Inter Racist Relationships.

This article explores some of the emerging features of a multi-cultural society. It is to be hoped the stephen lawrence enquiry will result in better treatment for blacks[1] and that this, in turn, will allow whites to express criticisms, without being labelled as racist, of some of the appallingly self indulgent behaviour engaged in by some blacks. But this work is only partly about what some blacks are doing (and also not doing). It is much more concerned with the degeneracy of feminism and, in particular, some of its racist elements.

Liberated Woe-men.

Fading Racial Tensions.

Throughout the 1990s racial tensions in brutland seem to have been fading rapidly.[2] The appalling murder of stephen lawrence was evidence not of endemic, and deteriorating, racism but the last vestiges of nationalistic culture metamorphosing into multi-culturalism.[3] The bombing outbreak in april 1999 was greeted with disbelief by most sections of society that such vestiges still remained. On the level of everyday observations, especially if you live in a large urban area, black and white youngsters seem to mix easily and mixed couples are becoming more and more commonplace. These everyday observations seem to be borne out in the statistics, “Latest figures show that one in 20 children under five are of mixed race ...”[4] And, during the enquiry into the police handling of the lawrence murder, there’s hardly been a television advertisement, play or news scene plucked from normal life which doesn’t feature mixed couples. Tv adverts in particular seem to have cast aside their usual cautious use of imagery for fear of offending prospective customers and have taken on a political role in emphasizing multi-culturalism - although, revealingly, their predilection seems to focus on beefy, steroid sized, black men rather than encompassing all the nationalities living in this country.[5] The reason that inter-racial relationships are becoming so frequent is because of the marked decline in social antagonisms toward such relationships.

The Triumph of Progress?

For progressive lefties this development must be yet another reason for celebrating the marvels of the ooman spirit and the triumph of rationality over prejudice. They doubtlessly derive satisfaction in finding further confirmation of their belief in ooman Progress. But, any commentator looking impartially at these considerable social changes might also suspect that something anomalous is going on. As regards mixed relationships, black male/white female relationships far outnumber white male/black female relationships. From personal observation it seems to be in the region of 20 to 1.[6] So what’s going on? What’s the cause of this stark difference?

A number of questions spring to mind. Are black men discriminating in favour of white women? Are white women discriminating in favour of black men? More sociologically, are black men more liberated than black women who still feel unsure of themselves in a ‘white’ society? Is it that black women still prefer the companionship of black males? Is it that white women, having been liberated by the pill and a career, now feel free to choose whatever partner takes their fancy? Are there still residual reservations, but this time in the form of political correctness, against white male/black female relationships because they smack of imperialist exploitation whereas no such connotations attach themselves to relationships between black men/white women?

It might be suggested that inter-racial relationships are just an accident; the result of different races living in the same vicinity or visiting the same places and meeting as a result of chance encounters. But this doesn’t explain the imbalance in the number of relationships between white women and black men and the number of relationships between black women and white men. Then again, perhaps this is just a social anomaly, a temporary phenomena which will eventually even out over time.

There is anecdotal evidence, however, which suggests this anomaly is neither accidental nor temporary. Firstly, a high proportion of the white women going out with black males are blondes - suggesting an affinity between black men and, as the black man’s lyrics have it, ‘sexy cinderella’. It’s also becoming noticeable that after having gone out with one black man, white women seem to prefer going out with other black men.[7] If the first relationship was sheer accident, the second and subsequent relationships seems far less so. Some white women now feel sufficiently free of traditional social restraints to come right out with it and say they’ll only go out with black men. This attitude is transparently racist. These relationships are more accurately defined as inter-racist relationships. What adds to the evidence of this newly emerging bigotry is that some, non-blonde, white women with repeated black partners express antagonisms towards blonde women because they reduce their chances of pulling black males. Even further across the spectrum of racist bigotry, some of these ‘blacks-only racists’ (bores) are turning their resentment towards black men because they don’t seem to take so much interest in non-blonde, white women. So, if new prejudices are replacing old ones is any social progress actually being made?

Are White Women the Leaders of a new Political Revolution?

