The junkers also milk the live-stock. With quadrapeds this is a technological process i.e. the milking parlour, but with bipeds it’s a political process - pharmers obtaining gargantuan subsidizies. Pharmers currently receive a huge quantity and range of subsidies. They are subsidized for doing some things (e.g. producing more cadavers); for not doing other things (e.g. cutting down Woods and Hedges); for doing nothing voluntarily (e.g. set aside); for doing nothing compulsorily (e.g. consequential compensation); subsidies for the devaluation of their subsidies; for repairing the damage caused by the subsidies given to the pharming industry; and, increasingly, subsidies for anything that pharmers might dream up (e.g. becoming custodians of the deserts they’ve created). The latest subsidy, consequential compensation, is money provided for pharmers who are forced to stay on their land and do nothing because of a disease which pharmers have spread as a result of their criminal activities and which the pharming industry insists can be eradicated only by preventing the movement of any Animal. In other words, they are demanding compensation for a compensation given to them by the pharmers dominating the house of commons.[132] This is truly remarkable. Some pharmers are even seeking compensation for all the time they spend applying for subsidy/compensation payouts and tax concessions. It has been estimated that half of the lorries on the country’s roads are ferrying compensation from the maffia to pharms around the country - the other half being illegal sheep movements to obtain extra subsidies from the ec - and weren’t we supposed to be the only country in the ec who abided by the law? The fuel tax protest in september 2000 was actually used as a cover for the mass transportation of Sheep around the country on bed and breakfast excursions.

Keeping bipeds in close proximity to quadrapeds has meant that bipeds have acquired the same diseases as quadrapeds. The same drugs are administered to all live-stock. Many brutish junkers believe the recycling of Animal protein, which has now been partially abandoned, was fatally flawed - it would have been far more efficient if deceased bipeds had been fed to quadrapeds before being fed back to the bipeds. Some quadrapeds are far more valuable than most bipeds. During the bse slaughter the tory live-stock pharming government forked out £50,000 in compensation to one junker for the slaughter of his prize heifer whilst a few years later the labour live-stock government gave a mere £1 million to the families of 85 deceased victims of bse-cjd.

The "english disease" used to refer to lazy, strike-happy, members of the working classes. Then it referred to the uncivilized behaviour of hundreds of thousand of brutish yobs who used to travel abroad to football matches and seaside resorts. But now we know the english disease is truly the product of the corrupt carcass of the brutish political system in which the landowning aristocracy have a veto over all political policies and thus locks the country into a barbaric medieval primitivism where for example bloodsports are protected against the wishes of the vast majority of people in this country. Football hooligans, bse, bse-cjd, ‘care in the community’, the aristocratic veto over democracy, public schoolboy fagging, paedophilia, bloodsports - these are just some of the most prominent products produced by brutland’s corrupt landowning aristocracy.[133]

What makes this situation much more dire than the above list suggests is that in the mind of the politically conventional the straightforward statement "There is no evidence that .." actually means that they refuse to accept any evidence they don’t like. Throughout the bse epidemic, the politically conventional’s incantation that ‘there is no evidence that bse will infect oomans’ was a coded phrase for ‘we’re not going to accept any evidence concerning the threats posed by bse’.

What is happening here is straightforward. The greater the threats to the environment, the more vehemently the politically conventional deny these threats.[139]

Indeed, and there is no link between the brutish honours system and political donations to political parties.

Hamilton had been condemned by his peers in the house of commons in a report on sleaze but he believed that he could clear his name through a libel trial which would have a friendly judge and which wouldn’t involve a criminal conviction if he lost. The verdict reached by the jury was surprising. Everything seemed to be going so well for hamilton. In his summing up of the trial, the judge seemed to wag the finger of guilt at fayed, "Mr justice morland said, "You may think that mr al fayed’s appreciation of what is fact and what is fiction is warped. Therefore i strongly advice you that it would be very dangerous to accept even those parts of mr al fayed’s evidence you find credible."[142] He cast serious aspersions on one of the witnesses who’d stated that they had handed cash to hamilton in one of those famous brown envelopes; and concluded by almost telling the jury to support hamilton’s version of the events, "Former tory mp neil hamilton should not get more than £150,000 damages if he wins his "cash for questions" libel case, the judge suggested to the jury yesterday."[143] It is shocking the way that rural, tory judges in this country do their best to protect the interests of their fellow tories.

