A n i m a l W r i t
e s
© sm
The official
ANIMAL RIGHTS ONLINE newsletter
Publisher ~ EnglandGal@aol.com Issue # 02/16/00
Editor ~ JJswans@aol.com
Journalists ~ PrkStRangr@aol.com
~ MRivera008@aol.com
~ SavingLife@aol.com
THE ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE ARE:
1
~ Science From The Heart by Marc Bekoff - bekoffm@spot.Colorado.EDU
2
~ A Guy Thing? Really? by
MRivera008@aol.com
3
~ BMP Gets Whales on U.N. Forum Agenda
4
~ Zebra Love from sdurbin@tulsa.cc.ok.us
5
~ Lawyers? Or Lawyer Friends?
6
~ Intriguing Recipe by Zerbeena@aol.com
7
~ Procter & Gamble Buys Iams and Eukanuba byKMBwolf@aol.com
8
~ Song For Baby Ruth by parogers@mindspring.com
9
~ Quote To Remember
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`
Science From The Heart
by Marc Bekoff
- bekoffm@spot.Colorado.EDU
from
Boulder Camera - February 13, 2000
"Back
off man, I'm a scientist." This bumper sticker has been percolating in my
brain for many years. Here's why.
Science
supposedly tells us why things are the way they are. However, science isn't value-free. Numerous prejudices are embedded
in scientific training and thinking. Scientists, as humans, have individual
agendas -- personal, social, economical, and political.
I'm
a scientist. I study animal behavior and am interested in the health and
integrity of individuals, populations, species, and ecosystems. I love what I do; it's fun. Because I have a
utopian dream of reconnecting humans with the souls, spirits and hearts of
other humans, other animals (anima = soul), and with inanimate landscapes, and
because I'm a sentimentalist, some think my science is flawed -- too
"soft," too subjective, not impersonal. I believe science should be
more open to individual's world views. There's so many diverse problems it's
unlikely there's only one sound scientific method.
Historically,
scientists have been placed on pedestals by non-scientists and scientists
themselves. Scientists were trusted, their autonomy and authority unquestioned.
Most worked in a safe, insulated microcosm. Those who questioned science were
considered anti-intellectual, perhaps Luddites. After all, scientists busily
discover cures for countless diseases, the structure of the human genome, how
to make weapons for global destruction, ways to get to the moon and elsewhere,
how to generate and process information faster, how to engineer better food,
how animals behave, and how nature works. Alas, how to make our lives longer
and presumably better. And indeed science has chalked up innumerable successes.
But it can do better.
Nowadays
more people, including some scientists, question science. Non-scientists are more aware and
inquisitive, but aren't anti-intellectual. Rather, many feel science hasn't
delivered. They're also concerned with the politics, economics (rush for
patents, financial gains), and arrogance of science. Indeed, scientists make
errors, and it's our fallibility that keeps science afloat. Increasingly
science isn't seen as a self-justifying activity, but as another institution
whose claims on the public treasury must be defended.
What
about science and nature? While we've learned much about nature, one reason
traditional science often falls short is that it fragments the world.
Reductionistic science dissects, disembodies, and splits wholes into parts. It
produces linear, mechanistic views of the universe and objectifies and devalues
animals and nature. Science reduces the dynamic multidimensionality of our
interactions with nature into static, dimensionless flatlands, rather than
stimulating the understanding and appreciation of variegated landscapes. However,
we aren't very good at reassembling wholes -- reconstructing Humpty Dumpty. We
often discover wholes are greater than the sum of their parts and we're unable
to understand how whole systems emerge from complex interdependent interactions
among their constituents. Laudably, the National Science Foundation now
supports a program in biocomplexity. Macroecology and the Biosphere project are
good examples of large scale holistic thinking.
Reductionist
science also misrepresents the world. This has serious consequences for the
quality of knowledge we gather and for how we interact in and with nature.
Reductionism promotes alienation, isolation, and disconnection. It forces a
separation between the seer and the seen -- a false dualism. Science often
makes nature less magical and impedes our truly sensing, feeling, and
understanding the scope of the amazing world within which we live.
