Successive british governments, including blair’s, have tended to oppose the idea of separate states for different ethnic groups in conflict with each other within the boundaries of one country because this implies they can never live together. The idea of “power-sharing” has dominated british government thinking in south africa, northern ireland, bosnia, kosovo, and macedonia. It is suspected that the reason for blair’s equivocation about a palestinian state was his hope for the creation of a unified state over the whole of palestine in which jews and palestinians would share power equally and live in a multicultural society like those in the west. It was only on october 15th 2002 during his meeting with yasser arafat that, for the first time, blair expressed his support for a palestinian state, "A viable Palestinian state, as part of a negotiated and agreed settlement, which guarantees peace and security for Israel is the objective."[1]

John kampfner provides an account of the way that blair and other new labour leaders made pro-semitic bigotry a critical component of new labour’s agenda after he was elected leader of the labour party. It is well known that new labour’s leaders were far more business oriented, almost thatcherite, than other labour members so he had to slowly infiltrate ideas about the free market, enterprise, the private sector, etc into the party over a number of years. What was not apparent until kampfner’s article was blair’s decision to promote a robust pro-semitic stance and thereby distance new labour as far as possible from old labour’s pro-palestinian sympathies. New labour’s business orientation required them to recognize the considerable role played in the british economy by jewish businesspeople who were likely to be alienated by the labour party’s/government’s pro-palestinian sympathies and policies. Doubtlessly the fact that one jewish financial speculator, george soros, is commonly credited with forcing britain out of the european exchange rate mechanism, would have brought home to blair and other new labour leaders that pro-palestine sympathies, no matter how just they might be, would deter jewish businesspeople from making a full scale contribution to the country’s economic growth. To believe that the palestinians buried under the rubble of jenin were sacrificed on blair’s alter of new labour is revolting.

Mcblair’s reaction to the p*ny bombings was intensely purposeful. He seemed desperate to try and curb america’s desire for instant military retaliation. He carefully shadowed mcbush’s political line over the bombings whilst emphasizing the need for caution, “This was an attack on the free and democratic world and this is the responsibility of the free and democratic world have got to shoulder with america. It is important americans know their allies stand shoulder to shoulder with them.”[3]

After the p*ny bombings, the labour government ordered its parliamentary whips to keep labour members of parliament in line and not to rock the boat over the bombing of afghanistan. Given the government’s predilection for control freakery it was not surprising that when a handful of labour politicians raised objections to america’s bombing of a defenceless, poverty stricken, country they were severely chastised by the government’s parliamentary enforcers. What was so shocking about this, however, was that these enforcers tried to instil into the dissidents some of the basic tenets of extreme zionist fundamentalism which sharon had outlined soon after the p*ny bombings. On 22nd october 2001 the mirror stated, “Hilary armstrong, labour’s chief whip, criticized paul marsden over his views on the war, “War is not a matter of conscience. It was people like you who appeased hitler in 1938.”[5] Here was a freely elected, democratic government enforcing extremist zionist propaganda on its own mps!

After the p*ny bombings, jack straw seemed to undergo a zionist baptism. He started off by trying to promote peace and reconciliation in the middle east by going on a tour of the middle east which included a visit to iran and the zionist state in palestine. The decision to visit iran was brave since, at the time, ziono-american propagandists were castigating the iranian government as a terrorist state. Whilst on this tour straw mentioned the word ‘palestine’ in a letter which was published in brutland, “Mr straw, who started a four day tour of the middle east yesterday, prompted controversy by writing a letter in which he twice referred to palestine. The israelis do not recognize the term for that part of the middle east.”[9] Whilst he was in tehran he even gave a balanced view of the middle east conflict, “One of the factors that helps breed terrorism is the anger which many people in this region feel at events over the years in palestine.”[10] But poor old straw, a long time member of the anti-racist and anti-nazis left, couldn’t bring himself to denounce crypto-nazi zionism. What a tangled web of deceit the left and their zionist masters have weaved - and let’s hope it strangles the lot of them.

