For many years the mundi club used to argue that global politics was dominated by an alliance between american economic and military might, brutland’s residual colonial power, and jewish finance. Chinese, asians, slavs, and moslems, etc have all been acquiring more wealth and power but at a slower rate than the americans/brutish/zionists. The world’s political axis seemed to revolve around the american-brutish-jewish triage. However, in this work the mundi club reformulates its analysis and gives outright primacy to the zionists. It is increasingly apparent that zionists have control over the american congress and, to varying degrees, the american government and, by implication, not merely the american military but the brutish government whose obsequiousness to american presidents is plain for all to see. It is more than likely that jewish financial power gives the zionists correspondingly enormous political influence over all governments around the world not solely those in america and brutland. However, this work does not deal with the world's financial system nor zionists’ financial influence on political power - these issues are far beyond the mundi club’s competence. Whilst jewish financial power may be a major economic factor sustaining zionists’ political power it is not the only one - and it may not even be the dominant one. There are many highly profitable, jewish-owned industries e.g. retail sales, the diamond industry, the fur industry, etc. But, more importantly, jewish talents in culture, entertainment, and the media, are being transformed into vastly profitable sources of wealth as modern societies undergo structural changes from manufacturing to information based societies. The world’s biggest industries are currently the media and entertainment industries in which jewish talents excel.

The proportion of jews in the most powerful positions in american society from the media, academia, politics, business, and finance, etc., far exceeds the proportion of jews living in america - the same also applies in brutland. In many ways, the rise of jews in american, and brutish, societies can be regarded as an achievement for these countries since it shows they are far from being rampantly racist societies. The problems that are occurring in these countries are not racism, but the use that jews are making of their privileges - in particular, their support for the racist zionist state in palestine.

There are many areas of american political life over which jews have an influence disproportionate to their numbers e.g. the american administration; congress; political parties; and state/local, government.

Over the last three decades, zionists have become so powerful in american politics they are now virtually dictating america’s foreign policies. A part of the reason for this is that most american livestock consumers are so ignorant of the world around them they’re very reluctant to take on responsibilities for foreign issues so they leave it to more worldly wise zionists - george mcbush being the most typical of this phenomenon. This section provides a short history of zionists' increasing domination over american foreign policies.

The american government refuses to recognize, and thus condemn, the zionist state’s possession of nuclear, chemical, and biological, weapons. Noam chomsky argued, "Acknowledgement of the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons would raise the question why all United States' aid to Israel is not illegal under legislation that bars aid to any country engaged in clandestine nuclear weapons development."[1] A subsidiary issue is how the zionist government obtained weapons’ grade nuclear material. Palestine doesn't have uranium resources and nuclear material can't be bought on the open market. So, where did the zionists get it from? Who has been supplying them with nuclear material?

The american government supported the zionists’ invasion of lebanon .. “an Israeli invasion of Lebanon ­ designed to drive the PLO out of the country and given the green light by the then US Secretary of State, Alexander Haig ­ which cost the lives of 17,500 Lebanese and Palestinians, almost all of them civilians.”[2]

In june 1981, the zionists bombed and destroyed osiraq, iraq’s nuclear power station to stop saddam from developing nuclear weapons. The americans condemned such an act of aggression and yet, ten years later, demanded an end to iraq’s capability for producing weapons of mass destruction. The americans are now intent on going to war with saddam for the possibility of having such weapons.

Zionists have used american weapons in contravention of limitations the american government put on their use. For instance, the zionists used an american .. “AGM 114-D air-to-ground rocket made by Boeing and Lockheed-Martin at their factory in ­ of all places ­ Florida, the state where some of the suiciders trained to fly. It was fired from an Apache helicopter (made in America, of course) during the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, when hundreds of cluster bombs were dropped in civilian areas of Beirut by the Israelis in contravention of undertakings given to the United States. Most of the bombs had US Naval markings and America then suspended a shipment of fighter bombers to Israel ­ for less than two months.” [3]

The american government refuses to force the zionist state to abide by un resolutions whilst insisting that zionists’ enemies do so.

