And how did the zionist settlers view such war crimes being perpetrated on those with whom they are supposedly trying to negotiate peace? “Support for sharon has rocketed to a new high for the year - up 19% to 72% - after his offensive in the west bank.”[17]

During the april 2002 invasion of palestine, sharon virtually closed off the country from the rest of the world so the media couldn’t discover the scale of zionists’ slaughter of palestinian freedom fighters and civilians. Julian borger reported, “The Los Angeles Times said in an editorial yesterday that, by barring journalists from Jenin during its offensive, Israel had scored a propaganda own goal. "By aggressively keeping reporters out of the battle zones, in some cases at gunpoint, it has assured rising suspicion and the declining sympathy that invariably accompanies such distrust."”[19] Jessica hodgson pointed out that, “Reporters Sans Frontieres, the international pressure group for journalists, has condemned Israel in the strongest terms for its "grim toll of attacks on press freedom". In an outspoken statement, RSF accused Israel of taking a "racist attitude to the Arab media" and claimed its violations of press freedom were "deliberate". "The policy of the Israeli authorities towards the international media, especially Palestinian journalists, must be condemned for what it is: a massive, deliberate and conscious violation of press freedom and an unprecedented low in the history of Israel," the organisation said. RSF also claimed 10 Arab media offices were "occupied or ransacked" by the Israeli army. "The figures show the brutality of the Israeli army and its discriminatory, even racist attitude towards the Arab media and Palestinian journalists," said RSF. "These have not been blunders but a deliberate policy of hiding from the world the truth of the Israeli army's violence and abuses, which must be clearly condemned and met with international sanctions," it added.”[20] If any information got out to journalists then the zionist army took measures against the journalists, “Midweek, israel deported the correspondent from abu dhabi tv and ransacked his offices.”[21]

Sharon reduced jenin to rubble in exactly the same way he reduced beirut and south lebanon to rubble. Sharon’s nickname amongst zionists is bulldozer and his name was written all over the april 2002 invasion of palestine especially the devastation of jenin. It was reported that the first journalists in the jenin refugee camp described the conditions there as being so bad it was as if it had been hit by an earthquake.[22] Lindsay hillsom said she’d got into three or four palestinian cities after the zionist terrorists had withdrawn and had been shocked at the scale of the destruction.[23] The united nations’ special envoy, terje roed-larsen, condemned the destruction and loss of life as militarily unjustifiable. A few days later he said the devastation in jenin was “beyond belief” and that earth moving equipment was needed to rescue any survivors.[24] The zionists have always had an appalling predilection for demolishing the homes of suspected palestinian freedom fighters and they were busy during the invasion of palestine not merely slaughtering palestinians but demolishing as many homes and buildings as they could - including palestinians’ water supply system, the sewage system, the telephone system, the electricity system, roads, shops, schools, medical centres, and palestinian media centres, etc. The zionist army is the only army in history in which the bulldozer plays as vital a front line role in military operations as tanks.

Thirdly, by reducing palestinian property to rubble, sharon was moving closer to turning palestinian controlled areas into refugee camps, just like those at chatila and sabra, so that economic deprivation, and homelessness, would force more and more palestinians to leave their own country. This would enable fundamentalist religious settlers to take over the land and build massive, military style, housing complexes, using american aid, to ensure further zionist expansionism.

Sharon wants to force palestinians out of palestine either by impoverishing them, terrorizing them, bulldozing their homes, or by expropriating their land, so that zionist zealots can reclaim the land that, three thousand years ago, god told the jews was theirs. Sharon is an extremist religious nutter who is promoting a nazi lebensraum policy and is edging closer to enacting nazi policies of deportation on vast numbers of palestinians. It was truly amazing to discover that the jewish god promotes nazi policies.

Secondly, when sharon was housing minister in the zionist government he embarked on a huge number of illegal zionist settlements. His primary aim was demolishing as many palestinian homes, and stealing as much land, as he could in order to promote the zionists’ lebensraum policy. He has done exactly the same since he became the zionists’ fuhrer. What could possibly demonstrate more clearly his disinterest in negotiating with palestinians, let alone handing back any land stolen from palestinians, or giving them a state, than that he has spent his life increasing the number of illegal zionist settlements. Suzanne goldenberg has pointed out that a freeze on new settlements .. “is anathema for Sharon who, for three decades, has been the patron of the Jewish enclaves in the West Bank and Gaza, which are considered illegal under international law.”[25]

Michael ignatieff makes the valid point that the zionists have never supported the idea of a palestinian state - the most they would agree to is a bantustan. He believes that in the past the zionist state had two options: either go for peace by trying to build up the palestinian national authority so that palestinians could prevent attacks on the zionist state or go for a lebensraum policy, “But making the Authority work was incompatible with the parallel policy of establishing settlements. (Zionist) Settlements cut Palestine into pieces, and sent a message to the population that they would never actually have a viable state of their own. Settlement policy acted against the Israeli state's vital security interests, and so Israel will have to choose between its own survival and the survival of the settlements.”[26] The zionists have nothing to contribute to peace negotiations. They just want to continue forcing palestinians out of palestine.

Thirdly, in september 2000, sharon deliberately triggered off the second palestinian intifada by trespassing on the haram al-sharif mosque in jerusalem - even though he knew palestinians would retaliate and that this would lead to the loss of zionist lives, because he wanted peace negotiations to collapse under the pressure of mutual hatred.

