Over the last fifteen years brutland's pharming industry has triggered off 6 major national disasters and two global disasters. And yet, after each disaster, the pharmer dominated government steps in to financially rescue the Animal slavery industry and restore pharmers to their life of subsidized terrorism whilst leaving pharmers' victims to die, to suffer, or pick up the costs.

The pharming industry's dirty, cannibalistic, practices were responsible for generating and spreading bse.

Edwina currie was sacked for exposing the salmonella in eggs scandal.

The pharming industry is responsible for murdering many bse-cjd victims because the country's pharmers refused to believe that oomans could contract such a disease. Consequently, they refused to take safety measures seriously.

Pharmers have deforested virtually the entire country, they have cut down Hedges, installed drainage systems across the countryside, and adopted prairie pharming methods so why is it surprising that they have been triggering off so many floods?

The foot and mouth epidemic was caused by the criminal activities of pharmers who made one and a half million illegal transports of Animals on bed and breakfast jaunts to boost their fraud of the european community's welfare benefit payments.

The cause of these six national pharming disasters is brutland's corrupt political system. Parliament is dominated by the country's landowning pharming elite which puts its interests first and last and let's everyone else suffer the consequences. This is also why this industry is currently receiving £6 billion a year in subsidies whilst other industries are lucky to receive a mere 1% of this amount. Whilst the pharming industry gets billions, other industries receive only millions. It's not an accident that bse and bse-cjd originated in brutland and that the foot and mouth disease broke out in this country rather than anywhere else in europe. Even though european countries are far closer to the original source of the foot and mouth disease, the disease leapt over other countries to infect brutland's slave Animals. How is it that countries closer to the origins of the disease managed to avoid being infected whilst brutland gets the disease? The reason this country is so vulnerable to diseases is because parliament is full of pharmers who refuse to implement even the most basic health and hygiene practices in the pharming industry because it would reduce their profits.

Over 50% of brutland is used as pastureland. The belief that brutland is a ‘green and pleasant land' is a political delusion induced by propaganda from the country's landowning, pharming elite.[195] Croplands around the country - many of which are grown to feed slave Animals - are all planted, fertilised, protected, managed, harvested, stored, and marketed, with the aid of vast quantities of fossil fuels. Economists rightly used to jest that .. "land is just a way converting petroleum energy into food."[196] Cropland and pastureland are both just green oil slicks.[197] The Plants/Crops/Grasses produced from crude oil aren't much different from plastic plates or shopping bags.[198] As a consequence the countryside's green beauty has an astro-turf nature which, unfortunately, disguises the wholesale devastation of the Earth's life sustaining processes in this country. There is nothing natural about the brutish countryside - its basically one big lawn being mowed by slave Animals. Thankfully, the autumn 2000 floods exposed, in a much more vivid way than government statistics, the sham of the country's belief in its rich and luxuriant Biodiversity. It's just as ridiculous to talk about the country's ‘green and pleasant countryside' as it to talk about the country's ‘green and pleasant motorways'.

One of the commonest images of the brutish countryside is contented looking slave Animals calmly grazing in lush, green pastures which sprawl over rolling hillsides. To most people in brutland, and many abroad, this is THE image of nature, the epitome of a sustainable way of life. What could be more natural than Cows grazing in fields? It's almost as if the aesthetic pleasure of such a scene is proof of the legitimacy of this natural order. What could be greener than the Animal slavery industry - even greens themselves, who should know better, accept this vision of a green society. This image has enabled pharm products especially milk, butter and cheese, to be marketed as a natural product (even though the production of milk requires dairy Cows to be artificially inseminated throughout their lives to ensure constant lactation). The Animal slavery industry's advertising campaigns need only add some gloss to this basic image to ensure the successful sale of their products. The Animal slavery industry has been highly successful in covering up its hideous realities by presenting itself as an industry rooted in nature and of pharmers living in harmony with nature who are ‘custodians of the countryside'.

The consequence of so many members of parliament being pharmers is that they protect their interests against consumers, scientists, Animal rightists, and the Earth. They allow the livestock industry to adapt the cheapest practices which makes the eruption and spread of diseases inevitable.

It is believed that brutland was the first country in the world to start using waste from slave Animals to produce feed for other slave Animals, "There is the suspicion that it was the UK that initiated the practice of feeding animals with their own products."[200] .. "the practice of turning cows into cannibals. Many of us were unaware that, as farmers now tell us, they have been doing it for more than a hundred years."[201]

Chicken manure is still being used to produce feed for slave Animals.

