The jol, jewish academia/think tanks, and the jewish dominated media promote jewish propaganda to put the jos in the best possible light. They cover up the jos’s racist apartheid nature with a mountain of lies. They have established a wide range of taboos about jewish issues to prevent people from even thinking about jewish power. They seek to prevent critical opinions of the jos from appearing in the american media. If a critical view is publicized, the jol does not seek to refute such a criticism nor encourage people to debate the criticism. On the contrary, the jol launches into a propaganda offensive to condemn and vilify the author as an anti-semite. The jol seeks to intimidate, anyone for their transgression by accusing them of being as nazi. Ultimately, the jol seeks to punish any transgressor.

It has already been noted that the jol punishes any candidate for congressional office who does not confess their undying loyalty to the jos. "At present, however, members of Congress from all regions are still reluctant to offend a single-issue lobby that can and will subsidise their opponents …. In these circumstances, how could US policy not be biased in favour of Israel? (Michael Lind ‘The Israel Lobby’ April 1, 2002).

The same also applies to candidates for positions in american administrations, "And the uniformed military is often attacked in the pages of pro-Israel journals whose writers (most of them armchair generals who never served in the military) denounce the alleged pusillanimity of American soldiers who are unwilling to "take out" states like Iraq and Iran that particularly threaten Israel. Even the intelligence community has been accused of anti-semitism, for its principled opposition to a pardon for the spy, Jonathan Pollard. The aborted career of Admiral Bobby Ray Inman provides a troubling example of this dynamic at work. After Clinton nominated Inman, a career Naval officer and the former head of the national security agency, for the position of secretary of defence, Inman was savaged in the press by William Safire, a former Nixon speechwriter and conservative Republican who thought George Bush Sr was insufficiently pro-Israel. In his New York Times column Safire damned Inman for having "contributed to the excessive sentencing of Jonathan Pollard," Israel's spy in the naval intelligence service (whom some Jewish-Americans treat as a martyred saint). Inman responded by charging that Safire had secretly lobbied the CIA Director, William Casey, to overrule a 1981 decision by Inman, then deputy CIA director, which limited Israel's access to US intelligence. For this reason, Safire attacked Inman in the New York Times by charging him with an "anti-Israel bias." Rather than face what he called the "new McCarthyism," Inman withdrew." (Michael Lind ‘The Israel Lobby’ Prospect April 1, 2002).

The jol also polices america’s universities. Firstly, monitoring lecturers’ views. "The Lobby also monitors what professors write and teach. In September 2002, for example, Martin Kramer and Daniel Pipes, two passionately pro-Israel neoconservatives, established a website (Campus Watch) that posted dossiers on suspect academics and encouraged students to report comments or behavior that might be considered hostile to Israel. This transparent attempt to blacklist and intimidate scholars prompted a harsh reaction and Pipes and Kramer later removed the dossiers, but the website still invites students to report alleged anti-Israel behavior at U.S. colleges." (John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ rwp_06_011_walt.pdf March 2006 p.22). "According to Mearsheimer and Walt, the Lobby is also trying to "police" ­ their word ­ the activities and beliefs of college professors and students. Faculty deemed not supportive of Israel are targeted, monitored, and subjected to "overt intimidation," as in the infamous case of Columbia University, where pro-Israel forces went to great lengths ­ even making a propaganda film ­ to stifle any expression of support for Palestinian rights. And it isn't just pressure tactics brought by private groups: they are now seeking to outlaw criticism of Israel by denying federal funds to campuses where Israel is not treated with kid gloves." (Justin Raimondo ‘The Lobby’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730 March 20, 2006).

