Terra Firm no.26: Essays on Zionism, Zionization, the Second Zionist Proxy War against Iraq, and the Global Zionist Conspiracy for World Domination.

American Policies toward Syria prove it is a Zionist Occupied Government.

Published March 13th 2005.

America is pursuing another proxy zionist foreign policy in syria just as it did in iraq. A leading lebanese politician is killed in a bombing and, without any evidence, america immediately blames syria. It insists that syria should abide by united nations’ resolution 1559 which requires all foreign forces to leave the country.

However, whilst america insists that syria should leave lebanon, it refuses to demand the withdrawal of the zionist army occupying the sheba farms area of lebanon.

America also fails to abide by a un resolution demanding that the zionist state should end its occupation of syria’s golan heights, "Syria's ultimate objective is, of course, to free its own Golan Heights from Israeli control. The Golan was occupied during the Israeli-Arab war of 1967 and was illegally annexed by Israel in 1981 in violation of UN Security Council resolution 497." (Ramzy Baroud ‘Reining in Syria on Behalf of Israel Occupations and Hypocrisy’ http://counterpunch.com/baroud03122005.html March 12th 2005).

America insists that after the syrian army has withdrawn, the next freely elected lebanese government should implement another aspect of un resolution 1559 concerning the disarming of hezbollah this in country in which all the different religious denominations have heavily armed militias. This american policy would be of enormous benefit to the zionist state.

Finally, america issues no ultimatum to the zionist state to withdraw its army from the gaza strip and the west bank. It refuses to insist that the zionist state should abide by all un resolutions.

The pattern is blatantly clear. America supports un resolutions only when they promote the interests of the zionist state in palestine and dismisses un resolutions that are against the interests of the zionist state. In effect, it is pursuing the foreign policy of the zionist state in palestine.

The same thing happened over iraq. For 13 years america (and brutland) insisted that saddam abide by un resolutions and then launched a pre-emptive war against iraq without support of a un resolution. The war was of huge military and political benefit to the zionist state whilst being a financial, political, and military, disaster for america. They used to say that america invaded iraq for the oil so what are they going to say about a possible american attack on syria?

Now why should america pursue foreign policies which benefit another country to its own detriment? Because america is ruled by zionists.

American Policies toward Syria prove it is a Zionist Occupied Government.
		Published March 13th 2005. America is pursuing another proxy zionist foreign policy in syria just as it did in iraq. A leading lebanese politician is killed in a bombing and, without any evidence, america immediately blames syria. It insists that syria should abide by united nations’ resolution 1559 which requires all foreign forces to leave the country. However, whilst america insists that syria should leave lebanon, it refuses to demand the withdrawal of the zionist army occupying the sheba farms area of lebanon. America also fails to abide by a un resolution demanding that the zionist state should end its occupation of syria’s golan heights, "Syria's ultimate objective is, of course, to free its own Golan Heights from Israeli control. The Golan was occupied during the Israeli-Arab war of 1967 and was illegally annexed by Israel in 1981 in violation of UN Security Council resolution 497." (Ramzy Baroud ‘Reining in Syria on Behalf of Israel Occupations and Hypocrisy’ http://counterpunch.com/baroud03122005.html March 12th 2005). America insists that after the syrian army has withdrawn, the next freely elected lebanese government should implement another aspect of un resolution 1559 concerning the disarming of hezbollah this in country in which all the different religious denominations have heavily armed militias. This american policy would be of enormous benefit to the zionist state. Finally, america issues no ultimatum to the zionist state to withdraw its army from the gaza strip and the west bank. It refuses to insist that the zionist state should abide by all un resolutions. The pattern is blatantly clear. America supports un resolutions only when they promote the interests of the zionist state in palestine and dismisses un resolutions that are against the interests of the zionist state. In effect, it is pursuing the foreign policy of the zionist state in palestine. The same thing happened over iraq. For 13 years america (and brutland) insisted that saddam abide by un resolutions and then launched a pre-emptive war against iraq without support of a un resolution. The war was of huge military and political benefit to the zionist state whilst being a financial, political, and military, disaster for america. They used to say that america invaded iraq for the oil so what are they going to say about a possible american attack on syria? Now why should america pursue foreign policies which benefit another country to its own detriment? Because america is ruled by zionists.

All publications are copyrighted mundi club © You are welcome to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy.	We welcome additional information, comments, or criticisms. Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/