Terra Firm no.22: The Terrorist War Against the Poor. The Second Proxy Zionist War? What goes Round Comes Round.

The negotiations between barak and the palestinians weren’t going anywhere because barak wouldn’t accept the creation of a palestinian state and he wouldn’t allow the return of palestinian refugees. Zionists claim that the palestinians were at fault for not taking the negotiations seriously but their participation in the negotiations had required enormous sacrifices, “We have given up three quarters of our historical rights in palestine for the sake of peace. Palestinians wanted peace but the israelis didn’t. Since the oslo peace accord they have demolished thousands of homes, confiscated thousands of acres of land and killed thousands of our people.”[8]

Fundamentalist zionists insisted that no concessions should be made to the palestinians. What followed was a turning point for politics in the middle east. Ariel sharon (otherwise known as the bulldozer for bulldozing the homes of palestinians) deliberately provoked the palestinians into violent protests. He did this for many reasons. Firstly, to help him gain the support of the zionist fundamentalists in his party so that he could beat benjamin netanhayu to become his party’s candidate in the next general election. Secondly, to gain the support of jewish fascists in the country to help him win the next general election. Thirdly, to make palestinians look like extremists so that public opinion around the world would sympathize with the zionists. And, fourthly, to enable him to end any further peace discussions because it was not possible to negotiate with extremists. Sharon’s dirty tactic worked a treat. He won his party’s candidacy for the general election. He won the general election. Politically, sharon’s tactic proved to be decisive.

The provocation that sharon used to bring about this chain of events was remarkably simple. At the end of september 2000 he paid a visit to a mosque in jerusalem, the third holiest in islam. The symbolism of his visit was intended to suggest that one day the zionists would take complete control of this building as they had taken control of so much of palestine. It also suggested the zionists were intent on taking over all of palestine and thus regaining all of the old testament land of israel, “Dozens of people were injured in rioting on the West Bank and in Jerusalem yesterday as the hawkish Likud party leader, Ariel Sharon, staged a provocative visit to a Muslim shrine at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Surrounded by hundreds of Israeli riot police, Mr Sharon and a handful of Likud politicians marched up to the Haram al-Sharif, the site of the gold Dome of the Rock that is the third holiest shrine in Islam. The symbolism of the visit to the Haram by Mr Sharon - reviled for his role in the 1982 massacre of Palestinians in a refugee camp in Lebanon - and its timing was unmistakable. "This is a dangerous process conducted by Sharon against Islamic sacred places," Yasser Arafat told Palestinian television. Although the Haram is part of Arab East Jerusalem, occupied illegally by Israel since 1967, Jews revere the esplanade, which they call the Temple Mount, as the site of a temple destroyed in AD70. The 35-acre site is the single biggest obstacle to peace and, as Mr Sharon asserted yesterday, an inalienable part of the Jewish state. Palestinians and Israeli liberals denounced the visit as a dangerous provocation. "The timing and the decision to visit the Haram was taken to flare up the area and to burn up the place,"said a blood-splattered Ahmed Tibi, an Israeli Arab member of the knesset, who suffered a broken wrist in the scuffles at the shrine. "He wants to see more blood and more killing. He wants to kill the peace."”[9]

There was, however, one small drawback to the success of sharon’s evil tactic - the deaths of many zionists. In other words, sharon deliberately provoked the palestinians into violence in order to achieve his political goals even though he knew this would leasd to the deaths of many zionists - and yet he was perfectly prepared to sacrifice his own people for his own political success. The deaths of zionists was crucial to his plan in frightening zionists to vote for him in the general election and then to support him building more illegal settlements and blocking peace negotiations.

The jewish influenced brutish media paid little attention to sharon’s evil tactic. It portrays the violence in palestine not as a spiral of violence and counter-violence but as something like a stack of plates. In this analogy, violence has a beginning and an end - palestinians are always responsible for initiating violence whereas zionist violence is only a response to such violence. Palestinian violence is not a response to previous zionist violence or provocations but is the start of a new round of violence to which the zionists are almost expected to retaliate. Palestinians start the violence so the zionists are completely justified in using violence to defend themselves. Zionists’ acts of violence are never depicted as triggering off palestinian violence - indeed, in the medias’ eyes, zionists never do anything to provoke violence. It is always palestinians who are the first to resort to violence and can thus be blamed for making it impossible for the zionists to reach a peace agreement with them.

The main way for the zionist state to expand in peacetime is by demolishing palestinian homes and businesses, confiscating their land, and then building illegal zionist settlements on this land. For sharon, the construction of settlements is vital because it is a deliberate act of provocation for further palestinian protests which sharon is then able to use provide a justification for building further settlements. They are also intended to shift the military balance of power between the zionists and palestinians, “There are some 200,000 Jewish settlers in the occupied Palestinian territories. Some are religious zealots, who believe fervently that the land is theirs, by the gift of God. Others are secular nationalists, equally passionate in their conviction that Israel must hold on to its 1967 conquests. The settlers control vast swathes of territory, connected by "security roads" patrolled by the military. In the Gaza Strip, where there are just 6,000 settlers living among 1m Palestinians, at least one fifth of the land is Israeli-controlled. The settlement issue is one of the most intractable issues facing Israel and the Palestinians in their interminable search for a lasting peace. There is also, within Israel, a fierce debate on the future of the Jewish communities of the conquered lands.”[11]; “Hebron is a city of some 130,000 people, of whom 500 are Jewish settlers of the most rabidly rightwing kind. They, and the soldiers guarding them, already control 20% of the city.”[12] Finally, the construction of illegal zionist settlements is also intended to scupper peace negotiations with palestinians, “However, in a letter to the US consul, Ron Schlicher, the Palestinian information minister, Yasser Abed Rabbo, condemned the continuation of settlement building, saying it has "always sent a message to the Palestinian people that Israel is not really interested in ending its illegal occupation".”[13]

The politician who for the last three decades has been at the forefront of new, illegal, zionist settlements is ariel sharon, “Sharon who, for three decades, has been the patron of the Jewish enclaves in the West Bank and Gaza, which are considered illegal under international law. According to an aerial survey by Israeli human rights group Peace Now last week, 25 new outposts have sprouted on the stony hills of the West Bank since Sharon became Prime Minister despite his promise to the US not to build any new settlements. ”[14] Everyday palestinians have to watch their house and businesses being demolished and then their land stolen for jewish settlements. The zionists have kept vast tracts of land empty in palestine for the simple reason that they biding their time to build new settlements - usually with the aid of american government funds which the american government refuses to use to provide housing for its own people in its own country.

It was ariel sharon who instituted the zionists’ ‘shoot to kill’ policy which has led to the assassination of 60 palestinians. This is a remarkably high number considering that it has been in operation only six months. There are now zionist death squads roaming palestinian areas searching for new palestinian targets. This is one of the main factors which makes the zionist state in palestine one of the world’s leading terrorist states. Sharon has carried out these provocations in order to provoke further protests from palestinians which has invariably enabled the zionist ,military forces to shoot more unarmed civilians.

Throughout the last couple of decades the zionist state in palestine has been ruled by a number of extreme right-wing zionists, one of them a mass murderer, who have done everything they could to avoid a peace agreement with the palestinians in order to increase the zionist occupation of palestine. Their oppression of the palestinian people has been appalling.

They execute palestinian “terrorists”, “The israeli army struck at the heart of yasser arafat’s administration by assassinating an officer in his personal security guard .. ayad joins more than 20 victims of israel’s official policy of assassinating palestinians it accuses of attacks on soldiers and civilians. All of the operations were sanctioned by outgoing prime minister, ehud barak, who yesterday sent “heartfelt congratulations” to the army for killing ayud.”[15]

The zionist government in palestine is flouting many united nations’ resolutions, "Since 1967, the United Nations Security Council has passed 15 resolutions criticizing Israel's behaviour. None of them have been acted upon. They include: Resolution 267 condemning Israel’s annexation of East Jerusalem in 1980; Resolution 441 calling for the creation of a UN Commission to examine illegal settlements in the occupied territories."[16] Prior to iraq's invasion of kuwait, the americans had blocked or watered down every resolution put to the security council condemning israel's infringements of human rights and the geneva convention.

The jewish lobby in america has forced the american government to legitimize the zionists illegal occupation of jerusalem, “In 1989, after lengthy pressure from the Jewish lobby, the United States' congress formally recognized jerusalem as the capital of israel - even though half the city had been invaded by israel during the 1967 war, illegally annexed, and was under illegal occupation, "On Tuesday, the House of Representatives joined the Senate in declaring Jerusalem as Israel's capital."[17] This shows congress's deliberate flouting of united nations’ resolutions and the extent to which it is dominated by zionist sympathizers.