In the 1980s many politicians and media personalities were involved in what seemed to be an international campaign to boost ooman rights around the world. Many prominent jewish intellectuals were involved which seemed to show cosmopolitan jewry at its best - trying to make the world a better place for all people.[6] It is not known whether this campaign was deliberately set up by america’s zionist lobby as a front organization to force the soviet government into giving russian jews the ooman right to leave the soviet union and move to palestine or whether, originally, it had a global concern and only came to focus on the soviet union and russian jews as more and more right wing jews joined the campaign. Whatever the cause, the campaign came to focus almost overwhelmingly on the issue of russian jews. Huge amounts of political and public pressure were exerted on the soviet government to give russian jews the right to emigrate. However, the soviet government was far from keen to see its highly educated, highly qualified, and highly skilled, people leaving what had been, up until that time, their own country.

Throughout the 1980s iraq fought a proxy american war against iran, and saddam was feted as the american government’s hero. The zionists denounced america’s support for saddam and its arming of iraq during this war. However, after iraq’s invasion of kuwait, the zionists forced the americans into a reversal of their support for saddam and the american government adopted the zionists’ policy of removing him and demilitarizing (i.e. de-industrializing) iraq.

In april 1990 the zionist lobby in america persuaded the american government to legitimize the zionists’ illegal occupation of jerusalem by recognizing the city as the capital of the zionist state, “On Tuesday, the House of Representatives joined the Senate in declaring Jerusalem as Israel's capital."[8] This showed congress's deliberate flouting of united nations’ resolutions and the extent to which it was dominated by zionist sympathizers. It is possible the zionists managed to persuade the american government into supporting this policy as a means of placating their anger over america’s arming of saddam hussein during the 1980s.

In the autumn of 1990, saddam invaded kuwait. He believed the america government would accept the invasion as iraq’s reward for its proxy american war against iran. Iraq had been at war, on america’s behalf, for ten years. It had led to the deaths of huge numbers of iraqi soldiers and the near bankruptcy of the country’s economy. Saddam was sure that in the interests of fair play, the american government would recognize iraq’s claim to kuwait in order to recoup such losses. What is more, saddam had every reason to believe that if the americans were allowing the zionists to occupy palestine, and had even recognized jerusalem as its capital even though it was in illegally occupied land, then it was perfectly reasonable for him to believe the american government would condone iraq’s annexation of kuwait. The american government seemed willing to countenance the invasion - after all, it could hardly condemn it as illegal only six months after it had legitimized the zionists’ illegal occupation of jerusalem. However, the zionist government was appalled by america’s acquiescence over the invasion. It issued an ultimatum to the american and brutish governments that if they did not attack saddam then the zionists would. The zionists forced the allies into a war with iraq, which for ten years had proven itself to be a staunch ally of the west, even though the allies had no strategic or economic interests at stake in the war. In other words, american and brutish soldiers were killed in the 1991 gulf war solely for the sake of protecting the zionist state - for which ariel bin sharon shows not the slightest gratitude. He not merely continues to spends his time humiliating the united states’ president but denouncing all gentiles as nazis. In the lead up to the 1991 gulf war, saddam stated that if the allies attacked iraq then iraq would attack the zionist state in palestine. The zionists responded by threatening to neutralize iraq.[9] The gulf war, the first proxy zionist war, was the zionists’ first major step towards world domination.

The gulf war showed that america was prepared to go to war against some countries for not abiding by un resolutions (i.e. iraq) but not others (i.e. the zionists). The jews, being a chosen people, claimed a special dispensation for not abiding by ooman laws.

After the gulf war was over, the americans rewarded the zionists for their restraint and were given even more lethal weapons by the americans, "The United States has offered Israel 10 more front line fighter jets and would pay most of the cost of further development of Israel's Arrow missile programme."[10]

In 1991, the zionists used american political power to overturn the united nations’ categorization of the zionist state in palestine as a racist state. Despite the fact that the zionist state in palestine was a segregationist, apartheid government, the americans forced the world to regard the zionist state as a liberal democracy. This was a major ideological turning point whose implications are still with us.