See also 'You will not mention Palestine'.

During the early days of the zionists’ april 2002 reoccupation of palestine, mcblair kept carefully in line with mcbush’s views. He did not condemn the invasion - as if it was quite normal for the zionist army to invade other countries. However, when mcbush initially claimed the invasion was the second phase of the wart, mcblair neither supported nor criticized this view. A few days later when mcbush changed his mind, mcblair followed the new line and demanded the zionist army’s withdrawal from the occupied areas. Sharon dismissed his muppets.

At the same time as mcblair was insisting on pro-semitic bigotry amongst labour’s political careerists, he was also promoting the view that labour was anti-racist. Strange isn’t it that being anti-racist is so easily compatible with pro-semitic bigotry? It’s also noteworthy that mcblair and the left believe that anti-semitism is racist but pro-semitism is not. In his speech to the labour party conference in october 2000, mcblair rounded on his critics who accused him of being a moral vacuum and stated he believed in core values - one of which was anti-racism - excluding, of course, crypto-nazi zionist racism.

Jews have used their influence in brutish society and in parliament to obtain legislation promoting their interests.

When kenneth clarke was secretary of state for education he served notice of his intention to ban, from the national curriculum, the teaching of contemporary middle east history. He believed that children should be taught about events only up to 1967. This is one of the reasons’ why the public is so ignorant about contemporary middle east events.

One of the prime examples of zionists’ influence on brutland’s domestic politics is the parliamentary bill to prosecute old nazis. Jewish pressure groups and jewish mps combined to persuade parliament to pass a law to prosecute nazi war offenders who’d been living incognito in this country. There have been a couple of court cases involving a huge amount of police/solicitors/judges/juries’ time and resources, “A pensioner accused of mass murder 57 years ago will today go in the dock in britain’s first war crimes trial. Ex-rail worker anthony sawoniuk, 77, denies killing four jews .. .”[18] It’s strange that every effort is being made to prosecute a doddering old nazi who carried out minor crimes sixty years ago whilst the zionist war criminal, ariel bin sharon, is being hailed as a hero in the fight against terrorism. Not surprisingly sawoniuk ended up in prison, “The grisly past of 78 year old anthony saoniuk finally caught up with him yesterday when he was jailed for life for the war time murder of jews.”[19] Whilst this old man spends the rest of his life in prison for war crimes, ariel bin sharon will be bulldozing his way through janin to damascus, baghdad, and tehran.

In brutland, catholics and jews are allowed to set up religious faith schools to pass on and thus preserve their particular culture. Religious schools are entitled to government grants to run and manage their own schools and implement their own education policies. However, the zionists in the brutish government/parliament are refusing to give moslems the same right that they enjoy. Tony mcblair confessed he could see no reason why moslems shouldn’t be entitled to the same privileges as catholics and jews - obviously implying he had nothing to do with the failure to implement such a proposal.[20] There is nothing wrong with jews establishing their own schools but there is something wrong when they try to stop muslims enjoying the same privileges.

Jews have even managed to win a day of remembrance for the so-called jewish holocaust, “A day of remembrance is to be held to honour the six million victims of the nazi holocaust. Survivors of hitler’s massacre of the jews will pay their respects at a special ceremony to be held in london on january 27th.”[21] This is one of the sickest ceremonies in a ceremony laden society.

In 1999, the labour government announced it had come to an arrangement about repaying jewish assets which had been seized during the second world war.

In the 1980s the tories ended the ban on sunday trading. What was interesting about this, however, was that prior to the change in the law, tim sainsbury, a member of the house of lords and the tory government, allowed his company to engage in sunday trading. In other words, he allowed his company to commit an illegal act - this is the same tim sainsbury who has happily joined the new labour government. Sainsbury’s was never prosecuted for breaking the law. Is it any wonder that dope is illegal when drug pushers like sainsbury are legally entitled to sell tobacco and alcohol which have caused minor holocausts in the over-industrialized world? So, if anyone finds themselves listening to sainsbury pontificating about the need to abide by the rule of law when it comes to smoking dope they might remind him what his own company did during the sunday trading debate.