In the past, jewish organizations prominent within america’s jol, collected details about individuals who opposed, or were critical of, the jos in the hope of being able to find some way of counteracting their views and, if possible, to stop them making such criticisms. "When the FBI raided the California offices of the Anti- Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith in 1993, they found that the ADL had computerized files on nearly 10,000 people across the country, and that more than 75 percent of the information had been illegally obtained from police, FBI files and state drivers license data banks." (http://www.rense.com/general31/thr.htm 11.11.02); "The other best-known "defense organization" is the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on all sorts of political organizations across the political spectrum, paid off some lawsuits, and in more recent years lost a $10.5 million lawsuit against it by a Denver film producer, William Quigley, who was smeared by ADL as - what else? - an "anti-Semite." (Chad Powers 'Welcome to Amerisraelistan' The Jewish Tribal Review January 2002 http://jewishtribalreview.org/amerisrael.htm). Even chomsky, the chief rabbi of the left, has described the adl as "...one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the U.S...Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who dares to criticize the Holy State ('Israel')."

Virtually all debate forums on the internet are policed by jews. Whether this is an accident or a deliberate policy is not known. The more popular and prestigious the forum, the more jews it will attract to try to impose jewish values, opinions, or taboos, on the participants and thus prevent open political debates. When they do not succeed in doing this they either resort to ridicule or to allegations of anti-semitism i.e. accusing anyone critical of the racist, terrorist, jos for being anti-jewish. If ridicule or denunciations do not work, there are thinly disguised threats of physical attacks. If this does not work, they report the alleged anti-semitism to the mediators of the fora who almost invariably removes the accused individual from the fora ­ usually without warning or explanation. The discussion fora run by national newspapers are heavily dominated by jews but even small scale, specialized fora invariably contain jews trying to uphold jewish propaganda. Even the most libertarian websites such as antiwar.com are subjected to jewish pressures to prevent individuals from breaking jewish taboos.

If jews believe their people have been persecuted and slaughtered for thousands of years by virtually all countries around the world; that 6 million were murdered in nazi concentration camps and that no country came to their rescue; that palestine was given by the jewish god to his chosen people on which it would be sacrilegious to allow non-jews to live; that the jos is a tiny, fragile, defenceless, country surrounded by a billion war-mongering, virulently anti-jewish arabs/moslems; and that everything must be done to combat any criticisms, let alone threats, to the sacred, spiritual homeland of the jewish people, then it is more than likely such jews will be willing to spy on those they believe might be a threat to the survival of the jewish people. The greater the paranoia about jewish survival, the greater the hysterical denunciations of those who oppose jewish racism, the greater the tendency for jews in america, as in other countries, to take over the state in order to control or oppress their actual, and potential, opponents. There is only one way that paranoid jews can guarantee their long term survival and that is through the establishment of jewish world domination.

It was pointed out above that the so-called ‘christian zionists’ are more appropriately defined as deamericanized, dechristianized zionists because they support the god of revenge and not the god of forgiveness and because they give political priority to the racial purification of the jos rather than the establishment of a christian state in america. They care more about judaism in the jos than they do about spreading christianity in their own country. This section provides further examples which suggest america’s leading politicians and religious figures are suffering from a total collapse not merely in their support for their national interests but in their national identity. "That is the state of American politics today. The Israeli lobby has put together so much money power that we are daily witnessing US senators and representatives bowing down low to Israel and its US lobby." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘The Israel Lobby and the Left: Uneasy Questions’ http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html c.2004). Jewish power in america is evident not merely in the jewish domination of major industries, the media, think tanks, congress and the american adminsitration. Nor merely in the ability of the jol to get politicians to make speeches written by jews solely for the sake of the jol. It can also be seen psychologically when americans seem to think of themselves as jews willing to sacrifice america’s national interests for a country they have never seen, inhabited by a people with a different language, a different culture and a different religion. Raimondo has pointed out the existence of a new phenomenon in american politics ­ non-jewish americans who have become to believe they’re citizens of the jos ­ pseudo jews ­ either because the rewards for supporting the jewish cause are so great or because they have become so corrupted by jewish power.

