Genetics Quiz
- On your pedigree a chocolate bunny was bred to a lilac bunny the offspring of which was a blue. Is this Possible?
True/False.
- I bred a black to a REW and got a pair of lilac torts....is this the most recessive genes that you could possibly get?
True/False -
Breeding a seal to a himi is a good breeding combination.
True/False. - You will always know the genetic code of the rabbit by what he looks like.
True/False.
- I bred a chocolate otter buck (from black otter X opal breeding) to a blue doe (from a tort X REW) and got a blue, a lilac otter, and a black otter. I bred the chocolate otter to a REW and got a poorly marked black himalayan. Give me as much of the genetic codes of the chocolate otter and the blue doe as you can.
- A black bred to a black can give you a litter of black, blue, chocolates and lilacs in the same litter.
True/False.
- A REW out of a sia sable is the same genetically as a REW out of a self black?
True/False.
- You can tell if a black rabbit carries the chocolate gene by his appearance.
True/False.
- It is possible to get a REW out of opal X chestnut?
True/False.
- A rabbit that looks like a poor colored black is easy to determine what he is genetically.
Answers:
- False. A chocolate rabbit is [a][a]-[b][b]-[C][?]-[D][?]-[E][?]
A lilac rabbit is [a][a]-[b][b]-[C][?]-[d][d]-[E][?]
A blue rabbit needs the Black gene [B], neither the chocolate or the lilac has this gene to give to this blue bunny. However, in the real world a lilac can look like a blue, a blue can be so light as to look like a lilac..therefore, one of these rabbits in genetically NOT what he appears!
- False. A lilac tort has the full color gene [C] in the c position, a more recessive colored rabbit would be a REW out of a pair of lilac torts.
- True. That should give you 100% showable shaded rabbits.
- False. A black looks alot like a seal, a self chin also looks alot like a self black. A seal marten can pass very easily as a black silver marten. Although the seals or self chins, might look more like poor blacks. Only through test breeding can you be 100% sure, unless you have access to a DNA lab and lots of money to burn.
- The chocolate otter would be [a(t)][a] he produced several "self" rabbits, he had to pass on an [a] gene and since he himself is a tan, you know that he has to carry that [a] gene in order to pass it on. [a(t)][a]-[b][b] since he is a chocolate, he has no other possibilities for this spot. [a(t)][a]-[b][b]-[C][c(h)] since he is an otter, he is a full colored rabbit and since he produced a himalayan when bred to a REW you know that SOMEONE had to donate that himi gene and it ain't the REW! [a(t)][a]-[b][b]-[C][c(h)]-[D][d] since he helped produce "dilutes" or blues, but he himself is not a dilute...you know that he has to carry this gene. [a(t)][a]-[b][b]-[C][c(h)]-[D][d]-[E][?] Can't fill this one in FOR SURE, but breedings didn't not produce anything with the non-extension gene [e][e], but none of the does themselves could be considered good test breeders for this gene either. He could carry the [e] gene, the blue doe carries the non-extension gene, but 3 bunnies is not enough, you should get at least 8 bunnies from a breeding before you assume whether the animal is an [E] or an [e]. There was no non-extended rabbits on the chocolate otters pedigree, he himself is not a non-extended rabbit and never produced any non-extended offspring. It's almost...but not quite...safe to assume that this rabbit would be [E][E]. Breeding him to the blue doe a couple of more times would be able to prove one way or another.
The blue doe---The blue doe is a self rabbit [a][a], she also is a "black" rabbit, but since she produced a lilac otter when bred to a chocolate otter, you know that this blue doe carries the chocolate gene. [a][a]-[B][b] she is a "full colored" rabbit and since one of her parents is a REW you know that she has to have received a REW [c] gene from that parent. [a][a]-[B][b]-[C][c] and since blues are "dilutes" you know what goes in the "D" series. [a][a]-[B][b]-[C][c]-[d][d] the blue doe has a tort parent...the tort parent only has the [e] gene to pass on and since she herself is not a non-extended animal [e][e] you know that she at least has to carry it. [a][a]-[B][b]-[C][c]-[d][d]-[E][e] would be this does full genetic code...map out the codes for all the bunnies if you want...Email me your answers if you want me to check them for you!
- True. By getting all 4 colors in the same litter you know that both of the parents must carry both the chocolate and the dilute genes.
- True. A REW out of any self rabbit is the same genetically as any other REW out of a self rabbit...when a rabbit becomes a REW it loses it's ability to carry on any other genes in the "C" series except the REW gene.
- False. It's impossible to know what a rabbit carries just by looking at it, the only exception would be with the few genes that are incompletely dominant. A rabbit that is known as a chestnut could be carrying a lilac tort inside. each rabbit is carrying around 2 completely different sets of color genes, one that you can see (phenotype) and one that you can't see.
- True. By getting a REW out of ANY breeding, you know that each parent must carry the REW gene regardless of the color that it appears to be.
- False. A rabbit that looks like a 'poor black' may be just that a 'poor black' on the other hand, he might be a self chin or a seal. You just can't tell by looking at him.
Go to Story Problem quiz #2--The final exam.Back to articles page