As the law stands, (july 2004) it is an offence for people to make abusive comments about the jewish and sikh religions but not the christian or moslem religions. With an increase in the number of attacks on moslems the labour government has decided to change the law so that all religions are protected.

"Documents uncovered by Newsnight in the British National Archives show how, in 1958, Britain agreed to sell Israel 20 tonnes of heavy water, a vital ingredient for the production of plutonium at Israel's top secret Dimona nuclear reactor in the Negev desert. Robert McNamara, President John F Kennedy's defence secretary, has told Newsnight he is "astonished" at the revelation that Britain kept this secret from America." (Michael Crick ‘How Britain helped Israel get the bomb’ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/4743493.stm 3 August 3rd 2005).

"Israel asked Britain in 1966 to supply 10mg of plutonium. Israel would have required almost 5kg of plutonium to build an atomic bomb, but British defence intelligence officials warned that 10mg had "significant military value" and could enable the Jewish state to carry out important experimental work to speed up its nuclear weapons programme. Documents show that the decision to sell plutonium to Israel in 1966 was blocked by officials in both the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign Office, who said: "It is HMG's policy not to do anything which would assist Israel in the production of nuclear weapons." But the deal was forced through by a Jewish civil servant, Michael Michaels, in Tony Benn's Ministry of Technology, which was responsible for trade in nuclear material, according to Newsnight. Peter Kelly, who was British defence intelligence's expert on the Israeli nuclear weapons programme, knew Mr Michaels. He told Newsnight he believed Mr Michaels knew that Israel was trying to build an atomic bomb, but that he had dual loyalties to Britain and Israel. Mr Benn told the programme that civil servants in his department kept the deals secret from him and his predecessor, Frank Cousins. He had always suspected that civil servants were doing deals behind his back, but he never thought they would sell plutonium to Israel. He told Newsnight: "I'm not only surprised, I'm shocked. It never occurred to me they would authorise something so totally against the policy of the government. Michaels lied to me, I learned by bitter experience that the nuclear industry lied to me again and again." He thought Wilson may not have known that Britain was helping Israel to get the bomb." (Richard Norton-Taylor ‘Britain gave Israel plutonium, files show’ http://politics.guardian.co.uk/politicspast/story/0,,1727978,00.html March 10, 2006).

In the 1970s and 1980s, jewish financial predators ripped through brutish industry and transformed it out of all recognition. Keith joseph, another jew, was a leading advocate of free market competition, who thereby provided a justification for the activities of these financial predators. He is commonly recognized as having had a major influence on thatcher’s ideas.

Lawson is a former chancellor of the exchequer - it has to be asked how many arabs or moslems have obtained such positions?

Kaufman is a former labour shadow foreign secretary. Despite the fact that, over the last decade or so, many high profile, ziono-american politicians have shifted, quite dramatically, to the right, and despite the fact that when new labour came to dominate the labour movement and switched, overnight, from a pro-palestinian to a pro-crypto-nazi zionist, stance kaufmann has remained loyal to his earlier liberal, multi-cultural views. He showed quite a considerable degree of bravery for persisting in stating the obvious, “His comments came hours after the prominent Jewish MP Gerald Kaufman described the Israeli government as "repulsive" and its prime minister, Ariel Sharon, as a "blustering bully" and a "war criminal".” [22]

IDS wrote an article for the Independent outlining his slavish support for the zionist state in palestine. If anyone wants to appreciate the pro-semitic bigotry of contemporary politicians they would learn a great deal from this article.

Straw is Home Secretary. It has been alleged that, "He has some Jewish ancestry, but he is not Jewish." In March 2006 straw consolidated his zionist grip over the foreign office, previously viewed as arabist, with the appointment of ariel sharon's former advisor, Daniel Bethlehem.

