Klare argues iran has vast oil and gas reserves. It has the second largest oil reservoir in the world, "According to the most recent tally by Oil and Gas Journal, Iran houses the second-largest pool of untapped petroleum in the world, an estimated 125.8 billion barrels. Only Saudi Arabia, with an estimated 260 billion barrels, possesses more; Iraq, the third in line, has an estimated 115 billion barrels. With this much oil - about one-tenth of the world's estimated total supply - Iran is certain to play a key role in the global energy equation, no matter what else occurs." (Michael T. Klare ‘Oil, Geopolitics, and the Coming War with Iran’ http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=5540 April 13th 2005). Iran also has the second largest reserves of gas in the world, "According to Oil and Gas Journal, Iran has an estimated 940 trillion cubic feet of gas, or approximately 16 percent of total world reserves. (Only Russia, with 1,680 trillion cubic feet, has a larger supply.)." (Michael T. Klare ‘Oil, Geopolitics, and the Coming War with Iran’ http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=5540 April 13th 2005).

America’s gigantic oil companies could have been helping to exploit these vast resources thereby making huge profits. The scale of these profits can be gleaned from the following facts, "Iran .. has considerable growth potential: it is now producing about 4 million barrels per day, but is thought to be capable of boosting its output by another 3 million barrels or so. Few, if any, other countries possess this potential, so Iran's importance as a producer, already significant, is bound to grow in the years ahead." (Michael T. Klare ‘Oil, Geopolitics, and the Coming War with Iran’ http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=5540 April 13th 2005); "At present, Iran is producing only a small share of its gas reserves, about 2.7 trillion cubic feet per year. This means that Iran is one of the few countries capable of supplying much larger amounts of natural gas in the future." (Michael T. Klare ‘Oil, Geopolitics, and the Coming War with Iran’ http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=5540 April 13th 2005). Klare makes something of an understatement about this potential for profits, "No doubt the major U.S. energy companies would love to be working with Iran today in developing these vast oil and gas supplies." (Michael T. Klare ‘Oil, Geopolitics, and the Coming War with Iran’ http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=5540 April 13th 2005). American oil companies might have a much less sanguine view of this issue.

For the last ten years, however, american oil companies have been unable to exploit iran’s mineral wealth. In the mid 1990s, the neocons persuaded the clinton administration to prohibit oil companies in america, and the rest of the world, from doing business with iran on the grounds that iran was supporting the terrorist organization hezbollah. "A decade ago, Israel and its friends in Washington launched a campaign to convince President Bill Clinton that Iranian support of terrorism and its military buildup endangered Western interests. Tehran’s support of "terrorism" really consisted only of support for Hezbollah against Israel’s illegal occupation of southern Lebanon. The Israeli campaign succeeded in getting Congress to pass the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act (ILSA), which placed American sanctions on any company expending more than $20 million on Iranian oil and gas development. It was all aimed at stopping Iranian support for Hezbollah." (Andrew I. Killgore ‘Neocons Battle Against U.S. Rapprochement With Iran’ Washington Report on Middle East Affairs http://www.wrmea.com/archives/May_2004/0405035.html May 2004, page 35); "At present, however, they (american oil companies) are prohibited from doing so by Executive Order (EO) 12959, signed by President Clinton in 1995 and renewed by President Bush in March 2004." (Michael T. Klare ‘Oil, Geopolitics, and the Coming War with Iran’ http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=5540 April 13th 2005).

The rationale for the 1995 sanctions was iran’s support for hezbollah ­ despite the fact that hezbollah was no threat whatsoever to america and only a defensive threat to the jews-only state. Bush changed the rationale when he renewed the sanctions. The bush administration now deems that iran poses a nuclear weapons threat to america ­ even though, at present, it doesn’t even possess a functioning civil nuclear power programme. The change in the sanctions’ rationale was imperative because it was plainly ludicrous for an american president to sacrifice american oil companies in order to protect the jews-only state in palestine from the miniscule military threat posed by hezbollah. The new rationale was easier for the bush administration to sell to the american public ­ even though iran’s threat to america was entirely fictitious it was much more plausible than the previous rationale. Quite whether this was of any consolation to american oil companies is another matter.

