Terra Firm no.26: Essays on Zionism, Zionization, the Second Zionist Proxy War against Iraq, and the Global Zionist Conspiracy for World Domination.

In america, the israeli traitors in the zionist lobby, the zionist owned media, the republican/democratic branches of the likud party, the zionist dominated congress, and the bush administration, pushed america into a war against iraq by lying that saddam posed a direct military threat to america (a 45 minute threat to britain) through his possession of intercontinental weapons of mass destruction. They told americans that the defeat of saddam would be a cakewall and that americans would be welcomed as liberators by the majority of iraqis. "Until recently, a group of Zionists ran their own intelligence service inside the Pentagon. This was known as the Office of Special Plans, and was overseen by Douglas Feith, an under-secretary of defence, extreme Zionist and opponent of any negotiated peace with the Palestinians. It was the Office of Special Plans that supplied Downing Street with much of its scuttlebutt about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction; more often than not, the original source was Israel." (John Pilger ‘The Unmentionable Source of Terrorism’ http://antiwar.com/orig/pilger.php?articleid=2159 March 20, 2004).

These zionist allegations were all calculated lies and now americans are losing their lives and their wealth for the benefit of the jews-only state in palestine. The israeli traitors in america have driven america into moral, political, and military, bankruptcy. They are driving the americans into more wars in the middle east, "Any day now, the neocons may orchestrate a scenario that will suck the U.S. into a wider war that America has no possibility of winning. If the American people had the slightest sense of their danger, they would demand immediate U.S. withdrawal from Iraq and accountability for the liars who orchestrated the ill-fated U.S. invasion." (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Outfoxed by bin Laden’ http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=4898 February 21, 2005).

It is time to curb the israeli traitors running the bush administration. "The neoconservatives are the greatest threat America has ever faced, and they control the Office of the President, the Office of the Vice President, the Department of State, the Department of Defense, and the police-state apparatus known as "Homeland Security." (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Outfoxed by bin Laden’ http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=4898 February 21, 2005). Wayne madsen believes that the israeli traitors have infested even more substantial parts of the american state, "What has some national security agency officials worried is that with pro-Israeli neocons now engrained within the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), State Department, and National Security Council, NSA is ripe for penetration by Israeli intelligence." (Wayne Madsen ‘The neocon power grab at NSA and an attempt to stifle the press’ http://www.onlinejournal.com
/Special_Reports/052405Madsen/052405madsen.html May 24th 2005).

Curbing the israeli traitors running america can be done only by ensuring that there is proportionate ethnic representation at all levels of the american political system.

The main anti-war issue is not america’s invasion of iraq nor the possible invasion of iran but zionists’ take over of the american political system. It is not going to be possible to extricate the american military from iraq until americans liberate themselves from their slavery to zionism. It’s time americans launched a war of independence against the racist, likud-loving neocons who dominate american politics. The americans succeeded in throwing off british colonial rule and now they need to do the same with zionist colonial rule. Americans need to acquire self rule if they are ever going to show iraqis what it is. They have to overthrow their zionist oppressors if they are going to extricate themselves from the disastrous war they have launched against iraq for the sake of the jews-only state in palestine. The war against iraq is a zionist proxy war. Anti war protestors need to focus on the world’s most critical war the war against zionist global domination - before they tackle the secondary war in iraq.