"The British Foreign Office has appointed a controversial Israeli government adviser to one of its most sensitive posts as head of the legal department. Advice from Daniel Bethlehem QC in 2002 to the then Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, led Israel to block a UN inquiry into the battle of Jenin. The Israeli refusal to cooperate was widely condemned at the time by various human rights organisations. Mr Bethlehem, who was Israel's external legal adviser, also took the lead for the Israeli government at the International court of justice in The Hague in 2004 to defend the barrier being built along the West Bank. Israel lost the case." (Ewen MacAskill ‘Israel adviser switches to top FO job’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1725156,00.html March 7, 2006).

Bassam is secretary for immigration.

Roche was Under-Secretary for Immigration. She left the Home Office in 2001.

Mcblair appointed goldsmith as the new Attorney General in february 2004.

After mcblair became prime minister, he began conducting his own foreign policies in the middle east quite independently of jack straw, supposedly the secretary of state for the foreign and commonwealth office and the bureaucrats inthis department. He does this by using his jewish friends as political advisors, “Lord levy has a room at the foreign and commonwealth office (fco). It is down the corridor from the head of the middle east and north africa command. The location is no coincidence. He has been put there as a counterweight to what some in downing street regard as the ‘arabist tendency’ in the fco. The role of this new labour fundraiser in chief, well paid consultant to retail chains and the prime minister’s tennis partner, who spends several months a year at his house in tel aviv, is crucial in understanding tony blair’s beneficent approach to israel.” [23]

"Levy was the man who made Tony Blair the Prime Minister of England. He found youthful Tony, managed his election campaign and brought him to power. (Levy learned a lot from Bronfman, who was instrumental in bringing Clinton to the White House). Blair made Levy is special envoy to the Middle East, but the Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, blocked Levy's attempts to re-Zionize British policy. He even refused to give the freshly knighted Michael Levy a room with a secretary in the Foreign Office. It was short-sighted of Cook, who had annoyed Israelis on previous occasions as well. After Blair's re-election, Cook got the boot, and Levy was elevated." (foppe37 http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=17734 c.2004).

According to sparks, levi has raised £30 million for the Labour party and thus "effectively owns the Party." (Thomas Sparks 'Jewish Control of the British Media' http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/shadow/jewishmedia_uk.shtml May 2002). Whether this is true or not is not known. It is added so that readers of this website might be able to judge sparks's veracity. It is commonly suspected that levy donates substantial amounts of money to the labour party but it is not known how much.

"Lord Levy is one of the most important fundraisers for the Labour Party and Tony Blair's unofficial envoy to the Middle East. He met Blair at a dinner party in 1994 held by Gideon Meir, a senior Israeli diplomat, and became his tennis partner. Levy was in charge of donations to the 'private trust' which funded Tony Blair's office before the 1997 election (which reached £7 million), and is now the chief fundraiser for the 'high value' donors account at the Labour Party, along with his deputy Amanda Delew (who worked with him at Jewish Care). He is reported to have raised £12 million for the 'high value' fund before the 1997 election, becoming known as 'Mr Cashpoint'. Straight after the election he was given a peerage. He used to work with Dr Henry Drucker, whose company Oxford Philanthropic was brought in by the Labour Party to advise on gaining large corporate donations, but they fell out over Drucker's description of Labour's 'blind trust' funds as 'evil' (the trusts have since all been closed down). At one meeting with Levy in his Totteridge mansion, Levy apologised to Drucker for not offering him a cup of coffee, but explained 'You'll have to do without as none of the servants are about and I don't know how to work the machine myself.'

The following quote also mentions another of mcblair’s personal contacts, “The orthodox casuistry among factotums, columnists and courtiers of the Washington regime is symbolised by Prime Minister Tony Blair's personal assistant for foreign affairs, ex-diplomat Robert Cooper, who writes openly: "We need to get used to the idea of double standards."” [26]

A third contact was lord powell of bayswater, baroness thatcher's former foreign affairs adviser.[27]

The tory party is even more dominated by zionist/jews than the labour government. Michael howard is leader of the tory party; oliver letwin is shadow chancellor (and a former director of nm rothschild, the london branch of the rothschilds banking dynasty); and lord saatchi is the tory party chairman. (So the palestinians should stand a good chance of getting justice if the tories ever get back into power)!

