The second lot of racists are far more difficult to combat. They are jews professing to be americans putting america first but who give their undivided loyalty to the jews-only state in palestine. These israeli traitors in the zionist dominated media, in the zionist lobby, in virtually all american political parties, in congress, and in the bush administration, know that the zionist state in palestine is a jews-only state, with jews-only laws, jews-only rights, jews-only property ownership, jews-only roads running between jews-only settlements/towns/cities, jews-only immigration, jews-only employment, jews-only marriages, jews-only religion, jews-only cemeteries, jews-only international laws, jews-only taboos, and openly racist jewish politicians, etc. Such blatant racism does nothing to deter them from giving full support the jews-only state. The israeli traitors duped america into a proxy zionist war against iraq that was inimical to american interests - just as they are trying to dupe america into another zionist proxy war against iran which will have even more deleterious consequences for america. Another remarkable characteristic of these jewish racists is their pretence at being anti-racists. In fact they are what could be called anti-racist racists. They have cleverly contrived to bring about a situation where anyone pointing out the blatantly racist nature of the jews-only state in palestine is deemed to be anti-semitic i.e. a racist, and in recent times, under america’s new zionist-inspired anti-terrorism laws, a potential terrorist.

The third group of racists are americans who have been duped by the torrent of zionist propaganda into believing that the jews-only state in palestine is a secular, western, multi-cultural, liberal, democracy - despite all the evidence to the contrary. It is, after all, theoretically inconceivable to support the jews-only state and not be a racist.

The fourth group of racists are the so-called christian evangelists. Zionists have duped them into believing that the second coming of the messiah can be hastened by ethnically cleansing palestinians from palestine. So-called christian evangelists encourage the jews-only state to be as racist as possible, including demands for the ethnic cleansing of palestinians, to precipitate the reappearance of the messiah ­ even though the messiah would condemn anyone promoting such a policy and would find the jews-only state in palestine utterly reprehensible. They are racists because they politically support, finance, and arm, zionists wishing to create a racially pure, jews-only state in palestine.

The main criticism of this fear of a new race war is that such a fear is redundant - the race war began over half a century ago when zionists created the jews-only state in palestine. Ever since then, jews have been trying to win support for the jews-only state in palestine and every convert has boosted the jewish race war against the moslem world. Over the decades, zionists have won so much support from successive american administrations in their racist war against palestinians and the moslem world that the american state has also become racist ­ the same could also be said of the british government. In september 2001, moslem fundamentalists retaliated against the america government’s racist foreign policies. This was the first time moslems had been able to retaliate against the american government’s complicity in zionists’ ethnic cleansing of palestinians. Not surprisingly, the zionist dominated bush administration responded firstly, by launching a proxy zionist war against iraq and, secondly, by adopting all the enemies of the jews-only state as its own enemies - even though they posed no threat to america.

The laws that the bush administration has implemented to combat terrorism were designed to be non-racist but their implementation, often under the direct control of israeli traitors in the bush administration, has been explicitly racist in targeting moslems. Zionists in america (and britain) are willing to sacrifice the freedoms that americans (and britons) have enjoyed for centuries simply in order to use these countries to pursue their race war against moslems and the moslem world. If anyone points out that the zionists are pursuing a race war against arabs/moslems, zionists immediately denounce them for being racists!

The fear of provoking a race war against jews-only racists is also overblown given that most extreme right wing groups in america (and britain) focus their race hatred almost exclusively on moslems rather than on jews. It is almost as if zionists have some hidden influence guiding right wing groups to focus their animosities solely on moslems. Indeed, in britain the british national party, the most well known fascist party in the country, is known to have jews in its ranks but no moslems.

The anti-racist racists who argue it is wrong to accuse zionists of being israeli traitors and who fear a race war usually promote the idea that race is irrelevant because it is only a social construct. But even if race is a social construct, it becomes relevant to the extent that people believe in it. And the people who believe in race are those who support the jews-only state in palestine. There are many so-called americans, so-called christians, who support the jews-only state in palestine as if it was just another civilized western country. If anyone wants to appreciate the sheer horror of jews-only racism all they have to do is put themselves in the shoes of a palestinian or an iraqi. Only then will such people see jews-only racism for what it really is - the true successor of nazism.