The zionists’ treatment of palestinians is far more oppressive and violent than south africa’s treatment of blacks. The racist zionist state has been one of the main cause of wars and the bloodshed in the middle east ever since it was established. American governments finance and arm zionist racists and then turn their backs on the terrorism they perpetrate on palestinian people. Just a week before the september 11th bombings the zionist dominated american government yet again contemptuously turned its back on the rest of the world which was incensed about the apartheid regime in israel, “The united states yesterday pulled out of the united nations’ conference against racism after israel was criticised as “racist and apartheid”. The israeli team also quit the event in south africa in protest.”[18]

Robert fisk has stated that, “America's name is literally stamped on to the missiles fired by Israel into Palestinian buildings in Gaza and the West Bank. Only four weeks ago, I identified one of them as an AGM 114-D air-to-ground rocket made by Boeing and Lockheed-Martin at their factory in of all places Florida, the state where some of the suiciders trained to fly. It was fired from an Apache helicopter (made in America, of course) during the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, when hundreds of cluster bombs were dropped in civilian areas of Beruit by the Israelis in contravention of undertakings given to the United States. Most of the bombs had US Naval markings and America then suspended a shipment of fighter bombers to Israel for less than two months. The same type of missile this time an AGM 114-C made in Georgia was fired by the Israelis into the back of an ambulance near the Lebanese village of Mansori, killing two women and four children. I collected the pieces of the missile, including its computer coding plate, flew to Georgia and presented them to the manufacturers at the Boeing factory. And what did the developer of the missile say to me when I showed him photographs of the children his missile had killed? "Whatever you do," he told me, "don't quote me as saying anything critical of the policies of Israel."”[19]

The gulf war was only incidentally about the allies’ desire to protect the world’s oil supplies - after all if saddam hussein had taken control of kuwait he would have been as intent about selling oil as the kuwaitis. It wasn’t as if saddam was going to refuse to sell oil to the americans. Much more critically, the gulf war was a pre-emptive war to prevent the zionist government from waging war on iraq which would probably have triggered off a regional conflict with arab states.

The reason the americans and the brutish have maintained sanctions over iraq since the gulf war is to protect the zionists in palestine. The americans, the brutish, and the zionists have to prevent countries surrounding zionist occupied palestine from becoming militarily powerful in case they use these weapons against the zionists. They also have to prevent these countries from becoming industrially developed because they might use this expertise to construct weapons to attack the zionists. In other words, the entire region has to be kept in a de-industrialized state for the sake of maintaining zionists’ military domination of the region. There is little doubt that a fundamentalist zionist government would use its nuclear, chemical, and biological, weapons to create a holocaust across the middle east if it felt sufficiently threatened.

The allies’ tactic of demilitarizing and de-industrializing moslem countries around the zionists’ illegal occupation of palestine to prevent them from threatening the zionists, is also intended to encourage the zionists to negotiate peace with the palestinians. The fundamental drawback of this tactic is that all that it does is to make the fascist zionists feel even more confident about oppressing the palestinians thereby decreasing the prospects of peace. The zionists know they can get away with continually provoking palestinians when they have the support of the jewish lobbies in the brutish and american governments and the support of the jewish dominated brutish and american medias. The allies believe that racists like sharon will negotiate only from a position of strength but as soon as the racists are in a position of strength they provoke the palestinians and make it impossible for the palestinians to negotiate.

Ariel sharon’s provocations were deliberately intended to push more and more moslems into extremism. He wants palestinians to kill jews because he knows this will make the peace process more and more difficult. For many years sharon has been the great poisoner of zionist-palestinian relationships. Far worse, however, is that sharon, a mass murderer, poses the potential to carry out a far greater slaughter than bin laden. It is frequently stated that bin laden would have killed 50,000 or 500,000 americans if he could have done so. However, this is no different from ariel sharon. There is little doubt that sharon would exterminate the entire arab population in the middle east using the zionists’ nuclear, chemical, and biological, weapons should he feel that the zionists are under serious threat.

The special relationship that exists between america and the zionist government is far more intimate than the relationship between america and brutland. The american body politic is so dominated by what is politely called the jewish lobby that in foreign affairs the american government is more of a zionist puppet propping up its middle east master than a global superpower propping up one of its satellite countries.

During the build up of the allied coalition to fight against iraq, the allies promised arab/moslem countries that in return for their support for the war, the americans would make efforts to formulate a peace agreement between the palestinians and israelis. This was nearly achieved. But as soon as the mass murderer ariel sharon set foot in the haram al-sharif mosque and deliberately stirred up palestinian protests to help him win the zionist general election, all hopes for peace in the country disappeared. Provocation is a typical, everyday tactic used by the bigoted, intransigent, racist, fundamentalists dominating zionist politics. Hopes for peace grew even more distant when george bush came into office. His gross historical stupidity and complete disinterest in the world beyond america, led him, like so many other presidents before him, to turn his back on the middle east and allow the zionists in his own government, and in the zionist government, to carry out more and more acts of barbarism on the palestinian people. He was more concerned about playing golf than in curbing zionist oppression of palestinians. In other words, the american government was fulfilling its old habit - first stir up a conflict, then turn its back on the conflict by reneging upon a promise to bring about peace. American people believe they can stand tall in the world but to vast numbers of people around the world all they see are americans’ backs as they head off home to the luxuries of their cornucopian paradise. Perhaps american presidents have watched too many films in which cowboys ride off into the sunset with their backs to the camera and believe there is something profoundly macho in riding away from problems and leaving people to stew in the mess they’ve just created. In effect, the allies reneged on their promise to bring peace to the middle east. They allowed the zionist fascists to avoid agreeing to the creation of a palestinian state.

4. The Global Jewish Conspiracy of Silence.

Jews have so much influence on the american and brutish media they’ve been able to reinforce a racist division between islamic, and non islamic, peoples. For example, many films/tv series/tv programmes are financed by jews, directed by jews, and are dominated by jewish actors.[20] Hollywood has a strong progressive ethos which has led to efforts to incorporate non-jews into the industry so there have been lots of blacks and some chinese/oriental, actors in films/tv - but very few from arab/islamic countries.[21] Let’s take for example the very progressive ‘ali mcbeal’. This has featured many weird and wonderful characters, and people of many races - but not moslems.

Over the last couple of decades, the jewish dominated media in both america and brutland has covered up the racist nature of the zionist state, zionist terrorism against palestinians, and the zionist impoverishment of palestinian people. It has done its best to prevent news of zionists’ racist oppression of palestinians from being mentioned in the media.[23] This is nothing less than a global zionist conspiracy of silence. It is rare for the brutish media to analyze the zionist governments’ gross injustices on palestinians let alone for it to blame zionist fascists for what they’ve been doing. It is quite remarkable how for decades the brutish media helped to harass the south african government for being racist whilst saying nothing about the zionists’ oppression of palestinians.

For the first couple of weeks after the september 11th bombings, the global jewish conspiracy reasserted itself as country after country talked about opposing terrorism but said nothing about zionist state terrorism in palestine. All countries insisted on the need to stop the financing and arming of terrorists whilst completely neglecting the american government’s financing and arming of zionist state terrorists in palestine. So effective was this refusal to discuss zionist state terrorism that it revealed the most enormous chasm between west and east, between those living in the rich world and those living in the poor world. Everytime a political leader in the rich world mentioned the word ‘terrorist’, livestock consumers immediately thought about islamic/arabic fundamentalists whilst such comments in third world countries made the poor think about zionists’ occupation of palestine. Islamic people scream at consumer livestock ‘What about zionist terrorism?’ ‘What about zionist racism?’ but the livestock are too preoccupied with consumerist spectacles to be bothered about what they’re trying to say. Consumer livestock have no understanding that the zionist government in palestine is a terrorist state. They don’t want to understand that zionists are colonizers who are occupying land they have stolen from particular palestinian people and are thus terrorists by definition. To the extent that their minds drift onto the topic, they seem to believe zionists would be able to live peacefully in palestine if it wasn’t for those pesky palestinian moslem terrorists demanding their property be given back to them. They either don’t understand, or believe it to be irrelevant, that zionists have stolen, and are continuing to steal, land from palestinian people who want it back.

