MessageID: 3t1n2i$80k@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu#1/1
references: <3spmjh$m0k@mordred.gatech.edu> <DAvxFt.2ts@freenet.carleton.ca> <3ssfnc$27r@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <DAy2Fw.8os@freenet.carleton.ca> organization: State University of New York at Buffalo/Computer Science nntp-posting-user: pck newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.saturn In article <DAy2Fw.8os@freenet.carleton.ca>, Russ Renaud <ae517@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote: >Oh! The Consumer Report! Yes, and what did they say recently about >the Saturn in comparison to other similar-priced automobiles? If memory >serves correct, it was in the middle-of-the-pack. Hmmm... you should check out the repair records in the 1995 Consumer Reports Buyers' Guide; my admittedly hasty look at the Saturn ratings saw top ratings in all categories except for body integrity and something else (electrical?) in the 92 and 93 models. Looks quite above middle of the pack to me. What issue are you referring to? I'd like to check it out. >The price is in the ball park, they have shown some good, innovative ideas, >but the quality control is lacking compared to the offerings of other >maufacturers. Hmmm... lacking compared to Honda perhaps, but I'd hardly call that lacking... > > Ah, but one post from you means we have the truth now, right? > > >Just look at the nature of other postings on this newgroup; it gives an >indication of the type of problems owners continue to encounter. True, but take into account that upset people like to bitch while happy people are usually quiet, or don't take the trouble to respond to such things. Check out any name brand personal computer group, and you'll see the same thing. Judging from those newsgroups I should never buy any brand of computer ever! They all break down! > > >> >>Hastily donning my asbestos skivvies, >> >> I'd reccommend you don your thinking cap before you post next time. > >I'd would recommend you open your eyes and have an open mind. Having an open mind doesn't mean believing whatever anyone says, especially with nothing to back them up.