That judaism is a jews-only religion, which makes it difficult for non-jews to become believers in judaism, is complicated by the fact that converts would be entitled to immigrate to the jews-only state. The power to allow gentiles to convert to judaism, and thus gain entry to the jews-only state, has been tightly controlled by orthodox jews in the jews-only state. However, this power has recently been dissipated by a court ruling, "By a majority of 7-4, the court ruled yesterday that gentiles who studied for conversion to Judaism in non-Orthodox Israeli training courses, completing the process abroad, had an automatic right to come back and obtain instant Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return. The verdict is being seen by many as a significant step towards recognising the right of Reform and Conservative rabbis to carry out non-Orthodox conversions in Israel itself. In effect, it redefines who is a Jew in Israeli civil law and threatens the iron control of the Orthodox establishment in Israel over Jewish marriage, divorce, conversion and burial. Would-be converts based in Israel wishing to train for conversion in the liberal streams of the Jewish tradition are currently unable to complete the process in the country, as a result of pressure from the Orthodox Jewish establishment. As a result many go abroad to convert, but up until now have been denied the privileges accorded to Orthodox Jewish converts. David Ben-Gurion, the founding father, explained: "It is not the state which grants the right to settle in the state to the Jew abroad. This right is ingrained in him insofar as he is a Jew." The first breach in the Orthodox monopoly came in 1989, when the Supreme Court held that non-Orthodox proselytes converted in their own countries counted as Jews for immigration and citizenship purposes. The Reform and Conservative movements represent a majority of American Jews and a growing minority in Britain, though they remain marginal in Israel. They offer a less stringent entry ticket to Judaism." (Eric Silver ‘Israel's Orthodox groups face challenge over Jewish identity’ http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=625286 April 01st 2005).

Zionists have erected a mountain of lies over the jews-only state in order to deceive the world into believing that it is just another western, multi-cultural, liberal, secular, democracy rather than a racist, jews-only state. Most non-jews would tend to accept any one of these lies that the jews-only state uses to defend itself and thus cast doubts about the rationality of the palestinian cause. Bulldozing these lies out of the way to uncover the truth is almost a full time occupation.

Firstly, palestinian israelis have only limited political rights in comparison to jews. They have the right to vote in zionist elections, form political parties, hold political meetings, contest elections for seats in the knesset, and even become members of the jewish parliament. But, they are not allowed to form political parties which advocate a multi-cultural state in which palestinians and jews share power, "[I]n this "outpost of democracy," no party that opposes the existence of the Jewish state is permitted to take part in elections. It is as if the United States were to declare itself a Christian state, define "Christian" not by religious belief but by descent, and then pass a "gag law" prohibiting public discussion of the issue." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’ counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004); "The Israeli Supreme Court has even ruled that nobody can run for membership in the Knesset (parliament) who challenges the idea that Israel is a Jewish state or who challenges the principle of preserving a Jewish majority." (1989 Israeli Supreme Court ruling reported in the 1991 Israel Law Review, Vol. 25, p. 219, published by the Faculty of Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem ). (John Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’ http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).

