Allegations concerning jewish involvement in america’s hi-tech telecommunications’ industry giving mossad the opportunity to spy on american politicians/citizens emerged at the turn of the millenium. "In December 2001, two months after the September 11 terrorist attacks, reports reemerged, again citing "federal sources", about the involvement of Israeli technology companies in US espionage activities. In a series of shows, "Fox News" correspondent Carl Cameron claimed that, in the late 1990s, the FBI and other agencies had investigated Amdocs "more than once". In 1999, the US National Security Agency (NSA) warned that electronic records telephone calls in the US had reached Israeli hands, according to Cameron. In another report, Cameron said Comverse Technology Inc. (Nasdaq: CMVT) subsidiary Comverse Infosys, a provider of surveillance equipment to US law enforcement agencies, was itself conducting secret wiretapping through a back door in the equipment it installed. This was not a marginal report or a loony medium. Fox is the leading television news channel, with twice as many viewers as CNN. Nor is Cameron small fry. He is now "Fox News" chief White House correspondent. Nor is "Fox News" hostile towards Israel; on the contrary, it is considered the most pro-Israel television news channel in the US. This may explain why it erased Cameron’s reports from its website a few days after they were broadcast. The reports can now only be found in electronic archives." (Ran Dagoni ‘From AIPAC to Check Point’ http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000069942&fid=980 March 9th 2006). Even if such stories are entirely bogus, there will be many american politicians who might wonder whether there is any truth in them and thus curb what they say just in case there is.

American jews own substantial parts of america’s armaments’ industries. "We constantly hear about Dick Cheney's ties to Halliburton and how his ex-company is making bundles off U.S. contracts in Iraq. But what we don't hear about is how Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein and her husband are also making tons of money off the "war on terror." The wishy-washy senator now claims Bush misled her prior to the invasion of Iraq. I don't think she's being honest with us, though. There may have been other reasons she helped sell Bush's lies. According to the Center for Public Integrity, Feinstein's husband Richard Blum has racked in millions of dollars from Perini, a civil infrastructure construction company, of which the billionaire investor wields a 75 percent voting share. In April 2003, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers gave $500 million to Perini to provide services for Iraq's Central Command. A month earlier in March 2003, Perini was awarded $25 million to design and construct a facility to support the Afghan National Army near Kabul. And in March 2004, Perini was awarded a hefty contract worth up to $500 million for "electrical power distribution and transmission" in southern Iraq. Feinstein, who sits on the Senate Appropriations Committee as well as the Select Committee on Intelligence, is reaping the benefits of her husband's investments. The Democratic royal family recently purchased a $16.5 million mansion in the flush Pacific Heights neighborhood of San Francisco. It's a disgusting display of war profiteering, and just like Cheney, the leading Democrat should be called out for her offense." (Joshua Frank ‘Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering’ http://www.antiwar.com/frank/?articleid=8609 February 28, 2006).

"Blum shares a large stake in Perini, a civil construction company that is happily employed in Iraq and Afghanistan. But not all of Blum's war profits come from Perini. In 1975, his venture capital firm went after fledging construction and design company URS when the business was about to be bought out by another corporation. Since then, Blum has increased his stock in URS, capitalizing on its recent military contracts. Unlike Blum's dabbling with Barnum & Bailey, his current profits aren't so safe for child consumption. Here are the basics to date: Blum currently holds over 111,000 shares of stock in URS Corporation, which is now one of the top defense contractors in the United States. Blum is an acting director of URS, which bought EG&G, a leading provider of technical services and management to the U.S. military, from The Carlyle Group in 2002. Carlyle's trusty advisers, past and present, include former President George H.W. Bush, James Baker, and ex-SEC Commissioner Arthur Levitt, among other prominent neoconservatives and Washington power brokers. URS and Blum have since banked on the Iraq war, scoring a phat $600 million contract through EG&G. As a result, URS has seen its stock price more than triple since the war began in March 2003. Blum has cashed in over $2 million on this venture alone and another $100 million for his investment firm. "As part of EG&G's sale price," reports the San Francisco Chronicle, "Carlyle acquired a 21.74 percent stake in URS ­ second only to the 23.7 percent of shares controlled by Blum Capital." The Carlyle Group has long been accused of exploiting its political connections to turn a profit. And if Carlyle can come under the microscope for its government ties and war profiteering, as it did in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, than surely Blum's URS ought to be subject to the same scrutiny." (Joshua Frank ‘The Democrats' Daddy Warbucks’ http://www.antiwar.com/frank/?articleid=8618 March 1, 2006).

