Since the second world war doctors have been educated and trained in prestigious institutions and the elite of the profession have pursued glamorous careers in prestigious hospitals, teaching institutions, or research institutes. With the exponential growth in medical understanding, increasingly powerful and sophisticated diagnostic technology, and the power of life and death over their patients, many came to regard themselves almost as divine beings - thankfully bus drivers haven’t drifted off the scale of ooman values in the same way. Over the decades their self-image as semi-divine beings reached a pinnacle of imperiousness which tolerated no criticisms whether from patients or from those outside the medical profession. They enjoyed the reverence of the public so they had no need to answer criticisms about what they were doing. And the public didn’t expect them to take any notice of such criticisms. Politicians allowed them to get away with such high-handedness firstly, because doctors were part of a solidly organized trade union which went out of its way to protect its members’ interests and would rarely rule against its own members and, secondly, because the public admired doctors far more than they did politicians. Politicians could not risk openly challenging the medical elite. They knew all too well that if there was a choice between a politician and a doctor, the public would always choose the latter.

One of the fallouts of the medical profession’s self divination came in an oxford hospital, one of the most prestigious in its field around the world. The two main surgeons spent so much time engaged in intense battles for status within the hospital they had little time for operations. They repeatedly cancelled emergency heart operations and messed up the lives of hundreds of people. Nurses fled the hospital because they couldn’t put up with the vicious political struggles. The efficiency and usefulness of the hospital plummeted. Such status wars are doubtlessly common in medical institutions around the country. What greater example of the hopelessness of the belief in ooman progress. Here were two of the world’s most educated and highly trained individuals who had the resources of a small kingdom at their disposal and they spent large parts of their time tearing each other apart.

For generations the medical profession had been stealing from the dead and deceiving their relatives on a massive scale. Many of the thefts were carried out by pathologists during post-mortem examinations but surgeons were also involved. What added to the distress felt by the relatives of the victims of doctors’ criminal activities was that some of the stolen organs had been disposed of as industrial rubbish. The medical profession had even been selling organs to pharmaceutical companies. The media, of course, scapegoated one doctor (who not surprisingly was a dirty rotten johnny foreigner) but the practice was commonplace in many hospitals around the country. Ironically, the more prestigious the hospitals, the more likely the doctors there were to have been involved in theft and deception, “A total of 4,400 organs - all brains - are kept by the oxford radcliffe hospitals trust. They are stored at the radcliffe infirmary, which is nationally renowned for neuro-science, and used for teaching or research into brain injuries, schizophrenia or new variant cjd. They were removed at the john radcliffe hospital during post-mortem examinations ordered by the coroner or carried out with relatives’ consent to determine the cause of death. Oxford University medical school has 1,000 organs - the fifth highest among the country’s medical schools. But mr highton said this collection had not been added to since 1982, and most of the organs were removed during surgery rather than during post-mortem examinations.”[22]

The medical practice of stealing organs was known about by virtually the entire profession because so many people were involved in aiding and abetting these criminal activities. Nurses were needed to help extract the organs from patients; technicians had to look after organ collections; administrators provided the finance for the upkeep of these collections; and researchers wanted to experiment on the organs. In other words, many participated in, or benefited from, this practice and the whole of the medical profession kept this terrible secret for decades - and probably far longer than that.

The country was shocked to the core by what doctors had been doing. The ‘voice of the mirror’ asked, “What concerns us is how such a horrible scandal could have happened.”[23] Some of the victims’ relatives called for the prosecution of doctors involved in these crimes, “A family called today for the prosecution of oxford doctors who removed their dead son’s brain and threw it away as medical waste. Paul and barbie clynes spoke out after it was revealed that oxford hospitals had the second highest number of human organs in storage. A total of 4,400 brains have been stored over the past 30 years at the radcliffe infirmary for teaching and research. Hospital officials accepted that many families would not have been aware that brains had been removed from their loved ones.”[24]

