This work has been a long time in coming. Tf2 ‘Ban Cars’ published july 1992 included a section entitled, ‘A Hypothetical Analysis of England’s Carbon Status’. It speculated on the nature of the country’s current Carbon status and its likely Carbon budget - suggesting that if all countries around the world agreed to balance their historical Carbon accounts in order to combat global burning then britain would need to implement a fundamental geophysiological revolution requiring substantial areas of the country to be designated as Wilderness areas and climate Forests i.e. Forests used solely for the purpose of stabilizing the climate. In effect, this work was mapped out in 1992 and it has taken nearly nine years for us to find the time to write up these conclusions.

Over the years a number of notes and quotes have been collected on britain’s Carbon status but, because of the lack of time to write up these notes, they have just been left in the computer gathering dust. However, an article in the september-october issue of ‘renew’ quoted the latest figures for britain’s Carbon emissions and its Carbon absorption showing the country absorbs a mere 1.4% of its Carbon emissions ... “rising to 1.7% in 2010”!! This statement of britain’s Carbon status rekindled enough exasperation to warrant writing an article drawing attention to this truly appalling state of affairs and, secondly, condemning greens trying to combat global burning for their pathetic fixation on reducing Carbon emissions.

It is more than likely that an elaboration of this article would have been delayed for another few years, because of the lack of time to pull the arguments together. But then, by sheer good fortune, in autumn 2000 the floods hit britain and what seemed like proof of the validity of these arguments covered large parts of the country. Before these floods, there was no point in producing yet another devastatingly logical piece of work denouncing england’s appalling 7% Forest cover (or the uk’s similarly appalling 10% Forest cover) nor highlighting the country’s gross unsustainability because it would have been ridiculed by both the andi pandi ghandi green movement and any Earth rapist who might have had the misfortune to come across it. But when proof lies over large areas of the country, the credibility of such a work is that much more difficult to dismiss, so publishing this work suddenly acquired a degree of urgency it had not previously possessed.

This work is divided into four sections. The first highlights some of the geophysiological facts of life. It provides the planetary context for the analysis of britain’s share of the Earth’s life sustaining processes. The second section provides a sketch of britain’s current Carbon status. Even the most superficial analysis of what this country has done to the Earth’s life sustaining processes reveals a truly appalling level of devastation. The third section is an analysis of the autumn 2000 floods in britain pointing out the reasons for the floods, the causes of the floods, and the likely consequences of the floods. These floods are proof of the country’s geophysiological devastation. The final section explores the country’s historical Carbon status and speculates about what the country’s historical Carbon budget might be if oomans around the world suddenly decided they needed to combat global burning. This analysis provides some estimates, albeit very provisional, of britain’s gross unsustainability. This is the first time that waffly concepts such sustainability have been given some scientific rigour. The hope is that this work will provide a model for the compilation of Carbonomics’ reports for other countries. The theoretical basis of this work can be found in Carbonomics issue no.1. For those who know little about this theory the following section provides a quick summary.

Oomano-imperialists delude themselves about their ‘star trek’ future claiming, nobly, they want to meet new life forms on other planets in order to learn new ways of living, acquire masses of scientific knowledge to push back the frontiers of knowledge, and increase the pace of technological advances. Allegedly, these meetings will also offer oomans the chance to parade their achievements and provide another step in the direction of human perfection. In reality, of course, the real purpose of space exploration can be seen in the slaughter and extermination of all the ‘aliens’ who once used to live on Earth and the vast numbers of concentration camps spread around the over-industrialized world. The contrast between oomans’ respect for the civilizations of aliens from other solar systems/galaxies and their contempt for the ‘aliens’ who once lived on Earth could hardly be greater. Quite how oomans are going to convince alien space travellers of their good will, civility, and peacefulness, when the Earth is covered in the blood of oomans’ victims is difficult to appreciate. Aliens visiting the Earth are going to take one look at the carnage oomans are inflicting on the Earth’s Biodiversity and then launch a pre-emptive strike to eradicate these monstrosities before these bipeds start treating everyone else around the universe in the same way as they’ve treated the Earth’s own Wildlife. And, quite possibly, this attack might taken oomans by surprise because they have no sense of embarrassment, shame or guilt, about what they have done and not the slightest inkling that visiting aliens would find such slaughter utterly repulsive or repugnant. The fantasies of the ‘star trek’ loonies are so steeped in the mire of their own barbarism they can hardly appreciate the perspective of civilized ways of thinking. Still it is comforting to think that when these galaxy trotting, livestock trogs get to the pearly gates and find that god is the sum total of all the Animals that have lived on Earth, their days of evil will come back to haunt them.

Eco-nazis are amongst the most pathologically deluded livestock on Earth. They deny the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer, global burning, bse, etc, because there is no scientific evidence. And yet, without the slightest shred of scientific evidence, they believe in delusions about monotheistic gods, a star trek future, and the sustainability of the fivefold expansion of cars, kids, Cattle, capital, and carnage. Sustainability is perverted into a belief in constant economic growth.

The sooner this garbage is off the planet, the greater the chance that some life-form on Earth might survive the looming global burning disaster and manage to keep the Earth alive. But it is more likely that the eco-nazis will cause so much damage before they go, as adolf did at the end of the second world war, that the momentum of destruction will eventually push the Earth’s life support system into oblivion so that it ends up as a boilingly hot, dead planet - the same condition it would have been in before life managed to cool the Earth. Ooman history is the story of lebensraum, “Man stalks across the landscape and deserts follow in his footsteps.” [2] “Throughout history human exploitation of the earth has produced this progression; colonize - destroy - move on.” [3] Today, however, there is virtually nothing left for oomans to desecrate so their fate is not difficult to predict. It is hoped this work will show quantitatively:

It is imperative that people appreciate that geocide could have been avoided but that they were too evil to take evasive action and that what happened was a result of their decisions, or decisions they failed to make. It is impossible to persuade them to live sustainably but it is vital they should be aware of their guilt for what they have done before the planet’s life support system collapses. However, it has to be suspected that oomans’ capacity for denialism and delusions is so great they are almost certain to blame their fate on Wildlife - anything but themselves. The prime cause of the spread of bse was that so many people denied it’s existence. Even when people were dying of the disease, there were those who continued to deny it existed, let alone that it was fatal, let alone that it could cause an epidemic around the world. Benjamin netanayau is interviewed by david frost (bbc1 february 2001) and blames defenceless palestinian children for being shot by the israeli army snipers using high powered rifles. “Lovely to talk to you benjamin” says our snivelling, cretinous, game show host. If people keep denying the truth then eventually they’ll pay the price.