Since the establishment of the zionist state in palestine both the american and the brutish governments have operated on the basis that the zionist state was a freedom loving, liberal democracy. After the september 11th bombings the american and brutish governments quickly began to realize that if they were to win the support of arab countries and moderate moslems then they were going to have to make efforts to resolve the palestinian-zionist conflict. So, on october 2nd mcblair stated his support for greater equality between zionists and palestinians and, a few hours later, mcbush declared his support for a palestinian state. However, neither of them would make any criticism of the racist nature of the zionist state. Both continued to hold that the zionist state in palestine was a legitimate liberal democracy which protects political freedoms - much like their own governments.

The problem for mcbush and mcblair in defining the zionist state in palestine as a liberal democracy is that this means the zionist state is a legitimate government and this automatically means that palestinians fighting against this legitimate state have to be cast as terrorists - which is a little odd since they are fighting to regain their own land and to obtain rights denied them by the racists in the zionist government. Neither mcbush nor mcblair would dare to regard the zionist state in palestine as a terrorist state.

After the september 11th bombings, the most prominent feature of the global jewish conspiracy of silence was the refusal to mention that ariel sharon was a mass murderer who ought to be brought to justice. The west claimed they were waging war against terrorists and that it was a question of justice arresting bin laden for his terroristic activities whilst, at the same time, ignoring ariel sharon. To moslem public opinion this discrimination between two mass murderers showed the allies were just being racist and anti-moslem. To moslems, and independent people around the world, the allies were beginning to look increasingly like racist bigots concerned only with punishing moslem terrorists not zionist terrorists. No amount of reasoned arguments by sharon-loving western politicians would ever convince moslems, that what the allies were doing was anything other than perpetuating racism and global injustices by focusing on bin laden rather than ariel sharon. Either the allies had to change their position or they were going to look more and more like bigoted racists.

Another major component of the global jewish conspiracy of silence was pretending the zionists’ oppression of palestinians did not contribute to bin laden’s rationale for the september 11th bombings. There were those who argued that bin laden was only taking advantage of the palestinian issue to promote his own cause i.e. removing american troops from saudi arabia, “Bin Laden is only doing what Saddam Hussein did in 1990: Saddam pioneered the concept of "linkage" between Palestine and any (separate) crisis of another's making. Having perpetrated his great act of international banditry, the rape of Kuwait, Saddam announced he would withdraw from it as soon as Israel withdrew from the occupied territories.”[24] This line that september 11th had nothing to do with the zionist racism in palestine has been taken up not surprisingly by many zionists, including james rubin, around the world, “Zalman Shoval, former Israeli ambassador to the US, wrote last week that he saw no connection between fundamentalist terror and "Israeli occupation"; it all stemmed from extremist Islam's hatred of anything to do with democracy, freedom, or human rights. It is the same mind-set that caused mayor Rudolph Giuliani to reject the $10m donation to New York city from the Saudi tycoon Prince Walid bin Talal. Even the Washington Post, in an editorial last week, argued that "the largest single cause of Islamic extremism and terrorism is not Israel, nor US policy on Iraq", but pro-western Arab governments that "encourage state-controlled clerics and media to promote the anti-western, anti-modern and anti-Jewish propaganda of the Islamic extremists".”[25] However, this view is disputed even by pro-american arab leaders, “Even the resolutely pro-American King Abdullah of Jordan told the US that he doubted New York would ever have happened had it addressed the Arab-Israel conflict in a more serious, less partisan, way.”[26] In 1990, saddam hussein did not invaded kuwait in order to liberate Palestine but he, along with all most other arabs, was incensed at the injustices being perpetrated by zionists in palestine and by their american backers. The palestinian issue has been the key barometer of western-moslem relationships. It is about whether western countries support racism or oppose it.

In the aftermath of the september 11th bombings the world’s politicians continued to abide by the global jewish conspiracy and never mentioned zionist racism or zionist terrorism in palestine. Thus when mcblair addressed parliament on september 14th he .. “devoted only one sentence to the root cause of the terror - the arab-israeli conflict. He argued that the peace process should “if at all possible” be moved forward but later admitted he had no specific ideas on how this should, or could be done. There you have it. A call to arms, with the imprecise objective of stamping out worldwide terror and - very much in third place - sorting out the causes of terror.”[27]

For the last couple of decades the most blatant tenet of the global jewish conspiracy was that western politicians should never use the world ‘palestine’. Successive zionist governments have insisted that the country known as palestine no longer existed - there was only a zionist state called “israel”. It has to be asked, how is it going to be possible to bring peace to palestine when zionist racists are able to force governments around the world to avoid using the name of the country to which these governments are trying to bring peace? Is it not amazing that zionists have such power that they can force politicians around the world not to use this word? When jack straw, the brutish foreign minister, used the word on a tour of the middle east the zionist fundamentalists reacted with rage - the country’s leading racist, and mass murderer, ariel sharon, refused to meet him, “Mr straw, who started a four day tour of the middle east yesterday, prompted controversy by writing a letter in which he twice referred to palestine. The israelis do not recognize the term for that part of the middle east. An israeli cabinet minister called mr straw’s comments an “obscenity” which, he said, turned israel from the victim of terrorism into the accused.”[28] Straw also stated the obvious: that zionist’s racial oppression of palestinians was helping to breed terrorism. The zionists were furious about this too and cancelled the planned meeting between the terrorist mass murderer and jack straw (who apparently was supposedly organizing a fight against terrorists). This meeting went ahead only after the brutish prime minister contacted the mass murderer and agreed to abide by the global jewish conspiracy and also agreed that straw would commiserate with zionist state terrorists, “The row began when mr straw said anger over the plight of the palestinians was helping to breed terror. He also referred to Palestine, a term israel does not recognize. Downing street said “no offence was intended” by mr straw’s remarks. The prime minister’s spokesman said the government will go back to referring to the “Palestinian controlled authorities” instead of palestine. Mr straw said, “I stand very firmly against the terrorism which the israeli people have suffered.””[29]

The global jewish conspiracy of silence is imposed not merely upon brutish, but upon american, politicians, “(Straw) dares to say the “P” word - palestine - which washington fight shy of.”[30] The fear of mentioning the word ‘palestine’ seems to have spread after the september 11th bombings when the wacky chelsea football club decided they would not wear the logo of the united arab emirates when they played a zionist football team for fear of upsetting the sensibilities of their racist hosts! It is believed ariel sharon’s fascist government is going to insist that in future all politicians around the world should stop using the names of arab countries because he wants to park his zionists tanks around the region to carry out an arab wide cull of moslem terrorists.

The september 11th bombings were an attack on america and on global capitalism but, just as importantly, they were also an attack on the jewish ownership of the twin towers;[31] the many jewish companies operating in the twin towers; and on american jews and zionists working in the twin towers in retribution for decades of american-zionist oppression of islamic peoples around the world especially the palestinians. The twin towers were a symbol of jewish financial power as the statue of liberty is a symbol of political freedom. The global jewish conspiracy requires the allies to avoid mentioning any of these facts. Is it not utterly amazing that no commentators around the world have ever mentioned the bombings were targeted at jewish interests?

The american jewish lobby, and the jews in the american government, perceived the september 11th bombings as a threat to jewish interests and wanted the american government to attack terrorists - by which they meant anti-zionist terrorists because they do not believe that the zionist state in palestine commits any terrorist activities. The allies’ propaganda over the bombings is in perfect accord with the global jewish conspiracy. It focuses on one issue, (anti-zionist) terrorism, and turns jewish realities i.e. ownership of the twin towers and zionist terrorism, into unmentionables or invisibles.

Some jews and their supporters try to encourage closer ties between europe and zionist occupied palestine by pretending that zionist occupied palestine is a european country. It’s just a geographical misfortune that palestine lies in the middle east. The european nature of zionist state is also emphasized by pointing out that it has a similar political democracy as those in europe.

The jewish dominated brutish media cultivates this illusion in a negative way by never covering palestine’s domestic politics because brutish people would then discover how little they have in common with zionists, despite their judaeo-christian origins. Brutish people would be horrified by zionists’ religious zealotry and ideology and would be appalled by the fact that the jewish knesset is like a parliament full of ian paisely’s. Brutish people are tolerant of hassidic jews living in north london (despite their appallingly high birth rate of 8 children per family many of whom end up on illegal settlements in zionist occupied palestine) because they cannot force their views on brutish people but in palestine extreme right wing religious parties, which often hold the balance of power in the knesset, are always trying to impose talmudic law on secular jews. The assassination of rehavam zeevi, the zionist government’s minister for tourism, was a master stroke since for the first time on brutish television one of ariel sharon’s closest friends was revealed to be a crypto-nazi.

