Carbonomics Countries no.1: Britain’s Carbon Status. Britain is a Geophysiological Disaster Zone: The Autumn 2000 Floods were proof of the Country’s Gross Unsustainability.

• To give an example of just how appalling the country’s geophysiological condition has become - even agriculture releases 8 times more Carbon pollution than is being absorbed by the country’s Forests, "In 1990, greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture were 24.8mtC, or around 12% of the u.k’s total greenhouse gas emissions, including emissions estimated to be 8.7mtC from land use change."

• If britain tried to reduce its Carbon debts solely by reducing its Carbon emissions even a 50% reduction in Carbon emissions (from 160mtC per year to 80mtC whilst Carbon imports remain at 2.9mtC) would only increase the percentage of Carbon imports to Carbon exports from a truly pathetic 1.4% to a minuscule 2.8%.

• If britain wanted to balance its Carbon status it would have to reduce its Carbon emissions from 160mtC a year to 2.9mtC a year - a reduction of 98%.

• The british countryside’s green beauty has an astro-turf nature which, unfortunately, disguises the wholesale devastation of the Earth’s life sustaining processes in this country. Thankfully, the autumn 2000 floods exposed, in a much more vivid way than government statistics, the sham of the country’s belief in its rich and luxuriant Biodiversity. It is just as ridiculous to talk about the country’s ‘green and pleasant motorways’ as it to talk about the country’s ‘green and pleasant’ countryside.

• Britain’s environment resembles a vast frying pan covered in lard in one of the country’s cheap motorway cafeterias specializing in traditional english breakfasts for imminent heart attack victims.

The devastation of britain’s Photosynthetic capacity i.e. its life sustaining processes, suggests it must have been a major contributor to the autumn 2000 floods. Throughout the country’s entire history, its Photosynthetic capacity has probably never been as threadbare as it is now. The deformation of the british countryside has not merely contributed to global burning, it has created almost ideal conditions for flooding. If a group of eco-nazis got together to work out what they could do to turn the country into an enormous flood zone they couldn’t have done a better job than the country’s pharmers and their green allies. Perhaps the most accurate analogy to describe the country’s virtually non-existent life sustaining processes is that it resembles a vast frying pan covered in lard in one of the country’s cheap motorway cafes which specialize in traditional english breakfasts for the next generation of heart attack victims.

• In britain, the Earth’s Photosynthetic capacity>the Earth’s climate stabilization system>the Earth’s life support system, has been virtually annihilated. It could almost serve as a definition of a geophysiological disaster zone. In some ways it’s far worse than environmental conditions found in deserts!

• The belief that britain is a ‘green and pleasant land’ is a politically induced delusion. To be more accurate it is an ideological crop fertilized by propaganda from the country’s landowning pharming elite. Croplands around the country - most of which are grown to feed Animalkind - are planted, fertilised, protected, managed, harvested, stored, and marketed, with the aid of vast quantities of fossil fuels. They are just green oil slicks. The Plants/Crops/Grasses produced from crude oil aren’t much different from plastic plates or shopping bags. The countryside’s green beauty has an astro-turf nature which, unfortunately, disguises the wholesale devastation of the Earth’s life sustaining processes in this country. Thankfully, the autumn 2000 floods exposed, in a much more vivid way than government statistics, the sham of the country’s belief in its rich and luxuriant Biodiversity. It is just as ridiculous to talk about the country’s ‘green and pleasant motorways’ as it the country’s ‘green and pleasant’ countryside.

• It is believed that the primary action which needs to be taken to combat future floods is the con-struction of flood defence systems. Flood con-struction projects are social mausoleums for demented eco-nazis.

The total area of the united kingdom is approximately 250,000km2. This means that british emissions per square kilometre are 160,000,000tC divided by 250,000km2 which is 640tC/km2. That is, every square kilometre in the country is emitting, on average, approximately 640tC every year.

In comparison, the average amount of Carbon released per square kilometre around the world is 7.66gtC divided by 149,000,000 km2 which equals about 51tC. Britain’s Carbon emissions per square kilometre are a massive 640tC - which is 12.5 times the global average. Once again, this reveals the staggering scale of the devastation this country has inflicted on its share of the Earth’s life support system. It reveals all too clearly the enormous contribution that brutland is making, proportionately speaking, to the destabilization of the climate and immizerization around the world.

If britain released Carbon at the global rate of Carbon emissions per square kilometre its total emissions would be 250,000km2 multiplied by 51tC/km2 i.e. a mere 12,750,000tC in comparison to current emissions of 160,000,000tC. Yet again, this reveals the gross disparity between the super-abundant consumerism enjoyed by consumers in brutland in comparison to the far more moderate rates of consumption around the rest of the world.

