© Ronald Kyrmse                                certur @ amonhen . com . br

THE GEOGRAPHICAL RELATION BETWEEN BELERIAND AND ERIADOR
 
Certur Harmatir (Ronald Kyrmse)
Published in Mallorn, the Journal of the Tolkien Society, No. 26 (September 1989)
 
 In what follows I shall try to achieve a concordance between two regions: Beleriand and adjacent lands on one hand, and the north-west of Middle-earth after the drowning of Beleriand (mainly Eriador) on the other. My main sources of cartographic information are two maps:
A. the second “Silmarillion” map in Appendix III to LR;
B. the map of the west of Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age in UT.

Map B agrees well with that in LotR as to scale; both are consistent with A, the only “Silmarillion” map with a useful scale indication  (the 50-mile squares). The same squares, although without any clue about scale, are also present and in good agreement on the first “Silmarillion” map in SoMe, as well as the latter’s west- and eastward extensions.

The proposed concordance between maps A and B is possible because of certain geographical features that appear on both:

The following passages from TB — chapter 14 “Of Beleriand and Its Realms” — give indications of distances, all consistent with A. Quotations in {} brackets are from the Quenta Silmarillion in LR — chapter 9 with the same name as above. A land league, let it be remembered, equals 3 statute miles, or 5,280 feet. The discrepancies in the width of Dorthonion and of West Beleriand are discussed by Christopher Tolkien in LR, where the earlier values are discounted as being ‘simple errors’. One possible explanation for the puzzling figure of 70 leagues given for West Beleriand ‘from river to sea’ is that the river in question is Narog, not Sirion — through some oversight, no doubt. The distance from the coast near Mount Taras to Narog just south of Ivrin is indeed some 200 miles.

The map I have constructed joining A and B uses the same numbering and lettering convention as A, extended south- and eastward. I have only sketched in some features appearing on neither A nor B:

I might of course have extended the map further southward and eastward beyond Fangorn and the issuing thence of Onodló, but I thought this would add little or nothing to our knowledge of the lands in question. My main interest lies in the mid-longitudes of the combined maps, where A and B are joined.

I find it not unfair to point out the disagreement between these measurements and the distance indications in Strachey’s Journeys of Frodo. She shows an east-west distance of over 372 miles between Hobbiton and Rivendell, which according to B should be about 440 miles. The north-south distance between Hobbiton and the outflow of Onodló — some 380 miles — furthermore appears on her maps as 250  miles. Thus, quite unaccountably in view of the cartographic evidence already present in LotR, her scale seems to be compressed by factors of about 85% in the east-west and 65% in the north-south directions.

Doubtless many refinements remain to be added to the present work, such as adjustments to the spherical shape of the earth and fixation of the latitudes — if not longitudes — involved. A point may be made for putting Hobbiton — and therefore Imladris as well — at about 50ºN, which agrees with the statement by J. R. R. Tolkien in UT — note 9 to The Disaster of the Gladden Fields:

Bibliography The Lord of the Rings, George Allen & Unwin, 1978; abbr. LotR
The Silmarillion, ed. Christopher Tolkien, George Allen & Unwin, 1977; abbr. TS
Unfinished Tales, ed. Christopher Tolkien, George Allen & Unwin, 1980; abbr. UT
The Shaping of Middle-earth, ed. Christopher Tolkien, George Allen & Unwin, 1986; abbr. SoMe
The Lost Road, ed. Christopher Tolkien, Unwin Hyman, 1987; abbr. LR Journeys of Frodo, Unwin Paperbacks, 1981
 
 

HOME 1