Forty years on from the eichmann trial and much to my surprise considering the validity of hannah's propositions, the views of the zionists’ chief prosecutor that eichmann was a sadistic monster and a pivotal influence in the slaughter of the jews during the second world war, has become conventional wisdom. For example, the bbc routinely describes eichmann as “the architect of the holocaust” - a notion that hannah would have regarded as utterly preposterous. The zionists argue that his apparent insignificance in the third reich's hierarchy was a cunning tactic to disguise his great power and position of authority! To zionists it doesn’t seem to matter a jot that the more blame they heap on eichmann, the less there is for adolf.

It is unfortunate that hannah’s views on eichmann seem to be slipping into posterity and her name is rarely mentioned these days. I suspect the rise of zionist ideology and the decline of interest in hannah's ideas are not unconnected events. I feel a little guilty for not having done more to promote her ideas - not the best way for an avid student of hers to repay his intellectual debts. So, for the moment, the best i can do is to dedicate this work to her. Perhaps she would have condemned it had she been alive - but perhaps less so than most others.

During mcbush’s presidential campaign right wing conservatives had been talking, as they so often do, about the prospects for american isolationism - the retreat from the problems of the world. But the steel tariffs could hardly been seen as part of an isolationist tendency given that america now has troops not merely in saudi arabia and afghanistan but in various central asian republics and, perhaps, in the near future, iraq.

It was much easier to see the trade sanctions on steel as being part of the american government’s unilateralist policies. The mcbush administration has been increasingly unilateralist over a wide range of policies from climate change to international disarmament treaties. America no longer sees itself as one amongst equals which must abide by the club’s rules but as the world’s sole superpower which can do whatever it wants even if it damages other countries’ interests. The anti-globalization analysis has thus failed to encompass the american government’s recent political developments.

The anti-globalization thesis also seems negligent insomuch it has failed to notice a new globalization process at work i.e. the rise of zionists to a position where they are effectively controlling not merely america’s congress but the american adminsitration and thus america’s foreign policies. In effect, they have attained world domination. This is not what could be called a fashionable thesis but the evidence for it is considerable even if politically correct, anti-globalizers refuse to acknowledge it. The zionists’ success in winning the approval of the american government, congress, and the public, for their april 2002 invasion of a foreign country, palestine, and their success in co-opting themselves onto the allies’ war against terrorism (hereinafter referred to as the wart), shows that zionists have become the dominant partner in their relationship with the world’s sole military superpower. If globalization seemed to be secondary to americanization, then americanization has rapidly become secondary to zionization.

Theoretically, it is plausible to categorize zionists’ domination over the world’s superpower as being part of the globalization thesis - in so much as zionists have become so powerful they need to be recognized as a global power. However, the fact is that zionization is different from globalization. It might be retorted that if zionization is the dominant phenomenon of the times then how does this fit into the notion of america’s current unilateralist course. Although there is a blatant contradiction between globalization and americanization, in this work it is suggested there is no contradiction between zionization and american unilateralism because the cause of america’s increasing unilateralism is zionization - zionists’ dominance of the american government. The zionist state is renown for doing whatever it wants - whatever the rest of the world might think about what it does. Zionists have a total contempt for the world because, sixty years ago, it nearly allowed them to perish. Zionists also hate the united nations because its current borders are designated as illegal. As zionists’ grip over the american government has increased, zionists’ contempt for the rest of the world and the united nations has become an increasingly pervasive feature of american foreign policy. What is happening is easy to understand. The zionist state in palestine is a rogue state because of its refusal to abide by united nations’ resolutions. In the process of taking over the american government to protect the zionist state’s criminal and illegal status, the zionists have pushed the american government into becoming a rogue state itself. What an increasing number of commentators are calling american unilateralism is nothing of the kind - the phenomenon to which it refers is better understood as a manifestation of zionization. In the past, american foreign policy has often led to military-political disasters but with zionists directing the american government/military to attack their enemies, it is likely to become even more disastrous. It is not a coincidence that the countries and groups which america currently defines as its enemies, also happen to be the main enemies of the zionist state in palestine. The fact that america is lining up attacks on iraq, syria, and iran, all of which could easily be carried out without the support of european or arabic governments, is indicative not of globalization nor unilateralism but zionization.

After the first world war, the nazis accused jews of conspiring to achieve world domination. After the second world war such accusations became almost taboo, the sole fantasies of psychologically disturbed, neo-nazis. As far as is known, this is the first work to explore the accusation from a radical perspective. It is suspected that, over the last few decades, as zionists' take over of american politics has increased dramatically, they have deliberately associated the idea of zionist world domination with nazism to discourage people from taking such an hypothesis seriously.