One provincial newspaper was aghast at the deception, “The dictionary defines ‘trust’ as a firm belief in the reliability of people or organizations to act responsibly towards others. Today, the oxford radcliffe hospitals nhs trust stands unworthy of this word in its title. Revelations about the storing of 4,400 brains for research purposes, removed from bodies over a 30 year period and mostly without the permission of bereaved families, display a degree of arrogance, conceit and callousness that beggars belief. What we now demand is a new openness, total honesty and a fresh approach to the dignity and feelings of others from our local health trusts.”[25] Doctors’ claims to divine providence, which had led them to act with a high handed imperiousness usually reserved for royalty, had rebounded upon them. How the mighty have fallen. In future, it would be difficult for the medical profession to continue pretending that it is unreservedly trustworthy, honest, and truthful, let alone semi-divine.

Whilst the brutish public has held the medical profession in high esteem, around the world it has become a laughing stock, “The beef-eaters, myself included, have been saved by our resistance - not by the government scientists, the government vets, and the Department of Health, whose advice has been as dangerously bad about BSE and CJD as it was over HIV, haemophilia and hepatitis C. In a less dramatic way, their tardiness in supporting adequate screening for high blood pressure, breast cancer, cervical cancer and prostatic cancer has made these aspects of British medicine the object of the world’s derision.”[27]

The enormity of this travesty needs a little explanation. Bse was discovered in Cattle in 1986 and almost immediately it was suspected that the disease could spread to Sheep. However, the maffia had no intention of seeing the Sheep industry collapse in the same way as the Cattle industry no matter how serious the health threat so it firstly refused to carry out any experiments and then, reluctantly, agreed to carry out Animal experiments which it knew would take years to complete. The experiments were started in 1997 and were due for completion in 2002-2003. In other words, nearly twenty years after the first discovery of bse, the country’s leading scientists still had no idea whether the country’s Sheep flocks were infected by the disease and how widespread the disease was, “Professor david king, the government’s chief scientist, said, “We want to know what the bse content, if any, is in sheep today, and we don’t know that.”[28] What makes the use of Animal experiments all the more shocking is that it only needed to take a couple of hours to discover whether Sheep had the disease - all they needed to do to was to take a sample of brain from an Animal killed in an abattoir and put it under the microscope. There is no other reason for taking five years over an experiment that could have been done in five minutes than protecting the interests of the Sheep industry.[29] This proves conclusively that Animal experiments are of use only in defending vested interests and that, far from saving ooman lives, they increase ooman fatalities.

It would be a tragedy if the outcome of the stolen organs’ expose of doctors’ gross deceptions and misconduct is an increase in Animal experiments. The doctors who have desecrated the dead, deceived the relatives of the deceased, and abused the public’s trust, are the same people who believe in the integrity of Animal experiments despite the fact that the history of Animal experiments shows they are not merely worthless but have been used politically to defend vested interests. In the past, many people may have been inclined to support vivisectors because of their trust for the medical profession but after the organ theft scandal the public should start doubting their trustworthiness and reliability and, after the wrong brains’ experiment, they should start questioning the validity of vivisection. It is time that people started treating vivisectors with the same contempt they treat Fox hunters and their ilk.

Charles windsor is bringing up his sons to be very religious, “Prince william has developed a craving for shooting Animals which has shocked his uncle prince andrew. The duke of york was walking his Dog in windsor great park when he noticed there was little sign of Wildlife. When he raised the subject with a park warden he was told, “That’s because your nephew has been down here, sir. He’s killed everything in sight. The warden told him william had shot dozens of Squirrels, Rabbits and Birds on several visits. One servant said, “Hunting is his passion.” Wills has been using the private grounds of the park near the royal lodge, the queen mother’s home. William recently killed his first Stag during a visit to balmoral.”[36] Fox hunting is the barbarism at the heart of the royal family.

