List of Contents.
|
* the stabilization of the Earth's climate
through the Reforestation of the Earth i.e. the restoration of the Earth's
Photosynthetic capacity. The Earth's
Photosynthetic capacity is the primary factor stabilizing the Earth's climate
and the most important of the Earth's life sustaining processes;
* geophysiological equality between all countries. If all countries had to balance their Carbon budgets this would lead to the eradication of global poverty;
* geophysiological equality between the species - i.e. the creation of ooman-free Wilderness areas to guarantee Animal freedom;
* the creation of a sustainable world; and,
* the eradication of anthropocentrism - the
belief that oomans are the most important species on Earth.
The mundi club is neither left nor right but geocentric and sustainable - in other words, we analyze issues from the Earth's perspective and put the interests of the Earth First!
It is imperative to try to undermine anthropogenic concepts/phrases
such as 'homo sapiens', 'homo sapiens sapiens', 'civilization', and, perhaps
most laughably of all, 'humankind', 'mankind'. These words/phrases are
often used as if they were given to oomans by a divine being who'd come to the objective conclusion that
oomans are wonderful. Such concepts were, of course, invented by oomans to flatter their vanity and to cover up their vile, murderous activities.
They are the vocabulary of
oomano-imperialists. The word 'ooman' is a much more accurate reflection
of such odious, psychopathic, violent, irrational, critters. Oomans are
terrorists, the most appalling terrorists this planet has ever known.
The more civilized they pretend to be, the more murderous they become, the greater the mass murders they believe they are entitled to commit. They
spread terror amongst Animals wherever they go around the Earth. Even
so-called greens are terrorists since they support organic pharming -
and they're the ones who are supposed to be doing the most to combat the
horrors of Animal exploitation! In 2000, after the foot and mouth epidemic in brutland, so-called greens have been demanding the
return of local extermination camps (i.e. abattoirs)!!
The mundi club uses
lovelock's theory of geophysiology, the science of the Earth, as the theoretical foundation
for a geocentric philosophy and politics. However, it adds 'the Carbon theory of value' to lovelock's
scientific analysis. This theory starts with
two propositions. Firstly, that everything that oomans or Animals
do affects the Earth's climate. Secondly, given that the critical component of the Earth's highly complex, life sustaining,
processes is the Earth global Carbon spiral this could be used as a fairly accurate measure of the state of the Earth's life sustaining processes. Whilst it is next to impossible to measure every single ecological
facet of every single life sustaining process on Earth, it is feasible to measure the Earth's Carbon spiral.
Given that the Earth's Carbon spiral is a major
contributor to the Earth's climate then, ipso facto, it could be used to
measure oomans' (and Animals) impact on the climate. It is so comprehensive a phenomena that it could be used to measure the impact
of a solitary individual, a group of individuals, an industry, a city, region,
a country, or the entire ooman race.
The Carbon theory of value requires the
composition of an audit of the Earth's Carbon spiral. This would
indicate on the one hand, how much Carbon is released into the atmosphere by ooman activities
(i.e. Carbon exports) and, on the other hand, how much Carbon is
absorbed through Photosynthesis from the atmosphere by ooman activities (i.e. Carbon imports). If
ooman activities release more Carbon into the atmosphere than they absorb through
Photosynthesis then they can be deemed Carbon debtors who are destabilizing
the Earth's climate. Conversely, if they absorb more Carbon than they release
into the atmosphere they can be deemed to be Carbon creditors who are stabilizing
the Earth's climate. A Carbon audit of a range of ooman activities - whether
an industry, city, or country, etc - can then be compared with the Earth's Carbon
spiral as a whole to determine the significance of their impact on the climate.
The global Carbon audit would then be used to create
a global Carbon budget to stabilize the Earth's climate i.e. how much Carbon would be allowed into the atmosphere and how much Carbon would have to be extracted from the atmosphere, to stabilize the climate. This Carbon budget would be divided between all countries around the Earth so that all nations knew what their responsibilities were for combatting global burning. The Carbon theory of value also provides a quantifiable definition of sustainability and can be used to outline the structure
of a sustainable planet. The accounting system developed through the Carbon
theory of value is called 'Carbonomics'.