Holistic
and more heart-driven science is needed, deep science that's infused with
spirit and compassion. Holistic heart-felt science reinforces a sense of
togetherness and relationship, family and community, and awe. It fosters the
development of deep and reciprocal friendships among humans, animals, and other
nature. It helps us resonate with nature's radiance and lessens our tendency to
think, egocentrically, that we're at the center of everything. Geologian (the
term means student of earths processes) Thomas Berry, author of "The Dream
of the Earth," stresses we should strive for a benign presence in nature.
Native Americans are proud to claim that "animals are all our
relations." Animals and inanimate landscapes need to speak for themselves.
Trees need love too.
I
often wonder what science might have become had its history not distanced and
elevated humans from nature. My own idealistic dream is to live in a world in
which humans perceive themselves as a part of nature and not apart from her, a
world in which humans whose spirits have been robbed or squelched by living
amongst steel, concrete, asphalt, noise, and a multitude of invasions of their
private space reconnect with other humans and raw nature - with the fragrances
of wild flowers, and the sounds, sights, odors, and touch of other animals and
inanimate environs; a world in which sensing is feeling. We're an integral part of nature, one with
nature, and have unique responsibilities to her. We must take care when we try
to redecorate nature. Nature has much to offer when we open our hearts to her
boundless and breathtaking splendor. She's our unconditional friend and reconnecting
can help overcome alienation and loneliness.
We
need to reinforce creative, passionate, and bold dreaming, and resist narrow
thinking that claims there's only one way to do "good" science.
Allowing individual idiosyncrasies, interdisciplinary collaborations, holism,
and heart to inspire science will make it more exciting, creative, attractive
to students. All scientists should be open to this. But some still resist the
notion that science is value-laden and some don't want to impregnate science
with feeling. Nonetheless, the Nobel prize winning geneticist, Barbara
McClintock, stressed that scientists should have a feeling for the organism
with which they worked, and she worked on corn!
Questioning
science will help insure that we won't repeat past mistakes, that we'll move
towards a world in which humans and other animals share peaceably the
beneficence of nature. Magnificent nature -- the cacophony of her deep and rich
sensuality -- will be respected, cherished, and loved.
Marc
Bekoff teaches in Environmental, Population, and Organismic Biology at
CU-Boulder.
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
A Guy Thing? Really?
by
MRivera008@aol.com
Ignorance
is one of the evils of our society. We
hear college-educated adults make racially insensitive jokes and we understand
that education is not always an antidote to ignorance.
However,
for the sake of homeless animals destined to die in our nations pounds,
ignorance about sterilization is insupportable. I guess being a female I am incapable of understanding the
reasons that some highly-educated and intelligent men exhibit totally moronic
attitudes when it comes to the sterilization of their male animals. If you have a friend or partner that refuses
to have his male dog or cat neutered, here is some ammunition for the argument
for sterilization.
As
a humane educator, I meet many responsible people who insure their animals are
vaccinated and medically treated when ill or injured. As an incentive to pet sterilization, government agencies sell
rabies tags for sterilized animals at a rate significantly lower than that
charged for intact animals. This proves
that we, as a society, are in agreement that we need to stop the overpopulation
of unwanted pets. When we bring this
fact to the attention of some male owners, however, we inexplicably get the
response that, “I couldn’t do that to him”.
Gary
and Jayne, some friends of mine, have a mixed-breed male dog. Gary is an attorney, presumably well-educated
and intelligent. During dinner one
evening, they discussed their dogs’ habit of running away, but rationalized
that it wasn’t really a problem since he always came back. I was surprised to learn that the dog was
not neutered. I offered that the dog
would stay home and not be contributing to the overpopulation problem if only
they had him neutered. To be sure, this
dog is running about the neighborhood mating with bitches in heat and
contributing to litters of unwanted puppies.
After
explaining the health benefits and social responsibility of male dog neutering,
Jayne declared “Oh, Gary is against that.
It’s a guy thing” Gary, with a
straight face and in all sincerity, agreed.
He “just didn’t think it was right”.
He allowed that my arguments were sound, but he just couldn’t bring
himself to do this “thing” to his dog, and wouldn’t allow his wife to take the
dog in for surgery either. In light of
the fact that I wasn’t entertaining the mountain-man character in Deliverance,
his statements seemed unbelievably absurd.
This
is not the first time I have heard this song and dance! I hear it over and over again from men just
as smart as Gary, and I don’t “get it”.
