The Rise and Decline of Russia’s Zionist Oligarchs.

First published september 5th 2004.
Updated february 25th 2004.

List of Contents


The Russian Privatization Disaster.
After the collapse of the soviet empire between 1989-1991 the russian state embarked on the privatization of its state owned industries. A small group of private businessmen eventually took control of russia’s major industries. In 1996 it was estimated that they controlled 50% of the russian economy, "Fridman was one of the Big Seven, the original group of oligarchs who bankrolled the 1996 reelection of President Boris Yeltsin and who claimed to then control 50 percent of Russia's assets." (‘Mikhail Fridman: Oil Tycoon’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/fridman.html October 2003).

The russian people, resentful of the loss of their ideological ownership of state industries, became increasingly incensed that such a small number of people were making vast profits from privatization. They referred disparagingly to this group as ‘the oligarchs’. Although, "Six out of the seven (oligarchs) are Jews." (Uri Avnery ‘The Virgin of Democracy Became a Whore in US, Russia, Israel’ CounterPunch http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery08032004.html August 3rd 2004), the russian people never referred to them as the zionist oligarchs. Or at least, reporters in the western media reporting on events in russia, under censure from the global zionist conspiracy for world domination, never indicated that russians referred to the oligarchs in this way. "Since the end of the Gorbachev era, the Russian oligarchs, nearly all Jewish by ethnicity (with the noticeable exception of Vladimir Potanin), have controlled nearly all key sectors of the Russian economy. This, of course, includes Russia’s major ace-in-the-hole, oil and gas. The giant Yukos conglomerate is presently one of the largest oil companies in the world, valued at about $40 billion. Yukos is the result of a "loans for shares" deal brokered through the semi-coherent Boris Yeltsin in 1995. Here, the liberal Russian government swapped loyalty from the oligarchs in exchange for privatization at prices far below that of the market. This $40 billion giant was bought for about $300 million, thus looting the entire Russian economy for the benefit of a handful of Israeli citizens living in Russia." (M. Raphael Johnson ‘Countdown to Armageddon? Are the Israelis willing to start World War III?’ American Free Press http://www.americanfreepress.net/11_07_03/Countdown_to_Armageddon
/countdown_to_armageddon.html April 12 2004); "In Russia today, just a handful of oligarchs control 85 percent of the value of the country's leading private companies. And with their multibillion-dollar fortunes, they are joining the top ranks of the world's wealthiest people." (Kelly Whalen Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/billionaires.html October 28 2003).

In 2003, one commentator estimated that their control over the russian economy had increased to 85%. "In Russia today, just a handful of oligarchs control 85 percent of the value of the country's leading private companies. And with their multibillion-dollar fortunes, they are joining the top ranks of the world's wealthiest people." (Kelly Whalen Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/billionaires.html October 28 2003).

The term ‘oligarchs’ is overly complimentary to what should be more accurately described as zionist robber barons, "Unlike the 19th-century American robber barons who built their monopolies from the wilderness, Russia's oligarchs amassed their control and wealth from existing enterprises. With few exceptions, Russia's oligarchs built nothing new. The men had varying backgrounds. Some were factory managers who during Russia's transition forced their employees to sell them their shares in the once-state-owned enterprises; others were senior government officials while yet others were underground businessmen on the margins of society. But all shared a common thirst for money and power, the latter of which included establishing - or maintaining - connections to the political elite in Russia, a country where the rule of law is still sometimes trumped by the rule of in-laws." (Kelly Whalen Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/billionaires.html October 28 2003).

Justin raimondo regards them in a similar way, "But the truth about the jailed oligarch's empire (mikhail khodorkovsky) is that every expansion of its boundaries was achieved by political pull rather than entrepreneurial acumen. His initial business ventures under Gorbachev's perestroika were made possible on account of his position as a high official in the Young Communist League. His Menatep Bank, the first post-Soviet commercial bank in Russia, used government funds on deposit - including from the tax collection agency and the state-owned arms export business - as capital to acquire such properties as Yukos, the state-owned oil company. Khodorkovsky's bid to acquire it was not the highest, but he got it anyway ­ at the bargain basement price of $350 million. The other oligarchs are even worse." "Using methods that would be illegal in most Western countries, Russia's oligarchs ripped off their own shareholders and stiffed foreign investors to the tune of billions of dollars. As the Los Angeles Times reported: "Khodorkovsky excluded minority shareholders by moving shareholder meetings at the last minute to remote locations. He ordered the issuance of shares to dilute the power of other stockholders. After the financial collapse of 1998, he shuffled his remaining assets through subsidiaries to hide them from creditors. Once, at a time regulators were asking tough questions about operations by his bank, Menatep, a truck carrying Menatep documents happened to fall into the Moscow River." (Justin Raimondo ‘Now They're After Putin: The hypocrites of the "democratic" West set their sights on Russia’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j121003.html December 10, 2003).

Some of the zionist oligarchs acquired new industries through extortion "…it remains to be seen how far Putin will go to defend foreign investors. But there are clues. A year ago, for example, one of the country’s most powerful oligarchs, Oleg Deripaska, the owner of Russian Aluminum, went after the holdings of Ilim Pulp of St. Petersburg, the country’s largest forestry enterprise. There were threats against its Western managers, and armed battles between the company’s security guards and Deripaska thugs, who sought to take control of the company by sheer force. When Putin got wind of it, he called the tycoon. Desist, he said, or ‘I will break you.’ The Russian verb he used, razorvu, means to smash, to tear into little pieces. Not long after, the strong-arm tactics ceased. Says Frank Graves, the company’s Canadian chief operating officer: ‘we love Putin.’" (Cdeliso ‘The Oligarchs’ Menace’ balkanalysis.com http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=161 October 19 2003).

The consequence of the oligarchs’ ransacking of russian resources is that, "Russia now has 17 billionaires, more than any country except for the United States, Germany and Japan." (Sabrina Tavernise Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/thestory.html October 28 2003). "In 2000, there were no billionaires in Russia, whereas today there are 17." (‘Richard Perle to the rescue in Russia’ Balkan Analysis http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=232 January 13 2004).

The Phases of Zionists’ Rise to Power.
According to david hoffman, the zionists’ rise to power can be seen in three stages. No matter how much zionist control over russia’s economic and political systems might seem to resemble something out of the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zionism’ hoffman’s analysis shows that there was no original conspiracy that started the take-over. It evolved by accident and became conspiratorial only in 1994. "The evolution of Russia's oligarchs over the past ten years can be broken down into three distinct phases. The first of these phases coincides with the early days of Gorbachev's reform initiatives, when state control of the economy began to loosen and opportunities for turning an easy profit first appeared. In the second phase of the oligarchs' development, banking became the endeavor of choice. In September of 1994, the oligarchs embarked on the third phase of their development with the formation of a private club designed to facilitate the transformation of their wealth into political power. The paramount issue was how to limit competition among themselves so that each could focus on accumulating as much wealth as possible. The fruits of this cooperation came in schemes like the loans for shares program, export control manipulation and culminated in the Davos pact that helped to re-elect Yeltsin. It was during this period that the oligarchs began searching for political sponsorship and influence within the Kremlin. The oligarchs also began to diversify their holdings, expanding their holdings to include ownership of natural resource companies and media outlets." (David Hoffman ‘Oligarchic Capitalism in Russia: The Past, Present and Future’ Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’ http://www.ceip.org/files/events/events.asp?EventID=463 February 27, 2002).

The Big Seven Zionist Oligarchs.
In the mid 1990s, the zionist oligarchs had acquired half of the russian economy and, to help them protect and enhance their interests, they worked together to re-elect boris yeltsin for a second term in office as russia’s president. At this point in time, it has been alleged that there were seven russian oligarchs, six of them zionist, conspiring together to re-elect yeltsin. The conspiracy to re-elect yeltsin defines the ‘big seven’, "the Big Seven, the original group of oligarchs who bankrolled the 1996 reelection of President Boris Yeltsin and who claimed to then control 50 percent of Russia's assets." (‘Mikhail Fridman: Oil Tycoon’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/fridman.html October 2003). Unfortunately, it is a little difficult working out who belongs in this classification. The following were members of russia’s ‘big seven’ zionist oligarchs.

Vagit Alekperov.
"By 1991, Alekperov had established himself as an industry expert, winning an appointment as first deputy minister of fuel and energy, then as acting minister. He used his newly attained power to lobby for the consolidation of Russia's three oil producers into one company - then assumed presidency of the new company. His nicknames, "the General," "Alek the First" and "the Don," are indicative of his indisputable authority at LUKoil, whose name came from the first letters of the three companies that consolidated - Langepas, Urai and Kogalym. Today LUKoil is among the world's most powerful oil companies, with reserves second only to Exxon. Like many other oligarchs, Alekperov has moved into banking and media." (‘Vagit Alekperov: Oil Magnate’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/alekperov.html October 2003); "Another "former" Commie who turned his government career into a fortune: a first deputy minister of energy under the old regime, Comrade Alekperov snapped up Lukoil, the largest oil company in Russia, under the "shares for loans" ersatz-privatization scheme cooked up by "the Family" as a pay-off for their support to the Yeltsin regime. (Justin Raimondo ‘Now They're After Putin: The hypocrites of the "democratic" West set their sights on Russia’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j121003.html December 10, 2003); "In 2003, LUKoil negotiated new exploration contracts in western Iran, Egypt's Gulf of Suez, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. In 2002, LUKoil signed a six-year contract with Ecopetrol (Empresa Colombiana de Petroleos), the Colombian state oil company, to explore and produce in the Llanos petroleum basin. LUKoil also owns its own refineries and filling stations, including 1,300 in the United States, which it acquired after its purchase of Getty Oil in 2000. LUKoil was the first Russian company to acquire a publicly traded U.S. corporation." (‘Vagit Alekperov: Oil Magnate’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/alekperov.html October 2003).