This work does not attempt to promote fascism or nazism - although it is doubtful that such a declaration will make the slightest difference to the opinions of all sorts of leftie/zionist/liberal bigots who might come across this work. It is nevertheless true. The underlying motivation of this work is an attempt to uncover the core of the bipeds’ power system which is decimating the Planet - an issue about which leftie/zionist/liberal bigots know nothing. However, if an analysis of the world’s power structure necessitates borrowing explanatory tools from right wing sources the mundi club is perfectly willing to do so. For an important question which needs to be asked here is, who is the bigot? Right wingers who hate jews and try to stir up racial hatred between racial groups, or, left wingers and the politically correct brigade who refuse to think about, let alone explore, zionists' influence on american and brutish politics, despite the overwhelming evidence that there is something fundamentally disturbing going on here e.g. american and brutish politicians spouting extremist zionist propaganda; condoning zionists’ vile oppression of the palestinian people; whilst ignoring the zionists in the media who are stirring up white’s hatred of moslems. There is nothing whatsoever that i can do to stop ariel ‘the bulldozer’ sharon from going into jenin and flattening buildings containing innocent men, women, and children, (and then, to compound this war crime, sickeningly stopping rescue efforts from saving any survivors). But i can retaliate against crypto-nazi zionists by suggesting that websites such as jewwatch.com may provide some of the information needed to combat such disgustingly evil, war criminals. As soon as the nutter ariel bin sharon was elected to power everyone knew the middle east would end up in bloodshed because he’s an intransigent, war-mongering, racist. In 1933 politically aware people knew there would be trouble after adolf was elected and, decades later, everyone knew there was going to be trouble when ariel bin sharon was elected. What adolf did in organizing krystallnacht, ariel ‘the bulldozer’ sharon did in bulldozing jenin. The bulldozing of jenin was a far greater crime than krystallnacht. Why do zionist appeasers (which includes bush and blair) try and pretend that sharon, a well known mass murderer, has no responsibility for what has happened since he came into power? That he is innocent of all wrong doing?

What this work discusses is the phenomenal rise of the zionists to world domination. It has been estimated that in 1946 .. “608,000 jews resided within the borders of mandate palestine.”[1] and that, “Jews had acquired by purchase six to eight per cent of the total land area of palestine.. ”[2] By 1948 when the zionists created the jewish state, they had expropriated 77% of palestine. Within less than twenty years, the six days war, in 1967, showed that the zionist state had become the regional superpower. The zionist influence over the american government grew significantly during the 1970s and 1980s until, in 1990, it was able to force the American government into a zionist proxy war against iraq. During the 1990s the zionist lobby gained control over the american congress. During the bush administration, for the first time, it could be argued that the zionists have managed to take over the presidency and thus over the american military. By 2002 the head of the zionist state was outrightly defying the president of the united states and was determining american foreign policies. This surely is a spectacular rise to power. Extrapolating this accumulation of power over the next twenty years suggests some extremely worrying developments.

Most mundi club publications have always been far too controversial to be discussed even in what is laughably called radical circles, let alone in the drearily conventional world of the andi pandi ghandis, but it has to be suspected this work will be evaded with even greater horror than usual. If i should be found accidentally buried under a huge pile of rubble, or crushed under the wheels of a bulldozer (the zionist state’s favourite form of state assassination) i would suggest that explanations for such a tragedy along the lines of, ‘the multi-storey car park just fell on top of him’, or ‘i suddenly lost control of the bulldozer’ be treated with scepticism.

This publication contains:

The two articles were originally published in tf22 ‘The Terrorist War against the Poor’. These have been substantially rewritten. The first essay was written during the zionists’ reoccupation of palestine. It was mcbush’s capitulation to ariel bin sharon over this reoccupation that confirmed suspicions about zionists’ dominance of the american government. This revelation necessitated a significant revision of the ideas expressed, a mere six months ago, in tf22. When mcbush applauded the zionists’ invasion of palestine as being the second phase of the wart, he was basically confessing that the zionists had co-opted themselves onto the war against terrorism. It is now transparent that the zionists’ invasion of washington has been just as successful as their invasion of palestine.

The normal reaction to sharon’s humiliation of mcbush was voiced by a female rabbi friend of a guardian journalist, jonathan steele, “The Israeli prime minister's humiliating refusal to heed the White House's call last month for an immediate halt to Israel's West Bank incursions should have prompted a debate on whether Bush or Sharon makes US foreign policy, she argued.”[3] Those who dismiss such a debate are crypto-nazi zionist appeasers.