Fourthly, once in power, ariel bin sharon has continually provoked palestinians through the construction of new settlements, state assassinations, and the demolition of the homes of suspected palestinian freedom fighters. He has deliberately provoked palestinians into retaliation because he could then use the deaths of zionist colonialists as an excuse to send in the tanks/bulldozers to crush the palestinian people, thereby making peace negotiations even less possible. He has deliberately targeted the palestinian national authority to prevent it from taking action against suicide bombers because, if it took action, he would have no excuse to invade the country, demolish its infrastructure, reoccupy its land, and force the palestinians off the land given to the jews by someone they refer to as god.

Fifthly, sharon imposed pre-conditions on the palestinians to make it impossible for them to get to the negotiating table, “The israeli prime minister disclosed that he was putting together a negotiating team in readiness for talks with the palestinians but said bluntly that all violence must stop before negotiations could start.”[27]

After the re-occupation of palestine, there was some international pressure on sharon to forge a peace agreement but, as usual, sharon only agreed to this under the condition he was allowed to make it impossible for the palestinians to agree to the negotiations, “Ariel sharon spelt out his conditions for peace, yesterday, including a reformed palestinian authority.”[28]

It wasn’t difficult for sharon to scupper these peace moves. All he did was intensify his provocations of the palestinians because the deaths of more zionists enabled him to dismiss peace efforts. Politically, sharon has been feeding off the blood of his own people.

It was not a coincidence that a couple of days after arab countries had reached an agreement on support for the saudi peace plan, ariel bin sharon sent in his tanks and bulldozers to slaughter, terrorize, and impoverish, the palestinians. He had to take drastic measures to scupper this peace plan which was winning widescale support from many countries around the world.

In the middle of december 2001, the zionist army surrounded yasser arafat’s home, “Israel parked its tanks on palestinian leader yasser arafat’s doorsteps in a dramatic show of military might yesterday. Palestinians branded his virtual house arrest as “an official declaration” of war, marking a new crisis in the middle east. Tanks rolled to within 100 yards of arafat’s hq in ramallah a day after 10 israelis died in a bus ambush. Israelis hold him responsible.”[33]

By the middle of january the zionist army was back again, “Israeli tanks were 30 yards from yasser arafat’s hq yesterday. He has been blamed for an attack by a gunman who killed six at an israeli bar mitzvah on thursday. Arafat has been in the west bank city of ramallah since israel ordered military retaliation to suicide bomb attacks in jerusalem and haifa which killed 23. Asked if arafat was under house arrest, israel said he could “move around his compound.”[34]

In february 2002, sharon refused to allow arafat to travel around palestine because he was allegedly organizing suicide bombings. Sharon then imprisoned arafat in his home. Towards the end of march 2002 he refused to allow arafat to travel abroad to peace negotiations - what a surprise! The zionists’ reoccupation of palestine started when sharon sent in his tanks to demolish arafat’s compound and slaughter his body guards, “Yasser arafat was trapped in his west bank headquarters last night after it was seized by israeli troops. The palestinian leader was confined to one floor of his office building, surrounded by the ruins of his main power base. Palestinian officials said phone links and electricity to arafat’s bunker were cut off at nightfall.”[35]

After arafat had been totally surrounded by the zionist army pointing their american made, and american financed, weapons at him and without any means of communication with the outside world, the absurd religious nutters in the sharon government denounced him for organizing the latest suicide bombings. How could arafat have communicated with the outside world when, basically, the zionists had stuffed him up the barrel of a zionist tank? A few days after the start of the occupation, sharon revealed his ultimate goals when he offered arafat the chance to leave his own country, “Israeli premier ariel sharon yesterday offered besieged palestinian leader yasser arafat a one way ticket out of the country.”[36] Sharon wanted to deport arafat firstly because the ziono-american governments could then try to pick a new quisling palestinian leader who could be forced into accepting a meaningless peace agreement which would ratify zionists’ reoccupation of the country. And, secondly, because if sharon could get away with deporting arafat then it wouldn’t be long before he would start deporting alleged terrorists and then the rest of the palestinian people. Arafat heroically stuck out the siege and was eventually freed from his illegal imprisonment by the crypto-nazi zionists. No matter what else may be said about him, he is surely one of the most courageous leaders of our time.[37]

There will never be peace in the middle east until sharon has been forced to leave palestine. There will never be peace in the middle east until the united nations arrests sharon and puts him on trial for organizing the mass murders in the chatilla and sabra refugee camps.

It is not unexpected that conventional american/brutish politicians have allowed zionists to dictate their foreign policies. What is surprising is that this attitude is also held by ‘new labour’, and by many of those on the left of the political spectrum as well as by third world aid organizations. When mcblair became leader of the labour party he insisted that new labour should abandon it pro-palestinian sympathies in favour of pro-semitism. As a consequence, tens of thousands of party activists who’d supported the palestinians knew that if they wanted to get on in the labour party’s hierarchy, and perhaps even within the labour government, then they would have to abandon such views. The left are also increasingly dominated by zionist ideas (for example new statesman) - only the hard left continue to denounce sharon as a crypto-nazi and racist. Third world luvvies have provided little aid either to palestinian refugees living amongst the rubble of palestinian towns or to those living in camps in other countries around the middle east. It would be interesting to know just how much aid that comic relief have provided for palestinian children around the world. The left and third world organizations have never organized an anti-zionist apartheid movement as they did against the white apartheid south african government. The anti-apartheid movement has never organized a boycott of zionist goods or of zionists in sporting events. If south africa carried out any of the policies that sharon is currently carrying out against the palestinians, the anti-apartheid movement would have been holding mass rallies and mass sit-ins of the zionist embassy. The double standards of the left wing of the political spectrum are as appalling as those on the right.