The mundi club's scientific understanding of the Earth derives primarily
from lovelock's new science of geophysiology. Lovelock is one of the world's
greatest scientists. We stand (or fall) by the scientific views of james
lovelock. There are no other green organizations which follow lovelock's
scientific analysis so closely - it has to be suspected that very few so-called
greens or environmentalists have even read lovelock's science of geophysiology
let alone understood it. However, the Carbon theory of value is the mundi
club's own theory - not lovelock's.
Sustainability.
The mundi club is the first to provide
a scientific
definition of sustainability. It is the only green group which
has a scientific definition of sustainability. This definition is quantifiable;
scientifically modelable; measures both ooman and environmental phenomena;
AND incorporates the Earth's Photosynthetic capacity which, for the last
two aeons or more, has been the basis of the Earth's climate stabilization
system, and is therefore the key component of the Earth's life support
system. Other formulations of sustainability are not quantifiable, comprehensive,
and often don't even include a reference to Photosynthesis. How, it might
be asked, is it possible for greens to have a definition of sustainability
when they do not mention any reference to the Earth's Photosynthetic capacity?
The mundi club is the only green group which has
formulated the structure of a sustainable planet. This has been possible
only because we have a scientific definition of sustainability. Other
green organizations have no interest in creating a sustainable planet
- which should not be too difficult to understand since they have no
definition of sustainability!
The mundi club uses its definition of sustainability
to measure oomans' impact on the environment. No other green organization
is capable of measuring oomans' impact on the environment because they
don't have a scientific definition of sustainability.
What is more, Carbonomics, the mundi club's environmental
accounting system, measures not only ooman activities but environmental
phenomena. It is able to measure ooman activities as easily as environmental
phenomena. No other green organization has an accounting system which
does this.
Other green organizations have not developed accounting
systems to measure ooman activities and environmental phenomena - indeed,
many refuse to apply environmental accounting systems to their own policies!
The mundi
club promotes geocentrism - the most comprehensive, and logically consistent,
green theory - deducing a philosophical and political edifice on the
foundations of geophysiology. A Sustainable Planet.
The mc uses its definition of sustainability
to formulate the structure of a sustainable
planet. This is the first time the science of the Earth has been
used to outline the political and economic structures of a planetary society.
The Earth's life support system consists
of a vast myriad of interacting, interconnected, and interlocking, life
sustaining processes. However, virtually all of these factors have been
created by, or are dependent (in one way or another) on, Photosynthesis.
The Earth's Photosynthetic capacity is not merely the basis of most of
the Earth's life sustaining processes, it is the most important factor
stabilizing the Earth's climate; a major component of the Earth's Carbon
spiral, and thus the key to the Earth's life support system. The mundi
club outlines the workings of the Earth's life support system.
|
![]() The mundi club believes oomans are currently engaged in the mass extinction of Wildlife. Such is the vast scale of this slaughter that it is deemed to be the sixth mass extinction that has happened
since the formation of the Earth over four billion years ago, "The rate
of extinction now is about what it was after the object that killed the
dinosaurs had struck." (Art Bell & Whitley Strieber). The previous five
mass extinctions were brought about by natural events. The sixth is caused
by a species which claims it is unique in its capability for making moral
judgments - and yet it chooses, of its own free will, to slaughter tens
of billions of wild Animals every year. It is trashing the greatest gift
that oomans have ever had. It is not a coincidence that the more of the
planet that oomans sequester, the greater the destabilization of the planet's climate
and the greater the destruction of the Earth's life support system
However, oomans are not merely devastating Wildlife. These preposterously a-moral, immoral, 'moral beings', are murdering up to a hundred billion slave Animals in concentration, and extermination, camps. The creation of concentration and extermination camps is turning oomans into eco-nazis. The fact that oomans are causing the sixth mass extermination throughout the Earth's entire history is proof that oomans are eco-nazis. In the process of decimating Animalkind, oomanocruels are destroying their own life support system on Earth. The mc believes oomancruels can still save themselves from a geocidal disaster. However, it is highly unlikely they will do so - the vast majority of oomans know little about how the Earth works, do not appreciate their role in this devastation, and care even less about it. If oomans don't know how the Earth works, how can they save their life support system and thus themselves?