Secondly, although palestinian israelis seem to have many political rights, they do not have the same legal rights as jews ­ which surely indicates the insignificance of their political rights. It also indicates the low opinion that jews have of democracy. "The tours (of Palestinian and Bedouin areas inside Israel) proved to be a dramatic illustration of the discrimination and racism inherent in a system designed specifically to maintain a Jewish majority - a system based on the superiority of Jews over anyone else. Palestinians, including Bedouin, living inside Israel are citizens of the state. They can vote in Israeli elections; Bedouin, although not other Palestinians, serve in the Israeli military. As a matter of law and of the institutional arrangements inherent in Israel's status as a Jewish-majority state, however, Palestinians and Bedouin, because they are non-Jews, do not receive anything like equal rights or services from the state. Not only do they face the kind of de facto discrimination that blacks have faced in the U.S. - their schools are inadequate, their municipal services are inadequate, they face job discrimination, their towns often sit next to toxic waste dumps and other environmentally hazardous sites - but because Israel is explicitly a Jewish state, Palestinians are unable by law to enjoy the benefits of the state provided to Jews or in any way to live in the state as Jews do." (Kathleen & Bill Christison ‘"Finally It Broke My Heart": Random Impressions from Palestine’ http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09242004.html September 24, 2004); "Not only are the subjects of the occupation for more than a generation, 38 years, not allowed inside the country without a regime of special permits, and for the last 15 years prevented from working; and not only, when they leave their defined territories to spend a period of time overseas, can they lose their homes and property forever, as if they were foreigners; but the Arabs who are the citizens of Israel lose more and more of their civil rights, like the right to grant their children minimum conditions to live with dignity, a public library, a cultural center, enough nutrition." (Yitzhak Laor ‘Israel Makes It Harder for Non-Jews to Become Citizens: Racism by Any Other Name’ http://www.counterpunch.org/laor04072005.html April 7, 2005); "Nor do we find equal treatment of citizens in the Jewish state; the collectivist government of Israel spends far more money on its Jewish citizens than it does on the Palestinian citizens of Israel. For example, the housing ministry spends about $30 on Jewish towns for every dollar it spends on Arab towns." (Stephen j. Sniegoski ‘Sharansky, Weissglas, and the Inaugural address: The Israeli connection continues February 2, 2005); "Today there are about six million Jewish and one million non-Jewish Israeli citizens; of the non-Jewish citizens about 250,000 are classified as "present-absentees" (under the Absentees Property Law of 1950) in consequence of which they are denied - forever - all of their property rights which were valid until the creation of the Jewish state in 1948. A Jew, however, cannot be classified as a "present-absentee" in the Jewish state of Israel. Non-Jews inside the Jewish state of Israel are discriminated against in multiple ways, some de jure and many de facto. Non-Jews are excluded from Jews-only housing and are segregated in Arab villages and towns that receive far less from the government than Jewish ones. The difference between the Jewish and non-Jewish living environments is like the difference between an inner city ghetto in the United States and an upscale suburban residential area." (John Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’ http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).

Palestinian israelis are second class citizens in the jews-only state. This situation is entirely temporary as the goal of the jews-only state is to drive out or deport these indigenous ‘aliens’ whenever the opportunity arises. Paradoxically, in order to win the sympathies of people around the world, jews try to hide the second class citizenship of israeli palestinians from the outside world ­ as they do their desire for a jews-only state. Whilst pretending to western audiences that the zionist state is an open, western, secular, multicultural, society like all other western states, zionists are doing their utmost to remove all palestinians from their own country whenever they can get away with it. The more that zionists try to make conditions for palestinians unlivable in order to force them to leave palestine, the more effort that zionists make to cover up such ethnic cleansing with the deception that the jews-only state is just like any other western state. There are jews in the western world who pretend to be anti-zionist in order to surreptitiously put forward arguments in favour of the jews-only state in palestine. They do this by suggesting that in the jews-only state, palestinians have the same rights as jews. Supposedly anti-zionist jews invariably expose their pro-zionist views when they claim that jews and palestinians are equal.

Although palestinian-israelis can form their own political parties and be elected to knesset it has to be wondered why they should bother doing this when they can’t legislate on property, immigration, racism, roads, settlements, planning, foreign policy, the nature of the jews-only state, etc, etc, etc. This sole purpose of this sham democracy is to prevent the world from understanding the racism of the jews-only state in palestine. One can only be amazed at the sheer gall, chutzpah, of the jews who resolutely defend the jews-only state whilst advocating a permanent revolution to encourage more countries to become democratic. The zionist intent is to focus on every ill in the world to prevent the world from seeing that it is being poisoned by the jews-only state in palestine. One of the leaders of the jews-only state, nathan sharansky, who regards even ariel sharon as being soft on palestinians, has become a guiding light in the formulation of the bush administration’s foreign policies to democratize the world. Sharansky wants all countries to become democratic ­ except the jews-only state in palestine, "In short, Sharansky puts the goal of Jewish exclusivism far above the ideal of universal democracy. Ethnocentrism trumps the concept of equality in citizenship." (Stephen j. Sniegoski ‘Sharansky, Weissglas, and the Inaugural address: The Israeli connection continues February 2, 2005).

It is commonplace for the jews-only state to steal palestinian land but, even worse is that it also expropriates the land of palestinian israelis ­ despite the fact that such israeli citizens are supposed to be protected by the law. The only difference between the theft of property from palestinians and palestinian israelis is that in the former case jews expropriate the land illegally whilst in the latter case jews have to carry out the confiscation legally, as the nazis did during the second world war. "Israel has nationalised some 93 per cent of the country's lands, by appropriating land without compensation from the four million Palestinian refugees who live in exile and by confiscating the lands of the one million Palestinians who live as citizens. This 93 per cent of Israel is out of bounds to Palestinians ..." (Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada, ‘Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside Israel’ http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3674.shtml March 10th 2005). Palestinian israelis have no rights to stop the jews-only state from confiscating their land.