So great was the expectation that hamilton would win that fayed wasn’t even in court when the jury’s decision was read out. The decision was a shock to everyone. However, hamilton’s defeat didn’t mean he was going to use the occasion to finally confess his guilt. On the contrary, totally unwilling to face up to the facts, he continued protesting his innocence, "Outside the court mr hamilton defiantly declared, "I continue to deny that I acted corruptly. I would never have embarked on this action had I been guilty of the charges against me. I do not regret bringing the case because I could not have gone through life without straining every sinew to do everything possible to bring out the truth.""[144] The guardian had already exposed one tory liar, jonathon aitken, who fought a libel action against the paper by promising to "cut out the cancer of bent and twisted journalism in our country with the simple sword of truth and the trusty shield of brutish fair play." Now it exposed another. It’s front page headline was that hamilton is, "A greedy, corrupt liar."[145] Edwina curry stated on channel four news, "At the time he was doing it (stuffing his pockets with cash) he was boastful, proud and arrogant about it."[146]

It’s bad enough that tories lie incessantly but what is worse is that they do it so spectacularly and perversely in complete defiance of the truth. The sheer, utter gall of aitken, hamilton, and archer, is striking and is clearly not merely an individualistic trait. Their defiance of facts, their belief that it is possible to lie and get away with it, with the added bonus of forcing other people to pay the price for exposing the truth, is a trait that all tory politicians acquired during the bse crisis. The gall of tory, and now labour, politicians in continuing to uphold the nonsense that Cattle and Sheep are free from bse, despite all the evidence to the contrary, is staggering. People like aitken, hamilton, and archer, aren’t basically any different from the rest of the pharmer-loving, shit currently inhabiting the house of commons and the house of lords.

To give but a couple of examples of this grandiose, delusional thinking which is commonplace in the commons and other public bars: Michael Heseltine once stated, "This report places Britain at the head of international environmental work."[147] John MacGregor stated that brutish food was "among the best and safest in the world."[148]

The question needs to be asked that if brutland is the greatest country in the world, and has such great scientists, how is it that over the last forty years there have been two major outbreaks of foot and mouth disease in brutland and yet .. "Mexico has (not) had an outbreak since the 1950's."[149]

At one and the same time they are hard nosed empiricists who deny any hypothesis that is not supported by comprehensive scientific evidence and yet they are also vehement believers in realities about which not only is there no scientific evidence, but about which there can never be any evidence.

In the 1979 general election the tories campaigned on the slogan ‘Labour isn’t working’ and when they got into government they didn’t see the slightest harm in throwing millions of people out of work. This generated a huge crime wave to which the tories responded by increasing police repression and building more and more prisons. This is in stark contrast to the japanese who insist on maintaining full employment through difficult economic times. Even though this means less profit, it also means very little crime and no huge prison building programme. Then there was the barbaric way in which the brutish government treated gulf war soldiers suffering from gulf war syndrome; the incessant lies about the bse; the treatment of haemophiliacs infected by cjd as a result of contaminated blood; the way in which the policy of ‘care in the community’ threw thousands of mentally disturbed people onto the streets resulting in the deaths of hundreds of innocent bystanders; the prosecution of the drugs war in which certain substances are deemed to be dangerous whilst others, in which tory mps and ministers owned shares and jobs, are deemed to be safe. It is as if brutland’s rulers came from another country. It is as if the old norman mentality of ‘conquer and slaughter’ is still rampant amongst the ruling landowning pharming aristocracy. The boarding school system breeds this tradition of elitism, arrogance, contempt, and callousness.