Women don’t seem to have this little hang-up when it comes to spaying
their female dogs and cats. They just
do it. So what’s this seemingly testosterone-produced point of view? Are men living vicariously through their
bitch-in-heat seeking mutts? Are they
projecting their own feelings of sexual prowess or failure through their canine
buddies? Would Sigmund Freud himself
have any enlightening thoughts were we able to present him with this very
strange phenomenon?
There
is no response that I can think of to the statement “I’m a guy, I couldn’t do
it to him.” This non-argument defies logic,
so cannot be adequately debated. A
gentleman recently brought to our clinic his best friend, an eight year old
Giant Schnauzer diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. The man wept openly for his friend who was
to meet death much sooner than necessary.
I couldn’t help but wonder how many times over the past eight years this
man had been urged to have his dog altered.
For reasons known only to him, he “just couldn’t do it”.
So
here are some facts about neutering:
*
Always done under a general anesthetic, neutering is painless.
*
Patients usually return to normal activity within 24 hours.
*
Discomfort is minimal; most animals don’t even require pain medication.
*
Altering animals virtually eliminates the risk of testicular cancer.
*
Unsterilized animals are more likely to be killed by cars as a result of
straying from home.
There
is nothing virile about a friend dying by the side of the road, having been hit
by a car; or having to undergo chemotherapy or, worse, dying of prostate or testicular
cancer before his time because his caregiver had some archaic hangups about
altering him. There is no shame in
crying in a vet’s office for a terminally sick friend, but how do you explain
to him that you “just didn’t think it was right” to have had a five-minute
surgery which would have avoided the sad ending.
Prostate
and testicular cancers are not the only risks eliminated by altering. Unneutered dogs also have a higher incidence
of perioneal tumors, venereal disease, transmissible venereal tumors,
prostatitis or benign prostate hypertrophy.
Why
put a friend at risk? Why not save his
life and make him happier and healthier?
A
frequently asked question is whether the neuter operation is similar to a
vasectomy in a human. It is not. A vasectomy
simply removes the route of testosterone to the penis; the testicles stay
intact, and testosterone continues to be manufactured and released into the
system. When an animal is neutered, the
testes are removed (orchiectomy). This
eliminates testosterone, and the animal no longer has the hormones that make
him want to breed. It is much kinder to
take away the dog’s urge to mate when he is unable to do so.
Personality
and behavioral changes, if they occur at all, are positive. Neutered males fight less with animals they
meet. Altered animals remain loyally
protective to their families because their home becomes more important to
them. New animals being added to the
household are more quickly accepted.
Some
may argue that only female dogs have puppies and therefore are solely
responsible for the pet overpopulation problem. “It’s not my pet having babies, it’s not my responsibility to
find homes for them all!” While female dogs and cats can only have one litter
at a time, male animals can impregnate many females every day. To those who respond “Atta boy, Rex!”; spend
a day at the euthanasia room of your local pound. Set aside a few hours, there are a lot of animals to kill.
But,
you argue, “but he never goes out”.
Please forgive the anthropomorphization, but, how would it feel to have
this incredible drive to procreate, to relieve sexual tension, but have no
outlet? Canines and felines have the same sexual drive that humans do, but they
can’t masturbate or practice family planning.
As a result, they experience incomprehensible frustration.
Another
favorite argument is “it’s not natural”.
Get real. Dogs haven’t been
“natural” for centuries. Are Boston
Terriers or Standard Poodles really “natural”?
Any resemblance to ancestral wolves has long been carefully and
profitably bred out of the domestic dog we know today.
A
guy thing? Really?
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
BMP Gets Whales on U.N. Forum Agenda
"People's
Resolution" could be the Turning Point.
After years of effort and negotiation, Breach Marine Protection has
finally got the great whales onto the United Nations Millennium Forum agenda.
The breakthrough came after the UN decided to hold a Millennium Assembly in an
effort to forge better links with its citizens.
A
proposal prepared by BMP to replace the current 1946 International Convention
on the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) -- with a Convention based on the
Conservation of whales and other cetaceans -- has been commended to the UN
Secretary-general, Kofi Annan. BMP believes that the massive world-wide support
for the now four year old 'People's Resolution on the Abolition of Inhumane
Commercial Slaughter of Whales' was a deciding factor. For years, the
International Whaling Commission (IWC) has declined to debate the 'People's
Resolution', little wonder as Secretary Ray Gambell has consistently refused to
place the 'Resolution' on IWC meetings schedule.
