In this work, the ‘global’ aspect of the three types of zionist propaganda is manifest through the fact that zionist propaganda emanates from the zionist state and is then relayed to other countries, particularly america and brutland, not merely by zionists’ representatives in these countries but by pro-semitic supporters, especially those zionists owning media outlets, and occasionally by non-jews too gullible to understand the origin and purpose of the propaganda they are regurgitating.

It became obvious that the brutish media/politicians would cover up ariel bin sharon’s war crimes after 2001 when he was elected prime minister in a racist election amongst zionists. After the p*ny bombings, it became even more blatantly obvious that brutish media/politicians were covering up his war crimes because whilst they continually denounced osama bin laden’s war crimes they never mentioned sharon’s. Even worse, they were constantly inviting him to appear in the media so that he could make himself look good by demanding that osama bin laden should be arrested for uhhhmmm er er ... war crimes - as if the media was doing its best to pretend he was not a mass murderer.

Media/politicians’ refusal to mention that ariel bin sharon is a mass murderer is a major indication as to the existence of the zionists’ global conspiracy of silence. The allies claimed they were waging war against terrorists and that it was a question of justice arresting bin laden for his terroristic activities - whilst, at the same time, not merely ignoring ariel bin sharon’s terrorism but celebrating his heroic action for sending in the zionist military against unarmed palestinian civilians.

To moslem public opinion, this discrimination between two mass murderers blatantly reveals the allies’ anti-moslem racism. To any independent, impartial person around the world, the allies looked like racist bigots concerned only with punishing moslem terrorists whilst applauding and rewarding zionist terrorists. The more the allies talked about bringing bin laden to justice whilst remaining silent about ariel bin sharon, the more racist they appeared. No amount of reasoned arguments by sharon-loving western politicians in the sharon-loving western media would ever convince moslems, or independently minded people, that what the allies were doing, by focusing on bin laden and ignoring ariel bin sharon, was anything other than perpetuating racism and global injustices. The west might believe it is not merely the richest, and most powerful, part of the world but the most just, and most enlightened, but the rest of the world looks on it as being corrupt and mired in racism. No matter how much work western countries do to rid themselves of the scourge of racism in their own countries their support for zionist racists casts a massive cloud of doubt over everything they do.

In brutland, zionists have helped to ensure that consumer livestock are ignorant about the history of the middle east and thus have not the slightest appreciation that the zionist government established itself in palestine through the use of violence. Kenneth clarke, secretary of state for education, banned the teaching of contemporary middle east history from the national curriculum. After 1988 children would be taught about events in the middle east only up to 1967. Consumer livestock don’t understand that zionists are colonizers who invaded palestine and, ever since, have been systematically stealing palestinian land and are thus, by definition, terrorists. It has to be speculated though that, in all probability, they don’t want to understand but this does not reduce politicians/medias’ responsibilities for deliberately perpetuating this ignorance. As greg philo explained, “If you don't understand the Middle East crisis it might be because you are watching it on TV news. This scores high on images of fighting, violence and drama, but low on explanation. But the research also showed that many people had little understanding of the reasons for the conflict and its origins. It was apparent that this lack of understanding (and indeed misunderstanding) was compounded by the news reports. Explanations were rarely given on the news and when they were, journalists often spoke obliquely, almost in a form of shorthand. ”[2] Itn refused to mention the historical context of current events in the middle east on the grounds that it was not their job to teach history! - nor apparently justice. To the extent that consumer livestock think about the middle east, they seem to believe that zionists would be able to live peacefully with palestinians if it wasn’t for those pesky palestinian terrorists who, inexplicably, keep resorting to the use of terrorism against entirely innocent and blameless zionists. They either don’t understand, or don’t want to understand, or don’t have the time to understand, that zionists have stolen, and are continuing to steal, land from palestinian people who want it back.