The global jewish conspiracy in brutland is so strong amongst the ranks of the anti-racist, politically correct brigade that they believe that discussions of zionist racism are irrelevant to solving europe’s refugee crisis. Take for example polly toynbee who believes the best way of solving the flood of refugees around europe is by ending civil wars and redistributing wealth to poorer countries. This is a argument has a great deal of validity but it is inadequate because she believes the issue of zionist racism in palestine is irrelevant to this problem. It is not irrelevant. The allies’ pro-semitic racism not only provoked the gulf war against iraq it is responsible for the terrible impoverishment of iraq which is leading people to flee the country. It is now the cause of a second proxy zionist war, this time against afghanistan, which is further boosting the number of refugees moving across the continent. These refugee problems are being caused by zionists and yet she refuses to believe any discussion of zionists’ racism is relevant, “But the majority of asylum seekers will never be sent back, even if they are not genuine. Most arrive from countries that will not take them back, such as china. It is impossible to land planeloads of refused asylum seekers in iraq, iran or afghanistan. Look where refugees come from. Afghanistan, tops the list, followed by somalia, iraq, sri lanka, turkey (kurds mainly), pakistan, iran .. Refugees flee the most horrible regimes and war torn areas, not the silent poverty of the world’s hungriest nations. The politics of immigration are poisonous. A mori poll finds that there are too many immigrants here. Clueless, they think nonwhites are 26% of the british population (the proportion is 7%). But there is no big answer. Only ending civil wars and more fairly distributing global wealth would reach root causes of mass migration. The un wasted its scant energy this week on empty rows about race and history, when the crises that force millions to flee wait for international solutions.”[32]

5. Global Jewish Propaganda.

The global jewish conspiracy is concerned with covering up topics which jews do not want mentioned in public or in political debates. Its counterpart is global jewish propaganda which seeks to publicize and promote specific values and beliefs. Whilst the global jewish conspiracy of silence is a negative ideology in that it seeks to render political issues invisible, the global jewish propaganda is just like any other ideology - it wants to publicize certain values and beliefs so that they are commonly accepted.

Over the years, zionist racists in palestine have developed an ideology to dissuade people from supporting palestinian freedom fighters - in particular the phenomena of palestinian suicide bombers i.e. people who are willing to sacrifice their lives because they can no longer put up with the fascists’ vile and brutal oppression of their people. After the september 11th bombings, the zionist fundamentalists started expounded this ideology around the world in the hope of winning world opinion to their cause. This propaganda was rapidly dissipated by various zionists in america and brutland who look to the zionist government in palestine to tell them which propaganda tactics to publicize.

The basic tenet of global zionist propaganda is that moslem fundamentalists are like nazis. They are so extreme they not merely want the abolition of the state of israel but seek the slaughter of all infidels. This leads to the proposition that it is not possible to negotiate with them. The only way to deal with them is through military action. Doubtlessly there are palestinians and moslems who hold such extreme views but the point is they have been driven to this position by decades of zionists’ vile persecution. Zionists have rendered millions of palestinians homeless, propertyless, and stateless. They have murdered tens of thousands of palestinians. Many zionist fundamentalists such as ariel sharon would love to expel all palestinians from their own country if only world opinion would tolerate such a policy.

The global jewish propaganda was first expounded to a brutish audience in all its true nastiness by benjamin netanhayu when he was interviewed by david frost a few days after the september 11th bombings - see article below. James rubin helped to spread this propaganda whenever he participated in media debates in brutland about the september 11th bombings. Unfortunately, these ideas also started being regurgitated by brutish commentators e.g. tony parsons - see below. Perhaps worst of all - they were also being regurgitated by the brutish government. The zionists were hoping that since bin laden was being blamed for the september 11th bombings, it would be easy to cast the palestinians in the same light which would then enable sharon to send in his tanks to slaughter all suspected palestinian terrorists and all those suspected of harbouring or aiding such terrorists - including of course yasser arafat.

Jack straw’s tour of the middle east at the end of september included a meeting with the area’s biggest terrorist, ariel sharon. When he arrived in zionist occupied palestine he was expected, like all other visiting politicians, to pay his respects to concentration camp victims at the zionists’ museum on the holocaust. The idea of this is to try and make non-jewish politicians guilty about what happened in the concentration camps so that they condone zionist state terrorists slaughtering palestinians. Straw emerged from the visit duly stupefied, “Foreign secretary jack straw visited jerusalem’s holocaust memorial Yad vashem where he put on a skull cap and laid a wreath in memory of those killed. Mr straw said, “I have been very deeply moved.”[33] Personal Note.[34]

Unfortunately, during his meeting with the zionist fundamentalist and mass murderer, ariel sharon, straw seems to have been persuaded to extol the new global jewish propaganda. The first tenet of this propaganda is that bin laden is the new adolf hitler. As straw stated, “The best historical parallel, i’m afraid to say, is those at the top of the nazi regime.”[35] The mirror’s headline for its article on straw’s visit to palestine was, ‘Bin Laden is the new Hitler’. It might be expected that the most sensationalist brutish hacks might equate bin laden with adolf hitler but to hear straw peddling such an extremist zionist idea is a little worrying - since it seriously devalues the evil perpetrated by adolf hitler.

Straw also adopted the second tenet of the global jewish conspiracy: that it isn’t possible to negotiate with moslem fundamentalists, “It wasn’t possible to negotiate with hitler, although some people understandably but naively thought that it was. You can’t negotiate with these people.”[36] - although one thing’s for sure, at least moslem fundamentalists aren’t so ideologically blinkered that they’re incapable of mentioning the words ‘palestine’ and palestinian state’.

The third tenet was that since bin laden is the new adolf hitler then, if he’d had the chance, he would have killed not merely 5,000 americans but 50,000 or even 500,000. It ought to be pointed out that even if he succeeded in killing 500,000 million americans it would still not be as many as the one million iraqi children who have died as a result of american and brutish sanctions on the iraqi government. As has been pointed out above, bin laden’s willingness to kill much larger numbers of people is matched only by ariel sharon’s willingness to carry out an even greater slaughter.

What we have here is a brutish foreign secretary who goes to zionists occupied palestine in order to shake hands with a mass murder and terrorist during a campaign to combat terrorism! And this after he’d allowed the release of the fascist general pinocet. He then comes back to brutland regurgitating the zionist propaganda that the racist zionist state is a liberal democracy and that palestinian freedom fighters are terrorists. What many people would like to know, is why straw believes it is reasonable to talk to a mass murderer like ariel sharon who is responsible for murdering 1000-2000 people in the sabra and chatilla palestinian refugee camps but not bin laden who killed 5,000? If bin laden had killed only 1000-2000 people would straw have gone to talk with him in one of his caves? Quite interestingly, when straw finished his speech at the labour party conference he was given polite applause and nobody even attempted to stand. Perhaps they too are beginning to realize that straw has spent too much of his political life grovelling around terrorists to be taken seriously.

6. Terrorism as a Mass Spectacle.

Bin laden was born into a wealthy saudi arabian family. He is reputed to be one of 54 sons. It is alleged that he grew up as a normal, albeit over-privileged, teenager. It wasn’t until he went to university that he became a moslem radical. The soviet union invaded afghanistan on december 25th 1979 and bin laden, then 22, left immediately to join the ‘holy war’ against the soviet army.

In afghanistan he became .. “a recruiter of ‘arab afghans’, the thousands of arabs who left homes in egypt, algeria and saudia arabia to join the mujahedeen. Using his personal fortune he helped to finance the training camps that prepared them to fight the soviets for almost a decade.”[37]; “He financed the recruitment, transportation and arming of thousands of palestinians, saudis, tunisians, somalians, egyptians, and pakistanis to fight.”[38] This experience and the contacts he built up enabled him in 1989 to set up, finance, and orchestrate, the al-qaeda global military network. In other words, he’d already been establishing contacts and building up a network for ten years before he established his own organization. During the war he developed close contacts with the cia, “Ironically it was the cia, who provided him with missiles and arms for that struggle.”[39]

The network of religious schools in pakistan which provided the students for the taliban also fed al qaeda, “Ranks of young schoolboys rock back and forth on their knees, chanting prayers. But this is no ordinary school and these are not ordinary prayers. This is a taliban recruitment factory and the prayers are simply war cries. In the court yard of this madrassah - a religious school in pakistan - 3,500 students aged five and 25 ... The college, the dar-ul-uloom haqqania, in the village of akora khattak, 30 miles south of pashwar, is an ideological school run by 70 teachers from pakistan and afghanistan for thousands of international militant muslims. It is run by sami-ul-haq, a 70 year old man ... He is proud his religious seminary has produced 90% of the notorious taliban regime which rules afghanistan and shelters terrorist warlord osama bin laden. Tens of thousands of students at pakistan’s 6,000 madrassahs have vowed to take up arms in afghanistan against the anticipated us revenge strikes. ‘We give them knowledge, the taliban give them guns,” Haq says. He is believed to be one of bin laden’s closest friends in pakistan.”[40] Most of these students are either the offspring of afghani refugees in pakistan or pakistanis but most belong to the same ethnic group, the pashtuns which makes up the major ethnic group in afghanistan.