Another way of presenting these basic facts of the country’s geophysiological condition is to look at the state of the Earth’s climate if britain’s Carbon emissions per square kilometre were common around the world - in other words, what the state of the Earth would be like if every country was wrecking the Earth’s life support system to the same extent as britain. Given that the land area of the Earth is approximately 149,000,000 km2 then, on the basis of britain’s emissions of 640tC per km2 per year, this would mean global emissions would be 95gtC per year. This is far in excess of the rather paltry 7.6gtC which are currently being released around the world.

It is also possible to calculate from the above figures the area of land needed to absorb britain’s current Carbon emissions. Britain currently releases 160,0000,000tC per year so if this was absorbed at the rate of 51tCkm2 (the global average for the absorption of Carbon) then the area required would be 3,000,000km2. Given that britain’s land area is 250,000km2 this means the country would need an area 12 times its own size in order to absorb all the Carbon it is currently emitting.

• 3,000,000km2 of land around the world to absorb its Carbon emissions;

• 2,000,000km2 of land to extract resources from around the world; and,

• 1,000,000km2 of land to absorb the Carbon emissions from its imports of Phytomass.

In other words britain, whose land area is a mere quarter of a million square kilometres, is using approximately 6 million km2 of land around the planet whose area of land is approximately 149 million km2. In other words, Britain, with 1/600 of the Earth’s land, affects, in one way or another, roughly 6 million square kilometres or 4% of the Earth’s land area. It is using, for its own benefit, roughly 24 times its own land area.

The total area of the united kingdom is approximately 25,000,000 hectares. If it takes one hectare of forest land to absorb five tonnes of carbon a year and if the entire country was covered in Forests, this would mean the country could absorb only 125,000,000tC per year - still 35gtC short of being able to absorb all of its emissions. The labour government and the national pharmers union claim the country is close to sustainability. The above calculation reveals this is utter twaddle. The country couldn’t get further away from unsustainability even if it dropped off the planet and set up its own orbit around the solar system.

If britain had the global average population density, the country’s population would be equal to 10 million. This means there would have to be a dramatic sixfold reduction in the brutish population if the country was to conform to the global average.

Britain was the first country to industrialize and has burnt a large quantity of biofuels, some in the form of fossil fuels such as coal and oil, the rest mainly Wood drawn from Forests. As a consequence, since the start of the industrial revolution, taken to be 1750, it is likely that it has exported far more Carbon into the atmosphere than it has absorbed. Using back of the envelope calculations britain’s historical Carbon debt could be in the region of 6gtC.

Assume that because of the dire threat posed by global burning, a world climate authority is established to stabilize the climate by setting a global Carbon budget and national Carbon budgets for each country around the world. For the sake of simplicity assume that this means returning the climate to the state it was in at the start of the industrial revolution. This would mean that britain’s historical Carbon budget for the creation of a sustainable planet would be 6gtC. If these debts had to be paid off within 30 years then britain would have to change from being a net annual Carbon exporter of 157mtC to a net Carbon importer of 200 mtC per annum.

• Given the country’s Carbon budget it would not be possible to balance its budget merely through pollution curbs. It would require wholesale deconstruction of the Animal enslavement industry. Half the country would have to be Reforested and some of it would need to be declared as Wilderness areas in order to dramatically increase the country's Carbon absorption capacity. The scale of the country’s Carbon debts are such that Reforestation is not an insignificant but an essential policy. No amount of pollution reduction policies are going to import enough Carbon to enable the country to repay its debts to the Earth.

• There is not the slightest hope of combating global burning, stabilizing the climate, or creating a sustainable planet, without abolishing the slave pharming industry and allowing the land to revert back to Forests. If this is not done then people might as well forget about protecting the environment and just go out and party as much as they can before the Earth’s life sustaining processes collapse. All other environmental policies are superficial because they cannot restore the Earth’s life sustaining processes in this country. The only thing such policies are good for are to make people think that something is being done to protect the environment when, in reality, all they are doing is covering up the damage which the eco-nazis are inflicting on the Earth.

