economic life of the US." (James Petras ‘The Ascendancy of Finance Capital: Record Profits and Rising Authoritarianism - March 28, 2006). The racism endemic in the jos has now become rife throughout american politics and society. Instead of american power being able to force the jos into abolishing jewish racism, the jos through its jewish supporters in america, has succeeded in turning american society and politics into pro-jewish racists.

Over the last four decades tens of millions of american christians have become christian evangelists. Although they are commonly known as ‘christian zionists’ they are more accurately described as dechristianized zionists. They believe in the judaic god of revenge rather than the christian god of forgiveness: they believe in the old testament more than they do the new testament with the exception of the book of revelations. "In his outstanding book The New American Militarism, Andrew Bacevich describes how evangelicals - who once were both politically quiescent and skeptical of the culture that surrounded military life - came, in the wake of Vietnam, to embrace the military as a sort of bulwark against national moral decay. With the corresponding decline in political numbers and influence of the mainline Protestant churches, this increased energy on the evangelical Right changed dramatically the way most American Christians regard war. In the hands of evangelicals, Just War principles became, in Bacevich's words, "not a series of stringent tests but a signal: not a red light, not even a flashing yellow, but a bright green that relieved the Bush administration of any obligation to weigh seriously the moral implications of when and where it employed coercion." And thus, in the developed world's most devout country, Christian witness against war "became less effective than in countries thoroughly and probably irreversibly secularized." Evangelicals have in great part transformed the Christian view of Just War into a crusade theory in which the United States is believed to embody God's will and its enemies are "God's enemies."" (Scott McConnell ‘How They Get Away With It’ http://www.amconmag.com/2005_07_04/article.html July 4, 2005).

American oil companies allowed their country to be pushed into an invasion of iraq they didn’t support. "The neo-cons who are almost exclusively Jewish and the Israel lobby got the US into the war in Iraq. The father of the President, the first George Bush was against it, the oil companies were against it." (Jeffrey Blankfort quoted in Réseau Voltaire ‘The Chomsky/Blankfort Polemic’ http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials
/signs_TheChomskyBlankfortPolemic.php February 20, 2006). Perhaps even more remarkable is that america’s gigantic multi-national oil companies failed to protect their vast investments in new orleans because the bush administration was more concerned about providing tribute payments to the jos ­ despite george bush’s and dick cheney’s connections to the oil industry. See the chapter ‘Katrina Exposes the dominance of Zionism over America’s Oil Industry’.in ‘The Amazing Spectacle of America’s Self-Destruction: Zionists and Katrina (Part Three)’.

Many american trade unions invest their pension funds in the jos and thus have an economic incentive for supporting the racist state even at the expense of palestinian workers. "While not officially part of the lobby, since the establishment of Israel in 1948, the AFL-CIO has been one of its most solid cornerstones. It has provided millions of dollars for pro-Israel Democrats; it has blocked all international efforts to punish Israel for its exploitation and abuse of Palestinian workers, and it has encouraged its member unions to invest millions of dollars of their pension funds in State of Israel Bonds, thereby linking their members' retirement to the health of the Israeli economy." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘The Israel Lobby and the Left: Uneasy Questions’ http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html c.2004). When the jos launched an illegal invasion of lebanon on june 6th 1982, "it was supported by the AFL-CIO which took out a full page ad in the NY Times, declaring "We Are Not Neutral. We Support Israel!" paid for by an Israeli lobbyist with a Park Avenue address." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict ­ April 2005).

American universities also invest funds in the jos and thus have an economic incentive in propping up the jewish hate state. "investing in Israeli companies and in State of Israel Bonds of which US labor union pension funds, and many states and universities have purchased hundreds of millions of dollars worth. These purchases clearly obligate those institutions to lobby Congress to insure that the Israeli economy stays afloat." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict ­ April 2005).

Prior to the 1960s there were taboos in america, as in many other western countries, against discussing a range of social/private issues such as homosexuality, incest, male rape, etc, etc. Since those days these taboos have virtually disappeared and today nobody would think twice about discussing such issues. The only taboos in america these days concern jewish power. The same is also true in other western countries suggesting that the same political forces are at work throughout the western world. America’s jewish elite, jewish dominated universities, the jewish domination of the american media, jewish think tanks, and the jewish owned political system, have succeeded in establishing taboos over anything to do with jews. These taboos are promoted and used deliberately to protect and enhance jewish power in america and the western world. There is a taboo about jewish funding of american political parties (just as in britain). There is a taboo over the influence of the jol in america. There is even a taboo about mentioning the existence of the jol. There is a taboo about jewish ownership of the american media. There is a taboo about the tribute payments that america makes to its jewish masters in the jos. There is a taboo about jewish power in any country around the world. There is a taboo about russia’s jewish oligarchs’ take over of the russian economic and political systems in the 1990’s. There are even taboos against the use of the words ‘jew’ or ‘jewish’.