Firstly, it assumes that the threat to america’s democracy comes mainly from rural, christian evangelists in america’s red states. But these so called christians are basically zionist trolls. Zionists have converted them into uncritical supporters of zionism. The leaders of the so-called christian evangelists were wooed and bribed by zionists to convert their christian flocks to follow the zionist agenda. The problem is not christian fundamentalists but the zionists who have turned them into christian evangelists who support jews-only racism.

Secondly, the blue states support the war against terrorism i.e. the jews-only race war against moslems, just as much as the red states. There was virtually no difference between republicans and democrats over the war against iraq and the introduction of ant-terrorist laws curbing civil liberties in america. There is virtually no difference between these two parties concerning further wars against iran and syria. The reason for this is that both parties are so dominated by likud loving zionists they have in effect become international branches of the likud party. The likudnic democratic party is only slightly less racist and imperialistic than the likudnic republican party. Whereas, in the past america has been inviolable whilst the rest of the world has endured horrendous wars, in this jews-only race war even the american constitution is no longer safe.

Thirdly, the issue at stake is not fascism but racism. The introduction of fascism is usually triggered by internal, domestic problems such as the threat of widespread disorder or even civil war. There are no such domestic problems in america. The curbing of civil liberties has nothing whatsoever to do with domestic discontent or civil war. What is happening is that israeli traitors in the american media, in the zionist lobby, and the american political system, encouraged the adoption of anti-terrorist to target moslems in order to foster racial hatred of moslems.

Fascism is almost invariably a domestic problem whereas racism is by nature more of an international phenomenon. The onset of fascist governments rarely develops into imperialist adventures. Franco is a good case in point and also, to a lesser extent given his minor overseas adventures, mussolini. In america, however, the bush administration has embarked upon a number of proxy zionist race wars against moslem countries. Zionists have been successful in getting america to fight their racist wars against the moslem world. The more that zionists can stir up race hatred against moslems in america, the greater the public support they can win for further american wars against the moslem world. America has embarked on a zionist-induced race war against moslems around the world including those in america. It is not afflicted by a minor domestic fascist problem.

America’s race wars are a zionist importation from the jews-only state in palestine. Zionism and the jews-only state cannot be described as being merely fascistic. In so much as the zionist state is defined as a state solely for jews it has to be racist to prevent palestinians not merely from becoming a majority in the state but from remaining in palestine. The jews-only state is also intent on expansionism and this can happen only through racist wars against neighbouring moslem countries. America is becoming more and more racist both domestically towards its own citizens, and internationally, by pursuing zionists’ racist wars against the moslem world. This is not a surprising political development given zionist domination of america’s political system. Outside the western world, increasing numbers of people despise the racism of the bush administration’s domestic and foreign policies. The only people who refuse to acknowledge this racism are america’s israeli traitors, who regard it as just normal anti-semitic publicity, and americans who have been indoctrinated by decades of zionist propaganda. If americans do not take action against the israeli traitors in their midst they are going to find themselves pursuing more zionist proxy wars against syria, lebanon, and iran, and living in an increasingly racist society. This is leading to the country’s moral, political, and economic bankruptcy. Zionism has poisoned palestine; it is poisoning america and it will poison the world.

There is little doubt that christians have a huge clout in american elections but whether they have greater control over the republican party, congress, and the presidency, than the zionist lobby is an entirely different matter. There are an increasing number of examples revealing why america is dominated not by so-called christian evangelists but by zionists.

Firstly, some american christian evangelists have become so indoctrinated by zionists they give absolute loyalty to the jews-only state in palestine rather than to their own country. Raimondo highlighted a speech by kay arthur, a popular "Christian Zionist" author and minister, at the convention of the national religious broadcasters, "Perhaps the most startling moment of the morning was an appearance by popular Christian Zionist author, Kay Arthur of Precepts Ministries. 'I love America,' Arthur said, her voice quivering with emotion. 'But if it came to a choice between Israel and America, I would stand with Israel.' While the crowd applauded tepidly ..."" (Justin Raimondo ‘Putting Israel First’ http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=0 March 6th 2005). Such is the power of zionism over americans it can persuade even patriotic americans to publicly announce they are traitors to their own country.

