|
What the nature of Mr. Christie's appointment from the committee
for managing the affairs at Lloyd's may be, we know not; but we
rather suspect he may have mistaken it; and we most sincerely thank
those gentlemen for the opportunity they have given us, in
furnishing a copy of that part of his letter, to ward off the blow
which his envenomed shaft was calculated to inflict. The liberality
and justice of the British underwriters is known and felt
throughout the universe, and will no doubt point out to them the
proper manner of proceeding, where the characters of individuals
have been maliciously, unjustly, falsely and wantonly misrepresented
by an agent of theirs. How Mr. Christie can reconcile
such conduct to himself, we are at a loss to find out: surely the
way to earn his salary from the committee, (for it is to be
supposed he has one,) is not by advocating cases against them,
which Mr. Fraser's certainly was, or by falsely representing others
who have happily succeeded in doing their duty. We shall do Mr.
Christie more justice than to suppose even he could believe, that
the salvage was to be borne by us, or that it made any other
difference to us, whether the underwriters or Mr. Fraser got the
proceeds, than the wish faithfully to fulfil our duty to those by
whom we are paid, and which, by the foregoing award, appears now at
least we have done.
(Note: The list of 185 persons in London, Liverpool and Dundee
entrusting Messrs. George & William Hamilton to look after their
interests is available on request, but not significant to the
present case.)
An apology for this lengthy statement, will not, we trust, be
deemed necessary, by the thinking part of our readers, when it is
recollected that the invidious attempt which has been made by Mr.
Christie to vilify our characters, has attacked us in those points,
which, we trust, will ever be considered of the greatest
consequence to British merchants - their honour and humanity. |
|