Return to Home page
This is why the police and the
CPS will not charge a police officer again when an innocent person is killed in
custody.
The jury can and will ignore a judge who tells them to give a Not
Guilty verdict.
When the evidence shows the police are
guilty
|
Jury gagged = Judges and Coroners tell the jury what a verdict will be
David Oluwale POLICE
GUILTY OF MURDER - 1969
The last
English police officers to be found guilty of murder of a man in custody.
(The law calls Manslaughter)
The Judge
ordered the jury to give a
'Not Guilty' verdict
But the Jury ignores the verdict the judge wants
2 Police officers found guilty for the death of Mr D Oluwale in 1969
Jury gagged = Judges and Coroners tell the jury what a verdict will be
Since
a jury ignored the judge and find two police officers guilty for the manslaughter of
Mr David Oluwale
There is strong evidence that 'Judges and Coroners' are
now carefully selected to prevent police being convicted
of a criminal offence when innocent people are killed in police custody.
-
Many cases show the 'Judge and coroner'
tell the jury what the verdict will be
-
or what verdict to consider and the
verdicts the jury cannot consider.
-
-
Juries are gagged what to say when
giving a verdict.
-
-
In at least four cases the jury is told 'NOT
TO CONSIDER A VERDICT OF UNLAWFULLY KILLED.'
The coroner and Judge tells the jury what verdict to give.
A Long list
of the law protecting the police. Just a few cases
I am the judge ---- I am the judge ----
I can quash any
---- inquest 'Jury verdict of 'Unlawfully killed' ---- against any police officer.
Who do these families think they are. I am the judge,
The Jury will do what I say
JUDGES WILL REVERSE AND QUASH AN UNLAWFULLY KILLED VERDICT
But have NEVER GIVEN AN UNLAWFULLY KILLED VERDICT when the Inquest jury
find the police are not to blame for a 'Death in custody'
James Ashley
Judge Rafferty ....
instructed
the jury .... to return a not guilty verdict.
Christopher Alder
Mr Justice Roderick Evans
instructed the jury .... to acquit 5 police officers of manslaughter and neglect of duty.
Leon Patterson
To stop police being charged. The 'Inquest
jury'
were told by the coroner
that Neglect' should not be added to the
verdict ------But the jury rejected this advice.
Harry Stanley To stop police
being charged
-
The High court judge 'Sitting alone' ignored all the evidence
against the police who shot and killed Mr Stanley
-
and just quashed
the 'Inquest jury verdict' of 'Unlawfully killed'
-
and refused permission to appeal against his biased decision.
Dennis Stevens
To stop police
being charged The Coroner
told the inquest jury
they could only choose between accidental death or open verdict . The
coroner
would not allow Unlawfully killed to be considered
Roger Sylvester
To stop police
being charged
The High court judge 'Sitting alone' ignored all the evidence
against the police and overturned the 'Inquest jury verdict' of unlawful killed,
partly because
(he said) the jury
had been misdirected by the coroner.
John Leo O’Reilly To
stop police being charged
The Inquest jury
were told by the coroner
to return a verdict of accidental death. This
BIASED UNJUST VERDICT was QUASHED
and an
'Open' verdict was given at the second inquest
Glen Howard
To
stop police being charged
In a travesty of justice ....The Coroner 'Instructed' the jury
not to consider a verdict of 'Unlawfully
killed and told
the jury to give an
'Open or accidental death verdict
Unwritten English law
I am the judge ---- I am the judge ----
- and I will
quash any inquest
jury verdict of 'Unlawfully killed against any police officer.
- Who do these
families think
they are.
-
- Don't the families realize
the law must protect the police. ----
NOT THE VICTIM
I am the judge
This
cartoon is not meant to be funny- It shows English law as it is - Corrupt

Lord Goldsmith QC Attorney General
There are certain
principles on which there can be no compromise.
A fair trial is one of those
in accordance with International standards.
Hollow
words when
Inquest jury verdicts of 'Unlawfully killed'
are overturned by 'One High Court Judge
Sitting alone'.
How are 'Coroners and Judges' selected to judge 'Inquests
and in the Crown Courts' for cases of deaths in custody?