One of the interesting questions about these social changes is whether female bores see themselves as social revolutionaries fighting the cause of racial harmony through the physical integration of the races - having sex and multi-cultural children? “The 1990s are finally seeing all the radical changes that women have been fighting for since the first suffragette chained herself to the railings.”[8] Is this the first political act of a newly liberated section of society? It’s doubtful. The most common type of woman going out with black men seems to be blonde bimbos without the slightest interest in politics, who don’t seem to care about anything past their bleached hair, high heels, and painted fingernails. It is frankly beyond reason to believe that blondes are leading a new political movement. Are we seriously to believe the most politically retarded members of society have suddenly taken their responsibilities in life seriously enough to create a better world in which to live?[9]

Comparing Blacks with Jews.

When looking at the role of blacks in society it is revealing to compare them with another minority, jews. Even the most assimilated jews are interested in their long tradition, their eventful and tragic heritage, and many maintain contacts with their home land either directly through relations or through organizations lobbying on behalf of their homeland. Many jews can be relied on to help the homeland in cases of emergency - whether financially, culturally or ideologically. The case of robert maxwell is unique but it does contain illustrative features. Here was a man who was given refuge from the nazis and built a fortune in his newly adopted country. He insisted he was doing no end of good for the “natives” as he liked to call them and his newly adopted country.[10] When iraq invaded kuwait he used his newspaper to whip up support in brutland for the war on the pretext of restoring democracy and protecting our vital oil interests. In reality, kuwait never has been a democracy and the world’s oil supply was so abundant that even if kuwait’s oil was turned off it would have had little effect on oil prices. The gulf war was primarily fought to protect israel - to prevent it from launching a war against iraq which would have sucked in the rest of the islamic world. British troops were killed during this war. After maxwell committed suicide it was discovered that he’d been ripping off the natives’ pension funds and funnelling money into israel. Despite this his body was flown to israel where he was given an honourable burial and was laid to rest in a prestigious burial site for israeli heroes.

Blacks seem to be entirely different. Many seem to have little interest in their heritage, traditions or homeland. Talking to some blacks it is as if they’ve popped out of nowhere. There are no black organizations in this country helping blacks around the world; there are no black organizations channelling funds into projects to help blacks overcome poverty (with the exception of comic relief which is more of a national affair); and there are no black organizations taking on a lobbying role to combat the west’s appalling political chicanery in africa. There is a noticeable contrast between the proliferation of global organizations promoting jewish interests and the absence of such organizations promoting the interests of blacks.

It has to be said that some blacks seem so ignorant of politics they don’t even know the arguments necessary to promote africa’s best interests.[11] What is demoralizing about this situation is that there are plenty of white pc males sacrificing their time promoting third world politics whilst their black counterparts seem more interested in running around after blonde bimbos.

The Pastoralism of Black Males.

It is difficult characterizing black men - as, of course, it is difficult characterizing men from any culture. But if there is such a thing as multi-culturalism then this implies there are different cultures - even if these cultural differences are breaking down they are still there at the moment.

It has been stated that in africa, sexism is rife .. “most developing world cultures are incalculably more sexist than western society.”[12] And we’re not talking here about men who open doors for women. In some african countries it’s quite common for black males to send their women out to work whilst they sit at home playing cards or drinking in the local saloon, “In many village cultures of africa and the subcontinent women do the field work, the water hauling, the wood gathering. While mothers work in the sun, the men sit in the shade drinking tea, waiting to seize whatever the women produce.”[13] This form of exploitation, which is quite different from, and far worse than, mere male chauvinism, seems to have evolved from africa’s long tradition of tribalism where groups of people wander from area to area grazing off the land until it is exhausted and then moving on to greener pastures. In other parts of africa, black males graze off other men rather than just their women folk, “Some 300,000 masai now live in kenya, and their population is swelling at nearly the national rate of 4% a year. More significant, as far as the wildlife is concerned, is the growing number of masai who are abandoning pastoralism for farming. Masai (in mara) generally lease their land to non-masai farmers rather than cultivating it themselves.”[14] The grazing attitude amongst black males seems to have persisted over time - from the traditional form of pastoralism; the exploitation of women and in more recent times, the modern forms of capitalism.[15]