"We
are absolutely delighted that our Report has been recommended to the UN,"
said David Smith, BMP's Campaigns Director and joint coordinator (with Andy
Scollick) of the 'People's Resolution' from its inception. "So much hard
work from many quarters has gone in to formulating both this Report and
maintaining the 'People's Resolution'. This is great news for millions of
people around the globe."
BMP's
submissions are summarized in the UN Link 2000 report 'A UN for the 21st
Century' prepared by the UNGA-Link UK, and are placed alongside this Project's
recommendations on Human Rights, the Elimination of Poverty, Peace, Security
and Disarmament and Environmental Sustainability. The summary states:
"A
fundamental environmental fact is that human beings share the planet with other
living creatures and that life exists in a web of mutual dependency. We are
outraged by "man's inhumanity to man", and some of us no less so by
the inhumane slaughter of whales for commercial profit. Over ten million people
from forty different countries signed the People's Resolution to abolish this
slaughter of defenseless creatures in the natural world. Recommendation: The
United Nations should heed the voices of those millions of people and promote
an International Convention for the Conservation of Whales."
"If
Mr. Annan accepts our proposals we have the concerned international community
to thank; any victory for the whales will be their victory." said Smith.
"To all the individuals and organizations who have signed-on to the
'People's Resolution', BMP extents its heartfelt appreciation. This could be
one hell of a blow for
democracy," he added.
The
International Whaling Commission (IWC) currently operates on the 1946
International Convention on the Regulation of Whales (ICRW). Note the word
'Regulation'. This convention was formulated in the harsh days of post-second
world war. Because the populations of all whale species had been so depleted by
the greed of whalers -- some to the point of extinction -- regulation on the
numbers slaughtered, the type of killing gear used etc. was vital.
But
the intent of the ICRW was to regulate whale 'stocks', so that more whales can
be killed later. That is why the current world-wide Moratorium on whaling is
just that, a moratorium (temporary halt), not a permanent ban. Under the
'rules' of the ICRW, the IWC can lift the Moratorium whenever it pleases. That
Convention is now 54 years old, its 'rules' are not for the our world. Can you
imagine a 21st Century disarmament convention being based on 1946 weaponry? It
is also scientifically ignorant, e.g. in places the Convention refers to whales
as 'fish'! The ICRW's interpretation body, the IWC, is riven with politics and
self interest, consequently its rulings have little to do with whales.
The
Breach Marine Protection Report calls on the United Nations to replace the ICRW
with an ICCC, an International Convention on the Conservation of Cetaceans.
contact:
Breach Marine Protection
3, St John's Street
Goole
East Yorkshire
DN14 5QL
Tele./Fax: +44 (0)1405 769375
Mobile: 0973 898282
e-mail: BreachEnv@aol.com
'People's Resolution on the Abolition of
Inhumane Commercial Slaughter of
Whales': http://www.Breach.org (please note
our new website location).
United Nations: http://www.un.org
International Whaling Commission:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/iwcoffice/
Source: Breach
Env@aol.com
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
Zebra Love
Interesting
animal story in our local paper today. A man has a farm in a rural area north
of here where he keeps some exotic animals including a pair of zebras. (This would be central Wisconsin.) A neighbor woman got in the habit of
visiting and feeding carrots and treats to zebras and the other animals.
Well,
she was gone a few days, but when she came back for a visit she was met at the
gate by the man's donkeys and one of the zebras, but not the other. The one who
came (the female zebra) was very agitated and kept making this awful,
distressed noise. The woman went in the barn to find the male, but he was
nowhere to be seen. The female kept acting very agitated, trying to get her
attention.
The
woman ran outside, and the zebra came with her and started down a path. The woman ran down the path, and the zebra
kept running ahead and looking back to be sure the woman was following. The
zebra ran to the creek, which was mostly iced over, and started across. The
woman didn't want to go out on the ice, which was sure to be unsafe, but then
she saw the male zebra out there. He had fallen through and was trapped in ice
about up to his chest. He'd been flailing around and cut himself on the ice,
and was in desperate straits.