Humans are the only creatures who are aware of living on a planet. They are
thus planetary beings. However, planetary beings have responsibilities
for taking care of the Earth i.e protecting Biodiversity, stabilizing
the climate, and creating a sustainable world. Oomans, on the other hand, do not regard themselves as planetary beings. If they are rich, they regard themselves as consumers. If they are poor, as people who ought to be consumers.
Oomans cannot be regarded as the most rational species on Earth for the simple reason that rational species do not trash their own life support system and commit oomanicide - and quite possibly geocide. Oomans are technologically minded livestock.
![]() The Need for an Epitaph.
The mundi club's website is basically an epitaph
for the ooman race. We judge oomans for what they are doing, their destructiveness and mass slaughter. We do not
pretend oomans are so environmentally sound their survival is not in
doubt. There is little prospect of oomans stopping themselves from destroying
much of the Earth's life support system. It is highly unlikely they will save themselves from
oblivion. Oomans will continue destroying
the Earth's life support system until much of the Earth's life support system
collapses.
The consequences of this ecocidal course of events are firstly, that the culprits will get off scot
free - in the sense that they will die alongside everyone else. They will
not be punished for their crimes. The mundi club believes it is
imperative to punish the culprits for what they are doing and prevent
them from escaping justice.
Secondly, if oomans are going to perish because of
the destruction they are wreaking on the Earth then it is vital to ensure they know
they are responsible and that they will perish. The mc believes it is imperative
to condemn oomans before the species slithers into oblivion. The last
thing we want is for oomans to crash into oblivion without understanding
that it is their fault and that it didn't have to
happen. We don't want doomans disappearing from the face of the Earth
believing they weren't responsible for the calamity because it was all
the fault of x, w, or z.
The Animal exploitation industry is by far and away the biggest
contributor to global burning.
MAKE THE EARTH-WRECKERS
FACE UP TO WHAT THEY ARE DOING -
MAKE THEM ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT THEY
ARE DOING.
The Countdown to Ooman Oblivion.
The real questions are not whether oomans can
survive on Earth but firstly, whether they deserve to survive and, secondly,
whether they will cause so much damage to the planet's life support system
that they will trigger off a chain of geophysiological devastation that will bring about runaway global burning that will eventually lead to the eradication not merely
of oomans but of all life on Earth. Not long to go now.
The mundi club is also the only green organization
around the world which believes that with sufficient information, it should
be possible to predict roughly when the demise of doomans will take place
- which will enable us to be there to celebrate the great occasion - and,
if necessary, finish off any malingerers.
![]() The Earth's Photosynthetic capacity is the main means by which
the Earth has stabilized the climate over the last two-three billion years. It
influences the climate in four ways: the Photosynthetic effect (extracting Carbon from the atmosphere); the greenhouse effect (dumping Carbon into the atmosphere); the albedo effect; and the heat effect.
Photosynthesis is not merely the base of the food chain for virtually
all life forms on Earth, it is a vital means for stabilizing the climate
- it is the essence of the Earth's life support system. The Earth regulates the climate through the
release of Carbon emissions AND the absorption of atmospheric Carbon.
Over the last few
million years, the Earth's Photosynthetic capacity has been dominated
primarily by the scale of the Earth's Forest cover. However, over the last few thousand years, oomans have been destabilizing
the climate by cutting down Forests around the Earth. The anthropogenic
stabilization of the climate therefore depends primarily on widescale
Reforestation, the regeneration of the Earth's life support system.
Mass Reforestation would have to take place
on a geophysiologically equitable basis so that all countries shared the
burden equally. This requires taking into account each countries' historical Carbon budgets.
Some of the new Forests which would be allowed to grow around the Earth would be used
to regulate the climate; some would have to be put aside as (ooman-free)
Wilderness areas; whilst the remainder would be regional Forests from
which oomans would draw resources. If oomans want to create a sustainable
planet they will have to rely primarily on renewable resources drawn from
regional Forests. Phytomass should provide all the raw materials, energy,
chemicals, food, and clothes, for a convivial existence.
![]() The mundi club's main contributions to green
theory are:
** geocentrism
The belief that all value derives from the Earth
and that it is imperative to look at political issues from the Earth's
perspective. This is similar to the ideas promoted by dave forman and Earth First! but not the same.
