Brooklyn College

Core 1

Allen - not good
Benjamin- 5 - very good
Brockman - very good
Cooke - good
Eckert - good
Gutglueck - good
Harris, Ed - very bad
Harris, Elizabeth - Good -She gives 8 page research paper (difficult); It's also possible to get *EC* --- +5 on your GPA 
Hanson - decent guy, tough grader
Keizer - decent, but difficult tests
Koenigsberg - good (Though, I'm told very boring and not especially nice; If you don't go over to him after class and ask questions, it might hurt you)
McBreen - solid (whoops)
North - good
Sealy - good
Van Sickle - 5 - very good, fun class (I dunno how Thucydides can be fun)

TOP

Core 2.1

Glahn - good, very easy tests
Haggerty -5 - very good (Gives only final[120 points]. Just study notes he hands out and do sketchbook[You could get up to 25 points *EC* on the final]it's easy to get at least 15 for effort)
Koslow - very bad
Levine - 4.8 - very good
Meyardy - good
Oryshkevich - decent

TOP

Core 2.2

Blanche - 5 - very good
Cohen -5 Very Good
Cox -   very good
Guszki - 5- very good
Hedwig - bad
Janssen - good (teaches well)
Priest -good (nice, easygoing, good marker-During the term, he makes you learn to conduct[most don't learn]and he then tests you on it)
Shelden - 5 - very good
Taylor - good
Wilson - good (strict on attendance)

TOP

Core 3

Bashist - decent
Bermazhon - good
Bosket - 5 - Very Good (Easy)
Brown - very good, but demanding regarding reading
Charosh - boring and difficult
Condon - decent, lot of work
Currah - very good
Estee - 4.9 - Very Good 
Farber - 5 -very good - easy tests
Freeman - 4 - good
Golberg - 4
Green - 5 - Very Good (Doesn't show up to class a lot and the final was take-home)
Jayarama - very good (very interesting and easy)
Kahan - good
Koenigsberg - very bad
Kramer - good, very interesting and gives extra credit to help grade
Kraus - 1 - very bad
Miller - bad (difficult tests)
Moody - 5 - (very boring, but easy)
Narpay - 4 - good
Sandrale - 4 - (good)
Shortell - 1(very bad)
Squires - 4 -good
Weimer - 5(very good)
Verbit - tough but interesting

TOP

Core 4

Back - very good
Bartos - 5 - Very Good
Berger - good
Bridenthal - very good
Burrows - good, interesting, easy for the core
Dimitriyadu - bad
Frome - good
Hoffman-Strock - decent
Iacullo - good
Johnson - good
Johnston - bad
Katzman - bad
Killin - very good
Shaar - good and interesting
Solovyova - good and easy
Varga - very good

TOP

Core 5

Cohen - decent (very boring)
Halpern - good
Kimmel - 5 - very good
Liu - bad
Matei - good
Page - decent
Seidman - bad, 1 *SHC
Sibner - confuses himself and doesn't seem to know computers
Small - very good
Tannenbaum - good
Uckele - decent
Waraporn - bad/decent

TOP

Core 5.1 (same as CIS 1.0)

Dexter-3-decent, He answers emails within the hour.
Goldshmidt - 4.5 - only teaches what you have to know
Pacuit,Eric - might have changed since then, but was a clueless PhD student. Very easy A, very little work. You won't learn a blessed thing in his class - doesn't show up often, ends classes early, spends class time on stupidities that you don't have to know.
Yarmish-5-Very Good-Comes in with class planned out-take notes and study and you'll do very well on straightfoward midterms (Have to study labs and HW's too) Rated for core 5.1.
Zhou -1- very bad
Ziegler-1-Very Bad

TOP

Core 5.2
Cohen - Very Good (very boring but supposingly good)
Fein - 1 - Very Bad
Halpern - 5 - very good (easy tests)
Seff - 5 - Very Good (Nice frum Jew) Father of Yackov Seff.
Spears - 2 - Bad

TOP

Core 6

See English Teachers
Lang - 3 headed monster
Deaver - very bad, and possibly anti-semitic (I'd like a second opinion)
Gelber - gave low grades

TOP

Core 7.1

Abassi -3- decent (does not possess great teaching skills)-she has a foreign accent so make take a week to get used to
Evangelest - very good
Cohen - very good
Labianca - 4.9- Very good; Hard Tests - puts old tests on sale, though.
Moriber - good (Easy Tests)

TOP

Core 7.2

Bond - 5 -teaches history of atom bomb and teaches the speed of light. The way you tell which class he teaches when---the one earlier in the day is the speed of light.
Chen - Gives a point on GPA for each time you show up to class---sounds good
Kelly - good
Khotyanov - very good, though a bit boring
Lion - good
Liu - good
Singh - very good

TOP

Core 8.1

Eckhardt - 5 - very good (for internet course)
Blamire - very good, though he was cold toward me. Maybe because I'm Jewish? I'm not the only that thinks this. 
Crook - 5 - very good; she was helpful for core 8.1 as well as very nice. She was the lab instructor (Eckhardt was the lecturer).
Mcc entee - Somebody should gmail me a rating
TOP

Core 8.2

Aja - 1 - very bad
Chamberlain - 4 - good
Faqua - 1 -very bad
Kramer - 3 - decent
Leveson - 5 - for internet course. (rated well on ratemyprofessors.com) He's the best professor to take for core 8.2
Penna - 3 - decent 
Powell - 4.5 - Very Good
Prince - 3 -decent
Savage - rather bad, but tests are not hard
Seideman - 4.9 - Very Good

TOP

Core 9

Buncombe  - 1- very bad
Davies - 2 - bad, does not explain well, does not grade well
Hussein - 2 - bad, very boring
Lieman/Strong - good
Mbom - 4 - good
Nadal - decent, boring, but tests are multiple choice.
Oppenheim - 4 - good, but with a LOT of reading, and quizzes
Sharman - 5 - very good
Squires/Berkowitz - decent (Berkowitz is very good)
Thomas - very bad (gives bad grades)
Glasser - good
Verbit - decent to good

TOP

TOP