“It is the 5 million refugees whose right to return to their homes in palestine and to be compensated for loss and property damage was recognized by un resolution 194 of december 1948. This resolution has been reaffirmed more than 100 times but never implemented. In 1994, for the first time, the u.s. voted against it in the general assembly .. ”[11]

The zionist state in palestine needed large sums of money to house the hundreds of thousands of russian émigrés whom the zionists had pushed into zionist occupied palestine. The american congress indicated it would give, "$10 billion in loan guarantees for Israel to build housing for Jewish immigrants from the Soviet Union."[12] One commentator pointed out that the idea of a loan for russian jews to build homes in occupied palestine was extraordinary, "The idea of loan guarantees to a foreign power ... is positively bizarre."[13] It was even more extraordinary given that the american government was refusing to do anything substantial to provide housing for its own people.

During the 1990s, the zionist lobby in america used american economic power to blackmail countries around the world into paying billions of dollars in compensation for jewish victims of nazi atrocities during the second world war. According to victoria brittain, “The u.s. supports the return of stolen property to its rightful owners by backing the efforts of the jewish restitution organization. In germany the first agreement between the government and jewish organizations was in 1952 and $60 billion was paid in compensation. German industry last year came under pressure from president clinton and paid between $1b and $2b recompense for the suffering of jewish slave workers under the nazis. Hungary, estonia, the czech republic, poland and france have all passed or drafted laws for the restitution of jewish property. Swiss banks, under pressure from the u.s. have paid back enormous sums to jewish holocaust survivors and their families. No comparable pressure group exists to press for palestinians ..”[21] Is it not rather frightening that zionist and american economic power is able to extort billions of dollars from germany, hungary, estonia, the czech republic, poland, france, and switzerland? Not forgetting, "Austria's efforts to right past wrongs by establishing a fund to compensate former nazi slave labourers after a leading industrialist reportedly attacked the demands for money with an anti-semitic statement. All four parliamentary parties voted on friday in favour of a 6bn schilling (about £275m) fund to be shared among the 150,000 jewish and other slave labourers. The government has pledged to provide at least half of the money and industry is expected to come up with the rest."[22]

The zionist government, and its muppet governments in the united states and brutland, ignored repeated united nations’ resolutions to end its illegal occupation of southern lebanon.

America demanded that slobodan milosovic should be put on trial for crimes against humanity but has treated henry kissinger and ariel bin sharon, both of whom should face charges for war crimes, as heroes. Milosovich should tell the international war crimes commission to get stuffed until kissinger and sharon have been arrested and put on trial. The failure to put sharon on trial makes a mockery of the international judicial system: it even makes a mockery of the nuremberg trials.

America is willing to bomb religious authoritarian governments like the taliban but not religious authoritarian state-terrorists like the zionists in palestine.

Zionist dominance of the american (and brutish) governments is so overwhelming that american (and brutish) people are laying down their lives to save zionist terrorists - many of whom are crypto-nazis.

In september 2001, the united states pulled out of an international conference simply because many of the delegates pointed out that the zionist state was racist, “The united states yesterday pulled out of the united nations’ conference against racism after israel was criticised as “racist and apartheid”. The israeli team also quit the event in south africa in protest.”[23] The only three countries in the world which believe in the fantasy that the zionist state in palestine is not racist are the zionist state in palestine, america, and brutland.

In the autumn 2001, the american government launched a ‘war against terrorism’ (wart) whilst at the same time arming and financing the zionist terrorists slaughtering innocent palestinian civilians and demolishing palestinian homes.

In november 2001 george mcbush stated his support for a palestinian state and tony mcblair invited yasser arafat to downing street. Whilst they may have had doubts about arafat’s ability to unite the palestinian people and control palestinian militants, they accepted him as the palestinians’ primary peacemaker. However, as far as the zionists were concerned yasser arafat was a terrorist despite the fact that he’d renounced violence and signed the oslo peace accords recognizing the zionist state’s right to exist. The zionist lobby in america is so powerful it was able to pressure more and more politicians into accepting its view of him. The american government duly obeyed its zionist master and refused to meet with, or talk to, arafat.