"In September 1991, with the war over, the Bush administration presented AIPAC with its greatest crisis since the battle with Ford. In the midst of the administration’s efforts to assemble the cast for what became the Madrid "peace conference," much to the consternation of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, Israel sprang a surprise on the President­a demand for $10 billion dollars in US guaranteed loans over a five year period. Congress, of course, was ready to jump through Israel’s hoops again over the opposition of President Bush. Angered at Israel’s demand and fearing, perhaps, that approval of the loan guarantees would allow Israel to withdraw from the conference while antagonizing the Arab invitees, Bush asked Shamir to postpone the loan application for 120 days, and made its approval conditional on Israel freezing Jewish settlements. When Bush indicated that he was going to ask for the delay, Arens recalled, "[Sen. Daniel] Inouye [D-HA] was not equivocal at all. He said, ‘I am putting on my yarmulkle; we’re going to war." (It was no coincidence that his first paying job after getting out of the Army after WW 2 had been as a salesman for State of Israel Bonds)." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict ­ April 2005).

"A couple years passed, and I received a colored brochure of a Falwell- sponsored trip. Like the first brochure, it was printed in Israel. In this brochure, Falwell did not once mention that we would be traveling to the Land of Christ. Nor, for that matter, did he once mention the name of Christ. Once we arrived, we had no Christian guide - to any site where Christ was born, died or had his ministry. There was not a single planned visit to a Christian church - or a plan to meet any of the Christians living there, whose forebears have lived in Palestine since the days of Christ. We had only Israeli guides, and the focus clearly was on military aspects. The Israeli guides gave us endless explanations of why the Israelis should keep all the land of historic Palestine, leaving nothing for the Palestinians. Once we were on a bus tour, and I thought surely we would stop in Nazareth. "No" said an Israeli guide. The bus would not stop in Nazareth. No one contested the guide's decision. On the outskirts of Nazareth, However, our Israeli guide changed his mind. "We will stop in Nazareth for 20 minutes" he announced, "to use the toilet facilities." And thus we stopped. We left Nazareth without having seen it. We proceeded to Jerusalem, where Falwell chose to honor Ariel Sharon, the burly general who masterminded the invasion of Lebanon which injured and killed 200,000 Palestinians and Lebanese, most of them civilians. In introducing Sharon, Falwell said that, in the annals of history, only a few great men came along. He named George Washington, Abraham Lincoln - and Ariel Sharon!" (Grace Halsell ‘Armageddon - Zionism's Diabolical Goal’ Rense.com 29.10.2003 http://www.rense.com/general43/amra.htm). This is about as clear an example as it is possible to get of a deamericanized, dechristianized, zionist.

"When it comes to Congress, "Israel is virtually immune from criticism." Some are Christian Zionists, like Dick Armey, who once proclaimed that his "number one priority" in terms of foreign policy is to support Israel come hell or high water." (Justin Raimondo ‘The Lobby’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730 March 20, 2006).

Tom delay, the republican house majority leader from texas, visited the jos where he stated, "I'm an Israeli at heart." He told the Israelis to hang tough and "no middle positions; be as tough as you need to be."" (Washington Week August 1st 2003 http://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/transcripts/transcript030801.html); "And they have good reasons for backing the embattled Republican. DeLay is one of Israel's most stalwart supporters in Congress. "DeLay is arguably the best friend Israel has in Congress," Morton Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America, which adamantly opposes the creation of a Palestinian state told the Jewish weekly Forward. "He's not simply a guy who you go for help. He gets other guys to help. A guy like DeLay will call you [to ask] what can he do." (‘Jews Stand Behind DeLay’ http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/4/15/124642.shtml April 15, 2005).

"Don't you think it's a bit strange that an American president said "I'd die for Israel," after dodging the draft when America was at war? The Israelis are in firm control of most American politicians, and AIPAC insures that any politician who doesn't support Israel, is not re-elected." (Jolly Roger ‘It's The Zionists Crime Syndicate - April 10 2006).

