Re: I Want a Saturn SC2 But. . .

From: goodwin@smcvax.smcvt.edu (Dave Goodwin)
Date: 1995/07/14

MessageID: 3u4gds$u1d@mustang.smcvt.edu#1/1


references: <3s0mr3$8cl@news.service.uci.edu> <3sfss4$b98@newsbf02.news.aol.com>,<3t3ng6$f1a@alaska.nwlink.com>
organization: St. Michael's College
reply-to: goodwin@smcvax.smcvt.edu
newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.saturn

In article <3t3ng6$f1a@alaska.nwlink.com>, bgillam@nwlink.com (Bill Gillam) 
writes:
>bfang@aol.com (BFang) wrote:
>
>>Don't buy the Saturn
>
>Or the bullshit from whining posters.
>
>

For the benefit of the original poster, I'd highly recommend Saturn.  I was
very happy with the way my purchase was handled, the courteous, professional
nature of the sales and service staff, the speedy delivery of a car right off
the line, the preparation of the car when delivered, and the driving experience
to date.  I have a '95 SC2 in the Black Gold trim with all the options except
the sunroof.  It's one sharp looking car, was delivered with only 1 minor
assembly defect (a misplaced strip of cushioning material), and has performed
flawlessly so far.  The 5-speed manual with the DOHC engine provides more
than enough acceleration and mileage has been excellent even though I've 
driven mostly in-town so far.  I test drove several other vehicles, including
a Dodge Stealth, Avenger and Intrepid, the Mitsubishi Stealth equivalent,
the Mazda Miata, and looked briefly at some Honda and Toyota models,  I felt
the Saturn was easily their equal given what I considered to be a bargain
price.  Sure, the Stealth was more exciting to drive, just as it would have 
been more exciting to insure!  Adding the Saturn affected my insurance to
a much lower degree than I expected, given that it's full-coverage with a
low deductible.

So far, I'm one happy owner.

Dave


1