In 1997, the labour government had been in power for only a few months before its first capitulation over Fox hunting. Even its own friends started referring to it as U-Labour, “A pledge to suspend licenses for hunting on Forestry Commission land turned into a review and a promise to end badger killing has been dropped. And the government has U-turned twice over Animal experiments on behalf of the cosmetics industry. Before the election Labour said it would provide all the parliamentary time needed for such a bill to become law. After the election they changed their minds - which would effectively kill the bill ..”[42] A couple of weeks later, “Ministers sparked fury last night by approving fox hunting on army land. They renewed licenses for the field sport on the ministry of defence’s 500,000 acres after farmers threatened to disrupt exercises.”[43]

Basically mcblair hoped the Fox hunting issue would just go away after he’d been elected to office with the support of all those who were taken in by his promise to banish such cruelty. He refused to give government backing for a bill banning hunting on the grounds that it would provoke the unelected, and undemocratic, house of lords to disrupt the government’s legislative programme. The lie to this was that in 1998 the government decided to give mps a massive summer break, one of the longest in recent history, rather than allow them to use this time to ensure the passage of a Fox hunting bill. Mcblair’s refusal to sponsor a Fox hunting bill would have been the end of the issue during his first administration if it hadn’t been for labour mp mike foster winning a parliamentary lottery. The winner of the lottery is given the chance to promote a private members’ bill - and the topic he chose was a ban on Fox hunting. If it hadn’t been for this luck of the draw then virtually nothing else would have been said about Fox hunting during mcblair’s first administration.

Not surprisingly, foster’s private members’ bill eventually failed. The prime minister fled the country when given the opportunity to vote on it. The government continually evaded having to take any action over the bill, “A ban on fox hunting was kicked into the long grass by the government last night. Home secretary jack straw said mps would be given a free vote on a series of options. They are likely to range from no change to the favourite, an outright ban. Yesterday’s announcement came after an inquiry by burns found a ban could cost up to 8,000 jobs. Mr Straw said, “The government is, and remains, neutral on the merits of whether hunting with hounds should be banned.” Labour mp gordon prentice said he would now withdraw his threat to scupper the right to roam bill by amending it to include fox hunting.”[44]

Even after the government had supposedly reformed the house of lords, it continued to evade a ban on hunting. The reform should have meant the lords would be a much closer reflection of public opinion which should have enabled a ban on Fox hunting to be passed. However, the reformed house of lords is just as opposed to Fox hunting as it was during the days when it was run by the aristocratic hereditary elite, “The house of lords last night voted against a ban on fox hunting by 317 votes to 68.”[45]

The work done by the Fox hunting brigade during the foot and mouth epidemic is bound to ensure the survival of Fox hunting during mcblair’s second administration, “Trained hunt staff have been called in by the Ministry of Agriculture to slaughter livestock with foot and mouth disease within a week of agriculture ministers voting to ban hunting. Hunt staff have slaughtering skills and are licensed to use humane killers because of the service routinely provided by hunt kennels to remove "fallen stock", farm animals and horses that are wounded or elderly. This service, which took away 366,000 fallen stock in 1999, was estimated to save farmers £3.37 million a year by the Burns inquiry on hunting. David Jones, the huntsman of the David Davies hunt, which is based at Newtown, Powys, slaughtered 400 sheep and 70 cattle at Felindre, near Newtown, last Friday. Roy Savage, of the Teme Valley Foxhounds, and David Morgan, of the Radnor and West Hereford, slaughtered 250 sheep at Newcastle on Clun over the weekend. Other licensed slaughtermen working for hunt kennels, including George Hyatt of the South Devon, which includes part of Dartmoor in its hunt country, have been put on standby by the State Veterinary Service's regional control centres.”[46]; “Among those who have not been paid are hundreds of kennel slaughtermen provided by the Master of Foxhounds Association to kill stock for £18 per hour. They did the work in late March and early April, the association said yesterday. The British Veterinary Association, which provided more than 1,000 temporary veterinary inspectors at £250 per day, reported similar delays. In Cumbria, Hugo Busby, a master of foxhounds for the Portman Hunt in Dorset, who has been working as a slaughterman in Cumbria since April 2, said there had been complaints among slaughtermen. "I think a lot of people were getting frustrated," he said. "The cheques for teams who were working here seven weeks ago have only just started dribbling through. But they keep promising things are going to get better.” Both the British Veterinary Association and The Master of Foxhounds Association said they had made representations to Maff in an attempt to speed up the payment process. "We have had some complaints," said George Bowyer, of the MFHA. "But a lot of those were fuelled by rumours that there was something sinister in the delays and Maff wasn't going to pay. We have been reassured that they will. They are just overwhelmed by the paperwork at the moment and are struggling to clear the backlog."”[47]

