Welcome to Terra Firm 26 |
||
Only two of the four essays in this issue have been completed but it was decided to post them given the start of the war in iraq. The remaining articles will be posted as time permits. Like previous publications, this issue is concerned to highlight the role played by the zionist state in palestine, the zionist lobbies in america and brutland, the zionist domination of the american and brutish medias and the zionists' global conspiracy for world domination.
|
||
What is Zionism? |
||
A Homeland for the Jews.
In the late 19thc, theodore herzl formulated a
new political ideology called zionism. He promoted the creation of a religious
jewish state in what was formerly called israel. He founded the world
zionist organization to promote this ideology. The early zionists believed that jews would be able to practice their religious beliefs
without restriction only
in the zionist state. They hoped that once the state had been created,
all jews around the world would return to their ancient homeland - thereby
ending nearly two thousand years of the jewish diaspora. After the establishment
of the zionist state in palestine in 1948, zionist ideology became dedicated to
protecting and promoting the interests of the zionist state.
The Sacred Land of Israel.
Zionism promotes the religious idea that the land in palestine is sacred because god has given the land to his chosen people, the jews. Zionists believe it is the holy duty of all jews to return to the land that god has given them in order to protect, by force if need be, that land and keep it sacred.
It has to be emphasized that zionists' sole claim to the
land belonging to palestinians is, supposedly, that god had given the
land to the jews. It may be just a coincidence but this fictitious entity
had also been invented by jews. So, today, for the sake of an entirely
imaginary being concocted by a group of jews a couple of thousand years
ago, the zionist state sends in tanks and fighter aircraft to devastate
the homes of innocent palestinian citizens in order to force them to leave
the sacred land of palestine, and then justifies what it is doing as divine
retribution. Clearly, jews have been in the public relations/spin business
for a very long time.
A Palestinian-Free Palestine.
One of the basic tenets of zionism is that the only people entitled to live on god's sacred land are jews. As far as zionists are concerned, the land of zion is sacred and should not be sullied by non-jews such as palestinians. This is why zionists destroy all traces of palestinian occupation of the land once zionists have expropriated palestinian land and occupied the area. The jews were once pushed into what was called the holes of oblivion - now the zionists are pushing the palestinians through these holes of oblivion by eradicating all traces of their existence.
In other words, zionism is an ideology which demands the expropriation of all palestinian property and the deportation of millions of palestinians from their own homeland. It is the holy duty of jews to rid the land of all non-jews - once again by force if need be. Herzl once stated, "Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment... Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly." According to tom segev, "The idea of transfer had accompanied the Zionist movement from its very beginnings, first appearing in Theodore Herzl's diary. In practice, the Zionists began executing a mini-transfer from the time they began purchasing the land and evacuating the Arab tenants.... "Disappearing" the Arabs lay at the heart of the Zionist dream, and was also a necessary condition of its existence.... With few exceptions, none of the Zionists disputed the desirability of forced transfer or its morality."
It is the jewish god which compels zionists to oppress and humiliate the palestinians; expropriate palestinian land; murder or, at the very least deport, as many palestinians as possible; and then destroy all traces of their existence. To zionists, it is irrelevant how long palestinians have been living on their own land because god has given this land to the jews and s/he has given her/his people a divine right to use whatever violence is needed to reclaim it. To zionists, divine rights not only take precedence over ooman rights, they are the only rights that need to be considered. Religious zionists such as ariel sharon believe in divine laws and are utterly contemptuous of the united nations and its man-made laws. Zionists therefore provoke palestinian violence in order to make feasible such expropriation and deportation.
Individuals Advocating a Palestinian-Free Palestine.
bronxcheerdubya
"The Jordan River is the natural border between Eretz Israel, the land of Israel, and Jordan, all so-called "palestinians" must be moved east of the Jordan River, east of Eden so to speak, for there to be peace." Creveld, Martin van.
"In April 2002, leading Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld held that a U.S. attack on Iraq would provide the cover for Prime Minister Sharon to forcibly remove the Palestinians from the West Bank. In Creveld's view, "The expulsion of the Palestinians would require only a few brigades," which would rely on "heavy artillery."" Kleiner, Michael & Elon, Benny - Knesset Politicians.
"The Israeli ruling coalition includes parties that promote "transfer" of the Palestinian population as a solution to what they call "the demographic problem." Politicians are regularly quoted in the media as suggesting forcible expulsion, most recently [Knesset members] Michael Kleiner and Benny Elon, as reported on Yediot Ahronot website on September 19, 2002." Mason, Jackie.
"We have paralyzed ourselves by our sickening fear of "World Opinion," which is why we find it impossible to face one simple fact: We will never win this war unless we immediately threaten to drive every Arab out of Israel if the killing doesnt stop." Mason and Felder blame the entire Palestinian-Israeli conflict on Palestinian wickedness and hatred of Jews, and ignore completely Israel's decades of dispossession, occupation, repression and killings of Palestinians in far greater numbers than Israelis who have been killed in the conflict, to say nothing of the clear imperative for Israel to stop violating international law." "In addition to enormous critical acclaim for his comedy, Mason's website states that, "the academic world bowed to Mason as prestigious Oxford University established the "Jackie Mason Lectureship in Contemporary Judaic and Hebraic Studies" for Postgraduate study. More recently, in 1995, Mason was awarded with an honorary degree of "Fellow in the Humanities" of Yarnton College at the University of Oxford."" Morris, Benny.
"Even the dean of Israel's revisionist historians, Benny Morris, explicitly endorsed the expulsion of the Palestinians in the event of war. "This land is so small," Morris exclaimed, "that there isn't room for two peoples. In fifty or a hundred years, there will only be one state between the sea and the Jordan. That state must be Israel."" Sharon, Ariel.