Some zionists have become politically embarrassed about such property theft. But what they are embarrassed about is not the racism itself but the erroneous perception of racism by the rest of the world. So the jews-only state is currently seeking ways to camouflage this racism to win the approval of its supposedly anti-racist supporters in the western world, "Since 1961, the state has administered the JNF lands through the Israel Lands Administration (ILA). Until recently, only Jews were permitted to participate in the tenders for the leasing of JNF land, but Attorney General Menachem Mazuz decided last week that the ILA could not continue this policy because it discriminated between Jews and non-Jews." (Amiram Barkat ‘Buying the State of Israel’ www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=539278 February 11th 2005); "the Jewish National Fund … maintains and implements Israel's discriminatory land policies. Two weeks ago, Israel's attorney general determined that all land managed by the Israel Lands Administration, including land owned by the Jewish National Fund, must be marketed without discrimination or limits including to non-Jews. According to the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, "The state prosecutor's office believes it will not be able to defend before the High Court the policy of allocating Jewish National Fund land to Jews only." Days later, news agencies reported, " The Jewish National Fund and the Finance Ministry are discussing ways to separate the JNF from the state, to allow it to continue selling land to Jews only."" ('QUIT! premieres latest line of "Estee Slaughter" products on Valentine's Day' http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3627.shtml February 21st 2005). However, these political anxieties about the anti-racist sensibilities of westerners might be misplaced given that many western governments have given so much support to the jews-only state they are now as racist as the jews-only state in palestine.

This policy continues today, "Israel plans to terminate employment opportunities for Palestinians by 2008. Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya'alon said Israel no longer maintains a policy of encouraging Palestinian employment. Ya'alon said the government has been phasing out the number of jobs available to Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip in Israel. By 2008, Israel would institute a complete ban on the employment of Palestinians, Middle East Newsline reported. The government can ban Palestinians from entering Israel and requires entry and work permits. "The goal is to stop Palestinians from working in Israel by 2008," Ya'alon told the Low-Intensity Conflict warfare counter-terrorism [LIC-2005] conference on Tuesday. Ya'alon said Israel has been encouraging Western and other donor nations to help the Palestinian Authority create jobs in an effort to end its dependence on the Jewish state. He said the new policy no longer regards a peace agreement with the PA as resulting in security." (Israel to ban hiring of Palestinians’ WORLD TRIBUNE.COM March 10, 2005).

The jews-only state allows christians to visit holy christian sites in palestine, but it is not willing to allow them to immigrate and become israeli citizens ­ especially if they are palestinian christians.

Of course, all states around the world have the right to control immigration but the jews-only state in palestine allows immigration only from jews not from any other race or religion. In other words, the jews-only state promotes a racist, jews-only, immigration policy.

In america, virtually all the main pro-zionists who support racist immigration policies in the jews-only state in palestine are ardent opponents of limits on immigration into america.

Many jews in the jews-only state were horrified by the tsunami which hit south-east asia in december 2004. They were horrified by the idea that jewish victims might end up being buried with the tens of thousands of goy victims, "While the whole world had sent aid to the tsunami-hit South East Asia, Israel forwarded a team entrusted with a unique task. Not many Israeli tourists were swept away by the giant waves ­ official death toll stands at three, with some twenty missing; not many comparing with the hundred thousand Indonesians or even with three thousand Swedes. Still the Israeli teams were very active on the ground. The highly trained experts led by Rabbi Meshi Zahav did not go to save trapped survivors or alleviate suffering of millions; their job was to save dead Jews from fate worse than death ­ that is to be buried with the goyim in the same grave. The Haaretz daily reported: "The Israeli rescue teams in Thailand split up Thursday: one team worked on identifying bodies in Krabi, while another worked on the same task in Phuket. The Israeli crews - from the police and Zaka (a non-profit group that specializes in identifying victims of disasters) - are trying to locate dead Israelis before they are buried". They pressed upon the Thai government to postpone the mass entombment, though it was necessary to prevent the spread of epidemics; and Bangkok gave in. Every dead Jewish body should be taken to Israel, or at least buried separately from impure non-Jews. Witty Gilad Atzmon remarked: "the ‘altruistic’ Jews … are in a state of panic, as we all know, dead Jews are precious, they deserve a special burial. The fact that 5-10 Jews might be lost forever among some other 125.000 gentiles is pretty horrifying, I am sure you can see it."" (Israel Shamir ‘Tsunami in Gaza’ January 2nd 2005).