** the Carbon theory of value
This theory is based on the assumption
that everything that oomans do affects the climate. Given that the climate
is determined largely by the Earth's Carbon spiral then everything that
oomans do can be measured by the Earth's Carbon spiral.
** Carbonomics
This is an audit of the Earth's Carbon spiral which
can then be used to measure ooman activities and environmental phenomena.
It is the only green accounting system which can measure both ooman, and
environmental, factors. It can also be used to measure each species' Earth
value.
** Budgetary Politics
The mundi club was the first to advocate a budgetary form of
green politics in which both Carbon emissions AND Carbon absorption are
taken into account when assessing countries' environmental impact i.e. their contribution to the destabilization
of the climate.
** A Global Carbon Budget
The mundi club was the first to transform the scientific phrase 'a
global Carbon budget' into a political phrase.The audit of the Earth's
global Carbon spiral should be used to formulate a global Carbon budget.
Such a budget would introduce a more quantifiable approach to green politics rather
than the usual reliance on vague, meaningless, unquantifiable, exhortations
such as:
'living in harmony with nature'; 'treading lightly on the Earth'; 'sustainable development'; etc. Unfortunately, allthough the mundi club adopted the phrase 'the global
Carbon budget' specifically to include Reforestation, many of the green
organizations adopting the phrase have divested it of such a commitment.
The First Scientifically measureable definition of
Sustainability.
The mundi club was the first to put foward
a scientifically measureable definition of sustainability
The first to Outline the Structure of a sustainable Planet
The mundi club was the first to use a definition of sustainability
to outline the structure of a sustainable planet. Green organizations
in brutland such as foE and the green party claim to promote sustainable
societies but they don't promote policies for a sustainable planet.
Geophysiological Equality
The mundi club promotes the principle of
geophysiological equality in which all countries balance their historical
Carbon budgets. This determines each countries' entitlements for using
the Earth's finite life support system. Since it is not possible for any
environmental theory to determine the number of cars, kids, or commodities,
there should be in each country, a Carbon budget determines what their
Carbon income/expenditure would be so it is up to each country/region
to determine what they want to spend their limited Carbon resources on.
If a country spends all of its Carbon entitlement on rearing more kids,
then it would have less for cars, etc. The budget on the exploitation
of Carbon would provide an incentive for countries to promote resource
conservation/efficiency. The greater the conservation/efficiency, the
better their standard of living would become.
Repayment of Carbon Debts
The mundi club was first to demand that the over-industrialized nations
should repay their historical Carbon debts to the industrializing
nations.
The Differences between Renewable and
Alternative Forms of Energy.
The mundi club was the first to distinguish
between renewable and alternative forms of energy. The mundi club
opposes all forms of alternative energy except for small-scale i.e. domestic/neighbourhood
appliances.
The Earth's Photosynthetic Capacity
The mc invented the phrase the Earth's Photosynthetic capacity. It was the first to suggest that the Earth's Photosynthetic capacity
is not merely the start of the food chain but is the main component
of the Earth's climate stabilization system and thus the essence of the
Earth's life support system. The mc was the first to equate the Earth's
Photosynthetic capacity with the Earth's climate stabilization system.
The Four components of Global Burning
The mundi club was the first to point out that global burning consists
of four components:
the greenhouse effect (the release of Carbon emissions); the Photosynthetic effect (the absorption of atmospheric Carbon); the albedo effect; and, the heat effect. Humans are Planetary Beings
The mundi club was the first to describe oomans as planetary beings. By
this we don't mean the jet setting inhabitants of a global village but people who have
local, regional, national, global, and planetary, perspectives and responsibilities.
Greens' opposition to Reforestation.
The mundi club was the first to point out
the quite shocking fact that greens, and many scientists, oppose Reforestation
as a means of combatting global burning - they are what we call the greenless
greens. The mc has currently unearthed 43 green objections to Reforestation
- and we're still counting!! The mc was also the first to point out that
the greenless greens, were in reality a
front for the livestock pharming industry little different from the countryside
alliance.
Greens have no definition of Sustainability
The mc wasn't the first to point out that greens don't have a definition
of sustainability nor a vision of a sustainable planet, "No
environmental organization in Britain is offering a vision of what a sustainable
society might be like and how we might get there." (Green Magazine August
1993 p.37). But it was the first to suggest that if they don't then they're
as bad as the Earth wreckers.