Blum is able to buy a lot of political party, and congressional, support with the profits he has made from the invasion of iraq, "Sen. Dianne Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum, could well be called the Democrats' Daddy Warbucks. He's scored bundles from war contracts. He has recently purchased a $16.5 million crib in San Francisco and along with his wife has handed hundreds of thousands of dollars over to fellow Democrats. Since the 2000 election cycle, Blum has contributed over $75,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Committee, and thousands more to individual Democrats, including John Kerry, Robert Byrd, Joe Lieberman, Ted Kennedy, and Barbara Boxer." (Joshua Frank ‘The Democrats' Daddy Warbucks’ http://www.antiwar.com/frank/?articleid=8618 March 1, 2006).

The second major jewish input to the military-industrial-jewish complex is that the jol regularly takes members of the american military on all expenses paid trips to the jos. "The bulk of JINSA's modest annual budget is spent on taking a bevy of retired US generals and admirals to Israel, where JINSA facilitates meetings between Israeli officials and the still-influential US flag officers, who, upon their return to the States, happily write op-eds and sign letters and advertisements championing the Likudnik line. (Sowing seeds for the future, JINSA also takes US service academy cadets to Israel each summer and sponsors a lecture series at the Army, Navy and Air Force academies). In one such statement, issued soon after the outbreak of the latest intifada, twenty-six JINSAns of retired flag rank, including many from the advisory board, struck a moralizing tone, characterizing Palestinian violence as a "perversion of military ethics" and holding that "America's role as facilitator in this process should never yield to America's responsibility as a friend to Israel," as "friends don't leave friends on the battlefield."" (Jason Vest ‘The Men From JINSA and CSP’ http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&s=vest 15.8.2002). These freebie jaunts to the jos are not intended to provide jews with an opportunity to indoctrinate their american guests. Nor are they supposed to provide opportunities for the jewish secret services to compromise their important guests ­ although this has happened. Nor are they intended merely to generate a sense of loyalty to the jos. The primary reason for the jaunts to the racist hate state in palestine is to enable members of the jos to conduct in depth negotiations with these retired military leaders to ascertain their political value in america and then to determine the scale, and type, of the bribe needed to win their support for policies the jos hopes will be promoted by the american government. The greater the political/military/financial services they can render to the jos the greater the funding they will receive.

So what, it might be said? What possible influence could former military officers wield over the current military hierarchy? As it turns out, it’s quite substantial. "In Exodus, the Fourth Plague sent upon the Egyptians was a plague of flies. A similar plague of flies has settled on the U.S. military, in the form of a swarm of retired senior officers working as contractors. Not satisfied with their generous pensions, they wheedle six-figure contracts out of senior officer "buddies" still on active duty. In return for steam shovel loads of the taxpayers' money, they offer "advice" that is, overwhelmingly, flyspeck. The problem is that these contractors are businessmen, and business is a whore. The goal of business is profit, not truth. Profit requires getting the next contract. Getting the next contract means telling whomever gave you the current contract what he wants to hear. If what he wants to hear isn't true, so what? Just start the "study" by writing the desired conclusion, then bugger the evidence to fit. The result is endless intellectual corruption, billions of dollars wasted and military services that, as institutions, can no longer think. The plague of senior officer contractors has effectively pushed those still in the military out of the thought process. Meeting after meeting on issues of doctrine on concepts are dominated by contractors. The officers in the room know that if they wave the BS flag at the contractors, they risk angering the serving senior officers who have given their "buddies" the contract. Junior officers, who have the most direct experience with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, are completely excluded. They have no chance of being heard in meetings dominated by retired generals and colonels." (William S. Lind ‘The Fourth Plague Hits the Pentagon’ http://www.counterpunch.org/lind04112006.html April 11, 2006).

Thirdly, the jol is able to use its political muscle to influence the political craeers of former military leaders. No military leader wants to retire from the military and find his political career ruined because he has not done what is expected of him by america’s jewish rulers. "At present, however, members of Congress from all regions are still reluctant to offend a single-issue lobby that can and will subsidise their opponents; many journalists and policy experts say in private that they are afraid of being blacklisted by editors and publishers who are zealous Israel supporters; top jobs in the US national security apparatus routinely go to individuals with close personal and professional ties to Israel and its American lobby; and soldiers and career diplomats are sometimes smeared in whisper campaigns if they thwart the goals of Israeli governments. In these circumstances, how could US policy not be biased in favour of Israel? (Michael Lind ‘The Israel Lobby’ April 1, 2002).