It has been pointed out above that, over the last 15 centuries or so, aristocratic hunters/pharmers devastated the country’s Wildlife to such an extent that today most of it consists of exotic species. And yet according to page, it is hunters who have been helping to preserve the country’s Wildlife and protect its environment! “The irony is that it is the hunters and shooters who are managing the countryside in a practical and conservation-friendly way. They are retaining and managing woodlands, grassland, wetland and hedgerows. As a consequence, serious conservationists should be praising their work. Sadly, myself and david bellamy are almost the only two who are prepared to put our heads above the parapet of political correctness to say so.”[51]; “The exceptions to this rule are in the areas where hunting, shooting and fishing take place, and i write this as a conservationist who does not hunt, shoot or fish. Where habitat is left for the fox and the pheasant, it also creates a wider range of habitats for other forms of wildlife such as the otter, the barn owl and the bee orchid.”[52]

Page’s assumption is that hunters coolly and dispassionately determine how many Animals they will hunt and then protect the rest from being killed. This has never happened in the history of hunting. Hunting has always been a blood bath in which hunters kill as many Animals as they can, as quickly as possible, with not the slightest thought about species’ protection. Hunters are puerile, red-necked, insensitive, thugs who are intellectually incapable of limiting their hunting perversion. The complete bankruptcy of brutland’s Biodiversity is a testimony to hunters’ barbarism. This country has virtually no indigenous Wildlife because it has been eliminated by hunters and pharmers.

Every Grouse shooting estate has gamekeepers, and perhaps under keepers, who protect the Grouse by slaughtering its predators. The list of species persecuted includes Fox, Stoat, Hedgehogs, Mink, Weasel, Squirrel, Rat, Magpie, Crow, Rook, Jay, Jackdaw, and even protected species such as Badger, Otter, Marten, and Wildcat. Although Birds of prey such as the Hen Harrier, Marsh Harrier, Red Kite, Sparrowhawk, Buzzard, Golden Eagle, Peregrine Falcon, Osprey, Kestrel, Merlin, Hobby, Goshawk and all species of Owl, are protected by law, their persecution is carried out nationally by many of britain’s 5,000 keepers. Gamekeepers string the victims together onto a gibbet line which is displayed in countryside areas apparently because the rednecks believe urban folk like to see quaint rural traditions.

Methods of killing these Animals include snaring, trapping, shooting, and poisoning. While snaring is favoured for Foxes etc, illegal poisons are by far the favourite for Birds of prey. A Rabbit carcass is laid on the ground usually where it can be seen from the air and is laced with poisons. This is what the countryside people and greens call living in harmony with nature.”[60]; “It seems to be an axiom of game ‘management’ that the natural predators of pheasant and grouse must be killed in order that another predator, man, can slaughter greater numbers of the prey, ritually, at a later date. Peregrine, buzzard, golden eagle and other hawks and owls are still shot and poisoned on gaming estates, even though they are protected by law. .. other ‘vermin’ which are killed for the sake of the shoot: stoats, weasels, jays, magpies, crows, pigeons, rats, adders ..”[61]

Shooters leave behind them in the countryside tons of toxic lead, and non-biodegradable plastic, cartridges. These cartridges pollte the environment.

The Animal enslavement industry has a long tradition of revolting, unnatural practices. There is nothing natural about it - as is all too obvious from the huge aircraft hangers it has constructed in many parts of the countryside. Traditional rural life means turning herbivores into carnivores/cannibals; forcing slave Animals to eat their own shit; forcibly inseminating them; and doping them up with illegal antibiotics - illegal drug taking amongst pharmers being almost as rampant as drug taking at an all night rave. Giving the Animal enslavement industry e.g. the maffia, control over the countryside is like giving the mafia control over the bank of england.