WICKMESH

What is Wickmesh?
Wickmesh is my PC, an AMD K6-200 with 64MB RAM and 8.3GB HDD. It now runs 9-T-Dive (Win95) for most of the time, but I've kept my old Dos 6.22/Win3.11 dual boot setup for when 95 gives up the ghost. Wickmesh is also me in a way, as it's grown to be my email alias - most of my email addresses are wickmesh@some-isp-or-other.

Why "Wickmesh"?
"Mesh" because it's a Mesh PC, and "Wick" because purchasing it has taught me to never trust anything promised by anyone representing Mesh Computers PLC! ("Wick" is derived from the never-said-nowadays word "wicked", once meaning "excellent", but now suggesting something undesireable and of poor quality...)

What's wrong with it?
It's more a case of what was wrong with it, because it's now long out of warranty and I've upgraded it; it was an AMD 486 DX4/120 with 8MB RAM and a 1GB HDD when I bought it in early 1996.

So what was wrong with it? Why wouldn't I buy another one?
It's a long story; a catalogue of poor service and one incompetent engineer. For example, when it first arrived, the CD software pack was missing (I got it only after my solicitor wrote to Mesh), and once plugged in, it booted once and then failed. I returned the base unit for repair, and was without it for over 2 weeks. It was returned working (after lots of phone calls), but it didn't stay working for long.
When the hardware worked, it was a good computer, hence why Mesh machines always do really well in magazine tests. BUT when (not if) it went wrong, it took so long to get it fixed that it barely seemed worth the trouble. To be fair, my circumstances didn't help - then being a student, I moved around the country a lot, I didn't have my own phone at University, and Mesh no longer sold the model I bought. But how many bloody times did I have to tell them over the phone that I was not at the address I was last year? And then why did the parts and engineer go home (Kent) rather than to Salford as I asked? Why did the thing seem to almost always have something wrong with it and if not, why did it keep on going wrong?
I learnt never to believe what I was told by Mesh. Every single time I spoke to a Mesh employee I would be given another excuse. I don't think I have enough digits to count the number of times I was told I would be "called back" - and I can remember no more than three times when I actually was. Over the 2 years of my warranty (the second given free for the trouble I had gone through) there were three different maintenance engineer companies. Most engineers who visited were OK, but one (who broke the hard drive) actually needed my help to install the motherboard! The maintenance companies generally were helpful - it was Mesh that was stalling them by not supplying the parts.

The last major problem I had was with the motherboard, CPU fan, and CD-ROM. The motherboard had been replaced with the wrong part previously and now had a dodgy system clock (lost and gained time for no reason), the CPU fan had sand for bearings, and the CD-ROM got out it's skipping rope every time you tried to play an audio CD. I made an initial phone call on 8th January 1997 to report it, but as usual there was no-one available to talk to me. I got called back (unusually) on the 14th of January and reported the lot. It took until the 8th May 1997 for it to be fixed, during which time one visiting engineer damaged the hard drive meaning that had to be replaced as well. That's four months. Four Whole Months.
Now under warranty the parts are supposed to be replaced by exact or better specification replacements. This was one reason for the final motherboard replacement, as the third board I had was a mini one with less SIMM, ISA and PCI slots than it should have had. The replacement Fujitsu mode 4 hard drive, replacing what was an excellent Seagate mode 4, has an access time of something close to 10 years (I won't repeat here what I call it). Not what I call same specification, but by then I was so fed up with Mesh by then that I simply accepted it. Fortunately, I have had no need to contact them again.

How many parts have I had? Now this is funny.

  • 4 Motherboards (that it booted from at least once). 2 dead 486 boards, 2 Pentium boards brought by engineers as well, even though I told them that I had a 486.
  • 3 Floppy drives.
  • 2 CD-ROMS (plus 1 dead brought by engineer).
  • 2 Hard Drives.
  • 2nd set of 8MB memory.
  • 4 CPU Fans (plus 2 Pentium CPU fans brought by mistake).
  • 3 Motherboard batteries (plus 1 external battery).
This is over a period of 17 months; the final seven were problem free, although the second CD-ROM started to misbehave in early 1998 (but it's still just about going, installed in my parents computer).

But I'm not alone.
I'm not, as you may think, an isolated case. I was contacted by another Mesh customer, who ran a site full of the experiences of other Mesh owners - Mish Mash Mesh. That site's now gone, but I've found another disgruntled Mesh customer on the web - The Ingham Report.

And there's more. The following graph is reproduced from page 37 of May 1998 Computer Shopper UK; the first page of the Dan advert.

PC Pro Graph from Dan advert
Note not only that Mesh are near the bottom (although there are many other manufacturers missing from the graph who may or may not appear lower) but they have the second largest proportion of "No" responses (second only to Tiny) of over 30%! In the other graph shown in the same Dan advert, Mesh do not appear.

Also, I have finally reproduced the article from the Daily Mail. It was faxed to me at the time and is now rather faded, thus the picture is not too good. The date of the fax is 14th March 1996, and the article concerns a Mesh customer who had to use their credit card company to get their money back.

Any other disgruntled Mesh customers out there? Mail me!

A Footnote to Mesh
If Mesh does not like what is written here, then I invite them to produce evidence to the contrary (note evidence, not excuses). I have written about what I have experienced. If Mesh wish to change the opinion of their customers they must produce more reliable machines, and provide sufficient and competent enough support staff and engineers to deal with any problems efficiently, promptly and politely. It has been proven that it costs 10 times more to attract a new customer than to keep an existing one, and Mesh seem to have no idea about this.


| Home || Robot Wars || Land Rover || Honeysuckle Weeks || E-Mail |
1