The zionist state was built on violence, the ethnic cleansing of palestinians, and the theft of palestinian land i.e. lebensraum. It has been consolidated through further violence and the continual theft of palestinian land. The palestinians will never be able to negotiate any peace with sharon and his zionist fundamentalists. They are bank robbers acting under orders from god or, as they like to call him, the master of the universe. Outside the bank of palestine are the zionist police - george bush and tony blair - who proclaim to the world that palestinians are to blame for the bank robbery. They insist that palestinians should not retaliate against the robbery. They also insist that palestinians should seek a peace agreement with the zionist bank robbers without interfering in the robbery. Bush and blair warmly applaud the jewish bank robbers trooping in and out of the bank of palestine taking whatever palestinian property they want, whilst at the same time insisting that everyone else should abide by the law and live peacefully in a democratic society. They provided the zionists with the weapons to break into the bank and ensure they are sufficiently armed to prevent the palestinians from resisting the theft of their property, "In its current human rights report, the Foreign Office criticises Israel for its "worrying disregard for human rights" and "the impact that the continuing Israeli occupation and the associated military occupations have had on the lives of ordinary Palestinians." Yet the Blair government has secretly authorised the sale of vast quantities of arms and terror equipment to Israel. These include leg-irons, electric shock belts and chemical and biological agents. No matter that Israel has defied more United Nations resolutions than any other state since the founding of the world body." (John Pilger ‘The Unmentionable Source of Terrorism’ http://antiwar.com/orig/pilger.php?articleid=2159 March 20, 2004). The jews-only bank robbers will not stop until all palestinian property has been taken because this is what the jews-only god is commanding them to do.

The best thing the palestinians can do is cross the road to the bank of iraq and learn how the iraqi freedom fighters are resisting the american bank robbers who, it was estimated in february 2005, have stolen £9 billion of iraqi assets after occupying the country for less than two years. "Four days before Volcker reported his findings about Saddam Hussein, the US inspector general for Iraq reconstruction published a report about the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) - the US agency which governed Iraq between April 2003 and June 2004. The inspector general's job is to make sure that the money the authority spent was properly accounted for. It wasn't. In just 14 months, $8.8bn went absent without leave. This is more than Mobutu Sese Seko managed to steal in 32 years of looting Zaire. It is 55,000 times as much as Mr Sevan is alleged to have been paid. The authority, the inspector general found, was "burdened by severe inefficiencies and poor management". This is kind. Other investigations suggest that it was also burdened by false accounting, fraud and corruption. Last week a British adviser to the Iraqi Governing Council told the BBC's File on Four programme that officials in the CPA were demanding bribes of up to $300,000 in return for awarding contracts. Iraqi money seized by US forces simply disappeared. Some $800m was handed out to US commanders without being counted or even weighed. A further $1.4bn was flown from Baghdad to the Kurdish regional government in the town of Irbil, and has not been seen since. Contracts to US companies were awarded by the CPA without any financial safeguards. They were issued without competition, in the form of "cost-plus" deals. This means that the companies were paid for the expenses they incurred, plus a percentage of those expenses in the form of profit. They had a powerful incentive, in other words, to spend as much money as possible. As a result, the authority appears to have obtained appalling value for money. Auditors at the Pentagon, for example, allege that, in the course of just one contract, a subsidiary of Halliburton overcharged it for imported fuel by $61m. This appears to have been officially sanctioned. Other companies appear to have charged the authority for work they never did, or to have paid subcontractors to do it for them for a fraction of what they were paid by the CPA. Yet, even when confronted by cast-iron evidence of malfeasance, the authority kept employing them. When the inspector general recommended that the US army withhold payments from companies which appear to have overcharged it, it ignored him. No one has been charged or punished. The US department of justice refuses to assist the whistle-blowers who are taking these companies to court. What makes all this so serious is that more than half the money the CPA was giving away did not belong to the US government but to the people of Iraq. Most of it was generated by the coalition's sales of oil. If you think the UN's oil-for-food programme was leaky, take a look at the CPA's oil-for-reconstruction scheme. Throughout the entire period of CPA rule, there was no metering of the oil passing through Iraq's pipelines, which means that there was no way of telling how much of the country's wealth the authority was extracting, or whether it was paying a fair price for it. The CPA, according to the international monitoring body charged with auditing it, was also "unable to estimate the amount of petroleum ... that was smuggled"." (George Monbiot ‘Fraud and corruption’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story
/0,3604,1407964,00.html February 8, 2005).

There should be international recognition for the fact that the construction of illegal zionist settlements in palestinian areas is an act of unprovoked terrorism on the palestinian people which the palestinians have a legal and moral right to resist. As every good american and british homeowners know, there is only one way to stop those stealing from their homes. Palestinians have the right to defend themselves from terrorists, mass murderers, and thieves, like sharon and the zionists.