.. sharon has invited into his cabinet the leaders of a party which openly calls for the mass expulsion of the palestinians from the west bank; a racist demand which if implemented would lead to a thousand year war in the region. The bush administration has never expressed any opinion on this disgraceful concession."; "As Bush and his people came into office in January 2001, press reports in Israel quoted government officials and politicians speaking openly of mass expulsion of the Palestinians. Ariel Sharon was elected prime minister of Israel in February 2001; noted for his ruthlessness, he had said in the past that Jordan should become the Palestinian state where Palestinians removed from Israeli territory would be relocated." Ya'alon, Moshe.
"In a recent interview in Ha'aretz, Chief of Staff Moshe Ya'alon described the Palestinians as a "cancerous manifestation" and equated the military actions in the Occupied Territories with "chemotherapy," suggesting that more radical "treatment" may be necessary. Prime Minister Sharon has backed this "assessment of reality." Escalating racist demagoguery concerning the Palestinian citizens of Israel may indicate the scope of the crimes that are possibly being contemplated."
Political Parties/Groups Advocating a Palestinian-Free Palestine.
Armey, Dick.
"Last night on MSNBC's popular program Hardball, House Republican Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-TX) recommended the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their land and endorsed Israel's illegal conquests of the occupied territories." Gamla.
Gamla is a group founded by former zionist military officers and settlers. On 3 July 2002 its website published an article entitled "The logistics of transfer" by Boris Shusteff. "An Israeli organization has published detailed plans for the "complete elimination of the Arab demographic threat to Israel" by forcibly expelling all Palestinians, including Palestinians in the occupied territories and Palestinian citizens of Israel from the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea within a 3-5 year period." Gamla receives tax deductible contributions from a New York-based charity that claims that its goal is greater Arab-Jewish tolerance. Gush Emunim.
"In the mid 1970s, a group of Orthodox Israelis founded a movement called Gush Emunim, the "Bloc of the Faithful." They believed that it was a religious obligation for Jews to own and settle the entire Land of Israel, which the Torah defines as including the West Bank. Although the government severely limited such Jewish settlements, the movement was encouraged by General Ariel Sharon and they began establishing small communities." Meir Kahane - Kach ("Only Thus") Party - Baruch Goldstein.
"The guy who really put us on the human rights blacklist was an Orthodox rabbi named Meir Kahane. Back in 1968 he organized Jewish kids in Brooklyn into a vigilante group called the Jewish Defense League (JDL) to protect little old Jewish ladies from muggers. (Kahane moved to Israel). He promptly went into politics and regularly lambasted the government for being soft on the Arabs. Kahane preached that it was impossible for a real Jewish state to be democratic because Arab inhabitants shouldn't be considered citizens or allowed to vote. In fact, Kahane wanted the Arabs expelled from all of biblical Israel. God gave the entire Land of Israel to the Jews, he said, and if the Arabs and rest of the world don't like it, too bad. So, Kahane founded the Kach ("Only Thus") Party, organized protests against the government, and encouraged the violent harassment of Palestinians in the West Bank. By 1994 the government was so fed up it branded Kach a terrorist organization and barred its members from running for office. The last straw was Kach's statements in support of Dr. Baruch Goldstein's attack on the mosque in the Cave of the Patriarchs in February 1994. Baruch Goldstein. He was the Israeli settler, closely affiliated with Kach, who horrified the world when he slaughtered 29 Palestinians and wounded more than 60 as they prayed. Guess what Goldstein called "the old country"? That's right. He grew up in Brooklyn and was considered an outstanding student at Yeshiva University and Albert Einstein Medical College. Those are just the top two of the Brooklynites featured in the more sordid chapters of our recent past. There are plenty of others. So many, in fact, that rational Israelis consider the kooks from Brooklyn "America's worst export to Israel."" Moledet (homeland) party.
In 1991, during the first proxy zionist war against iraq, the zionist government co-opted yet another racist into the cabinet, "Yitzhak Shamir appointed Rehavam Ze'evi, the leader of the extremist Moledet (homeland) party, who supports the removal of Palestinians from the occupied territories, as minister without portfolio in the policy making inner cabinet." This crypto nazi once said, "We don't want to see Arabs in our streets and cities." Thankfully palestinian freedom fighters executed this crypto-nazi. National Union Alliance parties - Moledet, Tekuma and Israel Beitenu.
.. "the National Union alliance parties whose members ran for election on a platform openly advocating the "transfer" -- or ethnic cleansing -- of the Palestinians. The National Union is made up of three parties, Moledet, Tekuma and Israel Beitenu and won seven seats in the recent Israeli election. ("The National Religious Party which, though it opposes a Palestinian state and supports continued colony construction, has not openly advocated transfer.") (The racist zionist elections in february 2003 resulted in the following: the secular Shinui Party, 15 seats; the pro-settlement National Religious Party, with six seats; and the ultranationalist National Union party [or Yisrael Beitenu Party], with seven seats. There is also an ultra-Orthodox Shas party). Oded Yinon and the World Zionist Organization.
"It was during the 1980s, with the coming to power of the right-wing Likud government, that the idea of expulsion resurfaced publicly. And this time it was directly tied to a larger war, with destabilization of the Middle East seen as a precondition for Palestinian expulsion. Such a proposal, including removal of the Palestinian population, was outlined in an article by Oded Yinon, titled "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s," appearing in the World Zionist Organization's periodical Kivunim in February 1982. Yinon had been attached to the Israeli Foreign Ministry and his article undoubtedly reflected high-level thinking in the Israeli military and intelligence establishment. The article called for Israel to bring about the dissolution and fragmentation of the Arab states into a mosaic of ethnic groupings." USA Today.
