TENGWAR MODES

When speaking about tengwar, the writing characters created by the Elves, two kinds of modes may be distinguished: tehta-modes, where vowels are represented by tehtar, or diacritics above, below and sometimes inside the tengwar, and full modes, which have a separate tengwa, or character, for each vowel. The use of diacritics for non-vowel functions, such as indicating a preceding homorganic nasal or the doubling of consonants, or the "s-curls" attached to tengwar, does not serve as a distinction between tehta- and full modes.

Furthermore, when a tengwa mode is employed for a modern language - as opposed to its use for Elvish, Black Speech etc. - one must distinguish between phonemic modes, having ideally one tengwa or tehta for each phoneme of the language, and orthographic modes, which represent by each tengwa or tehta one graph (written symbol, or "letter") of the language, or possibly a digraph or trigraph (fixed combinations of letters, such as English th or ch).

TOLKIEN'S TENGWAR MODES

This paper proposes to analyse a limited subset of tengwa-texts, or specimina: those written by J.R.R.Tolkien's own hand in Modern English, as opposed to those in languages of Middle-earth or other Mannish languages, such as Old English or Latin (instances of which do exist), and employing a full mode. Even within these limits there exist several texts, listed below. Each is designated by a name for ready reference (thus one may speak of the "Mazarbul-mode" or the "Bombadil-II-mode") and its DTS number, from the Mellonath Daeron Index of Tengwar Specimina. The dates attributed to specimina are in many cases only approximations based on the best educated guesses.

FULL TENGWAR MODE SPECIMINA

COMPARISON AMONG MODES

The full table shows  the usage for each particular mode, including all tengwar employed, noting also the occurrence of underposed dot for schwa, superposed double dots for -y and tilde for -w, abbreviations with extended telcor for the, of, of the, s-curls and other peculiar uses.

It should be noted that

• The Steinborg specimen is arguably not modern English, but Anglo-Saxon;

• The Ilbereth specimen – possibly an example of “Arctic” spelling – is not a genuine Middle-earth text, and furthermore printed quite indistinctly, so that it will hardly qualify for an analysis based on letter-shapes.

The Steinborg- and Ilbereth-texts are therefore excluded from the analysis.

The phonemic modes differ in the representation of vowels - as noted above - and the semivowels y and w. For y the long carrier is used, sometimes with a dot, sometimes without (this carrier also serves for schwa in the Treebeard-mode); for w the modes use the tengwa that looks like a cursive 2 (short or extended); the Ring-mode uses rómen, more frequently used for r. The aspirated sound in which (for those speakers that pronounce it differently from witch) is noted variously as inverted rómen or hwesta sindarinwa. Use of the schwa-dot, the tehtar for following y and w and the abbreviations seems to be common; these graphs are lacking only in those texts where there is no need for them. The use of one or the other s-curl seems to be dictated partly by the form of the tengwa to which it is attached.

The orthographic modes are coincident to a large extent concerning consonants and vowels, the only notable differences being the use of rómen sometimes for r and sometimes for w. The modes used for the three versions of the King’s Letter are even more similar, differing only in the use of lambe with a tilde inside the bow for ll in one of them, the forms of the s-curls, abbreviations for on and in (o and i with the nasal tilde) and the peculiar form of rómen, looking like an óre with an added bow, in Letter III.

CONCLUSION

Given these data, it would be idle to ask: "What mode would Tolkien be using today?", for we can be certain that he would maintain his well-known "contrasistency", and change modes according to what he judged to be more adequate at the moment of writing. What we may ask is: "What full tengwar mode for writing Modern English would Tolkien recognise, upon reading, as coherent, logically and historically fitting, and above all faithful to the spirit (if not to the letter - and this word is used advisedly!) of his sub-creation?". To this each can answer as she or he will; my own opinion is that we would be faithful to JRRT's most recent practice in employing a Treebeard-like mode (if writing phonemically) or a Letter-mode (if writing orthographically). The resulting modes would be similar to those pictured below.

Certur Harmatir (Ronald Kyrmse)

Version 3 - November 2003

The font employed for practically all tengwar in this analysis is Tengwar Elfica

PDF Versions: This Text / Table of Modes