The Issues in this Issue.
		Britain’s Current Carbon Status. • Britain’s current Carbon exports, the release of Carbon emissions into the atmosphere, are 160mtC a year whilst its imports, through Photosynthesis, are 2.9mtC. This means:- firstly, that the country is a Carbon debtor of 157.1mtC per year; secondly, that the country’s Carbon absorption is only a meagre 1.4% of its Carbon emissions. There is probably no other country around the world which has a more appalling environment. • To give an example of just how appalling the country’s geophysiological condition has become - even agriculture releases 8 times more Carbon pollution than is being absorbed by the country’s Forests, "In 1990, greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture were 24.8mtC, or around 12% of the u.k’s total greenhouse gas emissions, including emissions estimated to be 8.7mtC from land use change." • If britain tried to reduce its Carbon debts solely by reducing its Carbon emissions even a 50% reduction in Carbon emissions (from 160mtC per year to 80mtC whilst Carbon imports remain at 2.9mtC) would only increase the percentage of Carbon imports to Carbon exports from a truly pathetic 1.4% to a minuscule 2.8%. • If britain wanted to balance its Carbon status it would have to reduce its Carbon emissions from 160mtC a year to 2.9mtC a year - a reduction of 98%. • The british countryside’s green beauty has an astro-turf nature which, unfortunately, disguises the wholesale devastation of the Earth’s life sustaining processes in this country. Thankfully, the autumn 2000 floods exposed, in a much more vivid way than government statistics, the sham of the country’s belief in its rich and luxuriant Biodiversity. It is just as ridiculous to talk about the country’s ‘green and pleasant motorways’ as it to talk about the country’s ‘green and pleasant’ countryside. • Britain’s environment resembles a vast frying pan covered in lard in one of the country’s cheap motorway cafeterias specializing in traditional english breakfasts for imminent heart attack victims. Conclusions about Britain’s Current Carbon Status. The devastation of britain’s Photosynthetic capacity i.e. its life sustaining processes, suggests it must have been a major contributor to the autumn 2000 floods. Throughout the country’s entire history, its Photosynthetic capacity has probably never been as threadbare as it is now. The deformation of the british countryside has not merely contributed to global burning, it has created almost ideal conditions for flooding. If a group of eco-nazis got together to work out what they could do to turn the country into an enormous flood zone they couldn’t have done a better job than the country’s pharmers and their green allies. Perhaps the most accurate analogy to describe the country’s virtually non-existent life sustaining processes is that it resembles a vast frying pan covered in lard in one of the country’s cheap motorway cafes which specialize in traditional english breakfasts for the next generation of heart attack victims. • In britain, the Earth’s Photosynthetic capacity>the Earth’s climate stabilization system>the Earth’s life support system, has been virtually annihilated. It could almost serve as a definition of a geophysiological disaster zone. In some ways it’s far worse than environmental conditions found in deserts! • The belief that britain is a ‘green and pleasant land’ is a politically induced delusion. To be more accurate it is an ideological crop fertilized by propaganda from the country’s landowning pharming elite. Croplands around the country - most of which are grown to feed Animalkind - are planted, fertilised, protected, managed, harvested, stored, and marketed, with the aid of vast quantities of fossil fuels. They are just green oil slicks. The Plants/Crops/Grasses produced from crude oil aren’t much different from plastic plates or shopping bags. The countryside’s green beauty has an astro-turf nature which, unfortunately, disguises the wholesale devastation of the Earth’s life sustaining processes in this country. Thankfully, the autumn 2000 floods exposed, in a much more vivid way than government statistics, the sham of the country’s belief in its rich and luxuriant Biodiversity. It is just as ridiculous to talk about the country’s ‘green and pleasant motorways’ as it the country’s ‘green and pleasant’ countryside. • It is believed that the primary action which needs to be taken to combat future floods is the con-struction of flood defence systems. Flood con-struction projects are social mausoleums for demented eco-nazis. British Emissions per Square Kilometre. The total area of the united kingdom is approximately 250,000km2. This means that british emissions per square kilometre are 160,000,000tC divided by 250,000km2 which is 640tC/km2. That is, every square kilometre in the country is emitting, on average, approximately 640tC every year. Comparing British, to Global, Emissions per Square Kilometre. In comparison, the average amount of Carbon released per square kilometre around the world is 7.66gtC divided by 149,000,000 km2 which equals about 51tC. Britain’s Carbon emissions per square kilometre are a massive 640tC - which is 12.5 times the global average. Once again, this reveals the staggering scale of the devastation this country has inflicted on its share of the Earth’s life support system. It reveals all too clearly the enormous contribution that brutland is making, proportionately speaking, to the destabilization of the climate and immizerization around the world. Comparing Britain’s current total Carbon Emissions to its total Carbon Emissions if based on the Global Average of Carbon Emissions per Square Kilometre. If britain released Carbon at the global rate of Carbon emissions per square kilometre its total emissions would be 250,000km2 multiplied by 51tC/km2 i.e. a mere 12,750,000tC in comparison to current emissions of 160,000,000tC. Yet again, this reveals the gross disparity between the super-abundant consumerism enjoyed by consumers in brutland in comparison to the far more moderate rates of consumption around the rest of the world. The Percentage Reductions in Carbon Emissions Britain would have to make in order to be on a par with the Rest of the World. If britain had to reduce its emissions per square kilometre to the global average