"Last May, Dick Armey the most senior Republican in the United States Congress openly advocated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians on MSNBC's Hardball, while the usually bland USA Today newspaper published a February op-ed by one Emanuel Winston calling for the "resettling" of the Palestinians in Jordan. Neither of these calls elicited the slightest protest from mainstream commentators and politicians in the United States."
Those Condoning a Palestinian-Free Palestine.
Clinton, Hillary.
"When Hillary Clinton, New York's "liberal" Senator, visited Israel earlier this year, she was hosted by and warmly embraced Benny Elon, the leader of the Moledet ethnic cleansing party."
Zionist Nazism.
Zionism is inherently racist since it believes only jews should be allowed to live on god's land. It promotes what is called, in modern parlance, ethnic cleansing, "The late Professor Israel Shahak, a Jew and Chairperson of the Israeli League for Civil and Human Rights has been equally explicit about Israel's and Zionism's racism. He said: "It is my considered opinion that the State of Israel is a racist state in the full meaning of the term. In this state people are discriminated against, in the most permanent and legal way and in the most important areas of life, only because of their origin. This racist discrimination began in Zionism and is carried out today mainly in co-operation with the institutions of the Zionist Movement."" In more traditional political terms, it is a form of crypto-nazism. Ariel sharon is not merely a mass murderer, he's a crypto-nazi - like many other members of his cabinet.
Zionist Colonialism.
Zionism is a colonialist doctrine since the land that god gave to the jews goes far beyond the current borders of the zionist state in palestine. Zionists are intent on reclaiming all of their sacred land - they regard united nations' resolutions limiting the borders of the zionist state as irrelevant. To religious zionists, god determines which areas are sacred and thus belong to the jews, not the united nations. Bronxcheerdubya.
"Israel was a much bigger state in Biblical times, stretching from "the 2 rivers", the Tigris and the Euphrates, in ancient Sumeria, the land Abraham was born in at Ur ..." Dayan, Moshe.
"And as far back as 1952 Moshe Dayan, the present Israeli defense minister, declared: "Our task consists of preparing the Israeli army for the new war approaching in order to achieve our ultimate goal, the creation of an Israeli empire." Henshaw, John Mitchell.
"The metamorphosis of tiny Israel from a midget to a giant is in the making. The grand design of Judaic-Zionist expansionist doctrine is to seize all the oil-rich lands from the shores of the Euphrates to the banks of the Nile. In defining the aims of Zionism, Hebrew scholar Levnoch Osman recently said: "In our eternal Book of Books (the Torah), the lofty ethical teachings of which are cherished by all mankind, the land of Israel is described not as a long, narrow strip of land with wavy, crooked borders, but as a state with broad natural borders. God has promised to Patriarch Abraham the following: "I give unto them the land where they have sown their seed, from the river of Egypt unto the great river of Euphrates (Genesis 15:18). And so, in order to realize the words of this prophecy, the Israeli state had to continue, not in the borders it has today but within its broad historical boundaries."" Palestineremembered.
"Finally, the exact borders of the "Promised Land" have not been geographically defined. The Biblical "Promise", which was given by Abraham to his descendents, bordered the areas between the Nile River in Egypt and the Euphrates River in Iraq. Does that imply that Israel's future borders eventually will span the borders of Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, and Southern Turkey? Could that explain why Israel has neither a constitution nor a properly defined borders? Having such vast borders, does that imply a Biblical prophecy too? Could that justify why Israel has invaded and occupied neighboring states? Since the "Promise Land" includes southern Lebanon, was invading and occupying Lebanon part of this prophecy?"
The Religious Nature of the Zionist State.
In western, liberal, democracies, there is a separation between church and state. This is necessary because they are multi-cultural societies. Multi-cultural societies require a separation of church and state so that people of all religions, and none, can participate fully in the country's political system.
There is no separation between church and state in the zionist state in palestine. Zionists believe that judaism should dictate the state's social policies. The objective of the zionist state is to implement judaic/talmudic/rabbinical laws. According to chad powers, in the zionist state in palestine, "Orthodox Judaism rules civil administrative society. Jews are even legally forbidden from marrying non-Jews in the Jewish state. Public transportation shuts down on Saturday -- for Christians and Muslims alike -- because it's the Jewish day of rest. Want to change your religion in Israel? You'll have to go to a government office, and if you're Jewish the officials there will try to make you change your mind." The religious nature of the zionist state alienates not only christians and palestinians, who are expected to abide by the laws of an alien religion, but secular jews. John mitchell henshaw states, "Full citizenship requires membership in the Jewish religion and Jewish ancestry. Israeli authorities refuse to accept Arabs or "Gentiles" (non-Jews) as full citizens with equal civil, political, and economic rights."
Zionists' determination to create a religious state in palestine is indicative of the fact that they are intent on creating a racist society free of all non-jews. Zionists' objectives are to create a racially pure, palestinian-free, religious state run along talmudic lines.
The Inherent Violence of Zionism.
The Zionist State's Covert Aggression.
Even prior to the creation of the zionist state, zionists realized the only way they could create a zionist state and reclaim god's sacred land was through the use of violence during times of chaos and disorder when people's objections to violence would be muted. Zionist expansionism, the goal of colonizing all the land given to them by a fictitious god, could be achieved only through provoking a perpetual state of emergency which would enable zionists to justify, to their own citizens and the international community, the continued use of violence, "In the late 1930s, David Ben-Gurion wrote: "What is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times; and if at this time the opportunity is missed and what is possible in such great hours is not carried out a whole world is lost.""