So effective has been the media’s refusal to discuss zionist state terrorism that it has created the most enormous chasm between those living in the rich world supporting the zionists and those living in the poor world supporting moslems. Everytime a political leader in the rich world mentioned the word ‘terrorist’, livestock consumers with their complete lack of historical knowledge, immediately thought of islamic fundamentalists whilst in third world countries the word made the poor think of zionists’ colonization of palestine. Islamic people scream at western consumer livestock ‘What about zionist terrorism?’ ‘What about zionist racism?’ but the livestock are too preoccupied with consumerist spectacles to be bothered about what they’re saying.

The media refuses to discuss the fact that it is dominated by jews even though it is a commonly appreciated fact that hollywood is dominated by jewish people. But there is a considerable jewish presence in virtually all parts of the media, not merely films, but television, cable, and radio. Many films/tv series/tv programmes are financed, produced, and directed, by jews - as are many media superstars.[3]

In the past, hollywood’s jewish actors tended to have a more progressive political ethos than the rest of the american public. From the 1970s until the turn of the millennium, progressive jews made considerable efforts to incorporate non-jews into the industry. This led to increasing numbers of black and some latino/chinese/oriental, actors in films/tv. This was a welcome development. Unfortunately, in the midst of left-wing celebrations about the increasingly multi-cultural nature of the media, virtually no commentator noticed, or was willing to mention, that there was still one group of people who were being excluded from the integrationist melting pot. It seems too much of a coincidence that in a jewish dominated industry, at a time when zionists in palestine were increasingly persecuting palestinians, that very few people from arab/islamic countries were being included in the media.[4]

In brutland one of the most blatant examples of the exclusion of arab/moslem people from the mainstream media was evident in the jewish dominated advertising world. After the 1997 general election the labour government made strenuous efforts to force the police to find stephen lawrence’s killers and to eradicate institutionalized racism. This sent out a signal to all other brutish institutions to start cleaning up their act. The jewish dominated advertising world suddenly started featuring more people from minority groups in television commercials. But then something extraordinary happened. The most prominent beneficiary of the labour government’s social edict was the appearance of large numbers of black males (many of them appearing in their shorts) - but the number of arab/moslem males/females was virtually non-existent. Quite simply, the jews in the advertising world did not want arab-moslems appearing in their adverts.[5] In other words, zionists in the brutish media were peddling anti-moslem propaganda in brutland even during the time when peace negotiations were going on in palestine.

Politically correct, anti-racists believe that people’s origins/colour should be of no significance whatsoever - whether in the media or anywhere else. This is a perfectly acceptable principle. Unfortunately, this anti-racist stance is increasingly being corrupted so that it serves the interests of a particular race at the expense of another race. What is of concern in this work is that zionists have so much influence in the american/brutish media, they’ve been able to introduce and perpetuate a racist division between non islamic, and islamic, peoples. Even worse, they’ve been able to do this without anyone protesting about it. It is remarkable how the left have said nothing about zionists’ perpetuation of anti-moslem racism. This is either because they believe that criticizing zionist racists would be racist or that because they believe that jews are a special people who have to be treated in a different way from everyone else. The left seems to believe that zionists are so special they can be permitted to be racist - such a belief resting on sentimentalism towards poor, defenceless jews who, sixty years after the second world war still haven’t got over the tragedy.

The zionists had to punish straw for breaking this tenet of the zionists’ global conspiracy of silence, so the planned meeting between ariel bin sharon, the terrorist mass murderer, and jack straw, the fighter against terrorism, was cancelled. The meeting went ahead only after the brutish prime minister contacted the zionist mass murderer and agreed not only to enforce zionists’ global conspiracy of silence amongst his cabinet colleagues but to ensure that straw would denounce palestinians as terrorists rather than praise their truly heroic fight for freedom, “The row began when mr straw said anger over the plight of the palestinians was helping to breed terror. He also referred to Palestine, a term israel does not recognize. Downing street said “no offence was intended” by mr straw’s remarks. The prime minister’s spokesman said the government will go back to referring to the “Palestinian controlled authorities” instead of palestine. Mr straw said, “I stand very firmly against the terrorism which the israeli people have suffered.””[8] Poor old straw, a long time anti-racist leftie like many other labour party members, quickly found himself bound by zionist shackles, or is it shekels? Zionists have now succeeded in curbing left wing protests about zionist racism in palestine and out of the window goes all pretence that the left are concerned about justice, compassion, and equal rights.

