In the 1970s and 1980s a number of jewish financial predators including james goldsmith, charles clore, [1] isaac wolfson, [2] maxwell joseph, [3] john bentley, and robert maxwell, etc, made huge profits closing down allegedly inefficient brutish industries and throwing large numbers of people out of work. It has been stated that, “Clore and others, like sir isaac wolfson and maxwell joseph, had been demonized for terrorizing family companies and breaking down relationships between employers and workers that had been built up over generations. (Lord attlee) .. once memorably referred to the environment they created as a ‘jungle red in tooth and claw, and particularly clore.” [4] These financial predators ripped through brutish industry and transformed it out of all recognition. It’s interesting then that keith joseph, another jew, was a leading advocate of free market competition who, in effect, provided a justification for the activities of these financial predators. He was a major influence on the ideas of margaret thatcher. What is surprising about this fact of brutish economic life is that so few brutish commentators appear to have noticed that these asset strippers were jewish. The political left are clearly suffering from some sort of anti-racist myopia - pretending not to notice what is going on - perhaps it undermines their masochistic ideology that brutland is a highly racist society in which whites have condemned jews, blacks, and asians, to a life of grinding poverty in sordid ghettos.

In brutland there is also another, longer established, closer knit, group of jews who are bankers, merchant bankers, venture capitalists, etc. They include charles hambro, victor rothschild, jacob rothschild, james hanson, etc. When the brutish government asked jgoldsmith to rescue the ailing slater walker company, the management board he picked .. “was packed with close associates, including his banker charles hambro, victor rothschild, a rothschild banker ivor kennington ...”[5] In another company take-over, jgoldsmith was joined by .. “James hanson and gordon white of hanson ...”[6]; “Goldsmith had acquired his stake (in newmont mining) after striking a deal with his friend lord hanson whereby he and jacob rothschild swapped cavenham forest industries for hanson’s stake in newmont.”[7] Then there was, “Lord mcalpine, chairman of the goldsmith backed oil company, the trans-caucasus energy company ..”[8]

Jewish industrialists/business people include marks and spencers, tescos; “derek vestey, founder of the billion-pound vestey empire.” [10] The vestey empire owned dewhursts.

The goldsmiths are an old jewish family, “Through his father, jimmy (goldsmith) could trace his jewish origins back to the frankfurt ghetto of the 16thc, when the goldschmidts - as they then were - lived along side the rothschilds and the salomons and other jewish banking families who made it big in the 19thc.”[11] Frank goldsmith, father of edward and james, was educated at oxford; became a tory member of parliament; owned “48 of the finest hotels in france”;[12] and was acquainted with members of the aristocracy and royalty in both brutland and france. His family could be described as upper middle class. As a boy, jgoldsmith enjoyed a life of privileges, “His infancy was spent in the grandest suites of europe’s finest hotels as his father travelled from city to city, using private rail carriages for long journeys and his chauffeur driven rolls royce for shorter ones.”[13] The social status of the goldsmith family was clearly revealed in 1954 at the funeral of jgoldsmith’s first wife which was attended by .. “one princess, five duchesses, two marquesses and two counts .. ambassadors from most of the countries of south america and a smattering of rothschilds.”[14] Frank goldsmith’s family lived in the realm where royalty, aristocracy, titles, lineage, mansions, town houses/holiday homes, private schools, privilege, debutantes, playboys, casinos, balls, country sports, etc, were the norm. This is also the realm of society in the sense of the film by the same name, “They were all divorced and married to one another and yet they all gave the impression of living happily together. They didn’t seem to mind too much whose mother slept with whose father and what they produced.”[15]

Jgoldsmith had a succession of affairs with heiresses and members of various national aristocracies - not forgetting the services of large numbers of prostitutes.[16] His first wife was the daughter of a mega wealthy bolivian who had married .. “the daughter of the duke of durchal, a relative of king alphonso xiii of spain.”[17] Only his first mistress (who became his second wife) could be described as being below the usual class status of the women with whom he had relationships. His second mistress (who became his third wife) was annabel birley, the daughter of the 8th marquess of londonderry .. “Her family, the londonderry’s were well-established aristocrats.”[18]; “In taking the former annabel birley as his mistress he acquired one of the most aristocratic women in britain.”[19] His third, and last, mistress (whom he never married) was a french aristocrat, laure boulay de la meurthe .. “a niece of the comte de paris, the pretender to the french throne.”[20] Jgoldsmith used aristocratic women as concubines to build his dynasty.