The zionists' policy of promoting social instability to justify the use of violence was eventually formulated into a doctrine called covert aggression - in modern parlance, 'preemptive action' or unilateralism. The personal diary of moshe sharett, who was Israeli's first Foreign Minister from 1948-1956, and prime minister from 1954-1956 was used as the basis for a 63-page on line monograph by livia rokach called 'Israel's Sacred Terrorism. This was published in1980 despite the zionist state's attempt to suppress it. Rokach argued that the zionist state's image of vulnerability was a ruse, "Israel has always planned to become the dominant power in the region, and "invented dangers" in order to dupe its citizens and provoke wars. In his diary, Sharett quotes a conversation with Army Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan in May 1955:"We face no danger at all of an Arab advantage of force for the next 8-10 years...Reprisal actions which we couldn't carry out if we were tied to a security pact are our vital lymph...they make it possible for us to maintain a high level of tension in our population and in the army. Without these actions we would have ceased to be a combative people... " Sharett concludes: "The state.... must see the sword as the main if not the only, instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may, no it MUST invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation and revenge.... And above all, let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space. This policy of "reprisals" or "provocation and revenge" was also called "covert aggression." The U.S. "war on terror" is a continuation of it. Essentially it involves disguising a policy of aggression as retaliation for sham provocations. For example, Israeli patrols would cross the border to attack Jordanians or Egyptians, and then claim the actions took place in Israel. Once attacked, the army pursued the "aggressors" into enemy territory and wreaked havoc." The zionists in the american administration have provoked the country into a war against iraq for what are completely bogus reasons.
The zionist state has continually provoked palestinians into violence as an excuse to expropriate palestinian land and has provoked arab countries into military action to create enable the zionist state to grab more land and push its borders out to what is called Greater Israel. One of the ways in which the zionist state stirs up palestinian violence is through the random killing of palestinian civilians. These incidents are not reported in the zionist dominated brutish media, "In an ADL press release which was published today you are quoted as expressing "outrage" at Gush Shalom's portrayal of Prime Minister Barak as a killer of Palestinian children in a caricature on its web site, and as stating that "The image of a militant Barak standing on the bleeding bullet-ridden body of a Palestinian child is abhorrent". We fully share your feelings of outrage and abhorrence - outrage and abhorrence not at a cartoon, a few bytes of virtual reality, but at the true cruel reality which that cartoon faithfully reflects. A reality being enacted day after day after day in the Occupied Territories, a reality of Israeli military snipers taking careful aim with their telescopic sights and shooting high-velocity ammunition at unarmed opponents - men and women, boys and girls. Snipers aiming carefully at the upper part of the body, shooting with deliberation and the full intention of causing death or grave injury. One of these snipers spoke on prime time Israeli TV two weeks ago, describing quite frankly what he is about."
Ariel Sharon's Early Days as a Terrorist.
Ariel sharon was a highly trained terrorist long before going into politics. He was the leader of a jewish 'einzatsgruppen' death squad which murdered innocent palestinian civilians in order to provoke further palestinian violence, "Ariel Sharon was the leader of a squad ("Unit 101") that specialized in these murderous forays. His 1953 raid on the Jordanian village of Kibiyah killed dozens of civilians."; ... "the late Lt. Colonel Shlomo Baum, a founder of Israel's notorious Unit 101, which with the young Ariel Sharon as its leader carried out the brutal massacre of dozens of civilians in the Palestinian village of Qibya in 1954, among other atrocities." Sharon was personally murdering palestinian civilians a long time before he went into politics and ordered the zionist military to increase the rate at which they were murdering innocent palestinian civilians. As prime minister he is simply putting into practice policies learnt during his terrorist years, "The article called for Israel to bring about the dissolution and fragmentation of the Arab states into a mosaic of ethnic groupings. Thinking along those lines, Ariel Sharon stated on March 24, 1988, that if the Palestinian uprising continued, Israel would have to make war on her Arab neighbors. The war, he stated, would provide "the circumstances" for the removal of the entire Palestinian population from the West Bank and Gaza and even from inside Israel proper." Sharon has become the arch exponent of 'covert aggression'. America is not leading a war against terrorism - it is fighting a war on behalf of a terrorist and a terrorist state
Michael Ledeen: Global Terrorist.
The modern, and globalized, version of the zionists' policy of 'covert aggression' is the 'ledeen doctrine" outlined by ex-pentagon official michael ledeen. This aims to use the american military to carry out in the arab world what the zionist military cannot currently implement for political reasons. In ledeen's own words, "First and foremost, we must bring down the terror regimes, beginning with the Big Three: Iran, Iraq, and Syria. And then we have to come to grips with Saudi Arabia.
Once the tyrants in Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Saudi Arabia have been brought down, we will remain engaged.
We have to ensure the fulfillment of the democratic revolution.
Stability is an unworthy American mission, and a misleading concept to boot. We do not want stability in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and even Saudi Arabia; we want things to change. The real issue is not whether, but how to destabilize. Rejecting stability as "an unworthy American mission," Ledeen goes on to define Americas authentic "historic mission": Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace.
[W]e must destroy them to advance our historic mission."
From the moment of its foundation, the zionist state has been more of a military organization than a democratic one in order to carry out its policy of covert aggression. To a large extent, the zionist state in palestine is a military state. Ran ha-cohen has argued that, "Israeli commentators lament that Israel is not a democracy. They say its security establishment has hijacked the country. One pundit remarked, "Israel is not a state with an army, but an army with an affiliated state." They also lament that a culture of corruption, brutality and immorality pervades the army."
See also 5.1.4:
Local Examples of Zionists’ Dominance over the American Media and Political
Process.
Hyping Examples of Anti-Semitism.