"Writing in the Brown Students for Israel publication Perspectives: An Israel Review, Kerry says: "My first trip to Israel made real for me all I’d believed about Israel. I was allowed to fly an air-force jet from the Ovda Airbase. It was then that Israeli insecurity about narrow borders became very real to me. In a matter of minutes, I came close to violating the airspace of Egypt, Jordan and Syria. From that moment on, I felt as Israelis do: The promise of peace must be secure before the Promised Land is a secure margin of land." "I went as a friend by conviction; I returned a friend at the deepest personal level," he writes, ending his article with, "In this difficult time we must again reaffirm we are enlisted for the duration — and reaffirm our belief that the cause of Israel must be the cause of America — and the cause of people of conscience everywhere." (Linda S. Heard ‘Whether It’s Bush or Kerry, Israel’s Laughing’ Arab News http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=48986&d=
27&m=7&y=2004&pix=opinion.jpg&category=Opinion July 27 2004).

Kay arthur is a popular "Christian Zionist" author and minister, who blurted out, "I love America. But if it came to a choice between Israel and America, I would stand with Israel." (Quoted in Justin Raimondo ‘Putting Israel First’ http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=0 March 6th 2005). Another perfect example of a deamericanized, dechristianized, zionist.

Nancy pelosi feels at home in the jos, "This spring, I was in Israel as part of a congressional trip that also took us to Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq," said Pelosi. "One of the most powerful experiences was taking a helicopter toward Gaza, over the path of the security fence. We set down in a field that belonged to a local kibbutz. It was a cool but sunny day, and the field was starting to bloom with mustard. Mustard is a crop that grows in California, and it felt at that moment as if I were home. And then we were told that the reason we had to land in that field, as opposed to our actual destination, was because there had been an infiltration that morning, and they weren't sure how secure the area was. And that point alone brought us back to the daily reality of Israel: even moments of peace and beauty are haunted by the specter of violence."" (Joshua Frank ‘Israel Comes First: Pelosi at AIPAC’ http://www.counterpunch.org/frank05312005.html May 31, 2005). Every time a group of americans visits the jos, a phantom palestinian suicide bomber suddenly appears to make the point, in a dramatic and theatrical manner, that jews are eternal victims. Pelosi seems perfectly willing to push the world into a third world war to protect her beloved jos, "The greatest threat to Israel's right to exist, with the prospect of devastating violence, now comes from Iran. For too long, leaders of both political parties in the United States have not done nearly enough to confront the Russians and the Chinese, who have supplied Iran as it has plowed ahead with its nuclear and missile technology." (Nancy Pelosi quoted in Joshua Frank ‘Israel Comes First: Pelosi at AIPAC’ http://www.counterpunch.org/frank05312005.html May 31, 2005).

"During AIPAC's annual conference this month, which attracted top US officials and congressional leaders, the new Republican majority leader in the US House of Representatives, John Boehner, vowed never to allow anti-Israel legislation to come to the floor. "As the new House majority leader, I can assure you that under my leadership, legislation that is in any way perceived as anti-Israel will not be considered in the House of Representatives," said Boehner." (Emad Mekay ‘Study blasts US pro-Israel lobby’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HC24Ak02.html March 24, 2006).

It was pointed out above that in 1991 lantos miraculously found an eye witness who saw iraqi soldiers stealing baby incubators from a kuwaiti hospital. Did this eye witness fool lantos or was lantos fooling the american congress and the american people? "Tom Lantos, Israel's main agent in Congress (and that takes some doing in a field thick with competitors) wants to put the squeeze on Iran which is not surprising because he wants to put the squeeze on any country or group that Israel perceives as an enemy. What is a mystery is that Lantos, who represents the southern half of the "progressive" city of San Francisco gets a virtual waiver from the anti-war groups there. Why don't ANSWER and UFPJ raise their voices against him? (What gives Lantos the edge in the Israeli agent sweeps is that, according to the Jerusalem Post, he represents Israel in countries where the Zionist state has no diplomatic representation. Apparently, he visits them to threaten them in Israel's (and Washington's) name." (Jeff Blankfort ‘US congressmen (Lantos again) press for Iran sanctions bill’ jblankfort@earthlink.net March 09th 2006).