Boris Berezovsky.
"In 1996, Berezovsky teamed up with other powerful Russian bankers to form the Big Seven, a group of oligarchs that underwrote Yeltsin's reelection campaign. Berezovsky viewed himself as a king-maker, and he was a major force in ousting some senior officials and electing others." (‘Boris Berezovksy: Russia’s Fallen Oligarch’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/berezovsky.html October 2003); "Paul Klebnikov tells the incredible story of Boris Berezovsky, a one-time Russian car dealer who assembled a huge - and illicit - fortune after the collapse of Communism. "This individual had risen out of nowhere to become the richest businessman in Russia and one of the most powerful individuals in the country," writes Klebnikov, a respected reporter for Forbes." (John J. Miller ‘Editorial Reviews’ Amazon.com). Klebnikov was shot dead shortly after the publication of his book about the rise of the hoodlum oligarchs. In the mid-1990s Berezovsky became deputy head of the Russian security council. "At the peak of his power Berezovsky owned a television network, Russia's biggest car company and its national airline." (Sabrina Tavernise Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/thestory.html October 28 2003); "Berezovksy also was instrumental in Putin's 2000 election victory before the two men's falling-out, which began over Berezovsky's public criticism of Putin for his slow response to the deadly sinking of the Russian nuclear submarine Kursk. (‘Boris Berezovksy: Russia’s Fallen Oligarch’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/berezovsky.html October 2003).

Oleg Deripaska.
"Fellow oligarch Roman Abramovich became Deripaska's partner; in early 2000, the two created a joint venture called Russian Aluminum (RusAl). Today, RusAl has $4 billion in annual sales and is the world's second-largest aluminum producer. Deripaska owns 75 percent of the company. His other businesses include power stations, Russia's largest car and commercial vehicle manufacturer, and the country's largest insurance company. Deripaska is married to Polina Yumashev, the daughter of former President Boris Yeltsin's chief of staff. Deripaska's father-in-law in turn married Yeltsin's daughter, which makes Deripaska a grandson of Yeltsin by marriage." (‘Oleg Deripaska: Aluminium King’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/deripaska.html October 2003).

Mikhail Fridman.
"Fridman's partner, Peter Aven, was Russia's minister of foreign economic affairs. Fridman was one of the Big Seven, the original group of oligarchs who bankrolled the 1996 reelection of President Boris Yeltsin and who claimed to then control 50 percent of Russia's assets." (‘Mikhail Fridman: Oil Tycoon’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/fridman.html October 2003); "Galmond, it transpires, is the owner of Ipoc, which hit the headlines 10 days ago after scoring a significant victory in its long-running legal battle with Alfa Group, the oil and banking conglomerate run by controversial Russian oligarch Mikhail Fridman. On the other side, timely reminders have surfaced of an old and embarrassing row between Fridman and BP over the ownership of Russian oil firm Sidanco, although relations were patched up and Fridman is now a major strategic partner of the British oil giant." (Conal Walsh ‘The acceptable face of Russian capitalism?. The Observer http://www.guardian.co.uk/russia/article/0,2763,1297356,00.html September 5, 2004).

Vladimir Gusinsky.
"He (Gusinsky) started small, as a provincial theatre director in the early 80s, then as an illegal commercial taxi driver in Moscow before starting a small metal-working firm. In the early 90s, he moved into banking and property. He used his fortune to found NTV, Russia's biggest private television channel, and the hard-hitting daily newspaper, Segodnya, in 1993. He also launched a glossy weekly news magazine, Itogi, in partnership with Newsweek." (Ian Traynor ‘Russia turns against irreverent oligarch’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,332213,00.html June 15, 2000); "The 50-year-old businessman, who once controlled Russia's biggest independent television station, NTV ..." (Helena Smith ‘Russian tycoon goes free’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1063066,00.html October 15, 2003); "In 1993, Gusinsky launched his first independent newspaper, Sevodnya, which put him on his way to becoming "Russia's Rupert Murdoch." Using connections from his earlier days, Gusinsky called upon Deputy Mayor of Moscow Yuri Luzhkov for help in gaining control of the television station Channel 4. With Russia's war in Chechnya just beginning, Gusinsky's station was critical of President Boris Yeltsin and his policies. In 1996, however, when a Communist Party presidential candidate presented a real threat to Yeltsin's reelection, the rising media magnate suspended all criticism. After Yeltsin won the reelection, Gusinsky was awarded the country's first private television network, NTV, and his media conglomerate, Media-MOST, expanded to include a satellite communications network, a series of radio stations and magazines, such as Itogi, jointly published with Newsweek." (‘Vladimir Gusinksy: Media Magnate’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/gusinsky.html October 2003).

Mikhail Khodorkovsky.
Khodorkovsky bought one of the world's leading fertilizer companies, "Russian prosecutors say that in 1994 Mr. Khodorkovsky fraudulently obtained Apatit, a government-owned company that was one of the world's leading producers of fertilizer. Only four bidders competed for a 20 percent stake in the company and all were fronts for Mr. Khodorkovsky, prosecutors say. The highest bidder made a $1 billion offer but then dropped out. The sale went to the lowest bidder, say prosecutors, with an offer of only $283 million in cash and investments. (Timothy L O'Brien and Erin E. Aryedlund ‘Putin vs. the Jailed Tycoon: Defining Russia's New Rules’ New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/international/europe/02YUKO.html
?ex=1091505600&en=ccaed12aad46976e&ei=5070&ei=1&en=dffd424a51774
abe&ex=1074049675&pagewanted=print&position= January 2, 2004).

Khodorkovsky also acquired Yukos, a major russian oil company, "Khodorkovsky and his partners bought Yukos from the state in 1995 for about $370 million in one of the highly controversial privatization auctions of the 1990s. That was widely seen as a severely undervalued price; at the height of Yukos fortunes last spring it was valued at $45 billion." (Alex Nicholson ‘Oil Companies Look to Fill Yukos' Void’ Associated Press Jul 25, 2004). "Mr. Khodorkovsky built his oil fortune on Kremlin connections, smarts and cold-blooded determination, beginning with his purchase of Yukos from the state in a controversial auction in 1995 ..." (Timothy L O'Brien and Erin E. Aryedlund ‘Putin vs. the Jailed Tycoon: Defining Russia's New Rules’ New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/international/europe/02YUKO.html
?ex=1091505600&en=ccaed12aad46976e&ei=5070&ei=1&en=dffd424a51774
abe&ex=1074049675&pagewanted=print&position= January 2, 2004). He did everything he could to ensure he continued to control yukos and extract as much profit from it as possible, "In 1999, he moved the location of a Yukos shareholders meeting 160 miles from Moscow without advance notice to minority stockholders, keeping them from voting against the sale of Yukos's assets to an offshore company. That same year, he prepared a large issue of new shares that diluted the stake of American investor Kenneth Dart, who claimed Khodorkovsky defrauded him of millions of dollars." (‘Mikhail Khodorkovsky: Billionaire Industrialist’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/khodorkovsky.html October 2003).

Khodorkovsky owned a substantial stake of russia’s economy, "Through his holding company, Rosprom, Khodorkovsky snatched up chemical, construction, textile, mining and oil enterprises." (‘Mikhail Khodorkovsky: Billionaire Industrialist’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/khodorkovsky.html October 2003).

Nevzlin, Leonid.
"As the Soviet Union collapsed at the end of the 1980s, he (Leonid Nevzlin) moved into banking and within two years joined Yukos Oil as a top executive. Cleverly, he helped re-elect Yeltsin to the presidency in the mid-1990s and was awarded a medal for his efforts. He was not alone in supporting Yeltsin. Many prominent Jewish figures in oil, banking and media spent money to keep Yeltsin in power." (Fred Lingel ‘Israel Offers Sanctuary to Accused Billionaire-Murderer’ American Free Press Aug 16, 2004 http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=63569); "Nevzlin is the second-biggest shareholder in oil giant Yukos, and holds Khodorkovsky's voting rights in the company, according to the Wall Street Journal." (Dafna Maor ‘Hounded Russian oil barons meet in Israel’ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/366788.html 30/11/2003).

"Nevzlin is the second-biggest shareholder in oil giant Yukos, and holds Khodorkovsky's voting rights in the company, according to the Wall Street Journal." (Dafna Maor ‘Hounded Russian oil barons meet in Israel’ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/366788.html 30/11/2003).

