Intervention at the Working Group on Minorities, United Nation Human
Rights Commission, Geneva
The
Commission on Human Rights
Sub-Commission on
Prevention of
Discrimination and Protection of Minorities
Fiftieth Session
Working Group on Minorities
Fourth Session
Geneva, May 25-29, 1998
Geneva, May 26, 1998
Thank you Mr. Chairman,
I am Rakesh Chhetri and
represent the Centre for Protection of Minorities and Against Racism and
Discrimination in Bhutan, now exiled in Nepal. I congratulate you on your
re-election. I present my intervention under Agenda No. 3 (a) (i), At the
national level and 3 (a) (iii) At the International level.
INTRODUCTION
I would like to draw your
kind attention to the plight of more than 94,000 Nepali speaking minority
Lhotshampa Bhutanese refugees who are forced to live in the refugee camps in
eastern Nepal and another 20,000 Bhutanese refugees (Lhotshampas) living
outside camps in Nepal and India.
Bhutan is a
multi-religious, multi-cultural and multi-linguistic society. It is a nation
of immigrants and does not have the indigenous people. However, the
government is on record to state that “Pluralism is only practical for a
larger country where a diversity of customs, traditions and culture enriches
that nation. A small country like Bhutan cannot afford the luxury of such
diversity which may impede the growth of social harmony and unity among its
people”. This violates Article 1 (1) of the UN Declaration on Minorities.
This attitude and mentality of my country`s government has become a great
source of tension among the various minorities and between the government
and the minorities. There are ten different and distinct ethnic groups and
minorities in Bhutan.
The Ngalung ethnic
group, also widely called as Drukpas, forming the ruling community
and the majority government, live mostly in the north-western region. They
practise Drukpa Kargyupa school of Mahayana Buddhism, speak
Dzongkha language and wear robe like dresses called `Gho’ for men and `Kira’
for women. King and all the high Government Officials belong to this group.
They are the politically and economically dominant ethnic group. They belong
to Tibeto-mongoloid stock and have migrated from Tibet.
The second ethnic group is
Sharchhop (meaning easterners) minority, who inhabit in eastern and
central districts and practice Nyingmapa sect of Mahayana Buddhism
and belongs to Tibeto-Burman ancestry. They speak Tsangla, Kurteop, Kheng
and Brokpa dialects. They were supposedly migrated from North-east
India.
The third ethnic group
Lhotshampa (meaning Southern Bhutanese) minority live in southern
foothill districts, speak Nepali language, practice mostly Hinduism and
migrated from Nepal, Darjeeling and Sikkim in India.
All three ethnic groups
migrated to Bhutan at different points of time in history, but before the
exodus of British from India in 1947. There are other minorities and ethnic
groups having their own distinct characteristics in terms of language
culture, religious practices etc. They are Tibetans, Doyas, Khengs,
Adivashis, Brokpas Mangdepas and Kurteopas. In terms of religion
and faith, Bhutanese people practise Hinduism, Christianity, Drukpa Kargyupa
and Nyingmapa sects of Buddhism and Animism. These ethnic groups for
centuries have inhabited in separate regions of Bhutan. Each ethnic group
lives in a particular region. For example, the Lhotshampas live in southern
foothills, the Sharchhops in north-eastern districts, Brokpas in northern
highlands and Kurteopas in high north-east, Khengs in central parts,
Bumthangpas in upper middle parts, Drukpas or Ngalungs in North-western
parts of Bhutan. They all live in cultural separation from one another in
different territorial regions.
PROBLEMS
Denationalization of
Lhotshampas
Our country’s government
has implemented a discriminatory Citizenship Act, 1985 targeting against the
Lhotshampa minorities. This Act has been responsible for denationalization
of more than 120,000 Lhotshampa minorities. They were made ‘stateless’ over
night by the government by manipulating various laws. The government
confiscated the citizenship certificates of hundreds of Lhotshampa
minorities. They were forcefully evicted as non-citizens and are now
compelled to live as refugees in Nepal and India.
The Lhotshampa refugees
constitute around twenty percent of the country’s total population of
700,000. A large number of Lhotshampa women and children are deprived of
their husband’s and father’s citizenship by the government. The government
has violated Article 1 (2) of the UN Declaration on Minorities by adopting
two standard of legislative measures on citizenship.
Discrimination in
employment and education
After the peaceful
pro-democracy demonstration in 1990, our country’s government as a means of
punishment to the Lhotshampas introduced a discriminatory rule requiring
all Lhotshampa citizens to produce a No Objection Certificates (NOCs)
or Police Clearance certificates from the police stating that none of
their kith and kin has been involved in the peaceful pro-human rights and
pro-democratic movement of September-October, 1990. Every Lhotshampa
is required to produce NOCs for getting admission of their children into
schools, for processing promotion in civil service, for issuing passport,
for seeking scholarship, for sitting in the civil service examinations and
applying for jobs in the government service etc. This certificate is
discriminatorily implemented against Lhotshampa in violation of Article 1
(2) of the UN Declaration on Minorities.