The end of the war with the russians was quickly followed by the gulf war. The saudi arabian royal family allowed the american military to use their country as one of the bases from which to launch the war against iraq. It is alleged that bin laden was appalled by the shame this brought upon islam not merely because a moslem country allowed itself to be used by a non-moslem military force to attack another moslem country but because american soldiers were allowed to drink alcohol and be entertained by exotic dancers. He vowed revenge on both the american and saudi governments.

Bin laden was based in afghanistan and peshawar, pakistan from 1989 until 1991.[41] He then went to sudan to further his war aims.[42] He became close friends with sudan’s leader hassan al-turabi and, it is alleged, married one of his niece’s. He then began to make a series of major strikes against the united states’ military. First there was the bombing of american troops in saudi arabia. Then, “In 1993, he was suspected of being involved in the killing of 18 u.s. soldiers in somalia.”[43] He is also believed to have played a major role in the first bombing of the world trade centre in 1993.

In 1996, bin laden returned to afghanistan and the network of training camps he’d established there. His next major terrorist action was the bombing of two american embassies in africa, “Osama bin laden has claimed credit for the attack on the us embassies in kenya and tanzania in august 1998 which killed 224 and injured nearly 5,000 ..”[44] In response to these attacks, clinton agreed to a cruise missile attack on bin laden in afghanistan and on a chemical factory in sudan - the factory that might have been financed by bin laden, “On august 20th 1998 clinton unleashed 50 cruise missiles on bin Laden’s bases in Afghanistan which killed 26 and injured 40. Another 25 missiles hit a suspected chemical weapons plant in the Sudanese capital Khartoum. Twelve were injured.”[45] At the time the extreme right wing loonies in america had embroiled clinton in the political scandal over monica lewinsky, so he had little chance to organize any more serious action on bin laden’s guerrilla bases. The americans forced the sudanese government to expel him from the country. It should be noted that around this time the islamic sudanese government had been enforcing the sharia law with increasing zeal causing terrible conflicts with non-moslem africans in the south of the country.

Bin laden’s family ran a construction company in saudi arabia which had made them enormously wealthy. Bin laden’s experiences in the family firm turned out to be a considerable asset to him when he went to afghanistan to join the holy war against the russians. Afghanistan is a mountainous country and has a long history of peoples excavating into the mountains to create homes and storage facilities. Bin laden must have quickly realized its military potential as a stronghold against the russians, “For almost nine centuries caves in afghanistan have provided shelter from invading armies. During the war with the soviet union the young bin laden brought his expertise from his family’s construction company and money to pay for bulldozers and other equipment to create the taliban’s underground lairs. One tunnel system at Zhawar has 41 caves, each around 30 feet by 12 feet. All are equipped with electricity. It was at a complex of caves in jalalabad in 1988 that bin laden saw the potential of underground cities. Ironically, he was funded by the american cia in the tunnel construction.. He worked on a tunnel complex in the mountains of the paktiya, a few miles from the border with pakistan. It is believed there are between 30 and 50 tunnel and cave complexes in afghanistan .. . Many of the cave systems have been mothballed by al qaeda and only opened when it was decided to move position. As well as those complexes which have been strengthened and extended in recent years, much of afghanistan’s plains are criss-crossed by underground irrigation channels known as karez. Many are 100 feet deep and used by villagers to hide or move from place to place unseen.”[47]

It is alleged, by his enemies, that bin laden could have trained over 40,000 people in these camps over the last decade or so and that they might now be established in more than 60 different countries.[48] It is believed he has access to a huge array of weaponry. Some commentators allege, “With his connections in saudi arabia, where his father became one of the country’s richest men as a builder, and to other areas of the arab world he has access to some of the most sophisticated explosives and weapons.”[49] However, most of the weaponry will be second-rate and second-hand. It is suspected that he could have created chemical weapons either through the factory in sudan or through a chemical factory he might have built in afghanistan. However, such weapons are useless without any means of delivering them and even if they could be delivered their effect on oomans is largely determined by prevailing weather conditions. They also have to be used quickly after manufacture because of natural degradation. This means they are not very versatile as a weapon because they cannot be transported around the world and then hidden until such time as people can be put in place to use them.

The idea of a terrorist group taking on the world’s greatest military power seems absurd - what could a mere handful of individuals do against the enormous resources of the world’s greatest military might. But bin laden has had nearly twenty years to build up a network of contacts around the world. He had a base in the mountains of afghanistan which are virtually impregnable even against the most sophisticated and powerful bombs - with the exception of small nuclear weapons of course. When constructing his defences in these mountains he has had two invaluable experiences which may have enabled him to make these defences even more impregnable. It took the russian army nearly 8 months to break into one cave system which cost them 24 helicopters. Bin laden could have learnt valuable information from this attack about how to fortify his defences. And in 1998 the americans attacked these mountainous strongholds with cruise missiles which may have given him vital insights into how he could survive another cruise missile bombardment.

Bin laden is highly-educated, highly-cultured, highly intelligent, rich, worldly-wise, and battle hardened. He had a vast number of contacts around the world providing him with on-the-spot information about what is happening. If anyone in the world appreciates the full scale of america’s evil around the world it is him. The hatred engendered in him by america’s carnage in vietnam, iran, iraq, afghanistan, palestine, algeria, etc must be intense. No normal, decent, respectable, caring, individual with the slightest degree of integrity can feel anything other than the most appalling, sickening, disgust for what america has done in these countries. As a reminder, “Unesco estimates that more than half a million children have died directly as a result of sanctions in the past ten years.”[50] Such horrors are all too likely to have swamped bin laden’s feelings of compassion and reason.

There are reasons for suggesting that the september 11th bombings were the greatest act of terrorism ever known. Bin laden outwitted the cia and america’s other security services, “The surprise attack on america exposed another glaring hole in the ability of the cia, hailed as the world’s leading spy organization. An estimated £15 billion is spent by the cia each year on intelligence gathering designed to protect the people of america from foreign threats.”[51] - but then these organizations have always been more concerned with buying and selling drugs and promoting terrorism not detecting it.[52]

This was a tremendously devastating victory against multiple enemies for a man who lives in caves in a poverty stricken country that has no telephone or postal services, and no water, gas, or electricity, supplies, “With his four wives and children he inhabits a small cave in eastern afghanistan. They have no running water and only a rudimentary heating system against the extreme cold of the eastern winter.”[54] Even members of the american military have expressed their admiration for the sheer audacity, and professionalism, of this attack.[55]

The september 11th bombings were unique in many ways. Firstly, they were the first televisual terrorist spectacular. Americans were able to watch this disaster unfold on their screens almost as it happened. They missed only the opening credits - but then this is not unusual for consumers who spend ages surrounding themselves with snacks, confectioneries, and beverages (produced from materials imported from around the world) before sitting down in front of their televisions to enjoy an evening’s entertainment. After the first plane smashed into the north trade centre tower, television crews rushed to the scene to record the fire billowing into the sky. They were in place to catch the arrival of the second aeroplane. One news station was broadcasting the north tower fire and the commentator was so busy talking over the incident he failed to notice the second plane coming into view and smashing into the southern tower - people in the studio could be heard frantically shouting at him to stop talking and take notice of what had just happened. It was at this point that millions of people in america and around the world realized a bewildering tragedy had dramatically turned into an ominous, frightful disaster. The fireball that erupted in the southern world trade centre is likely to be analogous to the shock experienced by millions of americans who suddenly realized they were being attacked. And, then, just like in a movie, the drama was heightened through flashbacks as video footage of the bombings was rushed into news studios and shown on television. As the afternoon wore on more and more video footage of the disaster, taken from different angles, was shown on tv over and over again.[56]

Perhaps much more incredible than bin laden’s victories over the cia, the american military, global capitalism, and global jewish financial interests, was that he managed to beat hollywood by creating a sensational spectacular which no film has ever come close to matching, “No thriller writer or film maker could have dreamed their wildest imaginings would come true in such an appalling tragedy.”[57] For all its sophisticated writers, dazzling special effects, and dolby surround sound, hollywood has never produced anything as spellbinding as the events of september 11th.[58] There is little doubt that bin-laden introduced a theatrical flare into his terrorist operations in order to boost their propaganda value, “But the clearest evidence of his terrorist capabilities came in the 1998 bombings of the us embassies in tanzania and kenya, when two suicide bombers hundreds of miles apart blew themselves up within minutes of each other.”[59] In a society facing a barrage of spectacular films, none comes anywhere near to the impact of this event.[60]

The theatrical nature of the september 11th bombings is one of their most important features. It is not that moslem warriors were so sick and tired of jews denying them any place in the american/brutish media that they decided they were going to out-hollywood, hollywood. It is that bin laden realized the only way he could get his message through to american consumers about the degree of terrorism and injustice their governments have perpetuated around the world was by creating a spectacle they could not ignore. Americans are so domesticated, and so preoccupied by media spectaculars and consumption extravaganzas, they are not in the least bit interested in the outside world and it is virtually impossible for the outside world to get through to them. The only way of communicating with americans was in a format with which they are familiar. Bin laden probably realized that his theatrical bombings in africa had simply not penetrated the domestication process that locks american consumers into their way of life. It achieved front page headlines for a short period of time but thereafter americans lost interest. These outrages simply weren’t powerful enough to force the american public to engage in any fundamental questioning of america’s role in the world. Only a truly spectacular act would be powerful enough to do this.