The Seven becomes Seventeen.
After the re-election of yeltsin in 1996, new members began to join the big seven russian oligarchs. By the end of 2003 it was estimated there were 17 russian oligarchs - although how many of them are zionist is not known. "Khodorkovsky is one of Russia's "oligarchs," a group of 17 billionaires who acquired sudden wealth in the 1990s after the Soviet Union collapsed and they bought government properties at fire-sale prices. Polls show that most Russians deeply resent the oligarchs. Most of them are young; Khodorkovsky is 40. And many of them, including Khodorkovsky, are Jewish." (William Schneider ‘Putin's Arresting Move’ American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research http://www.aei.org/news/newsID.19403,filter./news_detail.asp October 31, 2003).

Roman Abramovich.
"Abramovich attributes much of his success to the patronage of oil magnate Boris Berezovsky, who introduced him to Yeltsin's inner circle. By 1996, Abramovich joined the board of directors for Sibneft, Berezovsky's most prized oil holding, and was later put in charge of the company's Moscow offices. After Berezovsky fell out of favor with the new Putin regime, Abramovich took over his patron's oil assets and the country's largest television network. In 2000, Abramovich expanded his empire to form the multibillion-dollar company Russian Aluminum while also branching out into politics. First winning a seat in the State Duma (the lower chamber of the Russian parliament), Abramovich then became governor of Chukotka, a position he has held for two years. The desolate Russian province has become a sort of personal project for Abramovich - he has spent tens of millions of dollars of his own money building new homes, supermarkets, hotels and cinemas in Chukotka. Critics say his real motives are control over the region's natural resources and perhaps greater political aspirations. Abramovich's assets are managed offshore through his investment fund Millhouse Capital, located in Britain, which Abramovich seems to slowly be making his home." (Kelly Whalen Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/billionaires.html October 28 2003).

It was reported in 2003 that, "Abramovich is cashing in on billions of dollars of his Russian assets, selling his majority stake of oil company Sibneft; 25 percent of his shares in Russian Aluminum; his 26 percent stake in Russian airline Aeroflot; and reportedly all of his shares in leading sausage producer Omsk Bacon." (Kelly Whalen Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/billionaires.html October 28 2003). "Abramovich is one of the wealthiest persons in the world, with a personal fortune estimated at $5.7 billion. He took over Sibneft together with Boris Berezovsky, in Russia's biggest privatization in the 1990s. Abramovich also owns half of Russia's biggest aluminum producer, and the television network ORT, via a British holding company. He also recently acquired control over the Chelsea soccer team, since redubbed Chelsky by wags. Billionaire Roman Abramovich, Russia's second-richest man and principal owner of oil producer Sibneft ..." (Dafna Maor ‘Hounded Russian oil barons meet in Israel’ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/366788.html 30/11/2003); "The 36-year-old tycoon (Roman Abramovich), who is worth at least £1.8bn, sold his stake in Sibneft to Yukos to consolidate his position as Russia's second richest man. With plenty of cash to play with, Mr Abramovich has branched out into English football by buying Chelsea and throwing money at the club." (Mark Tran ‘Proceed with caution’ Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/economicdispatch/story/0,,1062146,00.html October 13, 2003).

Chernoy, Mikhail.
Chernoy is believed to be residing in the zionist state in palestine.

Lebedev, Platon.
"Platon Lebedev is Mr Khodorkovsky's friend at the Yukos oil corporation." (Notebook ‘Robber barons are in a whole new ball game’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,991058,00.html July 4, 2003). According to peter lavelle, lebedev is a billionaire. (Peter Lavelle ‘Russia's Accessory Political Economy’ http://www.untimely-thoughts.com/index.html?cat=Oct%2024,%202003&type=3&art=194 October 24, 2003).

Viktor Vekselberg and Len Blavatnik.
The observer newspaper refers to other russian oligarchs ­ although it is not known whether they are zionist or not, "And BP is still trying to sound confident about its TNK deal. 'We have an excellent set of agreements,' a spokesman said last week. 'We expect all partners to stick to those agreements.' Those partners, the Russian oligarchs Mikhail Fridman, Viktor Vekselberg and Len Blavatnik, are pushing to be paid early for their 50 per cent stake in TNK. They are due staggered payments totalling $3.75bn in BP shares over the next three years. But the Russians say they have spotted other investment opportunities, and want their money now - in cash." (Conal Walsh ‘Russian oligarchs put screws on BP’ The Observer http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1212276,00.html Sunday May 9, 2004).

Brudno, Mikhail.

Dubov, Vladimir.

Boris yeltsin won his first presidential election in 1991. His health was already bad and continued to worsen over the following years. Increasingly he had to rely on others to carry out his presidential duties. According to paul klebnikov, boris berezovsky was one of yeltin’s main advisers. "Before assuming the editorship of Forbes Russia, he (klebnikov) was best known for his research into the business and connections of the so-called oligarch Boris Berezovsky, whom he accused of corruption and excessive influence over the Kremlin during the presidency of Boris Yeltsin, from 1991 to 1999." (Carolynne Wheeler and Christopher Reed ‘American journalist probing Russian business’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/obituaries/story/0,,1262387,00.html July 16, 2004).

During yeltsin’s first period as president, the zionist oligarchs had used their political influence within the kremlin to acquire many of russia’s most prized economic assets. They needed the weak and ailing yeltsin to remain in office as their puppet or ‘shabbat goy’ so they could continue to protect their interests. In 1996 they worked together to re-elect yeltsin as the russian president - even though he was close to death. "The oligarchs decided to take power through him. They had almost unlimited funds, control of all TV channels and most of the other media. They put all these at the disposal of Yeltsin's reelection campaign, denying his opponents even one minute of TV time and pouring huge sums of money into the effort. (The series omits an interesting detail: they secretly brought over the most outstanding American election experts and copywriters, who applied methods previously unknown in Russia.)" (Uri Avnery ‘The Virgin of Democracy Became a Whore in US, Russia, Israel’ CounterPunch http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery08032004.html August 3rd 2004). According to jonathan steele .. "Yeltsin was shoe-horned into a second presidential term in 1996 with the aid of lies and blatant manipulation on all the national TV channels." (Jonathan Steele ‘Putin sweeps the Chechen war under his red carpet’ The Guardian June 18, 2003); "Mr Gusinsky, it is true, is not a man of the highest principle. During the flawed 1996 presidential election, he used his media empire for blatant pro-Kremlin propaganda." (Leader ‘Silencing Russia's media. Mr Blair should not keep quiet’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,,474297,00.html April 18, 2001).

Yeltsin’s reign didn’t last beyond the day of his re-election, "The (zionist oligarchs’) campaign bore fruit: Yeltsin was indeed reelected. On the very same day he had another heart attack and spent the rest of his term in hospital. In practice, the oligarchs ruled Russia. One of them, Boris Berezovsky, appointed himself Prime Minister." (Uri Avnery ‘The Virgin of Democracy Became a Whore in US, Russia, Israel’ CounterPunch http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery08032004.html August 3rd 2004).

Russia’s 1996 presidential election has become notorious for the zionist oligarchs’ use of their wealth and media power to manipulate the russian electorate into voting for a semi-comatose candidate. In the run up to these elections, there was little public support for yeltsin. But not even an unpopular, half dead, candidate posed any real electoral difficulties for the resurrectory powers of the zionist oligarchs, "Deploying his media resources, he (Guzinsky) helped Boris Yeltsin win a second presidential term - against the odds - in 1996." (Ian Traynor ‘Russia turns against irreverent oligarch’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,332213,00.html June 15, 2000). Public opinion polls gave him only 10% of the popular vote, "after starting the campaign with a public opinion rating of less than 10% ..." (Jonathan Steele ‘Boxing clever’ The Guardian December 23, 1999).

After yeltsin’s re-election, further privatizations were carried out. These turned out to be a disaster for russia since the country received little benefit from the sales, "The (american) administration should have pushed harder to stop Yeltsin's "reformers" from embracing a 1996 privatization scheme known as "loans for shares." This corrupt deal allowed Russia's new business tycoons to acquire the crown jewels of the economy - the mining and natural resource companies - in exchange for cheap loans to the government. Loans for shares was "the reformers' original sin," argues journalist Chrystia Freeland. In the mind of ordinary Russians, it linked capitalism with thievery." (David Ignatius ‘Was the Looting Of Russia Avoidable?’ The Washington Post - September 8 1999).

In the mid 1990s putin was a member of the federal security bureau, the successor to the soviet union's kgb. During his work he came into contact with some of the zionist oligarchs who were impressed with his efficiency and honesty. They regarded him as someone who could help them so they reciprocated by boosting his career. Putin’s rise through the ranks was meteoric and was possible only with the support, or at the very least the approval, of the zionist oligarchs. In september 1999, putin was appointed to the post of prime minister. "In the 1990s, they were friends: Berezovsky remembers the young Putin as the one Petersburg bureaucrat who did what he promised and didn't need to be bribed to do it. Later that decade, Berezovsky stood by Putin as Yevgeny Primakov ­ Boris Yeltsin's penultimate, rather sinister, prime minister ­ seemed set to assume the crown." (Bret Stephens ‘Boris Berezovsky: Putin's Russia 'dangerous for Israel'’ July 5 2004).