Such is the domination of america’s ruling jewish elite that it has made the word ‘jew’ a taboo. It is quite common for the jewish dominated media to refer to an individual as being ‘black’ or ‘hispanic’ or ‘gay’ or lesbian’ or to indicate their age or to describe them as being tall or short or good/bad looking, but the one exception is that, as always, it is not possible to describe anyone as a jew. It is not possible to describe jewish hollywood actors as american jews. To indicate that a jewish hollywood actor is an american jew is deemed to be anti-semitic and racist.

"The myth of "war for oil" is circulated by almost all the major progressive Jewish intellectuals and parroted by their Gentile followers, who are in word and deed prohibited from mentioning the AIPAC word in any public meetings or manifestos." (James Petras ‘The Ascendancy of Finance Capital: Record Profits and Rising Authoritarianism - March 28, 2006).

The same point is true as regards the use of the phrase ‘the jewish lobby’ or ‘the israeli lobby’. Despite the fact that the media in the jos uses these phrases, the jol denounces anyone in america, or the western world, who uses them as a racist and anti-semite. "In fact, anyone who says that there is an Israel Lobby runs the risk of being charged with anti-Semitism, even though the Israeli media themselves refer to America’s "Jewish Lobby." In effect, the Lobby boasts of its own power and then attacks anyone who calls attention to it." (John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ rwp_06_011_walt.pdf March 2006 p.24); "By the way, American guests in Israel, who know that at home it is forbidden to mention the influence of the Jewish-Israeli lobby, are dumbfounded to see that here the lobby does not hide its power in Washington but openly boasts of it." (Uri Avnery ‘Who's the dog? Who's the tail?’ http://world.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/29562 April 22 2006); "Americans are gradually being indoctrinated to believe .. there is no "Israeli lobby" in America." (Mike Scheuer ‘Does Israel Conduct Covert Action in America?’ http://www.antiwar.com/scheuer/?articleid=8827 April 8, 2006); "After Dershowitz came other vulgar outbursts, such as from Eliot Cohen in the Washington Post. These attacks basically reiterated Dershowitz's essential theme: There is no such thing as the Israel lobby, and those asserting its existence are by definition anti-Semitic." (Alexander Cockburn ‘The uproar over the Isreal lobby’ http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/2/2006/1368 May 5, 2006). David gergen wrote a response to mearsheimer and walt’s paper entitled, ‘There is no Israel 'Lobby'’ (David Gergen http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/v-pfriendly
/story/402910p-341257c.html March 26th, 2006).

The jol celebrates its achievements in manipulating the american political system but it denounces anyone else who points this out.

Such is the power of the global jewish empire that it has prevented the american government from formally recognizing the existence of the jos’s nuclear weapons, "The U.S. government has never acknowledged that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, even though the world knows otherwise, thanks to the whistleblower, Mordechai Vanunu. (London Sunday Times, Oct. 5, 1986)." (Mark Gaffney ‘Will Iran Be Next?’ http://informationclearinghouse.info/article3288.htm May 8th 2003). Jews in america have exploited this situation to establish a taboo over discussing the issue of jewish nuclear weapons. However, to repeat a point made above: such a taboo would not be possible if it wasn’t for jewish neolefties and jewish peaceniks who refuse to protest about the issue.