There is, however, an additional piece of evidence which confirms the dominance of the zionist lobby over the american oil industry. If america’s foreign policies were being determined by the oil industry then the american government would have developed a friendly relationship with iran to help with the transportation of oil from the caspian sea. The most economic way of getting oil from the caspian region onto international oil markets is through the construction of an oil pipeline through iran. Such a pipeline, however, would be a disaster for the jews-only state in palestine which supports a much longer, and thus less profitable, pipeline to turkey. "A lot is at stake for the neocons in this latest struggle - perhaps everything, in fact. If the United States reconciles with Iran, the oil pipeline from Baku, Azerbaijan to Ceyhan, Turkey, so passionately sought by Israel, would be in danger. The international oil companies operating in the Caspian Sea region immediately would push for a shorter and cheaper pipeline route - through Iran - to salt water." (Andrew I. Killgore ‘Neocons Battle Against U.S. Rapprochement With Iran’ Washington Report on Middle East Affairs http://www.wrmea.com/archives/May_2004/0405035.html May 2004, page 35).

American oil companies have been losing out on vast profits from iran and the american economy has also consequentially suffered significant economic losses because of america’s jews-only policy of prohibiting trade with iran. However, as far as the neocons in the bush administration are concerned this is of no significance because they believe america’s primary role in the world is not to help its multinational oil companies make profits but to protect the jews-only state in palestine. The world is having a feast at iran’s spectacularly lavish banquet but the americans, controlled by their zionist parasites, are refusing to join in the merriment. The longer this iranian feast persists, the richer and more powerful the world will become whilst america suffers a relative decline.

Given that the americans have put themselves into such a detrimental position over iran, it is highly likely that the bush administration will feel compelled to change the situation. "There is, however, one scenario where the US will not crumple beneath the weight of its own towering debt and sacrifice the dollars’ position as the world’s reserve currency. That is, if the administration is able to control the oil resources of the entire Caspian Basin, the world will have no choice but to continue trading in dollars. This means that the Bush administration can continue its spending spree without regard to its negative affects on the currency. There is one catch, however. The US will have to affect regime change in Iran to achieve its objectives. The fact that the US does not require Iranian oil for its own consumption is irrelevant. (The US only gets a small percentage of its oil from the Middle East; perhaps, 15%). What matters is that the oil can be used to maintain the supremacy of the dollar and as a means of leverage over the burgeoning economies of both Europe and Asia (particularly China). Control of Middle East oil is the only way that America can preserve its standing as the world’s only superpower. This puts Iran at the epicenter of a global crisis. The Bush administration cannot allow the massive Iranian contracts with Japan, China, India and the EU to go forward. They must interpose themselves militarily (under the pretext of disarming Iran) to secure those vital resources and, thus, safeguard their position as the world leader into the coming century. There’s simply no other way." (Mike Whitney ‘The Falling Dollar and the New World Order’ Al-Jazeerah http://www.aljazeerah.info/28%20o/The%20Falling
%20Dollar%20and%20the%20New%20World
%20Order%20By%20Mike%20Whitney.htm February 28, 2005).

America can either try to neutralize the neocons in its midst and start co-operating with iran or it will allow the neocons to push the country into a war against iran. But are all those countries which have invested so much in iran, and which stand to gain so much through future trade with iran, just going to stand by and allow america to stop them from enjoying the iranian banquet? Let’s hope not. Let’s hope they provide iran with all the military weapons it needs to deter an unjust, unprovoked, and pre-emptive, attack.

The neocons are forcing america into committing economic and political suicide for the sake of protecting the jews-only state in palestine. They are doing this firstly by refusing to allow american oil companies to exploit iran’s abundant resources; secondly, by having pushed america into a vastly expensive proxy zionist war against iraq; and, thirdly, by pushing america into another zionist proxy war ­ this time against iran. America’s fall from hyperpower status is not so much self-induced but zionist induced.

