1. A Short History of Zionist Occupied Palestine. |
||
|
Once again, brutland’s imperialist past is
ultimately to blame for the war between palestinians and zionists. After
the first world war, the brutish took control of palestine. At that time
there were only a few jews living in the area most of whom were religious
jews opposed to zionism.[4] During the inter-war years, the brutish allowed
jews to emigrate to palestine and this immigration increased significantly
during the second world war. It has been estimated that, “At the end of
1946, 1,269,000 arabs and 608,000 jews resided within the borders of mandate
palestine. Jews had acquired by purchase six to eight per cent of the
total land area of palestine, amounting to about 20% of the arable land.”[5] Victoria Brittain concurs, “When israel was established
in 1948 jews controlled 7-8% of the land ..”[6]
After the war was over, the zionists armed themselves and started
taking over more and more land in palestine. Having brought about this
conflict between the jews and the palestinians the brutish promptly left.
Shortly afterwards the zionists founded the jewish state, “On may 15th
1948, the british evacuated palestine and zionist leaders proclaimed the
state of israel.”[7]
The united nations intervened in the conflict
between the palestinians and the zionists and agreed to recognize the
creation of a zionist state, “When the un partitioned palestine in 1947,
in breach of its own charter, giving 55% of the land to 45% of the population
.. 45% allocated to the arabs.”[8] In other words, the united nations designated
55% of the land to the zionists who had only 45% of the population and
owned only 7-8% of the land. “By the spring of 1948, the zionist forces
had secured control over most of the territory allotted to the jewish
state in the un plan.”[9] The zionists
then started murdering and deporting palestinians from the land that the
united nations had illegally taken from them and given to the zionists.
The united nations basically gave the zionist state permission to expropriate,
deport, and massacre, large numbers of palestinians from their own land.
Ever since the formation of the zionist state, zionists have been pursuing
a lebensraum policy against the indigenous palestinians, “As a consequence
of the fighting in palestine/israel between 1947 and 1949, over 700,000
palestinian arabs became refugees. There are several well-documented cases
of mass expulsions during and after the military operations of 1948-1949
and the massacres and atrocities that led to large scale arab flight.
The best known instance of mass expulsion is that of the 50,000 arabs
of the towns of lydda and ramle.”[10]
The zionists were not content with the 55% of the land it had
been granted by the united nations. Mark elf stated, “When the un partitioned
palestine in 1947, in breach of its own charter, giving 55% of the land
to 45% of the population, the zionists began attacking and seizing parts
of the 45% allocated to the arabs.”[11] They continued
their lebensraum policies by annexing land that had been designated
for palestinians and then driving the palestinians off their own land.
Arab countries around palestine were none too interested
in the palestinians but they didn’t like the idea of a zionist state so
they tried to drive out the zionists, “Shortly after, in May 1948, a major
war broke out between Israel and its Arab neighbours, which occasioned
more people to flee. Many of the refugees moved to Gaza (which came under
the control of Egypt) and to the West Bank of the Jordan river (under
Jordanian control).”[12] Mark elf stated, “When britain left palestine in 1948, the arab
states mobilized to stop israel from seizing any more of palestine than
they had been allocated by the united nations and to prevent the ethnic
cleansing of palestine’s arabs. Israel emerged with 78% of palestine,
and 800,000 palestinians became refugees.”[13]
Over the next few decades, there were further major wars
between the zionists and arabs which enabled the zionists to continue
their lebensraum policies occupying more palestinian land and forcing
more palestinians to flee. According to greg philo, “In 1967 Israel fought
a further war with its Arab neighbours and in the process occupied Gaza
and the West Bank, thus bringing the Palestinian refugees under its military
control. East Jerusalem, which has great religious and cultural significance
for both Israelis and Palestinians, was also occupied (taken from Jordan).
These military occupations were bitterly resisted by the Palestinians,
not least because Israel built "settlements" all across the
militarily occupied territories. ”[14] According to phyllis bennis, “Over 80 percent of the land within
Israel that was once owned by Palestinians has been confiscated.”[15]
At the end of the second world war the zionists owned 7-8%
of palestine. By the end of the 1940s they had obtained, through military
force, another 70% of the land and had used appalling levels of state
terrorism to clear palestinians off their own land. Victoria brittain
has pointed out that, “When israel was established in 1948 jews controlled
7-8% of the land .. Today the situation is reversed with 93% of the land
held by israeli jews.”[16]
Ever since the founding of the zionist state, the zionists
have endeavoured to gain military control over the whole of palestine
and have pursued a ruthless lebensraum policy to expropriate land
from palestinians and drive them out of the country or into refugee camps/ghettoes.
This policy has continued unabated even over the last decade or so when
the zionists were supposed to be abiding by the oslo peace accord, “Israel
has secretly grabbed 42% of palestinian land in the west bank for illegal
settlement activity, according to a new report. Although built up jewish
settlements cover only 1.7% of the west bank, the israeli authorities
have used a variety of ruses since they occupied the territory in 1967
to assign vast amounts of extra land to settlers. Full details of the
seizures have been made public for the first time by the israeli human
rights organization b’tselem. In theory the documentary evidence has always
been open for public inspedction but b’tselem fought a year-long legal
battle to get it released. “The establishment of settlements on the west
bank violates international humanitarian law, “ the report says. It adds
that the settlements - which house 380,000 jews - also lead to infringements
of palestinians’ human rights, for example by restricting their freedom
of movement and property rights. The main device used by israel to seize
palestinian land has been to declare it “state land” under a 19thc ottoman
law, the report says. “In many cases, palestinian residents were unaware
that their land was registered in the name of the state, and by the time
they discovered this fact, it was too late to appeal.” As a result of
the settlements, israel is operating a regime with two separate legal
systems in the west bank, based on racial discrimination.”[17]
Desmond Tutu described his experience of palestinians who continue
to live in palestine after crypto-nazi zionists had stolen their land,
“I have experienced Palestinians pointing to what were their homes, now
occupied by Jewish Israelis. I was walking with Canon Naim Ateek (the
head of the Sabeel Ecumenical Centre) in Jerusalem. He pointed and said:
"Our home was over there. We were driven out of our home; it is now
occupied by Israeli Jews."”[18]
In terms of contemporary political arguments, the zionists
have always initiated violence against the palestinians in order to create the
zionist state and to continue its remorseless expansion. For the zionists it
has never been sufficient to gain military control over palestinian areas, they
have always followed this up by expropriating palestinian land and deporting
palestinians in order to colonize the land. Since the formation of the zionist
state, zionists have never been interested in negotiating a peace agreement
with the palestinians about a palestinian state because their goal has been
the colonization of all palestine.
The zionists’ use of violence in founding the zionist
state, expropriating palestinian land, and colonizing palestine, has created
about three quarters of a million refugees, “However, by means of the
1947-48 war, Israel took over even greater expanses of land and forcibly
expelled about 750,000 Palestinians. This travesty was the basis for the
official founding of the Israeli state in 1948.”[19] The
number of palestinian refugees increased everytime the zionist state gained
military control over more palestinian land. Soon after the zionists took
military control of an area, they illegally implemented policies to expropriate
the palestinians living on that land.
At present there are estimated to be between three and five
million palestinian refugees around the world i.e. people who have been driven
from their homes, their land, and, in many cases, their own country by the racist
zionist state. It is ironic, then, that the ending of the jewish diaspora was
responsible for triggering the palestinian diaspora. Millions of stateless jewish
refugees were transformed into millions of stateless palestinian refugees.
Most palestinian refugees are stateless people. During the
nazis’ attempted extermination of european jews in the second world war, jews
used to complain bitterly about being made stateless and yet, before the end
of the decade, they were inflicting the same treatment on another people.