In february 1998, the public health l service warned, "The dumping of untreated human sewage and abattoir waste on britain's farmland poses a serious threat to health, experts warn. .. the public health laboratory service (phls) warns that such practices put people at risk from escerichia coli 0157 infection. Phls scientists (say that) the deadly food poisoning bacterium and viruses such as hepatitis A are present in effluent used to fertilize fields housing livestock or growing vegetables. In the hope that most of the bacteria will die off, the sewage is allowed to stand for up to three months before being used as agricultural fertiliser. But pennington notes that no one knows how long the bacteria remain infective. The chartered institute of environmental health is now demanding a ban on the use of untreated abattoir waste on farms."[202] In august 1998 it was stated, "In europe and north america, between one and two-thirds of sludge - the biosolids from sewers - is now spread on farmland. In the u.s, france, germany and elsewhere, all sludge is treated before being used as fertiliser. It undergoes various forms of heating, drying, fermentation or other treatments that kill germs - to varying degrees - and make sludge more chemically stable. Britain alone allows farmers to put raw sewage on their land, though pressure from food retailers is likely to put a stop to this by 2002. About a quarter of all sewage sludge spread on british farmland this year was raw .. The water companies .. say farmers must wait three weeks before harvesting fodder or letting animals graze on sludged land, and ten months before harvesting crops that touch the soil and are ‘normally eaten raw' - strawberries for example. If the food industry won't buy crops fertilised with raw sludge, farmers won't use sludge. And many water companies are counting on farmers as other disposal routes start to close down. A report on sewage by britain's royal commission on environmental pollution in 1996, and the commons enquiry this year, both .. called for all sludge used in agriculture to be pasteurized, which involves heating at 70C for an hour. Sewage is a valuable resource. Oecd citizens excrete enough to replace 8% of their current consumption of chemical fertiliser - which is made using fossil fuel. Only by keeping faeces separate from the rest of our waste can we realize its full potential."[203] As an example of how deadly the spraying of manure or mixed/organic pharming can be it has been pointed out that, "In 1981, in canada, there was an outbreak of listeriosis monocytogenes in which 41 people died. The infection was traced back to cabbage grown on a nearby farm, "There they discovered that the cabbages had been grown on a field which had previously been grazed by sheep and had, therefore, been richly fertilized by sheep droppings."[204]

After a decade of the bse epidemic, the pharmers in parliament are still allowing their industry to increase its profits by recycling bse-infected Cattle blood as feed for other Cattle. These mps are committing acts of mass murder.

In 1988, thatcher sacked edwina curry for telling the truth about the spread of salmonella in Chicken eggs. After her sacking, "Hundreds of vets were dispatched into the countryside to take samples and conduct tests. Entire flocks (of chickens) found to be heavily contaminated were slaughtered in their hundreds, and millions of pounds were paid out in compensation to the producers."[205] Most egg production is still riddled with this disease.

It is quite incredible but brutland has had scrapie for the last 200 years whilst other countries have managed to get rid of the disease or prevent it from afflicting their herds, "Scrapie has been eliminated completely from german and new zealand Sheep."[206]; "Australia and new zealand are entirely free from scrapie .. because of stringent intervention by the authorities."[207] If it is true that bse derived from scrapie this makes the bse and bse-cjd epidemics even more tragic given that scrapie is a disease which brutish pharmers could have eradicated but never bothered to do so. Scrapie is a disease which, over the last couple of centuries, the landowning pharming elite have decided that the public can live with and die from.

The brutish pharming industry is the creator of three new diseases; feline spongiform Encephalopathy (fse), bovine spongiform Encephalopathy (bse), and ooman spongiform Encephalopathy (bse-cjd). There are few countries which can boast about the creation of a new lethal brain disease but to create three within a matter of years shows the domination of the land owning pharming elite and the malignancy of successive tory governments.

Switzerland, america, australia, canada, and new zealand, have all banned blood transfusions from brutish zombies because of the fear they'll spread the disease, "Meanwhile, the swiss red cross has said it will no longer accept blood donations from people who have lived in britain for more than two months. Red cross officials have been watching the british cases of bse in humans with growing alarm. It is the first such ban to be introduced in europe and will affect around two thousand blood donors in switzerland."[211] It really is time that european governments got together to decide whether the ban on the export of bseef from brutland ought to be extended to more upright members of the brutland's slave Animals.