The evidence that klare has presented reveals without doubt that the refusal of successive american administrations to develop cordial relationships with iran is responsible for huge losses to america’s oil corporations and to the american economy. This policy was initiated and sustained by the neocons within successive american administrations, the zionist lobby, and the zionist dominated american media. But klare is suffering from so much zionist indoctrination he fails to appreciate his own revelations and reaches conclusions which are decidedly politically kosher, "the current planning for an attack on Iran is fundamentally driven by concern over the safety of U.S. energy supplies, as was the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq." The first bush junior administration often expressed its fear that saddam would refuse to sell iraqi oil to america but this was just another, zionist-inspired, fabrication. Saddam was desperate to sell as much oil as he could to america and any other country around the world. What the bush administration, but especially its neocons, were really worried about was not the highly implausible idea of iraq imposing an oil embargo but what saddam would do with his oil revenues i.e. build up his military power to protect the country against an attack by the jews-only state in palestine. The neocons in the first bush administration forced america into a proxy zionist war against iraq to prevent iraq from rebuilding its military forces. The neocons in the second bush administration are trying to force america into another proxy zionist war to prevent iran from becoming a military threat to the jews-only state. The neocons in the bush administration would be much more accurately described as israeli traitors.

Putting aside iran’s political right to develop civilian nuclear power and its legitimate military right to develop nuclear weapons as a defense against its nuclear neighbours, the main reason it wants to develop civilian nuclear power is because it has vast uranium resources from which it could make substantial profits and extend the life of its fossil fuel resources, "Iran has huge reserves of raw uranium and has announced plans to extract more than 40 tons a year. That amount, if converted to uranium hexafluoride and repeatedly spun in centrifuges, could theoretically yield more than 200 pounds of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium, enough for about five crude nuclear weapons. Iranian officials say the Isfahan plant can convert more than 300 tons of uranium ore a year." (George Jahn , Associated Press Writer ‘Diplomats: Iran Readying Nuke Processes ­ November 19th 2004).

Iran has a growing nuclear industry. It mines uranium deposits; it is creating milling plants to manufacture yellow cake uranium; conversion plants to create uranium hexafluoride; and gas centrifuge manufacturing plants, "Furthermore, Iran has uranium mines in Yazd and is in the process of constructing milling plants to manufacture yellow cake uranium and conversion plants that convert it to UF6 gas.[32] Iran has also begun manufacturing its own gas centrifuges used to enrich uranium. Even if Natanz, Arak, and Bushehr were destroyed in a preemptive strike, Iran probably has duplicate equipment that can be activated and has the know-how to produce more, to pursue a more vigorous and unabated nuclear weapons program in the long term." (Sammy Salama and Karen Ruster ‘A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences’ CNS Research Story September 9, 2004).

The blair government is doing its best to deter iran from developing civilian nuclear power. This seems to suggest that from now on nuclear power should be confined to the over-industrialized nations rather than the under-industrialized nations. What makes his position even more untenable is that whilst he’s denying iran the right to develop civilian nuclear power he is domestically encouraging a huge expansion of britain’s civilian nuclear power industry on the grounds that it is the best way of combating global warming. In effect he is saying that the best means for combating global warming should be confined solely to the nuclear powers. Quite what iran is going to do for energy when fossil fuels have gone and it is banned from using nuclear power is not explained.

There is little doubt that christians have a huge clout in american elections and that they wish to abolish the separation of church and state but whether they have greater control over the republican party, congress, and the presidency, than the zionist lobby is an entirely different matter. What makes this situation so amusing is that it was the zionist lobby, and specifically the neocons, who did so much to bring christians into politics and yet it is now american jews who could suffer considerably at the hands of these born again christian political activists.