In terms of the number of zionist/jewish people living in brutland, there is a disproportionately high number of zionist/jews in parliament. It has been seen that the same is true in america. In america, zionist/jews have come to dominate congress and, in turn, congress has been able to challenge the president. The political situation is different in brutland. Firstly, the main dominating force in parliament is the landowning elite and, secondly, parliament has much less power to challenge the executive than congress has to challenge the president. In brutland, there is a strong jewish influence on domestic issues, for there are many domestic ethnic/religious issues but, as in america, the main influence is on foreign affairs. In brutland, it is as if there is an agreement between the landowning elite and zionist/jews in parliament that the former will predominate where domestic issues are concerned whereas the latter will predominate where international issues are concerned. It is not a contradiction to argue that the landowning elite and zionist influences both dominate parliament because it seems as if there is something like a power-sharing agreement between them over who controls what.

Lord Bassam is secretary for immigration.

It has been alleged that black "is not a Jew except in the fantasies of neo-nazis." For further details please see section 5.2.2.1.1: Zionist Ownership of the Brutish Media.In 2004 black was exposed as a crook and was ousted from his position as head on hollinger - the group which owns the telegraph.

Goldsmith is mcblair's latest Attorney General. It is not known whether he is Jewish or identiofies himself as jewish.

“The product of an eastern european jewish upbringing, (arnold) goodman had risen to the head of one of the country’s most respected law firms, goodman derrick. He became a close confidant to three prime ministers of different political hues .. a man with a peerless range of contacts who wielded enormous informal power.”[31] Another opinion suggested in 2004 that goodman "has not wielded power for thirty years."

“James hanson and gordon white of hanson (both later made peers).”[30]

Lord Irvine was mcblair's first Attorney General. It has been stated that derry irvine "appears as Jewish only on a couple of anti-semitic websites."

See above.

Lovelock has stated, “Victor, the lord rothschild, was then the senior member of the english branch of that famous jewish family and, unusually for aristocrats, both he and his sister miriam were distinguished biologists and fellows of the royal society.” [28] He also stated that rothschild used to boast, “You know, i have never paid tax. It is quite simple. You see, i have no income.” [29]

“The conservative peer lord saatchi .. the labour party’s lord sainsbury of turville .. Charles saatchi and david sainsbury are two of the most successful entrepreneurs of the modern era.”[33]

It has been argued that david sainsbury has "Jewish ancestors but was brought up Church of England and is now an atheist."

“Weidenfeld, at one time chef de cabinet to israel’s founding president chaim weizmann, was and remains a serious operator at the level of government, editors and media proprietors.” [34]

“France’s ambassador to london was facing growing pressure to resign last night amid claims he branded israel a “shitty little country.” Mr sharon said the reported outburst, made at a dinner party, put a huge strain on relations between the two countries. And he added that if bernard was not punished, he would assume france’s entire administration held the same view as its ambassador. “Sixty years after jews have been at ground zero - with the help of french officials - french officials should have some understanding of the words they utter in such a volatile situation as in the middle east.” Yesterday labour’s friends of israel group condemned bernard. MP jim murphy .. the group’s president gwyneth dunwoody .. .” (Mirror 21.12.2001 p.17).

There is a disproportionately high number of jews in the three main political parties, as there is in america. However, they do not fund the labour party to the same extent as they fund the democratic party in america.

Just as is the case in america, the labour party has always been more of a rainbow coalition than the tory party. However, despite the many jews in the labour party, the party has always had a strong pro-palestinian element.