Fourthly, jewish political power in american governments can be used to extract concessions from the american military that benefit the jos rather than america. "For example top US Generals have frequently complained that Israeli armed forces receive new high tech military hardware before it has become operational in the US. Thanks to the Lobby, their complaints are rarely heeded. US defense industries (some of whom have joint production contracts with Israeli military industries) have bitterly complained of Israel’s unfair competition, violation of trade agreements and the illegal sale of high tech weaponry to China." (James Petras ‘Noam Chomsky and the Pro-Israel Lobby: Fourteen Erroneous Theses’ March 2006).

The idea of american wasps controlling the world’s mightiest military and using it to promote only american interests around the world, is an antiquated view of the world. It is, however, a politically useful illusion since it allows america’s jewish elite to cover up its parasitic control of the american political system.

Jews in america have created a taboo against any public debate concerning the issue of jewish political power in america (as elsewhere around the western world), "It is an old canard that Jews control America and American foreign policy," Foxman said. "During both world wars, anti-semites said that Jews manipulated America into war." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘A War for Israel’ http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html April 2004). But what better way is there of camouflaging jewish world domination than behind such a hoary old canard? Indeed, the fact that this taboo has become an accepted norm throughout the western world is yet one more piece of evidence pointing to the existence of jewish world domination.

The proposition that america is the world’s hyper-power implies the jos is an American colony - dependent on America’s military, technological, and economic, support for survival. However, the evidence points overwhelming in the opposite direction - that america has become a jewish colony.

The fact that jews in america write, lobby, and sponsor, legislation beneficial to the jos rather than america, which is then passed by jewish members of congress and members bribed by the jol, indicates the existence of a jewish state operating within the decrepit remnants of the former wasp controlled american state. The jol, the jewish neocons, the jewish/jewish-owned, members of congress, and the jews in the american administration, in conjunction with america’s jewish academia/think tanks and jewish owned media, act like a jewish state within the american state. The major political benefit of this jewish state within the american state is that it enables american jews to operate wasp marionettes who make public statements written and devised by jews whose prime concern is the expansion of the jos. Since the first proxy zionist war in 1991, the american congress has become a façade for a branch of the jewish knesset operating in america. Since 2001, the american presidency has become a façade for the jos. The american state has become the biggest outpost of the global jewish empire controlled by the jos. "Neocons are fanatics. They would certainly risk U.S. troops to achieve their agenda. If neocons can provoke the Shia militias into joining the attacks on U.S. troops, the situation would quickly spin out of control. To avoid a crushing defeat, Bush could resort to extreme means. Neoconservatives don't want "no stinking talks." They want war. War is their only hope. Neoconservatives are ruthless. They have control of the U.S. government and military. Little stands between them and their fanatical determination to widen war in the Middle East." (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Israeli Electorate Rebukes Bush’ http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=8783 March 30, 2006).

There is no other ethnic group in the world which has so much political power in so many different countries as the jews ­ not the americans, nor the british, the french, nor the spanish. The americans might have a military hyper-power and american embassies might have direct links to many foreign governments but since american administrations are dominated by jews it is they who use america’s diplomatic power to further jewish interests in those countries.

The ultimate jewish lobbying organization is the jos since it possesses nuclear weapons to provide security not merely for jews in palestine but jews living in all other countries around the world. The jews are about to create a formal global structure, tied to the jos, in order to enhance the jos’s role as protector of ‘jews’ and jewish interests around the world. "The first meeting of the World Jewish Forum (WJF), an international consultative body, will take place at Beit Hanassi this October with a gathering of 200-300 leaders of world Jewry, Robert Goodkind, President of the American Jewish Committee, announced on Sunday. The WJC initiative springs from a call by President Moshe Katsav for the establishment of a sort of "Second House" as a consultative body alongside the Knesset to add its voice to discussions on issues that affected not only the citizens of a Jewish state, but Jews everywhere." (Greer Fay Cashman Jerusalem Post ‘Date Set for World Jewish Forum’ March 20th 2006). It should be pointed out that the phrase "jews everywhere" is inherently racist. But this is what jewish racists have in common with their racist enemies, the anti-semites. Both deem those with a jewish genetic heritage who are living outside the jos to be jews even though they not.

The jewish-owned media in america, working in allegiance with the jewish think tanks, the jews in american administrations, and the jol, pursues five main policies.