After the end of the war, iraq was in a desperate financial plight. Saddam regarded kuwait as a reward for his decade-long, faithful service to america - fighting a proxy american war with iran. He massed troops on the border with kuwait and waited several weeks to gauge the american government’s response. The response was one of indifference. Saddam took this to mean the american government would condone the invasion. But, after the invasion took place, the american government suddenly changed its mind thereby leaving saddam stranded in kuwait. Within a matter of weeks he went from great american hero to the world’s worst demon - this demonization being grossly amplified by the zionist dominated american/brutish media.

What saddam failed to calculate about the international politics of his invasion of kuwait was firstly, the power of the zionist lobbies in america/brutland to persuade politicians and the public that the invasion should be resisted. Secondly, and far more decisively, the zionist government played its trump card and issued a warning to the american and brutish governments that if they did not take action against saddam then the zionist army would. Throughout the 1980s the zionist government had been warning the american government not to arm saddam hussein because it feared the build up of the iraqi army. The zionists regarded iraq as a dangerous threat to their hegemony of the region.[39] They feared that with the money he would obtain from selling kuwaiti oil, he would rebuild his armed forces to rival those of the zionists. A zionist attack on iraq would obviously have triggered off a widescale conflict across the middle east, so america and brutland were thus forced into fighting a proxy zionist war against kuwait.[40] The zionists were thrilled. Not merely was iraq about to be militarily pulverized, but america and brutland would suffer all the casualties whilst the zionists could sit on the sidelines reaping the political profits.[41]

The americans armed and financed the zionist terrorists who reoccupied palestine, slaughtered innocent palestinian civilians, and demolished palestinian homes, factories, water supply system, sewage disposal system, electricity system, schools, medical centres, media centres, etc. The zionists slaughtered palestinians with american weapons and american munitions. They even used american made f16 fighter planes to attack unarmed people - people they’re supposed to be negotiating with. Given his role in financing, arming, and promoting, zionist terrorism, it was not surprising that mcbush absurdly blamed arafat, who’d renounced violence years ago, for sharon’s invasion of palestine.[42]

Sharon didn’t just ignore mcbush. As leader of god’s chosen people, he went out of his way to humiliate the president of the united states. After mcbush’s second public demand for a zionist withdraw from palestine, sharon went on a tour of his front line terrorists in order to reassure them he wouldn’t be taking any notice of mcbush. After mcbush’s third demand for a zionist withdrawal, sharon took the media along with him to make sure the whole world could see him defying mcbush by telling his troops there would be no early withdrawal. On april 15th it was reported that sharon stated he would not end the occupation “until he was ready”.[47] Mcbush’s humiliation was further compounded by the fact that his secretary of state, colin powell, had been sent on a peace mission to the middle east but he’d had to spend a week flying in circles around the sahara, waiting for the worst of the slaughter to abate, before visiting jerusalem.

Sharon’s humiliation of mcbush was complete when, a fortnight later, mcbush resorted to making excuses to explain why sharon still hadn’t obeyed him. White house spokesman ari fleischer told reporters that mcbush even believed that sharon was "A man of peace" - but reporters didn’t seem to understand that the piece was ‘palestine’. On april 22nd 2002, three weeks after the start of the invasion, sharon announced, “The first phase of military operations in palestine has come to an end.”[48] Weeks later mcbush was still demanding the zionists’ withdrawal from the occupied areas. After mcbush’s humiliation, nobody could seriously believe that he, nor powell, carries any weight in bringing peace to the area. What use could mcbush be in negotiations between palestinians and zionists after such humiliations?

Perhaps sharon’s greatest insult of mcbush occurred in september 2001, when he denounced mcbush as a nazi appeaser. The prelude to this gross insult is worth recalling as it provides a clear insight into sharon’s insanity. After the p*ny bombings, sharon claimed that arafat was the zionists’ bin laden, “Israel’s right wing prime minister ariel sharon was accused of fuelling the tension by calling palestinian leader yasser arafat, “Israel’s osama bin laden.”[51] Sharon has always regarded arafat as a terrorist especially after 1988 when arafat renounced the use of violence and recognized the zionists’ state’s right to exist.

A few days later, ariel bin sharon likened bin laden to adolf hitler so that, in effect, he was creating a moral equivalence between yasser arafat and adolf hitler. With his head spinning around with historical analogies to long dead politicians, sharon then launched a wild attack on mcbush accusing him of being neville chamberlain, "Don't repeat the terrible mistake of 1938 when the enlightened democracies of Europe decided to sacrifice Czechoslovakia for a convenient temporary solution. Do not try to placate the Arabs at our expense ... Israel will not be Czechoslovakia. Israel will fight terror.”[52] Basil brush would be proud of the rant, boom, boom.