In order to understand what is at stake, it is necessary to appreciate the recent, fundamental changes in american christian theology. Over the last couple of decades, christian fundamentalists have morphed into christian evangelists. There is a huge theological gulf between these two types of christianity - even though the vast majority of christians themselves seem to have failed to appreciate that such changes have taken place. But, then again, the wsws editorial board seems just as ignorant of such changes because it continues to use the word "fundamentalist" throughout their article even though most christians these days are referred to as "evangelicals". This name change concerning american christians is not insignificant. Christian fundamentalists are people who believe in a literal translation of the bible. On the other hand, christian evangelists have become convinced by the theory of dispensationalism which, concocted in the 1840s, has only the most tenuous biblical foundations. In other words, christian evangelists are people who still think of themselves as fundamentalists but have failed to appreciate that they are no longer fundamentalists because there is no biblical basis to their belief in dispensationalism. Dispensationalism had been wallowing around in the christian backwaters for nearly a century and a half until the mid 1970s when jewish neocons spotted its huge political potential for the jews-only state in palestine and set out to popularize the theory amongst christians. Jewish neocons coaxed christian fundamentalist leaders into supporting dispensationalism and, in turn, these leaders converted christian fundamentalists into what eventually is now known as christian evangelism.

The phrase ‘christian evangelism’, however, is far from being an accurate description of this religious phenomenon. Such christians are much more accurately defined as dechristianized zionists. This is because firstly, christian evangelism would never have become so popular without the financial, political, and media, assistance of the zionist neocons. Secondly, in converting from a literal translation of the bible to a fictitious view of the return of the so-called messiah, christians have adopted a different theological understanding of god. In effect, they have renounced the traditional christian god of love and forgiveness in favour of the judaic god of war and revenge. In their sermons, christian evangelical leaders spew out the anger, racism, and wroth of the old testament, jews-only god. The christian god loves all people not merely christians whilst the judaic god is concerned exclusively with jews. Most of them do not care how racist the jews-only state is because their primary concern is winning divine salvation ­ even though the christian messiah would find the jews-only state utterly reprehensible and would condemn to eternal hell fire anyone who promoted such a state. It is not possible to regard so-called christian evangelists as christians when they believe in the judaic god of war and support the racism and supremacism of the jews-only state.

In other words, the neocons have zionized christian fundamentalists into dechristianized zionists and have used their political support to push america into supporting the jews-only state in palestine thereby making themselves collaborators in jews-only racism. Dechristianized zionists are racists just like zionists because they finance, arm, and politically support, the jews-only state in palestine. The zionists have turned christians into their political puppets. For the last couple of decades, the zionists have been reaping huge political rewards from the increasingly extreme support which dechristianized zionists have given to the jews-only state in palestine.

In any top-down political emancipation, however, there is always the danger that the puppets will turn on their puppet masters. This is a fear highlighted by the wsws editorial, "the political marriage of the White House, the Republican congressional leadership and the Christian fundamentalist groups represents a growing danger to democratic rights. It is a new stage in the development of an incipient fascist movement in the United States, based on religious hysteria, racism and anti-Semitism. It demonstrates the potential for an escalation of political conflict within the United States to the point of civil warfare." (Editorial Board ‘The Republican Party and the Christian right: sowing the seeds of an American fascist movement’ World Socialist Web Site April 28th 2005).

It is highly likely that over the next decade or so, the zionist inspired, and zionist funded, christian evangelicals are going to fight for the abolition of the separation of church and state which most jews and zionists have publicly supported for many generations. It is possible, however, that extreme right wing, likud loving, neocons whilst publicly opposing such an abolition are privately encouraging such an outcome even though those most affected will be american jews. These jewish racists who believe in a jews-only state in palestine, are likely to regard such a development as being extremely beneficial to the jews-only state.

Dechristianized zionists believe that in order to provoke the premature return of the messiah, that all jews must be in palestine whilst all palestinians must be ousted from the sacred land of the jews-only god. In order to bring this about zionists, and their zionized christian muppets, have firstly got to push american jews back to the jews-only state in palestine and, secondly, carry out the ethnic cleansing of palestinians from their homeland. Over the next decade or so, if dechristianized zionists become more and more powerful, then american jews are going to face the increasing prospect of being exiled to the jews-only state in palestine.

Over the previous decade or two, the big debate over the jews-only state in palestine, has been the possibility of pushing palestinians out of palestine. Various jewish leaders, almost invariably former terrorists and war criminals, have attempted to make life so intolerable for the palestinians that they will be forced to leave their own country. Many american jews have said nothing about palestinians being treated so badly for fear that their protests might hinder or stop such a policy. But now the american jewish lovers of jews-only terrorism against the palestinians face the prospect of suffering the same fate as those they despised so much. The rise of dechristianized zionists has brought the expulsion of the palestinians from palestine ever closer but it is also increasing the threat of expelling american jews to palestine.

