Not content with "denouncing" peta's campaign, the adl jumps away from its illusory moral high ground and tries to smear peta by pointing out peta's links with what it bizarrely calls Animal rights terrorists, "It should also be noted that PETA's relationship with extremist animal rights groups has received increased publicity. In 1995, PETA gave $45,200 to the support committee for Rod Coronado, a convicted arsonist and Animal Liberation Front member, who firebombed a medical research facility at Michigan State University. In April 2001 PETA gave a direct donation of $1,500 to the Earth Liberation Front, the most active and controversial militant environmentalist group in the U.S." To the adl, the firebombing of an Animal torture facility is wicked and evil but it is perfectly acceptable to support the zionist state in palestine's use of F16 fighter planes to destroy the homes of innocent palestinian civilians. When was the last time the adl opposed ariel sharon's crypto-nazi government from slaughtering innocent palestinian civilians? "Leading pro-Israeli organizations in the United States have pointedly refused to condemn Ariel Sharon's inclusion in his new government of the National Union alliance parties whose members ran for election on a platform openly advocating the "transfer" or ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. The National Union is made up of three parties, Moledet, Tekuma and Israel Beitenu and won seven seats in the recent Israeli election. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which boasts of "90 years fighting anti-Semitism, bigotry and extremism," also remained publicly silent. The very high tolerance for racist and potentially genocidal ideas that Foxman evinces when they come from Israelis is not evident in other, lesser cases. For example, when the far-right Freedom Party made gains in Austria's elections in 2000 on an anti-immigrant platform, Foxman issued a statement saying, "It is astonishing that a significant portion of the [Austrian] population is ready to embrace a party and leadership that espouse xenophobic and nativist positions and statements." (ADL press release, 1 February 2000)." In the eyes of the adl the people in the Animal liberationist movement bear an uncanny resemblance to yasser arafat and the palestinian people.

For the last couple of decades it has been nigh on impossible to criticize the racism of the jews-only state in palestine without being denounced as an anti-semite. Noam chomsky, Professor of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has described the adl as "...one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the U.S...Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who dares to criticize the Holy State ('Israel')."

A second reason for the adl's condemnation of peta's campaign is that most adl members support the slaughter of Animals. In other words, the very people who object so much to the use of gas ovens to exterminate jews during the second world war are daily shovelling corpses into their domestic gas ovens. If this doesn't indicate the blinkered nature of the jewish holocaust ideology then nothing will. The members of the jewish holocaust establishment are fully paid up members of the Animal holocaust brigade so they not only do not want to debate the meaning of the term holocaust, they don't even want to debate the idea of Animal rights. As all good religious jews know, Animals were put on Earth to be slaughtered and consumed by oomans. Indeed, the jewish god has sanctioned the Animal holocaust - although what his views are about the slaughter of jews is not known.

Thirdly, the adl doesn't want to discuss the relationship between the people who kill Animals and those who kill oomans because once again it would put them and the jews in the spotlight alongside the nazis. When it comes to the exploitation and slaughter of Animals, the adl and the jewish people are completely indistinguishable from their nazi chums. Jews and nazis are united in their exploitation of Animals.

The members of the adl do not want to face the fact that their slaughter of Animals means that they too, like all other carnivores, are members of the oomano-imperialist master race. In this they are no different from their nazi colleagues. This master race is converting the planet's vast range of habitats into monocultural pastureland (now covering a third of the Earth's land surface) and, in the process, replacing the Earth's vast variety of Wildlife with tens of millions of domesticated Animals which are periodically culled. The adl also doesn't want to face up to the geophysiological facts of life that the Animal exploitation industry is the prime cause of the destabilization of the Earth's climate which, eventually, could trigger off a global burning disaster that would not merely undermine oomans' life support system but destroy all life on Earth. It is this chain of events which proves conclusively that the Animal holocaust is far more important than the petty european slaughter which took place during the second world war. The Biodiversity holocaust is far more significant politically and morally than the slaughter of oomans during the second world war for the obvious reason that if oomans, including jews, destroy the Earth's Wildlife then they destroy the Earth's life support system for oomans. No Wildlife, no life. There is only one holocaust and that is oomans' holocaust against Animals.

In addition, chad powers has pointed out that "the Anti-Defamation League .. was caught spying on all sorts of political organizations across the political spectrum, paid off some lawsuits, and in more recent years lost a $10.5 million lawsuit against it by a Denver film producer, William Quigley, who was smeared by ADL as -- what else? -- an "anti-Semite." Both Jewish "anti-hate" monoliths (the adl and the wiesenthal center - see below) are, meanwhile, emphatic defenders of racist, "hating," dual-moral-standard Israel."