Let’s start at the beginning of these gross historical analogies in order to show the quagmire of sharon’s insanity. In sharon’s mind, osama bin laden was hitler, and arafat was bin laden, which meant that arafat was also hitler.[53] If arafat was hitler this meant, at least in sharon’s mind, that the palestinian authority was the moral, political, and military, equivalent of the third reich whilst the zionist state in palestine was the moral, political, and military, equivalent to the poor vulnerable, defenceless, czechoslovakian government of the 1930s. So, in sharon’s increasingly psychotic mind, it was obvious that if the zionist state in palestine was czechoslavakia, this could mean only that america was britain in the 1930s and that george mcbush was neville chamberlain. It’s all too easy to understand sharon - once you’ve learnt to think like a lunatic. Sharon’s helter skelter of logical deductions from his initial moral equivalence between arafat and bin laden, had turned into a reality defying worldview of catastrophically insane proportions. It has to be asked how anyone with the slightest degree of common sense could liken yasser arafat, the leader of a people without any military assets such as an army, navy, or airforce, to adolf hitler who commanded a massive military force during the third reich? What is more, how could any sane person equate the zionist state in palestine which is armed with nuclear, chemical, and biological, weapons, to an unarmed country such as czechoslavakia in the 1930s? That these beliefs should be held by the leader of a country possessing nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, is not merely obscene but frightening. Ariel bin sharon is an unrepentant mass murderer who believes that the jewish god legitimizes everything he does. He’s criminally insane and ought to be imprisoned in a top security insane asylum before he triggers off the third world war. Sharon’s denunciation of arafat for being hitler and his denunciation of mcbush for being neville chamberlain shows that in his mind the identities of long dead bogeymen have become completely muddled up with contemporary political figures. How do you negotiate with someone who is still fighting the second world war?

Mcbush was none too chuffed at being labelled the moral equivalent of neville chamberlain, “American relations with Israel plunged to their lowest point in a decade yesterday when the White House denounced as "unacceptable" statements by the Israeli prime minister comparing the US coalition-building in the Arab world to British appeasement of the Nazis in the 1930s. The Bush administration was reported to be furious with Mr Sharon's actions, and the White House spokesman, Ari Fleischer, told journalists that the president felt personally affronted by the comparison to Neville Chamberlain and the discredited policies of appeasement in the run up to the second world war. In a blunt response, Mr Fleischer said: "The president believes that these remarks are unacceptable. Israel could have no better or stronger friend that the United States and no better friend that President Bush."”[54]

Sharon even refused to apologize for his insult of the president of the united states. It shows what little power mcbush has over sharon that he was too gutless to demand an apology, “A chastened Ariel Sharon has moved swiftly to mend a rupture with Washington after his invocation of a Nazi comparison triggered the most heated diplomatic exchange between America and Israel in a decade. In a hurriedly arranged telephone conversation with the US Secretary of State, Colin Powell, Sharon stopped short of a direct apology to President George W. Bush for remarks that accused Washington of selling out Israel to win favour in the Arab world for its war coalition.”[55] It’s a wonder sharon didn’t make mcbush apologise for pushing him into an outbreak of his explosive personality disorder. The president’s public relations’ team quickly pushed the incident out of the media headlines to minimize the president’s embarrassment but a rubicund had been passed. Ariel bin sharon now knew he could get away with publicly denouncing, and defying, the president of the united states. Mcbush was left trying to cover up his humiliation by pretending that two good friends had made up their differences - as if sharon regards mcbush with anything other than contempt.

It wasn’t long before sharon was once again humiliating mcbush. The following month, october 2001, sharon defied mcbush by launching a short invasion of palestine. Suzanne goldenberg stated, “Ariel Sharon further signalled his contempt yesterday for the US diplomatic strategy of mending fences with the Arab world, by launching the heaviest Israeli military offensive since the start of the Palestinian uprising last year.”[56] This opinion was shared by julian borger, “The Bush administration has known for months that its control over the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, is tenuous at best. Yesterday's raid on Beit Rima was a neon-bright indicator of Mr Sharon's complete disregard for Mr Bush's opinions. The usual tools of US diplomacy in the region now look flimsy. The secretary of state, Colin Powell, has been planning for several weeks to make a landmark policy speech laying out a clear blueprint for Israeli-Palestinian cohabitation, including the creation of a viable Palestinian state, with a share of Jerusalem as its capital. "That can be one of the threats held over Sharon's head," said Judith Kipper of the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington. "But in the end it is just a speech. It is just words, and it is not going to have much effect on Sharon."”[57]

So, given sharon’s dismissal of mcbush’s demands for a withdrawal from palestine, the question has to be asked, ‘How many more times is sharon going to humiliate the so-called leader of the free world before he gets his come-uppance?’

Jonathon steele draws the most obvious conclusion about sharon’s humiliation of mcbush and america’s sudden adoption of zionist foreign policies, although few other commentators are brave enough to talk about such a conclusion, “The Israeli prime minister's humiliating refusal to heed the White House's call last month for an immediate halt to Israel's West Bank incursions should have prompted a debate on whether Bush or Sharon makes US foreign policy, she argued. Instead, the leaders of most American Jewish organisations sided with Sharon and were pleased when Bush backed down.”[58]