Ever since the formulation of the zionist ideology, zionists have realized that one of the main ways of coaxing jews back to the land of zion has been by presenting the world as being full of anti-semites - and given the jewish dominance of the media it has not been difficult to portray the world in this way. The more they can convince diasporan jews that the world is full of anti-semites, the better their chance of persuading them to return to their homeland where they would be safe from their enemies. In other words, it has been in the political interests of zionists to stimulate anti-semitism around the world. In most instances, zionists provoke anti-semitism primarily by hyping up minor anti-semitic incidents in order to create the impression that anti-semitism is rife in all corners of the world.
Stirring up Anti-Semitism.
Another tactic used by zionists is provoking people into making anti-semitic comments which they can then use to prove to jews around the world that the world is full of anti-semites.
Fabricating Examples of Anti-Semitism.
There are examples, however, where zionists simply make up stories about anti-semitism. For example, the anti defamation league (adl) publicized the alleged anti-semitic comments of a couple engaged in a neighbourhood quarrel. They didn't check the story, they just used the incident to promote the idea, around the world, of the prevalence of anti-semitism. Fortunately the couple took the adl to court, won the case and were awarded $10 million in damages, "A ruling by a federal judge in Denver March 31 which upheld most of a year-old $10 million jury finding that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) libeled a couple by falsely portraying them as anti-Semites may at last call into question the groups heretofore unassailable reputation as the sole "defender of the Jews" in America. Upholding most of a $10 million defamation suit against the Anti- Defamation League, a federal judge in Denver has lambasted the organization for labeling a nasty neighborhood feud as an anti-Semitic event. In upholding the first-ever court defeat handed to the 87-year-old ADL, U.S. District Judge Edward Nottingham said the organization had endorsed and publicized the bigotry accusations of a Jewish couple against its neighbors without either investigating the case or weighing the consequences."
Prior to the rise of the nazis, zionists' traditional way of promoting anti-semitism was by suggesting that gentiles had an implacable and immutable hatred for the jews. After the second world war, zionists promoted anti-semitism by claiming that all non-jews are nazis i.e. people who are just biding their time before carrying out the next slaughter of jewish people. Norman finkelstein has explained, "In chapter 2, I critically scrutinize the central dogmas of Holocaust ideology: (1) The Holocaust marks a categorically unique event, and (2) The Holocaust marks the climax of an irrational, eternal Gentile hatred of Jews. According to the complementary Holocaust dogma of "eternal Gentile hatred," Jews were exterminated during World War II because all Gentiles, be it as active perpetrators or as passive collaborators, wanted them dead. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's ponderous effort to prove one variant of this dogma in Hitler's Willing Executioners lacked scholarly value. But like the "uniqueness" doctrine, it has proven to be politically useful. To account for criticism of Israel, American writer Cynthia Ozick had a ready answer: "The world wants to wipe out the Jews...the world has always wanted to wipe out the Jews." Indeed this dogma confers total license: intent as the Gentiles always are on murdering Jews, Jews have every right to protect themselves, however they see fit. Deploring the "Holocaust lesson" of eternal Gentile hatred, respected Israeli scholar Boas Evron observes that it is "really tantamount to a deliberate breeding of paranoia....This mentality...condones in advance any inhuman treatment of non-Jews, for the prevailing mythology is that 'all people collaborated with the Nazis in the destruction of Jewry,' hence everything is permissible to Jews in their relationship to other peoples."
Zionists aren't just intent on hyping up anti-semitic incidents for all they're worth. They go far beyond this by deliberately provoking anti-semitism so that they can use it to prove that the world really is anti-semitic. To give but one example: in the early 1990s, zionists began demanding vast reparations from european governments for jewish (only) survivors of the nazi concentration camps. They used american economic and political power to force swiss banks into paying over a billion dollars in reparations. This led to an outbreak of anti-semitism in switzerland. And yet, according to the zionist holocaust industry, there was no connection between the two, "Yet this ominous development couldnt possibly be connected with the Holocaust industrys shakedown of switzerland." The zionists then blackmailed other european countries into paying out reparations. In every country where this extortion racket was carried out there was an outbreak of anti-semitism, "The shakedown of switzerland and germany has been only a prelude to the grand finale: the shakedown of eastern europe. Pursuing this end with reckless and ruthless abandon, it has become the main fomentor of anti-semitism in europe." If zionists involved in the holocaust extortion racket were in the least bit bothered about anti-semitism then they would never have tried to extort money in this way.
Zionists not interested in Peace with the Palestinians or the Arab World.
Religiously minded, crypto-nazi, zionists have no intention of making peace with palestinians because they want palestinians off their sacred land, "Israel's largest-circulation daily newspaper, Yediot Aharonot, reported Wednesday that the leadership of the Tanzim terrorist organization had met in Jenin Monday night and voted to declare a unilateral cease-fire in its terrorist war against Israel. This is the most prestigious Jewish newspaper in America, and it is saying that the bombing was intended to kill the peace process. Ariel Sharon does not want the terrorists to stop terrorizing Israel or he might have to sit down with the Palestinians and negotiate a Palestinian state. We already know his right-wing Likudniks voted a few months back at a party rally almost unanimously against a Palestinian state."
Similarly, they have no intention of making peace with their arab neighbours because they want to push out the borders of the zionist state to include all god's sacred land. Since the 1960s america has posed as an arbiter between the zionists and the palestinians. However. the more that the american government becomes dominated by the zionist lobby, the more opportunity the zionist state in palestine has to implement its crypto-nazi policies. The power of the zionist lobby in america is difficult to assess but can be gauged roughly by the dominance of the zionist state over the palestinians. The more the zionist state oppresses palestinians, the greater the dominance of the zionist lobby over the american government.
