England's actor of the 70's: Malcolm McDowell by Scott MacDonough

    Until recently, the best kept secret in the movie industry was that one of the few authentically great actors of our generation is a quiet, private, publicity-shy and unactorish English gentleman of 28 named Malcolm McDowell.
    If you've never heard of him, that's understandable. His first film - Lindsay Anderson's if.... - was a recognized masterpiece but a less-than-smashing box office success in America. His second, Joseph Losey's tauntingly ambiguous Figures in a Landscape, was shelved for a year, finally given a trial run in New York City, yanked after 5 days, and consigned to oblivion.
    Then, in October, Bryan Forbes' Long Ago Tomorrow (entitled The Raging Moon in England) was released in the U.S. and immediately had New York's super snide critics and audiences spinning cartwheels around both the movie and its astoundingly empathic male lead. In addition, McDowell plays the focal role in Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, the most fanatically anticipated movie of this or any year.
    "He's not really handsome, is he?" squawked a voice in the lobby after a packed Friday night showing of Long Ago Tomorrow. He isn't, actually. But he owns the most striking facial geography and engaging personality of any actor around. Piercing eyes the color of blue shadows on midnight snow. A prominent spread-out nose. A shag-cut crop of light brown hair. Elastic lips that curl either upwards into a warming smile or downwards into a defiant glare. A droll sense of humor. Abrasive intelligence. Courtly manners, in an era when common courtesy is no longer common.
    During a brief stay in New York to promote his new films, McDowell moves around his hotel room like a polite, penned-up fox, taking long thoughtful draws on British cigarettes and implying an instinctive wariness of the press.
    "It's very difficult to talk about your own performance," he says. "There's really nothing to say. It's up there, and either you like it or you don't. It's actually quite difficult to do publicity. The interview is only good as the interviewer. If you get a good reporter, it's very pleasant, but most of the time you get some dumb woman who wants to know if you like blondes or brunettes. It's curious, I met an actor in the lobby who was on the phone with his girlfriend, and he slammed up and ran over and said: 'I saw your movie five times, and I've been studying acting for four years. Now, can you give me any advice?' Of course, I couldn't. He said; 'Well, what kind of method do you use?' I said: Method? I don't know. I just do it. There's no method.' It's really weird, American actors are very into all these classes, methods and theories, which would really confuse me, would totally destroy anything that I have. I'm sure. I think it destroys a lot of them."
    But McDowell doesn't go along with the maxim that British actors are superior to Americans. "I think that Jon Voight is a brilliant actor, he's really a star. I didn't particularly like Midnight Cowboy, but his performance was remarkable. Jon has a problem in knowing what parts to choose, which we all have. It's 50% of the job. I haven't worked for a year because there's nothing that I want to do. In the end, it got so bad that the next movie I'm going to do---it's with Lindsay Anderson again---I wrote it myself because there's nothing around. You've got to go out and find the people you want to work with because they're not necessarily going to come to you."
    Staring through the 19th floor window at an autumnal view of Central Park, McDowell shucks off his meet-the-press jacket and, looking considerably more comfortable in a white-dotted dark shirt tucked into brown bell-bottoms, relaxes in an easy chair and dryly recounts how Kubrick nudged him into A Clockwork Orange two years ago.
    "I'd just changed my agent, and Kubrick was trying to get hold of me for a week. He finally did and said, "Gee, Malc, your agent nearly blew the job.' Apparently, my ex-agent was saying, 'Yes, we do handle him but he's out of the country at the moment and as soon as he gets back . . .' Anyway, Stanley asked me to come and see him, which I did, and he gave me this little book to read. He never mentioned the film, he just said, 'By the way, would you like to read this book?' I read the book three times, phoned him back and said: 'I thought the book was brilliant." And he said: 'Oh, I'm very pleased to hear it, I think it's brilliant as well.' And I said, 'Can we talk about it again?' He never asked me if I'd like to do it, so I really didn't know what to say. Finally, I said, 'Can you come to my house tomorrow to talk about it?', not knowing, of course, that Kubrick never leaves his house for anybody! It was pure innocence on my part. Anyway, he turned up, I saw him walking up the street. Apparently, he parked his car way down the block because he couldn't find my house, so he decided to walk. He arrived, we started talking about the book, and I said to him, 'Are you offering me the role, Stanley?' He answered, 'Oh, gee...well...I wouldn't be wasting my time if I wasn't offering you the role.' So I said: 'Okay, I accept!'
    With a puckish beam, he continues: "That was in January, 1970. From January to the shooting date in September, I worked with Stanley on costumes and makeup, we played ping-pong, I got to know him. Then we shot the film, which we finished last March. It was an experience. I don't think the making of any film is a 'good' experience, especially when you're actually doing it. In retrospect, I suppose it was a great experience. I've seen the whole film twice. It's interesting," he smiles, enigmatically.
    Since McDowell projects on film an unlikely blend of primeval arrogance and youthful compassion, as if Heathcliff had met and melded with Peter Pan, the role of Alex (the savage teen-aged leader of a futuristic revolt who is seized and lobotomized into a piteous robot) seems tailor-made. But, in the past, nearly every actor appearing in a Kubrick movie has been eclipsed by the mystique surrounding the legendary director. When the whole world reverently awaits The New Kubrick Film, nobody much notices the actors.