"The Rev. Pat Robertson, the prominent American televangelist and "Christian Zionist," says the felling of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon with a massive stroke is punishment from God "for dividing the Land of Israel." According to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Robertson, speaking on the 700 Club on Thursday, said that both Sharon and former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin ­ murdered by an Israeli extremist in 1995 ­ were victims of retaliation by God Himself. Saith Robertson: "He was dividing God's land. And I would say, Woe unto any prime minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the E.U., the United Nations, or the United States of America. God says, This land belongs to me. You better leave it alone." Robertson, the Protestant dispensationalist fanatic who is a more fervent Zionist than even the prime minister of Israel, speaks of "appeasing" the United States of America as if it were a foreign country ­ or, at any rate, not his country, but something equally foreign and, presumably, repugnant ­ to him as the EU and the UN." (Justin Raimondo ‘Sharon's Epitaph’ January 6, 2006).

"These (iran) war propagandists, including Clinton, make only the most tenuous connection between American interests and the Iranians' alleged forced march to acquire nukes. Instead, they make the argument in favor of ratcheting up the conflict with Iran in terms of the necessity of protecting Israel. Clinton's speech is infused with this militant Israeli patriotism: "The security and freedom of Israel must be decisive and remain at the core of any American approach to the Middle East. This has been a hallmark of American foreign policy for more than 50 years and we must not ­ dare not ­ waver from this commitment." While Israel is an American ally, so are Saudi Arabia and Jordan. And don't forget the newly installed "democratic" and supposedly pro-American government of Iraq. Israel "at the core" of U.S. policy in the Middle East? I don't think so. Such an Israelicentric viewpoint, while not out of place in an Israeli politician, seems just a mite strange coming from an American ­ even if she is a senator from New York. It ought to go without saying that the foundations of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East ­ or anywhere else ­ have to be predicated on purely American interests, and that the "core" of that policy has to be our own economic well-being, which is inextricably linked to the stability of the region." (Justin Raimondo ‘Hillary Clinton, War Goddess’ January 23, 2006).

In america, as in a number of other countries, jewish power does not consist solely of the well known jol. By itself the lobby is powerful but not overwhelmingly so. It is its ability to conspire with other sources of jewish power in america that makes the jol so dominant.

Prior the 1970s, harvard university was commonly regarded as a symbol of wasp power in america. It was an important pillar propping up america’s ruling wasp elite. It was the most prestigious higher educational institution in america educating and training young wasps to become part of the country’s establishment.

The two primary factors involved in the jewish colonization of american institutions and the american people are money and fear. The more businesses that american jews create or acquire, the more people they employ. These employees realize that in order to improve their career prospects they have to adopt the values of their jewish employers/managers. In other words, ‘Social being determines consciousness.’ If people work in a jewish owned/managed industry they have to become ‘jewish’. These days, american jews own vast slabs of the american economy and employ millions, perhaps even tens of millions, of americans. That is a huge amount of influence over american society and american politics. These days anybody who desires a career in the media is required not merely to defend and praise the jos but lie for it.

What is so remarkable about americans today, given that america is a hyper-power, is their slavish devotion to another country, their identification with another country, their public expressions of loyalty to another country, and perhaps most shockingly of all, their willingness to lay down their lives, or the lives of other americans, for a country they have never visited, know virtually nothing about, and from which they are explicitly excluded. Sheldon richman comments on george bush’s unilateral declaration of support for the jos, "Asked recently about his position on Iran’s alleged nuclear ambitions, President Bush said, "I made it clear, and I’ll make it clear again, that we will use military might to protect our ally Israel." This statement brought precisely zero reaction from the public and the media. Do the American people fully appreciate that this president is committed to sending their sons and daughters to kill and die - yet again - in a foreign country? Leaving aside the reigning political mythology, by what moral principle does he pledge other people’s lives without their consent? It is bad enough to die for "one’s own" country, which, let’s face it, in practice always means for the exploiting elite who head the government. Being sent to die for another country’s elite is obscene. Would some of those at risk like to speak up before it’s too late?" (Sheldon Richman ‘Bush Pledges More Mayhem in the Middle East’ http://www.fff.org/comment/com0603j.asp March 31, 2006).