Belgium and austria are the sixth and seventh countries to ban the blood of uk citizens .. "Belgium, Austria and some german states, as well as switzerland, are already following the example of the united states, australia, canada and new zealand in banning donations from anyone who spent more than six months in the uk between 1980 and 1996, the years in which exposure to bse through infected meat, vaccines, cosmetics or other possible routes was highest."[212] Dealler also includes hong kong, "So far the list of countries that have banned the donation by people that have visited UK for specific length of time: Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, UKA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong."[213]; "Belgium, Austria and some german states, as well as switzerland, are already following the example of the united States, Australia, Canada and New Zealand in banning donations from anyone who spent more than six months in the uk between 1980 and 1996, the years in which exposure to bse through infected meat, vaccines, cosmetics or other possible routes was highest."[214]

In october 2000 the brutish government stopped the medeva company from manufacturing the polio vaccine after discovering the company was using foetal Calf serum from brutish Cattle to grow the polio enterovirus antibiotic, "Vaccine production uses foetal calf serum, from pregnant cows, to help grow cells using different polio strains. A vaccine using the British material was put on the market by Wellcome in 1989. But in 1991 it was bought by Medeva, which added two strains of its own to a new product."[215] Over the years the vaccine has been given to millions of children, "An estimated 35m doses of the vaccine produced by Medeva between 1991 and this week have been given to young children, teenagers receiving booster doses and travellers. It accounted for a third of all oral polio vaccine administered."[216] This is another huge propaganda howler for brutland's Animal terrorism industry - having to admit that the country's biggest vaccine manufacturer has been lying to cover up its use of bovine material from brutish herds.

The factory producing the polio vaccines was a shambles and a virtual hazard to health, "The drug factory at the centre of the polio vaccine scandal has a history of contamination and production blunders, leading to fears that its vaccines against other diseases are unsafe. Last year, investigators from the u.s. food and drug administration were horrified by the conditions they found at the plant in speke, near liverpool, which also makes vaccines against flu, tuberculosis, tetanus, and hepatitis B. Last october the fda's director of compliance, steven masiello, fired off an official warning letter to medeva's head of primary production, john o'brian, telling him to sort out the problems or have its products banned from entering the u.s."[217]

What this case revealed is that neither tory nor labour governments had done anything over the previous decade to ensure companies were following supposedly strict government guidelines, "Today's shocking revelation that a common polio vaccine grown using material from British cows has been in use since early in the bse crisis should perhaps not really be so surprising. The history of incompetence in identifying and managing risk, and a tendency to cohabit with the beef industry rather than with consumers displayed by agriculture and health officials during the crisis, has been glaringly exposed during the two year bse inquiry whose report is published next week."[218]

For generations this country saw nothing wrong with running slaughterhouses which were less hygienic than public lavatories. The slave Animals which graze in fields often end up, to a greater or lesser degree, covered in mud containing multitudes of different micro-organisms - some of which pose a health threat to oomans. When these Animals are loaded onto lorries for transportation they are couped up for anything between 2-48 hours. At the end of the journey, the Animals on the bottom tier tend to be covered in urine and excrement from those above. The longer and more stressful the journey the worse the condition they arrive in. So, when these Animals are eventually shoved into the extermination camps to be shot and dismembered like so many jews before them, they are covered in shit - they're not given a good wash and blow down before having their throat slit. As a consequence, "The guardian first disclosed in march 1989 that only one brutish abattoir in 10 held an e.c. hygiene export certificate."[219]

Richard lacey argued, "Our researches had shown that the disease (salmonella) was endemic in a large majority of british battery-chicken farms. All eggs, including free-range (which come from the same stock as battery hens and are therefore contaminated in their internal organs before they are allocated to either type of husbandry) should be treated with caution."[220]; "The various strains of salmonella are responsible for some 40% of all reported food-poisoning cases in Britain. That annual figure for food-poisoning cases passed the 100,000 mark for the first time in 1997."[221]

In 1988, the tory government introduced the specified offals ban to prevent bse from spreading to oomans. This regulation was a farce because it was based on the maffia's nonsensical hypothesis that bse resides only in specified Cattle offals and not blood or flesh. Like all transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, the disease exists in Cattle blood and is thus also present in meat.