The zionists’ global conspiracy of silence is imposed not merely upon brutish, but upon american, politicians, “(Straw) dares to say the “P” word - palestine - which washington fight shy of.”[9]

The american jewish lobby, the zionists in the american government, the zionists in congress, and the zionists’ in the american media, perceived the p*ny bombings as an attack on jewish interests and wanted the american government to attack the terrorists responsible - by which they meant anti-zionist terrorists rather than the zionists’ terrorist state in palestine which was the ultimate cause of the attack. The allies’ propaganda was in perfect accord with the zionists’ global conspiracy of silence - it turned the ownership of the twin towers and zionist terrorism into unmentionables or invisibles.

In brutland, television companies constantly invite specific zionist leaders for interviews about events in palestine. The zionists present themselves as people whose values and appearances are no different from those in the west. The media does not invite all members of the zionist government for interviews because it knows that many of them would start expressing views which the brutish public would find repugnant.

In effect, the zionists in the brutish media are doing their bit for their crypto-nazi zionist government by refusing to supply the brutish public with information about the extreme, right wing, religious bigots in ariel bin sharon’s government or the crypto-nazi zionist members of the knesset (parliament). It must have been something of a shock for the brutish public to discover the zionist government had in its ranks, reehvam ze’evi, a crypto-nazi zionist who was honoured with national mourning after his death.

The mundi club appreciates that jewishness has become a taboo topic over the last couple of decades especially during the time when crypto-nazi zionists such as menachem begin, yitzak shamir, benjamin netanhayu, and ariel bin sharon, were deporting palestinians from their own country and building vast numbers of illegal zionist settlements but, we believe that, just like incest, if we don’t get the problem into the open then it isn’t going to be solved.

That the zionists’ global conspiracy of silence is succeeding in making various words, and phrases, taboo adds to the notion that the jews are a special people. By surrounding themselves with global taboos, the zionists are turning jews into a sacred people.

Rubin’s treatment by the brutish media was remarkable. In his appearance on brutish television programmes, he was always introduced as an american - his jewishness was never mentioned - as if this was his own personal business which had no bearing on any of his opinions. He provides a good example of what could be called kosher coyness. He reciprocated by reinforcing the impression that he was an ordinary all-american guy and that, as such, he was trying to be even-handed between the zionists and the palestinians over the middle east conflict. He created the impression that it was reason and sound political judgment which was driving him to support the zionist state whereas it is blatantly obvious that, as a jew, he was going to favour the zionists’ apartheid regime in palestine. The fact that the brutish media never mentioned he was a jew and a zionist, and pretended that he was just a high ranking american politician, turned out to be an extremely useful political asset for the promotion of global zionist propaganda. Firstly, it meant that in serious political debates on brutish tv he could be used to give the zionists’ point of view without the media having to continually invite representatives of the zionist government - after all most zionist politicians in palestine were much too busy oppressing palestinians to be able to take time off for television debates. Secondly, the tactic also had the benefit of preventing the brutish public from getting suspicious of seeing an endless stream of zionist government officials on television telling them what to think. Thirdly, however, and by far the most important benefit, was that it absolved the media from interviewing the extremist members of ariel bin sharon’s government. This is a crucial element of the zionist conspiracy of silence because once the brutish public hears the views of the appalling bigots in ariel bin sharon’s government they would almost invariably switch their allegiance to the palestinians. Fourthly, because rubin is presented as an independent american expert on the middle east, it was possible to get away with having him on endless numbers of television debates without accusations that it was giving too much air time to zionists. A fifth advantage was that the media didn’t have to invite representatives of the palestinian people to provide a balance with what was in effect, an unpaid member of the zionist government in palestine. The last thing that jewish producers producing brutish news television programmes want is having people they regard as palestinian terrorists in their studio discussions. Sixthly, rubin could present the zionists’ point of view, as if it was the common opinion of the american government/people, without it being challenged by pesky palestinians demanding their land back.