The congress has a disproportionately high number of zionists. The zionist lobby is the most powerful in the country as regards america’s foreign policies. The american media is dominated by jews - especially hollywood. The mcbush administration contains a number of jews - the president’s press secretary and his deputy secretary of state, paul wolfowitz, who is a zionist. And yet, remarkably, there are those who scoff at the idea of zionists controlling the american government, “Washington's leverage on Mr Sharon is further diminished by the leverage he has on Washington. There is a significant constituency outside and within the Bush administration which is echoing the Israeli prime minister's line - that his struggle with Mr Arafat is directly equivalent to the US war on Osama bin Laden. At a meeting of the House of Representatives' international relations committee yesterday, Mr Powell was showered with praise for his general handling of the terrorism crisis, but repeatedly assailed for his policy on Israel. Gary Ackerman, a Democratic congressman from New York, denounced US demands for Israeli restraint as hypocrisy. "We are telling them to do as we say, not as we do," he said. That view is shared by a circle of right-wingers grouped around the deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz. They believe that US security is being compromised by the administration's concern about maintaining the support of the Arab world. In their eyes, this is preventing the Pentagon from eliminating Saddam Hussein as a threat, and it is preventing a comprehensive campaign against terrorism which would also target Palestinian and Lebanese groups.”[59] The role of the mcbush administration is to constantly fulfill the demands of the zionist lobby.

Poor old mcbush simply hasn’t worked out that if he tries to punish the zionists for insulting and humiliating him i.e. by cutting off the money the zionist lobby is stealing from american livestock, then the zionists will remove him from office. Julian borger has pointed out that, “The US gives $3bn in aid each year to Israel, $1bn of which represents military assistance. Paradoxically, the subsidy is not a useful lever: cutting it would be politically perilous. In Jewish-American and conservative circles, President Bush's father still has not been forgiven for merely threatening to withdraw loan guarantees nine years ago - a factor in his 1992 election defeat.”[60]

As far as foreign affairs are concerned, the real president of the united states is ariel bin sharon and rest of his racist religious nutters in occupied palestine. Mcbush is just the virtual president, the dim-witted plonker who does his bidding. Mcbush hasn’t quite sussed out that it isn’t just a coincidence that new york is the jewish people’s second homeland; the home of the united nations; and the world’s financial centre - it’s also currently being run by a jew, “Billionaire tycoon michael bloomberg became mayor of new york yesterday, after spending a record $50 million on his election campaign.”[61] Bloomberg succeeded the pro-semitic bigot rudolph gulliano. If osama manages to hit new york again, ariel bin sharon is all too likely to start denouncing mcbush for not doing enough to protect the jews in their new york homeland. If he then sends in his armed forces to set up a buffer zone between them and the rest of america then perhaps the american president might start to realize he’s bitten off more than he can chew. If sharon then starts claiming that new york is mentioned 23 times in the torah and, three thousand years ago, was given to the jews by god herself, then mcbush would be wise to invite yasser around for a cup of tea for a discussion about how to get crypto-nazis off your front lawn.

Michael ignatieff has demanded that the american government make a choice between being the funders of the zionist state and the region’s peacemaker, “The Americans now face a historic choice. For 50 years, they have played the double game of both guaranteeing Israel's security and serving as honest broker in the region. This game can't go on. Either America gave a tacit green light to the Israeli operation, or it tried to restrain Sharon and failed. Either way, now that the Powell peace mission has failed, the American president looks ridiculous or devious, or both.”[62] What he doesn’t seem to appreciate is that it is zionists who are taking decisions in the american government and they certainly have no intention of promoting peace in the middle east.

And, once again, the garden gnomes condemned yasser arafat, who’d renounced violence, for organizing palestinian retaliation even though the zionists had surrounded his house with tanks, murdered his security guards, stopped all food, water, and electricity, and more or less stuffed him down the barrel of one of their tanks. Ariel bin sharon believes there will be peace in the middle east - but only when everyone in the region speaks fluent yiddish and knows the torah off by heart - although without the right blood this won’t qualify anyone to become jewish..

Quite how anyone could expect degenerate brutish politicians and the brutish media to say anything significant about events in palestine is beyond comprehension. Sharon and the zionist lobby in brutland have told the mcblair government that terrorism is something which is committed only by palestinians rather than by the terrorist state in palestine. As will be noted later, they persuaded the mcblair government to go around spouting extremist zionist propaganda. They have also ordered the brutish media to stop using the word ‘palestine’ and to stop using the phrase state terrorism rather than ‘targeted assassinations’. Brutland’s obsequiousness to racist zionists is a deplorable spectacle.

The reason that cohen powell made little effort to be even handed in his dealings between the demented mass murderer, ariel bin sharon, and the noble man of peace yasser ‘winston’ arafat who, like nelson mandella, is one of the great statesmen of our time, was because he had to appease his america audience back home where the zionists in the mcbush administration, zionist congressmen, the zionist lobby, and the zionist media, were demonstrating their support for racism in palestine. Indeed the country seemed on the verge of renaming itself the united zionist states of america whose capital would be in illegally occupied jerusalem. On april 15th 2002, zionists held a large rally in washington demanding that america supports the zionists’ slaughter of defenceless palestinians.