-
JUDGES AND CORONERS
ignore the
justice system, ignore expert evidence
-
-
Judges TELL A JURY WHAT THE VERDICT WILL
BE - Which
is 'UNLAWFUL that is
why we have a 'JURY' to stop interference from judges
-
They
should be charged with 'Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice'
|
The PCA and the CPS should never be the prosecuting authority for
deaths in custody
For years in every death in custody the CPS will prevent any
inquiry and never charge any police officer with an offence.
- The CPS infamous statement 'as always is'.
- There is no evidence to charge any police officer with
an offence.
- (No matter how overwhelming the evidence is and how many independent
witnesses there are)
- 17 May 2000
In the Royal Courts of Justice the Lord Chief Justice ruled that the decision of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP)
NOT to commence any criminal proceedings against any of the prison officers involved in the restraint related death of black prisoner Alton Manning at the private Blakenhurst Prison on 8 December 1995
was unsustainable in law.
Lord Justice Rose
accused the CPS of taking a "flawed approach" in its decision
not to prosecute four former members of the West Midlands Serious Crime Squad.
In the case of Derek John Treadaway
Fancy phrases the CPS ignore time and time again
The CPS will not want a guilty
verdict
Police - PCA - DPP - CPS corruption and/or criticized
which
clearly shows England is a police state and the law in England is nothing to be
proud of.
- 9 June, 2004
Evidence was tampered with by police to back
up the theory that Michael Menson killed himself.
Two serving junior officers will be admonished. but seven
others, including
two of the most senior involved, face no action
as they
have left the force.
(No
doubt on full pensions)
- The inquiry also found that despite evidence to the
contrary, the Met insisted for 18 months that Mr Menson, who had a
history of mental illness, had set himself alight
and altered witness
statements to back this theory.
Judge Crush returned to outline his reasons for stopping
the case.
His 42-page judgment
was a scathing attack on the CPS and the police operation.
Judge Crush's judgment identified five key issues,
including:
• "Prosecution misbehaviour" symptomatic of "a culture of non disclosure".
•
1,700 pages of "significant" police
documents not disclosed to the defence.
- Judge Gerald Butler
has criticized the Crown
Prosecution Service (CPS) for failing to take action over a number of ....
'Deaths in police custody.' .... Judge Gerald Butler attacked the
agency's decision making system.
He also called for the CPS to give serious consideration to publishing its
reasons for deciding not to prosecute police officers in cases involving
deaths in custody,
especially where an inquest jury had returned
a verdict of unlawful killing
Who else in England can defy a judge?
- Only the CPS
Three times High Court judges have ruled that the
CPS
decision not to prosecute [police officers] is unsustainable in law,
after an
unlawful killing inquest verdict, and
four times
the CPS has refused to prosecute,
most recently on 1 June 2001.
and
now on 17
July 2006 the
CPS refuse to prosecute the police who shot Jean Charles de
Menezes
Lord Justice Rose
accused the CPS of taking a "flawed
approach" in its decision not to prosecute
four former members of the
West Midlands Serious Crime Squad.
Lord Justice Rose
and Mr Justice Jowitt quashed the DPP Dame B Mills
decision and invited her to reconsider whether all or any of
the police officers should be prosecuted.
July 24,
2001
- The official
police watchdog condemned Scotland Yard
for keeping
secret the punishment it had imposed on an officer who destroyed two pages
from his notebook relating to the death of Mr Sylvester in custody.
This
is why many people and world organizations say the PCA is corrupt and protects
the police from being charged) January 1999 Roger
Sylvester died after being restrained by eight officers outside his house so
it is over 4 years for Roger's family to see someone held responsible for his
death after the PCA and the CPS
refused to bring any charges against the police officers.
13 January,
2000 -
European Committee for the
Prevention of Torture, says
the existing
(PCA) Police Complaints Authority appears ill-equipped to act
as an independent watchdog.
The Strasbourg-based committee claims there
are "serious questions" about the
independence and impartiality of the procedures used to process
complaints about police misconduct.