The politically conventional seem to be in a permanent state of hysterical nastiness. This characteristic could be found in the fascism of the 1920-30s as well as america’s mccarthyism in the 1950s. In brutland, it was on display at its most vivid in march 1996, when the tory government announced the first 10 bse-cjd victims. The response of tory mps was outright hysteria. They became so agitated it was feared they were its first victims. The politically conventional detest sentimentalism but they enjoy whipping themselves into hysterical nastiness over all sorts of issues from anti-europeanism, anti-abortion, anti-ozone depletion, anti-dope, anti-bse, anti-global burning. But it has been in america where these nasty hysterical denunciations have been so prominent, "The general atmosphere in which congress treats this issue (global burning) is one of hysteria. Climate change is like the new communism ... The most significant act of congressional subversion is the byrd-hagel resolution, passed unanimously by the senate in june 1997."[151]

The politically correct will immediately denounce such a politician and his company as being inherently racist. The fact is, however, that no such mp exists, no such website exists and no such charity event took place. It was all a complete fabrication. Or, rather, it was virtually all a complete fabrication. In fact there is a website but it’s called "Totally Jewish". It runs a dating agency for semites. It organized a charity ball for semites. The bbc programme was called ‘Dot Com and Kosher’.[152]

The reason for this experiment was to show that whilst the former version of events would have produced anger and accusations of racism, the latter would not. In brutish culture it is deemed racist to even mention the existence of jewish people in this country. In may 2001, robin cook took this politically correct myopia to its extreme when he declared that the brutish are not a race - even though they share the island with people from racial groups such as africans, asians, and semites. What cook’s statement implies is that whites in america are not a race and whites in germany are not a race. It seems as if people belonging to the white race are the only people on Earth who do not belong to a race.

In brutland, the house of commons and the media have a disproportionately high representation of jews. Both institutions are openly semitic when reporting or discussing events in the middle east. It is quite common for jewish reporters to be sent to the middle east to report on events in israel and most news stories about israel feature interviews with representatives from the israeli government but rarely the stateless palestinian people.

Politically correct jews in the brutish media promote a subtle form of semitic bigotry through a constant stream of documentaries about the second world war. Any outsider looking at the programmes appearing on mainstream brutish tv would be surprised at the high number focusing on an event which happened over 50 years ago. However, these programmes are only partly about the second world war. They are also a means for teaching the "native" live-stock about the extermination of the jews because politically correct jews believe the more they can make the natives feel guilty about this event the greater the political rewards for israel’s racist oppression of palestinians. (Whoa, a new tv series has just started on the nuremberg war crimes trials - may 2001).

Over the last couple of decades, semites in the over-industrialized world have transformed totalitarianism into ‘the jewish holocaust’ in which it appears the only people who were exterminated in the concentration camps were jews. The semites use this propaganda to silence critics of israeli’s current lebensraum against the palestinian people and its execution of people deemed enemies of the racist zionist state (which includes those who helped to rescue jews during the second world war!). The reasoning behind this strategy is that the more guilt they can induce in brutish people over the jewish holocaust, the less willing the natives are to denounce the war crimes being committed by the israeli state - particularly by that mass murderer ariel sharon.

The brutish landowning pharming elite tolerate zionist propaganda because media programmes about concentration camps during the second world war help to cover up the vast network of concentration camps they have erected in brutland and around the world. Most jews themselves believe that concentration camps were abolished at the end of the second world war - except for those camps being used to promote the circus of the jewish holocaust. Even members of the jewish owned ecologist magazine are blind to modern day concentration camps, in which billions are being slaughtered. Even worse, they demand the construction of more concentration and extermination camps (which they call abattoirs) to cut down the costs of the extermination process. Isn’t this just what so many nazis said during the war?

The politically correct’s racism over the jewish issue is blatantly apparent when comparing apartheid in south africa to israel’s racist oppression of palestinians in israeli-occupied palestine i.e. people whom the israeli army has not yet been able to forcibly deport. If the south african government had taken similar actions against blacks as the israeli government is currently taking against palestinians then the politically correct in brutland would have instigated huge street protests, invasions of the south african embassy, and peter hain would have been running around orchestrating campaigns of civil disobedience. But when the israeli government forces palestinians to live in ghettos/bantustans and then starts bombing and bulldozing their homes in a deliberate attempt to force them out of their own country what is the response of the politically correct? Silence. This is the hypocrisy of white political correctness which is being manipulated by politically correct jews.