Shortly after his appointment, russia was hit by a series of attacks which included the bombing of apartment blocks in moscow. This led boris yeltsin and putin to order russia’s second invasion of chechnya. In may 2000, with the aid of the zionist oligarchs’ vast wealth and media power, and with popular support for the invasion of chechnya, putin won the russian presidential election. Bulent gokay ascribes putin’s rise to power to his exploitation of the war in chechnya, ignoring the influence of the zionist oligarchs, "Putin's own rise to power was closely bound up with similar aggressive campaigns against Chechnia. In August 1999, Yeltsin nominated the largely unknown former security service veteran, Vladimir Putin, as head of the government. Shortly afterwards a series of bomb attacks destroyed blocks of flats in Moscow and other Russian cities, claiming hundreds of victims. Although the perpetrators were never properly identified, there were many indications that the secret service agency FSB was involved. Putin used the bombings as an excuse to once again undertake a full-scale military mobilisation against Chechnia. Appealing to Russian chauvinism and making crude attacks on Chechens he was swept into office as Russia's president on a wave of nationalist hysteria." (Bulent Gokay ‘The Heavy Hand of Putin: Russia and Chechnia After Beslan’ http://www.counterpunch.org/gokay09082004.html September 8, 2004).

Putin owed much of his career advancement in the federal security bureau, his appointment to the post of prime minister, and his election as president of russia, to the zionist oligarchs. "Imagine a party which emerges out of nothing two months before voting day, has no manifesto, publishes no proposals, and avoids debating its opponents. Obviously a non-starter, you would say. Not in a country where the two main television networks are in the hands of the very men who created this phantom party. Known as Unity and with a bear as a symbol, it has almost no existence beyond the television screen. When Yeltsin was re-elected president three years ago, after starting the campaign with a public opinion rating of less than 10%, observers from the EU-financed European Institute for the Media criticised the massively one-sided coverage on state television. This time, monitors not only noted similar bias. They also denounced the overwhelmingly dirty coverage. (Jonathan Steele ‘Boxing clever’ The Guardian December 23, 1999); "On ORT, the biggest channel, Unity got twice as much news time as Fatherland-All Russia, the main centrist block. While the pro-Putin block's mentions were consistently positive, the reporting of Fatherland was loaded with negative comment. In 1966 ORT suppressed the news that Yeltsin had suffered a heart attack four days before the voting, but this time it unashamedly repeated the claim that Fatherland's leader, 70-year-old Yevgeny Primakov, was too old and ill to be credible. ORT also gave disproportionate and largely favourable coverage to the ultra-nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovksy, who usually supports the Kremlin in the Duma. The government feared his party might not get over the 5% barrier needed for seats in parliament. (Jonathan Steele ‘Boxing clever’ The Guardian December 23, 1999).

Having done so much for putin, the zionist oligarchs doubtlessly believed he was a ‘shabbat goy’ who owed them a great many political favours once he’d become the russian president. They may even have believed he was their puppet who would take orders from them. If this was the case, they quickly discovered that he had fooled them. Putin was a russian nationalist who wanted to transform his country into a modern, technologically advanced, industrialized economy and restore some of his country’s pride and glory which had faded so calamitously since the collapse of the soviet empire. He knew all about the zionist oligarchs ­ how they had acquired their economic power, and their enormous political power to decide presidential elections. He had a good idea about the direction they would take the country if they remained in power: at worst, continuing to ransack the country’s resources whilst millions more russians sank into poverty. At best a wealthy economy like america’s but with a political system dominated by zionists and a society wracked by poverty, violence, racism, and corruption. The zionist oligarchs in russia cared nothing about russian people just as zionists in america cared nothing about americans, and zionists in palestine cared nothing about palestinians. If he didn’t act, the russian parliament and presidency would become as beholden to the zionist oligarchs, as the american and brutish political systems are currently beholden to their zionists. Russia would lose control of its own resources and, in effect, become a mere source of raw materials for the zionist dominated american superpower. Putin didn’t need a judicial investigation to find evidence of the zionist oligarchs’ criminal activities and the threat they posed to the stability of the country ­ he’d seen enough to realize they had to be curbed.

Once putin had been elected as president, he began to curb the power of the zionist oligarchs. "Once Putin came to power, however, his inclination to repay his patron's favors waned. In his first state of the nation address in July 2000, Putin said Russia would no longer tolerate "shadowy groups" in its midst. People knew just who he meant." (Bret Stephens ‘Boris Berezovsky: Putin's Russia 'dangerous for Israel'’ July 5 2004).

Berezovsky forced into Exile.
The first of the zionist oligarchs that putin acted against was boris berezovsky. "In 1999, he (Berezovksy) won a seat in the State Duma (the lower chamber of the Russian parliament), but six months later, amid unrelenting pressure from the new regime of President Vladimir Putin, Berezovksy resigned and soon fled Russia. The Russian Prosecutor General's office charged Berezovsky in absentia with complicity to fraud, complicity not to return hard currency from abroad, and money laundering." (‘Russia’s Fallen Oligarch’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/berezovsky.html October 2003); "Within months Berezovsky was forced to divest his stakes in the oil company Sibneft, in Aeroflot, and in ORT TV. The political party he helped found and for which he briefly served as a deputy in the Duma, the Liberal Russia Party, has seen two of its leaders murdered. By November, Berezovsky had gone into self-described political exile." (Bret Stephens ‘Boris Berezovsky: Putin's Russia 'dangerous for Israel'’ July 5 2004). Given berezovsky’s wealth and power and his inside knowledge of the kremlin, it was a major political accomplishment for putin to have been able to dispossess berezovsky and force him into exile. Berezovsky, reflecting on all that he and the other zionist oligarchs had done for putin, must have had reasons to complain about putin’s treachery towards them.

The Arrest of Gusinsky.
Putin’s next target was vladimir gusinsky. After putin’s convincing defeat of berezovsky, it might have been thought that the other members of israel’s oligarchy in russia might have started to act a little more cautiously towards him. Instead, doubtlessly seeing him as a newcomer to russian politics without the necessary expertise and power base, they decided to battle against him to regain their power and protect their ill-gotten gains.

Gusinsky must have thought he was powerful enough to take on putin. He controlled a substantial segment of the russian media. His power was so great he had helped to elect two successive russian presidents. He was also a friend of a former president of the united states. "When the US President Bill Clinton came to Moscow last week for his first summit with Mr Putin, he made a point of going on Mr Gusinsky's radio station for a phone in. The Kremlin was outraged - but Mr Gusinsky has many friends in the west." (Ian Traynor ‘Russia turns against irreverent oligarch’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,332213,00.html June 15, 2000). And what might have made him feel even more invincible were his links to global zionism which, it might be thought, should have been wealthy and powerful enough to protect him. "He is also an Israeli citizen and a powerful figure in the World Jewish Congress, heading its Russian wing." (Ian Traynor ‘Russia turns against irreverent oligarch’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,332213,00.html June 15, 2000).

Gusinsky seemed to believe he was safe enough to publicly ridicule putin and, perhaps, eventually replace him with another candidate more amenable to the interests of the russian zionists. Whereas berekovsky had challenged putin primarily within the walls of the kremlin, gusinsky launched his challenge to putin from his many media outlets … "the 47-year-old media mogul has been a thorn in the flesh of the ruling clan throughout Mr Putin's meteoric rise to power in the past year. Every Sunday night his NTV channel lampoons Mr Putin, Kremlin bigshots, the entire political class with the silicon puppets and absurd escapades of Kukly - Russia's "Spitting Images". It's popular, it's hilarious and it annoys Mr Putin no end. Every night NTV's news punctures the anodyne claims of Russian triumphs in Chechnya and queries the official version of casualty figures. Every week Mr Gusinsky's Itogi magazine and Segodnya newspaper purvey more revelations of sleaze and corruption among the high and mighty. Mr Gusinsky is the sole oligarch to oppose Mr Putin publicly and consistently." (Ian Traynor ‘Russia turns against irreverent oligarch’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,332213,00.html June 15, 2000).

Putin continued to exert administrative pressure against gusinsky, "On his NTV network, Gusinsky broadcast a satiric puppet show, Kukly, that ridiculed the Russian political and business establishment. Putin tried to terminate the program, but Gusinsky persisted. When NTV was critical first of Putin's slow reaction to the sinking of the nuclear submarine Kursk, then of the government's inability to provide heat and electricity for freezing residents in Russia's Far East, Putin stepped up his anti-Gusinsky campaign. Media-MOST's headquarters and offices were raided more than 30 times by everyone from masked tax police to deputies of the prosecutor general. In June 2000, Gusinsky was arrested on charges of embezzlement and spent three days in a Moscow jail. "(‘Vladimir Gusinksy: Media Magnate’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/gusinsky.html October 2003).

Gusinsky must have felt a degree of shock when he found himself in prison, "Mr Gusinsky's detention is a defining moment for the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, only a month after he was inaugurated in the Kremlin. The overcrowding in the prison is such that the inmates take turns to sleep. And yesterday, sharing a cell with a counterfeiter and a suspected embezzler - "decent people", said a justice ministry spokesman - Vladimir Gusinsky became the latest high-profile inmate of Butyrka and, in the words of a Moscow journalist, "the first political prisoner of Putin's Russia". And he is the only one to have ended up in the overcrowded squalor of the jail commissioned by Catherine the Great in 1771." (Ian Traynor ‘Russia turns against irreverent oligarch’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,332213,00.html June 15, 2000).