There should be international insistence that the jews-only state should permanently fix its borders. The jews-only state is the only state in the world that has flexible borders i.e. borders it can continually push outwards depending on how much land it can steal from neighbouring countries. "Israel is unique in that it doesn't have defined or recognized borders ... Israel has always been a country with creeping borders - it has an insatiable urge to expand, and thus further dispossess the native population. On May 14, 1948, the day he proclaimed the new state without specifying its borders, Ben Gurion wrote in his diary: "Take the American Declaration of Independence for instance. It contains no mention of the territorial limits" A few years later, Ben-Gurion wrote: "To maintain the status quo will not do. We have to set up a dynamic state bent upon expansion" The current construction of the land-grab wall is merely the latest manifestation of these expansionist proclivities." (Paul de Rooij ‘Straw Men and Wild Fires’ http://www.counterpunch.org/rooij02282005.html February 28, 2005).

"Normally, all aid is cut off. There is an arms and trade embargo. All transfers of funds are frozen. Foreign bank accounts are seized. Air links and most diplomatic ties are cut. Cultural and scientific exchanges are terminated. To make all this stick, the pariah state must be surrounded by obviously superior military forces. There is a crash program to bolster its neighbors' defense capabilities; a US-led coalition sends many thousands of troops; naval forces are deployed; intelligence and counterintelligence efforts accelerated. Such a state is quietly given to understand that, should it ever use nuclear weapons, it can expect retaliation in kind. This of course would be a very moderate response, nothing like what happened to Serbia or Iraq. But simply to contain Israel -not to attack it -would require an initiative orders of magnitude greater than the buildup to the Gulf War." (Michael Neumann ‘The Jewish Left and Palestine’ http://www.counterpunch.org/neumann0427.html April 26, 2002).

Iran has a right to acquire nuclear weapons for its own defence. It is surrounded to the west by the jews-only state in palestine which possesses nuclear weapons; to the east by pakistan and india which have nuclear weapons; and to the north by russia which has a vast arsenal of nuclear weapons. In recent years it has also been surrounded by america in afghanistan and iraq. The iranians thus have legitimate military reasons for possessing nuclear weapons to protect themselves from their nuclear-armed neighbours. If the jews-only state in palestine has nuclear weapons this legitimizes iran’s possession of such weapons. (Once again, these arguments are not meant to support nuclear weapons but to support the abolition of all such weapons).

In america, it is argued that the prospect of allowing ‘irrational, islamic psychopaths’ to acquire nuclear weapons would be madness. However, the fact is that ‘irrational, jewish psychopaths’ have such weapons so why not iran? Even more frightening for iran is the possibility that the mad judaic mullahs will eventually take complete control of the jews-only theocratic state so the only way for the iranians to curb their expansionist malignancy would be by acquiring nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are safer in the hands of iranian mullahs because they are far more civilized in comparison to the irrational religious lunatics in the jews-only state who believe in fantasies such as the jews-only holocaust. The jews-only state in palestine is racist but the iranian state is not.

It is true that iran has signed the non-proliferation treaty. But it is legally entitled to withdraw from the treaty if it believes this would be in its national interests. The jews-only state illegally occupying palestine has refused to sign the treaty so this provides less incentive for the iranians to continue abiding by it. Indeed, the best moral and legal justification that iran has for developing nuclear weapons are the threats being made against it by the zionist occupied governments of palestine, britain, and the united states.

The jews-only state, and the zionists controlling the bush administration, want to launch a war against iran to establish democracy (hic!) in that country. They believe a major benefit of democratizing iran would be to prevent the mullahs from getting nuclear weapons. However, it could be argued that if iran became more democratic there would be an increase in popular demands for the country to acquire nuclear weapons. Virtually every iranian, whether secular or religious, supports the idea of their country acquiring nuclear weapons. "But the mullahs are unlikely to give up their nuclear weapons efforts, which are popular among Iranians of all political persuasions …." (The New York Times ‘Military rumblings on Iran’ http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/
articles/2005/01/27/opinion/ediran.html January 28, 2005). The possession of nuclear weapons is popular in all countries which possess them so it is not surprising they would be popular in iran.

