Simplicity
I listened to a radio program on KSFO out of San Francisco, the DJ Brian Wilson and his guest Angel Shamaya talked about Second Amendment issues. And the big reason for this particular show was the judgement that was handed down by Judge Anderson in the Bob Stewart in Arizona. I would like to say that both Brian and Angel did and excellent job of speaking for the supporters of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in particular, especially the Second Amendment and the issues about gun rights. But there was a caller who really rang a bell with me. And this is where this page is heading.
The thing is that we don't need to just focus on the Second Amendment, we need to make it an issue of the entire Bill of Rights. And secondly we need to make it simple. As you can tell by the other pages I have not cluttered things up with facts and figures and statistics, I write these by the seat of my pants and I do it because this is what I feel I should do. I don't have a lot of money and I can't buy my freedoms like so many have. I am not ignorant and I can hold a conversation on a fairly intellectual level, but I have kept these pages fairly simple for one reason, so that it can be understood.
Our Founding Fathers also believed in simplicity. How is this you ask? Our judicial system and all the laws are very complex. Well believe it or not there is a simple answer. Read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in particular. The Founding Fathers took their time when they constructed the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. It was done with painstaking simplicity for one reason, so that anyone who had any command of the English language could understand just what there governement was to be, and just exactly what their rights as a citizen were. They did this so that when the time came and the government started to fall into decay that the citizenry would know and could take proper action. The government would have you believe that the laws and your rights are complicated. The reason for this is quite simple also, they want to control you and have a stranglehold on our society. We are being subjected to a more tryannical rule of government with each passing day. The tactics in which our government deals with it's citizens is becoming more and more like a regime from the past, does Stalin or Hitler ring a bell?
Simply put the Constitution says in very clear and precise wording what our rights as a citizen are. I would like to spout some simplicity now. Simple truth is this that there is one reason why there has been no ruling on the Second Amendment by the Supreme Court. This simple truth boils down to two possiblities. Possibility one: The Supreme Court hands down a decision that the Bill of Rights is very clear and specific in that the Second Amendment does in fact include the everyday citizenry of the U.S. and all the gun control laws are unconstitutional and the law books have to be rewritten. Possibilty two: The Supreme Court hands down a decision that no the Second Amendment is not intended for the common citizens, and the citizens rise up in revolt against a tyrannt. Now here is the complicated part, does the Supreme Court uphold the Constitution and break down the stranglehold of their contemporaries, or do they stand with their counterparts and throw the country into a revolution. 2+2= duh?! You figure it out, I don't think you need to be a rocket scientist or a lawyer to do the math on this obvious no brainer.
The government is entrenching themselves into our lives with more and more laws that control what we can and cannot do, what we can and cannot have, and what we can and cannot believe. They are not only infringing on the Second amendment but the rest of the Bill of Rights also. If there is such a seperation of Church and State then how is it that the Supreme Court can hand down decisions on prayer. Isn't prayer a part of the free exercise of religion? How is this possible? Well there are so many people of so many faiths that the ruling on prayer will not throw the country into riots. But people don't see that it is UnConstitutional, the government is strictly forbidden to make any law regarding religion or the free exercise of that religion. Just one more finger around your throat in the government's stranglehold.