Grazing also seems a feature of contemporary social relationships. Many black men seem highly promiscuous.[16] Perhaps the most notorious example of this are the blacks in the american national basketball association, “Almost every single player in the nba, america’s premier basketball league, has fathered a child out of wedlock - with the most wayward siring a many as seven with six different women .. according to sports illustrated magazine. Since about 85% of the nba’s players are black, the report, entitled ‘Where’s daddy?’ .. Observers of the nba say that the numbers of illegitimate offspring are staggering. One of the league’s top agents said, “I’d say that there might be more kids out of wedlock than there are players in the nba.”[17] The nba decadence seems to symbolize the grazing attitudes of many black males, “More than 70% of all black children in this country (u.s.) are illegitimate compared with 21% of all whites.”[18]

In this country, perhaps the most well known exponent of this black indifference to monogamy is les ferdinand who, when asked about his wife during his affair with a blonde bimbo said, “Just because a woman has your baby doesn’t mean you’ve got to stick with her.” This sort of attitude comes straight off the savannah grasslands. His wife was reported to be sticking with him. To put it colloquially, many black men are tarts.[19]

Over the last couple of months two of the most prominent multi-cultural marriages which seemed to symbolize the integration of the races, have disintegrated because both of the black males have been responding to the calls of the wild. In the sporting world, sharron davies’s marriage to derek redmond was portrayed as a shining example of racial harmony. The relationship seems to have folded after redmond went off on a grazing spree. After he was booted out of the house, “Ex-olympic runner derek, 33, said the affair was “a terribly silly mistake - is something i regret enormously.”[20] The regret didn’t seem to last that long. It was reported that davies .. “was still furious about his cheating - but she thought that in time she could forgive him. She knew it would be a long haul but believed they could still make a go of their five year marriage for the sake of themselves and the children. (But derek redmond told her), “We’re finished.” And he confessed that he had a string of one night stands during their marriage. He also admitted that one illicit relationship last year lasted several months. A friend said: “Derek has cheated on her several times. Most of them were just flings. Now derek has tasted what it is like to be young, single and free again. He loves it and doesn’t want to know (her).”[21] That’s quite a good way to finish off an affair - admitting all the cheating you’ve been doing since you were married.

In the media world dawn french’s marriage to lenny henry was also taken to symbolize the integration of the races. But in early may the relationship began to unravel, “They always prided themselves on having one of the strongest marriages in show business. But last night funny girl dawn french was coming to terms with the fact that husband lenny henry had been caught out with a blonde hotel receptionist. The star had spent a champagne night with australian born merri cheyne in a posh hotel suite.”[22] Despite the considerable suffering this must have inflicted on his wife, a few weeks later he made things even worse by taking up with a couple of lap-dancers, “Telly comic lenny henry is exposed today as a love rat (sic) who pesters lapdancers for sex.[23]

The Kinky Chemistry of Black Men and Blonde Bimbos.

Nobody but the most bigoted, politically correct, leftie would try and deny that there seems to be a sexual chemistry between black men and white women. Porno magazines, not keen to ignore social trends if it means a profit, seem full of the stuff. Let’s give a couple of examples of this chemistry. Eastenders star louise jameson had a child by black actor leroy alexander. She says about this relationship, “Leroy was seven years younger than me, but it had been an instant and intense physical attraction. I tried to avoid him at first, but it was no good.”[24] One of the most publicized cases in recent years was lyn davies (a welsh blonde) who went on holiday to africa and promptly got engaged, and subsequently married, a masai warrior trinket seller.[25] She recalls the first time they met, “Jacob held out his hand to mine and there was such a massive chemical charge between us.”[26] A more recent example happened on esther rantzen’s chat show.[27] The topic was sex appeal. She introduced a woman she was about to interview by saying that she’d been walking down the street when she saw this beautiful man and had run over to him and flung her arms around him. It has to be asked just how frequent is this sort of behaviour? So what are we talking about here? Well of course it shouldn’t be too difficult to guess: a blonde and a black man.