Violation of Cultural
Rights
The government is pursuing
a programme to make Bhutan culturally homogenous through a policy it calls,
’One Nation One People.’ The ‘One Nation One People’ policy of the
government stresses the need for a Drukpa national identity, but does not
envision forging this identity to encompass the diversity of nations’
cultures. The Lhotshampas have no right to wear
their dresses. They are forced to wear the Drukpa dresses. The government
violates the Lhotshampas right to enjoy their own culture. The names of
places reflecting their traditional culture have been replaced by Drukpa
sounding names. It has imposed a forceful assimilationistic policy called `Driglam
Namzha`. The Driglam Namzha policy is destroying the cultural identities of
Lhotshampa, Sharchhop and other minorities, directly violating Article 2 (1)
of the UN Declaration on Minorities. We respect the political integration,
but denounce the cultural and religious assimilation.
Violation of Religious
Rights
Christianity is banned by
the law of National Assembly (Parliament). The Christians are denied the
right to practise their religion. The government does not allow them to
establish their churches. Even the prayer in their private chapel in their
home is subjected to the government scrutiny. Like wise, the Sharchhops are
also denied the right to practise their Nyingmapa Buddhist faith. Their
monks (priests) are being arrested and imprisoned. One of them was recently
shot dead by the District Administrator. The government violates Article 2
(1) of the UN Declaration on Minorities.
Discriminatory Language
Policy
Under the Driglam Namzha,
the government lifted Nepali language spoken by the Lhotshampas from the
school curriculum in February 1989. It banned the teaching of Nepali
language in the schools in southern Bhutan that remained in school
curriculum for last over thirty five years. Nepali is the mother tongue of
southern Lhotshampas. Teaching of Nepali had begun in 1950's in the southern
Bhutan schools much before Dzonkha, language, mother tongue of Drukpas was
introduced in the school curriculum in late sixties. The government violates
Articles 2(1), 4 (3) and (4) of the UN declaration on Minorities.
Economic rights
The Lhotshampas and
Sharchhops are denied equal right to employment and equal access to the
trade, business and industrial activities.
They do not have access to higher posts in army, police,
bureaucracy and in the government. The representation of the minorities such
as Brokpas and Doyas, in the bureaucracy is nil. Other minorities such as
Tibetans, Adivashis, Khengs, Mangdeps have less than one percent
representation in the bureaucracy. There is not a single minister from these
ethnic groups. Likewise, they have not been appointed in the judiciary. This
violates the Articles 2 (2) and 4 (5) of the UN declaration on Minorities.
Others
The Lhotshampas and the
Sharchhops are discriminatorily prevented from participation in the national
decisions effecting them, thus violating their rights under Article 5(1) of
the UN Declaration on Minorities.
Mr. Rongthong Kuenley Dorji,
the main minority opposition leader and the Chairman of the United Front for
Democracy in Bhutan was arrested by the Indian police on April 18, 1997 and
since then is imprisoned in Tihar jail in New Delhi. He has not committed
any criminal offence in India or Bhutan.
Mr. Chairman, I have some
recommendation for the solution of our problems.
RECOMMENDATIONS
-
I request the Chairman of
Working Group on Minorities to take necessary steps to encourage and open
dialogue between my country’s government and the opposition refugee
leaders in Nepal for a realistic solution of Bhutanese refugee problems in
Nepal.
-
I request the Chairman to
pay a field visit to the refugee camps in Nepal to investigate and assess
the ground realities.
-
I suggest the
forthcoming World Conference on Racism also to address the minority
problems and involve the minorities in preparatory meetings and shaping of
the agenda.
-
I also suggest the
holding of a World Conference on Minority Rights to address the minority
problems.
-
I suggest the creation of
a United Nations High Commissioner for Refugee fund for refugees
minorities to enable them to travel to Geneva and contribute to the
deliberations and discussions in the Working Group on Minorities.
-
I suggest my country’s
government to draft and adopt a national Constitution guaranteeing and
protecting the rights of minorities and promoting diversities. I also
suggest the government to repeal the Citizenship Act, 1985, restore the
National Law on Citizenship, 1958 and take necessary measures for early
repatriation of Bhutanese refugees.
-
I suggest that my
country’s government to provide open space for functioning of civil
society.
Rakesh Chhetri
Executive Director
Centre for Protection of
Minorities and Against
Racism and Discrimination
in Bhutan
Mailing Address in exile:
GPO Box No. 3485, Kathmandu, Nepal
Tel. No. 00977-1-529 106Fax
No. 00977-1-549 284
|