Since the jews-only state in palestine has got nuclear weapons the best way to neutralize and perhaps even abolish such weapons is if iran also acquires such weapons. In other words, the best way to bring peace to the middle east is to encourage the iranians to acquire nuclear weapons. Iran and the jews-only state can then negotiate to eradicate such weapons through a multi-lateral agreement. According to roger howard the real reason the jews-only state in palestine is opposed to iran getting nuclear weapons isn’t the military threat posed by such weapons but their political consequences for mutual disarmament, "It seems likely, then, that there are other, more convincing, reasons why Israel is concerned about an Iranian bomb. One possibility, for example, is that Tel Aviv is deeply concerned that such a development could potentially create deep splits in the U.S.-Israel alliance. Consider, for example, what would happen if Tehran, having developed a warhead and withdrawn from the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty, offered to reduce the size of or even eliminate its own nuclear arsenal in return for similar moves all UN-monitored by Tel Aviv." (Roger Howard ‘Why Israel Really Fears Iranian Nukes’ http://www.antiwar.com/orig/howard.php?articleid=4065 November 27, 2004); "Now that Saddam is defeated, Israel must seriously consider foregoing its nuclear weapons as part of a grand bargain with Iran. And the other Arab states, which are covertly developing the possibility of going nuclear, must open up and renounce the effort as Libya recently did." (Jonathan Power ‘The Danger of an Israeli Attack on Iran’ http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=60411
&d=14&m=3&y=2005 March 14th 2005).

It is argued that america is interested not merely in preventing iran from acquiring nuclear weapons but in eradicating the possession of such weapons by the jews-only state in palestine. But, the idea that a zionist dominated presidency/congress is going to pressure the jews-only state in palestine into giving up its nuclear weapons for the sake of encouraging middle eastern countries such as iran to abide by the npt is suspect. When in april 2004 bush recognized "the facts on the ground" concerning zionists’ illegal occupation of palestine he was also taking the first step in recognizing the jews-only state’s nuclear weapons.

Whether america forces the jews-only state to abide by international law and give up its nuclear weapons or whether it forces a change in international law to allow the jews-only state to have sole possession of nuclear weapons in the middle east, is a good indicator of the extent of jewish global domination.

In effect what the zogs want to do is bring about the deindustrialization of iran forcing iran to abandon the use of any technology which could be used for military purposes to defend the country from the zionist racist extremists in the jews-only state in palestine. In other words, what they are hoping to achieve is the palestinianization of iran which they are currently inflicting on palestine and iraq.

Putting aside iran’s political right to develop civilian nuclear power and its legitimate military right to develop nuclear weapons as a defense against its nuclear neighbours, the main reason it wants to develop civilian nuclear power is because it has vast uranium resources from which it could make substantial profits and extend the life of its fossil fuel resources, "Iran has huge reserves of raw uranium and has announced plans to extract more than 40 tons a year. That amount, if converted to uranium hexafluoride and repeatedly spun in centrifuges, could theoretically yield more than 200 pounds of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium, enough for about five crude nuclear weapons. Iranian officials say the Isfahan plant can convert more than 300 tons of uranium ore a year." (George Jahn , Associated Press Writer ‘Diplomats: Iran Readying Nuke Processes November 19th 2004).

Iran has a growing nuclear industry. It mines uranium; it is creating milling plants to manufacture yellow cake uranium; conversion plants to create uranium hexafluoride; and can manufacture gas centrifuges, "Furthermore, Iran has uranium mines in Yazd and is in the process of constructing milling plants to manufacture yellow cake uranium and conversion plants that convert it to UF6 gas.[32] Iran has also begun manufacturing its own gas centrifuges used to enrich uranium. Even if Natanz, Arak, and Bushehr were destroyed in a preemptive strike, Iran probably has duplicate equipment that can be activated and has the know-how to produce more, to pursue a more vigorous and unabated nuclear weapons program in the long term." (Sammy Salama and Karen Ruster ‘A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences’ CNS Research Story September 9, 2004).