Jameson’s affair is not the issue. People who fall instantly love usually want to spend their lives together and eventually have offspring. What is the issue is that although this affair didn’t lead to a permanent relationship, it did result in a sprog. They couldn’t wait to decide whether their ‘instant attraction’ was going to be permanent before having a sprog which, it shouldn’t be forgotten, has the right to be brought up by two loving parents who share the burdens of child rearing. Alexander .. “left her after six months to join the hari krishna religious cult.”[28] A clear case of exploiting local resources before seeking pastures new. One wonders just how much of a role he’s played in the child’s life and how much he’s done to support it - although skipping off to join the hari krishnas doesn’t suggest someone who takes his responsibilities in life too seriously.[29]

So what’s the cause of this attraction of opposites? Is it magnetic personalities; mutual cultural values; contrasting cultural values; a commonality of class? It could be argued, however, it can’t be any of these factors because all of them apply just as much to white males and black women. None of these factors could produce the lopsided number of white women/black men relationships.

It’s an often observed phenomena that social prohibitions intensify illicit relationships. The stricter the prohibitions, the kinkier the relationship, the closer the rebellious lovers become bound together. Whilst it is true that racist barriers are disappearing so that white women face fewer and fewer restrictions to having relationships with black men, there are still residual prejudices regarding mixed relationships that generate an element of kinkiness. The implication of this phenomena is that blondes and blacks must be attracted to each other because of this social kinkiness. However, once again, this factor affects all inter-racial relationships so it can’t be the one which generates the predominance of black male/white female relationships. It might help to keep these relationships together but it doesn’t explain what brought these relationships about. Given the politically correct disapproval of relationships between white males and black women then the implication of this hypothesis is that there should be a higher proportion of black female/white male relationships as opposed to black male/white female.

From everyday observation there are increasing examples of white women’s lust for black men. It isn’t unusual these days to see groups of white women eyeing up black men. What is so amusing about this is that these women are acting in very much the same way as many men do towards women. Men have for a long time been denounced by women for pestering or ‘sniffing’ around women, so it’s quite amusing seeing white women now engaging in this same sort of conduct.

Many women detest men, in varying degrees of intensity, who are attracted to tarts. This detestation increases with age and becomes more and more obsessive. They fear their husband will run off with the secretary or the barmaid. Socially, this syndrome has been the subject of smutty jokes, gossip and titillation. For decades ‘the married man and his secretary/dolly bird’ syndrome has pushed women into spates of fear, accusations, and recriminations against their partners which has soured, and even ruined, their relationships. It’s one of the clichés of modern life which can spark considerable friction between partners. But now that women have suddenly discovered black tarts it will be all too enjoyable watching to see how much resistance they put up and how much they’ll enjoy accusations about their intentions.

Trendy Blacks.

In the late 1990s it’s obvious that increasing numbers of white women regard going out with black males as being trendy - as if trendiness is an acceptable criteria for choosing a new partner, let alone being a solid basis for a lasting and mutually fulfilling relationship. Even worse is that women increasingly regard black men as sex objects - even women who frequently denounce men for treating women as sex objects can’t seem to see anything wrong with regarding black men in this way. But black men, unlike many white women, seem to enjoy the acclaim. There have always been romeos, don juans, casanovas, etc but, as this list suggests, they have always been unusual individuals from a variety of cultures. What we see with black men is almost a cultural trait. Many black men give a good impression of belonging to a race of sexual pastoralists.

What is surprising about multi-culturalism over the last few years, especially during the explosion of multi-culturalism triggered off by the lawrence enquiry, is not the masses of white people who welcome other nationalities and enjoy the benefits of cultural diversity but the intense acclamation given to black men as opposed to black women or those from other cultures. The number of glossy, good looking, muscle bound, black males in tv adverts is far out of proportion to their numbers in a multi-cultural society.[30] There are many anglo-chinese, anglo-japanese, anglo-philippine, anglo-indian, anglo-pakistani, relationships in this country but how many chinese, japanese, philippine, indian or pakistani males played the lead role in tv commercials’ multi-cultural outburst during the first half of 1999? The impression which this creates isn’t so much that it now seems as if half the male population of brutland has suddenly become black, but that television screens suddenly seem to have become a vehicle for the lurid fantasies of newly liberated white women. In tv-land we have now gone far beyond the ‘token black’ to ‘compulsory glam blacks’.