Politically correct whites/jews also denounce most brutish institutions as being "institutionally racist" and yet neither say anything about the racism of what is arguably the most important institution in brutland - the hollywood film industry. Hollywood is virtually a closed shop for jews. It is just as institutionally racist as the brutish police force and the prison service. What is even more pathetic about the politically correct’s silence over this issue is that many hollywood films depict english people in a very derogatory way and english actors are often employed for the nastiest roles. Right on cue. Just at the time of writing, may 2001, the american cartoon series, ‘God, the Devil and Bob’ made its debut on brutish television. Not surprisingly, the devil in the title has an english accent.

The media/advertising industries contain a higher than average number of jews and a high proportion of white females. Both of these groups have their own agenda which leads them to promote pro-black racism. As far as politically correct jews are concerned, the more that the bruts can be encouraged to live amicably with blacks the more likely they are to tolerate jews - which, of course, allows the zionists in israel to continue their racial oppression of palestinians in israeli occupied palestine. Whilst they’re all too willing to introduce afro-males they are much less willing to feature pakistanis, indians, etc because many of them have moslem backgrounds and the last thing that jews what to do is to put moslems in a favourable light because this would make it more difficult for mass murdering israeli prime ministers to slaughter unarmed palestinians without the rest of the world getting queasy.

As far as white politically correct females in the advertising world/media are concerned their promotion of black members doesn’t seem to be so politically motivated. Perhaps the give away about their motives is that a high proportion of the commercials featuring black males often involves them running around in their underpants - the latest one of which was a ‘Pot Noodle’ advert where they even managed to get the black "actor" to strip of completely.

One of the consequences of white women treating black males as sex objects has already been outlined. Another major consequence is that 95% of so called multi-cultural relationships are between white women and black males. White women/black males are creating the first asymmetric race in ooman history - the first time the females of one race and the males of another race have combined to produce offspring which obliterates their own characteristics. In the name of multi-culturalism they are producing a uniform race of brown children. Many of the women who will go out only with black men are currently demanding equality in the work-place for blacks - so that their black partners can bring in a second income.

Many white men who, for decades, have been supporting sexual and racial equality in the workplace, are now going out to nightclubs only to be confronted by women who are blacks-only racists who wouldn’t give them the time of day. The caribbeanization of brutland is resulting not only in an asymmetric race of brown children but a huge surge in single parents, the increasing spread of hiv-aids, an explosion in the numbers of hard drug users, an increase in gangland shootings, etc so that socially the country is increasingly beginning to resemble a cold caribbean country.

It was mentioned above that in brutland it is deemed to be racist to mention jews in society. It is also deemed racist to mention that the recent surge in hiv cases in brutland is due to african males. What is involved here are not crimes of rape (although the situation in south africa may be different) but, on the contrary, white women treating black males as sex objects.

The mundi club has a long and impeccable record of anti-racism. But it has to be admitted that its sympathies are increasingly shifting to white males. Over the last couple of decades they’ve been ridiculed by the jewish dominated hollywood film industry who employ them in the worst nigger type roles. For the last four years they’ve been condemned for supporting institutional racism in the workplace. And increasingly they are now being ignored by white women. Quite why such men should want to support racial equality and give up their whites-only jobs for blacks when hollywood is clearly disinterested in racial equality and when they could find themselves spending the rest of their lives without a partner or a family is becoming increasingly questionable.

Firstly, a bbc2 ‘newsnight’ article on the resurgence of hiv cases in brutland. The first part of the article consisted of an explanation about a new strain of the hiv virus which is resistant to the current cocktail of drugs and which has infected 25% of hiv sufferers.[155] From the political point of view, what was interesting about the article was that it dealt with the resurgence of the disease as if it was still affecting the same types of people as before i.e. the gay community. Watching the programme was like suddenly being transported back in time to the early 1980s.

