The stunning arrogance of such a proposition becomes clear when it is appreciated that consumer bipeds have no appreciation of their indebtedness to Wildlife or ecological habitats for their life support system on Earth. Consumer livestock are so addicted to their consumer lifestyle they are not merely ignorant of their planetary indebtedness but disinterested in learning about the full extent of their debts. Even if their indebtedness was made apparent to them they would implacably oppose any protection for the Earth’s life support system; at the very least, they know nothing and care nothing about repaying their country's Carbon debts. Ooman arrogance is such that they have come to believe they are masters of the Earth and thus entitled to do anything that pops into their minds. Such a grandiose illusion, probably far worse than any illusion suffered by absolute monarchs or infallible popes, means they have come to believe the Earth is indebted to oomans. Oomans expect Wildlife and the Earth to pay them tribute whilst refusing to take care of the Earth. Anthropocentrism, or oomano-centrism, is the fantasy that the Earth revolves around oomans or, to be more precise, oomans’ desire for profit. In reality, oomans are not so much masters of the Earth as squatters, gate crashers, high tech hobos, geophysiological spongers, Carbon debtors, Carbon scroungers, etc.. Unless these grossly indulgent, demented, Earth-wreckers pay their way on Earth there is going to be only one outcome.

Not surprisingly the so-called green movement also abides by this oomanist inversion of the basic rules of life on a finite planet. Over the last decade or so an increasing number of jet setting conservationists in international Wildlife conservation agencies have been calling for the transformation of national conservation/Wilderness areas into game reserves. They want hunting to provide a source of income for people who allegedly live in or around these areas. The conservation movement’s views about the conservation of the world’s rarest and most endangered species has shifted dramatically from protectionism i.e. opposition to hunting, towards a thatcherite ‘pay your way to survive’ free market ethic. Even more surprisingly is that this attitude has been adopted by green radicals promoting a localist agenda but their slogan, 'local people living in harmony with Wildlife', is simply a rationalization of bipeds' invasion of conservation areas and their exploitation of Wildlife. These green thatcherites, and their radical anarcho thatcherite counterparts, are saying that the only chance that the world’s most endangered species have of long term survival is by turning themselves into game Animals, providing sport for the world’s richest thugs who are all too willing to pay handsomely for the opportunity to slaughter trophy Animals. Animal terrorists, including those in the green movement, expect all Animals, like all oomans, to find a job and pay their way or else be replaced by alternatives that will make a profit - despite the fact that global capitalism is incompatible with a sustainable planet. One of the main reasons for the colossal explosion in the sale of ‘bush meat’ is because conservationists, who once protected Wildlife, encourage local people to treat Wild Animals as cash machines.

The fact that Animals created the Earth’s habitability, and even created oomans, are now being expected to make a profit for the financial benefit of Earth-wreckers shows oomans’ power to sustain their oomano-imperialist delusions in the face of the geophysiological facts of life. Oomans believe they can do what they want on Earth and that, from now on, Wildlife, ecological habitats, and even the Earth itself, are going to have to adapt to ooman interests - in particular, ziono-american interests. Animal terrorists promote an ideology which not merely denies that the highly profitable mass slaughter of Wildlife is wrecking the Earth’s life support system, but pretends that such profiteering is good for the environment. Hence Animal terrorists like philip schleswig-holstein-sonderburg-glucksburg[1] who publically criticized the labour government’s ban on handguns and is an outspoken defender of hunting with Dogs and guns, has argued that, “There is therefore no conflict of interest between shooting and conservation.””[2] The fact that such views are supported by so many in the green movement shows what an appalling mess it is now in.

To livestock bipeds it seems just like common sense that Wildlife species, and ecological habitats, have to pay their way to survive. They rarely perceive the implication of this argument - that the Earth itself has got to pay its way if it wants survive. At this point the preposterousness of consumers' delusions comes to the fore. It has to be asked - what are oomans going to do if the Earth refuses to co-operate and pay its way? Are oomans going to kill the planet? If so, where exactly are these scumbags going to live? This is the denialist madness of demented right wing Earth-wreckers and their leftie and greenie allies. It isn't Wildlife, Wildlife habitats, nor the Earth, who have got to pay their way. It is oomans or, more precisely, consumer bipeds. If oomans don't pay their ecological debts they are going to go bust. It’s about time oomans abandoned their oomano-imperialist delusions and asked ‘What is the Earth telling us?’

What is interesting in each of these cases is that, theoretically, each group of Animal terrorists has a direct, concrete, vested interest in the survival of the Animals/land they exploit. And yet, all around the Earth, these terrorists are the very people hunting Wildlife to extinction and pushing more and more land into deserts. Fish are being decimated in all the Earth’s oceans. Whales are still on the verge of extinction. Most of the world’s charismatic Wildlife are on the edge of oblivion. The people who supposedly have a vested interest in the preservation of what they vulgarly call their ‘resources’ are the very people driving these ‘resources’ into extinction. This applies not merely to companies running vast games reserves but to local people running community game resources. Neither seem able to resist the temptation to continually exploit their property for greater profits. Garret hardin once described ecological damage as the rape of the global commons but these days such common sense has been overshadowed by the complete lunacy of free market propaganda which envisages the Earth as a large scale resource centre that all oomans can exploit endlessly for maximum profit. The belief that Wildlife, Plants, and the Earth itself, have to be subjected to the laws of the free market, and intense competition between private profiteers, in order to secure their future, is indicative of a oomans' total, raving, ecocidal loonacy. And this is about as objective a description of what these scumbags are doing as it is possible to provide.