Some palestinians are not stateless because they live within
the borders of the zionist state which recognizes them as citizens of
israel, “Inside what is called the "Green Line"--the unofficial
borders of Israel before the 1967 war - there are still about one million
Palestinians, just under 20 percent of the total Israeli population. Most
Palestinians are Muslim, some are Christian.”[20]
Zionist racists have forced palestinians to
become refugees which has meant living in destitution and squalor, “Funding
for the refugees has dwindled in recent years, leaving a gap united nations
officials call a “collective disaster”. With 70% of palestinians being
refugees (i.e. stateless people).”[21] Alexander
stockport has stated, “The palestinians have been living under seige,
in poverty, for 50 years and they are desperate. They exist either in
squalid refugee camps or in a jigsaw of controlled bits of desert scrubland
which the occupying israelis have decided to return to them. Their land
is criss crossed by the israeli military, they have to queue for hours
at checkpoints and they are liable to be attacked by shellfire. Seventy
per cent are unemployed and they suffer water shortages.”[22] Victoria brittain stated, “In the camps 60%
live below the poverty line, and there is 40% unemployment.”[23]
Kevin toolis provided a rare glimpse into life in the janin
and nablus refugee camps after sharon had launched a temporary invasion
in march 2002, “The israeli army strafed and bombed their way through
one of the most wretched places on earth, hunting an invisible, long departed
enemy. Inevitably in the squalid, densely-populated camps it was mainly
the poor and the innocent who died. As anyone who has been to a palestinian
refugee camp can testify, the camps are places of abject misery. For the
last 50 years they have lived in almost biblical style bondage, captives
of their enemies, and crowded into the waste tips of history. If you speak
to 14 year olds, who have known no other world than the open sewers of
a refugee camp .. There are no jobs, no hope and no escape from what the
palestinians call their nakba - “catastrophe”.”[24]
It is rare indeed for the media to mention zionist-induced,
palestinian poverty because zionists in the brutish/american medias have successfully
repressed such information. In brutland, there are dozens and dozens of television
documentaries about poverty in africa but there are never any about the poverty
of palestinians in palestine or in palestinian refugee camps around the middle
east. This is because of the zionist dominance of the brutish media. A similar
point could be made about the american media.
There are many similarities between the zionist state
in palestine and the nazi state in germany in the 1930s.
1.5.1: The Promotion of Lebensraum.
Firstly, ever since its formation the crypto-nazi
zionist state has pursued a lebensraum policy to drive
all palestinians out of palestine.
1.5.2: Racist Immigration Policies.
Secondly, the crypto-nazi zionist state has adopted
racist immigration policies preventing palestinian refugees from returning to
their homes whilst, at the same time, demanding that diaspora jews return to
palestine. Most palestinian refugees living outside palestine want to return
to their homes and their land in palestine. However, the crypto-nazi zionist
state’s racist anti-immigration policies prevent them from doing so. These immigration
policies allow any jew around the world to move to palestine even if they have
never been to palestine before but they prevent palestinians from moving back
to their own country let alone their own homes. In other words, the zionist
state allows only jews to immigrate not palestinians.
None of the so-called peace processes that zionists and
successive american administrations, with the complicity of successive
brutish governments, have forced upon palestinians allow palestinian refugees
to return to their homes. What this has meant is that the zionists, and
their american/brutish government muppets, have been forcing yasser arafat
into renouncing his own people for the sake of a meaningless peace agreement.
Victoria brittain has stated .. “the issue that was at the core of the
“peace process” begun in oslo will again be avoided. It is the 5 million
refugees whose right to return to their homes in palestine and to be compensated
for loss and property damage was recognized by un resolution 194 of december
1948. This resolution has been reaffirmed more than 100 times but never
implemented. In 1994, for the first time, the u.s. voted against it in
the general assembly .. All beirut governments since 1948 have refused
to grant palestinians citizenship or integrate them into the local economy.
Some 75,000 palestinians have in fact left (the lebanon) in the last ten
years. In the camps 60% live below the poverty line, and there is 40%
unemployment. In 1948, 1967 and 1982 waves of ethnic cleansing (in israel)
virtually destroyed palestinian society. The refugee issue was obfuscated
by oslo. Those pushed out in 1948 when the state of israel was created
are excluded; only refugees from the 1967 war are to be considered. (The
plo is also being pushed in the direction of accepting this agreement).
This has brought refugees to the centre of the growing revolt against
the peace process. When israel was established in 1948 jews controlled
7-8% of the land .. Today the situation is reversed with 93% of the land
held by israeli jews. The land was seized from palestinians now living
outside israel and from 230,000 palestinian israeli citizens still inside.
The u.s. supports the return of stolen property to its rightful owners
by backing the efforts of the jewish restitution organization. No comparable
pressure group exists to press for palestinians ..”[25]
The zionists, and their american and brutish
allies, have disowned palestinian refugees and their rights to their property
in palestine and they want yasser arafat to do the same. When he refuses to
do so they call him a terrorist. It is the zionists, americans, and the brutish,
who are the terrorists not the palestinians. The palestinians want their own
state in order to provide legal rights for their own people around the world
and to abolish palestinian poverty.
1.5.3: The Racist nature of the Zionist State: Palestinians
given Second Class Rights.
Phyllis bennis, a jew, exposes the zionist state’s
creation of a segregated racist state, “From 1948 to 1966, the Palestinians
within Israel lived under explicit military rule. They were considered
a military threat to the Israeli state, and they were ruled under a completely
different set of laws than the Jewish population.”[26] What replaced military rule wasn’t much better,
“After 1966, military rule was lifted, but it was replaced by a set of
Jim Crow-like laws designed to discriminate against Arabs in Israel. According
to Adalah, an Arab rights organization, today there are at least 20 laws
that specifically provide unequal rights and obligations based on what
the Israelis call nationality, which in Israel is defined on the basis
of religion. Israelis must carry a card which identifies them as either
a Jew, a Muslim, or a Christian. All non-Jews are second class citizens.
The Israeli Supreme Court has dismissed virtually all cases which dealt
with equal rights for Arab citizens.”[27]
1.5.4: The Racist nature of the Zionist State: Palestinians
not allowed to own Jewish Land.
“Over 80 percent of the land within Israel that was
once owned by Palestinians has been confiscated. All told, 93 percent
of Israel's land can only be leased or owned by Jews or Jewish agencies.”[28]
1.5.5: The Racist nature of the Zionist State: Palestinians
given Second Treatment.
Joel beinin & lisa hajjar argue, “All of israel’s
governments have discriminated against the arab population by allocating
far fewer resources for education, health care, public works, municipal
government and economic development to the arab sector.”[29]
1.5.6: The Zionist State is for Jews Only.
The root of the problem is that the jewish
state is based upon racist principles. According to phyllis bennis, “Unlike
any other country in the world, Israel does not define itself as a state
of its residents, or even a state of its citizens, but as a state of all
the Jews in the world. Jews from anywhere in the world, like me, can travel
to Israel, declare citizenship, and be granted all the privileges of being
Jewish that are denied to Palestinians who have lived in the area for
hundreds of years.”[30]
Palestinians, and any other ethnic group, can never be anything more than
a second class citizen in the zionist state. Joel beinin & lisa hajjar
point out that, “In 1948, only about 150,000 palestinian arabs remained
in the area that became the state of israel. They were granted israeli
citizenship and the right to vote. But in many respects they were, and
remain, second class citizens since israel defines itself as the state
of the jewish people and palestinians are non-jews.”[31]
1.5.7: A Racially Pure Jewish Society.
When the zionists invaded palestine and started annexing
palestinian land they had a choice - drive all the palestinians off the land
and replace them with zionist settlers or try and integrate palestinians and
zionists into a multi-cultural, multi-faith, society. The zionists have never
even considered attempting to create a multi-cultural society like those in
the western world. The zionists have always aimed to create a racially pure
zionist state free of all palestinians. Over the last few decades, in brutland and in
europe, significant efforts have been made to transform homogenous, nation-states
into multi-cultural, multi-faith, societies by integrating immigrants
into their social and political systems. The essence of a multi-cultural
society is one based on integration in which people of all cultures have
the same opportunities to health, education, a home, a job, the vote,
and to participate in politics. Anti-racism is based on an integrationist
ethic. It is opposed to segregation.[32] Whatever
the differences there are between the over-industrialized countries as
regards their commitment to multi-culturalism, they all encourage immigrants
to get a job, own their own home, obey the law, and take part in political
elections. They protect immigrants from unfair treatment with various
anti-discrimination laws. The efforts that have been made to integrate
immigrants may not always have been fulsome or comprehensive, and are
still far from complete, but if political parties promoted policies which
were segregationist e.g. forcing people to carry cards which identified
them racially, preventing certain categories of people from owning land,
or getting a job or voting, then those parties would rightly be denounced
as racist. The zionist state thus stands in sharp contrast
to what is happening in the over-industrialized world. It vigorously applies
segregationist policies because zionists are resolutely and implacably
opposed to integration with palestinians. The only people in the zionist
state who believe in a multi-cultural society are ultra-lefties, “A tiny
minority of ultra-leftist jewish israelis identify themselves as non-
or anti zionist. Some of them aspire to see all of israel/palestine transformed
into a single state with citizenship and equal rights for all inhabitants
..”[33] Zionists do not want to integrate with palestinians
in order for both peoples to live peaceful together, vote for competing parties,
buy and exchange property. Zionists regard themselves as a special people i.e.
god’s chosen people and they despise palestinians as an inferior race. They
have a profound religious hatred for palestinians because palestinians are desecrating
the land that, three thousand years ago, god gave to the jews. Zionist religious
fundamentalists want palestinians out of palestine and if this means continually
provoking them into violence in order to justify the large-sale slaughter of
palestinians and mass deportations then this is what they are prepared to do.