Successive tory governments refused to learn from the bse epidemic because this would have impaired the profits they could obtain from their pharming interests. So it was not surprising when the bse epidemic was followed in 1996 by the e-coli food poisoning outbreak in which 20 people died. In the early 1980s a number of e.coli 0157 cases had been discovered, "This is found in the guts of cattle and is therefore widespread in abattoirs. In cattle it is usually harmless. In human beings it turns into a rogue killer."[223] The government did nothing to minimize the threat posed by this disease.

It has been noted above that the swann report, drawn up during the 1990s, covered not only bse but e.coli. When asked about the e.coli deaths in Lanarkshire he is reported to have stated, "If the recommendations had been implemented, the risk from e-coli 157 would have been considerably diminished." Consumer affairs spokesman nigel griffiths said: "if action had been taken on this report, there is a high possibility that lives may have been saved."[224] The major government suppressed swann's report. It also suppressed a report by hugh pennington which it had commissioned into the Lanarkshire food poisoning disaster. The ‘mirror' was responsible for exposing the government's cover-up of the pennington report - as it had done over the swann report, "Letters warning of the ‘potential timebomb' of contaminated meat were sent to the government weeks before the mirror exposed a cover-up. The letters complained that hygiene regulations were being ignored and that some inspectors who tried to enforce them were being threatened. Douglas hogg .. "denied that a report linking conditions in slaughterhouses to the lethal e-coli food poisoning virus had been suppressed and maintained that standards "were constantly improving". But one letter sent to Food Minister Angela Browning on february 11th said, "Levels of enforcement in hygiene at present leave much to be desired.." The letter from peter comrie, general secretary of the independent association of meat inspectors, added, "Faecal contamination which can lead to e-coli, needs to be more rigorously controlled - without delay." In another letter to the government's Meat Hygiene Service in january, mr comrie wrote, "Far from improving, standards of hygiene are steadily decreasing - with particular reference to faecal contamination in beef .. this is a potential timebomb." Mr comrie warned that inspectors were being threatened in a private letter to the Meat Hygiene Service on march 5th ... He said, "Far from being encouraged to enforce stricter hygiene standards, meat hygiene inspectors are being actively encouraged to ignore breaches of regulations and in some cases threatened if they try to take action. Professor swann backed mr comrie and said, "meat inspectors working in isolation in abattoirs have been threatened with knives and cars have been damaged where they have tried to take a firm line on enforcement issues."[225] Douglas hogg pretended that there had been no cover up of the report and that it had been sent to everyone with responsibilities in this area. When questioned he stated that anne foster, a key member of the pennington committee, knew about the existence of the report. She categorically denied that was true.

A year later, in january 1998, pennington was forced to complain about the speed with which the government was carrying out his recommendations, "The Government has been reprimanded for failing to take measures to clean up food production and reduce food poisoning. Professor Hugh Pennington, the microbiologist at Aberdeen University who investigated the E. coli outbreak in Scotland that killed 20 people last year, says his recommendations have not been implemented quickly enough. His criticism comes on the heels of a warning yesterday by the British Medical Association that all raw meat should be assumed to be contaminated and treated as a potential source of poisoning. The Government will tomorrow publish a long-awaited White Paper on its proposals for a Food Standards Agency, intended as an independent watchdog body monitoring the production and processing of food all the way from plough to plate."[226] In october 1998 it was implied that unscrupulous abattoirs had stopped cheating in 1995 but, as the previous quote implies, it was still going on years after this, "Offal banned for human consumption in britain because of the high risk of transmitting bse to people may have been entering the food chain as recently as 1995, the official bse enquiry was told last week. In his evidence, andrew fleetwood, a senior vet at the ministry of agriculture, described a letter from a consultant to the meat industry dated june 1995, which noted that "unscrupulous abattoirs had cheated."[227]

In conclusion, the tory governments of the 1990s did little about the unhygienic state of brutland's abattoirs except ban reports highlighting what a terrible mess they were in. As a consequence, twenty people died because john major's government refused to act on the points made in swann's damning report.

