AGRI-TOURISM MASTER PLAN
(Year 2006-2020)
 |
6.0 DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES AND ISSUES
The issues and challenges that are
presented
here cut across other sectors and sub-sectors
and not only for tourism promotion
and agricultural
development because these issues and
challenges
are results of very recent planning
workshops
that included a general assessment
of the
Biliran situation.
6.1 Development Issues
Poverty
- Based on the 2000 survey, 34.8%or about 9,
975 families are considered poor.
They are
the families whose annual per capita
income
fall below the annual per capita
poverty
threshold
- Around 27% of these poor families live in
the urban area while 37.4 poor families
live
in the rural area.
- While the overall poverty incidence declined
from 39.6% in 1997 to 34.8% in 2000,
the
number of poor families in the urban
area
increased from 18.8% in 1997 to 27%
in 2000
while there was a remarkable decrease
of
poor families from 46.7% in 1997
to 37.4%
in 2000.
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold
and Poverty
Incidence of Population
Province of Biliran, Urban and Rural,
1997
& 2000
Province |
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threhold1 |
Magnitude of Poor Population2 |
Incidence of Poor Population3 |
(in pesos) |
(in percent) |
1997 |
2000 |
1997 |
2000 |
1997 |
2000 |
Biliran |
8,626 |
10,072 |
65,878 |
60,352 |
44.9 |
45.1 |
Urban |
8,682 |
9,914 |
9,208 |
13,061 |
24.6 |
38 |
Rural |
8,617 |
10,116 |
56,670 |
47,291 |
51.9 |
47.5 |
Source: National Statistical Coordination
Board
________
Note:
1. The annual per capita income required
or the amount to be spent to satisfy
nutritional
requirements (2,000 calories) and other
basic
needs.
2. The number of population whose annual
per capita income falls below the annual
per capita poverty threshold
3. The proportion of poor population
to the
total population.
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold
and Poverty
Incidence of Poor Families
Province of Biliran, Urban and Rural,
1997
& 2000
Province |
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold1 |
Magnitude of Poor Families2 |
Incidence of Poor Families3 |
(in PhP) |
(in percent) |
1997 |
2000 |
1997 |
2000 |
1997 |
2000 |
Biliran |
8,626 |
10,072 |
11,877 |
9,975 |
39.6 |
34.8 |
Urban |
8,682 |
9,914 |
1,417 |
1,931 |
18.8 |
27 |
Rural |
8,617 |
10,116 |
10,461 |
8,044 |
46.7 |
37.4 |
Source: National Statistical Coordination
Board
Employment
- The province has a total of 82,000 working
age population (15 years old and
above).
- Employment rate as of April 2003 has greatly
decreased from 95.0% in April 2002
to 85.1
in April 2003.
- Labor Force Participation Rate (LPFR) in
the province was placed at 84.8%
or about
70,000 as of April 2003.
Labor and Employment, Province of Biliran,
2002 and 2003
. |
April 2002 |
April 2003 |
Total Labor Force (in thousand) |
72 |
82 |
Labor Force Participation Rate |
76.8 |
84.8 |
Employment Rate |
95 |
85.1 |
Unemployment Rate |
5 |
14.9 |
Visible Underemployment Rate |
26 |
13.5 |
Source: National Statistical Coordination
Board
Labor Force and Employment Status of
Household
Population 15 years old and over Province
of Biliran 2000 and 2003 (in thousands)
. |
2000 |
2002 |
Total |
Women |
Men |
Total |
Women |
Men |
HH Population 15 years & over |
89 |
46 |
43 |
95 |
46 |
49 |
In the Labor Force |
47 |
23 |
24 |
70 |
29 |
41 |
Employed |
54 |
21 |
33 |
66 |
27 |
39 |
Unemployed |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
Source: Regional Social and Economic
Trends,
National Statistical and Coordination
Board
Family Income
- As of 2000, 76.91% of the families engaged
in entrepreneurial activities are
engaged
in agriculture as compared to year
1997 of
68.32% while there was a decline
of about
7% in the non-agriculture sector
of 23.02%
in 2000 and 30.95% in 1997.
- On the wage and salaries sector, there was
also a decrease of about 11.41%from39.91
in 1997 to 28.5% in 2000.
- There is also a remarkable shift under the
wage and salaries from agriculture
to non-agriculture
sector.
- On the other sources of income, there was
a slight increase of 2.85% from 1997
of 22.93%
to 25.78% in 2000.
Main Source of Income, Province of
Biliran,
1997 and 2000
Main Source of Income |
No. of Families |
1997 |
2000 |
Wage and salaries |
11,962 |
8,187 |
Agriculture |
6,310 |
1,576 |
Non-agriculture |
5,653 |
6,611 |
Entrepreneurial Activities |
11,134 |
13,073 |
Agriculture |
7,607 |
10,063 |
Non-Agriculture |
3,447 |
3,010 |
Other Sources of Income |
6,875 |
7,387 |
Source: National Statistics Office
6.2 Problem Analysis
(A clearer analysis is presented in
the SWOT Analysis)
Heavy dependence on agriculture of
the province
beset with low productivity is its
foremost
concern. The various factors that contributes
to the problem on low productivity
is as
follows:
- The major constraint to become productive
is capital. Lack of access to credit
among
the farmers/fisher folks and the
limited
investments from the private sector,
restrained
efforts to go into innovative and
more efficient
enterprises. This situation perpetuated
the
economy to be dependent on traditional
crops
such as palay, coconut and banana.
- Low income/savings from limited production.
This further led to limited capital
or limited
access to credit as many small farmers
are
considered credit risks because of
their
minimal net worth that can be pledged
as
collateral.
- Loose link between the research and educational
system and the demand for skilled
manpower
and better technologies also made
a significant
impact on the efficiency of the agricultural
sector.
- The deficiencies in skills, knowledge and
technologies in turn deplete the
capacity
of the resource to produce more or
regenerate.
- The capability of the government to deliver
basic services, facilities and policy
support
affected the investment levels, farm
technologies,
skills of labor and the depletion
of resources
of the sector.
6.3 Development Challenges
The province abounds with two very
important
resources, the human and natural resources
that are not effectively put to use.
The
main challenge that confronts the province
is in harnessing the full potentials
of its
people and its rural endowment to productive
use in areas where it has the potentials
and comparative advantage. These challenges
includes:
- Improving the productive capacity of the
agriculture sector along agri-processing
and non-traditional commodities;
- Shifting employment opportunities to small
and medium industries and the service
sectors;
- Expansion of the industry and service sectors
in the rural areas;
- Provision of cheaper and reliable power
to ensure that our abundant energy
resources
could be effectively used to attract
investors
into the province;
- Application of advancement in transport and
telecommunications as useful tools
in various
economic activities;
- Developing the skills of the human resources
to support the manpower requirements
of the
industry and service sectors.
 |
|
|