According to christopher hitchens, mcbush jnr allowed sharon to treat the palestinian issue as an internal issue, “Yet it seems that general sharon has been told that he may consider the whole business as an “internal affair”, and treat it as a law and order problem. This is a fantastic abdication of responsibility, and a betrayal of promises made to israeli doves as well as to the palestinians.”[24]

At the beginning of april 2002 the zionist state invaded palestine. This led to the slaughter of palestinian people, widescale damage to palestinian homes, the reduction of the jenin refugee camp to ground zero, and the widescale confiscation of land belonging to palestinians. So what was the reaction of the american government? It insisted that yasser arafat had to renounce violence - again. It did not, however, demand the same of the crypto-nazi terrorists in the zionist government.

Mcbush initially supported the zionists’ invasion of palestine. In effect what this meant was that the zionist state was so powerful it was able to co-opt itself onto the allies’ war against terrorism - even though it is a terrorist state. In effect the war against terrorism was being led by a terrorist state. Andrew stephen argued, “The bush administration has found itself cornered into supporting israel outright with powell (reluctantly, i suspect) toeing the line.”[25]

At the beginning of april, a few days after giving his blessing for the zionists’ invasion of palestine, mcbush ordered the zionist army to withdraw immediately from the occupied areas. He repeated the statement on another couple of occasions and yet, a fortnight later, he was forced into making excuses to explain why sharon still hadn’t obeyed him, the commander in chief of the world’s sole military superpower. The zionists have still not ended their occupation of palestine.

Ever since ariel bin sharon became prime minister he has repeatedly humiliated president mcbush and got away with it. In september 2001 he insulted mcbush by calling him a neville chamberlain. Sharon didn’t even apologize for the insult. In april 2002 sharon just ignored mcbush’s order for the zionist army to withdraw immediately from palestine.

The american government’s leading zionist, paul horowitz, seems to be collaborating with ariel bin sharon over the use of billions of dollars of american taxpayers money to fund the aerial bombardment of iraq, iran, and syria - i.e. countries which are enemies of the zionist state but which pose no threat to america. The american congress unquestioningly support the invasion of iraq, “The campaign for an all-out attack on Iraq continues in full swing with none of the congressional opposition which marked the Gulf war a decade ago.”[26]

"The US record on vetoes cast in UN Security Council constitutes another major achievement of the pro-Israel lobby. The US has cast 73 vetoes out of the 248 cast by all permanent members of the Security Council. On 38 occasions, these vetoes were cast to shield Israel from any criticism directed against its violation of human rights of Palestinians or the territorial rights of its neighbors. On another 25 occasions, US abstained from such a vote. This does not include the votes cast by United States--along with Israel, Tuvalu and Nauru--against UN General Assembly resolutions criticizing Israeli violations of human rights or Security Council resolutions. It would be difficult to maintain that the strategic interests of United States always demanded such a consistent voting record on Palestine." (M. Shahid Alam 'Israel's Proxy War? The Motives For A Flawed War' CounterPunch.org 21.2.2003).

For the last couple of years, but increasingly so after mcbush jnr became president, the american government has been adopting a unilateralist policy in international politics. The cause of this go-it-alone stance is the zionist state in palestine - as will be explored in a later section.

The above points are more than ample evidence of the zionist state’s political influence over the american government’s foreign policies during the 1980s - although far from a dominant influence considering that the americans were using saddam to fight a proxy war against iran. The critical turning point was the 1990 gulf war against saddam. The zionist lobby managed to reverse ten years of american support for saddam which was a considerable feat considering that successive american governments must have felt some considerable gratitude to saddam for fighting their proxy war against iran. Within a matter of a few weeks the zionist lobby had transformed him from an american hero into an american demon. Thereafter, zionists’ have consolidated their dominance over the american government’s foreign policies to such an extent that when the zionists invade another country mcbush jnr legitimizes it by referring to it as the second phase of the wart.

The rise of american unilateralism has been brought about by two factors.