After the collapse of the soviet empire, a group of jews in russia seemingly steeped in ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’, lied, cheated, stole, and murdered, their way into taking over virtually all of russia’s biggest industries. They used gangs (some of which probably included mossad agents) to intimidate and murder their opponents in order to gain control of between 70-85% of russia’s industries including most of its natural resources. "Prior to being placed as a cultural editor of a leading right-wing Danish daily, from 1990 to 1995 "Rose" (flemming rose the editor of Jyllands-Posten which published anti-islamic cartoons in september 2005) was a Moscow-based reporter who translated into Danish a self-serving auto-biography by Boris Yeltsin, godchild of the pro-Israeli, post-communist Russian oligarchs, most of whom held dual citizenship and collaborated with the Mossad in laundering illicit billions." (James Petras and Robin Eastman-Abaya ‘The Caricatures in Middle East Politics’ February 19, 2006). They also took control of russia’s media which they then used to elect boris yeltsin as president despite the fact that he was virtually a brain-dead, vodka soaked, alcoholic. Within a matter of years these jewish traitors in russia had stolen vast quantities of russian assets thereby transforming themselves into billionaires. They exported as much as possible of their ill-gotten wealth to the jos just in case the russians might ask for their money back. "Washington backed the illegal seizure of power by Yeltsin and then provided backing for his corrupt, destructive, oligarchic regime that literally destroyed the Russian economy and society. In the course of supporting Yeltsin, the US financial system received hundreds of billions of dollars in illegal transfers by US backed oligarchs. Europe and the US joined in partnership with the oligarchs to plunder Russia’s oil and gas resources." (James Petras ‘The meaning of war: A heterodox perspective’ http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=12606 January 2005).

In the beginning, there were reputedly only seven oligarchs in russia ­ of whom 6 were jewish. By the end of 2003 it was estimated there were seventeen, "Khodorkovsky is one of Russia's "oligarchs," a group of 17 billionaires who acquired sudden wealth in the 1990s after the Soviet Union collapsed and they bought government properties at fire-sale prices. Polls show that most Russians deeply resent the oligarchs. Most of them are young; Khodorkovsky is 40. And many of them, including Khodorkovsky, are Jewish."" (William Schneider ‘Putin's Arresting Move’ American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research http://www.aei.org/news/newsID.19403,filter./news_detail.asp October 31, 2003); "As the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz explains: "In recent years Russian authorities began investigating [Yukos], its managers and major stockholders, many of whom are of Jewish origin. The probes caused several of the managers to flee to Israel, and resulted in Khodorkovski's [Yukos CEO] arrest and a Kremlin attack on Yukos." (Alison Weir ‘Russia, Israel and Media Omissions’ http://www.counterpunch.org/weir02172005.html February 17, 2005). Most of these seventeen billionaires are jewish. They are frequently referred to as russian oligarchs but, in reality, they are jewish oligarchs in russia.

It might have been thought that such outrageous political scandals in a country still bristling with nuclear weapons, would have been front page news in america and britain for many years. On the contrary, the scandals were rarely mentioned in the media and, if they were, the collective identity of the oligarchs avoided. Alison wear has argued that one of the main reasons for this was that associated press refused to investigate what these jews were doing in russia. This was important because "AP is the major news source for the thousands of news outlets around the country (america) who cannot afford to have their own foreign correspondents. When AP chooses not to cover something, its omission is felt throughout the nation. When national news networks and others leave out the same facts, the cover-up is almost total." (Alison Weir ‘Russia, Israel and Media Omissions’ http://www.counterpunch.org/weir02172005.html February 17, 2005).

Wear makes an even more specific allegation when she points out that, since the late 1990s, much of the responsibility for this cover up of the illegal, and murderous, activities of the jewish oligarchs has been due to judith ingram, associated press’s bureau chief in moscow. "For example, a few months ago in a typical AP story on this power struggle, "Report: Russia again charges Berezovsky," Judith Ingram makes no mention anywhere that Berezovsky is an Israeli citizen, or of his many connections to Israel. When … Ingram was asked about Berezovsky's Israeli citizenship, she claimed to know nothing about it, a curious contention for someone who has been an AP news editor in Moscow since 1999. When Ingram was queried further, she hung up the phone. An examination of Ingram's reporting on the Berezovsky story cited above raises serious questions. Though she is located in Moscow, Ingram interviewed only two people for her news story: Berezovsky, who is in London, and Berezovsky associate Alex Goldfarb, in New York. One wonders why she interviewed none of the Russians residing around her. Similarly, one wonders why not a single AP story has identified Berezovsky's considerable connection to Israel. Further, nowhere does Ingram's article convey the ruthlessness of the oligarchs' actions, or the significance of their holdings, including control of its media. Unnoted in Ingram's report is the fact that her subject and fellow oligarch Vladimir Gusinsky have been two of Russia's most powerful media tycoons." (Alison Weir ‘Russia, Israel and Media Omissions’ http://www.counterpunch.org/weir02172005.html February 17, 2005). In effect, judith ingram has turned russia’s jewish oligarchs into invisible jews. What judith miller did to manipulate america into a zionist proxy invasion of iraq, judith ingram has done to cover up jewish efforts to take control of russia. The reason that ingram choose to ignore the jewish oligarchs’ role in russia was because she knew that the jewish dominated american media didn’t want any publicity being given to what jewish thieves were doing in russia. She was just doing what her jewish masters wanted her to do.