Mark ellis, in the mirror, tried to uphold the zionist conspiracy of silence by quoting a guard suggesting that kidnappers had forced him to lie that he was a jew, “Kidnapped american reporter daniel pearl’s last moments were videotaped by muslim extremists as he was beheaded. A pakistani official said, “I have been told the last words uttered by pearl in the videotape were, ‘Yes i am a jew and my mother is a jew.’ “Maybe he was forced by his kidnappers to say these words.”[22] Ellis confirmed pearl was a jew only in his article published a few days later - february 26th 2002.

A few weeks after his death, the bbc started to refer to pearl simply as the wall street journalist cleverly implying that he was an american citizen rather than a jew and a zionist without having to lie about the matter.[23]

These facts expose compose zionists’ global conspiracy of silence. The brutish media never challenges successive zionist governments’ for inflicting gross injustices on palestinians let alone blames them for engaging in state terrorism. It is a remarkable contrast that for decades the brutish media helped to condemn the racism of the south african government and yet it has done virtually nothing about the zionists’ oppression of palestinians. According to phyllis bennis, “For the overwhelming majority of the world's population, South Africa was always considered a pariah state. But Israel is not in that position. Israel is given a pass, if you will, on the question of racism.”[26] Virtually all of the english speaking media is involved in this zionist global conspiracy of silence. Zionists have managed to acquire from the rest of the world, but especially the anti-racist political correct brigade in brutland and america, a special dispensation to be racists. That extreme right wing christian fundamentalists should support the zionists is not surprising, but it is surprising that new labour are just as bad.

The irony of the zionists’ global conspiracy of silence is that after the reoccupation of palestine, jews have imposed silence on themselves, “Another friend, a liberal rabbi, was about to set off on a regular visit to Israel. She contrasted the usual furious public arguments which she expected to find there to the behind-the-hand mutterings of New Yorkers. "Over here Sharon and Netanyahu have managed to turn the issue of terrorism, which was provoked by Israeli behaviour on the West Bank, into an existential question of the survival of the Israeli state. Debate becomes disloyalty," she complained.

The majority of the people pushed into concentration and extermination camps may have been jews but the fact is that the jews were just a minority of those killed by the nazis and an even tinier minority of those killed during the second world. The nazis slaughtered not only jews but gypsies, communists, gays, disabled people, and even seven day adventists, etc. The people who suffered the most during the second world were the russians. They bore the brunt of both stalinist and nazi slaughters.

Zionists’ propaganda about the jewish holocaust is designed to ensure that whenever the nazis/second world war are mentioned in the media, people automatically think about the suffering and slaughter of jewish people rather than the suffering and slaughter of the millions of other victims of nazi and stalinist totalitarianism.[27] Zionists also pump out the nonsense that the sole reason for the existence of the third reich was to exterminate jews. The goal of the third reich was world domination - it wasn’t the extermination of jews. The extermination of jews was just a minor affair on germans’ road to world domination.

The so-called jewish holocaust is a vile myth because it turns the deaths of tens of millions of non-jews into a matter of insignificance. In other words, it turns such people into non-people. Zionist propaganda promotes the idea of a completely fictious, phoney, event called the jewish holocaust.

In brutland the zionist lobby is so powerful it has been able to foist on the country the obscenity of a jewish holocaust day - presumably when everyone in the country is supposed to forget about the horrors of totalitarianism, the horrors of the second world war, perhaps even forget about all the other disasters that have happened around the world, and commiserate solely with jews. There’s no russian holocaust day for the vastly larger number of russians who were slaughtered during stalin’s reign of terror and during hitler’s invasion of russia. There’s no capitalist day when everyone might remember those who die as a result of twin tower capitalist exploitation - especially so given jews’ role on promoting capitalism. The jewish holocaust is a sickeningly phoney event which has more to do with zionists’ goal of global domination than it has to do with commemorating the dead. Zionists’ distortions about themselves, the nazis, and the second world war, is just as bad as their distortion of the evil of adolf eichmann.