This .. "is estimated to cause some 600,000 cases of food poisoning in britain every year."[228]

"A record 100,000 people were officially notified to the Public Health Laboratory Service last year as suffering from food poisoning, but scientists estimate that the actual number of such cases could be ten times that figure. Speaking on BBC2's Food and Drink programme, to be screened tonight, Professor Pennington says the figures are "unacceptable" for a type of disease that is preventable. "There is a crisis in British food production. It is not about BSE or healthy eating. It is food poisoning. If they (the Government) are really serious they must implement all the recommendations in my report now.""[229] It has been argued, "The estimated number of food poisoning cases per year in the UK is now approximately 1 million."[230]

"Official figures show extent to which cooking relied on to make products safe, and how few breaches are prosecuted. As many as one in five chickens or turkeys - fresh or frozen - contain food-poisoning bugs, and one in six have other forms of contamination, according to official statistics. The extent to which the food industry depends on restaurants, hotels, burger vans and cooks at home making the final product safe to eat is revealed by figures from official sampling in 1996. Nearly 10 per cent of all types of food sampled failed microbiological tests, and 15 per cent were dirty in other ways. Other poultry products, such as pies and processed food, recorded 13.5 per cent failure rates on food safety. One in 11 samples of fresh or frozen beef were unsatisfactory. One in nine restaurants and take-aways failed microbiological inspections, and one in six had other contamination. One in six ready-made dishes failed in tests for food poisoning bugs. Milk, fish and vegetables also came out poorly in checks administered throughout the food chain and made under legislative powers or after official complaints. The results can be used for prosecutions. Less formal samplings, including regular screening, nevertheless found one in eight fresh and frozen poultry samples failing microbiological tests, and one in six meat checks was unsatisfactory. Nearly one in four other poultry meat products failed. The results show some improvement over 1994, when studies by the Public Health Laboratory Service for the Government's advisory committee on the microbiological safety of food found there was salmonella contamination in a third of chilled fresh chicken and 41 per cent of frozen chicken sampled from supermarkets, butchers, freezer centres and other stores. The national figures, the most recent available, are collated by civil servants but results from local authority checks and prosecutions, which can lead to fines of up to £20,000. They show there were 363 prosecutions for hygiene related failures, including microbiological contamination of food. Of these, 194 were against restaurants and other caterers, and 124 were against shops. In addition, on both food safety and trading standards, 161,711 written warnings were given, 3,119 formal notices to improve issued, 534 formal cautions given, 3,818 seizures or surrenders of food carried out, and 147 premises shut down. Not a single slaughterhouse was prosecuted by councils for hygiene failures in 1996, according to these figures. Forty-one manufacturers and processors were. However, the Meat Hygiene Service - set up in April 1995 as a national agency to police slaughterhouse and cutting plants - has significantly increased prosecutions. In 1995/96 two cutting plants were fined a total of £3,750 and paid £2,763 costs. The next year there were six prosecutions for hygiene offences and nine for failing to comply with specific anti-BSE measures. In 1998 23 firms were convicted of hygiene offences, with fines totalling £60,650 and £28,609 costs. Another 10 were fined £40,000 for failing to meet safeguards. Some in the food industry believe a sense of proportion is needed. ''We are dealing with organisms in the environment, and we are dealing with fresh foods. It is not unreasonable for environmental organisms to contaminate fresh foods,'' said one industry source, while conceding that it had a duty to keep contamination as low as possible. The new Food Standards Agency should lead a far more focused assault. Ministers accept that the impression that the Ministry of Agriculture has been too close to the food industry has also undermined confidence. It will monitor standards of all human food and lead or share policy on food poisoning organisms, animal feed, genetically modified food, food additives and labelling. It could cost £100 million a year, on top of the £150 million a year spent already on food monitoring. The Government wants to charge the nation's 500,000 food outlets £90 a year under a revamped registration scheme to meet up to half those extra costs."[231]

In january 1998, even the conservative brutish medical authority was forced to act, "In a submission to a Commons Agriculture Committee inquiry into food safety, the BMA says: "The state of food safety in the UK is such that all raw meat should be assumed to be contaminated with pathogenic organisms.""[232]