    "That's true," he admits, "but it's different this time. I'll tell you why: It's a different kind of role than the spaceman in 2001 or, indeed, the 4 or 5 roles that Peter Sellers did in Strangelove. It's a different kind of film for Stanley to do in that it relies totally on the central character. That is why I think he was very concerned with the actor-director relationship. It's an incredible part. I doubt if I'll ever play a role quite like it again...I do think film is totally a director's medium. The actor can bring a lot to it. But, initially, it's the director's film, it's his conception, and you have to work with good directors. I don't mean to say I wouldn't work with an unknown director, but I've never yet met one whom I found interesting enough or believed in enough."
    One extremely "known" director McDowell would never work with is Ken Russell. "To be honest, I really don't like Ken Russell's movies, though I loved his television work. His Isadora Duncan was much better than the movie. Let me put it this way: if he sent me a script, I'd read it but I know I'd be, maybe wrongly, biased when I read it. I don't think he'd ask me to work with him anyway, because I'm not his kind of actor. He doesn't particularly like actors, and he uses them like machinery or like props, bits of furniture, which is not interesting to me. In Sunday, Bloody Sunday Glenda Jackson is a much better actress than she could ever show with Russell."
    In Long Ago Tomorrow, a love story for people who hated Love Story. McDowell portrays a surly, snotty, loudmouthed lad who, suddenly struck down by paralysis, lands in a home for cripples where his love for another resident named Jill (played by Nanette Newman, Bryan Forbes' wife) transforms him into a tough, tender, torn-apart but invincible young man. It's a nearly impossible part for an actor to bring off, and would-be actors who want to know what acting's all about would be well-advised to stop fidgeting over methods and simply study the next-to-last scene, where McDowell, driven back to the home after learning that Jill has died in a hospital, blurts out to a sympathetic nurse (Georgia Brown) that "I've pissed myself."
    "I didn't know how to play that scene," he admits. "It just...happened. It's quite a line to do. Fortunately, everything seemed to work in that scene because Georgia, who is remarkably good in it, started to cry, which was marvelous for me. I wanted to laugh, I just wanted to get hysterical. Then I thought, no, maybe I shouldn't do that. But I felt in a way that I should laugh because of the horribly ridiculous situation I was in. The whole thing about the movie for me was to play down, to give it a kind of vitality but in a hidden sense, not to overdo it in any way, but to keep it going against the norm. It would have been very easy to cry, it would have been moving for me to have cried, but I didn't want to cry. In the end shot where I'm playing table tennis, I wanted to smash that ball, smash it anywhere, SMASH it out of the room. That's what I insisted should happen. There was no other ending for me.
    "I really loved the character. I thought he had something to say that I would like to do. I found meeting paraplegics in hospitals and homes very depressing. To be quite honest, I didn't do the role because I wanted to bring the cause of the paraplegic to the public notice. It was a good part, and I wanted to play it. The reason, mainly, was because it was virile, young, ballsy kind of character who meets a disaster in his life and becomes very withdrawn, very bitter, and then finds, through love, a way to live. That appealed to me a lot, because when the character meets the girl in the home, he really finds something---a level of relationship---that he would never have found had he not been struck down by paralysis. It's strange, but only in becoming disabled does he become emotionally whole. I can't pretend that I did it because it was a film about paraplegics and that I was fighting a cause for them although, incidentally, I do believe the film does that because it shows them as real people, how they can be depressed and cynical and funny.
    "Bryan did a very, very remarkable job in the film. He did it with taste. Also, there was no sentimentality, the character was certainly not sentimental, he was hard as nails. And what I especially liked was that even at the end, when Jill dies, you know that this guy is saved, he's going to make it anyway, whatever happens. They could knock his head off, and he'd still come back as a fighter.
    "Nanette was exceptionally good, she's marvelous, it's the best performance she's ever given in her life. And I'm very pleased because when we started shooting, everyone was saying, 'Oh, Bryan...nepotism...with his wife...'But actually she was---well, there's nothing else to say---she was really terrific. She was also lovely to work with."
    As a teenager in the north of England, McDowell never intended to be an actor, "I really didn't know what I wanted to do. I guess I always would have wound up being an actor by fair or foul means. I was lucky that it happened so quickly after I left school."
    School was a private academy in Kent. "I didn't enjoy it at first, but when you begin to get privileges and become a senior boy, it's a pleasant sort of existence---not much work to do, a little cricket, a little Rugger, everyone else lackeys around for you. But that was after six years of sheer hell. The English school systems are psychologically very well planned because you have six years of hell and one year of absolute bliss, and so you come away thinking---Wow! My school days were great!"
    Upon graduation, he got a job as a coffee salesman in Yorkshire. "I used to go out and sell these beans to mental homes, nuclear power stations, any institution that had masses of coffee-drinking people. I worked for an American company, Chase and Sanborn, and I was pretty successful. I sold a lot of coffee," he laughs. "I think they just took pity on me because I looked so young.