In april 2001, putin took decisive action against gusinsky’s empire, "First went the TV station. On Monday the newspaper closed and yesterday the best of Russia's independent news magazines lost its staff. Three strikes and Vladimir Gusinsky, the man who created NTV, Segodnya and Itogi, is out." (Leader ‘Silencing Russia's media. Mr Blair should not keep quiet’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,,474297,00.html April 18, 2001); "While Gusinsky was in exile, the state gas monopoly Gazprom seized control of Gusinsky's NTV, valued at $1 billion. A Russian court also ordered the liquidation of Media-MOST and gave the gas giant 25 percent plus one share of all companies once owned by Media-MOST. Gazprom also took control of and closed Gusinsky's first newspaper Sevodnya and fired and locked out the staff of news magazine Igoti. "(‘Vladimir Gusinksy: Media Magnate’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/gusinsky.html October 2003).

Many western commentators condemned putin’s political attacks on gusinsky and the zionist oligarchs as a civil rights issue i.e. an attack on the media and freedom of expression. "Putin has failed to halt the distortions which began after Yeltsin was shoe-horned into a second presidential term in 1996 with the aid of lies and blatant manipulation on all the national TV channels." (Jonathan Steele ‘Putin sweeps the Chechen war under his red carpet’ The Guardian June 18, 2003). The reason for putin’s action was not because he was keen to acquire dictatorial powers to control the russian political system and the media, but because he had to curb the criminality of zionist oligarchs who were threatening to destroy his country.

Khodorkovsky goes on the Offensive.
Despite the fact that putin had forced one zionist oligarch into exile and imprisoned another, some of the other zionist oligarchs were still unwilling to release their grip on power. The next zionist oligarch to take up the challenge of ousting putin was mikhail khodorkovsky, "He (Khodorkovsky) then began confronting Mr. Putin, newly installed as Russia's president, more directly and persistently. He spoke out on political matters and spent mightily on public relations efforts in the West to burnish his image as a reformer — moves that drew the ire of Mr. Putin and others. Meanwhile, Yukos spread its financial support among a variety of political parties that promoted the company's business interests. The objective, said a recent report by a local brokerage firm, Sovlink Securities, was to increase Yukos's parliamentary influence and force Mr. Putin "to negotiate with them on an equal-to-equal basis."" (Timothy L O'Brien and Erin E. Aryedlund ‘Putin vs. the Jailed Tycoon: Defining Russia's New Rules’ New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/international/europe/02YUKO.html
?ex=1091505600&en=ccaed12aad46976e&ei=5070&ei=1&en=dffd424a51774
abe&ex=1074049675&pagewanted=print&position= January 2, 2004).

Putin repeated his warnings to the zionist oligarchs, "In February (2003), Mr. Putin had summoned Mr. Khodorkovsky and other tycoons who made financial killings in the early post-Soviet years to a meeting, telling them he wanted to eliminate "the very foundation of corruption," by establishing "a civilized partnership between business and state." His message was clear: businessmen had to follow new rules, rules that included economic order and a respect for government power." (Timothy L O'Brien and Erin E. Aryedlund ‘Putin vs. the Jailed Tycoon: Defining Russia's New Rules’ New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/international/europe/02YUKO.html
?ex=1091505600&en=ccaed12aad46976e&ei=5070&ei=1&en=dffd424a51774
abe&ex=1074049675&pagewanted=print&position= January 2, 2004).

Khodorkovsky refused to comply with putin’s new rules. Whereas gusinsky had attacked putin publicly through his media outlets, khodorkovsky tried to acquire political power to remove putin. He continued to meddle in russia’s domestic politics, "A report from Reuters cited well-connected foreign investors as saying Khodorkovsky was planning to ‘buy’ 150 seats in the Duma: "‘…he was trying to control 150 votes in the Duma,’ said one international banker who asked not to be identified. ‘He had at least 100 people lined up who would vote as he wanted.’ …Putin is known to have been infuriated when Khodorkovsky mobilized support in the Duma earlier in the year to vote down an increase in taxation of oil company profits. ‘They (the Kremlin) believe he was launching some initiative to take over the reins of power and that it was a very well thought out attempt,’ said a prominent investment banker in frequent contact with Kremlin insiders." (‘Richard Perle to the rescue in Russia’ Balkan Analysis http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=232 January 13 2004); "In order to head off an investigation and full public exposure of their ill-gotten gains, the oligarchs, led by Khodorkovsky, ventured into politics, buying political parties by the dozen, including not only Yabloko and the SPS, but also secretly funding the Communist Party." (Justin Raimondo ‘Now They're After Putin: The hypocrites of the "democratic" West set their sights on Russia’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j121003.html December 10, 2003). Basically what khodorkovsky was doing was trying to create the situation in america where the zionist lobby controls the american congress and, during bush’s period in office, the american presidency.

Khodorkovsky not only tried to buy russian parliamentarians and political leaders he also tried to make himself so powerful economically that he would become "untouchable" … "speculation is growing that Yukos' planned merger with a Russian rival, Sibneft, could be blocked by the Kremlin. Some analysts have suggested the proposed merger could be blocked because it would make Mr Khodorkovsky so powerful as to be untouchable." (David Black ‘Kremlin threat to US-Yukos deal’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1011745,00.html August 4, 2003).

Like gusinsky, khodorkovsky thought he could publicly ridicule putin and get away with it, "In September (2003) Khodorkovsky had become publisher of the Moskovskiye Novosti paper and installed a Putin critic as editor." (Paul Jenkins ‘How Moscow kills the truth’ The Observer http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1253251,00.html July 4, 2004).

Even more outrageously from putin’s perspective, khodorkovsky made repeated attempts to sell yukos’s russian oil assets to american oil companies. One possibility was a sale to ChevronTexaco. "ChevronTexaco, the second biggest US oil group, is negotiating to buy a 25% stake worth an estimated £4bn in Yukos, Russia's leading oil company. But industry analysts say the talks could be scuppered by growing Kremlin interference in the privatised energy sector." (David Black ‘Kremlin threat to US-Yukos deal’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1011745,00.html August 4, 2003). A second option which was discussed was a sale to Exxon-Mobil. "ExxonMobil, the US oil giant, is reportedly in talks to take a large stake in the newly merged Russian oil giant, Yukos-Sibneft, for at least $25bn (£15bn)." (Mark Tran ‘Proceed with caution’ Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/economicdispatch/story/0,,1062146,00.html October 13, 2003).

The political consequences of this sale would have been significant. *, loss of control over russia’s resources .. "a deal between Exxon-Mobil and Yukos, a deal which would have enormously enriched a professed political enemy of Putin while putting a large chunk of Russia’s energy supply under the control of an American company." (‘Richard Perle to the rescue in Russia’ Balkan Analysis http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=232 January 13 2004).

**, political protection offered by american companies, "Maybe this is why instead of backing down Khodorkovsky has "openly raised the stakes, buying up liberal weekly Moskovskiye Novosti and hiring a leading Putin critic to run it, while stepping up his own criticism of the Kremlin's totalitarian leanings." Perhaps he feels that he will be able to count on Exxon Mobil to back him in any future confrontations. Says the Moscow Times, "…we had all expected Khodorkovsky to back down by now," said a Moscow-based fund manager who asked not to be identified. "But it seems he has got just too rich and it has gone to his head." (Cdeliso ‘The Oligarchs’ Menace’ balkanalysis.com http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=161 October 19 2003); "Although he is under intense pressure now, the Yukos CEO can perhaps see some light at the end of the tunnel- for the new foreign partner (Exxon-Mobil) to not only enrich but to shield him from Kremlin coercion. The thinking is that bringing in an American oil company will also bring in not only expertise but American political clout. This is why many Russian nationalists fear the deal would harm Russia’s national security. (Cdeliso ‘The Oligarchs’ Menace’ balkanalysis.com http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=161 October 19 2003).

***, the refusal to consult putin, "The collision between Russia's most powerful politician, President Vladimir V. Putin, and its richest businessman, Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, had been brewing for months when Mr. Khodorkovsky took the step that more than any other landed him in prison — trying to sell a major stake in his oil company, Yukos, to ExxonMobil. As recounted by associates and analysts, Mr. Khodorkovsky failed to consult the Kremlin adequately about a deal that would cede substantial control over a strategic Russian resource to a foreign company, and an American one at that." (Timothy L O'Brien and Erin E. Aryedlund ‘Putin vs. the Jailed Tycoon: Defining Russia's New Rules’ New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/international/europe/02YUKO.html
?ex=1091505600&en=ccaed12aad46976e&ei=5070&ei=1&en=dffd424a51774
abe&ex=1074049675&pagewanted=print&position= January 2, 2004). Khodorkovsky must have known his attempts to sell russian resources to american companies would outrage putin. But, it could be argued, he would have made such politically controversial efforts only if he believed that american zionists were powerful enough to force the russian government into abiding by a free market economy.

