The text as you see is extremely clumsy as if
he describes the address for a lost person: Where-the-sun-goeth-down St.,
Canaanites’ City, leave the first plain of Moreh, right against Gilgal!
Sun Setting in Murky Water?
Refuting a repetitive missionary allegation
by Hesham Azmy
Published in Oct.,
29th, 2003
Although we keep answering accusations of Christian missionaries against our religion and Scripture, they vehemently keep parroting them again and again as if we have not answered them already!! Jesus is reported to have said,
We will show here that what is in their eye is not just a beam, but a big wedge! Well, among the issues whom Christian missionaries use to object against the Holy Qur’an is the following passage,
“They ask thee concerning Zul-Qarnain.
Say, I will rehearse to you something of his story. Verily we established
his power on earth, and we gave him the ways and the means to all ends.
One (such) way he followed. Until, when he reached the setting of the sun,
he
found it set in a spring of murky water: near it he found a people.”
(Holy Qur’an 18:83-86)
Their objection is that how sun could set in a spring of murky water while it is over billion times greater than earth and can never set in a spring of a murky water! They persistently confront us with this objection in all their arguments concerning scientific aspects of the Qur’an.
Well, we are going, insha’Allah, to answer them. I begin and quote the following biblical verse,
“Are they not on the other side Jordan,
by
the way where the sun goeth down, in the land of the Canaanites,
which dwell in the champaign over against Gilgal, beside the plains of
Moreh?”
(Deuteronomy 11:30)
As we all know there is no way where the sun goes down because the sun is over billion times greater than earth … etc.. while if the meaning is that it is the way where it appears to people that sun goes down in, the objection will be solved. But certainly they accept such explanations for their Scripture, not for ours! Moreover, the verse is very clumsy as one of our Arab brothers notes ,
The text as you see is extremely clumsy as if
he describes the address for a lost person: Where-the-sun-goeth-down St.,
Canaanites’ City, leave the first plain of Moreh, right against Gilgal!
Let’s move on to another verse,
“The sun shall not smite thee by day,
nor
the moon by night.”
(Psalms 121:6)
We quite understand what is meant by the sun smiting someone, but what is meant by moon smiting?! Is there anything known - for example - as moon stroke?! Perhaps we should knnow!
Our last biblical quotation is this,
“And there appeared a great wonder in
heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and
the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars.”
(Revelation 12:1)
How can a woman be clothed with the sun which is over billion times greater than earth?!! This is indeed mythical!
Now, we leave the Bible to discuss the objection of the missionaries. The verse says, “he found it set in a spring of murky water” i.e., according to his vision and sight that’s why Allah does not say “it is setting”. Imam Al-Baidawi notes,
He probably reached shore of the ocean and saw it like that because there was but water at the furthest of his sight that’s why He says “he found it set” and does not say “it sets”.Imam Al-Qurtubi states,
(Al-Baidawi, Anwar-ut-Tanzil wa Asrar-ut-Taw’il, Volume 3, page 394. Published by Dar-ul-Ashraf, Cairo, Egypt)
Al-Qaffal said: It is not meant by reaching the rising or setting of the sun that he reached its body and touched it because it runs in the sky around the earth without touching it and it is too great to enter any spring on earth. It is so much larger than earth. But it is meant that he reached the end of populated land east and west, so he found it - according to his vision - setting in a spring of a murky water like we watch it in smooth land as if it enters inside the land. That is why He said, "he found it rising on a people for whom we had provided no covering protection against the sun." (Holy Qur'ân 18:90) and did not mean that it touches or adheres to them; but they are the first to rise on.Imam Fakhr-ud-Deen Ar-Razi states,Al-Qutabiy said: Probably this spring is a part of the sea and the sun sets behind, with or at it, so the proposition takes the place of an adjective and Allah knows best.
(Al-Qurtubi, Al-Game’ le Ahkam-el-Qur’an, Volume 16, page 47. Published by Dar-ul-Hadith, Cairo, Egypt. ISBN 977-5227-44-5)
When Zul-Qarnain reached the furthest west and no populated land was left, he found the sun as if it sets in a dark spring, but it is not in reality. The same when sea traveler sees the sun as if it sets in the sea if he cannot see the shore while in reality it sets behind the sea.Imam Ibn Kathir states,
(Ar-Razi, At-Tafsir-ul-Kabir, Volume 21, page 166)
“Until, when he reached the setting of the sun" means he followed a certain way till he reached the furthest land he could go from the west. As for reaching the setting of the sun in the sky, it is impossible. What narrators and story tellers say about that he walked for a period of time in earth while the sun was setting behind him is unreal, and most of it is from myths of People of the Book and inventions of their liars.I believe this is adequate to refute the missionaries' imposed interpretation. And to Allah is the Judgement in all affairs."he found it set in a spring of murky water" means he saw the sun according to his vision setting in the ocean and this is the same with everyone ending to the shore seeing as if the sun sets inside it (i.e. the ocean).
(Ibn Kathir, Tafsir-ul-Qur'ân Al-'Azim, Volume 5, page 120. Published by Maktabat-ul-Iman, Mansoura, Egypt)