It does not matter in the slightest bit how peaceful and accommodating the palestinians
try to become, it doesn’t matter how saintly they behave - the zionists are
racists who want palestinians off their god-given soil so that zionists can
live together, away from the polluting influences of all gentiles, in a racially
pure society. Ever since the founding of the zionist state a succession of extreme
right wing, zionist terrorists, such as menachem begin, yitshak shamir, benjamin
netanyahu, and ariel bin sharon, have continued to push the zionist state in
the direction of a racially pure, religiously intolerant, palestinian-free,
zionist state i.e. a zionist state with no palestinians living in the country,
or owning any land, or voting in any zionist elections. What extreme religious
zionist fundamentalists in the zionist state in palestine are trying to create
is a religiously homogenous, racially pure, zionist state run along talmudic
lines. The zionist state couldn’t be further from the western ideal of a secular,
liberal, freedom loving, multi-cultural, multi-faith, democracy. The critical reason why zionists will never encourage
palestinians to become zionist citizens, or to participate in zionist society,
or to obtain voting rights in the zionist state, is because this would mean
giving palestinians the right to own property - and this is something zionists
cannot tolerate. God has given the land to the jews and it is intolerable for
religiously minded jews to allow palestinians to live on that land. It is sacrilegious
for zionists to allow palestinians to live on the land. The zionist state is
a religious state whose overriding objective is to fulfil god’s law - and this
means reclaiming all the land god has given the jews. The zionists are intent on
achieving this goal even if this means murdering or massacring palestinians,
forcing them off their land and out of their own country. The zionist state in palestine is not merely
illegally occupying palestinian land, stealing palestinian land, continually
building illegal zionist settlements, continually bulldozing palestinians’ homes,
denying palestinian refugees the right to return to their land and property,
forcing palestinians to live in ghettos, terrorizing palestinians by sending
in tanks to deal with protests, carrying out a shoot to kill policy against
palestinian freedom fighters, and continually provoking palestinians into retaliation
in order to execute more palestinians, it is a religious fundamentalist, racist
society which not merely denies palestinians the right to own land but their
right to any presence in palestine. Denying palestinians a state is the least
of palestinians’ problems.
1.5.8: The Ghettoization of the Palestinians.
Just as the nazis did to the jews during the second
world war, the zionists have been pushing palestinians into ghettos. Michael
ignite claims the zionists have established so many zionist settlements
in palestine that even if the palestinians set up their own state it would
be little more than a bantustan, “Two years ago, an American friend took
me on a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Golan Heights over the Palestinian
West Bank. When I looked down at the West Bank, at the settlements like
Crusader forts occupying the high ground, at the Israeli security cordon
along the Jordan river closing off the Palestinian lands from Jordan,
I knew I was not looking down at a state or the beginnings of one, but
at a Bantustan, one of those pseudo-states created in the dying years
of apartheid to keep the African population under control.”[34] What ignatieff seems unwilling to countenance
is that the crypto-nazi zionist state has no intention of allowing palestinians
to live in a bantustan. Zionists want palestinians out of their own country
as the nazis wanted the jews out of germany and europe. The zionists have
put their souls in the bunker and refuse to face up to vileness of what
they have become i.e crypto-nazis. And yet, ironically, they are now achieving
what their persecutors accused them of trying to achieve seventy-eighty
years ago.
1.5.9: Checkpoint Humiliations for the Palestinians.
The only way that palestinians can leave their
ghettos is by passing through a succession of zionist checkpoints where
security checks are carried out. Passing through checkpoints is not like
a friendly visit to the passport office. It is an opportunity for zionists
to make life difficult for palestinians in the hope that yet more of them
will leave palestine. It is an opportunity to humiliate palestinians and
indulge in zionist supremacism. Desmond tutu draws parallels with what
happened in south africa, “I've been very deeply distressed in my visit
to the holy land; it reminded me so much of what happened to us black
people in South Africa. I have seen the humiliation of the Palestinians
at checkpoints and roadblocks, suffering like us when young white police
officers prevented us from moving about.”[35] Even mcbush, whose knowledge about what is
going on in palestine is negligible, seemed to realize the humiliation
that palestinians were being made to endure at these checkpoints, “The
israeli government should be compassionate at checkpoints and border crossings,
sparing innocent palestinians daily humiliation.”[36] There are some marvellous israelis who do their best to prevent
zionists from humiliating palestinians, “Machsomwatch, a group of israeli
women, sends observers to checkpoints to ensure that troops deal fairly
with arabs.”[37]
1.5.10: The Disney/Hollywood/CNN fantasy of a Democratic
Zionist State.
Given that western, secular, multi-cultural, freedom-loving,
liberal democracies are moving in exactly the opposite direction to the segregationist,
apartheid system being created by the zionist state why is it that american
and brutish governments fail to denounce the racism of the zionist state and
the racism of successive zionist prime ministers? Why is it that moderately
intelligent people like jeremy paxman and the editor of the ‘new statesman’
argue that the zionist state is democratic when its most obvious characteristic
is that it is a racist state which firstly, prevents palestinians from moving
back to their own country; secondly, excludes palestinians from owning land
in their own country; thirdly, excludes palestinians from voting in their own
country; and, fourthly, has no intention of integrating with palestinians? The
answer is either that they are ignorant about what is going on in palestine
or, more feasibly, they’re zionist muppets. Those promoting the belief that
the zionist state in palestine is a western, secular, multi-cultural, multi-faith,
liberal, freedom loving democracy, rather than a vile crypto-nazi state, provide
a justification for the actions taken by bin laden.
|
||
|
1.6.1: The Anti-Zionism of Religious Jews.
Up until the 20thc, most jews living in palestine
were devout religious jews. Joel beinin & lisa hajjar argue, “Until
the beginning of the 20thc, most jews living in palestine were concentrated
in four cities with religious significance. Most of them observed traditional,
orthodox religious practices. Many spent their time studying religious
texts and depended on the charity of world jewry for survival. Their attachment
to the land was religious rather than national and they were not involved
in - or supportive of - the zionist movement which began in europe and
was brought to palestine by immigrants.”[38] Paradoxically, religious jews were anti-zionist,
“Most orthodox jews were anti-zionist. They believed that only god should
reunite jews in the promised land, and regarded zionism as a violation
of god’s will. Although orthodox jews continued to oppose the creation
of a jewish state for several more decades, they supported mass settlement
of jews in palestine as a means of strengthening and protecting the community.”[39] The fact that religious jews were anti-zionist
didn’t stop them from having a considerable impact on the formation of the zionist
state because, in contradistinction to western democracies, the zionist state
is a religious state. It wasn’t until the six days war in 1967 that
religious jews dramatically changed their views, “And following the 1967
arab-israeli war, most orthodox jews who previously had resisted zionism
adopted the belief that israel’s overwhelming victory in the war was a
sign of god’s support and fulfilment of god’s promise to bring about the
messianic era. The areas captured and occupied in 1967, especially the
west bank, were important to religious jews because they are the core
of the biblical land of israel (judea and sumaria). Consequently, israel’s
victory in 1967 gave rise to a more religious variation of zionism. Some
existing political parties representing orthodox jews came to embrace
religious nationalism, and new parties and movements formed to advocate
israel’s permanent control and settlement in the west bank and gaza.”[40]
1.6.2: The Religious Nutters running the Zionist State.