this would mean reductions of 92%. The State of the Global Climate if Britain’s Carbon Emissions per Square Kilometre were the average for the Earth. Another way of presenting these basic facts of the country’s geophysiological condition is to look at the state of the Earth’s climate if britain’s Carbon emissions per square kilometre were common around the world - in other words, what the state of the Earth would be like if every country was wrecking the Earth’s life support system to the same extent as britain. Given that the land area of the Earth is approximately 149,000,000 km2 then, on the basis of britain’s emissions of 640tC per km2 per year, this would mean global emissions would be 95gtC per year. This is far in excess of the rather paltry 7.6gtC which are currently being released around the world. The Area of Land around the World needed to mop up the Country’s Current Carbon Emissions. It is also possible to calculate from the above figures the area of land needed to absorb britain’s current Carbon emissions. Britain currently releases 160,0000,000tC per year so if this was absorbed at the rate of 51tCkm2 (the global average for the absorption of Carbon) then the area required would be 3,000,000km2. Given that britain’s land area is 250,000km2 this means the country would need an area 12 times its own size in order to absorb all the Carbon it is currently emitting. The Area of Land around the World that Britain is Using for its own Benefit. In conclusion, what this means is that britain requires:- • 3,000,000km2 of land around the world to absorb its Carbon emissions; • 2,000,000km2 of land to extract resources from around the world; and, • 1,000,000km2 of land to absorb the Carbon emissions from its imports of Phytomass. In other words britain, whose land area is a mere quarter of a million square kilometres, is using approximately 6 million km2 of land around the planet whose area of land is approximately 149 million km2. In other words, Britain, with 1/600 of the Earth’s land, affects, in one way or another, roughly 6 million square kilometres or 4% of the Earth’s land area. It is using, for its own benefit, roughly 24 times its own land area. Britain couldn’t absorb its current Emissions even if it covered the entire country with Forests. The total area of the united kingdom is approximately 25,000,000 hectares. If it takes one hectare of forest land to absorb five tonnes of carbon a year and if the entire country was covered in Forests, this would mean the country could absorb only 125,000,000tC per year - still 35gtC short of being able to absorb all of its emissions. The labour government and the national pharmers union claim the country is close to sustainability. The above calculation reveals this is utter twaddle. The country couldn’t get further away from unsustainability even if it dropped off the planet and set up its own orbit around the solar system. The Country’s Population if it were to have the Global Average of people per square Kilometre. If britain had the global average population density, the country’s population would be equal to 10 million. This means there would have to be a dramatic sixfold reduction in the brutish population if the country was to conform to the global average. Britain’s Historical Carbon Status. Britain was the first country to industrialize and has burnt a large quantity of biofuels, some in the form of fossil fuels such as coal and oil, the rest mainly Wood drawn from Forests. As a consequence, since the start of the industrial revolution, taken to be 1750, it is likely that it has exported far more Carbon into the atmosphere than it has absorbed. Using back of the envelope calculations britain’s historical Carbon debt could be in the region of 6gtC. Britain’s Carbon Budget for the Creation of a Sustainable Planet. Assume that because of the dire threat posed by global burning, a world climate authority is established to stabilize the climate by setting a global Carbon budget and national Carbon budgets for each country around the world. For the sake of simplicity assume that this means returning the climate to the state it was in at the start of the industrial revolution. This would mean that britain’s historical Carbon budget for the creation of a sustainable planet would be 6gtC. If these debts had to be paid off within 30 years then britain would have to change from being a net annual Carbon exporter of 157mtC to a net Carbon importer of 200 mtC per annum. Recommendation. • Given the country’s Carbon budget it would not be possible to balance its budget merely through pollution curbs. It would require wholesale deconstruction of the Animal enslavement industry. Half the country would have to be Reforested and some of it would need to be declared as Wilderness areas in order to dramatically increase the country's Carbon absorption capacity. The scale of the country’s Carbon debts are such that Reforestation is not an insignificant but an essential policy. No amount of pollution reduction policies are going to import enough Carbon to enable the country to repay its debts to the Earth. • There is not the slightest hope of combating global burning, stabilizing the climate, or creating a sustainable planet, without abolishing the slave pharming industry and allowing the land to revert back to Forests. If this is not done then people might as well forget about protecting the environment and just go out and party as much as they can before the Earth’s life sustaining processes collapse. All other environmental policies are superficial because they cannot restore the Earth’s life sustaining processes in this country. The only thing such policies are good for are to make people think that something is being done to protect the environment when, in reality, all they are doing is covering up the damage which the eco-nazis are inflicting on the Earth.

All publications are copyrighted mundi club © You are welcome to quote from these publications as long as you acknowledge the source - and we'd be grateful if you sent us a copy.	We welcome additional information, comments, or criticisms. Email: carbonomics@yahoo.co.uk The Mundi Club Website: http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/
To respond to points made on this website visit our blog at http://mundiclub.blogspot.com/

The Issues in this Issue.