A Jewish Lesson for White People?

There are no figures about who produces the tv commercials extolling black male/white female relationships. Perhaps, as suggested above, it’s white women in positions of power within the advertising world. Perhaps it’s young white males using images/ideas derived from the social changes evident on the streets. If this is the case then, in terms of traditional darwinian assumptions, this is an unusual occurrence. Are young, white males so intent on racial integration that they sacrifice their own biological imperative in order to make black men fashionable to white women? This is not beyond the realms of possibility given that in politically correct circles the white male’s desire to atone for the evils of centuries of white civilization seems to border on the masochistic.[31]

There is, however, an alternative explanation. The advertising world is heavily influenced by jews.[32] It is plausible they are using the burgeoning white female/black male relationships as a means of fostering racial integration since this would help to consolidate their own positions in society - after all, if whites are willing to tolerate the obvious differences they have with blacks then they will be even more willing to tolerate jews.[33]

The Sprog Factor.

Single Parents.

Just as noticeable on the level of everyday observation as the proportion of black male/white female relationships, is the frequency with which white women can be seen pushing around mixed race sprogs without their father/s.[34] Roughly speaking, for every 95 occasions when a white mother/mixed race child might be seen on the street there are only about 5 occasions when both parents are present. Is this because mixed-race couples fear a public reaction if they go out together? Is it because many black men don’t make good fathers and have no interest in bringing up their own sprogs? Or is it because increasing numbers of women prefer to bring up children by themselves rather than enduring the hassle of sharing responsibilities with a male?

The first possibility is unlikely. The third is much more plausible; there are more and more women who want to bring up their children on their own. The second possibility is also plausible. The singer in the band ‘hot chocolate’[35] was recently discussing on the radio his fatherless childhood and he stated that single parents are the norm in the caribbean.[36] Perhaps this type of relationship works well in the caribbean but whether it does so in brutland is another matter. In brutland, absentee fathers are one of the major factors causing the vast increase in social problems such as underaged sex, underaged abortions, underaged mothers, the spread of std, school bullying, truancy, juvenile delinquency, juvenile criminality, hotting, and the increasing use of drugs by younger and younger people.

The scale of these problems necessitates questions about the degree to which males accept their parental responsibilities. Are black males taking more or less interest in their own kids in comparison to white males? How much are black males responsible for the rise in the number of single parents? Unfortunately, it’s simply not known what proportion of black males look after their kids in comparison to the proportion of white males looking after theirs - in politically correct circles any attempt to discover such information would be deemed at best irrelevant but, far more likely, as inherently racist. The results from one survey suggest that, “Half of all caribbean families are headed by a single parent. About 25% of black mothers in their thirties do not live with their partners. The comparable figure for white mums is just 10%.”[37] The only way of combating the social problems ensuing from absentee fathers is by understanding the different cultural attitudes that males have toward fatherhood. Living in a multi-cultural society means accepting different cultures and understanding that, because there are different cultural attitudes, specific responses are required to meet different cultural needs - as opposed to pretending that black males are no different from white males and applying one blanket solution to all males.

There are those lefties who argue that males’ different cultural attitudes toward parental responsibilities are irrelevant - as if what matters isn’t who’s causing the vast social problems resulting from absentee fathers but that all males should take equal responsibilities for paying for the upbringing of all children. But why should those males who don’t want kids be burdened with responsibilities for looking after other people’s kids? What is more, it can be argued that it is one thing for a white woman to have flings with black men. If white women prefer going out with blacks this is something that white males are going to have to put up with. But it’s quite another matter when these liaisons produce children who then have to be brought up without a father. This is a matter about which white males have a legitimate interest because they have to help pay for the upbringing of these children - a clear cut case of taxation necessitating representation.[38]