There has been a special relationship between america and britain since the british colonized the continent. Although americans managed to overthrow the shackles of british colonial rule, thereafter a strong bond continued to exist between the two countries. This is not surprising firstly, because there are close familial, commercial, and political, ties between the two peoples and, secondly, because they share a common language, common religions, and a common culture. This special relationship was reinforced by american interventionism in the first and second world wars. But, although these bonds are strong, america and britain remain separate countries with distinct, national interests. Americans would never identify themselves as british, and the british would never identify themselves as americans. Even more strikingly, americans didn’t intervene in two world wars because they loved the british people or because they wanted to preserve their special relationship with britain. They intervened to protect their own national and global interests. America wanted a politically stable europe, not merely in britain but france, italy, the netherlands, and germany, which would help to resist the spread of the soviet empire. It wanted a stable europe where it would be possible for american capitalists to invest their money and reap good rewards.

There are a number of vivid examples of pseudo-jews ­ americans who have become so psychologically corrupted by jewish wealth and power they regard themselves as jews and are thus willing to fight for jewish causes which damage their own country’s interests.

In effect, the jews have colonized america as they have colonized palestine. They have created a jewish state in america just as they have done in palestine. But american jews have not merely colonized america they have also colonized/zionized the american people. This is in stark contrast to their refusal to colonize the palestinians. The outcome of the jewish colonization process in america couldn’t be more different from that in palestine ­ although if current trends persist then one day americans might find themselves being treated like palestinians. It is vital to point out that if jews in palestine had colonized the palestinians in the same way as they have colonized americans then much of the world’s hatred for the racist jos would have long since dissipated.

Rachel corrie is an example of america’s willingness to sacrifice its own citizens for the greater good of the jos. She is a symbol of america’s national humiliation, but for the exact opposite reason to colin powell. Corrie was an american hero imbued with american values who was murdered in the jos by a jewish bulldozer operator who deliberately drove over her whilst she was protesting about the demolition of a palestinian home. The american government made no effort to obtain justice for her from the jos. On the contrary, the jewish occupied bush administration was more concerned about maintaining its amicable relationship with the jos than it was with carrying out its prime duty ­ the protection of its own citizens. Imagine the bush administration’s outcry if corrie had been killed under similar circumstances in iran. America’s ruling jewish elite is not in the slightest bit interested in the welfare or the security of american citizens ­ only with the welfare and security of the jews living in palestine. "The bulldozer, driven by an Israeli army soldier on assignment to demolish the home, rolled over Corrie, who was 23 years old. She had taken a nonviolent position for human rights; she lost her life as a result. But she was rarely praised in the same U.S. media outlets that had gone into raptures over the image of a solitary unarmed man standing in front of Chinese tanks at the time of the Tiananmen Square massacre." (Norman Solomon ‘Mearsheimer, Walt and Corrie: The Lobby and the Bulldozer’ http://www.counterpunch.org/solomon04132006.html April 13, 2006).

In this work, an effort has been made to distinguish between american jews and jews in america. The reasons for trying to make this distinction are not merely confined to the issue of jewish loyalty/traitorousness to america. Another reason is that the potential ambiguity in jewish identity also has an impact on americans’ sense of identity. To a large extent people establish their sense of identity in comparison to the identities of others. As a consequence, the deliberate ambiguities in jewish identities in america may play a contributory role in confusing americans about their own sense of national identity.