It doesn’t matter what the american government does to quench americans’ thirst for revenge; it doesn’t matter whether the allies succeed in capturing/murdering all those involved in planning the september 11th bombings; the images of the two aeroplanes crashing into the world trade towers and the eventual collapse of these towers will live forever in ooman history as one of the greatest spectacles ever witnessed. The sinking of the titanic, the conflagration of the hindenburg, are tragedies that captured the public’s imagination but they are dwarfed by the awesome, spectacle of the september 11th bombings. Much more significantly, however, is that these acts will turn bin laden into a legend. All cultures have their semi-historical heroes who fight against overwhelming odds e.g. hercules defending a bridge against a large number of attackers; david battling goliath; robert the bruce; robin hood, etc. Many moslems living in destitution will look upon bin laden in the same way - as a hero fighting back against seemingly insuperable odds. There is nothing that can be done to prevent the transformation of this spellbinding event into a legend - especially if the numbers of the world’s destitute continues to grow.

For one set of terrorists to have succeeded in hijacking an aircraft and smashing it into one of the world trade towers, the second tallest building in america and one of the tallest around the world, would have been rated, from a terrorist perspective, a spectacular success. But, for a second set of terrorists to smash another aircraft into the other tower was astounding. For these two gigantic, overpowering, seemingly impervious, towers to crumple under the impact of these attacks was the final element of the drama. It is not known whether the terrorists knew these crashes would bring about the collapse of these towers. Surely this would have been beyond their wildest hopes and expectations?

As recordings of the attacks were broadcast on television most of them seemed to show the second aircraft travelling in a straight line towards the tower. But there was one in particular, shown only on cnn, which was shot from behind the aircraft. There was a definite hint of the pilot swinging the aircraft around and down into the building to make sure that every piece of the aircraft ploughed into the building. After the hijackers of this second aircraft had taken control of the aircraft the pilot must have seen smoke on the horizon. As he made his approach he would gradually have realized the smoke was coming from the north tower. He may even have started to use it as a beacon to guide him to his target. One wonders what he must have thought when he realized the north tower had already been attacked. It is possible he might not have known anything about the first attack. He and the other hijackers on the plane might have believed they were on a solo mission, “It is possible that although the planes were hijacked at the same time, the two cells had no idea of the other’s existence.”[61] But whether the pilot knew about the first attack or not, the realization that the north tower had already been attacked must have triggered off the most tremendous surge of euphoria. Black basketball players are often shown in slow motion action almost floating through the air and then slam dunkin’ the ball through a hoop. The second pilot, seeing the first tower ablaze, seemed as if he too was slam dunking this huge unwieldy aircraft into a triumphant score as he banked the aircraft and aimed it lower and lower down the building to maximize the impact.[62] The contrast between his feelings of triumphalism and those of the passengers sitting in the aircraft in a state of utter disbelief and frightful terror, could hardly be greater - the symbolism here being all too blatant.[63] Usually it’s the poor, who live in a state of numb terror, and americans who exist in a state of euphoria over their grossly extravagant lifestyle.

The film called ‘dr. strangelove’ starring peter sellars is about the insane characters in the american military who drive oomancruels to self-obliteration through nuclear war. In the final scene, an engineer on an american nuclear bomber flying over russia tries to dislodge a nuclear bomb stuck in the aircraft’s underbelly. He succeeds - only to find himself straddling the bomb, as if in a rodeo, as it plummets to the ground - thereby triggering off armageddon. He insanely hollers ‘yahooooo’ celebrating the total devastation to come. This is the image which imposes itself over the film of the second pilot when he slam dunks the aircraft into the second tower.

The september 11th bombings were unique in a number of ways. Two aspects of this have been highlighted above. Firstly, they were the first televisual terrorist act. And, secondly, they were the first theatrical terrorist act.

The scale of the numbers killed was also unique. There has never before been an act of terrorism on such an appalling scale. It is the first example of what has been acknowledged as ‘mass terrorism’.

The fourth unique characteristic of the september 11th bombings was that the victims were not of one race, creed, or colour. America grieves for the people who lost their lives as if they were all americans but the victims were from 80 different nations. It has not been mentioned how many american jews lost their lives in this tragedy because the global jewish conspiracy does not want such a fact mentioned even though one of the prime reasons for bin laden’s attack on the towers of babel was precisely the presence of so many jewish owned companies. This was as much of a strike against jewish interests as it was against american interests. It was as much of a revenge attack on zionist state terrorism in palestine as on american state terrorism.

The september 11th bombings were also unique because they were a global event. Not merely the first terrorist event witnessed on television in one country but the first to be screened around the world. It provoked a global response to the events, a shared global experience.[64]

There is no other country in the world where the government would have allowed the screening of such an event. In brutland, the government would have taken control over the media and determined what could have been shown on television and what could not. The brutish political elite which is composed mainly of the country’s landowning pharming aristocracy, treats its subjects as livestock. It believes it is imperative to prevent the livestock from being spooked. That americans had the right to watch news’ coverage of this event was a fundamental triumph of america’s political constitution. Once again, the beacon of american democracy was powerful enough to illuminate even one of the country’s darkest moments. There were many heroes who emerged out of this disaster and they have been given due credit in the media but the american constitution also needs recognition. After all, this is part of the problem, that the american constitution is not given enough praise. Tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of people watched this disaster but it would not have been seen elsewhere around the world. The american constitution had a real impact on people’s lives around the world. The question is whether americans should seek to use their constitution to encourage more political freedoms in all other countries around the world or just ignore the global value of their most precious asset?

It is necessary to compare the september 11th slaughter with other examples of ooman violence against oomans in order to accurately gauge its significance. In comparison to the slaughter that oomans are carrying out on Animals around the world the september 11th fatalities were virtually insignificant.

In the past there have been many massacres that were far, far worse than that which took place on september 11th. It is alleged there was a day in the american civil war when over 23,000 americans were killed. There were huge bloodbaths during the first and second world wars e.g. brutland’s firebombing of german cities. Americans frequently compare the september 11th bombings with pearl harbour but all they are doing is skipping over what is still, by far and away, the greatest single massacre of innocent people that has ever happened in ooman history - america’s dropping of atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki. There were days during the american inspired iran-iraq war when thousands of so-called soldiers - many of them teenagers with not the slightest military training - were slaughtered. To the extent that this butchery was reported in the american media many americans greeted the news with glee that so many iranian hostage takers were suffering such disasters. To repeat: no american hostages were killed by the iranians and for americans to gloat over the deaths of iranian teenagers in this american inspired war is only one piece of evidence that americans have a truly, deeply, evil side to them no matter how much they protest their innocence.