There are a number of general, and particular, reasons for the rise in the number of single, white mothers with mixed race children. On the general level, there is the appalling level of sex education. On the particular level, there is the contention that black males seem reluctant to use condoms. There’s also the suspicion that black children seem to mature sexually much earlier than white children. But what is also going on here is that since the introduction of the child support agency a lot of men have realized that, unlike in the past where they could have as many kids as they wanted by as many women as they could get hold of and have all those sprogs paid for by the state, having children now incurs a heavy economic burden. It is difficult to quantify how much fear that males currently feel about being burdened with the costs of unwanted children as a result of a one night stand, or a casual relationship. But this worry seems less prevalent amongst black males than it does amongst white males for the simple reason that the former have less prospects of getting a good job so the economic penalties they face are less onerous. Finally, a similar factor may also be involved amongst those girls who don’t get pregnant accidentally. There are many young girls who deliberately set out to get pregnant. - whether because they are hormonally primed or seeking independence from their parents. Is it possible that whilst white males are reluctant to meet their demands because they don’t want the expense, black males face far less deterrence?

Tony parsons provides an interesting insight into abysmal state of current social mores with a comparison between the way society looks upon an overzealous father and absentee fathers, “Father a child and then bugger off and leave it and nobody will raise an eyebrow. But stick around long enough to give your child a smack on the bum and an entire army of social workers will descend upon you.”[39] However, it would be wrong to overstate the case against absentee fathers when some commentators allege that even fathers in supposedly stable marriages spend only 15 minutes a day with their children.

The Role of New Men.

Over the last three or four decades white pc males have played a significant role in helping to liberate women. They believe that women are entitled to equality with men. They hope that providing women with access to education and jobs would give them independence, the power to make a free choice about their partner, and the confidence not to tolerate violent, manipulative, or exploitative, partners. In the past, women were so dependent on men earning a wage they had little opportunity to leave thugs, control freaks or philanderers. The pc theory concludes that the changes in women’s economic and social status would then require men to change their ways in order to win women’s trust and respect. Men would have to become more loyal, caring, decent, and supportive or else women would go elsewhere to find men who were. Men would no longer judge women by their looks and women would no longer have to worry about being judged in this way. The liberation of women was seen by many pc males as a route to better and fairer relationships which, in turn, would serve as the basis for a more oomane society.

By the late 1990s it is obvious this ‘progressive’ leftie theory has long since decomposed in the dustbin of history. Liberated women have not been gravitating to the more caring, sharing, and loyal sort of male. On the contrary, what is so surprising about these new social changes is that many independent, white women are choosing to go out with men who are chauvinists, philanderers, and even bullies. Even more surprising is why white women, in their new found freedom, are running after black men who are more likely to be chauvinistic than their white counterparts and who are even more likely to desert them than white males?[40] This is not to say, of course, that all black males are worse than all white males. Far from it. The overwhelming proportion of white males are still of the macho, football mad, beer swilling, burger scoffing, variety.[41] But, whatever the reasons for women’s choice of partner might be, it’s interesting that it isn’t the sort of bloke who helped to liberate them or who support their liberation but, on the contrary, those who’d quite like to send them out into the fields picking potatoes whilst they sit at home playing cards and smoking dope.[42]

The Usual Ooman Decadence.

The strange thing about progressive leftie bigots is that they know what’s going on here but unfortunately they won’t discuss it. They won’t accuse women of judging men by their looks and indulging in gross self-centred behaviour in case it upsets their feminist bigot counterparts. The ideology of feminist bigots holds that all men are degenerate because they focus solely on women’s physical attributes whilst women are far superior because they are more concerned about their partner’s personality and spiritual integrity (sic). Germane greer appeared on a programme about page three girlies[43] and, in her oft recited, exasperated manner, expressed her disappointment that “men are so voyeuristic”.[44] It’s well known that women totally ignore men’s attributes - only men are loathesome enough to judge members of the opposite sex by their appearance. There is even anecdotal evidence of women at parties wearing blindfolds so they can more easily appreciate the character and moral values of the blokes they are talking to without being distracted by ‘mere looks’. What is strange about greer’s attitude towards men was that the only bloke she married, someone she picked up off the street, was in her own words “endowed like a ballistic missile”. It seems that germaine was unable to resist a tad bit of voyeurism herself.