In the jews-only state, with its jews-only religion, jews-only political rights, jews-only legal rights, jews-only culture, jews-only borders, jews-only employment, jews-only land ownership, jews-only planning laws, jews-only roads running between jews-only settlements/villages/towns/cities, jews-only immigration, jews-only cemeteries, it is absolutely imperative that, in death, every part of a jew’s body is buried in a jews-only cemetery, "A week after the Likud referendum, two terrible blows were delivered. An armored vehicle carrying a large quantity of explosives entered Gaza city in order to blow up buildings, and was hit by a roadside bomb planted by Palestinian guerillas. It exploded, tearing the six soldiers to pieces. The day after, the very same thing happened on the "Philadelphi Axis": an armored personnel carrier full of explosives, which was sent there to blow up tunnels under the border, was hit by a Palestinian rocket and blew up with its five crew members. The power of each of the two explosions was such that body parts were scattered over hundreds of meters. The whole country saw on TV how Israeli soldiers crawled on all fours, filtering the sand with their bare hands in order to gather the body parts of their comrades. The media competed in the orchestration of a necrophile hysteria, with endless talk about "body parts" interlaced with scenes of funerals. (Uri Avnery ‘Busharon: The Countdown’ May 15th, 2004). There is no intention here of mocking zionists’ death rituals. All cultures have their own rituals concerning the burial of the dead and each must be given the same respect. However, the general respect I afforded this ritual unexpectedly blew up in my face a few months later when I read an article in which the commentator made an aside that jews-only state refuses to return to their families what is left of the bodies of palestinian suicide bombers. "When Michael Matza, the Inquirer's Jerusalem correspondent, wrote a story headlined "Palestinians' Remains Fuel a Bitterness," which detailed Israel's practice of not releasing the bodies of suicide bombers, it provoked a hue and cry from readers who felt the piece was too sympathetic to families of the bombers. It didn't matter that Matza had written numerous pieces sympathetic to Israeli victims of suicide attacks. He was denounced as anti-Semitic and labeled a "self-hating Jew," a favorite epithet for Jewish journalists." (Barbara Matusow ‘Caught in the Crossfire’ American Journalism Review June/July 2004 issue). This is not just a one-off policy. "As I wrote the press release I was almost in tears because I was just going through the motions. Three youths, apparently trying to sneak into Israel to work, had been shot at, beaten and then (had) their organs crudely taken out of their bodies. Unceremoniously the bodies were returned four days later, no explanation. By any human standard, this is a massive story full of political intrigue." (Mark Schneider 'American Media Censorship and Israel' http://www.ccmep.org/ccmep/american031902.html 19.3.2002). This is part of zionists’ cultural terrorism against palestinians. The zionists show their utter contempt for palestinians by doing the exact opposite of what is demanded of them by their own death rituals.

Once again, this was not a rare racist remark in an otherwise non-racist society. "Recently, a law was passed in one of the Israeli Knesset's many committees saying that settlers who will be evacuated following a future retreat from the Gaza Strip will be given compensation. There was a minimal majority of one committee member for this law, which is an essential part of prime minister's Ariel Sharon's plan of "Gaza Disengagement", and in order for it to be passed the balance was tipped to the side of the government from outside the coalition by Member of Knesset Mohammad Barake. Barake, a MK from "Hadash" party (the former communist party) is, as his name might indicate, an Israeli Arab. Limor Livnat, the Israeli minister of education, who had also voted in favor of the law, was one of the most noticeable politicians in a group of right wing Knesset members and others who had each expressed outrage that an Arab (who had, like any other Member of the Knesset, been elected democratically) was the one to determine the future of Israel in such an important question. Because of Livnat's high position in the government there was a mini uproar in the Israeli media about the fact that the minister of education, the person who is in charge of what children will be taught in schools, had said something so bluntly racist. In actuality, no one was surprised. No one has any illusions that Ariel Sharon and the rest of the ministers besides - maybe - politicians from the Labor Party, think any differently from Livnat, in spite of them remaining more or less silent about the subject. In any normal "western" democracy such a thing would have become an immediate scandal. I can only imagine that if Germany's education minister would say something even remotely close to Livnat's statement about a Jewish parliament member, the only question would be whether that minister would find him or herself out of a job more quickly than it would take the foreign minister of Israel to file an official protest." (Uri Yaakobi ‘Limor Livnat and the Palestinian "problem"’ http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3634.shtml February 23rd 2005).