Zionists Can't Lose.
Ever since the foundation of the zionist state, a succession of crypto-nazi, zionist prime ministers (some of whom were terrorists before they went into politics) have pursued a policy of covert aggression - provoking palestinian violence as an excuse to expropriate palestinian land and, on the other hand, provoking arab countries into wars in order to reclaim more of god's land. They have also sought to foster anti-semitism around the world. The zionists are in a no-lose situation. The greater their racist oppression of the palestinian people, the more they provoke palestinian violence, the more land they are able to expropriate from the palestinians, the greater the anti-semitism they foster around the world, the more jews who emigrate to palestine .... where they join in the crypto-nazi expropriation and deportation process.
Dual Loyalties? America's Zionist Fifth Columnists.
It is commonplace amongst revisionists that zionists in american politics have dual loyalties to america and the zionist state in palestine. Even jewish commentators remark on these loyalties, "The Israeli commentator Akiva Eldar recently observed frankly in a Ha'aretz column that Perle, Feith, and their fellow strategists "are walking a fine line between their loyalty to American governments and Israeli interests." The suggestion of dual loyalties is not a verboten subject in the Israeli press, as it is in the United States."
It has to be suggested, however, that zionists in the american government have no dual loyalties - they are loyal only to the zionist state in palestine. They are perfectly willing to plunder the west's resources in order to prop up a bankrupt zionist state. The most exemplary fifth columnist was robert maxwell who plundered the life savings of ordinary people in britain, whom he often referred to as the natives, in order to funnel money into the zionist state. Maxwell also used his newspapers to encourage brutish people to lay down their lives for the zionist cause in the first zionist proxy war against iraq in 1991.
Zionists in the american administration are not merely racists, they are fifth columnists. They are traitors to the country they live in. They do not hesitate to promote policies that harm their host country if these policies are beneficial to the zionist state. According to anne pettifer, "Vidal calls Podhoretz and his ilk Fifth Columnists (Israeli division) to indicate their extra-territorial priorities. They pursue political power not in order to make the US a better place, to right wrongs or to fight inequality here, but to promote Israel's pre-eminence in the Middle East, to confine Palestinians to a couple of Bantustans or, better still, engineer their expulsion to Jordan." The 1991 war against iraq was the first proxy zionist war in which the zionists forced allied countries to lay down the lives of their soldiers, and expend resources, simply to protect the zionist state.
Zionist sympathizers living outside the zionist state, claim they are anti-racists - whilst giving full support to the racist policies of the zionist state. Their anti-racist stance in their adopted countries helps them to get away with promoting the racism of the zionist state.
Zionists' Poisoning Global Relationships.
After the second world war, the americans proclaimed themselves as the world's great liberators and the protectors of freedom and democracy. It seemed possible that the basis of its own political constitution, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, would be promoted in troublespots around the world. However, american governments started protecting the zionist state, its international reputation has been besmirched by the racist atrocities carried out by the zionist state. The support that american governments have given the zionist state has tainted them thoroughly, and unmistakably, with racism, "Then, there's our unexplained display of servility at the Security Council in the United Nations. Despite overwhelming evidence of Israel's human rights violations, why did Washington vigorously defend Israel by labeling criticisms of its racism as "anti- Semitism" thereby sacrificing America's international credibility and alienating 150 other nations?"
In march 2003, the zionists in the american government pushed the country into a war with iraq that is likely to be followed by further wars against other arab/moslem countries. Although the american government may have believed originally it could win the support of all countries around the world for this action, as it did in 1990, this did not turn out to be the case. On the contrary, it ran into considerable opposition from what was labelled 'old europe' i.e. russia, france, and germany. The zionist dominated american government continues to promote its anti-iraq policy even though it is undermining nato, the united nations, and international law. The american government's appalling treatment of prisoners removed from afghanistan confirms yet again its dismissal of international law. Ann pettifer has argued, "And on the BBC World Service, The Washington Times' Barry Fein proclaimed war as absolutely necessary, saying that from now on the US would decide what constituted international law. There is real madness here, but who will stop it? Zionists in the american government have little or no interest in nato, the united nations, or international law. They are quite willing to cause serious divisions within the international community over the war against iraq and the middle east. They are poisoning america's traditional relationships around the world solely for the benefit of the zionist state. There is no price that the zionists believe is too high for america to pay in order to create the conditions in which it might be possible for the zionist state in palestine to bring about the creation of a palestinian-free palestine. Zionists would love to see the abolition of the united nations so the global community will never again be able to come together and denounce the zionist state in palestine as racist.
Wayne madsen has concluded, "Junior Bush's messianic call to arms has upset the world economy, rendered 40 year military and economic alliances practically meaningless, soured world public opinion against the United States, triggered political crises in the Britain and Spain, and caused serious rifts within the U.S. and British military and intelligence structures. The intelligence revolt is so serious, a Top Secret National Security Agency tasking memo was featured in Britain's The Observer newspaper thanks to high-level authorized leaks." The more zionists there are in the american administration, the more they infect american foreign policies with the unilateralist views that have been pervasive in the zionist state since its creation, and the more they will poison civilized international relationships.
Zionists' Short Term Goals.
The zionists' short term goal is to use american military power to conquer a number of arab/moslem countries. This will enable them to install not merely moderate, but zionist-compliant, political regimes which should bring to an end all arab support for palestinian freedom fighters. The zionists in the american government will then use the american military to round up, imprison, or exterminate, all islamic extremists.
Zionists' Medium Term Goals.