Once fundamentalist jews committed themselves to
the jewish state, they put their vast wealth, intellectualism, and political
commitment, into protecting the zionist state from external threat and into
political efforts to introduce more and more religious laws into the zionist
state. There is a powerful minority of religious zionists trying to ensure that
the zionist state is run along religious rather than secular lines. The consequences
of the increasing religious nature of the zionist state have been firstly, to
make the creation of a multi-cultural society virtually impossible and, secondly,
to make compromises with the palestinians next to impossible. The reason for
this is quite simply: religious zionists do not want palestinians living in
palestine. A fundamentalist zionist state is possible only in a palestinian-free
palestine. Jewish fundamentalists are nutcases who ideologically
hate palestinians with a ferocity bordering on insanity because they believe
that three thousand years ago, god gave jews the land of palestine and
palestinian possession of this land is sacrilegious. They believe god
has given them the land of palestine so it is their religious duty to
recover this land from the aliens who have taken possession of it. They
would be ignoring god’s commandments allowing non-jews to live on this
sacred land. Fundamentalist zionists not want palestinians owning the
land god given to the jews. They cannot tolerate palestinians living on,
and thus corrupting, god’s land. And, most critically of all, they do
not want palestinians engaging in non-jewish religious forms of worship
on jewish land.[41] To
crypto-nazi, jewish fundamentalists, it is intolerable for palestinians
to use god’s land for the worship of other gods. As a consequence, it
doesn’t matter how peaceful and civilized palestinians might be, in the
eyes of talmudic jews, palestinians are sacrilegious. It has to be suggested that zionist fundamentalists
do not have merely religious hatreds for palestinians. Religious jews believe
that god has told the jews they are special and that they are superior to all
other races. They thus look upon palestinians as inferior beings who do not
deserve civil or political rights. The religious crypto-nazi, rehavam ze'evi,
believed the best way of dealing with palestinians was deportation. He
publicly reviled palestinians as locusts and doubtlessly, in private,
believed the best thing to do with them would be to force them out of
their ghettos and into concentration camps. Many religious zionists doubtlessly
have similar views. Christopher hitchens pointed out that .. “sharon has
invited into his cabinet the leaders of a party which openly calls for
the mass expulsion of the palestinians from the west bank; a racist demand
which if implemented would lead to a thousand year war in the region.
The bush administration has never expressed any opinion on this disgraceful
concession.”[42]
After a palestinian martyr had killed a number of zionist colonizers the
reaction from these jewish religious fundamentalists was all too clear,
“And in the aftermath of the bombing, jews stood in the blood-soaked street
chanting, “No arabs, no terror attacks.”[43] In other words, they were calling for the mass
deportation of palestinians from their own country.
One of the main ways that zionists have sought
to consolidate their control over the palestinian land they have annexed,
has been by building zionist settlements on militarily strategic points
across occupied palestine - even if this has meant putting them in close
proximity to palestinian areas. These housing settlements are fortified
like military outposts and then linked with roads to enable the zionist
army to protect them. Alexander stockport has pointed out that palestinians’
.. “land is criss crossed by the israeli military ...”[44]
Greg philo makes the same point, “As Avi Shlaim suggests, the settlements
were part of a policy of exerting strategic and military control, by for
example "surrounding the huge greater Jerusalem area with two concentric
circles of settlements with access roads and military positions".”[45]
Although the zionist state is organized along racial
lines it is overlain with a class structure in which palestinians provide cheap
labour for rich zionists.
Since the founding of the zionist state in palestine,
the zionist government has forced millions of palestinians from their
own homes, from their land, and even from their own country. Some of those
who did not flee were deported. After the 1967 war, many palestinians
moved to the lebanon where some became guerrilla fighters launching attacks
on the zionist state in palestine. In 1978 the zionists invaded the lebanon
in order to push these guerrilla fighters out of the country and thus
even further away from their homes and their country. The zionists ignored
a united nations’ resolution against the invasion. As robert fisk explains
.. “an Israeli invasion of Lebanon designed to drive the PLO out of
the country and given the green light by the then US Secretary of State,
Alexander Haig which cost the lives of 17,500 Lebanese and Palestinians,
almost all of them civilians. That's probably three times the death toll
in the World Trade Centre. Yet I do not remember any vigils or memorial
services or candle-lighting in America or the West for the innocent dead
of Lebanon; I don't recall any stirring speeches about democracy or liberty.
In fact, my memory is that the United States spent most of the bloody
months of July and August 1982 calling for "restraint".”[46]
Ariel sharon was the zionists defence minister
in charge of the invasion of the lebanon. He allowed the zionists’ allies,
the christian militias, to massacre unarmed, defenceless, palestinians
in refugee camps at sabra and chatilla, just outside beirut. Many men
were tortured or mutilated before being killed, and some women were raped.
Some say that about 300 were killed, others 1200, and others suggest even
higher numbers. Kevin toolis has stated, “The gunmen shot women and children
like dogs in the street. A later israeli enquiry, the kahan commission,
blamed sharon personally for the massacre.”[47] Robert fisk
has highlighted the injustice of this slaughter by comparing it with recent
events, “Nineteen years ago today, the greatest act of terrorism using
Israel's own definition of that much misused word in modern Middle Eastern
history began. Does anyone remember the anniversary in the West? How many
readers of this article will remember it? I will take a tiny risk and
say that no other British newspaper certainly no American newspaper
will today recall the fact that on 16 September 1982, Israel's Phalangist
militia allies started their three-day orgy of rape and knifing and murder
in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Chatila that cost 1,800
lives.”[48]
After the zionist army had ousted palestinian freedom
fighters from the lebanon, the zionists withdrew their forces from most
of the country - but not all. They continued to occupy a 10 mile wide
buffer zone inside lebanon to protect the zionist state’s northern border.
From this position the zionist army was able to launch attacks on the
rest of the country, “In 1996, israeli guns shelled a united nations base,
killing more than 100 lebanese civilians seeking shelter there.”[49]
The zionist government ignored repeated united nations’ resolutions to
end its illegal occupation of southern lebanon - as did the united states
and brutland. Even in 1990 when the allies were building a coalition to
force iraq to abide by united nations’ resolutions none of the countries
in the alliance made any attempt to force the zionist government in palestine
to abide by united nations’ resolutions concerning the lebanon - which
is why most arab/moslem countries believe that allied countries only support
resolutions which apply to countries they don’t like. Any impartial and
fair minded person would have to conclude that the allies were hypocrites,
implementing a discriminatory i.e. racist policy.
In 1999 ehud barak won the zionist general election and
sought to conclude a peace agreement with the palestinians that had been
on the backburner for years whilst the racist benjamin netanhayu, with
his pure zionist blood, had been in office. Islamic militants were killing
zionist soldiers in the lebanon and he decided the price for maintaining
the occupation was too high, “Clearly, hezbollah had made the cost to
israel of remaining in lebanon - where, unofficially, at least 1,500 of
its men have died - too great to bear.”[50] Ariel sharon was none too pleased at the withdrawal
which .. “was the first forced retreat of the israeli army from arab soil
in 52 years.”[51]
The gulf war had nothing to do with the allies’
desire to protect the world’s oil supplies - after all if saddam hussein
had annexed kuwait he would have been as intent on selling its oil as
the kuwaitis. (Kuwait, it ought to be remembered, had been concocted by
the brutish in the 1920s to limit iraq’s power). It wasn’t as if he was
going to refuse to sell oil to the americans or the rest of the world.
What he would have done is to have used the oil revenue to enhance his
military machine. This was something the zionists would not tolerate.
Throughout the 1980s, the zionist state had repeatedly warned the american
government about arming saddam hussein in the war against iran because
it feared the build up of the iraqi army. Zionists regarded iraq as a
dangerous threat to their hegemony of the region.[52]
The zionists feared that a wealthy, oil rich, saddam would rebuild his
armed forces to rival those of the zionists. A zionist attack on iraq
would obviously have triggered off a widescale conflict across the middle
east, so america and brutland were thus forced into fighting a proxy zionist
war against kuwait.[53]
The zionists were thrilled. Not merely was iraq about to be militarily
pulverized, but america and brutland would suffer the casualties whilst
the zionists could sit on the sidelines reaping the profits.
The reason the americans and the brutish maintained
sanctions over iraq after the end of the gulf war was to continue to protect
the zionists in palestine. They not only have to prevent middle eastern countries
from increasing their military strength in case they attack the zionist state,
they also have to prevent these countries from becoming industrially developed
in case they use their industrial expertise to construct weapons of mass destruction.
