In the fall of 1998, I called Fred Dickinson, chief of police of Oak
Hill, WV, and asked him what he would do to an officer that was working
for him that was not doing his job on several instances but instead out
having sex with women (one of whom was my wife). He said it
depended on the circumstances and if it could be proven or not.
The conversation ended up with him stating that if it could be proven,
that he would fire the individual officer who was doing it. He
went on to say that if any of his officers were caught lying to him that
he would fire them for that infraction also.
I went to meet with Chief Dickinson the next day. He told me
what would be needed. The main thing that he wanted was a written
statement from my wife addressing my complaint against his officer.
He went on to iterate that if I filed the complaint and it was
dismissed, could not be proven etc. that the officer had a right to sue
me. He wanted me to know that his officer, RICK EDWARDS, was checking
into employment for another nearby city, BECKLEY, WV, for employment as
an officer. My take on it is that he was trying to appease me by
letting his officer go to another town for employment, the old
"pass the buck" routine. I took my wife up to meet with
Fred Dickinson and she told him the story. This was still not
enough to bring charges apparently against the officer. I hinted
at going directly to city council if my complaint was not addressed.
He said for me to give him a chance to handle the situation. I
took his word for it. After several days went by, I called the
officer's wife,Nancy Edwards, and told her of the situation. I
met her in town. I had brought my wife along. My wife did not know
where we were going at the time. Wife of suspect, Nancy Edwards, had brought a
picture of the police department and wanted my wife to pick out
her husband, as there seems to have been yet another officer going around town, having sex with woman, and using
the name of Rick Edwards. ( I am unable to verify this story as it was
told to me by wife of suspect, Nancy Edwards). At any rate, my wife was very upset at me
taking her to meet with Rick Edwards' wife but she did so. She was
able to pick out Rick in the picture and Nancy Edwards immediately began to cry.
I felt very sorry for her because I knew the hurt she was going through.
She talked with my wife privately for a moment and then went to confront
her husband, who was in traffic court that evening.
From what she told me the next day, at first he tried to deny it out
right. Then he tried to say it was before they were married.
Then she finally got him to admit to it. (or most of it). She went
on to tell me that she and Rick had been married in August 1995.
From the best I can tell, the affair with my wife and Rick started in
June/July 1995 and carried on through May/June 1998. In his own
words (as I have him on tape) they would meet while my wife was
working the midnight shift. On her lunch breaks they would meet,
have their fun, then go back to work. According to my wife, the
meetings would sometimes be by chance and sometimes they would be
pre-planned. Their favorite spot for their encounters would be a
public school yard by the name of ROSEDALE
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Also according to my wife, condoms were
used for each encounter. Rick denies buying them, to his wife, but
according to my wife, he provided the condoms. I really don't
think that we have received the whole truth on this matter. I
asked my wife what happened to the condoms after the INTENSE
encounter was over and she stated that he usually disposed of the
condoms by throwing them up on top of the Rosedale Elementary School gymnasium. At
later checking with the school custodian, used condoms have been found
on the school gym roof as well as in the school yard where the children
play during recess. (YUCK, sounds like a public health hazard to me).
Parents of the Rosedale Elementary School district should know about
this as their children were exposed to used condoms. There were also
meetings behind abandoned buildings in town etc. as well as many
non-sexual meetings throughout various places in town.
Now back to my complaint. I decided to call several of the city
council members and inform them of my complaint. I also played a
tape for most (if not all) of them. It was an audio tape of Rick
Edwards admitting to the deed while he was working. He goes on to say
that it should not have happened, it won't happen again. etc and so
forth. An "accident" only happens once in my opinion. Not
repeatedly for a period of almost 3 years. I think he just realized it
was a mistake after the woman he was cheating with told her husband (me)
and a complaint was filed. At any rate, after council heard my story, an
executive session was called of the council members. According to
my sources, Fred Dickinson was down playing my complaint and stating
that my wife kept changing her story. This was not the case,
however, and I nor my wife were there to be able to truly tell the
story. My wife never changed her story. Fred Dickinson was not
telling the truth if this is what he conveyed to the council members. At
any rate a while later, I was told that the officer had been suspended
for two weeks and was reduced in rank by one level. I was shown a
hand-written statement given by Rick Edwards, admitting to the fact that
he was doing this and would face any punishment deemed appropriate. It
was a couple of weeks after this that I found out that my original
complaint had been thrown out. Apparently all of the rules had not
been followed by Dickinson which allowed the punishment to be voided.