In 'Jews your partners' (3 November 1990) Miss Amiel reported her embarrassment when, at a ball she was seated next to a man who drew attention to the Jewishness of a number of businessmen who had recently been convicted of financial misdemeanors, such as Gerald Ronson, Ernest Saunders and Michael Milken. Ms. Amiel's tedious interlocutor did not realize that she was Jewish." (Dominic Lawson ‘Taboo or not Taboo, That is the Question’ The Spectator, Nov. 19, 1994 Quoted in Jews to Islam ‘Hollywood Jews’ http://www.jewstoislam.com/viewtopic.php?t=1042 c.2004).

“Hungarian born soros’s dealings forced the pound out of the exchange rate mechanism on black wednesday in 1992.”[25]

Eric schlosser implies that jews dominate the perfume industry, “After world war II, much of the perfume industry shifted from europe to the united states, settling in new york city near the garment district and the fashion houses. The flavour industry came with it, subsequently moving to new jersey to gain more plant capacity.”[26]

According to a pro-zionist website, during the medieval period in europe anti-semitism led to jews being forced to focus on specific industries, very much like the untouchables in india. However, it then goes on to condemn the notion of jews dominating the fur trade, “In Europe Jews were limited to certain trades, often ones that non-Jews found distasteful and relegated Jews to, such as the occupation of furrier. Jews were also excluded from other trades, also due to anti-Semitism which was often official, and has lasted for centuries. The stereotyping of Jews as furriers has long been a hallmark of nazis and other anti-Semites.”[27]

It has been argued that 40% of diamonds are processed in the zionist state in palestine and that the united states imported two-thirds of all polished diamonds exported from the zionist state in 1999. It is believed there are three major sources of diamonds in the world: the zionist state in palestine, belgium and india. It has also been argued that the world diamond trade is a virtual monopoly controlled by DeBeers - the Oppenheimer family - and Lev Leviev - an Israeli citizen from Russia. 50% of all diamond rough is cut in Israel. Jewish cutters and dealers, in large part, control the Belgium diamond industry. Orthodox Jews run the business in NYC.

In africa, the diamond industry has led to civil wars, environmental degradation, and famine. If the rebels in angola hadn’t been able to finance their purchase of weapons with the sale of diamonds from illegal mining, then the civil war against the mapla government would never have ended up becoming the longest war in african history.

According to david leigh, “Africa’s third biggest country, the democratic republic of congo, was on the brink of chaos last night after the shooting of its leader laurent kabila. The man billed as congo’s saviour when he swept to power in 1997 had managed the near impossible feat of becoming more reviled than the veteran dictator he replaced in 1997, president mobutu. Kabila’s promise to steer the congo (formerly zaire) into a bright new era brought nothing but bloodshed and brutality. He only managed to cling to power by signing over, in desperation, diamond mining concessions to president mugabe’s zimbabwe, whose well organized troops have repeatedly bailed him out. All the countries involved in the fighting have been drawn in by the promise of a share of congo’s rich resources of rubber, ivory, timber, copper, gold and other rare minerals.”[28]