George mcbush had originally supported the zionist invasion of palestine; he later demanded the zionists withdraw from palestine; and then, when he realized ariel bin sharon wasn’t taking the slightest bit of notice of him, started back peddling. According to a newsnight reporter, whilst powell was in palestine, mcbush never said a word in support of powell’s peace efforts.[66] Even worse, mcbush’s jewish spokesperson aril fleischer, pointed out that it had been colin powell’s decision to meet yasser ‘winston’ arafat - the implication being that the president was still obeying sharon’s order to regard arafat as a terrorist. Newsnight reported that benjamin netanhayu was also in washington spreading a whispering campaign about the need to shift the focus from palestine to iraq - the reporter pointing out that netanhayu made ariel bin sharon “look like a moderate”. (This is the politician who was interviewed by david frost and jeremy paxman in the most reverential tones - neither of them asking him difficult or embarrassing questions). Simon tisdall argued, “Mr Sharon and his advisers clearly understood the international pressures that led Mr Bush to change tack two weeks ago and demand an Israeli withdrawal. But he also seems to have understood that, domestically, Mr Bush would be unable - and unwilling - to punish Israel if it did not comply. His judgment has been borne out by events, and not least by a sudden upsurge in pro-Israeli statements and demonstrations in Washington. It was an initiative that could not succeed because Mr Powell did not have the wholehearted backing of his boss - and Mr Sharon knew it.”[67]

Powell stayed in palestine for a week or so. He condemned yasser arafat for the zionist’s invasion of palestine, “Despite Mr Sharon's continuing public defiance of an ally which gives Israel some $3bn (£2bn) in aid annually, Mr Powell reserved his strongest words for Mr Arafat. He said he was dismayed at the Palestinian leader's failure to halt violence, and that the Palestinian Authority had to work to end "terrorism".”[68] But at least powell was brave enough to meet arafat a couple of times - signalling that the zionists were not totally in control of american foreign policy i.e. that the american government would not push arafat into political oblivion and demand his replacement with a new, more compliant, leader. As if to pretend that americans still had some control left over their own foreign policy, powell even asked the zionists to give arafat more room to move. But the zionists weren’t interested in humanitarian considerations, “Mr Powell said he urged Israel to ease its confinement of Yasser Arafat and to allow the Palestinian leader to communicate with the outside world. But as the secretary of state left, a furious Mr Arafat raged at Israel for confining him to his Ramallah headquarters. "I have to ask the whole world, I have to ask President Bush, I have to ask the United Nations, is this acceptable that I can't go outside from this door?" he said.”[69] Once again it has to be suggested that, on the whole, not even the former apartheid south african government had treated its prisoners with such contempt and with such indifference to international law.

Powell then flew back to america. Most commentators felt it necessary to record his humiliation at the failure of his visit. Peter beaumont and julian borger pointed out, “American efforts to broker a new ceasefire in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict ended in humiliation for the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, yesterday. He was forced to return home with neither a truce nor any evidence that Israel is ending its siege of Palestinian cities in the West Bank. As the secretary of state flew home, the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, continued to launch new military incursions into Palestinian villages and neighbourhoods, including several in Jerusalem itself. The latest incursions came despite repeated calls from Mr Bush and Mr Powell for Israel to "withdraw immediately" from Palestinian cities.”[70] Simon Tisdall joined in, “Mr Powell failed to achieve the ceasefire he had initially said was his primary aim. He failed to secure Israeli agreement to end the occupation of large parts of the West Bank and to withdraw its troops. Prime minister Ariel Sharon's verbal undertaking to pull back "in a week or so" was almost laughably vague - and is an undertaking that is in any case unlikely to survive the next Palestinian "terrorist" outrage.”[71] Powell had been sent on a hopeless mission to create the illusion that george mcbush was the leader of the world’s superpower and that all governments around the world obeyed his orders. What powell’s visit showed was that the acting president of the united zionist states of america is ariel bin sharon. Sharon gives the orders, the zionist lobby then ensures that the president and congress carry out these orders.

By april 2002, it was transparent that the zionists were clearly in command in washington and clearly in control of american foreign policy, “The campaign for an all-out attack on Iraq continues in full swing with none of the congressional opposition which marked the Gulf war a decade ago.”[73] The zionists had managed to push mcbush back into line when he gave a speech outlining the zionist foreign policy he would be pursuing over the next few years, “In an aggressive, back-to-basics speech in Lexington, Virginia, Mr Bush restated and revived some established themes. Back on the agenda again, for instance, was the "axis of evil" that he first revealed to a startled world last January. He did not single out Iraq, Iran and North Korea by name this time. But when he described the "mad ambitions" of a "small number of outlaw regimes" that possess nuclear weapons, he was presumably not referring to Britain or France.”[74] The fact that iran and iraq are the enemies of the zionist state in palestine rather than the united states of america showed who was directing america’s foreign policies.

The zionist pressure to deal not merely with saddam but with iran started increasing. At the beginning of april mcbush stated, “Iran’s arms shipments and support for terror fuel the fire of conflict in the middle east, and it must stop.””[75] Towards the end of may 2002 during mcbush’s tour of europe, complaints began to surface about the russian government helping the iranians to build a nuclear powered reactor - a protest which has similarities with zionist protests in the 1980s against iraq’s nuclear power capabilities. The zionists and americans want to end iran’s civil nuclear power programme in case it is used to produce nuclear weapons. But if they do, they’ll also have to act against iran’s chemical and biological industries which could produce equally devastating weapons - which will mean basically de-industrializing iran in the same way as they have done to iraq. Jonathan steele was mocking about the pro-semitic bigots in the american administration collecting the evidence needed to justify another proxy zionist attack on countries which have yet to submit to zionist dominance, “John Bolton, the state department's most hawkish official, is taken seriously when he "names" countries with biological weapons programmes which the US claims the right to target with military strikes. No one contrasts his purported expertise with the fact that, after seven months, the FBI has failed to discover the whereabouts of the people or the laboratories in the US which produced and mailed anthrax-coated letters last autumn. If the administration is so ignorant about events on its own doorstep, why should anyone believe it knows what is going on in labs in Iraq, Iran or Cuba?”[76]