There are plenty of other examples of such racism from virtually all jews-only politicians. Racist views such as these should not be surprising in a racist state. What is surprising is that such views should be surprising in a racist state ­ but then what this indicates is the power of zionist propaganda around the world which presents the jews-only state as being a multi-cultural society.

Racism is not just prevalent amongst jews-only politicians in the jews-only state but amongst most jews themselves. Israel shamir quotes matti golan, the former editor-in-chief of the leading zionist newspaper ‘haaretz’ and of the ‘globes’, the paper for the jewish economic elites. "My problem is not only with Germany. It is with everything German, anywhere. I neither argue nor get upset. I have simply wiped Germany and its people off my globe". Shamir explains that, "Golan is not a firebrand; he is not one of Jewish religious fanatics who deny goyim even descent from Adam. Golan is not a Cabbalist and extremist but one of the sane, non-religious mainstream influential Jewish intellectuals. When this article was discussed on IsraelForum.com in the internet, a typical Jewish response was this: "Matti Golan is a prominent journalist and columnist. He represents ideas held by the vast majority of Israeli Jews in this subject. My opinion included." If I were a German, I would have second thoughts before providing Matti Golan's country with nuclear-capable submarines lest he will 'simply wipe Germany and its people off our globe'. In my view, Golan sounded a call for racist hatred and genocide." (Israel Shamir ‘Children Of A Lesser God’ Rense.com http://www.rense.com/general52/children.htm 01.05.04).

Perhaps there ought to be a zionist lobby in the jews-only state to enforce the charade that the jews-only state is a non-racist, multi-cultural society.

The jews-only state renewed the law in july 2004, "Also Sunday, the Israeli Cabinet extended for six months a rule forbidding Palestinians who marry Israelis from living in Israel. Human rights groups have criticized the law. Arabs make up about 20 percent of the country's population, and many Israelis are concerned about their growing numbers." (Ibrahim Barzak ‘Palestinian Authority Offices Burned Down’ Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4324486,00.html?gusrc=ticker-103704 July 18, 2004).

These are not the only jews-only international laws, "On December 13, 2004 the EU General Affairs and External Relations Council approved the EU-Israel Action Plan as part of the EU's New Neighborhood Policy - one step below full membership in the EU. According to the released EU-Israel Action Plan: "The EU and Israel are now closer together than ever before and, as near neighbours, will reinforce their political and economic interdependence. Enlargement offers the opportunity for the EU and Israel to develop an increasingly close relationship, going beyond co-operation, to involve a significant measure of economic integration and a deepening of political co-operation." Despite European declarative positions affirming Israel's obligations in international law, and dismissing Israel's rejection of them, and despite Israel's shocking human rights record, the EU-Israel Action Plan states that the "EU and Israel share the common values of democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law and basic freedoms." Worse, the EU-Israel Action Plan might even lead to Israel deciding on EU policies themselves. It stated "the possibility for Israel to participate progressively in key aspects of EU policies and programmes." It provides "an upgrade in the scope and intensity of political co-operation." Concrete steps include that the "EU will continue its efforts to ensure that the condemnation of anti-Semitism will become a part of international norms through, inter alia, appropriate UN resolutions." Considering Israel's policy to equate anti-Semitism with criticism of Israeli state practices vis-a-vis Palestinian civilians, this has meant that the EU will censure itself when it comes to address Israeli violations of human rights. The EU-Israel Action Plan formalised the facilitation of Israel's violations of human rights and international humanitarian law by shielding Israel from legal and political accountability, and by helping it escape the normal penalties or costs that would result ordinarily from the violations." (Arjan El Fassed, The Electronic Intifada, ‘In bed with Israel: EU's close relationship with Israel supports abuse’ http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3600.shtml March 11th 2005).

Another jews-only lie is that in 1948 jews did not drive palestinians out of palestine - they left of their own accord, "Mr. Ben Gurion's first claim that the Arab exodus from Palestine was provoked by directives from the leaders of the surrounding Arab states has been shown by overwhelming historical research to be false." (William Martin ‘Who is Pushing Whom into the Sea?’ http://www.counterpunch.org/martin03112005.html March 11, 2005); "But Wiesel cannot even bring himself to tell the truth about what caused their diaspora. He continues to spread one of the most insidious myths in Zionist discourse saying, "Incited by their leaders, 600,000 Palestinians left the country convinced that, once Israel was vanquished, they would be able to return home." Wiesel knows Arab leaders did not tell their people to leave; that lie was thoroughly disproved by historians years ago. Second, he knows that the best estimates are that 750,000 Palestinians fled in 1948. (Note the outrage by Wiesel and others whenever anyone dares to question the number of 6 million Jews killed in the Holocaust.) And third, these original Palestinian refugees did not just leave; they were driven out, often by the very terrorists for whom Wiesel proudly worked. The massacre at Deir Yassin was emblematic of this." (Letter by Daniel A. McGowan, Director, Deir Yassin Remembered - February 26, 2005).