The aim of these zionist-compliant arab/moslem governments will be to create capitalist societies with a modern, western, culture. This will mean trying to win public acceptance for macdonalds, disney, hollywood, and the gambling, alcohol, and sex, industries. This will require them to curb the power of the mullahs. In other words, the american government led arab/moslem regimes will try to enforce a complete cultural make-over of arab/moslem countries so they are little different from their western (christian) counterparts. They will try to roll-back popular support for islam. In the 1960s and 1970s afghanistan, under russian influence, was becoming a modern westernized society - women wore western clothes rather than the veil. These are the sort of changes that zionists in the american government want to see throughout the arab world. Whilst this religious-zionist inspired, secular crusade for the cultural, political, and economic, transformation of the arab/moslem world is taking place, the zionist state in palestine would attempt to forcibly deport all palestinians. The secularizing of arab/moslem countries will mean that the only religious state left in the region would be the zionist state in palestine.
Gamla is a group founded by former zionist military officers and settlers. Its website contains an article by boris shusteff 'The logistics of Transfer'. According to ali abunimah this article provides detailed plans for the "complete elimination of the Arab demographic threat to Israel" by forcibly expelling all Palestinians, including Palestinians in the occupied territories and Palestinian citizens of Israel from the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea within a 3-5 year period.". What is pertinent here is that the article also suggests another, rarely discussed, solution to the palestinian problem, "Israeli Arabs can be given one more option - to convert to Judaism if they prefer to stay put." Some zionists also seem to believe this would be the best solution to all the problems in the middle east.
Zionists' Long Term Goals.
The zionist state is highly militarized in order to protect the jews living within its borders. However, it suffers from two fundamental weaknesses. First, its military reliance on the americans. Secondly, its inability to protect all jews around the world. Zionists' long term goals are to develop weapons of mass destruction that can threaten any country around the world in order to protect all jews around the world.
The zionists have developed medium range weapons which can reach almost any country in the middle east. But they are also developing long range missiles which could pose a threat to russia, europe, china, and even, quite surprisingly, the united states. They have already launched satellite systems which circle the Earth. According to yoichi clark, "Israel is midway through a drive to establish a space program, much of it devoted to military purposes." Zionists are determined that if any country attempts another mass slaughter of jews then they will destroy that country, and perhaps, take the whole world down with them.
In the 1960s when russia was a superpower it possessed a fairly efficient, vastly powerful, military machine and would not have worried unduly about the acquisition by the zionist state of a tiny number of nuclear weapons. However, the zionists were planning to develop a nuclear capability that would enable it to defend itself against a threat posed by russia, "American-born Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard obtained satellite-imaging data of the Soviet Union, allowing Israel to target accurately Soviet cities. This showed Israel's intention to use its nuclear arsenal as a deterrent political lever, or retaliatory capability against the Soviet Union itself." From the late 1980s onwards, such has been the political and economic decline of russia, and such has been the prodigous development of zionist nuclear, and missile, technologies that these days the zionist state is beginning to pose an increasingly serious threat to this former superpower. The existence of a zionist state with a plethora of powerful nuclear weapons on the russians' doorstep has gone far beyond the realms of a modern cuban missile crisis in the middle east. It's a little difficult to credit it but basically a country with a mere six million people is getting closer and closer to annihilatory-parity with a country of 120 million. Perhaps, one of the reasons that russia would not support the zionist occupied governments' attack on iraq in march 2003 was that it would give the zionists even greater military supremacy in the region.
The ultimate goal of the zionist state, however, is to become so powerful that even the united states will fear to challenge it. According to warner d. farr, the zionists are as good technically at developing nuclear weapons as the americans or the russians, "Mordechai Vanunu provided the best look at the Israeli nuclear arsenal in 1985 complete with photographs. A technician from Dimona who lost his job, Vanunu secretly took photographs, immigrated to Australia and published some of his material in the London Sunday Times. He was subsequently kidnapped by Israeli agents, tried and imprisoned. His data shows a sophisticated nuclear program, over 200 bombs, with boosted devices, neutron bombs, F-16 deliverable warheads, and Jericho warheads. The boosted weapons shown in the Vanunu photographs show a sophistication that inferred the requirement for testing. He revealed for the first time the underground plutonium separation facility where Israel was producing 40 kilograms annually, several times more than previous estimates. Photographs showed sophisticated designs which scientific experts say enabled the Israelis to build bombs with as little as 4 kilograms of plutonium. These facts have increased the estimates of total Israeli nuclear stockpiles (see Appendix A). In the words of one American, "[the Israelis] can do anything we or the Soviets can do." Vanunu not only made the technical details of the Israeli program and stockpile public but in his wake, Israeli began veiled official acknowledgement of the potent Israeli nuclear deterrent. They began bringing the bomb up the basement stairs if not out of the basement."
The zionist state in palestine seems to be able to obtain almost any weapons it wants from the american government (and to obtain military weapons' designs illegally through spies and zionists in positions of power in america). The american government is perfectly willing to provide most types of weapons to the zionist state because it sees the zionists as their allies in a turbulent region - the fact that it is the zionists who are causing this turbulence is deemed irrelevant. With each transfer of weapons, the zionists become stronger and stronger. The zionists in the american government have sent the american military into the middle east where they hope it will wage a long term war against arab/moslem countries - devastating each country in virtually the same way as the americans devastated afghanistan. For the zionists, another major advantage of this conflict is that america might expend such a huge amount of time, effort, and resources, in the middle east that it will gradually become much weaker. If the zionists manage to extract more and more weapons from the americans during this period, for example, as the price of not interfering in any of these wars, then gradually they will considerably reduce the huge disparity in military power between themselves and the americans. There will be a another considerable reduction in the disparity between the zionist state and the american state if the zionists manage to develop intercontinental ballistic missiles that could reach america for this will enable them to pose a considerable military threat to what is supposedly its main benefactor and protector. Quite how the world's sole military superpower will put up with the idea of allowing the zionists to possess weapons of mass destruction that could pose a threat to america will be interesting to observe. Quite how the zionists will react if the americans object to the zionists having weapons that could reach america will also be interesting to observe. This will be a critical moment in zionist american relationships. The critical question that americans need to face now whilst they are in the process of boosting zionist supremacy in the middle east, donating vast quantities of money to the zionist state, and providing it with the most sophisticated military weapons, is whether it would be wise for them to allow the zionist state to develop inter-continental ballistic missiles that could reach america.