Jonathan steele has detected a pro-zionist mccarthyite streak running through mainstream american political opinion, “To enforce this abandonment of reasoned argument in the name of a witch-hunt against terrorists, a strange alliance of evangelical Christians in Congress has come together with the leaders of American Jewish organisations who normally support the Democratic party. "We live in a culture where there is a diminishing tolerance of dissent," commented Abe Brumberg, long-time editor of Problems of Communism, the Soviet-era journal which was funded by the US government. He drew my attention to a column by Frank Rich in the New York Times. The piece reported that America's foremost Jewish newspaper, Forward, was fielding subscription cancellations for accepting an ad from Jews Against the Occupation. Mainstream papers are also being targeted. "Our press is not being muzzled," Rich was careful to write, "but the dictates of what constitutes politically correct conversation about the Middle East are being tightened to the point that American leaders of all stripes increasingly seem to be in a contest to see who can pander the most to American Jews."”[77]

The public mood in new york, the next area which zionists are hoping to clear of all non-jews, is even more extreme and intransigent, “What a sad place New York City has become. A vibrant, disputatious town with a worldwide reputation for loud voices and strongly expressed opinions is tip-toeing around in whispers. Grief over the casualties of the twin towers massacre is not the reason (those wounds are slowly healing), but a stifling conformity which muzzles public discourse on US foreign policy, the war on terrorism and Israel.”[78] The majority of new york jews are completely behind ariel sharon’s tactic of treating arafat as a terrorist in order to prevent negotiations with him thereby allowing the zionists to push even more palestinians out of palestine.

American support for the zionist state is now so overwhelming that americans are becoming increasingly disenchanted with europeans who have greater sympathies for palestinians. Many americans believe that europeans’ failure to give total support to ariel bin sharon is proof that the continent is still rife with anti-semitism. Such is the scale of the bigotry in america. There are undoubtedly small, localized, pockets of anti-semitism in europe but in the establishment, pro-semitism is rife.

With zionists on the wart, the likelihood is that they will use the campaign to consolidate their reoccupation of palestine, launch the american military into a second proxy zionist war against iraq, and then use it to punish syria and iran. In other words, the zionists will push the american government into fighting proxy zionist wars. They will force more and more palestinians to leave palestine and, if possible, deport as many as they can. This will lead to a new wave of palestinian refugees and to more terrorist attacks. The zionists will try to use the american military to defend themselves from the terrorists they have just created through their belligerent tactics. In other words, the american military will become engaged in a real war against terrorists only once the zionists have used to american military to create more palestinian, iranian and syrian freedom fighters. Basically sharon will use the tactics that worked so well for him in palestine, on the whole of the middle east.

It is unlikely that many european countries will support zionist inspired attacks on iraq, syria, and iran, because of their closer links to the moslem world. This will allow the zionist dominated, american wart to take even more unilateral action with fewer constraints from either european or arab governments. Don plesch believes that once the american military has established itself in iraq then an attack on iran becomes much more feasible, “Turkey’s prime minister, bulent ecevit, continues to oppose publicly the idea of attacking iraq. But there is every reason to believe that the u.s. has already offered control of iraq’s northern oilfields to turkey in return for its support in afghanistan and iraq. In 1995, 35,000 turkish troops attacked the kurds in northern iraq, an act ignored by the british and us governments who had made much of their protection of the kurds from saddam hussein. But oil is not the only, or even the biggest, lever that the US has over turkey. It also funds half of its imf and world bank loans. Once the u.s. has bases in iraq as well as in afghanistan, military operations against iran, next on the list of “axis of evil” countries becomes more viable.”[79] Military action against more moslem countries will further radicalize moslem opinion in the middle east. It might even trigger off a wave of moslem retaliation. At worse, the zionist dominated american wart could push america into a war against the moslem world.

The evidence suggests that sharon wants to provoke a war in the middle east between the allies and the moslem world firstly, because it will be american, and possibly allied military personnel, who will die rather than zionists; secondly, because the zionists have nuclear, chemical, and biological, weapons to wipe out vast numbers of moslems; thirdly, because such a slaughter will enable him to annexe more and more land for extremist zionist settlers; and, finally, because it is under conditions of a third world war that sharon will be able to deport the remaining palestinians left in palestine. In october 2001 the mundi club stated, “Many zionist fundamentalists such as ariel sharon would love to expel all palestinians from their own country if only world opinion would tolerate such a policy.” A zionist inspired, american backed, war against moslems would shift world opinion against moslems to make the zionists’ lebensraum policy acceptable.

As the zionist controlled, american backed, wart unfolds it is likely the zionists will push the american government even further in the direction of unilateralism which will almost invariably mean it will become even more aggressive in defending and promoting its economic and political interests against the rest of the world whether this might be over the climate, global trade, or weapons’ treaties, etc. American unilateralism is almost certainly a consequence of the zionists’ increasing grip over the american congress and the presidency. Zionists’ contempt for the world (and the Earth) is increasingly infecting american politics. However, of much greater concern in the short term is that the zionists dictating american foreign policy will force the country into military action against a number of moslem states.