The court found Dame
Barbara Mills QC former DPP Director public prosecutions
Head of the
CPS former director of public prosecutions
had acted unlawfully in deciding there was insufficient evidence to
prosecute police officers in two cases of deaths in custody of
Shiji Lapite and Richard O'Brien and Derek Treadaway,
who confessed to robbery after being tortured by the police had been awarded
£50,000 compensation by a
high court judge who described his treatment as
"nothing less than torture". No
police charged with any offence
6 March,
2000 Last week, the CPS
Inspectorate published a report entitled 'The Thematic
Review of the Disclosure of Unused Material'.
In a survey of 631
cases, the Inspectorate found that evidence written on 1 in 3 police forms
was in insufficient detail or omitted.
And a survey of barristers last year
by the Criminal Bar Association and The
British Academy of Forensic Sciences discovered over 200
cases involving problems of disclosure.
29 March, 2000
John Woodruff and William Hickson
Judge Geoffrey Grigson
has
ruled that their case was "permeated by the stench of police
corruption"
17 May
2000 - Amnesty International -
The present system, with police officers
investigating alleged crimes of their colleagues, cannot guarantee thorough,
impartial and independent investigations.
-
The fact that the Crown Prosecution Service
(CPS) decides whether to bring criminal charges against a police officer
- In a
'Death in custody' case on the basis of such an investigation
poses
serious doubts as to the impartiality and independence of such
decisions.
- (So
many people know this and the CPS are therefore responsible for bringing
English Law into disrepute)
2000
CPS
Wanted to convict this innocent man
Ben Lovejoy was knocked OFF his
motor cycle by a van.
Police recommendation to
prosecute the van driver.
But CPS prosecuted
............ Mr Ben Lovejoy
.............. [the
motor cyclist]
When the police
said they would give evidence against the van driver,
who the police
report of the accident indicated was at fault, not Ben Lovejoy.
Then the CPS withdrew the charges against Mr Lovejoy
Young black man
Delroy Hylton was
attacked
by police
as he lay
helpless in the back of a van, hands cuffed behind his back.
Hylton's 'crime' had been to
protest at the brutal arrest of his
neighbours.
But then he, too, was assaulted, arrested, detained,
fingerprinted, then charged with affray and obstruction.
Charges
thrown out when the case against his neighbour, David Charles,
collapsed
WPC Gillian Pattinson did nothing to stop the attack on Delroy
Hylton or help him as he screamed in pain. She also failed to report the
assault.
She is still a WPC.
PC Mark Astley who attacked Mr Hylton
was allowed to resign on a full pension before any disciplinary action was
taken and not charged in court with any offence.
28 April
1999 The lack of information before inquests has been a
long-standing complaint of relatives, who say it makes it difficult for
lawyers to challenge the police version of events or question their
actions
13 May 1999
- The Director of Public Prosecutions David
Calvert-Smith .... has said there is a growing risk of miscarriages
of justice in England and Wales, because evidence is being withheld from defence
lawyers in criminal trials.
David Calvert-Smith's remarks
coincide with a British Academy of
Forensic Sciences survey of barristers, which seems to confirm his
fears. Report below
June 10 1999
Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) highlighted one case where two constables used their batons to
restrain a young man they claimed was drunk and violent.
A video tape discovered later showed the man was walking home quite innocently
when
the officers called him over to their car and squirted his face with a water
pistol.
This is
called "trawling the
margins" to improve performance figures.
Aug 1999
A report by the European
watchdog on torture and degrading treatment found that
NO ONE in the CPS including the DPP Dame
B
Mills, wanted to take
responsibility for the decision not to prosecute in the
O'Brien and Lapite
cases.
(So
a death in police custody is not serious enough for her to look at it
personally)
15 Jan 1998 Home Affairs Select
Committee's recommendations, major changes in the police complaints
procedure are likely. Allegations of corruption and
dishonesty against police will be handled more quickly under proposals
announced by MPs. The committee also wants rules to be tightened to stop officers under
suspicion from wriggling out of hearings by claiming illness. IT WAS 2004
BEFORE SOME OF THESE RECOMMENDATION WERE CARRIED OUT.
May 20, 1998 Ministers were deeply
embarrassed at the CPS's failure to launch prosecutions over deaths in police
custody and MPs delivered a number of reports slamming the service's operation
and bureaucracy.