The political, military, and economic, collapse of the soviet empire, left america as the world’s sole military superpower. America’s military dominance was plain to see during the first gulf war when it ignored protests from russia and china. The decade long recession of the japanese economy has left america as virtually the world’s sole economic superpower. America’s economic power enables the american government to increase military spending to virtually any size it deems necessary. As a result of the p*ny bombings there has been a significant increase in the capacity of the american military with further huge increases on the way. American military might is now far beyond that of any other country in the world and is even far greater than that of military alliances between countries e.g. europe. Nick cohen has pointed out, “America spends more on ‘defence’ than the next nine powers - including russia, china, britain, france and germany - put together.”[28] With such enormous economic and military power behind it, the americans can do what they like, “The united states is now a country of such unchallengeable power that it can and does create its own moral and humanitarian stances; it does not need to listen to outsiders. It creates its own myths, and then happily lives by them. Its political leaders believe that the domestic audience is all that matters.”[29]

The refusal of the zionist state in palestine to abide by united nations’ resolutions has meant that it has been a rogue state virtually ever since its formation in 1947. Over the last decade or so the zionist lobby in america has been pushing the american government into joining the zionist state in legal limbo rather than seeing itself as the world’s policeman upholding united nations’ resolutions. There is only one country in the world which has the power and influence to force the zionist state in palestine into abiding by international law but zionist control of the american political system means this power will never be used. The zionist state is a rogue state and the greater the zionist lobby’s control over the american political process, the further it pushes the american government into pariahdom.

After the zionist army had ousted palestinian freedom fighters from the lebanon, the zionists withdrew their forces from most of the country - but not all. They continued to occupy a 10 mile wide buffer zone inside lebanon to protect the zionist state’s northern border. The zionist government ignored repeated united nations’ resolutions to end its illegal occupation of southern lebanon - as did the united states and brutland.

The american government legitimized the zionists’ illegal occupation of jerusalem, “In 1989, after lengthy pressure from the Jewish lobby, the United States' congress formally recognized jerusalem as the capital of israel - even though half the city had been invaded by israel during the 1967 war, illegally annexed, and was under illegal occupation" [31]

“It is the 5 million refugees whose right to return to their homes in palestine and to be compensated for loss and property damage was recognized by un resolution 194 of december 1948. This resolution has been reaffirmed more than 100 times but never implemented. In 1994, for the first time, the u.s. voted against it in the general assembly .. ”[32]

The zionists have used aid from the american government to fund the construction of zionist settlements on illegally occupied land.

The second factor shaping the manner of american unilateralism is the zionist lobby’s political outlook. Ever since the establishment of the zionist state, zionist leaders have been renown for doing whatever they believe is in the best interests of the zionist state - whatever the rest of the world might think about what they are doing. The zionists have a contempt for the world which derives partly from their religious beliefs that they are god’s chosen people (this factor should not be underestimated considering the number of religious and religiously-minded zionists in many zionist governments and in the knesset); partly from the hatred for the world that resulted from the nazis’ treatment of them during the second world war; and, partly from their hatred of the world for not helping the jews when they were on the verge of annihilation in europe. Since 1990, as more and more zionists have gained positions of power with successive united states administrations; within congress; state/local government; and the media; zionists’ contempt for the world has become an increasingly pervasive feature of the american government’s foreign policies.

The zionist state in palestine is a rogue state in the international community because it ignores united nations’ resolutions. Zionists’ dominance over the american political process has led the american government into condoning the zionist state’s failure to abide by un resolutions and, even worse, assisting the zionist state financially and politically to continue ignoring un resolutions. The american government has even broken un resolutions in support of the zionist state e.g. by accepting jerusalem as the capital of the zionist state despite the fact that it is in an illegally occupied area. In effect, the zionist state in palestine has pushed the american government into joining it as a rogue state. At some point in the past, the american government was faced with the choice of abiding by united nations’ resolutions and being a member of the international community or of siding with the zionist state in palestine and becoming a rogue state. It has transparently chosen the latter.

This section highlights further examples of american unilateralism - and checks to see whether any of these policies run counter to, or in support of, zionist aims.