Weir laments that, as a consequence of the american media’s silence about the jewish oligarchs’ activities in russia, most americans know little about what has been happening there. "Such omissions by AP and large swaths of the American media leave Americans seriously disadvantaged in deciphering what is going on in Russia, and its profound significance for the world." (Alison Weir ‘Russia, Israel and Media Omissions’ http://www.counterpunch.org/weir02172005.html February 17, 2005).

One of the main reasons the jews who own, manage, and work in, the media in america never exposed what their fellow countrymen were doing in russia is because of the obvious parallels between the jewish takeover of russia and the jewish takeover of america. In both russia prior to the rise of putin and in america, jews control the media, parliament/congress, and even to a substantial degree the presidency. If the jewish owned american media started discussing the jewish take-over of russia even the most retarded americans might start wondering if american jews had done anything similar in america. This might even lead them to question whether it is right for jews to control not only palestine but russia and america. It might lead them to wonder whether the view promoted by the jewish traitors in the bush administration that ‘what is good for the jos is good for america’ could possibly be true when jewish traitors in the yeltsin government were arguing that ‘what is good for the jos is good for russia’. Even worse is that american goyims might begin to feel as much contempt for their jewish masters as russian goyims have for theirs, "In Russia, the oligarchs are deeply loathed, considered villains who worked to bleed the country dry; during their reign many Russian citizens saw their life savings disappear overnight. (Alison Weir ‘Russia, Israel and Media Omissions’ http://www.counterpunch.org/weir02172005.html February 17, 2005). But it would be wrong for american goyims to believe that the jewish oligarchs in russia were anything like as mendacious and murderous as america’s jewish traitors. Sure, russia’s jewish traitors are a lot richer than many of their jewish counterparts in america but the latter are far more ruthless than the former when it comes to lying, cheating, stealing, and murdering.

The jewish owned american media has also kept quiet about a lot of other dirty secrets about the activities of their fellow countrymen in american politics. "For years, the neocons' push for war against Iraq was largely uncovered by the US media. For even longer, the neocons' close connections to Israel have gone largely unmentioned in mainstream American news reports. As a result, very few Americans know to what degree many of those responsible for the tragic US invasion and occupation of Iraq have been motivated by Israeli concerns. The omission in coverage of Iraq has been profoundly disastrous, both for the Middle East and for Americans. In fact, it is quite likely that only history will show the true extent of this disaster. It is deeply troubling to see the same kind of omission occurring on Russia." (Alison Weir ‘Russia, Israel and Media Omissions’ http://www.counterpunch.org/weir02172005.html February 17, 2005). The jewish owned media in america doesn’t want american goyims being worried about the loyalties of the jews who have manipulated a succession of american administrations from nixon onwards into adopting policies that are a benefit to the jos but not to america.

The hysterical paranoia that has been deliberately cultivated over anti-semitism enables jews to wield the allegation of anti-semitism as a club to intimidate anyone who might challenge jewish power. "Fear of being charged with anti-Semitism makes most people who know the truth about our complicity in Israeli policy and war-making cower in silence. As a consequence, few Americans know that our governmental bureaucracy is thoroughly penetrated by Zionists." (Paul Findley ‘United States Must Address Control of its Middle East Policies by Israeli Lobby’ http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0326-22.htm March 26, 2006); "Suffice to say that this about sums up the entire strategy of the Lobby in all the years of its operation: anyone who opposes them is a "bigot," an "anti-Semite," and is spreading the modern day equivalent of the infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion." (Justin Raimondo ‘Smear and Fear’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8832 April 10, 2006).

Michael neumann concludes, "In short, the real scandal today is not antisemitism but the importance it is given. Israel has committed war crimes. It has implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and Jews generally have hastened to implicate themselves. This has provoked hatred against Jews. Why not? Some of this hatred is racist, some isn't, but who cares? Why should we pay any attention to this issue at all? Is the fact that Israel's race war has provoked bitter anger of any importance besides the war itself? Is the remote possibility that somewhere, sometime, somehow, this hatred may in theory, possibly kill some Jews of any importance besides the brutal, actual, physical persecution of Palestinians, and the hundreds of thousands of votes for Arabs to be herded into transit camps? Oh, but I forgot. Drop everything. Someone spray-painted antisemitic slogans on a synagogue." (Michael Neumann ‘What is Antisemitism?’ http://www.ukar.org/neuman/neuman01.html June 4, 2002).