****, the exchange of assets, "The potential security risks of a Yukos deal were illustrated by a Pravda editorial: "…it is known that the company intends to expand abroad not only thanks to purchase of foreign enterprises but rather through exchange of assets with foreign oil producers. But this simple and innocent method of withdrawing assets out of the country is what particularly scares Russian officials and the "Petersburg team" in the government. Mikhail Khodorkovsky is already now several steps ahead of his opponents. If he manages to go unpunished under the present-day conditions he will win. Indeed, as soon as American shareholders come to YukosSibneft it will be required to treat the company politely." (Cdeliso ‘The Oligarchs’ Menace’ balkanalysis.com http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=161 October 19 2003).

Khodorkovsky also considered another, no less contentious, deal - this time with the chinese, "He (Khodorkovsky) also independently pursued an agreement with the Chinese to build an oil pipeline to China, even though the Kremlin had vetoed a Chinese effort to buy a Russian energy concern last year. " (Timothy L O'Brien and Erin E. Aryedlund ‘Putin vs. the Jailed Tycoon: Defining Russia's New Rules’ New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/international/europe/02YUKO.html
?ex=1091505600&en=ccaed12aad46976e&ei=5070&ei=1&en=dffd424a51774
abe&ex=1074049675&pagewanted=print&position= January 2, 2004).

And, fourthly, Khodorkovsky also continued to meddle in russia’s foreign policy, "Unlike Mr. Putin, he (Khodorkovsky) aligned himself publicly with American policy goals in Iraq." (Timothy L O'Brien and Erin E. Aryedlund ‘Putin vs. the Jailed Tycoon: Defining Russia's New Rules’ New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/international/europe/02YUKO.html
?ex=1091505600&en=ccaed12aad46976e&ei=5070&ei=1&en=dffd424a51774
abe&ex=1074049675&pagewanted=print&position= January 2, 2004).

Khodorkovsky arrested - July 2003.
Despite khodorkovsky’s accumulation of political power, the russian police carried out raids on yukos’s headquarters to investigate its financial probity. Khodorkovsky was arrested shortly afterwards, "Mikhail Khodorkovsky, 40, the multibillionaire who runs Yukos, has already been arrested and questioned over irregularities in his acquisition of the firm from the state. Yukos offices were raided last month and documents taken." (David Black ‘Kremlin threat to US-Yukos deal’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1011745,00.html August 4, 2003).

Platon Lebedev arrested - July 2003.
The raid on yukos led to the arrest of another member of the yukos board - who also happened to be another zionist oligarch. "Some believe this (Putin’s warning to the oligarchs to temper their political ambitions) is behind the arrest of Platon Lebedev, Mr Khodorkovsky's friend at the Yukos oil corporation, plus the charges against that company's security chief. The other interpretation is, of course, that Mr Lebedev faces legitimate questions over whether he stole assets from a state-owned fertiliser plant nine years ago." (Notebook ‘Robber barons are in a whole new ball game’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,991058,00.html July 4, 2003).

Khodorkovsky goes to Prison - October 2003.
Khodorkovsky was sent to prison in october 2003, "Mr. Khodorkovsky failed to heed that message and his arrest in October on murky fraud charges has set off an international debate about Russia's economic and political course." (Timothy L O'Brien and Erin E. Aryedlund ‘Putin vs. the Jailed Tycoon: Defining Russia's New Rules’ New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/international/europe/02YUKO.html
?ex=1091505600&en=ccaed12aad46976e&ei=5070&ei=1&en=dffd424a51774
abe&ex=1074049675&pagewanted=print&position= January 2, 2004).

Leonid Nevzlin forced into Exile - November 2003.
Putin had so far neutralized four of the zionist oligarchs. The political pressure he was exerting against them resulted in another member fleeing into exile, "Nevzlin fled Russia for Israel last week after Khodorkovsky's arrest. He is the second-biggest shareholder in oil giant Yukos, and holds Khodorkovsky's voting rights in the company, according to the Wall Street Journal." (Dafna Maor ‘Hounded Russian oil barons meet in Israel’ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/366788.html 30/11/2003).

The Russian People Exact their revenge on the Zionist Oligarchs.
From the mid 1990s onwards, the russian public had become increasingly resentful of their new zionist masters who were amassing staggering wealth whilst, at the same time, millions of ordinary russians were wallowing into poverty. Thankfully there was a russian politician capable of challenging these zionist bloodsuckers and protecting russian interests. Putin achieved the incredible political feat of neutralizing some of the wealthiest and most powerful figures in russia. What made this accomplishment even greater was that he’d started off as an ally, seemingly a servant, of the zionist elite but within a few short years had ended up becoming their master.

Despite the fact that putin owed many political debts to the zionist oligarchs for their help in appointing him as prime minister and then electing him as president of russia, he was astute enough to realize that, once in power, he no longer needed them to remain as president. His popularity derived mainly from the war in chechnya but he also discovered he could become even more popular by taking action against the zionist oligarchs because of the russian public’s antipathy towards them. In the beginning, the zionist oligarchs had provided putin with wealth and media power to ensure his election as president, but thereafter he only needed to exploit their misdeeds to enhance his political position. Putin had platon lebedev arrested in july 2003; khodorkovsky arrested in october 2003, and forced leonid nevzlin into exile in november 2003. Putin organized these events in the run up to the december 2003 parliamentary elections because he believed they would significantly increase the chances of his party winning that election ­ which is true. He took further measures against the zionist oligarchs in the period prior to the march 2004 presidential election - and won that election too. Justin raimondo has reached a similar conclusion, "Putin acted swiftly, and decisively, outflanking the oligarchs with a crackdown that has proved popular on the Russian "street." (Justin Raimondo ‘Now They're After Putin: The hypocrites of the "democratic" West set their sights on Russia’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j121003.html December 10, 2003).

To a large extent, the zionist oligarchs had only themselves to blame for their meteoric crash. They had acquired fabulous wealth, enormous media power, and so much political influence they were able to ensure the election of two successive russian presidents. If they’d used their wealth and power properly to win the respect or affection of the russian people, their position of power in russia would have been unassailable. But they ignored the russian people and allowed millions to descend into poverty with little prospects for survival. They alienated the electorate to such an extent that when the puppet ruler they’d installed in the kremlin turned against them, they found themselves totally vulnerable to his populist manipulation of the electoral process. Of all the zionist oligarchs only abramovich seemed to realize that they were dangerously adrift from the lives of the russian people. He took action to improve the lives of the russians living within the province he ruled, "Abramovich then became governor of Chukotka, a position he has held for two years. The desolate Russian province has become a sort of personal project for Abramovich - he has spent tens of millions of dollars of his own money building new homes, supermarkets, hotels and cinemas in Chukotka. Critics say his real motives are control over the region's natural resources and perhaps greater political aspirations. Abramovich's assets are managed offshore through his investment fund Millhouse Capital, located in Britain, which Abramovich seems to slowly be making his home." (Kelly Whalen Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/billionaires.html October 28 2003);

The zionist oligarchs had treated the electorate with contempt but, through the miraculous rise to political power of vladimir putin, the russian people were able to exact a substantial degree of political revenge. It was just a shame they were unable to enjoy their revenge in the same way as the french revolutionaries against the equally contemptuous french aristocracy.

The Remnants of the Zionist Oligarchs.
Many of the zionist oligarchs have been arrested, put in prison, or pushed into exile. But some have sought accommodation with putin. As yet none of them has been expropriated of all their wealth. Some of the issues that arose during the zionist oligarchs’ take over of the country in the 1990s have still to be resolved. In other words, it is still too soon to write off zionist oligarchs’ influence over russian politics.

Russia’s oligarchs are not merely people who happen to be jews. They are zionists who regard the zionist state in palestine as their home and who collaborate with other zionists around the world to promote their own interests, the interests of global zionism, and the interests of the zionist state in palestine. It is not possible to understand russia’s oligarchs without an appreciation of their zionism, their zionist allies around the world, and their support for global zionist domination.

Roman Abramovich.
"Billionaire Roman Abramovich, Russia's second-richest man and principal owner of oil producer Sibneft, visited Israel secretly last week to meet with Leonid Nevzlin, the deputy and partner of imprisoned oil baron Mikhail Khodorkovsky." (Dafna Maor ‘Hounded Russian oil barons meet in Israel’ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/366788.html 30/11/2003).

Boris Berezovsky.
Berezovsky took up zionist citizenship in the early 1990s, "There was a minor scandal when it became known that he (like most of the oligarchs) had acquired Israeli citizenship, but he gave up his Israeli passport and everything was in order again. (Uri Avnery ‘The Virgin of Democracy Became a Whore in US, Russia, Israel’ CounterPunch http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery08032004.html August 3rd 2004).

Just to reinforce the international connections of russia’s zionist oligarchs, it has been pointed out that, "One of the Russian oligarchs is the part-owner of the second biggest Israeli newspaper." (Uri Avnery ‘The Virgin of Democracy Became a Whore in US, Russia, Israel’ CounterPunch http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery08032004.html August 3rd 2004); "He (Berezovsky) jointly owns a Russian-language Israeli newspaper with Gusinsky, but has no plans for further investment. However, he will look to invest charitably (in the zionist state) in what he calls "human problems," such as education. (Bret Stephens ‘Boris Berezovsky: Putin's Russia 'dangerous for Israel'’ July 5 2004).