The origins of american unilateralism started under the clinton administration, “The u.s. is poised to pass a law that may seriously undermine the u.n. global treaty banning chemical weapons.”[34]

Sarah left has argued, “In August 2001, George Bush announced the death of this cold war era treaty, in order to allow the US to develop another cold war weapons system, known as national missile defence (NMD) or Son of Star Wars.”[35]

Sarah left again, “In May 2001, officials reporting to Bush kicked the teeth out of the chemical weapons ban by urging him to reject a protocol on inspection. The US said the protocol was insufficient to stop countries producing the weapons, but US pharmaceuticals companies had been lobbying against independent inspections of their facilities for some time.”[36] The american government won’t allow united nations’ inspectors to verify whether it is complying with un laws regarding its chemical and biological weapons programme - even though it is insisting that saddam hussein allows inspectors to ransack iraq’s weapons’ sites. Just as importantly, the americans are also refusing to support the treaty because the zionists do not want united nations’ weapons’ inspectors inspecting the zionist state’s nuclear, chemical, and biological, weapons which, legally, still do not exist.

Sarah left showed americans trying to appease their zionist paymaster’s demand for revenge, “By failing to classify the men captured in Afghanistan as prisoners of war, the US effectively scrapped its recognition of a 50 year old convention to protect those captured during battle.”[37]

Sarah left, “In July 2001, Bush rendered null and void a UN conference to curb the international trade in small arms. The UN wanted a legally binding agreement to reduce the small arms available worldwide. It did not get it.””[38]

Sarah left, “Given all of the above, Bush was clever to back out of this treaty, which ensures that countries abide by the terms of treaties they have signed, even if their legislatures have not ratified them.””[39]

In may 2002, charlotte denny argued, “The US was subjected to a barrage of criticism from its allies yesterday over a series of trade disputes which are threatening to cause a setback for the fragile global recovery. President Bush's decision to slap tariffs on foreign steel imports and pump billions more dollars into subsidising farming has caused outrage among US trading partners. But a heated discussion, at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's annual summit in Paris, of Washington's slide towards protectionism was conducted in the absence of the US administration's top trade official, Robert Zoellick, who left his juniors to take the flak.”[40]

Sarah left has stated, “The Bush administration has been a staunch supporter of the WTO. The president was there to welcome China and Taiwan into the fold last year, and the US has been quick to refer the frequent EU-US disagreements to the WTO, winning the day on beef and bananas. The administration even hopes the WTO will come to its aid over controversial plans to impose steep tariffs on foreign steel imports. Washington argues that the EU should not be allowed to take, well, unilateral action and should wait for a WTO judgement instead.”[41]

Mcbush has refused to abide by the kyoto climate change treaty.[42] The zionist state does not have the slightest interest in global burning so it is not surprising the zionist lobby also takes a mocking stance towards this issue.

According to sarah left, “A year later, the US went one better by having the head of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, Jose Bustani, fired on allegations of financial mismanagement.”[43]

It is believed that mary robinson’s resignation was triggered because of her tough work defending ooman rights. In april 2002 this led to strong criticisms of the zionists’ reoccupation of palestine .. “the united nations’ commission on human rights last week voted 40-5 to condemn israel for its “mass killing” ...”[44] When the zionist state in palestine refused to accept her on the investigating team which was supposed to be sent to palestine to determine what the zionists had done in the jenin refugee camp, her credibility in the commission was clearly at an end, “Israel also sought to dictate the composition of the fact-finding team by making clear that neither Mary Robinson, the UN Human Rights Commissioner, nor Terje Roed-Larsen, the UN coordinator for the Middle East peace process, would be acceptable members. In the event, neither has been appointed.”[45]

Mcbush is neutering the intergovernmental panel on climate change. According to julian borger, “The head of the international scientific panel on climate change was pushed out yesterday after a campaign by the bush administration, exxon-mobil and other energy companies to get him replaced.”[46]

There have been many comments on american unilateralism. Nick cohen has argued, “The determination to destroy the kyoto agreement, the international criminal court, and the anti-ballistic missile treaty says in effect: ‘We are not content with our dominance. We want more’.”[47] Simon tisdall stated, “Mr Bush has gained a partly undeserved international reputation for indifference, or antagonism, to international organisations. He suffered black marks for scuppering the Kyoto climate change treaty, abrogating the anti-ballistic missile treaty, and - in the eyes of his critics - undermining the biological and chemical weapons conventions and efforts to agree international curbs on small arms.”[48]