Since america’s first proxy zionist war in 1991, jewish racial hatred of arabs/moslems has been imported into america primarily by america’s ruling jewish elite but also by ordinary jews in america, "One of the saddest consequences of Israel's colonialism has been the moral coarsening of elements of the Jewish-American community. I grew up admiring Jewish civil rights activists for their sometimes heroic role in the fight to dismantle segregation in the US. But today I frequently hear Jewish acquaintances discuss Arabs in general, and Palestinians in particular, in terms as racist as those once used by southerners in public when discussing blacks. "Israel should have given the Palestinians to Jordan after 1967," a Jewish editor recently said to me, in the same tone used by an elderly white southerner who once told me, "We should have left them all in Africa." The parallel can be extended. After 1830, the defence of slavery and later segregation in the old south led white southerners to abandon the liberal idealism of the founding era in favour of harsh racism and a siege mentality. Since 1967, the need to justify the rule of Israel over a conquered helot population has produced a similar shift from humane idealism to unapologetic tribalism in parts of the diaspora, as well as in Israel. It is perhaps no coincidence that the most important non-Jewish supporters of Israel in the US today are found in the deep south among descendants of the segregationist Dixiecrats." (Michael Lind ‘The Israel Lobby’ April 1, 2002).

In america, the jewish owned media, jewish academia/think tanks, jewish/jewish-owned politicians, and the jol, are all involved in promoting and publicizing jewish racial hatred towards arabs and islamic peoples. Jewish hatemongers have transformed american cultural values so that a significant proportion of americans now regard themselves as arabophobic. "Here in Los Angeles, the principal talk radio stations are constantly broadcasting extreme hate and insults against Arabs, Muslims and Islamic religious faiths. There are three Jewish radio talk hosts that are particularly venomous. They are Dennis Prager, Bill Handel and Michael Medved. Dennis Prager and Michael Medved are with KRLA and Bill Handel is with KFI. The programming against Islam on KFI is extremely obscene and the radio station has received many complaints from Islamic, Muslim and Arab civil rights organizations and individuals. There are now numerous documented instances in which the Prophet Muhammad and the Holy Koran have been shown ugly disrespect by Jewish talk radio hosts. Bill Handel proposed that the new Iraqi constitution should include the phrase "all civil unions between consenting Iraqi adults and loving camels and goats will be recognized." Another comment said on the radio concerns the "toilet flushing of the Koran" incident at Guantanamo. The comment, "They should have wiped their asses with the pages of the Koran" was broadcast throughout Southern California. KFI also poked dastardly fun at the deaths of Muslims that occurred during the most recent Hajj in Mecca." (Ernesto Cienfuegos ‘Jews against Islam: The War of Cartoons’ http://www.aztlan.net/hitler_frank.htm February 9th 2006).

A few years ago, jewish intellectual racists coined the term ‘islamofascism’ in order to demonize moslems around the world. The objective is to suggest that moslems are the new nazis thereby implying that america needs to launch pre-emptive wars against the arab world to prevent another global war. Of course, the implication that all moslems are nazis also implies there is no possibility of negotiating or reasoning with them. The jos has reiterated for decades that it cannot negotiate with palestinians. All that it is doing now is extending the numbers of those with whom it refuses to negotiate. It has persuade most of the western world to not to negotiate with the democratically elected hamas government.

A number of examples of the jewish nazification of islamic peoples can be given. "On February 10, 2004, the columnist Charles Krauthammer gave the annual Irving Kristol address at the American Enterprise Institute, in Washington. The new "existential enemy," Krauthammer said, is "Arab-Islamic totalitarianism," and he compared the war that the United States should fight against this entity to the war against Fascist Germany and Japan - a war committed to the eradication of a deadly and evil culture." (Louis Menand ‘Breaking Away: Francis Fukuyama and the neoconservatives’ http://www.newyorker.com/critics/books/articles
/060327crbo_books March 20th 2006); "Since last year, when we gathered together in this city, events have gone from bad to worse," said Howard Kohr, Aipac's executive director, addressing a record number of delegates during his opening night address. Kohr's sobering speech was an exercise in Holocaust analogy. It was preceded by a short video bluntly comparing Iran to Nazi Germany and the Islamic Republic's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to Adolph Hitler. "The parallels of the geopolitical climate of March 5, 1933, and that of March 5, 2006, are stunning in their likeness, eerie in their implication," Kohr said, adding, "Unlike the ominous days of the 1930s, this time we must not ignore the approaching thunder." (Ori Nir ‘Reporter’s Notebook’ http://www.forward.com/main/printer-friendly.php?id=7487 March 10, 2006); "Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has challenged the reality of the Holocaust and said that Israel must be "wiped off the map." Bush and others in the White House view him as a potential Adolf Hitler, a former senior intelligence official said. "That’s the name they’re using. They say, ‘Will Iran get a strategic weapon and threaten another world war?’" (Seymour M. Hersh ‘The Iran Plans’ http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/
060417fa_fact April 10th 2006); "Comparing Iran's alleged push to gain a nuclear weapon to Adolf Hitler's 1936 march on the Rhineland, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol called for undertaking "serious preparation for possible military action ­ including real and urgent operational planning for bombing strikes and for the consequences of such strikes."" (Jim Lobe ‘Neocons Turn Up Heat for Iran Attack’ http://www.antiwar.com/lobe/?articleid=8852 April 14, 2006); "The most dangerous leaders in modern history are those (like Hitler) equipped with a totalitarian ideology and a mystical belief in their own mission. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad fulfills both these criteria, as revealed by his U.N. comments. That combined with his expected nuclear arsenal make him an adversary who must be stopped, and urgently." (Daniel Pipes ‘Iran's Messianic Menace’ http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20835 January 10, 2006).