Although reputed to be the most democratic, and the most open, political system in the world, jewish taboos have festered over the decades until they are now powerful enough to prevent american politicians/commentators from criticizing the jos. "University of Michigan Professor Juan Cole further writes: Some readers have suggested that I have exaggerated AIPAC's hold on the US Congress. But I have direct knowledge of senators and congressmen being afraid to speak out on Israeli issues because of AIPAC's reputation for targeting representatives for un-election if they dare do so. And, it is easy to check. Look in the Congressional record. Is there ever/any/ speech given on the floor critical of Israeli policy, given by a senator or representative who goes on to win the next election? And look at the debates in every other parliament in the world; there are such criticisms elsewhere. The US Congress is being held hostage by a single-issue lobbying organization that often puts Israeli interests above US interests..."" (Quoted in Jeffrey Blankfort ‘Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict ­ April 2005); "Congress, they (M/W) point out, virtually never criticizes Israel: It is an untouchable subject. And this taboo has had enormous consequences, which are themselves off limits for discussion. Above all, they seek to end the taboo, enforced by knee-jerk accusations of anti-Semitism, that has prevented a full and open discussion of these issues." (Juan Cole ‘Breaking the silence’ http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fuj/salon5.htm Apr. 18, 2006); "The Congress, the Executive branch, state and local governments, and national and local media have all come under the influence of the Jewish "lobby’s" pro-Israel agenda to the point that none or few dare to criticize Israel or its US representatives." (James Petras ‘The meaning of war: A heterodox perspective’ http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=12606 January 2005); "One must also ask why is it always possible to criticize a US president on the floor of Congress but never an Israeli prime minister?" (Jeffrey Blankfort’s comments on Mitchell Plitnick’s ‘Myth and Reality: Jewish Influence on US Middle East Policy’ May 24th 2005); "A key pillar of the Lobby’s effectiveness is its influence in the U.S. Congress, where Israel is virtually immune from criticism. This is in itself a remarkable situation, because Congress almost never shies away from contentious issues. Whether the issue is abortion, affirmative action, health care, or welfare, there is certain to be a lively debate on Capitol Hill. Where Israel is concerned, however, potential critics fall silent and there is hardly any debate at all." (John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ rwp_06_011_walt.pdf March 2006 p.17); "Although criticism of specific Israeli policies is permissible in the United States, it is more or less forbidden to express fundamental criticism of the Zionist state, of America's basic policy of support for Israel, or of the Jewish-Zionist grip on the US media or America's political and academic life. (Remarkably, this is in contrast to the situation in Israel itself, where Jews and even Arab citizens of the Zionist state have much greater freedom than Americans publicly to criticize Zionism and Israeli policies.) Prominent persons who dare to violate this prohibition are immediately castigated as "anti-Semitic" (that is, anti-Jewish), and pay a heavy price in damage to their reputations or careers. Politicians who publicly speak out against America's support for Zionism risk almost certain political ruin." (Abdullah Mohammad Sindi ‘How the Jewish-Zionist Grip on American Film and Television Promotes Bias Against Arabs and Muslims’ Institute for Historical Review http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n5p-2_Sindi.html c1999).

There is a taboo over americans discussing jewish racism in the jos. "With their allegations of anti-Semitism, American-Jewish elites seek, above all, to convince everybody that critics of Israel are really anti-Semites in disguise. Reports on what it is like for Palestinians to live under occupation, reports on their oppression and their suffering must remain taboo - only Israel is entitled to victim status. Thus reality is being inverted, in order to make sure that Israel enjoys immunity." (Felicia Langer ‘Preface to the German edition of Beyond Chutzpah’ March 27 2006).

.. "but anything more than the mildest criticism of Israel is taboo in the mainstream media." (Michael Lind ‘The Israel Lobby’ April 1, 2002).

There is also a jewish taboo against discussing jewish political power not only in america but anywhere else around the world. Ralph nader was one of the few to break this taboo, "The subservience of our congressional and White House puppets to Israeli military policy has been consistent. They’re almost all puppets. There are two sets: Congressional puppets and White House puppets. When the chief puppeteer (Sharon) comes to Washington, the puppets prance." (Pat Buchanan ‘Ralph Nader: Conservatively Speaking’ The American Conservative http://www.amconmag.com/2004_06_21/cover.html June 21, 2004). Nader never repeated this statement or elaborated upon it or sought to use it as the basis for policies to counter such distortions of political power. Perhaps the reason for this is that nobody came to his defence when the jol accused him of anti-semitism. It has been dumped quietly into the dustbin of history.

Those commentators/academics/intellectuals who oppose the jos are often buried in a hole of oblivion. The jewish elite ensures this happens even to their own people. "While speaking to students in Harvard, Emory and other Ivy League universities, I noticed that they do not know the name of Arnold Toynbee. The greatest British philosopher of history in 20th century made an error: he spoke of the tragedy of Palestinians. He also mentioned the African slavery as a tragedy on a par with the Jewish holocaust. As a result, he was erased and disappeared from American conscience. This totality of control over public discourse explains obedience of American (and European) intellectuals. For an intellectual, it is better to be called a paedophile, but not an anti-Semite." (Israel Shamir ‘A Yiddishe Medina’ http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Medina.htm). Hannah arendt is another such jew confined to oblivion for her criticisms of jewish racism.