The
woman got people to come, and they attached a rope to the zebra, which
fortunately was wearing a harness. Somebody got on a cell phone and got a
neighbor to come out with his truck, which had a winch. They managed to pull
the zebra out and get him on solid ground -- he'd been mired in the mud of the
creek bed, so pulling him out was doubly hard. He collapsed and was able to do nothing
but shake, so they had to get a second truck out there that could lift him
aboard. Then they drove back to the barn another way, which really distressed
the female zebra.
They
got a vet there who stayed with the zebra until he warmed up and stabilized,
and he survived, much to the relief of the people and the female zebra, who got
lots of appreciation for her role in the rescue.
What
a good story about animals caring for each other, using their intelligence, and
communicating with humans! Thought you might like it.
Source: sdurbin@tulsa.cc.ok.us
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
Lawyers? Or Lawyer
Friends?
Are
you a lawyer, or do you have friends and family members who are? If so, please consider becoming part of the
Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) network.
And please forward this request on to anyone who could help.
Through
its Special Prosecutor Program (SPP), the ALDF provides experienced trial
attorneys who volunteer to handle animal cruelty cases for their local District
Attorney's office. ALDF is currently
working to expand the SPP program into major U.S. metropolitan areas. Your help is crucial!
To
learn more about ALDF programs, visit their web site at: http://www.aldf.org
To
work with ALDF in the Special Prosecutor Program, call Joyce Tischler, Dana
Campbell or Eileen Stark at 1-800-555-6517.
ALDF's snail mail address is:
ALDF; 127 4th St., Petaluma CA 94952-3005
Source: Artemisd123@hotmail.com
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
Intriguing Recipe
by
Zerbeena@aol.com
A
bizarre yet yummy meal: Stuffed mushrooms with papaya salsa and last minute
curried rice. Please, don't ask me how
I came up with this combination, because I've been questioning this myself!
Stuffed Mushrooms
Stuffer sized button mushrooms
Boxed Falafel mix (such as Fantastic
Foods)
Diced onions
Minced Garlic
Extra virgin olive oil
Make
falafel mixture according to package directions (which only requires adding
water), and set aside. The mixture has to sit for about 15 minutes. Preheat oven to 350 degrees.
Wash
the mushrooms and break out the stems, leaving the cap in tact. Scoop out any extra if you want more room
for the filling. Chop and smash the
stem parts, squeezing these bits in paper towel to extract as much liquid as
possible and place in a bowl. Add diced
onion and garlic to taste and place in bowl.
Add about an equal part of falafel mix to what's in the bowl and mix
well; using your freshly washed hands is the easiest. Wipe the mushroom caps with olive oil, and stuff them with the
mixture, packing it down, making the stuffing level with the top of the
mushroom. Either grill or brown the
mushroom tops (meaning stuffing side UP!) in a pan. Transfer the mushrooms when golden brown to a baking sheet and
place in the oven for about 45 minutes, lightly brushing the top of the
stuffing with olive oil.
Remove
mushrooms when the tops are browned and the falafel mixture looks kind of crunchy.
Papaya Salsa
Diced papaya
Diced sweet white onions
Minced garlic
Minced jalapenos
Chopped fresh cilantro
Red wine vinegar
Squeeze of fresh limes
Cumin or chili powder
Pinch of salt
All
of this is to taste, and you could coarsely chop all but the papaya in a food
processor. The salsa should be very
chunky and not like liquid. This salsa
should be good refrigerated for a day or two.
Last minute curried rice
Leftover white rice
Olive oil
Water or veggie broth
Curry powder
Parsley
Chopped green onions
Raisins
Put
a little olive oil in a preheated pan.
Add all ingredients (again, to taste) except raisins, making sure you
don't dump too much broth in so you don't have mush. Sauté for about 10 minutes or so until it seems the flavors and
liquid have been absorbed. Basically,
think of the texture of fried rice, and that's pretty much what you're aiming
for. Add raisins, mix, and then
transfer to a bowl, sprinkling more green onions on top.
Serve
each plate with a mound of the rice placing 2 or 3 mushrooms on top of the
rice. Put a generous portion of salsa
on top of the mushrooms, and Voila!
This can be served with either a side of green vegetables such as
spinach, chard, etc. with balsamic vinegar or a salad.
Bon
Apetit!