Secondly, the political weakness of the christian evangelists is blatant for all to see in their failure to turn america into a christian state. If they were anything like as powerful as they are reputed to be they would have converted america into a christian state. And yet their efforts to do this have been blocked by the superior power of the zionist lobby which insists, for obvious reasons, on a separation of church and state ­ a separation which they support only in america not in palestine where judaism dominates the jews-only state. America is supposedly a christian nation and yet the 3% of its population which is jewish has managed to protect the separation of church and state. In america, the constitutional separation of church and state symbolizes the dominant position of the zionist lobby over christian evangelism.

Thirdly, if the bush administration is dominated by evangelical christians, why is it that american foreign policies have never focussed on protecting christians and promoting christian interests? Neither the bush administration nor america’s so-called christian evangelists have protested to the jews-only state in palestine over the appalling treatment of the significant proportion of palestinians living in the jews-only state who are christian. "Hanna Nasser, Mayor of Bethlehem, today launched an appeal to world public opinion to do something for the Christian population of the city forced to leave because of high levels of unemployment caused by a downturn in religious tourism. The mayor was quoted in the Palestinian daily al-Quds as saying that the Israeli security barrier is damaging the local tourist industry. Not only are Palestinian lands being expropriated to build the wall, but Israel has de facto annexed Rachel’s Tomb. What's more, with land communication between Jerusalem and Bethlehem made more difficult fewer pilgrims are coming. In Jerusalem Israeli daily Maariv recently revealed that two buildings in the Old City sold by the Greek Orthodox Church were in fact purchased by Jewish nationalists who want to judaise the Old City. Using foreigners as apparent buyers, Jewish nationalists paid millions of dollars to get their hands on the Imperial and Petra Hotels near Jaffa Gate, not far from Old City’s Jewish Quarter." (Bethlehem Mayor urges help for Christians’ http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=2814 March 18th 2005); "Children and adults are expected to fail in their attempt to ride from Bethlehem to Jerusalem on donkeys, as they try to commemorate Jesus' entry into Jerusalem this Palm Sunday. The idea for the donkey ride, explains Rishmawi, came from Christian Palestinian children who were fascinated by the story of a Bethlehem man who could just get on a donkey and go to Jerusalem. "Neither children nor adults from Bethlehem are allowed to go to Jerusalem," explains George S. Rishmawi who is organising the ride. "Of course you can apply for a permit to go, but 99.9 percent of the permits are denied." Even with permits, there is no guarantee people will be allowed to pass. "So we are going to walk from Manger Square at the Church of the Nativity, and we will be trying to get to Jerusalem as Jesus did." (Children ask why they can't enter Jerusalem on a donkey’ http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/content/news_syndication/article_050318donkey.shtml March 18th 2005); "In a push for peace, Israel is erecting a wall in East Jerusalem to separate Palestinian and Israeli territories. "The wall is going to cut off east Jerusalem to the Palestinians," said Tarek Abuata of the Holy Land Christian Ecumenical Foundation. "Basically, people who live in Bethlehem, for example - which is three miles away from east Jerusalem - will not be able to access the city." Mother Agapia Stephanopoulos, who lives in Israel and directs the Orthodox School of Bethany, is currently in the United States to tell Congress the wall is making it difficult to run her school. The wall, she explained, is making it difficult for locals to practice Christianity. "Because of the wall," she said, "a Christian from Jerusalem - a local Palestinian Christian - cannot go to the Church of Nativity in Bethlehem and vice versa."" (Josh Montez ‘Wall Hampers Christians in the Holy Land’ http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0036131.cfm April 7, 2005); "The venerable Rep. Henry Hyde is a staunch supporter of Israel, but he is also a prominent Catholic layman known for telling the truth. He did so two weeks ago to Israeli Vice Premier Shimon Peres. He made clear how unhappy he was that Israel's government had ignored his previous protests about the destruction of the Christian community in the Holy Land. At a closed-door session of the House International Relations Committee that he heads, Hyde told Peres that Israeli security practices ''in the center of Christianity's most holy places'' are "turning them into a military zone." Peres conceded to Hyde these are hard times for Christians in the Holy Land, but predictably blamed their troubles on the Palestinian Arabs." (Robert Novak ‘Hyde fights for overlooked Christians’ http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak18.html April 18, 2005).