The influence of the jewish lobby in the labour party is considerable, "The Scottish Labour was told by the Labour party's National Executive Council that it could not invite a PLO speaker unless Israeli parties affiliated to the Socialist International were also invited, as well as an observer from the Israeli embassy."[36] If the labour party had insisted on plo speakers every time it was addressed by jewish speakers then palestinians would have been delighted.

David triesman is a jew and general secretary of the labour party. He complained to new statesman about a number of points made in an article by john pilger. Triesman was particularly annoyed that pilger suspected lord levy’s interest in peace in the middle east, “Saeb erakat, the palestinian chief negotiator, said recently: “Lord levy is a friend of mine and his heart is very much in the peace process .. He is in favour of the establishment of a state of Palestine, on a negotiated basis, giving full security to the state of Israel.” I never thought I would come to regard it (New Statesman) as anti-semitic. But i do today.” [37]

There is nothing in brutland which resembles the highly organized and highly centralized nature of the american zionist lobby. In america, the zionist lobby is a formal organization, with head offices, a formal constitutional structure, and formal political powers. There seems nothing like this in brutland. There are a plethora of zionist organizations at work in brutland but they are not co-ordinated. Ian duncan smith points out an intersting fact, "A country, which was founded upon the work of volunteers and philanthropic activity - and has today over 28,000 voluntary and charitable organisations - has much to teach us about public service, responsibility, compassion and duty towards others. It seems to me that these values are steeped in the Jewish tradition. All across the world Jewish organisations and others work hard to support Israel, whether it is through philanthropy or by actively sending volunteers to help in Kibbutzim, hospitals or schools." (Ian Duncan Smith The Independent, London 03 December 2001, page 15).

Poju zabludowcz’s .. “main interest lies in his london based business, ivory gate. .. the boss of ivory gate is also the mr moneybags behind .. bicom (the britain israel communications and research centre) the semi-public face of britain’s zionist lobby, charged with spinning israel’s case to the media. That there is a zionist lobby and that it is rich, potent and effective goes largely unquestioned on the left. Big jewry, like big tobacco, is seen as one of life’s givens. Read the liberal press almost any day of the week, and you will find that israel comes off worst. The truth is that the zionist lobby does exist but it is a clueless bunch.” [38]

“The task of making formal complaints about supposed media misrepresentation increasingly falls to the board of deputies of british jews, a solemn, rather bureaucratic organization.”[40]

"Other organisations like the Conservative Friends of Israel do so much to ensure that Israel's voice is heard in Westminster and Whitehall. This matters because Britain's diplomatic tradition ensures that that message is carried beyond Britain shores. I am proud that the majority of my Parliamentary party are members of CFI. The level of support which CFI has, shows all too clearly the depths of warmth and feeling that Conservatives have to Israel and all she stands for. CFI has an enviable record of achieving worthy objectives and I congratulate Director Stuart Polak for over ten years of exceptional work. I am delighted that Gillian Shepherd who does so much for CFI is now our Party Vice Chairman and is now responsible for selecting our next generation of Parliamentary Candidates." (Ian Duncan Smith The Independent, London 03 December 2001, page 15).

.. “the web based HonestReporting.com set up by two students at the university of london who felt that israel was getting a bum deal in the press.”[42]

.. critics of israeli policy are guaranteed to receive thousands of vituperative letters and emails. These correspondents take their cue from organizations such as the zionist federation’s media response unit, run by the former labour mp for basildon eric moonman or from the web based HonestReporting.com set up by two students at the university of london who felt that israel was getting a bum deal in the press.”[39]

According to dennis sewell, “A steelier edge to perception management is provided by the israeli embassy in the form of its press attaché david ‘dj’ schneeweiss. His opponents accuse him of peddling the ‘big lies’ of israeli propaganda, such as the line that the palestinians deliberately put their children up front to draw israeli sniper fire, hoping a few infant deaths will help the cause. But most journalists who have been fed the line source it from jerusalem.” [41]

This primarily covers the judiciary, police, and secrewt services.

Lander was chief of brutland's secret police.

Wolff was a law lord.