"The government was accused of frantically back-tracking after announcing red meat was safe to eat. One third of cancers are linked to diet but tucking into average amounts of red meat does not increase the risk, according to a labour-appointed study. In september health secretary frank dobson advised people eating normal amounts of red meat to "consider a reduction" to lower their chances of getting the disease. That sparked a furious row and in a U-turn the government now says consumers need not change their ways. .. the report by the committee on medical aspects of food and nutrition policy. The average brit eats three ounces of cooked red meat - beef, lamb, pork, beefburgers and sausages - per day. It is the 15% who eat more than five ounces who could be putting their health at risk. The COMA panel intended to publish its advice in september after considering evidence linking red meat to bowel cancer - which kills 19,000 britons a year. It recommended people who ate five ounces a day should cut down. Then professor philip james, architect of the new food standards agency, persuaded ministers that the advice should be strengthened. He said the committee had been railroaded by the meat industry. James suggested guidelines similar to those from the world cancer research fund, which backs daily consumption of less than three ounces. After yesterday's report chief medical officer kenneth calman said, "Adults who eat more than the average amount of red meat, especially those who eat a lot more, might benefit from a reduction. Average and below average consumers need not change."[233]

The greater the intensity of Animal rearing, the greater the likelihood of diseases spreading amongst the slave Animals, the more antibiotics/hormone growth boosters are used to strengthen Animals' bodies against such diseases and prevent outbreaks of diseases. Brutland has one of the most intensive Animal exploitation industries in the world so it is hardly surprising that there are so many diseases emanating from this country.

Meat is contaminated by superbugs and people eating meat will absorb these micro-organisms making it extremely difficult to ward off infections. The effect this is having on ooman health has started to become apparent in the country's hospitals. In april 1998, "A virulent new superbug has been discovered which could kill people with weak immune systems, it was reported yesterday. The strain is so strong that it cannot be fought with any known drug. The bug Pseudomonas aeruginosa, even shrugs off treatment by carbapenems, the latest high strength range of antibiotics. The bug was discovered by a team led by david livermore, director of the public health laboratory service unit which monitors the emergence of drug resistant bacteria. His discovery follows a report from the house of lords select committee on science and technology which called for a ban on the routine use on farms of drugs related to anti-biotics used to treat human illnesses."[234]"There has been a 12 fold increase in just nine years in patients contracting the mrsa bug, which resists all but the most powerful antibiotics. Poor hygiene by doctors in between treating patients on wards are being blamed for making the outbreak worse."[235]

If all this wasn't bad enough, even the food that had been condemned because it was unfit for ooman consumption was being recycled. The pharming industry's connections with the criminal underworld were such that gangs of criminals were making millions out of salvaging diseased food and selling it to restaurants and major food manufacturers producing popular brands of food, "Health experts last night demanded an inquiry after five men were jailed for britain's worst food racket. The fraudsters sold hundreds of tons of rotten poultry, meant for dog food, to unsuspecting supermarkets, butchers and restaurants nationwide."[236] When the pharming industry boasts that nothing goes to waste they mean this literally - they sell condemned food to prevent it from becoming waste.

Brutland is currently suffering from an asthma epidemic. The reason for this is the vast increase in the numbers of cars polluting the atmosphere but the chances of this being recognized as the main cause of the disease is negligible considering that scientists are currently blaming Mice, "Mice may be partly to blame for the childhood asthma epidemic, scientists said yesterday."[237] If you see any Mice bombing up the motorway at 80mph ask them not to fart. Is it any wonder our organ stealing medical profession is an object of derision around the world?

"The beef-eaters, myself included, have been saved by our resistance - not by the government scientists, the government vets, and the Department of Health, whose advice has been as dangerously bad about BSE and CJD as it was over HIV, haemophilia and hepatitis C. In a less dramatic way, their tardiness in supporting adequate screening for high blood pressure, breast cancer, cervical cancer and prostatic cancer has made these aspects of British medicine the object of the world's derision."[238]

"Infections picked up in hospitals are killing 5,000 people a year, a report warned. The disclosure comes from the house of commons public accounts committee, which calls for the health service to "get a grip" on the crisis which is costing the nhs a £1billion a year. The report found that at least 100,000 patients fall victim each year to hospital bugs."[239]

Pharmers in brutland have cut down virtually all the country's Forests, drained its Swamps and Marshes, and murdered most of its Wildlife until the only Animals likely to be seen are Rabbits and Foxes - and the only reason they didn't exterminate Foxes is because they like to use them as sport. Pharmers have turned the Earth's life support system in this country upside and down and then they have the sheer gall to claim they ought to be given billions of pounds in subsidies so that they can pretend they're custodians of the countryside. This country absorbs a mere 1.4% of its Carbon pollution through Photosynthesis - a level of geophysiological devastation that is almost unparalleled anywhere else on the planet. If this country's Carbon budget was replicated around the Earth by all other countries there would be so much Carbon in the atmosphere that people would bump their heads on it as they opened their front door.