The mc has suffered a similar experience. It made what it believed to be strong but fair criticisms of the zionist state only to find someone spreading rumours that it was a dangerous nazi organization that needed to be stopped. It is suspected that her allegations led to the mc being removed from a popular newsgroup until the people managing the newsgroup investigated the issue and made the blatantly obvious discovery that the mc wasn’t a nazi organization. When the mc was reinstated she welcomed our return with the accusation that i’d publically stated that i was a nazi and that this was the reason i’d been chucked off the group. She also sent emails stating, in large bold capital letters, that i was a nazi bastard and that she was going to track me down - wasn’t this what the nazis did to the jews during the second world war? Then presumably she’d get the local member of the zionists’ international conspiracy to bulldoze my house because i was suddenly beginning to realize what was going on.

In the 1960s and 1970s left wing, radical, politicians would talk openly about zionist oppression of palestinians but today their insipid successors, the politically correct, will not do so for fear of being branded anti-semitic or racist. This is a clear indication of the speed with which the zionists have completed the zionization of american/brutish governments over the last three decades.

The american and brutish media are forced to follow their governments’ line and thus all news programmes are based on the preposterous assumption that the zionist state in palestine is a liberal democracy. So, the political protocols of maintaining good relationships between states have been transformed by the media into the wholesale fiction that the zionist state is just another liberal democracy like those in europe.

The problem for mcbush and mcblair in defining the zionist state in palestine as a legitimate liberal democracy is that this means that palestinians fighting for their own state are automatically cast as terrorists - which is a little odd since they are freedom fighters trying to regain their own land and to obtain their national rights which the racists in the zionist government deny them.

The jewish dominated brutish media cultivates this illusion that palestine is in europe in a couple of ways. Firstly, in a positive way by involving the zionist state in european cultural events such as, for example, the european song contest and european football competitions. Secondly, in a negative way by refusing to cover palestine’s domestic politics. The reason for this is transparent - brutish people would then discover that, despite their common judaeo-christian origins, they have nothing in common culturally with the religious extremists running the zionist state. Brutish people would be horrified by zionists’ religious zealotry and ideology. They’d be appalled to discover that the knesset is like a parliament full of ian paisely’s. Brutish people are tolerant of hassidic jews living in north london - despite their appallingly high birth rate of 8 children per family - many of whom end up on illegal settlements in zionist occupied palestine.[35] This is primarily because north london jews cannot force their religious views on brutish people but, in palestine, extreme right wing religious parties, which often hold the balance of power in the knesset, are always trying to impose religious laws on secular jews - sometimes using violence to do so. The assassination of rehavam ze’evi, the zionist’s minister for tourism, was a master stroke of propaganda by palestinian freedom fighters since, for the first time on brutish television, it became transparent that one of ariel sharon’s closest friends was a crypto-nazi.

Zionist fundamentalism is the mirror image of moslem fundamentalism. The taliban’s extreme renunciation of many worldly activities is little different from the attitudes held by many zionist fundamentalists. It is imperative for zionists to make themselves seem like a friendly country similar to those in europe but this can be achieved only by preventing european people from discovering the appalling bigotry of zionist fundamentalism.

This propaganda against moslems was of such a frightfully extreme nature that all it did was reveal the gross barbarity of those promoting it. And indeed, once it became apparent that this extremist propaganda was becoming counter-productive i.e. mcbush’s anger with sharon for likening him to neville chamberlain, it was changed to a more moderate version.[37] But ariel bin sharon continued to act in accordance with this extremist propaganda and, by provoking palestinians into increasing numbers of suicide bombings, managed to convince extreme, right wing, american christian fundamentalists in the mcbush administration that he’d been right after all.

Doubtlessly there are palestinians and moslems who hold extreme views but it is easy to appreciate that they have been driven to this position by decades of zionists’ vile persecution. Zionists have murdered tens of thousands of palestinians. They have rendered millions of palestinians homeless, propertyless, and stateless. They are continually stealing palestinian land and bulldozing their homes as if they are intent on colonizing their land rather than negotiating for its return. Many zionist fundamentalists such as ariel bin sharon would love to expel all palestinians from their own country if only world opinion would tolerate such a policy.