Just to emphasis how morally bankrupt the jewish holocaust industry has become, it ought to be pointed out that jewish holocaust groups have been fighting only for reparations for their own people - not for any of the other social groups which suffered under the nazis. The smell of reparations' money in the nostrils of the jewish holocaust industry has become so overwhelming that they're even insisting on compensation from arab countries for loss of jewish property during zionist inspired wars, "An urgent and comprehensive operation is required in order to locate, collect, compile and document the maximum data on the private and communal Jewish property left behind in Arab countries. The extensive public property that was abandoned and which belonged to the Jewish communities of ten Arab countries, some of them ancient, rich and flourishing communities, includes synagogues, religious schools, schools, Yeshivot, orphanages, hospitals, cemeteries, communal real estate, hostels for the poor ("Hekdesh"), "genizoth", archives, valuable Judaica articles, manuscripts and other priceless spiritual and cultural assets."

Even more lamentable is that whilst the holocaust industry is demanding reparations for the loss of property suffered by jews during the second world war they are refusing to compensate the palestinians whose homes have been demolished, and their land stolen, by the crypto nazi zionist state. In other words, zionists are demanding reparations from european governments which they then deny to the people they are dispossessing.

Dougherty goes on to point out in his/her article that the washington post got involved in the argument, "The Washington Post this week asked Ms. Newkirk if she had "considered asking Arafat to persuade those who listen to him to stop blowing up people as well'' as animals. Her response should be required reading for all would-be members of PETA: "It's not my business to inject myself into human wars,'' Newkirk told the Post. How does one respond to such moral ambiguity?"

There is no moral ambiguity in dougherty's mind as he chants, "In January 2003 -the month in which the donkey died -21 Israelis and eight foreign nationals were killed by terrorists in Israel, and 127 others were injured." Dougherty believes the life of a Donkey is irrelevant in comparison to that of zionists. Dougherty's zionist rewriting of history needs to be disputed in order to tell it like it is. Palestinian freedom fighters killed 21 zionist colonialists illegally occupying land stolen from palestinian people.

Whether jewish world review's attack on peta was part of a zionist campaign to undermine Animal rights in general or just peta's holocaust on a plate campaign is not known but it illustrates the uphill struggle to get oomano-imperialists, of all races, to recognize their participation in the holocaust industry. What is obvious is that the closer oomans are to this evil the less they can see it.

In terms of ooman fatalities, the nazis probably killed as many russians as they killed jews. At the very least, the nazis killed more non-jews than jews. So why the continual emphasis only on jewish deaths? Stalin killed far more people than hitler so why is it that only jewish deaths are discussed? Nobody these days talks about stalin's holocaust or the holocaust inflicted on the russian people - primarily because zionists have monopolized the term holocaust to refer only to the deaths of jews. If zionist propaganda continues to be successful in defining the term holocaust, post world war two generations are going to think the only people killed during the second world war were jews. This is jewish revisionism at its worst. Thankfully, 'consistency in compassion' mention that the nazis also killed gypsies.

'Consistency in compassion' argue that, "The sheer magnitude of the atrocity is perhaps the most sickening part." This is questionable. Pogroms are always sickeningly barbaric. People lapse into a frenzy of bloodlust and completely lose control of themselves and all civilized values. But the killing frenzy usually subsides. On the other hand, the bureaucratic, and industrialized, form of slaughter introduced by the nazis was carried out peacefully and calmly as part of normal, everyday, life. In this mode it could have continued not merely for a couple of years but decades and is surely indicative of a more frightening sort of evil. This form of evil seems to have fewer constraints than pogroms precisely because it incorporates itself as part of normal civilized life - exactly like the Animal exploitation industry in modern consumer societies.

The second danger is that Animal holocaust campaigns tend to focus on the numbers of Animal deaths and the industrialized civilized methods used to kill Animals rather than on the domestication process - in which the Earth's multiplicity of natural habitats are being replaced by a monocultural habitat that is one of the prime causes of the destabilization of the climate.

The main argument that needs to be put forward is that there is only one holocaust and that is the holocaust being perpetrated by oomans against Wildlife and slave Animals. Animal rightists should not use the term holocaust to refer to the slaughter of oomans because in doing so they will reinforce zionist propaganda which has monopolized the term to refer to the slaughter of jews. Oomans slaughter other oomans. They do not carry out a holocaust against other oomans - only Animals. Oomans' holocaust against Animals is a much more serious phenomenon than the petty slaughter of one lot of oomans by another lot.