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
Procter & Gamble
Buys Iams and Eukanuba
by
KMBwolf@aol.com
As
of August 11th, 1999, Procter & Gamble purchased Iams for over $2.3
billion. "Iams is a terrific
business strong innovation, leading brands, global growth, talented
people," said Durk Jager, P&G's president and chief executive.
"It fits well with P&G strengths, including expertise in health and
nutrition. Iams will be an important contributor to accelerating our
growth."
Clay
Mathile, chairman and owner of The Iams Company, had to say: "This is an
exciting growth opportunity for our products and people because P&G
understands and respects Iams' mission, which is to enhance the well being of
dogs and cats. With P&G, we can
further advance that mission around the world."
Procter
& Gamble has already started one of the largest advertising campaigns Iams
and Eukanuba have ever seen, as managed by Saatchi & Saatchi. Television
commercials are on the rise, and pet supplies stores have been given special
in-store coupons specifically for Iam's customers, as well as sending
representatives to stores to train employees of P&G's goals for Iams, as
well as the benefits of the foods.
And
for the first time ever, Iams and Eukanuba dog and cat foods will become
available in grocery stores. Though the price will remain quite high as
compared to store brands, P&G is confident in higher sales.
With
this expansion of Iams, P&G has also marketed their other products in pet
supplies stores, such as the much debated Febreeze, and Swifter, a tile
"broom" for hair removal.
P&G
is treading on our territory. They have bought out the leading dog and cat food
company, knowing full well that many companion animal guardians are Iams' customers.
They have us locked in a corner: If we boycott Iams and Eukanuba foods, our
animals will suffer.
But
we will not let this be a victory for P&G. Instead, we shall show them that
they cannot beat our spirit. Letters and calls of disapproval must be sent to
P&G and Iams, as well as pet supplies stores supplying P&G's products.
We must tell merchants why we are upset. We must tell Iam's that we are
disappointed that a company that boasts caring for animals would be bought out
by the world's leading animal-testing company.
Procter
& Gamble might have Iams now. To
change that, let your voice be heard.
http://www.pg.com/cgi-bin/cgiCareers/pgnews/bin/list.cgi
http://www.pg.com/about/overview/facts.htm
P&G Contacts: Don Tassone -- (513) 945-8170
Linda Ulrey (513) 983-8975
Iams Contact: Bryan Brown 937/264-7416
The Procter & Gamble Company
PO Box 599
Cincinnati, OH 45201
The Iams Company
7250 Poe Avenue
Dayton, Ohio 45414
Phone: (800) 525-4267 - Fax: (937) 264-7264
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
Song For Baby Ruth
by
parogers@mindspring.com (Patricia Rogers)
"Does
cute things."
That's what
the lady wrote;
before she
died.
Three by five
cards.
After each
cat's name
she wrote a
description.
Baby Ruth.
Gray and black
tabby.
Female. Spayed.
Likes soft
food.
Does cute
things.
A letter
arrives.
Certified.
Sandy has
died.
At fifty-four.
Please, she
had asked.
Please promise
you will find
them homes.
They are old now
and they were
"hard to place"
when they came
to Sandy
So many years
ago.
Years of
walking
to the store
to get their
food
and litter.
Years of
carrying them
to the vet --
on foot;
or asking
someone
to drive her.
No car.
No license.
An ex who left
her
with nothing
but twenty
years
of promises.
No one ever
said
Sandy
did cute
things.
But she must
have once.
How else,
in the end,
thin and in
pain,
tired,
too tired
to talk,
could she have
carefully
added
to the
description
of the little
cat
"does
cute things."
(The Above Is
A True Story)
*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
Quote To Remember
"Custom will reconcile people to any
atrocity."
--George Bernard
Shaw, preface to Killing for Sport
«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»
Susan Roghair
- EnglandGal@aol.com
Animal Rights
Online
P O Box 7053
Tampa, Fl
33673-7053
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/1395/
-=Animal
Rights Online=-
Message
boards: http://www.envirolink.org/express/
Animal Rights
Resource Site
«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»
(Permission
Granted To Quote/Forward/Reprint/Repost This Newsletter In
Whole Or In
Part with credit given to EnglandGal@aol.com)
* Please forward this to a friend who you
think
might be
interested in subscribing to our newsletter.
* ARO gratefully accepts and considers
articles for publication
from
subscribers on veg*anism and animal issues.
Send
submissions to JJswans@aol.com