In other words, the entire region has to be kept in a de-industrialized state
for the sake of maintaining zionists’ military domination of the region. There
is little doubt that a fundamentalist zionist government would use its chemical,
biological, and nuclear, weapons to create a holocaust across the middle east
if it felt sufficiently threatened. The allies’ tactic of demilitarizing moslem
countries to prevent them from threatening the zionist state, is better described
as deindustrialization.
1.14.1: The Bulldozer’s Electioneering Provocations.
The negotiations between barak and the palestinians
weren’t going anywhere because barak wouldn’t accept the creation of a
palestinian state, he wouldn’t allow the return of palestinian refugees,
he wouldn’t return palestinian land, and he wouldn’t abide by outstanding
united nations’ resolutions imposed on the zionist state in palestine.
Zionists’ claimed the palestinians were at fault for not taking the negotiations
seriously but their participation in the negotiations had required enormous
sacrifices. According to hassan youssef, a hamas freedom fighter, “We
have given up three quarters of our historical rights in palestine for
the sake of peace. Palestinians wanted peace but the israelis didn’t.
Since the oslo peace accord they have demolished thousands of homes, confiscated
thousands of acres of land and killed thousands of our people.”[54]
Barak’s options for responding to palestinians’ compromises
were severely limited. He was under intense pressure from jewish fundamentalists
who insisted he should make no concessions - many of them were completely opposed
to any negotiations with palestinians. It didn’t matter to fundamentalist religious
nutters such as ariel bin sharon whether palestinians were the world’s most
pacifist people or the world’s worst terrorists because zionist fundamentalists
had no intention of stopping the reclamation of their sacred land and their
creation of a racially pure zionist state. In reality, it was much easier for
the zionists to fulfil their plan for the creation of a palestinian-free palestine
if the palestinians could be provoked into violence because this would provide
the zionists with the opportunity to slaughter palestinians, force them off
their land and out of their own country. Zionists were perfectly willing to
sacrifice jewish lives for the sake of zionist racial purity and their lebensraum policy.
The turning point in this impasse in the negotiations came
when ariel bin sharon (otherwise known as the bulldozer because of his
extraordinary religious zeal for bulldozing palestinians’ homes) deliberately
provoked the palestinians into violent protests. At the end of september
2000 sharon walked into the haram mosque in jerusalem, the third holiest
in islam. The symbolism of his visit was that one day the zionists would
take complete control of this building and convert it back to use for
jews which, in turn, also symbolized the fact that the zionists wanted
the removal of all palestinians from palestine. As he’d hoped for, his
visit provoked violent demonstrations. Suzanne goldenberg reported, “Dozens
of people were injured in rioting on the West Bank and in Jerusalem yesterday
as the hawkish Likud party leader, Ariel Sharon, staged a provocative
visit to a Muslim shrine at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Surrounded by hundreds of Israeli riot police, Mr Sharon and a handful
of Likud politicians marched up to the Haram al-Sharif, the site of the
gold Dome of the Rock that is the third holiest shrine in Islam. The symbolism
of the visit to the Haram by Mr Sharon - reviled for his role in the 1982
massacre of Palestinians in a refugee camp in Lebanon - and its timing
was unmistakable. "This is a dangerous process conducted by Sharon
against Islamic sacred places," Yasser Arafat told Palestinian television.
Although the Haram is part of Arab East Jerusalem, occupied illegally
by Israel since 1967, Jews revere the esplanade, which they call the Temple
Mount, as the site of a temple destroyed in AD70. The 35-acre site is
the single biggest obstacle to peace and, as Mr Sharon asserted yesterday,
an inalienable part of the Jewish state. Palestinians and Israeli liberals
denounced the visit as a dangerous provocation. "The timing and the
decision to visit the Haram was taken to flare up the area and to burn
up the place,” said a blood-splattered Ahmed Tibi, an Israeli Arab member
of the knesset, who suffered a broken wrist in the scuffles at the shrine.
"He wants to see more blood and more killing. He wants to kill the
peace."”[55]
The following day there were widespread riots, “The most hallowed
ground in the holy city - and the volatile core of the Israeli-Arab conflict
- was doused in blood yesterday as rioting between Muslim worshippers
and Israeli police left four Palestinians dead, and as many as 200 wounded.”[56] Sharon’s provocation was so inflammatory it sparked off the
second palestinian intifada.
Sharon’s provocation was an astute manoeuvre which brought
him many political benefits. Firstly, it helped him gain the support of many
zionist fundamentalists in the likud party to become its candidate in the next
general election - in the process, beating off the challenge from the extreme
racist benjamin netanhayu. Secondly, it helped him to gain the support of religious
extremists and zionist fascists in the country thereby enabling him win the
2000 general election. Thirdly, it enabled him to make the palestinians look
like extremists so that public opinion around the world would sympathize with
the zionists. And, fourthly, it enabled him to end peace discussions with the
palestinians on the grounds that it was not possible to negotiate with those
who resorted to violence. Sharon’s dirty tactic worked a treat. He won his party’s
candidacy for the general election. He won the general election. He ended negotiations
with the palestinians. Politically, sharon’s tactic proved to be decisive. It
was the turning point in 21stc middle east politics. All the events that have
happened since that date derive clearly and unambiguously from ariel sharon’s
crypto-nazi racism.
There was, however, one small drawback to the success of sharon’s
evil tactic - the deaths of many zionists. In other words, sharon knew that
the success of his tactic was dependent, to a large extent, on the fact that
his provocation of palestinians would lead to retaliation in which many zionists
would die. And yet he was perfectly prepared to sacrifice some of his own people
for his own political success and the greater goal of zionist racial purity.
The deaths of zionists was crucial to his plan for frightening zionists into
voting for him in both the likud party elections and the general election. He
must have been extremely pleased every time a zionist died because it meant
thousands more zionist votes.
This was one of the most blatant acts of provocation in recent
middle east history. The zionist dominated brutish media totally ignored sharon’s
evil tactic and reversed the course of history by portraying the violence in
palestine as being initiated by palestinians rather than by the mad religious
nutter, ariel bin sharon. The zionists in the brutish media portray violence
in the middle east as something like a stack of plates in which each plate represents
the palestinians initiating violence and the zionists using violence to defend
themselves from so-called terrorists. Each act of palestinian violence and zionist
self defence is a discrete phenomena, a plate, separate from the next act, or
plate, of palestinian initiated violence and zionist retaliation. Zionist violence
wipes the plate clean - it does not lead to any retaliation by palestinians.
The propaganda benefits for the zionists of this portrayal
of violence in the middle east are firstly, palestinians always start the violence
(which means it can never be justified); secondly, zionists only retaliate against
palestinian violence (which means they are justified in defending themselves);
thirdly, zionists’ so-called acts of retaliation never trigger off any palestinian
violence - indeed, in the eyes of the brutish media, zionist violence has never
provoked palestinian violence; fourthly, because it is always palestinians who
initiate violence it is easy to define them as evil people; fifthly, because
zionists only defend themselves against terrorists they can be defined as the
good guys; sixthly, the zionist state, armed with chemical, biological, nuclear,
weapons, fighter aircraft, helicopter gunships, bulldozers, tanks, state of
the art missiles, tens of thousands of highly trained soldiers, vast supplies
of weapons, etc are always the underdog in the terrible fight against unarmed
palestinians. The zionist is always the innocent, defenceless, victim who bravely
faces up to the overwhelming power of the palestinian people - even though they’re
unarmed. It is thus impossible for zionists to reach a peace agreement with
palestinians because palestinians are evil people who, for no reason whatsoever,
continually attack peace loving, friendly, zionists who only want to live in
harmony with their arab neighbours. This is the sheer fantasy world in which
western politicians and their zionist paymasters live.