The third major jews-only lie is that despite being driven out of palestine, the palestinians threatened to drive the jews into the sea, "On 11 October 1961 Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion declared in the Israeli Knesset: 'The Arabs' exit from Palestine...began immediately after the UN resolution, from the areas earmarked for the Jewish state. And we have explicit documents testifying that they left Palestine following instructions by the Arab leaders, with the Mufti at their head, under the assumption that the invasion of the Arab armies at the expiration of the Mandate will destroy the Jewish state and push all the Jews into the sea, dead or alive'. The phrase "push all the Jews into the sea, dead or alive" has acquired a life of its own as it is invoked by Zionist supporters on a daily basis in order to justify the aggressive policies of Israel as well as its recalcitrance in continuing the occupation of the Palestinians of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. It is a highly emotive phrase invoking images of the Holocaust, though adapted to a Mediterranean setting. Mr Ben Gurion gives no attribution for this phrase, nor does he claim that it is a quote from an Arab source. It is expressed here as if it is his personal surmise as to the Arab army's intentions. The phrase has been variously attributed by Zionist supporters to Yasser Arafat, Gamel Abdul Nasser, or any other of Israel's enemies, but none whom I have challenged, including U S Congressman Henry Waxman who made the claim in a letter to me, attributing the phrase to Nasser, have been able to provide any documentation of support for their claim. The speech by Mr. Ben Gurion appears to be the origin of the phrase. The phrase, thus, has a Jewish origin and not an Arab origin. Mr Ben Gurion is the originator of the phrase, in all likelihood." (William Martin ‘Who is Pushing Whom into the Sea?’ http://www.counterpunch.org/martin03112005.html March 11, 2005).

But surely, it might be countered, the use of the phrase "jews-only" is wrong since it implies that such policies are supported by all jews in palestine when such policies are the responsibility of only the zionist elite. It has to be pointed out however that, "By integrating all Jews in Israel into a society that is entirely based on racist principles - that Jews should live on land taken away from non-Jews, that Arab villages should be plowed under and made to vanish without a trace, that the state should be for "the Jews" rather than for all of its people, and that people should be identified as a "problem" merely because they are not Jewish (especially if they might become a majority!) - the Zionist project makes Jewish civilians seem to many Palestinians, quite understandably, just as culpable in the oppression of Palestinians as are Israeli soldiers who carry out the actual violence and terror. According to an article in the October 2002 issue of Outpost (published by Americans for a Safe Israel), "A recent public opinion poll found that more than one-third of Israelis favor the transfer of Arabs from Judea, Samaria and Gaza [i.e. the occupied territories] to neighboring Arab countries. That figure may rise or fall in response to specific events in the months to come, but one thing is now undeniably clear: the transfer solution is a serious proposition that can no longer be ignored." Another source reports, "Polls conducted in February 2002 in Israel demonstrated that 46% of respondents supported the transfer of Arabs from Judea, Samaria and Gaza, while 60% were inclined towards the transfer of Arabs from Israel proper."" (John Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’ http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).

It might also be countered that the use of the phrase "jews-only" is wrong since it implies a condemnation of jewish people around the world for what is being done in their name by the jews-only state in palestine. Aren’t such "jews-only" criticisms blatantly wrong because they have got nothing to do with jews outside the jews-only state in palestine? Two points need to be made.

Firstly, some of the jews-only phenomena outlined above refers to jews outside the jews-only state. For example, the jews-only holocaust compensation, the jews-only lies, jews-only taboos, the criticism free jews-only state, the jews-only american media, the jews-only american political system, etc.