Daniel pipes is hysterical, paranoid, jewish hatemonger who believes osama bin laden was hitler, yasser arafat was hitler, and now mahmoud ahmadinejad is hitler. It would be safer to say that pipes sees hitler everywhere under every non-jewish bed. Pipes’s views might be deemed to be so ridiculous that nobody could take them seriously. Unfortunately, such views were also taken seriously by terrorists and war criminals such as ariel sharon. They are common throughout the likud party in the jos and amongst america’s ruling jewish elite.

Mike scheuer explains, "For years ­ even decades ­ U.S. citizens have been the subject of a political action campaign designed and executed by Israel. Currently, Israel's campaign is part steady-as-she-goes and part improvisation to neutralize an unexpected and ­ for Israel ­ worrying development. So far, Israel's covert political action is succeeding hands down. Americans are gradually being indoctrinated to believe Islamists are today's Nazis and that there is no "Israeli lobby" in America. Simply put, Israel is conducting a brilliant covert political action campaign in the United States, a campaign any intelligence service in the world would rightly be proud of. Part one of Israeli's political action consists simply of using that old standby debate-suppressor, the four-letter word "Nazi." Newspapers in Israel, of course, have long used the word to describe Israel's Muslim enemies. Recently, for example, the Jerusalem Post ran an article in which al-Qaeda is described as "yet another Nazi knockoff." This sort of language is the stuff of Israeli journalism, and not of much concern to Americans. If the Israeli press wants to teach their readers to underestimate the Islamist threat, so be it. But now the word "Nazi" is being gradually fed to Americans as a scientific definition of our Islamist enemies. Headlines such as "Hamas Uber Alles," "Hitler's Heirs in Damascus," and "The Nazi Correction to Islamic Terror" are increasingly common in U.S. media publications found in the news files Googled daily by Americans. U.S. politicians, too, are eager to jump on the call-them-Nazis bandwagon, with Secretary Rumsfeld recently saying that leaving Iraq early would be like returning postwar Germany to the Nazis, and Sen. George Allen (R-Va.) comparing the attack on the Shia shrine in Samarra to the burning of the Reichstag by the Nazis." (Mike Scheuer ‘Does Israel Conduct Covert Action in America?’ http://www.antiwar.com/scheuer/?articleid=8827 April 8, 2006).

Michael neumann’s thesis is that the jews in america have succeeded in manipulating americans into fighting a race war against the arab/islamic world, "America is not using Israel to fight against communism or for economic advantage. Israel is using America to fight a race war, and America is too much of a dummy to understand. It fawns on Israel, mostly because it is befuddled, and partly because its politicians fear offending Jewish voters. But America is not the enemy here; it is aiding the enemy. The left is so fixated on American sinfulness that it treats present US support for Israel like past US sponsorship of true proxy regimes like Pinochet's Chile, and all but lets the real culprit off the hook. American weapons inflict huge harm on the Palestinians, but it is not America that is inflicting the harm: 'it's the Israelis, stupid!' Even without American arms, plucky little Israel would still manage to oppress the Palestinians and intimidate their reluctant allies." (Michael Neumann ‘Protect Me from My Friends’ http://www.counterpunch.org/neumann0820.html August 20, 2002).

The issue is simple but horrifying. The jews in america are poisoning the well of america’s multi-cultural, democratic, society in order to manipulate "dumb" americans into a third world war in which they will sacrifice their lives, and their resources, solely for the sake of promoting jewish global supremacism. "Israel is building a racial state, not a religious one." (Michael Neumann ‘What is Antisemitism?’ http://www.ukar.org/neuman/neuman01.html June 4, 2002).