23 July 1998 - CPS withheld
evidence from the defence council of Oliver
Thomson. The judge said the CPS's ... "error" was "totally
unacceptable".
Judge Barrington Black
ordered that the government prosecutors to pay £5,000 towards the costs of
what he called an "horrendous episode
in the courts of justice
31 Aug
1998 Police and CPS withheld video
evidence that proved Brent Reid an innocent man was convicted and
jailed. Brent Reid was released
when specialist solicitor Kevin
Thomlinson proved corrupt 'West Mercia
police' withheld the evidence. The CPS has also never forwarded the
video tape to Mr Kevin Thomlinson only told the solicitor what was on the
video.
16 October 1998
Speaking at a Police Complaints Authority conference in
London
Alun Michael a government minister
said senior officers could not routinely use the possibility of prejudicing
criminal, civil or disciplinary proceedings as an "excuse to hide behind"
when faced with bereaved families' requests for information.
November 2, 1998
Police corruption probes in 19
forces.
Nearly half of all police forces in
England and Wales have officers facing charges of corruption or dishonesty,
according to a survey by The Times newspaper.
Altogether
105 police officers in 19 out of 43 forces are under investigation. They include high-ranking officers such as superintendents and detective chief
inspectors. London's Metropolitan Police has by far the greatest problem with
51 officers suspended.
15 December 1998
Sir Paul Condon,
believes that up to 250 of his officers
are corrupt.
Fifty officers have already been suspended
and 20 charged
as part of Sir Paul's purge against dishonest or
"bent" officers.
22 December 1998
Pc Kim Burgess and PC Ian Hill Both officers
were convicted of perverting the course of justice by falsifying pocket books and witness
statements.
PC Hill was found guilty of causing actual bodily harm to Mr
Overy, who was cut and bruised, and causing grievous bodily harm and unlawfully
wounding to Mr Rutherford, who broke his neck and needed
stitches.
10 December 1997
ALLAN Cook 19yo student at
Kingston University was assaulted and
badly beaten up for no reason by two
officers from the Metropolitan police.
Mr Cook was
charged with grievous bodily harm and seriously assaulting a WPC police
officer.
7 December 1998
Mr Cook
was acquitted
after an
embarrassing video a CCTV video from a jeweller's shop near the scene of the
assault showed Allan Cook nervously moving away from the police in exactly the
way he described making nonsense of the police story and the
charges were dropped.
As usual ....... No police charged with false arrest or grievous
bodily harm or serious assault.
The
Ombudsman found fully justified the complaint by
the family of Mr Kenneth Severin,
who died while on remand in HM
Prison Belmarsh,
that the Prison service (PS) had not made the internal
investigation report available to them before the inquest into his
death.
Detective Inspector Stuart
Lewis, and other South Wales police officers have
taken early retirement on full pension despite a catalogue of complaints
against them.
June, 1991, 39 members of the National Union of Mineworkers
collectively settled their action against the Chief constable of South
Yorkshire police for a total of £425,000.
THEN PEOPLE SAY
WE HAVE THE BEST POLICE
FORCE IN THE WORLD ---- IF WE HAVE -----
IT'S NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF
***=============================================***
Unlawful
act/constructive manslaughter
- A
defendant is guilty of this sub-category of manslaughter if he
intentionally does an act which is unlawful and dangerous which
inadvertently causes death
(DPP v Newbury [1977] AC 500 HL)
- It is not necessary to prove that the unlawful and dangerous act
was aimed at any person, or in particular the person whose death
was caused
(R v Mitchell [1983] QB 741 CA)
- Neither
is it necessary to prove that the defendant knew that his act
was dangerous or unlawful
(Newbury) and (R v 0wino, unreported 13 March 1995)
- For
an act to be unlawful within the meaning of this rule, it must
be criminally not merely civilly wrong
(R v Franklin (1883) 15 Cox CC 163)
- 'Danger'
is determined objectively. The act must be such that all sober
and reasonable people would inevitably recognize that must
subject the other person to at least the risk of some harm, even
if not serious harm
(R v Church [1966] 1 QB 59)

Next page - Corrupt Police and CPS
To
Home page