The russians and the europeans are trying to mediate between the zionist dominated bush administration and iran by suggesting it might be possible to allow iran to use nuclear power without developing nuclear weapons if they were given control over uranium supplies to iran. George bush has acknowledged russia’s offer to do this, "Vladimir Putin pledged increased vigilance of expended uranium and the fuel cycle as part of Russian assistance in the construction and operation of Iranian reactors. President Bush mentioned this progress in Iran and even empathy for their development goals during his April 28, 2005 press conference: "As to Iran, what Russia has agreed to do is to send highly enriched uranium to a nuclear civilian power plant and then collect that uranium after it's used for electricity, power purposes. That's what they've decided to do. And I appreciate that gesture. And what Russia said: Fine, we'll provide you the uranium. We'll enrich it for you and provide it to you and then we'll collect it. And I appreciate that gesture. So I think Vladimir was trying to help there."" (‘Arming an Israeli Attack on Iran: Why the US should cancel "Bunker Buster" Bombs for Israel’ http://www.irmep.org/GBU.htm May 1st 2005).

The europeans are also interested in this strategy, "The Europeans are aiming to get Tehran to cease all uranium-related activity permanently and depend instead exclusively on imports of low-enriched fissile material produced by the Europeans for Iran's civilian nuclear program. This is totally unacceptable to the Iranians." (Dilip Hiro ‘The Iranian Nuclear Issue in a Global Context’ http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=5952 May 14th 2005).

In other words, the russians and the europeans want to prevent iran from exploiting its own uranium resources and force it to pay vast amounts of money to import a commodity which it has in abundance. It’s good to think that the russians and the europeans are trying to uphold the moral principles of the non-proliferation treaty rather than finding a means for promoting their material interests.

Whilst british politicians are insisting that iran stops any further use of civilian nuclear power they are arguing that britain needs to increase its reliance on nuclear power in order to combat global burning. In effect, the british government wants to prevent iran from adopting the main means it has chosen to combat global warming. It has to be asked what energy resources iran will be allowed to use if it is not allowed to use its fossil fuels or nuclear power. Britain and america want only the impoverishment of the iranian people.

It might be suspected that american air strikes alone couldn’t reliably stop iran from developing a nuclear weapon. But it would depend on the ferocity of the bombing. Saddam put up with air strikes for ten years and yet his political power in iraq increased so it is doubtful whether the american military would repeat that mistake. If the americans quickly and comprehensively destroyed iran’s infrastructure i.e. electricity power stations, water/sewage systems, telecommunications systems, bridges, etc, then the iranian people might revolt because they might conclude that acquiring nuclear weapons was too much of a price to pay for such severe losses. It would simply take too long for iran to develop a nuclear bomb before america could force the iranians into submission.

Given that american air strikes against iran would, over a short period of time, force the iranian people to revolt even if they didn’t want to, as was the case with air strikes against yugoslavia, then iran’s only option would be to act immediately and dramatically to spread the war around the middle east. The iranians’ only effective defence would be to attack america’s military forces in saudi arabia, kuwait, afghanistan, and iraq. Thus the more intense the american air strikes against iran, the more quickly and comprehensively the iranians would have to respond.

The iranians could also spread the war by attacking the oilfields in saudi arabia and kuwait in the hope of toppling these governments so that sunnis with sympathies for iran might take power. In order to defeat america’s proxy zionist war, or at the very least deter the zionists, the iranians would have to develop an alliance with the sunnis throughout the middle east. They could not afford to alienate them so that they joined the americans. This would be especially dangerous for iran since two of its provinces, baluchistan and khorasan, have high sunni populations both of which border the sunni dominated countries of afghanistan and pakistan. In attacking u.s. bases in middle eastern countries and destroying saudi and kuwaiti oil fields it might be possible for iran to avoid inflaming the sunnis and even win over their support for challenging the revolting americans. Although it is possible that the iranians might hope that a war with america might bring about the emergence of shia power in the middle east thereby eclipsing the sunnis, they would be better off seeking an alliance with the sunnis. Iran might be hoping that a middle east wide war will force america to send in more ground forces that would incur even greater financial costs that could topple the precarious american economy.