So why is it that the wsws editorial board complains about the dominance of christians in the republican party, the congress, and the presidency and says nothing whatsoever about the influence of zionists? It is zionists who dominate both main political parties, congress, the media, and the presidency. Surely the wsws can’t be so political naïve as to believe that zionists do not play any role on modern politics or that zionists weren’t critically involved in mobilizing christians over the last couple of decades? Perhaps the wsws are just chomskyites ­ jews pretending to oppose racism whilst doing everything they could to undermine any political action to abolish the racism of the jews-only state in palestine.

On saturday october 16th 2004, george bush signed into law the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004. This is a clear cut example of zionists using america to fight their own battles. Prior to this bill the state department kept a record of all human rights violations around the world including examples of anti-semitism. Indeed, the state department objected to the bill because it would highlight one particular form of discrimination. According to state department spokesman richard boucher, "We expressed the view that separate reports on different religions or ethnicities were not warranted, given that we already prepare human rights reports and religious freedom reports on 190 countries." (Nicholas Kralev ‘Anti-Semitism Office Planned at State Department’ http://washingtontimes.com/world/20041014-121528-8981r.htm October 14, 2004). However, placing anti-semitism alongside other forms of discrimination is clearly not satisfactory to jews. The form of discrimination they suffer is far more important than that experienced by any other group. So the bill seeks to ensure the state department sets up a special office for jews and records every manifestation of discrimination they suffer whereas other groups will not be afforded such privileges. It has been stated about this bill that, "Under the legislation, the State Department will have to produce an annual report on anti-Semitism around the world and form a specific office headed by a special envoy to document anti-Semitic abuses and design strategies to combat them. It requires the department to document acts of physical violence against Jews, their property, cemeteries and places of worship abroad, as well as local governments' responses to them and take note of instances of anti-Jewish propaganda and governments' readiness to promote unbiased school curricula." (‘Bush signs global anti-Semitism law’ http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/
20041016/wl_afp/us_vote_bush_jews_041016204846 Sat Oct 16, 2004).

The reason that jews want these privileges is firstly because they believe in jewish supremacism, that the jewish race is more important than any other race so it deserves more attention and protection. Jews do not seem embarrassed by the fact that they are being treated as a special case and given special protection obviously because they believe they are the world’s most important race. Secondly, because they can use any information they get about anti-semitism to stir up even more racial hatred against their enemies. Thirdly, because any news about increasing anti-semitism can be presented in an alarmist fashion to encourage more jews around the world to emigrate to the jews-only state in palestine where they can help to oppress and expropriate palestinians. And, fourthly, because jews will be able to use america’s political and military power to force any government around the world to ensure that top priority is given to the protection of jews in their countries at the expense of all other peoples.

The focus on jews-only racism reveals the balance of power in america between jews and americans. What this bill represents is a huge step forward in the process of zionist world domination. It can be suggested that what is really needed is another bill to protect americans from jewish nazis like david holovitz who is pouring out a stream of pro-semitic libels against anyone who points out the racism of the jews-only state in palestine.