According to anton antonowicz, “His country (Mugabe of zimbabwe) is suffering its worst crisis since he came to power after independence 20 years ago. Inflation is soaring at 57%. So is unemployment. There are fuel and power shortages in this once rich country. More than 60% of the population live in poverty. Human rights are treated with contempt. Yet mugabe has treated his country like a sweet-shop, indifferent .. to anything except the satisfaction of his piggish (sic) appetites. He is now among africa’s richest people. But greed never abates. .. a referendum in which voters rejected plans for a new constitution which would have extended mugabe’s rule and allowed him to seize white farms without compensation. And there’s crying need for land reform in a country where less than 2% of the population own two-thirds of the arable soil. It’s simply the way such ‘reforms’ are being carried out. And mugabe’s way is laced with corruption. Last month he toured the south-east of his country, devastated by cyclone eline, which killed 60 people and made 250,000 homeless. There was little the Revered Father could do. His helicopters and at least 11,000 troops are in the democratic republic of the congo fighting rebels. But that’s only half the story. The real reason mugabe has become embroiled in a crippling war outside his national frontiers is because of diamonds. Diamonds for him and for the military bosses he must keep happy. (After his first wife died he married his secretary by whom he’d already had two children). Luxurious houses started being built. National airlines are commandeered for free spending trips to London and the delights of harrods. (An independent reporter in zimbabwe stated), “Since the eighties he’s used land resettlement as his trump card. There’s no control over him and he’s been able to do what he likes. It is, i’m afraid, a story of africa.” [29] It is not known whether antonowicz is a jew or not and what influence this might have had on this article.

“The un security council last week circulated proposals for an embargo on exports of all diamonds from liberia, following similar bans of diamonds from neighbouring sierra leone and angola.” [30]

The following article, "Jews in Porn" has been lifted from the 'Jews to Islam website http://www.jewstoislam.com/viewtopic.php?t=1041 c.2004.

"Jews dominate the production and distribution of porn. Leading pornographers with Jewish names include Wesley Emerson, Paul Fishbein, Herbert Feinberg a.k.a. Mickey Fine, Lenny Friedlander, Bobby Hollander, Rubin Gottesman, Fred Hirsch and his children Steve and Marjorie, Paul "Norman" Apstein, Steve Orenstein, Theodore Rothstein, Reuben and David Sturman, Ron Sullivan, Sam and Mitch Weston (Spinelli).

“After his release from aushwitz at the age of 30, shlomo zabludowcz settled first in sweden and later in finland, going on to found the weapons conglomerate Soltam, one of the pillars of tel-aviv’s military-industrial complex. (Without him) the israeli army would probably never have developed into the unbeatable fighting force it became by yom kippur in 1973. (Shlomo died in 1994 and his a son poju has taken over the business). At one time the zabludowczes even had richard perle, the former united states assistant secretary of defence on the payroll.”[31]

The zionist state is a rogue state because it dismisses united nations’ resolutions. It is a country beyond international law - yet again showing that the jews believe themselves to be the chosen people who have to be treated as special by the rest of oomanity. This seems to create a distinction between oomans and jews - as if jews are tempting people to come along and denounce them for their lack of humanity.

“What we have got instead is UN Security Council resolution 1403, approved last Friday, which says: "The Security Council ... welcomes the initiative of the Secretary General to develop accurate information regarding recent events in the Jenin refugee camp through a fact-finding team and requests him to keep the Security Council informed." This wording was pushed through by the United States, at the behest of Israel, to fend off demands for serious action. Israel objected to calling it an investigation because, as Sharon's chief diplomatic adviser explained, that "kind of alludes to wrongdoing". So, instead of investigating, the UN team will try to find out the facts without any legal powers whatsoever. It cannot subpoena witnesses or order anyone to hand over evidence. Indeed, there is nothing in the UN resolution to suggest that any facts it is lucky enough to discover will necessarily be made public. Israel also sought to dictate the composition of the fact-finding team by making clear that neither Mary Robinson, the UN Human Rights Commissioner, nor Terje Roed-Larsen, the UN coordinator for the Middle East peace process, would be acceptable members. In the event, neither has been appointed.”[32]

“The Israeli government objects to the word "massacre" being used to describe what happened in Jenin refugee camp earlier this month. "Only" 40 or so Palestinians were killed, it says, and they were all terrorists. There are good reasons for believing both these Israeli claims to be false but, even if they were true, the nature of the act is no less important than its scale. Both the International Committee of the Red Cross and Amnesty International say there is enough evidence to justify a full-scale investigation for war crimes.” [33]

* Ariel bin sharon will never negotiate with the palestinians.

Zionist propaganda is divided into three parts. The first is the zionist global conspiracy of silence which seeks to cover up embarrassing political issues. The second is a conventional ideology promoting zionists’ view of themselves and the world, whilst the third is zionists’ propaganda about moslems.