![]() How to Save the Earth. The Utter Insanity of Supply Side Economics.
If you believe:-
the best way to keep
homes warm is to construct more power stations;
the best way to combat disease and ill health is by erecting more multi-storey hospitals; the best way to reduce vehicle exhaust emissions is to construct more motorways; the best way to solve homelessness is to build more homes; the best way to combat crime is to build more prisons; the best way to solve waste disposal problems is to open more rubbish tips or build more waste incinerators; the best way to supply more water is to build more water reservoirs; the best way to dispose of sewage is to build longer outflow pipes; the best way to eradicate unemployment is to create more jobs; the best way to conserve resources is to exploit them; the best way to conserve Wildlife is to shoot them; the best way to combat the greenhouse effect is through the conservation of energy; the best way to protect the environment is to increase economic growth, and; the best way of keeping the Planet green is to cover it in cement; then clearly there is only conclusion
you can reach,
THE BEST WAY TO SAVE THE PLANET IS TO DESTROY IT![]() Every schoolkid knows that the concentration
of Carbon in the atmosphere depends on the relationship between rate of Carbon emissions into the atmosphere
and the rate of extraction of Carbon from the atmosphere by Photosynthesis. Quite
amazingly, however, ever since 1989 when scientists first publicly demanded
action to curb anthropogenically induced global warming (hereinafter referred to as global burning), scientists have demanded action solely on reducing
Carbon emissions from fossil fuels. Politicians and environmentalists have followed in their
footsteps. As a consequence, the fossil fuel industries, and the urban consumers/industries which use fossil fuels, have been blamed for global burning.
The hypothesis that global burning is caused solely
by urban consumers and urban industries consuming fossil fuels is basically propaganda
generated by the landowning pharming elite (especially those in the
over-industrialized nations) to cover up their devastation of the
Earth's Forests. The Earth's Forests are the most important part of
the Earth's Photosynthetic capacity, which is the most crucial part
of the Earth's climate stabilization system which, in turn, is the most
essential part of the Earth's life support system. Over the last couple of millenia the pharming industry, primarily the Animal exploitation industry, has transformed nearly a third of the Earth's land surface, much of it Forested, into pastureland. The biggest cause
of the destabilization of the Earth's climate is not the fossil fuel
industries but the global pharming industry. The worst Earth wrecking
industry is the global pharming industry which includes both the
highly intensive, industrial, pharming industry but the organic pharming
industry. Historically, organic pharmers have been responsible for decimating
most of the world's Forests - and it is they who will become ascendant
if the intensive factory pharm system is abolished.
There are a number of reasons why, since 1989, the green movement has supported the seemingly scientific hypothesis that global
burning is caused primarily by the release of greenhouse gases from the fossil fuels consumed by urban industries and urban people:-
firstly, many greens are pharmers;
secondly, many of the green movement's leading figures are members of the landowning, pharming elite e.g. lord melchett of greenpeace and lord porritt of Green World;
thirdly, rich, middle class, greens who live in urban areas want holiday homes in the countryside to escape suburbia;
fourthly, many of the greens who live in urban areas want to move into rural areas where they can own a small plot of land and grow their own food. Poor greens want to move to the countryside to own
some land on which they can support themselves - even though there is
a lot of vacant land to grow crops in urban areas;
fifthly, radical greens such as the 'land is ours' portray
themselves as modern day diggers but some end up trying to expropriate land in national
parks because they want to enjoy the same vast financial and political
privileges which the landowning elite have obtained for themselves.
The motto of the land is ours seems to be if you can't beat 'em, join
'em.
In brutland, alliances are currently being forged
or reinforced between aristocratic greens, pharmers, the Countryside alliance, Pharmers
for free petrol, and the landowning elite:-
In autumn 2000, a faction of the national pharmers
union triggered off the 'fuel tax' protests, even though pharmers would
not benefit financially from a reduction in fuel prices, in order to put
pressure on the government to increase state subsidies for pharmers. It also
sought closer ties with the Countryside Alliance.
Robin page of the 'ecologist
magazine' was a vehement supporter of the Pharming Reactionaries.