Vladimir Gusinsky.
"Mr Gusinsky has many friends in the west. He is also an Israeli citizen and a powerful figure in the World Jewish Congress, heading its Russian wing." (Ian Traynor ‘Russia turns against irreverent oligarch’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,332213,00.html June 15, 2000). .. "Mr Gusinsky, who is an honorary vice-president of the World Jewish Congress and has Russian and Israeli citizenship." (Helena Smith ‘Russian tycoon goes free’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1063066,00.html October 15, 2003). "He (Berezovsky) jointly owns a Russian-language Israeli newspaper with Gusinsky ..." (Bret Stephens ‘Boris Berezovsky: Putin's Russia 'dangerous for Israel'’ July 5 2004).

Many of russia’s zionist oligarchs have fled to the zionist state in palestine. The zionist state refuses to recognize international laws and refuses to extradite jew back to those countries where they have committed crimes. As far as the zionist state in palestine is concerned, no matter what crimes jews commit around the world they will be given a safe haven in the zionist state. The zionist state does not regard jewish crimes committed beyond its borders as having any judicial substance inside its borders. To put it bluntly, the attitude of the renegade zionist state is that zionists are free to steal from goyim and then find refuge in the zionist state. The zionist state ignores pleas by governments seeking the extradition of jews. "Israel has steadily become a safe haven for East European oil billionaires and organized crime figures of Jewish origin. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Israeli authorities have been complicit in issuing passports to men wanted on international warrants or others who have been identified by western intelligence agencies as prominent organized crime bosses. The advantage of fleeing to Israel is that it does not have extradition treaties with most European nations and maintains a policy of not handing over Jews to any nation, including the United States, its "closest ally." (Fred Lingel ‘Israel Offers Sanctuary to Accused Billionaire-Murderer’ American Free Press Aug 16, 2004 http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=63569). This is why robert maxwell, who stole the life savings of thousands of british pensioners, was given a hero’s burial in jerusalem by the zionist prime minister of the day.

General.
"In the end, there was a reaction: Vladimir Putin, the taciturn and tough ex-KGB operative, assumed power, took control of the media, put one of the oligarchs (Mikhail Khodorkovsky) in prison, caused the others to flee (Berezovsky is in England, Vladimir Gusinsky is in Israel, another, Mikhail Chernoy, is assumed to be hiding here.)." (Uri Avnery ‘The Virgin of Democracy Became a Whore in US, Russia, Israel’ CounterPunch http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery08032004.html August 3rd 2004).

Boris Berezovsky - in the Zionist State of England.
"Britain rejected Russian extradition requests earlier this month (October 2003) for .. media magnate, Boris Berezovsky, and his business partner." (Helena Smith ‘Russian tycoon goes free’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1063066,00.html October 15, 2003). "One of the country's best-known oligarchs, Boris Berezovsky, is currently living in London, where the British government has granted him political asylum. Now he's wanted in Moscow for fraud, and says Kremlin agents are plotting to assassinate him." (Sabrina Tavernise Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/thestory.html October 28 2003); "Berezovsky, who became an Israeli citizen in 1993 but gave it up when he became deputy head of the Russian security council a few years later, says he has no plans to follow other high-profile Russian immigrants, such as Vladimir Gusinsky and Leonid Nevzlin (in exile in the zionist state)." (Bret Stephens ‘Boris Berezovsky: Putin's Russia 'dangerous for Israel'’ July 5 2004).

Brudno, Mikhail & Dubov, Vladimir - in the Zionist State in Palestine.
"They are Mikhail Brudno and Vladimir Dubov, Israeli-Russian partners in the giant Russian oil company Yukos. They, along with a number of their cronies, are wanted by Interpol for allegedly bilking Russian citizens out of billions of dollars. To elude Russian prosecution, these men have taken up residence in Israel. [3] (Alison Weir ‘Russia, Israel and Media Omissions’ http://www.counterpunch.org/weir02172005.html February 17, 2005); "U.S. President George Bush yesterday hosted two Israeli-Russian businessmen who are wanted by Moscow for alleged tax offenses. The two men, Mikhail Brudno and Vladimir Dubov, are shareholders in the giant Russian oil enterprise, Yukos. They currently reside in Israel, along with a business partner, Leonid Nevzelin. They were invited to a White House breakfast as guests of Congressmen Tom Lantos and Christopher Cox. In recent years, Russian authorities began investigating the company, its managers and major stockholders, many of whom are of Jewish origin." (Yossi Melman Israeli-Russians wanted by Moscow hosted at White House’ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/536031.html February 4, 2005); "Brudno and Dubov, who fled to Israel more than a year ago, are shareholders in oil major Yukos and face similar charges as former company CEO Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who was imprisoned in October 2003. The two oligarchs, now Israeli citizens, were invited to Washington by Republican Representative Tom Lantos, a prominent critic of Kremlin policy, to attend a National Prayer Breakfast and meet with government officials. Leonid Nevzlin, another exiled Yukos shareholder wanted in Russia, was also invited, a source in the U.S. Congress said Thursday. Brudno and Dubov had a private session with Lantos and were scheduled to meet with officials from the State Department and National Security Council." (Valeria Korchagina ‘Yukos Fugitives Feted in U.S.’ http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2005/02/04/043.html February 4, 2005).

Mikhail Chernoy - in the Zionist State in Palestine.
Chernoy is believed to be residing in the zionist state in palestine.

Vladimir Gusinsky - in the Zionist State in Palestine.
In april 2001, "Mr Gusinsky, who is in Spain fighting Russian efforts to have him indicted on corruption charges .." (Leader ‘Silencing Russia's media. Mr Blair should not keep quiet’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,,474297,00.html April 18, 2001). Then he moved to greece, "The former Russian media mogul Vladimir Gusinsky, accused of money laundering and fraud in Russia, was yesterday told he was a free man after a Greek court rejected a controversial extradition request. Under Greek law the tycoon's actions "did not constitute a crime," the judge said. Wanted on suspicion of a $250m (£160m) fraud, Mr Gusinsky fled Moscow after disagreements with the Kremlin in 2000. He was arrested on an international warrant at Athens airport in August. The 50-year-old businessman, who once controlled Russia's biggest independent television station, NTV, told judges at an earlier hearing that he would be unable to defend himself in Russia." (Helena Smith ‘Russian tycoon goes free’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1063066,00.html October 15, 2003). Gusinsky is currently residing in the zionist state in palestine. "Now, Greece has refused to extradite Gusinsky and he is on his way back to Israel, where he moved after fleeing Russia in 2000." (Cdeliso ‘The Oligarchs’ Menace’ balkanalysis.com http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=161 October 19 2003).

Mikhail Khodorkovsky - in a Russian Prison.
Khodorkovsky was arrested in october 2003 and is currently in a russian prison.

Leonid Nevzlin - in the Zionist State in Palestine.
"Billionaire Roman Abramovich … visited Israel secretly last week to meet with Leonid Nevzlin, the deputy and partner of imprisoned oil baron Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Nevzlin fled Russia for Israel last week after Khodorkovsky's arrest. He is the second-biggest shareholder in oil giant Yukos, and holds Khodorkovsky's voting rights in the company, according to the Wall Street Journal." (Dafna Maor ‘Hounded Russian oil barons meet in Israel’ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/366788.html 30/11/2003).

The Open Russia Foundation
"According to a Nov. 3 Agence France-Presse story, Khodorkovsky made a deal with Jacob Rothschild this year that control of the yukos giant would pass to Rothschild in the event of Khodorkovsky’s arrest. However, the Russian government has frozen all yukos assets for the time being. It is significant that yukos’s liberal pressure group, the Open Russia Foundation, is completely controlled by Rothschild now that its founder is in jail. As their official mission statement reads, "The motivation for the establishment of the Open Russia Foundation is the wish to foster enhanced openness, understanding and integration between the people of Russia and the rest of the world." Their board of trustees includes Rothschild and Henry Kissinger. The Washington, D.C. launch of the organization included Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) and Librarian of Congress James Billington, one of the leading voices against Russian traditionalism in the academic establishment. Significantly, the Open Russia Foundation recently provided Yale University with substantial grants to study the Russian economy as well as providing the Carnegie Foundation with 3 percent of its entire operating budget." (M. Raphael Johnson American Free Press ‘Countdown to Armageddon? Are the Israelis willing to start World War III?’ http://www.americanfreepress.net/11_07_03/Countdown_to_Armageddon
/countdown_to_armageddon.html April 12 2004).

Carnegie Endowment's Moscow Centre.
"On closer inspection, it turns out that this so-called "mounting criticism" (of putin after beslan) is in fact being driven by a specific group in the Russian political spectrum - and by its American supporters. The leading Russian critics of Putin's handling of the Beslan crisis are the pro-US politicians Boris Nemtsov and Vladimir Ryzhkov - men associated with the extreme neoliberal market reforms which so devastated the Russian economy under the west's beloved Boris Yeltsin - and the Carnegie Endowment's Moscow Centre. Funded by its New York head office, this influential thinktank - which operates in tandem with the military-political Rand Corporation, for instance in producing policy papers on Russia's role in helping the US restructure the "Greater Middle East" - has been quoted repeatedly in recent days blaming Putin for the Chechen atrocities. The centre has also been assiduous over recent months in arguing against Moscow's claims that there is a link between the Chechens and al-Qaida." (John Laughland ‘The Chechens' American friends’ The Guardian September 8, 2004).