Iran has few alternatives. It is in iranians’ interests to spread the war as rapidly and as comprehensively as possible around the middle east and encourage a general uprising against the zionist imperialists firstly, to counter the horrendous air strikes they will suffer and secondly, to suck in more american forces to cause america even greater economic and military damage.

If america launches an unprovoked proxy zionist war against iran this will lead to a huge rise in oil prices which could trigger a global economoc recession, "Oil prices would double overnight to $100 a barrel." (Carlton Meyer ‘On to Iran?’ http://www.g2mil.com/Summer2005.htm Summer 2005); "Attacking Iran doesn't make good economic sense, either. Iran is OPEC's second-largest oil producer and holds 10% of the world's proven oil reserves. It also has the world's second largest natural gas reserves (after Russia). Oil and gas prices have recently soared in response to rising global demand and heightened security concerns in the Middle East. Iran is unlikely to maintain its current level of oil production in the face of a massive military assault. The loss of just a fraction of Iranian oil production through collateral damage, sabotage, or economic embargo could trigger a severe global recession." (Daniel T. Barkley Preemptive Strikes Will Not Disarm Iran’ http://www.antiwar.com
/orig/barkley.php?articleid=4009 November 19, 2004).

Since america imports only a small percentage of its oil from the middle east such tactics would not directly affect the american economy. However, it would suffer as a consequence of a recession in the world economy. A world economic recession would have a considerable impact on the american economy.

An american war against iran will be a proxy zionist war. America is ruled by israeli traitors i.e. jewish americans and their allies who give their loyalty to the jews-only state. It could suffer grievously both militarily and economically as a result of a conflagration in the middle east. The most worrying point is that the zionist traitors pushing america into such a war don’t care about the crippling effect that such a war would have on america’s economy or the loss of american lives. What does it matter to them if americans get killed or america goes bankrupt? Their sole interest is in zionist global domination and they are perfectly willing to sacrifice america to achieve such an objective.

China, however, stands to lose economically because of such a middle east war. It will suffer from the loss of iranian resources. It is unlikely however to risk taking any military action against america. The main military contribution that china and russia could make would be to arm iran before a war had started.

The racist, jews-only state in palestine is willing to push the whole world into an economic collapse, and possibly even a world war, simply because it wants to drive out the palestinians and create a racially pure state the antithesis of western multi-cultural societies. The paranoid supremacist jews-only state in palestine seems quite willing to force the entire world into an economic collapse.

What will be even more remarkable is the number of americans an europeans who will pretend that a war against iran has nothing to do with the jews-only state.

There needs to be support for national liberation movements in britain and america to overthrow the zionists occupying these countries’ political system and media. The zionists' ethnic cleansing of americans from the american media and american politics is almost as comprehensive as their ethnic cleansing of palestinians. At present there seems to be only three sorts of americans: firstly, the jewish elite most of whom are israeli traitors whose sole loyalty is to the zionist state in palestine. Secondly, zionist collaborators, shabbat goys, such as the likudnik republican and democratic parties, and dechristianized zionists. And, thirdly, zionist zombies who have suffered so much zionist indoctrination they believe zionists have no influence over american society.

Although there are incontrovertible reasons for opposing america’s proxy zionist war against iran, the more vociferous that the israeli traitors in the american media, the zionist lobby, the likudnik dominated republican and democratic parties, and the bush administration, have become in demanding that america sacrifices itself to invade iran (and syria), the more tempting such a war becomes. The reason for this is that it is likely to bring about the destruction of america’s proxy zionist empire. In turn, this might force americans to start questioning why all of their political debates are dominated by people whose only loyalty is to the jews-only state in palestine. There is no way that domestic opposition to bush is going to bring an end his zionist policies because there is no opposition worth speaking about. There is no way that domestic opposition to america’s zionist ruling elite is going to end the rule of this elite because there is no such opposition. There are so many zionist cuckoos living in the great american cuckooland that only resistance in the middle east is going to stop them. Of course, i do not support such invasions but what other hope is left for such a hopeless country?

All publications are copyrighted mundi club © You are welcome to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy.	We welcome additional information, comments, or criticisms. Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/

Political Priorities in Global Politics.