This conspiracy:

The basic tenets of the global, extremist zionist propaganda are as follows:

Prince alwaleed bin talal, a member of the saudi ‘royal’ (sic) family, reputed to be the sixth richest man in the world, handed a cheque for $10 million to ruddy giuliani as a contribution to the twin towers relief fund. However, after reading bin talal’s press statement about his reasons for making the donation, giuliani handed back the donation.

Professor creif complains about references to the zionist junta in palestine, “The references to sharon’s regime, sharon’s circle and sharon’s military amount to a deliberate misrepresentation of the only democratically elected government in the middle east.”[36]

“We want to make the world safe for democracy, and they want to make the Arab world safe from democracy. Americans want to destroy this terrorist menace so that we and all other free nations, including israel, can really enjoy our freedom.”[37]

“Israel has a jewish majority thanks to ethnic cleansing and colonial replacement.”[38]

“Having only half identified the problem, Tutu then avoids mention of the only just solution. The two-state solution he advocates means an apartheid Israel with two Palestinian Bantustans either side. Has he forgotten what that was like?[39]

Beaumont is one of the few journalists who isn’t afraid to speak the truth .. the assassination of the racist Israeli Cabinet Minister Rehavam Ze'evi and claimed dozens of Palestinian lives.” [40]

Hormats insists the american government should take effective military action against the terrorists in afghanistan in order to boost american’s confidence in the economy. This is a new argument. It seeks to use concerns about the faltering health of the american economy to boost support for tough military action. He not merely supports military action against (non-zionist) terrorists but suggests american people would feel much happier if military action is carried out which, in turn, would boost consumer confidence in the economy and thus economic recovery. Shame it didn’t turn out that way. The fact that goldman sachs is a jewish owned company which is promoting a policy that would bring substantial benefits to zionist occupied palestine by removing its enemies, is probably entirely coincidental. He made no recommendation for military action to be taken against the extremists running the zionist-racist state in palestine.

Trump believes america must carry out retribution against bin laden. One of the world’s richest men is urging his country to bring devastation to the world’s poorest country. He doesn’t like the idea of the twin towers being demolished - he owns the empire state building. The wealthier people become, the sicker their outlook on life.

The irrelevance of the brutish parliament to the life of brutish people is becoming more and more blatant. This irrelevance goes beyond the fact that ariel sharon tells mcbush what his foreign policies ought to be and mcbush relays his orders to mcblair. It also goes beyond the fact that multi-national corporations dictate mcblair’s domestic policies. The irrelevance of the brutish parliament can be seen in the fact that brutish mps, both labour and tory, denounce those on the dole for fecklessness whilst handing out vast quantities of welfare benefits to the royal family. They denounce those who are unemployed but fork out billions to the country’s landowning aristocratic elite so that they can sit on their backsides doing nothing. They also pretend that the landowning elites’ livestock are not infected with bse. They argue that bse in bseef is perfectly safe to eat whilst condemning marijuana as such a dangerous drug that dealers and users have to be thrown in prison. Brutish mps proudly proclaim there is no evidence of bse in Sheep, but this fantasy is sustained primarily by scientists who spend their time searching for the necessary evidence in Cattle. Nearly twenty years after the first case of bse in brutland, the brutish government still doesn’t know the scale of bse in the country’s Sheep flocks. Basically the country’s landowning aristocracy and the national pharmers union dictate the country’s pharming policies which is why, over the last twenty years, this country has suffered four major national pharming disasters and triggered off two global epidemics. The epitome of parliamentary irrelevance, however, was mcblair’s laughable reform of the house of lords. Before the reform the hereditary peers voted against a ban on Fox hunting by 450 votes to 50. After the reform the vote was still 450 against and 50 for. It is inconceivable for mps to put upper/middle class Fox hunters in prison if they continue their sadistic activities after a ban has been introduced but it has been perfectly acceptable to put 40,000 lower class people into prison for smoking a harmless weed. If tory mps on both sides of the house of commons get any more snivellingly obsequious towards the royal family and the landowning aristocratic elite they’ll have to transfer the commons’ remaining powers to the house of lords.

At a recent planetary conference, the mundi club agreed on the following demands: