Prior to september 11th there seemed lots of life left in a number of bse and pharming related issues. Although the f&m epidemic had virtually been slaughtered out of existence the political debate seemed to be hotting up over responsibilities for the epidemic. There was hope that a discussion of this epidemic might lead to a radical decision - that the government would never again carry out such an appalling slaughter. But since september 11th politicians seem to almost take it for granted that if such an epidemic happened again they would adopt exactly the same policies. The issue of pharmers’ subsidies was also hotting up. On may 11th 2001 the mundi club had produced a work on the gargantuan subsidies the government was giving pharmers. There was so much information being published about these subsidies that the mundi club publish a second, much enlarged, edition. But now this issue has also become irrelevant - as if it has been completely buried under the ash of september 11th. It’s now back to normal with the government continuing to offer the pharming industry whatever subsidies it wants. The issue of bse in Sheep had been threatening to erupt for many years but when revelations were made about the ‘wrong brains’ experiment the media took up the issue for a couple of days but failed to follow up the implications for bse in Sheep. The issue then quickly disappeared into the black hole created by the september 11th bombings. The government, ever desperate to persuade people to return to normality, encouraged people to eat Sheep and has forked out a few thousand quid for a corporate comic to star in an advert flogging Sheep meat. This doesn’t give the impression that the government is in the least bit bothered about whether there is bse in Sheep. Finally, prior to september 11th there was some anticipation that scientists were nearing the time when it would be possible to obtain an accurate estimate of the scale of the bse-cjd epidemic, and yet after september 11th people seem to have little interest in the topic - after all, when people wonder whether they are going to complete their next aeroplane journey they’re not likely to worry too much about the prospect of dying from a deadly disease in twenty-thirty years. What has typified this transformation of politics after september 11th is tony mcblair. This bseef lover was mired in opprobrium over his slaughter of 3.8 million Animals because they had a common cold. And yet he used september 11 as a trampoline to leap onto the moral high ground where such accusations were made to seem irrelevant. From pharmer-loving butcher to global statesman in a matter of a few hours.

The september 11th bombings are like a natural cut off point for almost fifteen years of problems caused by the pharming industry which started with the discovery of bse. It is almost as if september 11th has brought about not so much the end of f&m and bse but concern about these issues. Politicians are acting as if this is the end of these problems. Virtually all of the restrictions placed on the movement of biped and quadraped livestock have now been lifted. The export of lamb and pork is soon to resume. It won’t be long before bseef is once again being exported around the world - despite the fact that the government is still refusing to carry out tests to determine they have the disease. Consumer livestock are once again eating their fellow livestock. It is as if the september 11th bombings have wiped clean people’s memories of pharmers’ gross criminality, their contribution to a series of epidemics and their extravagant subsidies so the public continues to remain absolutely loyal to them. It doesn’t matter what damage pharmers inflict on the public, the public just loves them.

On a personal level the feeling here is that after fifteen years of pharmer induced disasters society is back to square one. Politicians, pharmers, and consumer livestock have learnt absolutely nothing. It’s like dealing with zombies.

Throughout the 1990s pharmers spread bse around the country, and the rest of the world, by pretending the disease didn’t exist or, if it did that it wasn’t harmful to oomans, or, once it was discovered to be harmful, that it no longer existed in brutish herds. This epidemic resulted in the slaughter of 200,000 Cattle, the execution of 2 million additional Cattle over the age of 30 months, and a compensation bill running at about £1 billion a year. About a hundred people are now dead with thousands, possibly tens of thousands, to follow. Throughout mcblair’s first administration, rural terrorists, worried about the government’s promise to curb their subsidies, travelled around the country like rent-a-mob, lawless, thugs terrorizing people in the same way as they terrorized the Animals on their pharms. The only difference between pharmers’ terrorizing of biped livestock and their terrorizing of quadrapeds was that, in the former case, they were able to extort billions of pounds in compensation. Pharmers’ demands for compensation were a blatant form of political robbery that makes the great train robbery seem like child’s play. Pharmers’ subsidies are currently running at approximately 10,000 times that of the great train robbery.