In britain a couple of paranoid jewish writers have been screaming about the odour of anti-semitism which they’ve detected in this country. Steven pollard states, "In February, figures showed that anti-Semitic attacks rose to record levels in 2004 - 42 per cent higher than in 2003." (Stephen Pollard ‘Lord Ahmed's unwelcome guest’ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,, 1072-1557932,00.html April 07, 2005). Not wishing to be outdone by another paranoid jewish writer julie birchill screeches, "Britain IS currently playing host to the biggest ever annual number of violent anti-Semitic attacks, both on people and on property, since the 1930s." (Julie birchill ‘British AUT getting 'down wiv the kidz'’ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/
pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=570880&contrassID
=2&subContrassID=4&sbSubContrassID=0 May 4th 2005). Notice the way these jewish loonies are using numerical comparisons to hype up their case. Neither author mentions how many attacks have been inflicted on jews and neither informs us about what proportion of the total attacks on all people are committed against jews. The number of attacks on jews is miniscule in comparison to the attacks on blacks, asians, gays, and even whites. There is virtually no anti-semitism in britain. It is hideous for these jews to stir up the spectre of anti-semitism when moslems are suffering far more abuse. These two articles about anti-semitism in britain say more about the paranoia of these two jews than about what is happening in britain. To give any example of just what a pair of racist bigots they are, birchill believes that her fellow jews in her beloved jews-only state in palestine, "are not bullies." She is really on the borderline of clinical insanity to believe there is less racism in the jews-only state than in britain. Its funny what stuffing lots of white powder up your nose does to people’s perception of reality.

In february 2005, the president of the united states invited members of the zionist criminal fraternity to meet with him in the white house - presumably to talk about how to spread zionist-sanctioned democracy to all countries around the world. Such is the power of the zionist owned media in america that he could do this without fearing that the media would expose his guests as criminals. "You would think it would be hot news when wanted men being hunted by European police suddenly pop up in the US particularly on Capitol Hill and at events attended by the US president. Yet, there was not a single AP story in the US on any of this. Not a single national network television or radio news program even mentioned these facts. In fact, Google and LexisNexis searches four days after these events took place turned up only three newspaper articles on them anywhere in the entire country." (Alison Weir ‘Russia, Israel and Media Omissions’ http://www.counterpunch.org/weir02172005.html February 17, 2005).

The following month, raimondo describes the antics of kay arthur, a popular "Christian Zionist" author and minister, at the convention of the national religious broadcasters who blurted out, "I love America. But if it came to a choice between Israel and America, I would stand with Israel." (Quoted in Justin Raimondo ‘Putting Israel First’ http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.
php?id=0 March 6th 2005).

A few months later a large number of america’s top politicians attend a conference organized by a group under investigation by the fbi for treason. It’s supposedly a lobby group but acts more like an agent for the jews-only state in palestine, "What's transparent about AIPAC is its brazen policy of acting as the agent of a foreign power without making hardly any bones about it ­ and without having to register as such." (Justin Raimondo ‘The Franklin Affair: A Spreading Treason’ http://www.antiwar.com/
justin/?articleid=6068 May 25, 2005).

Nancy pelosi, supposedly a leading american democrat, stands up at the conference and says that when she was in the jews-only state in palestine she felt at home. Any decent, fair minded person would condemn the jews-only state for its 60 year long theft of palestinian property as if it was an army occupying a foreign country. But pelosi dedicates herself to the protection of the occupiers rather than the victims of this hideous occupation, "There are those who contend that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is all about Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. This is absolute nonsense. In truth, the history of the conflict is not over occupation, and never has been: it is over the fundamental right of Israel to exist.

Like a zionist zombie, she virtually promises to fork out even more american money, and lay down even more american lives, for the survival of the jews-only state in palestine. The traitorous lunatic wants america to challenge russia and china not because they pose any threat to the united states but because they have been providing minimal aid to iran. She seems perfectly willing to push the world toward a third world war to protect her beloved jews-only state, "The greatest threat to Israel's right to exist, with the prospect of devastating violence, now comes from Iran. For too long, leaders of both political parties in the United States have not done nearly enough to confront the Russians and the Chinese, who have supplied Iran as it has plowed ahead with its nuclear and missile technology." (Joshua Frank ‘Israel Comes First: Pelosi at AIPAC’ http://www.counterpunch.org/frank05312005.html May 31, 2005).

Then we have larry franklin, an archetypal shabbat goy, passing on american secrets to the jews-only state not for vast sums of money but because of his indoctrinated love and devotion to the jews-only state. "When the FBI finally went in and searched his (franklin’s) office and home, they found a treasure trove of evidence: a total of 83 classified documents. According to the affidavit accompanying the prosecutor's complaint, "approximately 38 were classified 'Top Secret.' 37 were classified 'Secret,'" and "approximately eight" were marked "Confidential." (Justin Raimondo ‘Larry Franklin and the Axis of Espionage’ http://www.antiwar.com
/justin/?articleid=5857 May 6, 2005).