Secondly, with some notable exceptions on what is regarded as the political extremes, no mainstream jewish organization anywhere around the world has demanded an end to the jews-only state; criticized the jews-only state’s jews-only policies; opposed jews-only racists from entering the jews-only government; insisted that the jews-only state abides by un resolutions; or asked that the jews-only state gives up its weapons of mass destruction in the same way as these organizations demanded such things of saddam, "Leading pro-Israeli organizations in the United States have pointedly refused to condemn Ariel Sharon's inclusion in his new government of the National Union alliance parties whose members ran for election on a platform openly advocating the "transfer" or ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. The National Union is made up of three parties, Moledet, Tekuma and Israel Beitenu and won seven seats in the recent Israeli election. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which boasts of "90 years fighting anti-Semitism, bigotry and extremism," also remained publicly silent. The very high tolerance for racist and potentially genocidal ideas that Foxman evinces when they come from Israelis is not evident in other, lesser cases. For example, when the far-right Freedom Party made gains in Austria's elections in 2000 on an anti-immigrant platform, Foxman issued a statement saying, "It is astonishing that a significant portion of the [Austrian] population is ready to embrace a party and leadership that espouse xenophobic and nativist positions and statements." (ADL press release, 1 February 2000)." (Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, http://electronicIntifada.net/v2/article1210.shtml 3.3.2003).

In america very few jews have objected to the racism of the jews-only state in palestine so it would seem safe to assume they support what is happening. David horowitz’s extreme racist views are probably common amongst the jewish community in america. Most jews support what gilad atzmon calls the ""lachrymose" view of Jewish history: the inevitability of Jewish suffering at the hands of non-Jews". Given that such a racist view is the basis of the jews-only state in palestine then this suggests that virtually all jews support the jews-only state and its racism. It has been pointed out above that jews all around the world are legally entitled to immigrate to palestine and become citizens of the jews-only state. Their unwillingness to renounce their ‘de-jure’ citizenship of the jews-only state indicates their support for that state. The number of jews outside the jews-only state who have made any criticism of the state’s jews-only policies is so miniscule as to be politically irrelevant. In other words, virtually all jews around the world support the jews-only state in palestine, the racism of the jews-only state, and the jews-only state’s flouting of international law.

Kathleen christison paints an accurate picture of widescale jewish support for the jews-only state in palestine. She starts off by talking about the views of the jewish historian benny morris. "This was a day or two after this paragon of dispassionate Israeli scholarship had expostulated in an interview published in Ha’aretz on the benefits (if you’re Jewish) of ethnic cleansing, the critical miscalculation of David Ben-Gurion in not having completed the total ethnic cleansing of Palestine from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River in 1948 when he had a chance, and the barbarity of Arab and Muslim culture. "The Arab world as it is today is barbarian," Morris declared. Islamic and Arab culture is "a world in which human life doesn’t have the same value as it does in the West," in which freedom and democracy are alien, in which there are "no moral inhibitions." He was speaking in sweeping terms, of entire cultures, of the mass of individuals in the Arab and the Muslim worlds, not merely of governments that are oppressive or undemocratic. Palestinians in particular, Morris believes, are barbaric, "a very sick society," and should be treated "the way we treat individuals who are serial killers. . . . Something like a cage has to be built for them." (Kathleen Christison ‘American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel’ http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/02/1676420.php February 07, 2004).

Morris’s comments are blatantly anti-palestinian and racist, and yet he regards himself as still being a leftist. If leftist jews hold such views then just imagine the views of those on the right of the political spectrum. Christison concludes, "Benny Morris - who still considers himself a leftist, still favors establishment of a Palestinian state in part of Palestine, still exposes Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians in his examination of early Israeli history - is one of those people Meir Kahane was describing, and he speaks for large numbers of his fellow Israelis and his fellow Jews throughout the world. Morris’s blunt soul-bearing has lifted the last barrier of propriety to the open expression of raw Arab hatred. One longs for some gigantic outcry of opposition or disgust over this confession of deep bigotry, but there has been none. Except for a few letters to the editor of Ha’aretz from American Jews, the interview has aroused little attention in the Jewish-American community: no denunciation, no shock, little or no discussion on any but the most progressive Jewish e-mail lists. You have to assume that, however awkward Morris’s blunt language may be, he is speaking for a large segment of American Jews who say they oppose the occupation, say they hate Sharon, say they hate Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians, but who do nothing about any of these things and who in the end would not grieve, either for the Palestinians or for the Jewish soul, if Israel wiped the Palestinians off the map." (Kathleen Christison ‘American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel’ http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/02/1676420.php February 07, 2004).