After the election of the labour government in 1997, mcblair appointed jack cunningham as secretary of state for agriculture to take on the pharmers and reduce the enormous subsidies given to the pharming industry. Cunningham tried to protect consumer health by banning bse-on-the-bone. Pharmers protested about a lack of subsidies by blockading supermarkets, warehouses, ports, etc around the country, “Cattle prices crashed in the bse crisis yesterday - as Cows were auctioned off for the cost of beefburger meal. Premier tony blair appealed for calm and warned pickets that they will make it harder to end a euro ban on british beef. He spoke out after rowdy confrontations in dover, holyhead, fishguard, stranraer and other ports, sparked by farmers who want to keep out cheap irish beef. The PM signalled there will not be extra cash for farmers on top of the amount already being spent on the crisis. Downing street insisted that no “pot of gold” existed to boost farming aid.” [2]

During one of these blockades, pharmers hijacked a lorry and threw its contents into the sea - the police couldn’t be bothered to arrest or charge anyone for the offence and there was no media condemnation - although if the same thing had been done by members of the ALF some corrupt, meat-eating, pharming loving, judge would have given them an exemplary prison sentence longer than that given to murderers. This is a good example of the class nature of brutish politics.

In 1998 pharmers continued blockading industries around the country and helped to organize the countryside march in london. This resulted in mcblair’s capitulation to the pharming industry and thereafter the government provided an exponential increase in pharmers’ subsidies. After the march, pharmers increased their criminal blockading of industries and forced mcblair into sacking jack cunningham. Mcblair’s sacking of jack cunningham was a stab in the back - no different from thatcher’s sacking of edwina curry over salmonella in eggs. Mcblair’s sacking of cunningham was a major success for pharmers’ rent-a-mob tactics so they increased their use of this tactic to win even more concessions from ‘boneless blair’ - the premier who is believed to resemble harold wilson ... except that he doesn’t have the backbone. Their campaign of civil disobedience over the bse-on-the-bone ban was supported by charles windsor and a government minister who both invited the media to witness them breaking the law. Once again, the police couldn’t be bothered to prosecute either of them and the media applauded these criminals for their defiance of the law. This situation suggested that eating a brain rotting disease like bse is to be encouraged but smoking a joint is a terrible crime for which stiff prison sentences are the only answer. This is another good example of the class nature of brutish politics.

In the autumn 1999 pharmers nearly pushed the country into a trade war with france because the french very sensibly refused to eat brutland’s bse-ridden bseef. In the 19thc century the brutish navy forced the chinese government into accepting brutish companies selling heroin to chinese people thereby creating huge numbers of heroin junkies. Politics has not progressed much over the last century. In 1996, brutish pharmers were banned from exporting bseef but this didn’t stop them from trying to force the world into eating their bse-infected shit. This is as stark a case of bioterrorism as is likely to be seen outside of iraq. Forcing a country to consume disease-riddled cadavers is usually regarded as an act of war. If pharmers had succeeded in triggering a trade war with france and europe it would have resulted in millions of people losing their jobs. But this would not have bothered the pharmers because, as would be seen during the f&m epidemic, pharmers were all too willing to sacrifice £64billion industries for the sake of their own £0.5billion industry - an industry which couldn’t exist without massive subsidies.

In 2000 pharmers continued blockading ports and pharming related industries until in september they brought the country close to a political and economic collapse by blockading petrol refineries. Once again, if this had been done by the ALF or greenpeace they would all have been quickly thrown in prison. This is the third good example of the class nature of brutish politics.

Semi-articulate, pharming ignoramuses then spent the next 60 days strutting around the country grunting and whinging about a second fuel tax insurrection if the government didn’t cough up even more pharming subsidies to add to the £6billion annual subsidies they were already receiving. The media rarely mentioned the scale of the subsidies being given to pharmers whilst continuing to denounce dole scroungers. This is the fourth good example of the class nature of brutish politics. Pharmers spent almost all of the first mcblair administration picketing various industries so, it has to be asked, who was running their pharms?

In the autumn 2000 pharmers’ long term devastation of the countryside, was finally exposed when the country suffered massive floods. Over 6,500 people had their homes flooded - many with sewage from local Animal slavery pharms. The floods were so extensive they nearly brought the country to its knees - and pharmers claimed compensation for the damage caused by the floods they were responsible for creating!