Now we have the formation of ‘jews against anti-christian defamation’, an organization to be run along the same lines as the ‘anti-defamation league’ but which will defend christians. According to don feder, a former ‘boston herald’ writer and syndicated columnist, it is a jews-only organization, "We made a decision at the outset to limit the organization to Jews." What this seems to suggest is that these days no american organization is capable of defending itself unless it is run by jews or has a jews-only organization to defend its interests. It also implies that america’s zionist rulers won’t take on board any issue of interest to america unless jews can interest them in the issue. In other words, the only way that americans can get their grievance aired to their zionist rulers is if they can find jews to represent their case. If christianity wasn’t a religion then in all likelihood this organization would also be run by jews.

The idea of jews feeling a need to defend christians is such a novelty that it begs a lot of questions as to what is actually ahppening in america. Are christians so incompetent that they can’t defend themselves? Have americans become totally incapable of saying or doing anything that hasn’t been initiated, ratified, sanctioned, by jews? Is it possible that nobody’s opinion counts in america unless it is echoed by a jewish organization? Perhaps every american organization ought to have a jews-only parallel organization in order to provide it with a sound defense that only jews are capable of providing.

This is all so laughable and yet zionist indoctrination of americans has gone far beyond a joke. The neocon israeli traitors control the american media, the republican and democratic parties, (not forgetting many fringe parties such as the green party), the congress, the pentagon, the office of homeland security, the cia, the defence intelligence agency, the state department, the national security council, and the presidency. "The neoconservatives are the greatest threat America has ever faced, and they control the Office of the President, the Office of the Vice President, the Department of State, the Department of Defense, and the police-state apparatus known as "Homeland Security." (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Outfoxed by bin Laden’ http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=4898 February 21, 2005). Now wayne madsen has suggested they’re aiming to take control of the super secret National Security Agency (NSA) - America's premier electronic surveillance body. "What has some NSA officials worried is that with pro-Israeli neocons now engrained within the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), State Department, and National Security Council, NSA is ripe for penetration by Israeli intelligence. With outside contractors now permeating NSA and a major Israeli espionage operation being discovered inside the Pentagon, once again there is a fear within NSA that foreign intelligence services such as the Mossad could make another attempt to penetrate America's virtual "Fort Knox" of intelligence treasures and secrets." (Wayne Madsen ‘The neocon power grab at NSA and an attempt to stifle the press’ http://www.online
journal.com/Special_Reports/052405Madsen/052405madsen.html May 24th 2005). The americans are fighting a proxy zionist war in iraq. George bush is ariel sharon’s bitch. And the office of homeland security is just a mossad front organization.

The invasion of iraq has also contributed to the disintegration of the left in both america and britain. The left has preferred to vote for right wing, pro-war, parties such as the democratic party in america and the labour party in britain, rather than for anti-war alternatives. Radicals ought now to give serious consideration to abandoning these allegedly left-wing political parties to form an alliance with those on the right of the political spectrum not merely to oppose the iraq war, and a possible war against iran, but to combat the jewish elite which is pushing america, and britain, into more proxy zionist wars.

The american military was pushed, against its better judgement, into this war by neocons and is now suffering grievously in terms of military losses and military prestige. There are huge political differences between the vietnam war and the iraq war - there were massive anti-war protests throughout the vietnam war whereas as regards iraq anti-war protests virtually stopped after the invasion. Militarily, however, the wars themselves are almost identical. In both cases the american military invaded a foreign country and found itself being humiliated by a rag-tag army of volunteers. And everything it does to combat the enemy makes it look even more barbaric. The consequence is that the american military faces the same humiliation in iraq that it suffered in vietnam. "The fact that America faces as big a national humiliation as it endured in Vietnam is not one much discussed." (Alexander Cockburn ‘The Plame Affair and the Function of Scandals’ http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn07302005.html July 30 / 31, 2005). The war crimes being committed by the american military in iraq are just as morally disgusting as those it perpetrated in vietnam. Perhaps it is too much to expect patriotic americans to be ashamed of the war crimes being committed on their behalf but the world is appalled and revolted by what the american military is doing. Perhaps if so-called american patriots had experienced shame over what the american military did in vietnam they would have been too fearful to support the invasion of iraq and wouldn’t now be suffering so grieviously for the wounds being inflicted on their country by this jewish neocon inspired war.