Politically, the zionist state has always been a bit of a tart. Throughout most of the 1960s, it had a secret liaison with the french government which helped zionists to build the nuclear power station that still provides the zionist state with a constant supply of weapons grade nuclear material, "In the 1950s and into the early 1960s, France and Israel had close relations in many areas. France was Israel's principal arms supplier, and as instability spread through French colonies in North Africa, Israel provided valuable intelligence obtained from contacts with sephardic Jews in those countries." This relationship came to an end in the early 1960s and the zionist state started drawing closer and closer to the american government. However, the zionists' main relationship during the late 1960s and 1970s was with south africa which enabled them to test nuclear weapons and provided the zionists with more nuclear fuel. It was only with the fall of south africa's apartheid government that the zionists were forced to rely more and more upon america which became an increasingly important ally. But the zionists have not been content to rely solely upon the americans. They have also been developing a close relationship with the indian government, "Current military contacts between Israel and India, another nuclear power, bring up questions of nuclear cooperation. Pakistani sources have already voiced concerns over a possible joint Israeli-Indian attack on Pakistan's nuclear facilities." The indian government has also benefitted considerably from this relationship not merely in developing nuclear weapons but in suppressing moslems in kashmir, "Images of an Israeli pilot and an Indian-born civilian engineer drifting weightlessly alongside the other crewmembers from the U.S. military (in the space shuttle colombia) were interpreted as a threat across much of South Asia and the Middle East. In Kashmir, torn by a Muslim insurgency against Indian rule since 1947, the three partner countries India, Israel and the U.S. are referred to as "The Nexus." The connection goes back to Israeli instructors who have been training Indian troops to suppress the Muslim majority population in Kashmir using the brutal methods tested in the West Bank and Gaza Strip." One day the americans will find they have helped the zionists to attain a position where their country is in reach of zionists' weapons of mass destruction. The americans may well regret their licentiousness about the fifth columnists within their midst.
More Examples of Zionist Extremism.
Nathan Lewin.
"In June 2002, Nathan Lewin, "a prominent Washington attorney and Jewish communal leader" called "for the execution of family members of suicide bombers." This call came in an article Lewin wrote for a Jewish journal of ethics (!), Sh'ma. He wrote that the way for Israel to solve its "suicide bomber" problem is to start murdering everyone in the bomber's immediate family, whether they knew anything about their kin's bombing plans or not. This article shocks the moral reader for many reasons. Lewin is not an obscure kook. He is a prominent Jewish American religious figure. And his championing of the killing of innocent people as institutionalized policy is based upon his learned interpretation of Jewish religious law, particularly with regard to the Israelites' Biblical nemesis, the Amelekites. He finds justification for his proposed policy of collective murder in Jewish religious lore." Alan Dershowitz.
"Alan Dershowitz, famous Harvard "civil rights" and Judeo-centric activist, has publicly called for the institutionalization of torture as an option in law enforcement. This, long a taboo in America and other "civilized" countries, is another moral gift from the Jewish lobby and Israel: torture has been a tool for decades in the Jewish state against Palestinian prisoners, condemned by human rights organizations like Amnesty International." Kach & the Guardians of the Cedar.
"And violent groups? They apparently don't have a problem with them as long as they support their favorite country. Jacobs' NUCI has posted materials on its web site by an official of Kach, the violent Israeli militant group outlawed by the United States as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. And FDD Senior Advisor Walid Phares has had a long and close relationship with the Guardians of the Cedar, a pro-Israel Lebanese militia. The group, which in 1976 led the massacre of at least 3,000 Palestinian men, women, and children at the Tel al-Za'atar refugee camp near Beirut (and continues to call the massacre a "cleansing"), is labeled "an extremist Christian group" by the US State Department. The Congressional Research Service labels them an "extremist Maronite militia and terrorist organization.""
|
||
TERRA FIRM - Issue 1 - - Issue 2 - - Issue 3 - - Issue 4 - - Issue 5 - - Issue 6 - - Issue 7 - - Issue 8 - - Issue 9 - - Issue 10 |
Issue 11 - - Issue 12 - - Issue 13 - - Issue 14 - - Issue 15 - - Issue 16 - - Issue 17 - - Issue 18 - - Issue 19 - - Issue 20 |
Issue 21 - - Issue 22 - - Issue 23 - - Issue 24 - - Issue 25 - - Issue 26 - - Issue 27 - - Issue 28 - - Issue 29 - - Issue 30 |
MUNDI CLUB HOME AND INTRO PAGES - Mundi Home - - Mundi Intro |
JOURNALS - Terra / Terra Firm / Mappa Mundi / Mundimentalist / Doom Doom Doom & Doom / Special Pubs / Carbonomics |
TOPICS - Zionism / Earth / Who's Who / FAQs / Planetary News / Bse Epidemic |
ABOUT THE MUNDI CLUB - Phil & Pol / List of Pubs / Index of Website / Terminology / Contact Us |
All publications are copyrighted mundi
club © You are welcome to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy. |
We welcome additional
information, comments, or criticisms. Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/ |
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/ |