At the end of 2000 an Animal welfare activist complained about a pharm on which Animals were being left to die and decompose. The rspca tried to intervene but the pharmer told their officers to go away. The local authority tried to intervene but, once again, the pharmer refused them entry. The maffia was eventually called in but did not punish the pharmer for the state of his pharm. They just asked him to clean it up. The pharm may have been a perfect breeding ground for f&m. In other words, the maffia could have stopped the f&m disease but they were too pro-pharmer to take the necessary action.

F&m was first noticed in february 2001 and, almost immediately, the entire countryside was closed; Wildlife were slaughtered; and large numbers of social fixtures were cancelled. The tourism industry was badly affected - after all what tourists wanted to come to brutland to see one of the most appalling, degenerate, disgusting, events ever to have taken place in this country since .... the mass slaughter of Cattle during the bse epidemic? They didn’t want to see or smell the mass funeral pyres or rotting Animal corpses strewn across the brutish countryside. They didn’t want to breathe in the smoke from funeral pyres containing dioxins and other dangerous toxins. The Animal terrorists have repeatedly stated their aim was to rejuvenate the countryside but all they have done is to push it onto its knees - well done lads.

The reason this f&m epidemic became the biggest outbreak the world has ever known was because of the huge scale of pharmers’ criminal activities in transporting Animals around the country defrauding subsidies from the european union.

During the first mcblair administration, pharmers went around the country blockading industries, breaking the law, acting like thugs. In complete contrast, the victims of their bse bioterrorism were dying quietly and ignominiously. Whilst the government gave pharming scumbags huge subsidies for spreading diseases around the country, the victims of bse-cjd were dying without the specialist care they needed. And whilst the media has ignored the people dying of bse-cjd, it has given pharming scumbags huge amounts of favourable publicity for whatever protests they’ve been engaged in. This is truly a sick and diseased society. The commonplace allegation that criminals have all the rights whilst the victims of crime have none, is nowhere more true than in the pharming industry where pharmers are responsible for murdering dozens of people by spreading a brain rotting disease and yet are given nothing but public admiration. But then what does this indicate other than the appalling class nature of brutish society.

Every time there’s an outbreak of a pharming disease, politicians and media encourage the public to rally around pharmers for being the innocent victims of yet another accidental disease outbreak. But, it has to be asked, is it really feasible that pharmers are the accidental victims of a succession of diseases such as salmonella, bse, swine fever, e-coli, and f&m? Do they deserve tens of billions in compensation for these so-called accidents? Aren’t pharmers a little too accident prone to be entrusted with such vast sums of public money?

The year from september 2000 to september 10th 2001, was one of the most remarkable in brutish history but this was just the culmination of an extraordinary period since the election of the first mcblair government. There has never been a period in brutish history when a group of workers have nearly brought the country to a halt four times within a matter of years and each time over a completely different issue:-

It is surely one of the great ironies of recent brutish history that a prime minister who came into power clearly indicating his intention of reducing agricultural subsidies, eventually found that pharmers had so completely turned the tables on him they were able to dictate whether he should implement a major policy (vaccinating Animals infected by foot and mouth - hereinafter f&m) and, even more strikingly, when he announced the date of the 2001 general election.

In tf16, published in may 1999, the mundi club warned mcblair that his capitulation to the pharming industry after the countryside march in march 1998, could rebound upon him as the tory government’s support for pharmers had rebounded upon them in the 1997 general election. Despite the fact that brutish pharmers’ criminal activities were responsible for the fuel tax insurrection, the autumn 2000 floods, and the f&m epidemic, mcblair seemed intent on subsidizing these red-necked thugs so they could return to their disastrous pharming practices - which, by the way, still includes recycling Animal material for Animal feed. And yet remarkably, he was not electorally punished in the 2001 general election for his first four years in office which was almost exclusively preoccupied with providing the country’s pharmers with seemingly endless subsidies.

It’s bizarre. In 1997 the major government chose to provide subsidies for pharmers with bse-infected Animals rather than reducing income tax which might have encouraged more people to vote for the tory party at the general election. They lost by a landslide. Mcblair provided an even greater quantity of subsidies for pharmers as a result of the fuel tax insurrection, the mass flooding of autumn 2000, and the f&m epidemic, and yet he won the 2001 election by a landslide. Mcblair’s only punishment was that he won on the lowest turnout since 1918 as millions of urbanites were sickened by his exclusive devotion to pharmers’ interests.