The idea of exporting democracy to iraq was put forward by neocons prior to the invasion of iraq but it played little role in persuading americans to support the invasion. The idea became popular only after al sistani forced the americans into accepting the need for national elections in iraq. The bush administration started promoting such an idea primarily to rationalize the change in policy that resulted from sistani’s ultimatum.

The muslim world is politically backward because of american domination of the region. That domination stretches back nearly 50 years starting in 1953 with the overthrow of the democratically elected leader of iran. For the last half century, america has propped up every reactionary regime in the middle east preventing any democracy from emerging. The neocon idea of invading islamic countries to establish democracy is a complete fabrication because all they are interested in is the invasion side of the equation. That americans are gullible enough to believe such jewish lies just goes to show the power of the jewish neocons in moulding american minds.

Is it a coincidence that the left has disintegrated in america, britain, and the jews-only state in palestine? Of course not. Jews dominate the left in all three countries. It is their traitorous commitment to the racist jews-only state, ariel sharon, and the so-called gaza peace process, that has brought about this collapse. Basically the jewish left in america and britain have been taking their cue from the jewish left in the jews-only state in palestine. Many left wing jews in america and britain opposed the invasion of iraq, but once it had happened they were happy to see the end of saddam’s threat to the jews-only state and the disintegration of iraq. There is no anti-war protest movement in america and britain because jewish left wingers are not willing to organize them given that the jews-only state in palestine is politically benefitting from the war so much ­ despite the military and financial losses being suffered by america and britain because of the war.

There are those who believe that only paleo-conservatives such as patrick buchanan or libertarians like justin raimondo can counter the political power of the neocons. Whilst there is much to admire in their anti-war polemics they have a marginal political impact on the power of the neocons. The only way of exposing, and deposing, the jewish neocons is if the right and left form a mutual alliance. The basis of such a collaboration is to keep the focus on the jewish neocon establishment which rules america in the interests of the jews-only state in palestine.

It has been stated that, "Bush administration neocons such as Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Libby, along with their cheerleaders at Fox "News", the Weekly Standard, Wall Street Journal editorial page, National Review, and the New York Times' Judith Miller will go down in history as the architects and enablers of the greatest strategic blunder in American history. The neocon dream of conquering the Middle East for Israel and destroying Islam as a force is now in history's trash heap of failed adventures along with such miscalculations as Hitler's march into Russia and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor." (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Leave Now’ http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts07282005.html July 28, 2005). But until left and right unite to sideline the jewish establishment controlling america, the neocons will continue to push the world towards world war three.

In the 1980s, the neocons infiltrated the republican party until now they control it. Since the pentagon and new york (p*ny) bombings and the invasion of iraq, left wing jews have surrendered to their neocon likudnik allies. What this means is that the political priority of both the left and the right should be to challenge the zionist occupied governments of america, britain, and palestine, and the zionist occupied parties which sustain these governments. "Regardless of the particular causes or principles that most move us, that are closest to our hearts, no issue is of greater urgency than breaking the Jewish-Zionist grip on American political, social and cultural life. As long as this power remains entrenched, there will be no end to the systematic Jewish distortion of history and current affairs, the Jewish-Zionist domination of the US political system, Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the bloody conflict between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East, and the Israeli threat to peace." (Mark Weber ‘The Challenge of Jewish-Zionist Power in an Era of Global Struggle’ http://www.ihr.org/other/thechallenge.html July 16, 2005). Unfortunately this sort of alliance seems unlikely given that the traditional left and right seem to prefer to attack each other rather than their zionist masters. The traditional left-right political spectrum has been dead for ages and yet such irrelevance doesn’t seem to stop those on the left and the right from indulging in their politically conventional, slapstick routine.