It is quite true that american wasps still have sufficient money and manpower at their disposal to regain control of their country and reshape their foreign policies to promote their own interests rather than continuing to implement those determined by the jol/jos. It is difficult to disagree with michael neumann’s insight, "The real culprits in the story of Jewish influence in America are the people who let it all happen. These are the non-Jewish Americans who, in their opposition to Israel, are so timid that a couple of words from Alan Dershowitz would send them all scuttling like cockroaches back to their dark corners. The few who go further are not 'silenced' by Jewish power. One hears from them all the time: ask a Chinese or Iraqi or former Chilean dissident what 'silenced' means. They are ineffective because they haven't even tried to organize themselves, shrinking from the unpleasantness of offending the 'courageous' Jewish left. One thinks of the immortal words of George Carlin: "Take a fucking risk, for Christ's sake!"" (Michael Neumann ‘Blame Yourself: American Power and Jewish Power’ http://www.counterpunch.org/neumann01072003.html January 7, 2003). The fact that american wasps do not take up this opportunity is due to a variety of reasons.

Firstly, there are no wasp centres of power left in america which could serve as a base for wasps to reclaim their former dominance. Raimondo asks the rhetorical question, "Who will lobby Congress to start putting America first?" (Justin Raimondo ‘Steppingstone to War’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8914 April 28, 2006).The answer is that even though wasps need to defend their interests there is no organization left to do so. A number of prestigious american universities are funded by jews and the rest of america’s higher education sector is controlled by jews within the bush administration. There are more jewish think tanks than any other ethnic think tanks. The media is dominated by jews so even if a wasp organization was founded to lobby for americans they wouldn’t get much publicity for it. The congress is controlled by american jews. The political parties are controlled by american jews. It is impossible to avoid jewish power centres in america ­ what it is impossible to do is to spot a significant wasp power centre.

Secondly, in the mid 1970s american jews deliberately financed, cultivated, and publicized, a tiny, obscure, group of christian crackpots who promoted a bizarre religious orientation to the jos. Over the last three decades this sect has grown until it now has the allegiance of tens of millions of respectable americans. Although this group is commonly referred to as christian zionists they are much more accurately described as dedeamericanized, dechristianized zionists.

Thirdly, this same process has been employed in virtually all the other spheres of american political and social life. Wasps have been zionized by the jewish dominated media and jewish dominated political parties so they have come to accept american jews’ view of what is in their interests. American jews have succeeded in persuading millions of americans to help them to promote the interests of the jos. Quite why vast numbers of americans from the richest and most powerful to the poorest and least powerful should want to sacrifice themselves for another country to which they could never belong points to a continual mass indoctrination on a national scale.

Some commentators look for a more palatable explanation of the role of american jews in america. But all they are doing is lying in order to avoid having to confront the reality of the jewish colonization of america/americans. "A consensus of Americans across party-lines and religious affiliation identify with Israel not because they do the bidding of the Elders of Zion, but because they see it for what it is: a democratic state in a sea of Arab tyranny with its roots in a common Judeo-Christian civilization. No one has to bribe or hornswoggle ordinary Americans to back Israel. Whether they base their support on the Bible (as many American Christians do) or on sympathy with a fellow democracy afflicted by terrorists, the American love affair with the Jewish state has withstood the assaults of a biased media (another point Mearsheimer and Walt get completely wrong) and demagogic attacks from the extreme left or right." (Jonathan S. Tobin ‘The Paranoid Style of Politics’ http://www.jewishexponent.com/ViewArticle.asp?
ArtID=2893 March 30th 2006). If the explanation for americans’ bizarre slavery to the jos is either obedience to the elders of zion or support for a democratic jos then the former is much more plausible than the latter since the jos is not a democracy. The jos is more of a proto totalitarian state whose racist ideology leads it to terrorize its own citizens. "The "shared democracy" rationale is also weakened by aspects of Israeli democracy that are at odds with core American values. The United States is a liberal democracy where people of any race, religion, or ethnicity are supposed to enjoy equal rights. By contrast, Israel was explicitly founded as a Jewish state and citizenship is based on the principle of blood kinship. Given this conception of citizenship, it is not surprising that Israel’s 1.3 million Arabs are treated as second-class citizens, or that a recent Israeli government commission found that Israel behaves in a "neglectful and discriminatory" manner towards them." (John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ rwp_06_011_walt.pdf March 2006 p.9); "Israel a democracy? Not for the millions of Palestinian helots it rules. And what about the racist criteria for Israeli citizenship? If a Palestinian marries an Israeli, the former cannot [.pdf] be a citizen of Israel, nor even move there." (Justin Raimondo ‘The Lobby’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730 March 20, 2006); .. "that both the United States and Israel are virtual theocratic states, profoundly influenced by religious parties whose leaders are arrogant, racist, and militaristic, and who have posed persistent threats to international peace and security;" (Edward S. Herman and David Peterson ‘US Aggression-Time Once Again: Target Iran’ http://www.counterpunch.org/herman05112006.html May 11, 2006); "Nor, contrary to Zionist fantasy, is Israel a 'beacon of democracy' to any nation. For thirty years, Israel has granted no say in its government to the millions of Palestinians in the occupied territories, over whom it holds the power of life and death: if anything would sour Middle Eastern people of democracy, it would be Israel's version of it." (Michael Neumann ‘The Stability and Value of Israel’ http://www.counterpunch.org/neumann05132006.html May 13 / 14, 2006).