The second part of the article consisted of a panel discussion conducted by jeremy vine. There were three people on the panel: one was the conservative minister who, in the early 1980s, organized the first anti-aids publicity campaign; another was a health professional; and the third was an hiv activist from the gay community. The health official mentioned that the government has been planning a new campaign to warn people about the upsurge of hiv cases. The other two panellists scoffed that the campaign has been in preparation for the last four years but has still not yet been launched. The former minister said that he understood there are "sensitivities" about the campaign which made its launch difficult and the other two panellists nodded in agreement. Strangely, however, jeremy vine resisted the temptation to ask them what these "sensitivities" were.

The panel discussion finished off with the former minister stating that he suspected that the health department wanted to launch the new hiv campaign but that other government departments were holding it back because of these political sensitivities - once again no mention of what these are. Once again, the other panellist gave a slight smirk to indicate his agreement but it also seemed to express frustration that he had had to participate in this discussion and toe the line by not mentioning these ‘sensitivities’. Clearly newsnight had warned them off discussing these sensitivities and this was probably because it had not been given the go-ahead by the government to expose the truth behind the current spread of hiv so it had to pretend that social conditions haven’t changed since the early 1980s. If anyone wants a clear example of the extent to which governments shape the political content of news programmes this would be one of them. Everyone on the panel, including jermey vine, knew what the unmentionable sensitivity is but, because of government pressure, did not discuss it.[156] As a consequence of this silence more people are contracting the disease.

The second example was the bbc documentary about jews running a web site which has been mentioned above. In the mirror’s tv notes on the programme it was stated that the programme is about young jewish people who are leaving behind their jewish roots as they make their way in english society, "Sue perkins narrates an observational documentary exploring the lives of five young jewish web journalists over the course of a week, as they struggle with the tensions between the culture they thrive in and the age old religion they have largely left behind."[157] What the programme was actually about was young jewish people who were determined they wouldn’t become assimilated into english society. Indeed the website they’d created was all too indicative of this stance 'Totally Jewish'.

There were many things of interest about this programme. Firstly, it is about jews. This is not unusual. What would be unusual would be programmes about asians or palestinians. Secondly, that the programme notes had emphasized something that was complimentary to english society whilst the programme was about the exact opposite. So, somewhere along the line, somebody in the bbc/mirror felt there was the need to change the publicity for the programme. Finally, why is it that if the programme had been about wasps it would have provoked outrage and yet, because it was about jews, it was perfectly acceptable? Entirely by coincidence of course, that same evening channel four was broadcasting a programme about ... yes you’ve guessed it, the second world war, "Science and the Swastika’.

The brutish green movement’s vested interests in the Animal slavery industry leads it to blame the fossil fuel industry for provoking the greenhouse effect. Greens’ believe in the scientifically ludicrous fantasy that global burning is caused solely by the release of greenhouse gas emissions and that these greenhouse gas emissions come overwhelmingly from the fossil fuel industry. Greens desperately try to protect their vested interests by covering up or denying the contribution made by the Animal enslavement industry to global burning. They deny that the global pharming industry’s destruction of the Earth’s Forests has any influence on global burning and that its contribution to the release of greenhouse gases is minimal.

Greens support for the Animal enslavement industry also means they believe the only way to combat global burning is through reducing greenhouse emissions from fossil fuels rather than extracting Carbon out of the atmosphere through Reforestation. Not only are they disinterested in Reforestation as a means for combating global burning they are opposed to it because of the threat it poses to the expansion of their industry. If organic pharming i.e. the extensive Animal slavery industry, is to replace the intensive Animal slavery industry then it will need all the land it can get for pastureland which leaves no room for Reforestation. What this means is that, politically, greens are incapable of even proposing, let alone implementing, the policies needed to combat global burning. Indeed, they are likely to exacerbate global burning once they try and implement organic pharming around the world.