The 'ecologist' supports mark purdey's explanation
of the bse crisis. This explanation is being publicized by increasing
numbers of rancid right wing commentators because, if it was true, it
would lead to further compensation payments to pharmers even though
they've already had £4 billion in state compensation to replace the Animals they lost through the bse epidemic and countless billions for what is called 'set aside' - sitting
around on their fat arses doing nothing.
Like the rest of the degenerate, brutish
green movement 'the ecologist' blames the fossil fuel
industries and urban people for global burning whilst ignoring the vast environmental damage caused by pharmers.
The mundi club is totally opposed to the world trade
organization but is thankful that it is driving pharmers off the land
across europe and the rest of the world because it is only when large
sections of the world are free of small scale pharming that it's going
to be possible to expropriate the mega-pharming corporations and then
Reforest the land to stabilize the climate much of which will have to be given back to Wildlife. We celebrate these consequences of globalization as currently the ONLY FORCES MOVING IN THE DIRECTION
OF THE CREATION OF A SUSTAINABLE PLANET. Small scale pharmers are the most vehement supporters of large scale pharming so by undermining the former it will be easier to tackle the latter.
Greens not merely support pharmers. They are oomano-imperialists
who want to colonize every habitat on Earth and thus oomanize the entire
planet. They want to enslave every Animal on the planet. They believe,
like right wing, free market loonies, that Wildlife is going to
survive only if it becomes a resource which can be profitably exploited by oomans. It is believed that if oomans can make profits from the exploitation of Animals then they
will try to conserve those Animals - but only as long as they are able
to make a profit from such Animals. The greens, like free marketeers, believe
in the astoundingly degenerate view that 'Animals have got to pay
their way if they are going to survive'. It is as if oomans have suddenly
started looking upon themselves as masters of the Earth who can thus
tell the Earth that unless it pays it's way then it will have to go.
This clearly reveals that oomans are standing on their heads. On a living
planet it is oomans who have got to pay their way to the Earth not the
other way around.
As a consequence of their support for organic pharming
and pharmers' anti fossil fuel industry propaganda, virtually all so-called
green organizations dismiss Reforestation as a means of combatting global
burning.
There is a clear, unambiguous choice facing all greens
- support organic pharming, the Animal enslavement industry, and wholesale
deforestation, OR support Reforestation in order to stabilize the climate and provide Wildlife with the opportunity they need to survive.
Contrary to the views of virtually all greens around the world Old Growth Forests are the best means for absorbing and storing atmospheric Carbon. However, it is not merely old growth Forests that are the
best means for combatting global burning - it is ooman
free, old growth Forests because as soon as oomans are allowed into
such places they start:-
exterminating Wildlife,
causing fires,
dumping rubbish preventing the decomposition of organic material and,
compacting the soil -
all of which leads to a dramatic decline in Carbon absorption.
Of course there is no real choice facing greens -
if they continue to support organic pharming and thereby oppose Reforestation,
then they are not greens at all but Earth rapists who have infiltrated
the green movement to divert public attention away from the fundamental goal
of creating a sustainable planet. All pharmers have a utilitarian perspective on the land - how can they extract as much profit from it as they can. This is no way to treat the Earth.
The global pharming industry is perfectly willing
to slaughter billions of Animals, infect millions of people with deadly
diseases from the rearing of livestock Animals, and even bring down governments. The green movement has got
to make up its mind whether it wants to form a partnership with the
organic, green welly, pharming brigade or the Animal rights movement.
Does it want to create a sustainable planet or is it intent on carrying
on the devastation of the Earth's life support system by pretending
that it is protecting the environment?
|
Top of Page |
MUNDI CLUB HOME AND INTRO PAGES - Mundi Home - - Mundi Intro |
JOURNALS - Terra / Terra Firm / Mappa Mundi / Mundimentalist / Doom Doom Doom & Doom / Special Pubs / Carbonomics |
TOPICS - Zionism / Earth / Who's Who / FAQs / Planetary News / Bse Epidemic |
ABOUT THE MUNDI CLUB - Phil & Pol / List of Pubs / Index of Website / Terminology / Contact Us |
All publications are copyrighted mundi
club © You are welcome to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy. |
We welcome additional
information, comments, or criticisms. Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/ |
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/ |