The increasing numbers of white women with black partners seems to symbolize the fact that women judge men by their looks, just as much as men judge women by theirs.[45] The consequence of women’s liberation has been that increasing numbers of women are treating men, especially black men, as sex objects.

It was pointed out above that one of the benefits of white women being free to go out with black men is that, at long last, women will have to deal with the moral conflicts generated by tarts. This might make women as a whole more sensitive to this issue and thus less aggressive toward men should the topic crop up during a domestic argument. Hopefully this might also lead women to a greater understanding of other supposedly male faults which are all too frequently beginning to appear in female behaviour thus diminishing feminist accusations against men.[46]

The Self Annihilation of Blonde Bimbos and Black Tarts.

Although the latest social revolution will persist it will, thankfully end in the annihilation of blonde bimbos and black tarts. This is a price well worth paying. Questions arise from this mutually assured genetic destruction. Do blondes have a deep seated desire for the annihilation of their physical characteristics which was not previously apparent given the way they flaunt their assets? Are black males so intent on grazing that they wander from woman to woman without any concern for their cultural past or even their cultural future as represented by their multi-cultural offspring?

In many cases the rise of mixed race children is not so much the triumph of rationality over prejudice or the glorious integration of the races as the morphing of black and white bimbos. If anyone believes this amalgamation of black and white, meat-eating, gold medallion, car-owning, a-political, self obsessed, bimbos has anything more than social significance they are sadly mistaken.

White women no longer have to endure social pressures against having long term relationships with blacks. They no longer even have to face social pressures for having fleeting affairs with blacks which result in offspring who have no father and for which society must provide. Women are now liberated and it’s time they started taking on the responsibilities of liberation. If it’s a woman’s right to choose then its a woman’s duty to pay for the consequences of her choices. It’s time for drastic political measures to follow in the wake of a feminist revolution which is unleashing widescale social chaos.

What’s the Legacy for Mixed Race Children?

The question that multi-cultural children should ask themselves when they grow up, especially where the father has been absent, is why so many of them are the product of black male/white female relationships rather than vice versa. What are their mothers going to say when they ‘re asked, ‘Mummy did you really go out with daddy just because he had a big black dick?’; ‘Was your choice of partner so concerned about sex rather than their suitability to bring up children?’; ‘Was your decision so wayward that it left me without a dad?’ What sort of heritage do they have to look forward to?

What is currently passing as the marvels of racial integration is just one lot of discrimination replacing another. The consequence of female liberation has been the liberation of even more ooman decadence. The more that oomans liberate themselves, the more they liberate their capability for gross self-indulgence.

Liberated Men.

Boring Old Sexist Issues.

There are many feminists who demand that porno mags should be banned or, at the very least, that local newsagents should wrap them in paper so they aren’t on display. This is fair enough. Children ought to be protected from this sort of material. But what makes this protestation increasingly discordant is not merely the increasing numbers of women going to strip clubs, buying male porno magazines, and going on sex cruises to africa and the caribbean, etc., but that some of the protesters are white women with serial black relationships.[47] This seems like a case of women demanding that men shouldn’t judge women on their looks whilst judging males this way. Is it possible the bores are incensed about porno magazines not because they encourage men to judge women by their looks and attributes but because they encourage black men to try pastures new?

The frequency with which this contradiction in women’s attitudes is beginning to surface makes it seem as if we’re now getting to the stage in the liberation process where women are pushing feminist ideology beyond the demand for equality and toward the extremes of historical retribution. In other words, feminist bigots don’t demand that everyone should stop judging people by their appearance but that men should stop acting this way whilst women should be allowed to do what they want. What they want isn’t equality with men and a utopian, egalitarian society but the creation of some modern form of medieval feminism in which women can enjoy the same dominance that men enjoyed for many millennia. As far as they are concerned, there will be true equality between men and women only after women have dominated men for the same length of time that men dominated women. This clearly is just a recipe for irresponsibility.

New Men in their Old Age.