The global pharming industry makes a bigger contribution to global burning than any other industry. Unless this industry is abolished there is no way of carrying out Reforestation and combating global burning. Recycling, the conservation of resources, energy conservation, energy efficiency, pollution reduction, catalytic converters, green cars, green refrigerators, biodegradable plastics, etc, etc, are all green gimmicks which are incapable of making a substantial contribution to combating global burning. It is true that these elements of green politics are a necessary part of a sustainable planet but they are not urgent, essential, or significant, policies for combating global burning. By far and away the single most important means for combating global burning is the abolition of the Animal slavery industry and conversion of pastureland to Reforestation. Without the abolition of the Animal exploitation industry and the abolition of land inequalities, then people might as well forget about global burning and enjoy what time oomans have left on Earth. At best green politics is irrelevant, a waste of time. At worst it is a front for the world’s biggest Earth wreckers and the world’s biggest contributors to global burning.

Over the last ten years greens have played virtually no role in helping people to understand the role of Photosynthesizers in the stabilization of the Earth’s climate and the role of Forests in the Earth’s climate. This is not merely a failure of green politics but a tragedy. Despite years criticizing greens for their opposition to Reforestation it is still difficult believing this is the case. But the fact remains that virtually all the major green organizations from greenpeace to foes of the Earth, from ‘new scientist’; ‘tiempo’; ‘the Cornerhouse’; to the ‘ecologist’, etc, "scorn" Reforestation. The only people on the planet who supposedly love Trees and Forests, are the most vigorous opponents of Reforestation. This is a betrayal of green politics, a betrayal of life on Earth, and, ultimately, it could be a betrayal of the Earth itself. To be more specific, green politics and the Earth are being sabotaged by green, organic pharmers. Since the second world war most of the damage to the Earth has been done by the industrialized Animal enslavement industry but if greens ever managed to replace the intensive, Animal slavery industry then organic, free range pharming would finish off the Earth’s life support system. The Animal enslavement industry is killing the Earth and green organic pharmers will strike the fatal blow.

In conclusion, the organic pharming industry is the smiling face of the conventional Animal terrorism industry. The country’s leading greens are renegade members of the landowning pharming elite who want to reform the intensive Animal slavery industry not abolish it. They want to reform their own class not do away with it or the land inequalities it perpetuates. The transformation of society from intensive factory pharming to organic pharming will be so bland it wouldn’t even lead to the abolition of Fox hunting. Green politics is just a variation on conventional live-stock politics.

These are the values and attitudes of politically conventional/correct, live-stock. They have abandoned reason, fairness, or justice. The belief that oomans are rational and reasonable creatures has never been more ludicrous. It is becoming more and more laughable as oomans stumble from disaster to disaster. They can’t remember the last disaster; they’re oblivious of the trend of disasters; they deny the causes of disasters; they are devoted to the perpetrators of disasters; and they dismiss the remedies for these disasters. The live-stock are rational black-holes. What other species on Earth is stupid enough to drive itself into oblivion whilst grazing in lush monocultural pastures denying it is doing anything wrong or that anything is going wrong or that anything could go wrong?

There has never been a time when the world’s scientists have understood as much about the Earth’s climate as they do at present whilst the vast mass of oomans on Earth are oblivious to even the basic facts about the climate and aren’t in the slightest bit interested in how the Earth works. The sheer scale of the decadent, degenerate, self indulgence of hundreds of millions of consumers in the over-industrialized world is surely one of the most revoltingly ugly spectacles ever witnessed on such a beautiful planet. Sure, once the eco-nazis have gone, there ought to be sadness at the loss of some incredible ooman culture but, overall it’s not enough to match the wonders and beauty of a four billion year old living system and a complex abundance of Biodiversity. Oomans will eventually prove themselves to be eco-nazis. The sooner they recognize this, the better their chances of surviving. But they won’t recognize before it too late - perhaps not even after its too late. The sooner these ridiculous, arrogant, vulgar, strutting eco-nazi morons have gone the better for Wildlife and the Earth. Wildlife have a greater Earth value than oomans. The Earth can survive without oomans but it can’t survive with them. The Earth is more important than oomans. It isn’t Wildlife who have got to pay their way in order to survive and it isn’t the Earth that’s got to pay its way. It’s oomans. oomans’ epitaph is: they thought they were more important than Wildlife and more important than the Earth.