The jol’s role is to continually pressure the jewish dominated media to prevent any debates about jewish power anywhere around the world. "In addition to influencing government policy directly, the Lobby strives to shape public perceptions about Israel and the Middle East. It does not want an open debate on issues involving Israel, because an open debate might cause Americans to question the level of support that they currently provide. Accordingly, pro-Israel organizations work hard to influence the media, think tanks, and academia, because these institutions are critical in shaping popular opinion." (John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ rwp_06_011_walt.pdf March 2006 p.20); "The goal is to prevent critical commentary about Israel from getting a fair hearing in the political arena. Controlling the debate is essential to guaranteeing U.S. support, because a candid discussion of U.S.-Israeli relations might lead Americans to favor a different policy." (John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ rwp_06_011_walt.pdf March 2006 p.16-17).

The jol employs a range of tactics to protest about any negative opinions or bad publicity for the jos. Perhaps it will get a jewish advertiser to contact the owner of a television/newspaper company threatening to withdraw advertising revenue if an offending journalist is not removed or if it publishes criticisms of the jos. It might organize demonstrations outside the offices of a media company or organize email/letter writing campaigns, "To discourage unfavorable reporting on Israel, the Lobby organizes letter writing campaigns, demonstrations, and boycotts against news outlets whose content it considers anti-Israel. One CNN executive has said that he sometimes gets 6,000 e-mail messages in a single day complaining that a story is anti-Israel. Similarly, the pro-Israel Committee for Accurate Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) organized demonstrations outside National Public Radio stations in 33 cities in May 2003, and it also tried to convince contributors to withhold support from NPR until its Middle East coverage became more sympathetic to Israel. Boston’s NPR station, WBUR, reportedly lost more than $1 million in contributions as a result of these efforts. Pressure on NPR has also come from Israel’s friends in Congress, who have asked NPR for an internal audit as well as more oversight of its Middle East coverage." (John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ rwp_06_011_walt.pdf March 2006 p.20). Over the years this political pressure on the american media has led to the situation where it is easier for those in the media ­ even none jews - to support whatever the jos does, no matter how awful or illegal, rather than face a barrage of abuse from paranoid jewish racists in the jol.

A couple of examples of the jol’s success in abolishing free speech could be provided, "Twelve years ago, one of the Israeli lobby groups that Mearsheimer and Walt fingers prevented any second showing of a film series on Muslims in which I participated for Channel 4 and the Discovery Channel - by stating that my "claim" that Israel was building large Jewish settlements on Arab land was "an egregious falsehood". I was, according to another Israeli support group, "a Henry Higgins with fangs", who was "drooling venom into the living rooms of America."" (Robert Fisk ‘The United States of Israel?’ http://www.counterpunch.org/fisk04272006.html April 27, 2006). Then came the infamous ban on a play by rachel corrie. "Across the United States, there is growing evidence that the Israeli and neo-conservative lobbies are acquiring ever greater power. The cancellation by a New York theatre company of My Name is Rachel Corrie - a play based on the writings of the young American girl crushed to death by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza in 2003 - has deeply shocked liberal Jewish Americans, not least because it was Jewish American complaints that got the performance pulled. "How can the West condemn the Islamic world for not accepting Mohamed cartoons," Philip Weiss asked in The Nation, "when a Western writer who speaks out on behalf of Palestinians is silenced? And why is it that Europe and Israel itself have a healthier debate over Palestinian human rights than we can have here?"" (Robert Fisk ‘The United States of Israel?’ http://www.counterpunch.org/fisk04272006.html April 27, 2006).

There is little doubt that jews’ hysterical denunciations of any criticisms of the jos which appear in the media are designed to stifle free speech and open debate. "Moreover, the Lobby’s campaign to squelch debate about Israel is unhealthy for democracy. Silencing skeptics by organizing blacklists and boycotts - or by suggesting that critics are anti-Semites - violates the principle of open debate upon which democracy depends. The inability of the U.S. Congress to conduct a genuine debate on these vital issues paralyzes the entire process of democratic deliberation. Israel’s backers should be free to make their case and to challenge those who disagree with them. But efforts to stifle debate by intimidation must be roundly condemned by those who believe in free speech and open discussion of important public issues." (John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ rwp_06_011_walt.pdf March 2006 p.42); "The 9/11 horror, as well as the wars our government has initiated are the ugly offspring of our longstanding bias in Middle East policy. These calamities can be traced step by step to lobbies preventing free speech. If free speech and open debate had prevailed on Capitol Hill or even within non-partisan activities of American society, civilized discussion would have forced reform." (Paul Findley ‘United States Must Address Control of its Middle East Policies by Israeli Lobby’ http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0326-22.htm March 26, 2006).