There are a number of famous zionists in british politics who have ripped off the british people (both black and white) for the sake of their beloved zionist homeland.

It’s been a strange feature of political scandals during the late 1990s and early 21stc that many have affected either mps who support moslems or moslem mps. Firstly, there was the scandal surrounding jonathon aitken who was receiving fees for consultancy services to saudi arabian rulers. Then the labour government got tied up with the hinduja brothers. It’s almost as if jews never donate money to the labour party and are never involved in any dirty dealings. There is a staggering imbalance of power between zionists and moslems in brutish politics. There are those who argue this is just a matter of meritocracy and yet it is strange how many politicians with moslem/arabist connections end up being pilloried in the zionist media.

Lord rogers helped to support an ethical architects group, "The sequence of events that has placed Lord Rogers in such an awkward corner began, unobtrusively enough, on February 2, when a group of 60 architects and planners met at the Richard Rogers Partnership beside the Thames in Putney - part of a complex that includes the River Cafe, co-owned by his wife, Ruth. The office was made available as a favour to one of the group's founders, Abe Hayeem, a London-based Jewish activist who is married to an Israeli. Lord Rogers has said he did not join the group, and merely addressed them briefly, leaving the meeting after 10 minutes. "From what I understand, it was a very general greeting, about how important is an ethical dimension in architecture," said Eyal Weizman, the Israeli architect who is a prominent critic of the country's government and who arrived shortly afterwards. Mr Hayeem denied that a boycott had been discussed. "The minute one criticises Israel, immediately people howl about boycotts," he told the Guardian. "Targeted action was vaguely discussed, but we're still in the process of formulating our decisions."" (Oliver Burkeman ‘Israel-Palestine conflict engulfs Rogers's $1.7bn New York project’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1726731,00.html March 9, 2006). His links with this group were then questioned by the jewish mafia in new york which wanted him to confess his allegiance to the racist jews-only state in palestine. Eventually lord rogers threw himself down at the feet of his jewish masters begging for mercy, "The Javits tax is one indication of how much will be at stake this morning when Lord Rogers appears at a summit of Jewish leaders to explain his connections to a British architects' group that opposes the barrier Israel is building in the West Bank, and supports a boycott of Israeli construction firms. Under attack by local politicians and others who are calling for his sacking, Lord Rogers will arrive at the offices of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organisations with a daunting brief. He must negotiate his way through a row that combines Israeli-Palestinian politics with a major public building project - two topics virtually guaranteed to cause contention in New York, even if the Javits centre had not been built in honour of Jacob Javits, a New York senator who was a staunch campaigner for Israel. Lord Rogers has already met Charles Gargano, the powerful chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, and issued a statement distancing himself from Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine, which held its inaugural meeting at his London headquarters last month. He said he opposed a boycott of Israeli companies - and, in a surprising passage, stated his support for Israel's right to build the barrier. "I abhor boycotts of any kind - of Israel or any other place," Lord Rogers said. "I unequivocally renounce Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine and have withdrawn my relationship with them." (Oliver Burkeman ‘Israel-Palestine conflict engulfs Rogers's $1.7bn New York project’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1726731,00.html March 9, 2006).

Dennis sewell concludes his article about the jewish/zionist influence in brutish society by stating, “Read the liberal press almost any day of the week, and you will find that israel comes off worst. The truth is that the zionist lobby does exist but it is a clueless bunch.”[43] Clueless is probably more apt a description of sewell than the zionist lobby. Brendan russell retorts that, “Dennis sewell claims that the zionist lobby is ineffectual .. Yet he admits that anyone who criticizes israel will be publicly smeared as an anti-semite; that sam kiley was forced to resign from the times when he tried to write about the israeli army’s murder of mohammed al-durrah; that journalists would only make negative comments about israel to him off the record, for fear of what would happen otherwise; that writers in the telegraph group admit “serious, critical reporting of israel is no longer tolerated” on their papers; and that these same writers were labelled ‘anti-semites’ in an article by their own proprietor.”[44]