All I was told was that the board of peers (which officer Edwards agreed
to bypass) would be needed to rule on my complaint. Numerous reschedules
and delays later, a hearing was held in which my wife and I were called
as witnesses. A lot of questions about my complaint where asked.
Including a question as to whether I forced my wife to write the
statement or not etc. There was a lot of discussion and warning
about me confronting the officer and statements to the effect that I
would be in put in jail etc...... I told the "Board of
Peers" that I had audio tape of his admission. They did not
want to listen to it. My wife was asked questions about how did
she know he was on duty, etc. To me, if someone is in a marked
police cruiser, in uniform, and police radio on, the guy is usually on
duty, especially at 2 to 4 am in the morning. After months of
waiting A decision was made by the board that Chief Dickinson did not
follow procedure when investigating the incident.
This is such bull. If you ask someone did if they did it, they
admitted to it (even in writing) then you should be able to administer
punishment. Oh well. Guess they must have missed that fact. I was
told about one month after the fact by the chief that the charges were
dismissed but he said he would appeal it.
The appeal happened about 2 to 3 months later. In the meantime,
I called Dickinson, almost on a biweekly basis to keep a check on the
situation. He never once called me to inform me of what happened.
At any rate, some time in Dec 1999 the Civil Service Commission for the
city of Oak Hill decided to dismiss the charges against the officer.
I have not received written answer or copy of the dismissal, which by
the way I was supposed to get, from the chief. I guess they think
I will just go away now. I may not get the answers I want or the
punishment which he deserves but I can have a little fun myself by
writing these little expose' type stories about their antics.
There has been two murders that I know of in the wee hours of the
morning since I have filed my complaint. I guess they just need to
hire more officers (which they have done) in order to cover for
the ones that are off having sex when they should be working.
I forgot to mention the fact that Chief Dickinson opened up personal
files on some of the officers, showing me that he does discipline his
officers. This happened when I started to question his sincerity
about wanting to resolve this matter. One of the files that sticks
out in my mind is on Officer Akers. It was to the effect
that he got a suspension for being involved in an accident that involved
alcohol. The officer was given a 3 day suspension( to the best of
my memory) but was able to turn in vacation time for the suspension so
he would not lose any pay. (Man that sounds like a cush-cush
punishment to me). I think some of the other officers might take
offense to the fact that Chief Dickinson made their private personnel
files available for my viewing but again it may be that buddy system
thing working again. Also, according to my sources, Chief
Dickinson was just worried about conveying the fact that "It didn't
happen on my watch" to city council. I do want to thank Larry
Harding and Orville Thomas, who were on City Council at that time, for
doing the right thing and recommending that the offending officer be
terminated.
I tried to make this a matter of public knowledge but have been shut
down by the system other than word of mouth. The internet does
offer a potential for a large audience. I do think that this is a
story that should be known by the citizens of Oak Hill. After all, its
their dollars that goes to paying for the officer, council, etc. I
find it ironic that the city, in a sense, is "pimping out" so
to speak, its employees. After all they did pay at least one
officer while he was having sex with my wife.
We all have secrets. I guess it all just depends on how hard
some one else wants to hide secrets and how hard some one is willing to
work to find out these secrets (right FRED?). There have been
many, many, rumors and stories surrounding the Oak Hill Police
Department and all of the crap they dish out to citizens. An
amazingly high number dealing with sex, courting, cheating and the like.
If there was ever a need for a police chief that could keep the pants up
on his officers, this is one. Someday, there may be enough people
to stand up and say "Enough is enough.....We want better!"
Until then, there will be many people that have to put up with this
small town BS from the powers that be.