HOW MANY MORE DISASTERS CAN PHARMERS INFLICT ON THIS COUNTRY WITHOUT STAMPEDING THE LIVESTOCK?

HOW MANY MORE DISASTERS ARE PHARMERS GOING TO BE ALLOWED TO CAUSE BEFORE THE LIVESTOCK START DISCUSSING THE VIABILITY OF LIVESTOCK PHARMING?

EVERY TIME THERE’S A DISASTER, THE MEDIA RALLIES AROUND THE COUNTRY’S PHARMERS MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO CRITICIZE WHAT THESE BIOTERRORISTS ARE DOING.

CONTINUALLY FUNDING PHARMERS TO PRODUCE DISEASE RIDDLED PRODUCTS IS NOT WAY TO RUN A MODERN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRY.

The following is a quote from tf17, “These days it’s deemed reasonable to give rural areas huge sums of money whereas giving similar quantities of money to council estates is regarded as an example of an old labour vice. If anything council estates these days are even worse off than they were before because billions of pounds are being siphoned out of these communities by the national lottery which has been taken over by a bunch of elitist prats who have used people’s money to finance their favourite landmark projects in the arts, media, and heritage. Blair’s publicity tour of rural voters is all too indicative that the labour party has switched the basis of its support from urban to rural areas.”

As was noted in tf17, february 6th 1998, the department of health’s policy over bse-cjd in blood donations was to refuse to tell blood donors whether their blood contained bse-cjd. The doh’s refusal had nothing to do with a concern for people’s health but with a concern that the corpses might start waving their shrouds in protest at the department’s total failure to prevent the spread of the disease. They might even have started taking retaliatory action against the pharmers responsible for spreading the disease. It was only pressure from scientists that forced the government to take measures to prevent the spread of bse-cjd through ooman blood - see tf17 february 27th 1998.

For generations the medical profession had been lying and deceiving people on a massive scale. Many of the thefts were carried out by pathologists during post-mortem examinations but surgeons were also involved. What added to the distress felt by the relatives of the victims of the medical authority’s criminal activities was that many of the organs that had been stolen had been left unused in vast organ collections whilst some of those that had been used had been disposed of as industrial rubbish. The medical profession had even been selling stolen organs to pharmaceutical companies. The media, of course, scapegoated one doctor (who not surprisingly was a johnny foreigner) but the practice of stealing organs was commonplace in many hospitals around the country. Ironically, the more prestigious the doctors and hospitals, the more likely they were to have been involved in this massive theft and deception, “A total of 4,400 organs - all brains - are kept by the oxford radcliffe hospitals trust. They are stored at the radcliffe infirmary, which is nationally renowned for neuro-science, and used for teaching or research into brain injuries, schizophrenia or new variant cjd. They were removed at the john radcliffe hospital during post-mortem examinations ordered by the coroner or carried out with relatives’ consent to determine the cause of death. Oxford University medical school has 1,000 organs - the fifth highest among the country’s medical schools. But mr highton said this collection had not been added to since 1982, and most of the organs were removed during surgery rather than during post-mortem examinations.” [25]

The medical practice of stealing organs was known about by virtually the entire profession because so many people were involved in aiding and abetting these criminal activities. Nurses had to help extract organs from patients; technicians had to look after the organ collections; administrators had to provide the finance for the upkeep of these collections; and researchers who used the organs. In other words, many participated in, or benefited from, this practice and the whole of the medical profession has kept this terrible secret for centuries.

Whilst in brutland the medical profession has enjoyed decades of high public esteem, around the world it has come to be seen as a laughing stock, “The beef-eaters, myself included, have been saved by our resistance - not by the government scientists, the government vets, and the Department of Health, whose advice has been as dangerously bad about BSE and CJD as it was over HIV, haemophilia and hepatitis C. In a less dramatic way, their tardiness in supporting adequate screening for high blood pressure, breast cancer, cervical cancer and prostatic cancer has made these aspects of British medicine the object of the world’s derision.” [30]

Ironically, having done next to nothing to stop the spread of bse, the medical profession is now trying to justify organ thefts in terms of understanding or curing the disease, “One who begged for the donations to continue said the killer disease vcjd would never have been discovered had it not been for research using tissue donated with the consent of relatives.” [31]