The American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC).
The american neocons have set up a committee to oppose russia’s invasion of chechnya ­ this is yet another of their innumerable, and interminable, committees which aims to investigate and promote another aspect of their global aims. Whether the zionist oligarchs have any direct connection with acpc is not known but it would be surprising if they didn’t. "The list of the self-styled "distinguished Americans" who are its (acpc) members is a rollcall of the most prominent neoconservatives who so enthusastically support the "war on terror". They include Richard Perle, the notorious Pentagon adviser; Elliott Abrams of Iran-Contra fame; Kenneth Adelman, the former US ambassador to the UN who egged on the invasion of Iraq by predicting it would be "a cakewalk"; Midge Decter, biographer of Donald Rumsfeld and a director of the rightwing Heritage Foundation; Frank Gaffney of the militarist Centre for Security Policy; Bruce Jackson, former US military intelligence officer and one-time vice-president of Lockheed Martin, now president of the US Committee on Nato; Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute, a former admirer of Italian fascism and now a leading proponent of regime change in Iran; and R James Woolsey, the former CIA director who is one of the leading cheerleaders behind George Bush's plans to re-model the Muslim world along pro-US lines." (John Laughland ‘The Chechens' American friends’ The Guardian September 8, 2004); "The ACPC includes many leaders of the neo-conservative think-tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which advocates American domination of the world. ACPC members who are also in the pro-Israeli PNAC include Elliott Abrams, head of Middle East affairs at the National Security Council; Elliot Cohen of the Pentagon’s Defence Policy Board; Frank Gaffney, president of the conservative Centre for Security Policy; Robert Kagan and William Kristol of The Weekly Standard, the house journal of Washington neo-cons, and former CIA director James Woolsey. Former Reagan defence secretary Caspar Weinberger is also in the ACPC." (Neil Mackay ‘US neo-cons: Kremlin is ‘morally’ to blame for the school massacre’ http://www.sundayherald.com/44741 September 12th 2004).

The exiled zionist oligarchs, many of whom are safely esconsed in the zionist state in palestine, have continued to stir up animosities against putin.

Boris Berezovsky.
"While in exile, Berezovsky launched the Liberal Russia Party, with an anti-Putin platform. Recently he has taken out full-page advertisements in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post, warning the United States not to trust Putin. He also has stated his interest in running in the December 2003 election for a seat in the State Duma (the lower chamber of the Russian parliament), but has yet to announce his official candidacy." (‘Russia’s Fallen Oligarch’ Frontline World http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/moscow/berezovsky.html October 2003); ""Putin is dangerous for Russia, and Putin's Russia is dangerous for Israel," he says. He cites Russia's ties to Saddam Hussein, which it maintained "almost right up until the last minute," as well as those it continues to have with Iran." (Bret Stephens ‘Boris Berezovsky: Putin's Russia 'dangerous for Israel'’ July 5 2004); "Other prominent figures who use the Chechen rebellion as a stick with which to beat Putin include Boris Berezovsky, the Russian oligarch who, like Zakaev, was granted political asylum in this country, although the Russian authorities want him on numerous charges. Moscow has often accused Berezovsky of funding Chechen rebels in the past." (John Laughland ‘The Chechens' American friends’ The Guardian September 8, 2004).

Whilst vladimir gusinsky, mikhail chernoy, and leonid nevzlin, are enjoying a luxurious life in the zionist state, they might meet lady zionist shirley porter, another zionist criminal who fled her adopted country because she’d been manipulating its political system. Perhaps they could all go for a stroll together in jerusalem to worship at the shrine of robert maxwell. Like them, maxwell wasn’t just a thief, a liar, and a zionist warmonger, but a traitor to his adopted country. But he was true to global zionist domination. Uri avnery is right: global zionist domination is damaging people around the world whether they are americans, british or jews.

By the mid-1990s, the zionist oligarchs had taken control of a large proportion of russia’s industries and political system. They were ransacking the country’s resources whilst millions of russians descended into poverty. The oligarchs were planning to sell large parts of russia’s industries to american multi-nationals turning the country into an oversized resource colony with a substantial mass of russian people living in poverty. At best, the zionist oligarchs’ vision of the future might have been america where zionists control congress and the presidency whilst presiding over a lopsided economy ­ great wealth and widespread poverty. But it is doubtful that putin shared such a vision. Putin was unlikely to find america’s poverty, indigenous violence, racism, corruption, and appalling health system, very appealing. He had taken decisive political action to prevent the zionist oligarchs from ruining russia but, in doing so, he had had to sacrifice civil rights, the freedom of the press, and a free and open market - hopefully temporarily. The response of many in the west to putin’s actions was to focus almost exclusively on the issue of civil rights ignoring the bigger issues of zionist domination. Justin raimondo emphasizes the point, "The charges against Putin and the new, post-Soviet Russia are, in short, malarkey ­ so what's the real deal behind this concert of "concern" by Western governments and their media amen corner? The philosopher-kings of the movement for global "democracy" have been gunning for Vlad the Bad ever since he broke up the media monopoly of the Russian oligarchs. But they really went ballistic went he began to arrest some of these oligarchs for stealing, lying, and trying to buy off the Duma from looking too closely into the highly dubious means by which they acquired their great wealth." (Justin Raimondo ‘Now They're After Putin: The hypocrites of the "democratic" West set their sights on Russia’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j121003.html December 10, 2003).

Putin’s sacking of the zionist oligarchs especially infuriated members of the global zionist conspiracy for world domination. They resented losing control over russia which was still, despite its precipitous decline, an important political power on the global stage.

Ian Traynor - It’s Russian Lawlessness not Zionist Lawbreakers.
Ian Traynor, a guardian reporter, seems to believe the fault for the zionist oligarchs’ lawlessness was russia’s for being a lawless country rather than theirs for breaking russian laws. "Wheeling and dealing his way to a colossal fortune during the past decade through the real estate business, banking, and the building of Russia's only independent media empire, Vladimir Gusinsky seems an unlikely candidate for political martyrdom. Nonetheless, his fate is now intimately bound up with the prospects for media freedom and civil liberties in a Russia which is at a crossroads. Mr Gusinsky's detention is a defining moment for the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, only a month after he was inaugurated in the Kremlin. In the past decade, Mr Gusinsky has been a central player in building the new Russia that has now turned against him. He is an "oligarch", one of the notorious band of fabulously wealthy businessmen who are loathed by ordinary Russians for plundering national assets during the lawless Yeltsin years. (Ian Traynor ‘Russia turns against irreverent oligarch’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,332213,00.html June 15, 2000). That traynor believes that gusinsky is a political martyr shows the level of zionist domination amongst guardian journalists.

The Zionist Loving Guardian.
A leader in the guardian accused putin of dictatorial tendencies - ignoring the fight between putin and the zionist oligarchs over the future of the country, "First went the TV station. On Monday the newspaper closed and yesterday the best of Russia's independent news magazines lost its staff. Three strikes and Vladimir Gusinsky, the man who created NTV, Segodnya and Itogi, is out. The blow to critical journalism in Russia is immense. The impression that Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, is even more prickly than his predecessor, Boris Yeltsin, is hard to avoid. It would be naive to think that in this crisis Tony Blair would rush to defend press freedom in Russia. On his last visit to Moscow he refused to be interviewed on Ekho Moskvy, the Gusinsky-owned radio station, for fear of upsetting President Putin. But executive spin in Russia has a far grimmer history than in Britain, and even as controlling a personality as Mr Blair should be worried about what is going on there, and say so." (Leader ‘Silencing Russia's media. Mr Blair should not keep quiet’ The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,,474297,00.html April 18, 2001). The pro-zionist bigotry of this editorial is amazing in so much as it ignores the criminality of the zionist oligarchs and the way they exploited media freedoms to protect their criminal proceeds.


Horizontal Black Line


TERRA FIRM - Issue 1 - - Issue 2 - - Issue 3 - - Issue 4 - - Issue 5 - - Issue 6 - - Issue 7 - - Issue 8 - - Issue 9 - - Issue 10
Issue 11 - - Issue 12 - - Issue 13 - - Issue 14 - - Issue 15 - - Issue 16 - - Issue 17 - - Issue 18 - - Issue 19 - - Issue 20
Issue 21 - - Issue 22 - - Issue 23 - - Issue 24 - - Issue 25 - - Issue 26 - - Issue 27 - - Issue 28 - - Issue 29 - - Issue 30
MUNDI CLUB HOME AND INTRO PAGES - Mundi Home - - Mundi Intro
JOURNALS - Terra / Terra Firm / Mappa Mundi / Mundimentalist / Doom Doom Doom & Doom / Special Pubs / Carbonomics
TOPICS - Zionism / Earth / Who's Who / FAQs / Planetary News / Bse Epidemic
ABOUT THE MUNDI CLUB - Phil & Pol / List of Pubs / Index of Website / Terminology / Contact Us

All publications are copyrighted mundi club © You are welcome
to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge
the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy.
We welcome additional information, comments, or criticisms.
Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk
The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/
1