Michael neumann reaches similar conclusions to christison but from a philosophical standpoint, "Do we want to say it is antisemitic to accuse, not just the Israelis, but Jews generally of complicity in these crimes against humanity? Again, maybe not, because there is a quite reasonable case for such assertions. Compare them, for example, to the claim that Germans generally were complicit in such crimes. This never meant that every last German, man, woman, idiot and child, were guilty. It meant that most Germans were. Their guilt, of course, did not consist in shoving naked prisoners into gas chambers. It consisted in support for the people who planned such acts, or - as many overwrought, moralistic Jewish texts will tell you - for denying the horror unfolding around them, for failing to speak out and resist, for passive consent. Note that the extreme danger of any kind of active resistance is not supposed to be an excuse here. Well, virtually no Jew is in any kind of danger from speaking out. And speaking out is the only sort of resistance required. If many Jews spoke out, it would have an enormous effect. But the overwhelming majority of Jews do not, and in the vast majority of cases, this is because they support Israel. Now perhaps the whole notion of collective responsibility should be discarded; perhaps some clever person will convince us that we have to do this. But at present, the case for Jewish complicity seems much stronger than the case for German complicity. So if it is not racist, and reasonable, to say that the Germans were complicit in crimes against humanity, then it is not racist, and reasonable, to say the same of the Jews. And should the notion of collective responsibility be discarded, it would still be reasonable to say that many, perhaps most adult Jewish individuals support a state that commits war crimes, because that's just true. So if saying these things is antisemitic, than it can be reasonable to be antisemitic. In short, the real scandal today is not antisemitism but the importance it is given. Israel has committed war crimes. It has implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and Jews generally have hastened to implicate themselves. This has provoked hatred against Jews. Why not? Some of this hatred is racist, some isn't, but who cares? Why should we pay any attention to this issue at all?" (Michael Neumann ‘What is Antisemitism?’ http://www.ukar.org/neuman/neuman01.html June 4, 2002).

Gilad atzmon has stated, "Today, knowing that the vast majority of Israelis support the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian population; that most Israelis support Sharon's latest genocide of innocent Palestinians; that the "Jewish state" is the first "democracy" to conduct an ethnic cleansing within its borders; that 100,000 French Jews have gone out into the streets of Paris to show their support for Sharon, we should ask ourselves what is Zionism? What is modern Judaism all about?" (Gilad Atzmon ‘On Blindness’ http://www.gilad.co.uk/html%20files/blindness.html May 2005). Jeff blankfort has concluded, "the distinction that we are always careful to make between being Jewish and being Zionist is essentially deceptive and that while all Jews are not Zionists, the organized Jewish communities throughout the world, despite whatever differences they may have, are totally behind the Zionist project. To pretend that these organizations do not speak for the overall Jewish community, one, that without any doubt, supports Israel as a Jewish state, is illusory." (Quoted in John Spritzler ‘Do Jews Really Rule the World?’ http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Do%20Jews%20Rule_1.htm December 6, 2003).

Paul eisen is clear that most jews are complicit in the crimes of the jews-only state in palestine, "Indeed, almost the entire organised Jewish establishments throughout the western world, in Israel, Europe and North America have used their power, influence and, most importantly, their moral prestige to support Israel in its attempts to subjugate the Palestinians. And not only have they offered their support for these crimes. These same groups and individuals are also telling the rest of the world that it's not really happening, that Israel is not the aggressor, that Israel is not trying to destroy the Palestinian people, that black is white. And not only do they deny this reality, anyone who dares say otherwise is branded an anti-Semite and excluded from society." (Paul Eisen ‘In Sight of Yad Vashem…. Jews and Deir Yassin Remembrance - January 2003). He points out the dangers of such a stance, "The crime against the Palestinian people is being committed by a Jewish state with Jewish soldiers using weapons with Jewish religious symbols all over them, and with the full support and complicity of the overwhelming mass of organised Jews worldwide. But to name Jews as responsible for this crime seems impossible to do. The past is just too terrible. All of us know of the hatred and violence to which accusations against Jews have led in the past. Also, if we were to examine critically the role of Jews in this conflict, what would become of us and of our struggle? Would we be labelled anti-Semites and lose much of the support that we have worked so hard to gain?" (Paul Eisen ‘Jewish Power’ http://www.righteousjews.org/article10.html August 19, 2004). As hannah arendt once argued, "If you do not dissent then you consent."

The jews-only state in palestine and its racist policies are the manifestations of perennial jewish religious belief in their divine chosenness, that as people of the book they should abide only by laws handed down to them by their jews-only god, and their divine superiority over all other races on Earth. Even secular jews uphold the non-religious counterpart of such supremacist attitudes in so much as they believe in the jews-only state in palestine, the racist policies of the jews-only state, and that the jews-only state in palestine should be the only state in the world which is racially pure. All western societies, and most other societies around the world, are becoming increasingly multi-cultural. Only the jews-only state is going in the opposite direction of ethnically cleansing its population to produce a racially pure state.