In the real world, of course, sharon has always initiated violence
and provoked palestinian retaliation in order to justify zionists’ use
of even greater levels of violence against palestinians. This has created
a spiral of violence which ariel bin sharon continually whips up through
increasing provocations. Zionists complain bitterly when the media uses
the analogy of the spiral of violence because it suggests that ariel bin
sharon has had a part to play in provoking palestinian retaliation when,
according to them, this has never been the case. When benjamin netanhayu
was interviewed on newsnight he attempted to cover up sharon’s responsibility
for initiating palestinian retaliation by refusing to accept the notion
of a spiral of violence in the middle east - let alone one that was initiated
by sharon.[57]
The jewish dominated media in both brutland and america have thus reversed
history and have tried to minimize zionists’ doubts about their self righteousness
by banning the phrase ‘the spiral of violence’. The zionists who concocted
this propaganda are racists posing as liberal anti-racists doing their
best to protect the racist zionist state and its racist government.
It is frequently jewish commentators who report on events in
palestine, and who thus help to give the news, both in brutland and america,
such a distorted interpretation - there are no palestinian reporters in the
brutish media. Another technique used by zionist bigots in the media is interviewing
bereaved zionists - but never bereaved palestinians. This is because only jewish
victims are ooman - palestinian victims are racially inferior, sub-oomans who
don’t deserve to be interviewed. Jewish commentators provide as many details
as they can about the lives and the dazzling future prospects of the zionists
who have died as a result of palestinian violence because this is intended to
elicit public sympathy in brutland (and america) for the zionist racists. However,
they rarely provide similar details about palestinians slaughtered by their
zionist oppressors because, once again, palestinians are sub-oomans. Interviewing
bereaved zionists contrasts markedly with the fact that zionist reporters and
the zionist-dominated media never interview, or reveal any details about, the
religious nutters in ariel bin sharon’s government because if the brutish public
discovered how many crypto-nazis were in his cabinet then their support for
the zionists would evaporate.
Prior to september 2000, there was still the chance of peace
in palestine. Despite the problems, yasser arafat and ehud barak were
still negotiating a peace agreement. It was ariel bin sharon who, in a
cold, calculating, and purely evil way, completely scuppered any chance
of successful peace negotiations, “On february 6th 2001, likud leader
ariel sharon defeated ehud barak and became israel’s prime minister. He
proceeded to assemble the most right wing government in israel’s history.”[58]
1.14.2: The Bulldozer’s Response to the Intifada.
After sharon became prime minister he was
able to use the zionist army to provoke palestinians and thus reap more
and more popular support for his hardline stance i.e. the end of the peace
process, the disavowal of earlier peace agreements, the construction of
more illegal zionist settlements, the zionists’ reoccupation of palestine,
the removal of impure palestinian blood and the slaughter of more palestinians,
“In the four months of the palestinian uprising before sharon’s election,
34 israeli civilians and 20 soldiers were killed by arab militants. Since
sharon launched his crackdown, 217 israeli civilians and 76 soldiers have
died.”[59]
What made sharon’s response to the palestinian intifada even more provocative
was the way palestinians were slaughtered, “Of the hundreds killed and
thousands wounded during the uprising, 90% have been palestinian civilians,
45% have been under 18 years of age and 60% were shot while in their homes,
schools and workplaces.”[60]
Sharon’s visit to the haram mosque initiated a spiral of zionist
propelled violence which led directly to the april 2002 invasion of palestine.
As soon as sharon was elected as prime minister of the zionist state, everyone
knew there would be an increase in the momentum of violence and that, ultimately,
it was only a question of time before a wholesale reoccupation took place.
1.14.3: The Bulldozer’s Policy for Increasing Illegal Zionist
Settlements.
Since the founding of the zionist state there
have been only two ways for zionist fundamentalists to turn palestine
into a palestinian free country. Firstly, military conquest. Since most
of palestine had already been conquered this was no longer a major factor.
Secondly, in peacetime, demolishing palestinian homes and businesses,
confiscating their land, and then building illegal zionist settlements
on the expropriated land. For sharon, the construction of settlements
is vital not merely for zionist expansionism but for provoking further
palestinian retaliation which he can then use as a justification not only
for slaughtering more palestinians but for building more illegal settlements.
As has been pointed out, illegal settlements are not merely a way of providing
homes for jewish immigrants - they are also intended to shift the military
balance of power between the zionists and palestinians, “There are some
200,000 Jewish settlers in the occupied Palestinian territories. Some
are religious zealots, who believe fervently that the land is theirs,
by the gift of God. Others are secular nationalists, equally passionate
in their conviction that Israel must hold on to its 1967 conquests. The
settlers control vast swathes of territory, connected by "security
roads" patrolled by the military. In the Gaza Strip, where there
are just 6,000 settlers living among 1m Palestinians, at least one fifth
of the land is Israeli-controlled. The settlement issue is one of the
most intractable issues facing Israel and the Palestinians in their interminable
search for a lasting peace.”[61]; “Hebron
is a city of some 130,000 people, of whom 500 are Jewish settlers of the
most rabidly rightwing kind. They, and the soldiers guarding them, already
control 20% of the city.”[62] Finally, zionists’ construction of illegal
settlements is also intended to scupper peace negotiations with the palestinians
.. “in a letter to the US consul, Ron Schlicher, the Palestinian information
minister, Yasser Abed Rabbo, condemned the continuation of settlement
building, saying it has "always sent a message to the Palestinian
people that Israel is not really interested in ending its illegal occupation".”[63]
For the last three decades, sharon has been at the forefront
of the american-financed, illegal, zionist settlement boom. He was once
the zionist government’s housing minister. Since he became prime minister
he has embarked on a huge number of illegal settlements because he has
no intention of negotiating with palestinians and no intention of handing
back any land to palestinians. On the contrary, like his beloved political
colleague, the crypto-nazi zionist rehavam zeevi, he wants palestinians
out of palestine, “Sharon who, for three decades, has been the patron
of the Jewish enclaves in the West Bank and Gaza, which are considered
illegal under international law. According to an aerial survey by Israeli
human rights group Peace Now last week, 25 new outposts have sprouted
on the stony hills of the West Bank since Sharon became Prime Minister
despite his promise to the US not to build any new settlements. ”[64] The zionists have kept vast tracts of land
empty in palestine for the simple reason that they are biding their time
to build new illegal settlements - usually with the aid of american government
funds which the american government refuses to provide for its own people
in america. The jewish lobby must be some powerful force when it is capable
of obtaining grants for houses in palestine when americans can’t get grants
to build houses in america.
For the last fifty years the zionists have been carrying out
the repulsive practice of demolishing the homes of those they suspect of involvement
in what they absurdly call palestinian terrorism. Virtually everyday palestinians
have to watch houses and businesses being demolished and then their land stolen
for zionist settlements. On september 11th 2001 the zionists finally got a real
good taste of their own medicine when osama bin laden demolished a couple of
zionist buildings. What goes round comes around - but this didn’t stop the zionist
dominated american media from making political capital out of the p*ny events.
It’s difficult to imagine a more vile and disgusting act of revenge than that
commonly carried out by sicko zionists demolishing the homes of palestinian
freedom fighters. Perhaps when ariel bin sharon is convicted for crimes against
the palestinian people his home ought to be bulldozed. Is it really a part of
civilized life to continually bulldoze the homes of those fighting for freedom?
1.14.4: The Bulldozer’s Shoot to Kill Policy.
The zionists’ ‘shoot to kill’ policy was initiated
by ehud barak. Not surprisingly, the rate of executions increased after sharon
became prime minister. The zionists claim these are ‘targeted’ killings aimed
solely at palestinian freedom fighters but this is just racist propaganda since
a number of palestinian women and children have been killed who had nothing
to do with the liberation struggle. There are now zionist death squads roaming
palestinian areas searching for new palestinian targets. This is one of the
main factors which makes the zionist state in palestine one of the world’s leading
terrorist states. Once again, sharon uses these executions as a means of provoking
palestinian retaliation, even if it means the deaths of further zionists, because
this provides him with the justification for shooting more unarmed civilians,
including children, involved in the intifada.
Once again the brutish media conspires with crypto-nazi zionists
over the presentation of this state terrorism. Zionists insist that the
brutish media refer to these executions as ‘targeted killings’. The purpose
of calling them ‘targeted killings’ is to enable zionists to suggest they
are not initiating violence only responding to it. This is somewhat devious
since, as far as sharon is concerned, the purpose of these executions
is precisely to provoke palestinian retaliation which enables him to slaughter
more palestinians.[65]
It shows the degree of zionist power over the brutish media
when zionists invade palestine, enslave palestinians, and then accuse them of
being terrorists for trying to recover their land. The zionists initiated the
violence by creating a zionist state. All that sharon has done is to increase
the momentum of this violence to bring about increased palestinian retaliation.