The biggest slaughter in the 1991 gulf war occurred when the iraqi army was fleeing towards the iraqi border at the end of the war. This was not a large scale slaughter but it was certainly one of the more dire and revolting slaughters known in the modern world. It was swept under the carpet, both figuratively and metaphorically, thus saving american consumers from having to make the effort to turn their backs on the event.[65] As the convoy of iraqi tanks, personnel carriers, jeeps, lorries, etc raced towards the iraqi border, american apache helicopters hovered in the air 10 miles away from the convoy. They lined up their objectives on their high tech television screens and pushed buttons firing rockets which honed in on their targets with deadly accuracy. Much of the convoy was forced to a halt because the leading vehicles were attacked first so they were left like sitting ducks to be picked off one by one. This was a technological massacre. As soon as the slaughter was over the americans sent in huge Earth moving vehicles which buried the remnants of this convoy under mounds of sand to prevent the news media from reporting on the event. It is not known how many iraqi soldier-conscripts lost their lives - thousands, possibly tens of thousands. These people have never been given a decent and honourable burial because it would be embarrassing to the american military, the american government, and american livestock consumers - it might interfere in the conveyor belt of goods that are disappearing down their fat gobs. America did its best to prevent this massacre from being discovered. Today nobody ever mentions it - as if it never happened. It doesn’t even have a name.[66]

When the attack was reported by the american media, many livestock consumers cheered as if these soldiers deserved their deaths - even though many of them were conscripts, young people, many of them teenagers, who had little option but to go along with saddam’s orders. Americans cheered this triumph of technology, their supremacy over the iraqi army, because it meant their oil supplies were now safe and they would now be able to resume cruising around america in their cars and flying around the world in aeroplanes to indulge their merest whim for entertainment. Americans have been all too content to regard the rest of the world as little else but providers of the resources to keep their consumerist party going. Americans have done more than their fair share of gloating over the vast numbers of people they’ve murdered so their horror at those gloating over the deaths caused by the september 11th bombings is just self deception. The next time americans feel like gloating over their victims they might remember september 11th.

The above massacres are appalling moments of madness in ooman history but they all took place during wartime when reason and compassion become even rarer commodities than they are in peacetime. From this perspective, the september 11th bombings were nowhere near as bad as many historical atrocities. It looks insignificant alongside america’s bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki and the gulf war slaughters. It would not be right, however, to compare the september 11th bombings to an act of war.[67] To reassess these bombings as acts of war would considerably diminish their significance.

In the past there have been some terrible examples of state oppression. Throughout ooman history, governments have used their police and military to slaughter their own citizens - the word ‘draconian’ derives from an ancient ruler over a greek city state who ordered the slaughter of those opposed to his rule. State terrorism in the 20thcentury reached horrendous heights through totalitarianism. On occasions african, arabic, and asian, dictatorships have acted barbarically. One of the most ferocious acts of state terrorism took place in the late 1990s in algeria. An algerian moslem party won the country’s general election but was prevented from taking office by the algerian military under american pressure. The algerian military then embarked upon a reign of terror against the moslems who should have been in power. There were mass arrests, torture, executions, and disappearances. There were horrendous bombings in which hundreds lost their lives. The algerian military blamed the terrorists for these bombings but there is far more reason to believe they were the work of the algerian military and security services. Why should these party activists bomb the people who had just elected them into power? It is believed that over a two year period the algerian army murdered around 30,000 people.[68] However, it is unlikely that they managed to slaughter six thousand in one day - let alone at one stroke. In terms of the scale of the people killed, the september 11th bombings are worse than most examples of state terrorism - even if there are many examples of state terrorism where more people were killed over a longer period of time.

From the perspective of natural disasters, the scale of the deaths in the september 11th bombings was laughably insignificant. Natural disasters have wrought upon the ooman race instant tragedies on an overwhelming scale whether as a result of volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, famines, wildfires, droughts or diseases. However, it does not make much sense to compare the september 11th bombings with such disasters. On the other hand, there is more sense in comparing them with ooman made disasters.

Throughout ooman history, famines have been a natural disaster. Today, however, when the world produces more than enough food for everyone on the planet, famines are ooman made - they exist because of consumers’ refusal to provide starving people with the food they need. Or rather, more to the point, they exist because the rich prefer to give grains to livestock Animals to provide meat rather than giving them to the poor. During the ethiopian famines in the 1980s the government continued to export crops to the european union whilst tens of thousands of people starved - incidentally, these crops were used as feed for european Cattle so that fat-arsed, fat faced, european livestock consumers could stuff their vile fat gobs with even more meat whilst ethiopians were starving to death. Global capitalism is creating political famines around the world.

Global capitalism is also contributing to global burning disasters.[69] In the late 1990s honduras was struck by a hurricane which virtually decimated the entire country. Tens of thousands of people perished. There is good reason to blame capitalism for helping to destabilize the climate and thus increasing the impact of this hurricane. There is even more justification for blaming american imperialism for transforming vast stretches of honduras which grossly amplified the damage caused by the storm. Honduras, like a number of other latin american countries, has been transformed into a wharehouse in which american companies grow food for american consumers and the people living in the country have become entirely superfluous as a result of this transfer of resources. The conversion of honduras’s tropical Forests into american cash crops has made the land highly vulnerable to flooding. There is no question that the damage caused by the hurricane was far worse than would have been the case if most of the country’s Forests were still around. Global capitalism was responsible for exacerbating global burning and american imperialism was responsible for creating flood-prone land. Far more people died in this tragedy than in the september 11th bombings. The americans denied any liability for this tragedy - indeed they even deny that global burning exists or, if it does, that it doesn’t causes any problems. Once again, another example of americans turning their backs on a problem.

A few years ago peru was drenched by massive storms that led to landslides killing tens of thousands of people - one estimate suggested 36,000. This was a colossal disaster. Once again, this storm had a component of anthropogenic global burning. However, it wasn’t american capitalism so much as local people who had transformed the area making landslides more likely. The president of the country was interviewed on channel four news about the disaster and could barely maintain his composure. He appealed for international help. But, it has to be asked, how many of the bereaved were able to tell their stories to the american media? How many americans turned their backs on the suffering of these people?

Finally, there are what could be called perpetual capitalist disasters. When half of the ooman population is being forced to live on less than 3 dollars a week, the smallest incident can lead to individual starvation; the smallest local calamity can lead to what could be called periphery starvation which virtually goes unnoticed in the global media which is usually moved only by mass starvation - although not always. When all the peripheral starvations going on around the world are added up, they probably amount to a colossal number of fatalities. On average, around the world, anywhere between a million and five million people die every day of capitalist induced poverty, disease, exhaustion, or premature old age. The number of people killed in the september 11th bombings was large but it was still a drop in the ocean of deaths around the world due to capitalist exploitation; politically neglected starvation; politically neglected disease; ooman made disasters; and american inspired, state terrorism, “Ken livingstone .. has incensed jews in britain by saying global capitalism has claimed as many victims as world war II, “Every year the international financial system kills more people than world war II, but at least hitler was mad, you know?” .. “It’s an insult to all those murdered and persecuted by adolf hitler,” said john butterfill, a conservative member of parliament.”[70]

The scale of the september 11th bombings is insignificant when compared with political calamities. But, although there are some ways in which such a comparison is valid in others it is not. Oomans around the world are exacerbating global burning but they are not doing so with the intention of slaughtering other oomans. The intentionality of the september 11th bombings makes it a different phenomena from that of ooman made disasters. But, the spectre of the poor haunts the september 11th bombings and no attempt to turn it into an act of pure evil by insane criminals is going airbrush this spectre away. It is as if some of the anger building up about the existence of the world’s poor in a world of plenty was suddenly unleashed and people went berserk because they could no longer stand seeing the misery, the suffering, the humiliation, and the neglect. Huge, bloated livestock Animals, the frightful products of oomans’ genetic engineering, roam the over-industrialized world fed by grains from poor countries that could bring relative prosperity to the poor.

The september 11th bombings were unique because of the scale of the fatalities. But, there is one further consideration which ought to be made. From one perspective, it can be suggested the horror of the september 11th bombings has nothing to do with the numbers of those who lost their lives. Every year, american motorists kill far more americans than were killed on september 11th. Every year, armed americans kill far more americans than were killed in this act of terrorism. And, every year, american gangsters kill far more people than were killed in this act of terrorism. If all american motorists were involved in fatal road accidents on one day of the year; if armed americans killed other americans on just one day of the year; and if gangstas killed their enemies only on one day of the year - these scenarios would create a horrendous spectacle, a form of civil terrorism, that might force americans to face up to the brutality and the carnage of their cornucopian society. But because these slaughters occur piecemeal, day by day, they completely lose their impact. Far more americans are murdered every year by other americans than by terrorists. It seems as if what counts is not the numbers of people slaughtered but the numbers dying in a single event.

The above analysis has sought to compare the september 11th bombings with other examples of mass slaughter to try and determine its significance. It has been suggested that none of these comparisons were very satisfactory because they did not compare like with like. The september 11th bombings were an example of terrorism and it is inadequate comparing them with other types of mass slaughter such those that have taken place during wars or natural/political disasters. So, while it is possible to say that the september 11th bombings were appalling because they were the first example of mass terrorism, it is not possible to say that they were the worst barbarity that oomans have ever inflicted on each other. And no matter how many people were killed during wars or in natural disasters these slaughters do not diminish the significance of the september 11th bombings because, in the category of terrorism, they were appalling.