The term ‘new man’ became commonplace in the early 1980s. It was perhaps one of those social clichés that helped to foster what later became depicted by the politically conventional as ‘political correctness’. These ‘new men’ have since grown older. Having contributed to the liberation of both women and blacks it’s ironic that many of these thirty-forty-fifty somethings now find themselves thrown out of work and facing increasing levels of prejudice when trying to find a new job, “The facts speak for themselves. Britain’s bosses are treating mature people badly. Of nine million people aged 50 to 64, 3.7 million are jobless. Many are victims of age discrimination by employers wanting younger staff.”[48] Many companies are all too eager to employ young women and, to a lesser extent young blacks, but not middle aged, white males. History is a field of ironies and one of the manure pats in this field is that these old ‘new men’ managed to get laws onto the statute books against racial and sexual discrimination but never bothered to do the same for ageism.

Perhaps the reason for the absence of legislation against ageism is the notorious masochism of white pc males - for example, tolerating behaviour by women and blacks which they find intolerable amongst white males.[49] It says a lot about the psyche of the white pc male, especially those in the labour government and party, that they are perfectly willing to embark on long campaigns to proscribe intolerance against women, blacks and the disabled but are not willing to do anything about the increasing discrimination against older people - whether men, women, blacks or disabled - except boost pensions. Sure the labour government has played an enormous part in transforming race relations by supporting the lawrence enquiry but what has it done about ageism - zilch.

The Childless in a Sprog Riddled Society.

So what sort of world does the unattached, between-jobs, childless, 30-60 something, male find himself living in? It’s world where he’s expected to finance other people’s sexual activities, their reproductive activities, as well as the upbringing of other people’s children. He has to pay for free condoms so that other people can have sex. He has to pay for std clinics because people can’t be bothered using condoms. He has to pay for abortion facilities when people have too much sex. He has to pay for infertility treatment so that couples, even unmarried couples and, worst of all, single women, can have test tube babies. These days he also has to pay for lifetime supplies of viagra so that couples can enjoy what he’s unable to obtain through the national health service. He also has to finance child benefit.[50] But, worst of all, is financing all the nurseries, schools, and new housing, that children entail.

The unattached, childless, male thus finds himself paying for a wide range of services which he himself does not enjoy. However, these economic injustices are petty. They’d hardly be worth the effort of summarizing if it wasn’t for one thing - feminism. In the past if a man was unattached, and wanted at least some contact with members of the opposite sex, no matter how minimal this was, he’d buy a porno mag/video, go to a porno film, a strip club, hire a prostitute or ultimately, go for a hot holiday. And yet these days he can’t enjoy any of these activities without huge dollops of feminist abuse, derision and contempt - expecting men to maintain an utterly absurd, saint-like chastity (no magazines, no videos, no strip joints, no holidays). Men are being denounced and reviled for even thinking about sex whilst at the very same time having to fund women’s sexual activities, the various products of their sexual activities (such as chlamydia or sprogs) as well as child benefit and the housing/schools required for the maintenance of these products.

Once again, however, these ideological injustices aren’t of any greater significance than the economic injustices. Far worse is that whilst men have to endure the compulsory subsidization of social prostitution, and endless feminist denunciations, they now have to watch increasing numbers of women engaging in activities for which men are denounced. What is more, wo-men are engaging in such activities without feminists condemning them in the same way as they condemn men. Wo-men can now freely buy porno mags, go to strip clubs, go on sex cruises, and go out with tarts or toy boys, and do so triumphally as a sign of their liberation, whilst men are condemned for the same activities. It is becoming intolerable having to endure feminist tirades about society’s sexism and racism whilst they’re sleeping around with tarts and toy boys.

For ten-twenty years males have been harangued by feminists about how bad men are; how marvellous wo-men are; what wonderful virtues wo-men possess; and how marvellous society would be if only liberated wo-men were able to spread such virtues into public life. But this hasn’t happened. What has happened is that increasing numbers of liberated wo-men are now indulging in the same vices as those for which men have been condemned. Still, one of the great benefits for men now suffering from ageism in the jobs market, and racism in the love market, is not having to pay for the sheer self indulgence of so many bores. It’s time women paid for their own pleasures.