If the zionists push the american government into a war against moslems in which the lives of american soldiers will be lost, then it will be all too clear that the zionists are not merely dictating america’s foreign policies but using american military might as a vehicle for global domination. During the 1990s the zionist lobby in the united states, used america’s economic and political power to extract billions of dollars from countries around the world in compensation for the ridiculous pantomime called the jewish holocaust.[81] The zionists would never have been able to force these countries to cough up such vast sums of money without american economic muscle, and yet the american government seemed perfectly willing to allow the zionists to use its power for their own ends. It’s bad enough when zionists use american economic power to extort money from countries around the world, but it is beyond the pale when they use american military power solely in order to attack zionists’ enemies and promote zionist expansionism in the middle east and around the world.

Most non-jewish americans have no financial or economic interests in the zionist state in palestine. They are not receiving any military benefits from the crypto-nazi zionist state. On the contrary, it’s a constant financial drain on their resources because it causes far more military conflicts than it suppresses. Far from being a steadfast ally helping america to control a volatile region of the world, it is the prime cause of the region’s volatility. It is a constant liability as it drags america into successive military conflicts - as well as being a source of considerable political embarrassment when zionists engage in their frequent bouts of mass butchery. If non-jewish americans want to give away their money to racist zionists, and even lay down their lives for these nazis, that is their choice but it does seem an extraordinarily dippy sacrifice - especially given americans’ insular view of the world. This situation is all too reminiscent of livestock being milked by the landowning elite. America is the land of the free, a freedom loving democracy, but it then undermines this achievement by supporting ariel bin sharon, a mass murderer; zionist nazis like rehavam ze’evi; the racism of the zionist state; zionists’ reoccupation of palestine; and, zionist expansionism against iran, iraq, syria, and other moslem countries. Since the second world war, americans have enjoyed the freedoms available to them in america but they have never been willing to foster such freedoms for other peoples around the world. On the contrary, they have been willing to terrorize the rest of the world to protect their domestic freedoms. It is ironic that a tiny state in the middle east has managed to infiltrate the american political system and is now using it to reinforce these earlier american tendencies.

The zionists cover up these realities with their global propaganda e.g. that the zionist state is a western, secular, freedom-loving, liberal democracy; that it abides by international law; and that ariel bin sharon is a peacemaker. The world is powerless to force the zionists to abide by international law and to arrest sharon.

The issue at stake in the palestinian-zionist conflict is simple - the zionists will not abide by united nations resolutions and hand over to palestinians the land that is theirs by international law. Until they do the palestinians are justified in continuing their freedom fight. The editor of the observer newspaper has stated, “Both the US and Britain must now demand that Israel abides by UN resolutions requiring a retreat to its 1967 borders, including the withdrawal from East Jerusalem and the Old City and the evacuation of settlements on Palestinian land. While insisting there is no tolerance of Palestinian extremists who believe that Israel should cease to exist, Mr Blair must tell Ariel Sharon that it took it successive British governments 30 years to learn in Northern Ireland - you cannot defeat the bombers in your midst only with armies and assassination. You have to use justice and negotiation, too. As the Arab proverb has it: 'There is no point swatting flies if you have not drained the swamp.’”[82] If the zionists and the americans refuse to abide by united nations’ resolutions, then why should any other country such as iraq?

Over the last decade or so, the allies have often argued that the zionists are more likely to negotiate with the palestinians if they are in a position of strength. So the americans have provided zionists with overwhelming strength in comparison to the palestinians. But, as soon as these racists feel stronger, they increase their provocations of palestinians to make it impossible for the palestinians to negotiate. The allies should stop making the zionists stronger because all it has done is encourage them to become more and more violent. Indeed, the only way of increasing the prospects for peace is by stripping the zionists of much of their military power. The allies should bomb the zionists until they stop slaughtering palestinians and agree to peace negotiations. If need be, the allies should bomb zionist settlers if they refuse to leave the land they have stolen from palestinians.

With zionist terrorists on board, america’s wart has become a global terrorist organization. The zionist state is not merely a good partner of the american government in the wart - basically ariel bin sharon has become the president of the united zionist states of america and is running the american government’s foreign policies. Mcbush is just the virtual president who occasionally forgets his status and tries to tell his master what to do instead of taking orders. America is not merely regurgitating zionist propaganda it is doing everything the zionists want. That the world’s sole military superpower is being pushed around by the government of a tiny country in the middle east which it cannot control even though it arms and finances this government is remarkable. Brutland does everything that zionist dominated america wants. This is the real axis of evil currently dominating the world and pushing it towards the abyss.

America’s current course of action is not going to do anything to make the world a better and safer place. Almost unbeknownst to its own population, the american government has been usurped by zionist, religiously devout crackpot, warmongers. Ariel bin sharon looks more like the president of the united states than george mcbush. The zionists’ aggressive religious ideology is increasingly permeating the american administration. Zionists contempt for the world, which they believe is inhabited solely by people impersonating adolf hitler, is becoming more and more of a feature of the american administration. What is often referred to as american unilateralism is yet more evidence of zionization, zionists’ dominance of the american government. Who would have thought the republican party would have become such devoted zionists? Who would have thought that the brutish government would have adopted sharon’s pro-zionist extremism? Sooner or later the zionist domination of american foreign policy is going to lead the so-called free world into a disaster with the moslem world. The zionists are wreaking havoc in palestine with their attempt to create a racially pure, religious devout, zionist state - what is going to happen when they start doing the same to the middle east?