Fourthly, similarly the foreign policies of the bush administration have done little to protect christians in iraq. "One question the war promoters don't want to hear asked, because they don't want to face up to the answer, is this: "Are Christian Iraqis better off today since we decided to build a new Iraq through force of arms?" The answer is plainly no. Sure, there are only 800,000 Christians living in Iraq, but under Saddam Hussein they were free to practice their religion. Tariq Aziz, a Christian, served in Saddam Hussein's cabinet as foreign minister - something that would never happen in Saudi Arabia, Israel, or any other Middle Eastern country. Today, the Christian churches in Iraq are under attack and Christians are no longer safe. Many Christians have been forced to flee Iraq and migrate to Syria. It's strange that the human rights advocates in the U.S. Congress have expressed no concern for the persecution now going on against Christians in Iraq. Both the Sunni and the Shi'ite Muslims support the attacks on Christians. In fact, persecuting Christians is one of the few areas in which they agree ­ the other being the removal of all foreign forces from Iraqi soil." (Rep. Ron Paul ‘Who's Better Off?’ http://www.antiwar.com/paul/?articleid=5485 April 7, 2005).

Fifthly, another significant example of dechristianized zionists’ political weakness is their failure to protest about the massacres of christians in east timor. As stephen zunes has pointed out, "Interestingly, even though the East Timor situation involved a predominantly Muslim country conquering, occupying, and terrorizing a predominantly Christian country, virtually no protests arose from the Islamaphobic Christian Right." (Stephen Zunes ‘The Influence of the Christian Right on U.S. Middle East Policy’ Foreign Policy In Focus www.fpif.org June 2004). The reason for the absence of protests about this issue is that zionists had no interests in east timor so they didn’t bother to channel goyims’ energies over this issue. Dechristianized zionists are not organized enough to launch such a campaign for themselves.

Sixthly, the american congress has passed an anti-semitism bill which makes it increasingly difficult for christians to criticize the jews-only state in palestine.

Finally, american christians did not protest about the zionist desecration of a christian church in jerusalem when zionists arrested vanunu.

In order to understand what is at stake, it is necessary to appreciate the recent, fundamental changes in american christian theology. Over the last couple of decades, christian fundamentalists have morphed into christian evangelists. There is a huge theological gulf between these two types of christianity - even though the vast majority of christians themselves seem to have failed to appreciate that such changes have taken place. Christian fundamentalists are people who believe in a literal translation of the bible. However, christian evangelists have become convinced by the theory of dispensationalism which, concocted in the 1840s, has only the most tenuous biblical foundations. In other words, christian evangelists still think of themselves as fundamentalists but have failed to appreciate they are no longer fundamentalists because there is no biblical basis to dispensationalism. Dispensationalism had been wallowing around in the christian backwaters for nearly a century and a half until the mid 1970s when jewish neocons spotted its huge political potential for the jews-only state in palestine and set out to popularize the theory amongst christians. Jewish neocons coaxed christian fundamentalist leaders into supporting dispensationalism and, in turn, these leaders converted christian fundamentalists into what eventually is now known as christian evangelism.

The phrase ‘christian evangelism’, however, is far from being an accurate description of this religious phenomenon. Such christians are not christians ­ they are much more accurately defined as dechristianized zionists. This is because firstly, christian evangelism would never have become so popular without the financial, political, and media, assistance of the zionist neocons. Secondly, when zionists persuaded christians to convert from a literal translation of the bible to a theory of the return of the so-called messiah which has no basis in the bible, they also changed christians’ theological understanding of god. Evangelical christians ignore the traditional christian god of love and forgiveness for all people (even non christians) in favour of the judaic god of revenge and exclusivity. In their sermons, christian evangelical leaders spew out the anger, racism, and wroth of the old testament jewish god. Christians have ditched their christian god for the sake of the war-mongering jewish god, the master of the universe. In addition, whilst most non fundamentalist christians focus primarily upon the new testament, dechristianized zionists are solely concerned with the old testament.