"Downing Street has also vetoed the possibility, again suggested by the unit's major report on the countryside last year, of placing "environmental conditions" on more than £1 billion worth of arable farm subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy."[240]

"The oil industry claims more than 5 million gallons of used car oil (equivalent to one-fifth of the Braer's cargo) is dumped by British DIY enthusiasts into sewerage systems or on the soil each year. Thousands of tonnes of waste pesticides, paints and solvents intended for domestic use are also flushed away each year."[241]

The petrol/benzene mixture, known as benzole, was commonly used during the 1950s but was withdrawn after concerns about public health. Despite this rather shady past benzole was reintroduced as a substitute for leaded petrol. Britain is alone in permitting its use; in Europe and the United States, methyl tertiary butyl ether or MTBE is used; "To produce 'green' unleaded petrol, oil companies boost the levels of benzene."[242] It should hardly be surprising then that the oil industry hails benzene as the green alternative to lead. In other words, a highly toxic additive has been replaced by a known carcinogen. "An alarming feature is that benzene levels are not reduced in unleaded petrol. Scientists say it can be found at even higher levels in super-unleaded, the so-called 'green power-fuel'."[243]

In these days it's impossible for anyone in brutland to set foot outside of their front door without being engulfed in clouds of poisonous car fumes. Whilst in urban areas dirty, smelly, car fumes are an everyday, visible, and pungent, reality, in rural areas people are increasingly affected by the invisible and odourless forms of car pollution in the form of acid rain and tropospheric ozone pollution, "Britain has the worst record in europe for cutting down Carbon dioxide emissions from new cars. The nation's ranking as one of europe's heaviest CO₂ polluters was branded a "shameful disgrace" .. says a new report by transport 2000 and wwf."[244] According to an interview with lord gus macdonald, "The government has conceded defeat in its battle to break britain's ‘car culture' by admitting that vehicle ownership will increase and that it is unrealistic to try to force drivers off the road. Creating cleaner engines was a more efficient and realistic way of improving the environment than simply reducing the number of cars on the roads. The new approach will almost certainly lead to more money being invested in road-building programme. Lord macdonald has already approved a £280 million package of 18 local road schemes and commissioned the highways authority to identify 100 traffic ‘hotspots' for future investment."[245]

"The number of days on which pollution exceeded health standards last year rose by 20% in urban areas - to one day in 13 - and 53% in rural regions to one day in eight. That is the biggest deterioration in air quality since the government began monitoring levels in 1993."[246]

Virtually every single beach in the country is awash with a range of chemical poisons and biological diseases from the pharming industry. Since the second world war, successive governments have insisted on pumping manure a mile out to sea in the hope that, canute like, it won't be washed back onto brutish shores. In 1975 european community countries agreed to a set of minimum pollution standards for water over a ten year period. In the summer 1989, nicholas ridley, secretary of state for the environment, claimed that such standards were "ridiculous, extravagant and unnecessary." While he was secretary of state for the environment he never once bothered to attend a meeting of europe's environment ministers. Lord young, another member of thatcher's band of criminals, called for the abolition of pollution controls. Even today, many coastal waters are afflicted by ooman and livestock manure and Algae covers many brutish shores.

The reason that the brutish environment is not as poisonous as it might be given the quantities of toxic rubbish being produced by brutish industry is because brutland dumps as much of its rubbish as it can onto third world countries, "Plans to plug a loophole in EC regulations which allows Britain to dump 80,000 tonnes of toxic waste in the third world each year will be blocked by the environment minister David Maclean at a meeting in Brussels today. Exporting waste to developing countries (sic) is already banned under the Basle Convention but a loophole which allows the shipment of material due to be "recycled" is being increasingly exploited by British business."[247]

There are those who believe in progress and hold that the brutish environment is healthier than it has ever been in the past. This is, of course, a delusion. There is far more pollution around today than ever before for the simple reason that:-

One of the reasons brutland often stands alone in europe is that europe has higher standards of public cleanliness, hygiene, and environmental standards. There is no mystery why this country is called the dirty man of europe.