Jewish power in america is greater than in any other country but it exists in virtually every european country, and former european colonies, to one degree or another and in almost identical terms: the same jewish domination of the economy; the same jewish domination of the media, the same jol, the same jewish think tanks, etc. It is difficult to argue convincingly that specific american foreign policies are determined by the jol than by america’s own interests. But, from a more global perspective, it is easy to appreciate global jewish power from the fact that jews have determined the global political agenda since the mid 1970s.

The evidence for the jewish domination of america is so overwhelming as to be irrefutable. "There is just so much overwhelming evidence of the power of the Israel lobby …" (Philip Greenspan ‘Is The Israel Lobby Effective?’ http://www.swans.com/library/art12/pgreen87.html April 24, 2006). The real difficulty these days is finding evidence of wasp power in america. The american media is dominated by american jews. Virtually all of the country’s political parties from the biggest to the smallest are dominated by jews. This has created a remarkable political phenomena in which political debate is being fought out primarily between jews with varying degrees of loyalty to the jos from neoconservatives, neoliberals, neolefties, neopeaceniks, neogreens, to neolibertarians. The jol has a "stranglehold" on the american congress. Jews in the bush administration control many of the administration’s major departments and national security services. America’s defence strategy is now based on unilateralism, pre-emption, and monopoly power ­ all of which have been imported into america by jews from the jos. America’s jewish ruling elite have transformed america’s foreign policies so that they are almost identical to those being pursued by the jos. America’s bastions of wasp power have been replaced by bastions of jewish power such as the media, harvard university, and the military-industrial-jewish complex. The power of the jewish empire is so great it has forced america, the former leader of civilized world to join the jos as a rogue state, both of whom are now pariahs to the civilized world. There is no facet of america’s financial, economic, social, and political, life which is not financed by or controlled by jews whose prime loyalty is to the jos even when this is at the expense of america’s own national interests. The fact that the american administration is run overwhelmingly by jews can result only in one outcome ­ these jews will end up giving such preference to the jos that they undermine america’s own national and global interests. Basically, if a group of students is put in charge of a brewery then despite all promises as to their future good behaviour there is going to be only one outcome. As a consequence, "Israel has been forced by historical circumstances to lead the way for America, especially when it comes to militant Islamic terror and the kinds of hard choices a democracy has to make in combating it." John Podhoretz New York Post 01/29/03). "Benevolent global hegemony. Having defeated the "evil empire," the United States enjoys strategic and ideological predominance. The first objective of U.S. foreign policy should be to preserve and enhance that predominance by strengthening America's security, supporting its friends, advancing its interests, and standing up for its principles around the world." (William Kristol and Robert Kagan ‘Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy’ http://www.ceip.org/people/kagfaff.htm July/August 1996). Benevolent global hegemony is simply a code for jewish global domination.