3. The Consequences of Britain’s Appalling Carbon Status: The Autumn 2000 Floods show that Britain is an Environmental Disaster Zone. |
||
3.1: The Causes of Flooding.3.1.1: Introduction.
The
three main substantive issues about the autumn 2000 floods are:-
* Firstly, was the rainfall
during the autumn 2000 storms caused by global burning or some other climate
phenomena? * Secondly, were the floods
caused by the state of the environment or by bad weather dropping massive quantities
of rain? In other words, were the floods caused by an unusually large amount
of rainfall which the land, being in good geophysiological condition, could
not absorb or were they caused by moderate amounts of rainfall accumulating
on a devastated environment? At one end of the spectrum, the more unique the
rainfall (whether in quantity or intensity), the better the condition of the
environment, and the more unique the flooding, the more likely it is that the
floods were caused by bad weather. At the other end of the spectrum, the less
unique the rainfall, the more devastated the environment, and the more unique
the flooding, the more likely the floods were caused by the state of the environment.
Then again, it’s possible the floods could have been caused by both bad weather
producing excessive quantities of rainfall and a devastated landscape. What
is of particular interest here is the state of the country’s Photosynthetic
capacity, the Earth’s life support system. Paradoxically, however, even if it
turns out that the floods were caused primarily by global burning this would
not diminish the role played by the decimation of the country’s Photosynthetic
capacity because the latter would have been an important contributor to global
burning - a factor that is dogmatically overlooked by environmentalists. * The third substantive
issue is what should be done to combat such floods. Determining the major cause
of the floods should pinpoint the solutions needed to combat flooding. If the
floods were caused by the unpredictability of the british weather then, perhaps,
little can be done. If, on the other hand, they were caused by global burning
would it be best to build more flood defence systems or restore the Earth’s
life sustaining processes in britain? 3.1.2: The Factors Contributing to Flooding.
There are three main factors
behind flooding anywhere around the world - including the autumn 2000 floods
in britain. 3.1.2.1: Intensity of Rainfall.
One of the critical factors
producing floods is a high intensity of rainfall. The greater the intensity
of a downpour, the more difficult it is for the land to drain the water away,
the greater the likelihood of flooding. If the same amount of rain falls over
a much longer period of time there is far less likelihood of the water overwhelming
rivers and causing floods. 3.1.2.2: Quantity of Rainfall
and State of the Soils.
It is not possible, however,
to dismiss the quantity of rainfall as a source of flooding even when it is
spread out over a long period of time. The quantity of rainfall may cause flooding,
even over long periods of time, because of the waterlogging of soils. If soils
are dry then rain will soak through the ground without flooding. If, however,
the soils are waterlogged it is much more likely there will be a flood. If there
are two equal downpours, one may cause flooding whilst the other may not because
of the difference in the condition of the soils. As a consequence, a heavy downpour
may fail to produce flooding but a few weeks later a lighter downpour causes
flooding because of waterlogging. Thus, the greater the intensity of downpours
or the greater the quantity of rainfall and waterlogging, the greater the likelihood
of flooding. 3.1.2.3: State of the Environment.
The third factor contributing
to flooding is the nature of the terrain. Some terrain encourages waterlogging
and floods whilst other terrains do not. The nature of the terrain differs between,
at one end of the spectrum, a Rainforest and, at the other end, a vast, flat,
featureless, impermeable, landscape such as prairieland or a car park. Rainforests
are able to soak up vast quantities of water. They are vast sponges. One commentator
calls them green lakes because they contain so much water. It is not merely
soils that soak up water - after all the amazon Rainforest has little in the
way of soils. The canopy retains huge amounts of water and it also seals off
the air within the Rainforest so that it absorbs huge quantities of moisture.
On the other hand, a car park simply cannot absorb any rainwater - all it can
do is drain away the water. The more Forested the landscape, the greater the
absorption of water. The more artificial the landscape the more vulnerable it
is to flooding. In general, torrential downpours are more likely to cause flooding
in europe than in brazil. |
GUIDES TO CARBONOMICS - Carb Overview - - Carb Summary - - Importance of the Carbon Spiral |
JOURNAL of CARBONOMICS - Issue 1 / Issue 2 / Issue 3 / Issue 4 / Issue 5 / Issue 6 / Issue 7 / Issue 8 / Issue 9 / Issue 10 |
JOURNAL of CARBONOMICS INDUSTRIES - Introduction |
MUNDI CLUB HOME AND INTRO PAGES - Mundi Home - - Mundi Intro |
JOURNALS - Terra / Terra Firm / Mappa Mundi / Mundimentalist / Doom Doom Doom & Doom / Special Pubs / Carbonomics |
TOPICS - Zionism / Earth / Who's Who / FAQs / Planetary News / Bse Epidemic |
ABOUT THE MUNDI CLUB - Phil & Pol / List of Pubs / Index of Website / Terminology / Contact Us |
All publications are copyrighted mundi
club © You are welcome to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy. |
We welcome additional
information, comments, or criticisms. Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/ |
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/ |