And yet there is something intellectually bureaucratic about this conclusion. It seems cold-hearted to say that the september 11th slaughters are appalling whereas other, much bigger, more frequent slaughters don’t receive as much moral opprobrium because they are classified as belonging to a different category. From the victims’ point of view what does it matter in the slightest whether they died in a terrorist plane crash or whether they died because of starvation as a result of colonizers stealing their land and exporting all their crops to feed Animals in the rich world. Five thousand people died in a dramatic, and completely unique, fashion in front of tens of millions of people and yet, around the world, a million people may have died quietly and inconspicuously from politically induced starvation, exhaustion, starvation induced disease, starvation induced exhaustion.

Another major issue of concern here is that vast attention is being given to the september 11th bombings whilst ariel sharon’s mass slaughter of palestinians in the sabra and chatilla refugee camps is given far less attention. It is as if the september 11th bombings were a far greater moral crime than sharon’s slaughter. (In fact given the way that nobody talks about the sabra and chatila massacres it is almost as if they were completely insignificant). One of the reasons for this moral judgment, putting aside jewish dominance in the media, is that the slaughters in the sabra and chatila camps took place during a war when slaughters are more frequent. And yet there is a good case for arguing that this slaughter should not be regarded as an act of war but as an act of terrorism because although it took place during war it had no military value because it involved soldiers slaughtering unarmed, defenceless, civilians. The people in the sabra and chatila camps were not palestinian guerrilla fighters, they were old men, women and children. None of them were armed. There was no armed resistance to the the zionist’s proxy terrorists. Once again the zionists were getting other countries/groups to do their dirty work for them. It thus seems entirely legitimate to regard this slaughter as an act of terrorism and thus make possible a direct comparison between it and the september 11th bombings.

When ariel sharon gave permission for his allies, the phalangists, to go into the sabra and chatila camps he knew what they were going to do and he knew the palestinians were unarmed and defenceless. He allowed the phalangists to spend three days, torturing, maiming, mutilating, raping, and butchering, palestinians in these camps whilst his men surrounded the camps to make sure that none of the palestinians escaped their fate, that information about the slaughter would not reach the wider world and that even if palestinian fighters knew what was going on they wouldn't be able to get in and stop what was happening. Ariel sharon's men just pretended they knew nothing about what was going on in the camps even though people did escape and did explain what was happening. The pain and the terror suffered by these palestinians was far greater than that experienced by the passengers on the hijacked planes. The hijackers did not torture, maim, or rape, any of the passengers before they crashed. Perhaps half a dozen passengers at most may have been killed but they were not systematically tortured. The passengers had at most 40 minutes between the time the plane was hijacked and their deaths whereas the palestinians in the refugee camps had to hide themselves as best they could for three days in sheer terror in case they were found, knowing that if they were found there was a possibility they might be tortured horribly before being killed. It is suspected that about 1200 people were murdered in the sabra and chatilla refugee camps and about 5,000 were killed in the september 11th bombings. In terms of sheer numbers, bin laden is a bigger mass murderer than ariel sharon but, in terms of terrorism, pain, fear, ariel sharon is a much bigger terrorist than bin laden. The sabra and chatila slaughters were a worse example of terrorism than the september 11th bombings. It would be a complete mockery of justice to put bin laden on trial without also putting ariel sharon on trial. There is no justice in the war to kill bin laden whilst ariel sharon is being feted around the world as a man who stands resolutely against terrorism. The september 11th bombings were not the world’s worst case of mass terrorism - that goes to ariel sharon’s efforts in the sabra and chatila camps.

3. A Short History of Zionist Occupied Palestine.
		The Rich World and the Poor World: Rich Jews using Palestinians as Cheap labour. At present there are estimated to be some three-five million palestinian refugees around the world. They are stateless people. During the rise of nazism and the second world war, jews used to complain bitterly about being made stateless and now they are inflicting this upon another people. Most palestinian refugees want to return to their homes in palestine but the zionist fascists refuse to allow them to do so. Many of these refugees live in destitution and squalor, “In the (palestinian refugee) camps (in lebanon) 60% live below the poverty line, and there is 40% unemployment. Funding for the refugees has dwindled in recent years, leaving a gap united nations officials call a “collective disaster”. With 70% of palestinians being refugees (i.e. stateless people).”[1] The palestinians want their own state in order to provide legal rights for their own people and to help abolish palestinian poverty. In brutland, there are dozens and dozens of television documentaries about poverty in africa but there are never any about the poverty of palestinians in israel or in palestinian refugee camps around the middle east. This is because of the jewish dominance of the brutish and american media. The West believes only Arab Countries have to abide by United Nations’ Resolutions but not the Zionist State in Palestine. Since the founding of the zionist state in palestine, the fascist zionist government has deported many palestinians from their own homes, from their land and from their own country. Many moved to the lebanon where they could launch attacks on the zionist state in palestine. In 1978 the zionists invaded the lebanon in order to push palestinian guerrilla fighters out of the country and thus even further away from their home. The zionists ignored a united nations’ resolution against the invasion. As robert fisk explains .. “an Israeli invasion of Lebanon designed to drive the PLO out of the country and given the green light by the then US Secretary of State, Alexander Haig which cost the lives of 17,500 Lebanese and Palestinians, almost all of them civilians. That's probably three times the death toll in the World Trade Centre. Yet I do not remember any vigils or memorial services or candle-lighting in America or the West for the innocent dead of Lebanon; I don't recall any stirring speeches about democracy or liberty. In fact, my memory is that the United States spent most of the bloody months of July and August 1982 calling for "restraint".”[2] In 1982 christian militias, under the auspices of the zionist army commanded by ariel sharon, carried out massacres in the palestinian refugee camps at sabra and chatilla, just outside beirut. Some say that about 300 people were killed, others 1200, and others suggest even higher numbers - many of the men were tortured or mutilated before they died, and some women were raped. “Nineteen years ago today, the greatest act of terrorism using Israel's own definition of that much misused word in modern Middle Eastern history began. Does anyone remember the anniversary in the West? How many readers of this article will remember it? I will take a tiny risk and say that no other British newspaper certainly no American newspaper will today recall the fact that on 16 September 1982, Israel's Phalangist militia allies started their three-day orgy of rape and knifing and murder in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila that cost 1,800 lives.”[3] After the zionists succeeded in ousting palestinian fighters from the lebanon they began to withdraw their forces from the country. But, they did not withdraw completely. They continued to occupy a 10 mile wide buffer zone inside the country to protect the zionists’ northern border. From this position the zionist army was able to launch attacks on large areas of the lebanon, “In 1996, israeli guns shelled a united nations base, killing more than 100 lebanese civilians seeking shelter there.”[4] The zionists ignored repeated united nations’ resolutions to end its illegal occupation of southern lebanon - as did the united states and brutland. Even in 1990 when the allies were building a coalition to force iraq to abide by united nations’ resolutions none of the countries in the alliance made any attempt to force the zionist government in palestine to abide by united nations’ resolutions - which is why most arab countries believe that allied countries support laws which apply only to countries they don’t like. Any impartial and fair minded person would have to conclude that the allies were hypocrites, implementing a discriminatory i.e racist policy. In 1999 ehud barak won the zionist general election and sought to conclude the peace agreement with the palestinians that had been on the backburner for years whilst the racist benjamin netanhayu was in office. He decided the price for keeping the zionist army in the lebanon was too high because islamic militants were killing many zionist soldiers. He pulled the zionist army out of the country, “Clearly, hezbollah had made the cost to israel of remaining in lebanon - where, unofficially, at least 1,500 of its men have died - too great to bear.”[5] Ariel sharon, the person who has to take responsibility for the sabra and chatilla mass murders, was none too pleased at the withdrawal which .. “was the first forced retreat of the israeli army from arab soil in 52 years.”[6] Militarily, however, the zionist state in palestine has little to fear from its arab neighbours. Mark dowdney points out that, “Israel retains its nuclear weapons, a vast army and air force capable of defeating any of its arab adversaries.”[7] - the united states and brutland continue to insist that the zionist state does not possess such weapons which is why it punished india and pakistan for having nuclear weapons but not the zionist state.

All publications are copyrighted mundi club © You are welcome to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy.	We welcome additional information, comments, or criticisms. Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/

3. A Short History of Zionist Occupied Palestine.

4. The Global Jewish Conspiracy of Silence.

5. Global Jewish Propaganda.

6. Terrorism as a Mass Spectacle.