It might be argued, this interpretation of events in palestine falls apart to
the extent that if palestinians didn’t respond violently then sharon’s policies
would never work and there would be peace in palestine. Perhaps there are palestinians
who might agree with this. The problem is that firstly, when people are constantly
being oppressed, humiliated, terrorized, and deliberately provoked by fascists
it is almost impossible to stop retaliation. Secondly, it also has to be suggested
that ariel bin sharon would always find a way of provoking palestinian retaliation
because there is no other way for him to regain all of the old testament land
of israel. The bravery of palestinian freedom fighters against their vile oppressors
is truly remarkable.
According to john pilger, the allies even gave sharon the go-ahead
for his policies of provocation, “In may and july last year, the authoritative
jane’s foreign report disclosed that britain and france had given “the
green light” to sharon to attack arafat if the palestinian resistance
did not stop. On 23rd november 2001, israeli agents assassinated the hamas
leader mahmud abu hunud. Twelve days later, the inevitable response came
in a co-ordinated suicide attacks against israel. On cue, sharon’s military
attacked the occupied territories with unprecedented force.”[66]
1.14.5: The Bulldozer’s Hopes for Further Zionist Expansionism.
Sharon has never had any intention of negotiating
with palestinians. He has not the slightest intention of returning occupied
land because he is a demonic religious nutter who believes god gave the
land to jews and the palestinians currently living on the land are a disgrace
to this fictitious jewish god. He wants more jewish settlements in illegally occupied
areas not less, “Israeli premier ariel sharon yesterday begged one million
jews to return to their homeland. He said it was the only way his beleaguered
nation could guarantee its security. The premier slammed arafat as “not
a partner for negotiation. They suffer heavy casualties, we suffer heavy
casualties and there is one man, only one, to blame and that’s arafat,
because he could have avoided it.” Israel currently has 5.2 million jews
and 1.2 million arabs. During the past decade one million jewish immigrants
have settled in israel, mainly from the former soviet union.”[67] Notice sharon’s use of the word ‘beleaguered’
which is a bit of ziono-psycho babble used to pretend the zionist state
isn’t a chemical, biological, and nuclear, power fighting unarmed civilians.
|
|
Ariel bin sharon’s provocations have been intended
to push more and more palestinians into extremism so that he can pursue his
racist agenda. He wants palestinians to retaliate because he knows this will
make the peace process more and more difficult and provide him with the chance
to further expand and consolidate the zionist state - thereby provoking further
palestinian retaliation. The zionists initiated violence in palestine by creating
a zionist state and sharon has initiated a spiral of violence against the palestinians
because he and the zionist state is the primary beneficiary of the violence.
In any dispute, the easiest way of determining guilt is by finding the beneficiary
and, in the middle east conflict, the main beneficiary by far has been ariel
bin sharon. It swept him to the leadership of his party, it swept him to a general
election victory, and each time a palestinian freedom fighter retaliates it
increases his political popularity. Sharon is in the ‘fortunate’ position of
being able to benefit from the spiral of violence which he triggered off.
For many years sharon has taken on the mantle, from previous
zionist prime ministers, of the great poisoner of zionist-palestinian relationships.
Since sharon co-opted himself onto the allies’ war against terrorism there is
a possibility he will use the same provocation tactics on moslems around the
middle east. He wants to push more and more moslems into violence since this
will enable him to take the final push towards a racially free, religious, zionist
state.
Sharon is a mass murderer who has slaughtered just
as many people as bin laden. Of much greater concern, however, is that sharon
possesses the potential to carry out a far greater slaughter than bin laden.
It is frequently stated that bin laden would have killed 25,000 or 250,000 americans
if he could have done so. There is very little chance of this happening. However,
the number of people who could be slaughtered by ariel bin sharon is vast. There
is little doubt that he would exterminate large parts of the arab world in the
middle east using his nuclear, chemical, and biological, weapons should he feel
this would help in the racial purification of the zionist state.
During the formation of the allied coalition to
fight the 1990 gulf war, the allies promised arab/moslem countries that in return
for their support, the americans would make efforts to formulate a peace agreement
between the palestinians and the zionists in palestine. This was nearly achieved.
But as soon as the mass murderer ariel bin sharon set foot in the haram al-sharif
mosque and deliberately stirred up palestinian protests to help him win the
zionist general election, all hopes for peace in the country disappeared. The
bigoted, intransigent, racist, fundamentalists dominating zionist politics constantly
provoke the palestinians. Hopes for peace grew even more distant when mcbush
came into office. His gross historical stupidity and complete disinterest in
the world beyond america, led him, like so many other presidents before him,
to turn his back on the middle east and allowed the zionists in his own government
to collaborate with the zionist government to implement more and more acts of
barbarism on the palestinian people. Mcbush was more concerned about taking
a nap or playing golf than in curbing zionist oppression of palestinians. In
other words, the american government was falling into its old habit - stirring
up a conflict (by financing and arming the zionist state) and then turning its
back on the conflict by reneging upon a promise to bring about peace. American
people believe they can stand tall in the world but to vast numbers of people
around the world all they see are americans’ backs as they head off home to
the luxuries of their ecocidal cornucopian paradise. Perhaps american presidents
have watched too many films in which cowboys ride off into the sunset with their
backs to the camera and believe there is something profoundly macho in riding
away from problems and leaving people to stew in the mess they’ve just created.
In effect, the allies reneged on their promise to bring peace to the middle
east. They failed to combat zionist racists and, not surprisingly, in april
2002, this ended up with the zionists’ reoccupation of palestine.
Throughout the last couple of decades the zionist
state in palestine has been ruled by a number of extreme right-wing zionists,
one of them a terrorist and another a mass murderer, who have done everything
they could to avoid a peace agreement with the palestinians. Their oppression
of the palestinian people has been appalling. The zionists have:-
- created millions of stateless palestinian
refugees.
- annexed palestinian land.
- stolen palestinian land.
- built illegal zionist settlements on palestinian
land.
- carried out a lebensraum
policy.
- demolished the homes of suspected palestinian freedom
fighters even if that person doesn’t own that home but is living in the family
home.
- kept palestinians locked up in ghettos.
- forced palestinians to carry identity papers.
- forced palestinians to run the gauntlet of roadside
checks by zionist soldiers who scrutinize their every move - which is similar
to the pass laws in south africa although zionist commentators in the brutish
and america media never make such a comparison.
- tortured palestinians suspected of being freedom
fighters and palestinians who might have useful information - some of whom have
been completely broken by the experience.
imprisoned palestinians on suspicion of involvement
in liberation activities.
deported palestinians from their own land and their
own country.
provoked palestinians into retaliating so that they
could murder more defenceless palestinian protestors - including children.
- executed alleged palestinian freedom fighters,
“The israeli army struck at the heart of yasser arafat’s administration
by assassinating an officer in his personal security guard .. ayad joins
more than 20 victims of israel’s official policy of assassinating palestinians
it accuses of attacks on soldiers and civilians. All of the operations
were sanctioned by outgoing prime minister, ehud barak, who yesterday
sent “heartfelt congratulations” to the army for killing ayud.”[68]
The mundi club feels exactly the same way about rehavam zeevi.
- behaved irresponsibly during military operations
“accidentally” murdering innocent palestinians.
used fighter aircraft to attack palestinian police
which, like all police stations around the world, are in civilian areas.
- tried to create a racially pure society.
In sum, “Since the oslo peace accord they have demolished thousands
of homes, confiscated thousands of acres of land and killed thousands
of our people.”[69] It can be concluded, from this appalling barbarism
that if the pentagon and the twin towers had been built in zionist occupied
palestine then bin laden’s attack on them would have been fully justified.
The zionists’ treatment of palestinians is far more
oppressive and violent than white dominated south africa’s treatment of blacks.
The racist zionist state has been the main cause of wars and bloodshed in the
middle east ever since it was established.
Militarily the zionist state in palestine has little
to fear from its arab neighbours. Mark dowdney has pointed out that, “Israel
retains its nuclear weapons, a vast army and air force capable of defeating
any of its arab adversaries.”[70] The
united states continues to insist that the zionist state does not possess
nuclear weapons. In 2001 it punished india and pakistan for testing nuclear
weapons but has never punished the zionist state - how can it punish the
zionist state when it does not posses such weapons.