Teresa whitehurst has pointed out the increasing intolerance of dechristianized zionists. In doing so she highlights the profound difference between fundamentalists and evangelists, "Intolerance has become a standard "Christian" teaching in conservative circles and is now a badge of honor." Intolerance .. "is now the most readily observable hallmark of the virtuous and courageous conservative Christian." She concludes, "Because intolerance is now a virtue to be acquired rather than a vice to be cast away, there is nothing that you or I can say to awaken the conscience of conservative Christians. They're too far gone, for their beliefs have changed radically over the last few years. They worship a different God than the one we grew up with; perhaps it's more accurate to say that they worship the Old Testament God, without the moderating influence of Jesus, who's considered symbolic and sweet and nice-but nobody whose teachings must be obeyed." (Dr. Teresa Whitehurst ‘The Intolerance of Christian Conservatives: Making Tolerance a Sin; Intolerance a Virtue’ http://www.counterpunch.org/whitehurst01252005.html January 25, 2005). It is not surprising that dechristianized zionists have become as intolerant as zionists.

It is not possible to regard christian evangelists as christians when they believe in the judaic god of war, support the racism and supremacism of the jews-only state, and promote dispensationalism which has no roots in the bible. In effect, when christians changed from fundamentalism to dispensationalism, they discarded their christianity and simply became another brand of zionism.

The neocons are responsible for zionizing christian fundamentalists into dechristianized zionists. They have persuaded christians into supporting the jews-only state in palestine thereby making themselves collaborators in jews-only racism. They have turned christians into their political puppets. For the last couple of decades, the zionists have been reaping huge political rewards from the increasingly extreme support which dechristianized zionists have given to the jews-only state in palestine. These christians are nothing more than zionist trolls who have put their power at the disposal of zionism. Zionists’ dominance of america’s foreign policy is a by-product of their control over america’s domestic politics.

It is highly likely that over the next decade or so, dechristianized zionists are going to campaign for the abolition of the separation of church and state. Most jews have publicly supported this separation for many generations. It is possible, however, that the neocons may not find such a campaign objectionable even though it could have adverse effects on american jews. On the contrary, these likud loving, jewish racists are likely to regard such a campaign as being extremely beneficial to the jews-only state.

As a result of their adoption of dispensationalism, dechristianized zionists have come to believe that in order to hasten the return of the messiah, all palestinians must be ousted from the sacred land of the jews-only god. In order to win divine salvation dechristianized zionists have got to promote the ethnic cleansing of palestinians from their homeland. However, another condition that needs to be met before the return of the messiah is that all jews must return to palestine. This means that dechristianized zionists have got to coax, or push, all american jews back to the jews-only state in palestine. Over the next decade or so, if dechristianized zionists become more and more powerful, then american jews are going to face the increasing prospect of being forcibly expelled to the jews-only state in palestine.

To date, the debate over the jews-only state in palestine has primary been about whether it is politically feasible to push palestinians out of palestine and how quickly this could be accomplished. Dechristianized zionists have made clear their support for the ethnic cleansing of palestinians. Various leaders in the jews-only state, almost invariably former terrorists and war criminals, have attempted to make life so intolerable for the palestinians that they will be forced to leave their own country. Many american jews have said nothing about the jews-only state’s appalling treatment of palestinians for fear that their protests might hinder or deter such a policy. But now american jewish lovers of jews-only terrorism against the palestinians face the prospect of suffering the same fate as those they despise so much. The rise of dechristianized zionists is bringing the expulsion of the palestinians from palestine ever closer but it is also increasing the threat of american jews being expelled to palestine. From the perspective of dechristianized zionists, there is no point in expelling palestinians from palestine unless they also expel jews from america.