1.21: America provides the Finance and the Munitions for
Zionists to Murder and Deport Palestinians.
Robert fisk shows the extent of the zionists’ dependence
on american weapons, “America's name is literally stamped on to the missiles
fired by Israel into Palestinian buildings in Gaza and the West Bank.
Only four weeks ago, I identified one of them as an AGM 114-D air-to-ground
rocket made by Boeing and Lockheed-Martin at their factory in of all
places Florida, the state where some of the suiciders trained to fly.
It was fired from an Apache helicopter (made in America, of course) during
the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, when hundreds of cluster bombs were
dropped in civilian areas of Beruit by the Israelis in contravention of
undertakings given to the United States. Most of the bombs had US Naval
markings and America then suspended a shipment of fighter bombers to Israel
for less than two months. The same type of missile this time an AGM
114-C made in Georgia was fired by the Israelis into the back of an
ambulance near the Lebanese village of Mansori, killing two women and
four children. I collected the pieces of the missile, including its computer
coding plate, flew to Georgia and presented them to the manufacturers
at the Boeing factory. And what did the developer of the missile say to
me when I showed him photographs of the children his missile had killed?
"Whatever you do," he told me, "don't quote me as saying
anything critical of the policies of Israel."”[71]
American governments have financed and armed the zionist state
and then turned their backs on the terrorism the zionists have perpetrated
on palestinians. Just a week before the p*ny bombings the zionist dominated
american government yet again contemptuously turned its back on the rest
of the world which was incensed about the segregationist, apartheid regime
in israel, “The united states yesterday pulled out of the united nations’
conference against racism after israel was criticised as “racist and apartheid”.
The israeli team also quit the event in south africa in protest.”[72]
During the 1990s the allies adopted a tactic of
strengthening the zionists and demilitarizing moslem countries in order to encourage
the zionists to conduct negotiations with the palestinians. The fundamental
drawback of this tactic is that all that it did was to make the zionists feel
even more confident about oppressing palestinians thereby decreasing the prospects
for peace. The zionists know they can get away with continually provoking palestinians
because they have the support of zionists in the brutish/american governments,
the zionists in congress/parliament, the zionist lobbies in brutland/america,
and also the support of the zionist dominated brutish/american medias. The allies
believed that sharon would negotiate only from a position of strength but as
soon as the racists are in a position of strength they provoke the palestinians
and make it impossible for them to negotiate.
The zionist state in palestine is flouting many united
nations’ resolutions.
1.23.1: Compensation for Palestinian Refugees after the founding
of the Zionist State.
The oldest resolutions being flouted by the zionists
are those going back to the founding of the zionist state and the creation of
palestinian refugees. In other words, for over sixty years the zionist state
has been refusing to allow palestinians to return to their land let alone pay
compensation for the loss of the property or the suffering endured by palestinian
refugees forced to flee the country. This did not stop the zionists demanding
compensation from a number of european countries involved in the nazis’ creation
of jewish refugees during the second world war - which shows the sheer contempt
zionists have for any notion of fair play.
1.23.2: Resolutions concerning the 1967 War.
Some united nations’ resolutions applicable
to the zionist state go back to 1967. The zionists, and their american
muppets, are still flouting these resolutions, “The Bush administration,
radically departing from decades of US policy, is said to have affirmed
not only the right to statehood, but support for UN resolutions 242 and 338, calling on Israel
to withdraw from all the lands it has occupied illegally since the Six
Day war of 1967.[73] But there are plenty of others since then. Ben cohen pointed
out, "Since 1967, the United Nations Security Council has passed
15 resolutions criticizing Israel's behaviour. None of them have been
acted upon. They include: Resolution 267 condemning Israel’s annexation
of East Jerusalem in 1980; Resolution
441 calling for the creation of a UN Commission to examine illegal
settlements in the occupied territories."[74] Prior to
iraq's invasion of kuwait, the americans had blocked or watered down every
resolution put to the security council condemning the zionists' infringements
of ooman rights and the geneva convention.
The special relationship that exists between
america and the zionist state is far more intimate than the oft mentioned
special relationship between america and brutland. The american body politic
is so dominated by what is politely called the jewish lobby that in foreign
affairs the american government is more of a zionist puppet propping up
its middle east master than a global superpower propping up a dependent
satellite country. Julian borger has stated, “In Jewish-American and conservative
circles, President Bush's father still has not been forgiven for merely
threatening to withdraw loan guarantees nine years ago - a factor in his
1992 election defeat. ”[75] Ariel bin sharon regularly launches terrorist
operations against palestinians in defiance of american requests, “Ariel
Sharon further signalled his contempt yesterday for the US diplomatic
strategy of mending fences with the Arab world, by launching the heaviest
Israeli military offensive since the start of the Palestinian uprising
last year.”[76]
The creation of the jewish state was promoted
through the slogan, "A country without a people for a people without a
country" which presupposes that the palestinians are a non-people. This
slogan is remarkably similar to that used by the nazis during their invasion
of eastern europe when it also started disposing of non-people. The zionist
state was founded on the notion that the palestinians were non-human, or sub-human
and could just be driven off the land.
The zionists have created millions of stateless palestinian
refugees - just as the nazis created millions of stateless jews.
The zionist state has created the palestinian diaspora
- just as the nazis boosted the jewish diaspora. It is a tragedy that the ending
of the jewish diaspora was responsible for triggering the palestinian diaspora.
The zionists annexe/expropriate i.e. steal land from
palestinians - just like the nazis’ annexed/expropriated land from many peoples
across europe.
The zionists build illegal zionist settlements on
this stolen palestinian land - just as the nazis built nazi homes on stolen
jewish land.
The zionists deport palestinians from their own land
and their own country - just as the nazis deported jews from countries across
europe. Sharon, like most of the zionist leaders before him, is edging closer
to enacting nazi policies of deportation on vast numbers of palestinians.
The zionists have been carrying out a lebensraum policy - just like the nazis. Sharon is trying to force
palestinians out of palestine by impoverishing them, terrorizing them, bulldozing
their homes, or by expropriating their land, in order to allow zionist zealots
to reclaim the land.
The zionists keep palestinians locked up in ghettos
(these days they’re known as refugee camps) - just like the nazis kept jews
in ghettos during the second world.
The zionists force palestinians to carry identity
papers - just as the jews had to carry identification papers in nazi germany.
Zionists arrest, interrogate, torture, and imprison,
suspects without trial - just like the nazis.
The zionists execute alleged palestinian freedom
fighters - just like the nazis.
The zionists are trying to create a religiously
homogenous, racially pure, society - like the nazis.
That the zionist state can get away with pretending that it
is a secular, western, liberal democracy, rather than a crypto-nazi state, is
probably as great a bit of propaganda as any touted by the nazis during the
second world war but whereas the nazis were never able to convince many people
about their propaganda, the zionist state has the power accumulated by the zionist
lobbies in america/brutland and by zionists in the american/brutish media, to
pressure the over-industrialized nations into believing in the fantasy of a
non-racist zionist state.
|
| TERRA FIRM - Issue 1 - - Issue 2 - - Issue 3 - - Issue 4 - - Issue 5 - - Issue 6 - - Issue 7 - - Issue 8 - - Issue 9 - - Issue 10 |
| Issue 11 - - Issue 12 - - Issue 13 - - Issue 14 - - Issue 15 - - Issue 16 - - Issue 17 - - Issue 18 - - Issue 19 - - Issue 20 |
| Issue 21 - - Issue 22 - - Issue 23 - - Issue 24 - - Issue 25 - - Issue 26 - - Issue 27 - - Issue 28 - - Issue 29 - - Issue 30 |
| MUNDI CLUB HOME AND INTRO PAGES - Mundi Home - - Mundi Intro |
| JOURNALS - Terra / Terra Firm / Mappa Mundi / Mundimentalist / Doom Doom Doom & Doom / Special Pubs / Carbonomics |
| TOPICS - Zionism / Earth / Who's Who / FAQs / Planetary News / Bse Epidemic |
| ABOUT THE MUNDI CLUB - Phil & Pol / List of Pubs / Index of Website / Terminology / Contact Us |
| All publications are copyrighted mundi
club © You are welcome to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy. |
We welcome additional
information, comments, or criticisms. Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/ |
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/ |
|