    "I had a girlfriend in Liverpool who every Friday night used to go to an elocution class. I went along once to see what was happening and thought it was very boring. But the woman who ran the class, Mrs. Harold Ackley, who was 82, said that I was to come to her privately, which I did, and I quite enjoyed it. We used to do these bits from various plays. She said I should take these acting examinations, and I did." As a result, McDowell was hired by the manager of a repertoire theatre on the Isle of Wight. "I did 9 months of that, at 8 pounds a week, and it was just terrifying. I had to play every kind of role, from 12-year-olds to 45-year olds. We were a company of seven; a leading man, a leading lady, a male juve (which is what I was), a female juve, and a couple of extra bodies. From there, I went to another repertoire company in the south of England in Devon.
    "And then," he frowns, "I went to the Royal Shakespeare Company at Stratford, which was really rock bottom. It's a monstrous place, and I hated it, hated it, absolutely LOATHED it! It's the worst theatre in the whole of the world. The standard is really appalling, and it's only because of idiotic American tourists that they keep the thing going at all. Nobody else would go to see that crap! It's only because it's at Stratford, and people think it's great because it's Shakespeare, so they're pulling in these poor souls. It took me two years to get over that experience. I started out by walking onstage with a spear, and then I played small roles. I don't really regret it because now I know what it's like, but I wouldn't advise anybody to go there unless they want a lot of punishment. I guess, in fact, it did play a very important function in my life because you were supposed to be overawed by all this great talent. But after a week you realize it's all crap, so you get a little rebellious and then get into a lot of trouble, which is what I managed to do. I used to say, 'this is just crap, why are we doing this?' and I would ask questions, which was really taken amiss. That wasn't a very polite thing to do. Anyway, I had to leave... I was out of work for a long time, and then I started to do quite a lot of television. I was in a series, which was really appalling. It was a thing called Sat'day While Sunday, a view of young people's lives in the north of England. A real disaster, but it was a good thing for me to do because I had to churn out a half-hour's performance in 4 days. I guess that teaches you something, but I'm not quite sure what."
    He also performed at the Royal Court ("which I liked because it's a bit tatty; I suppose they really care about what they do, although what they do is terrible, but at least there's no pretension about it, not like Stratford"), and eventually made his film debut, which wound up on the cutting room floor. "I did one day in Poor Cow, in which I made love to Carol White. I had no idea what the role was, I never read the script. It was an interior scene, and it had been raining, so every time I came into this ruddy place they drenched me with a watering can. It wasn't great fun. Then they couldn't match the exterior because they never got any more rain after that, so they cut it all out. That was the end of my movie career for a few months."
    Finally, the casting director for if.... who remembered McDowell from an appearance on a TV soap opera, summoned him to meet the director, Lindsay Anderson. "Frankly, I'd never heard of him. We just got on well, and then he cast me. I got on very well with him during the shooting of the film, and he's become a very good friend of mine. He doesn't do many films either, simply because he has to find his subject and nobody really writes what he wants to do. It has to be his conception. He's a brilliant, remarkable man. He's sort of my mentor. I never met a good director until I met Lindsay. I didn't even think they existed. I thought it was all luck. Actually, there are very few good directors, and very few people you can trust, which is why I don't work very much."
    Since if... McDowell has spent a good deal of his time rejecting reams of scripts with no regrets. "I'm very pleased if the stuff that I've turned down works out well, and a lot of it has, in fact. But I would never talk about it - unlike some people I know - because I feel it's really unfair to the actor who does it and also to the film. I really do get offered a lot of crap, unbelievable stuff. In fact, I don't think I've actually gotten through a script that I've been offered in the last year. I haven't even got to the end. You can just sort of tell.
    There are people like Michael Caine, who has done any good movie he can do. I don't think it's a good idea. I know that I can't do that. Maybe I'd like to earn a million dollars in a year, but I couldn't physically do three films a year. It would be impossible for me to do that, because I don't think that a film starts and ends on the first and last day of shooting. Usually, I find that a picture is going to take up at least a year---on the preparation, on the shooting, on the aftermath. I finished Long Ago Tomorrow 18 months ago but I'm still with it. And certainly, I'm still with A Clockwork Orange and will be for a long, long time. To be fair, people do make mistakes. They should make mistakes, and they should be allowed to make mistakes. You've just got to try and minimize the chances, that's all."
    Accordingly, McDowell himself conceived his next film, O Lucky Man!, which will begin filming in March and is a collaborative effort with two people he trusts---Lindsay Anderson and scenarist David Sherwin, who wrote if . . . The concept stems from McDowell's experiences as a coffee salesman, peddling Chase and Sanborn "beans" throughout Northern England. To begin with, "I just wrote scenes, I didn't try to put them together or in any sequence. Then David read these scenes, and he loved them. I realized that I didn't just want to write a comedy about a salesman selling coffee. That's why I needed David and Lindsay to turn it into something else. When David was writing if . . .which was then called The Crusaders, he was writing about a boy's school. Now when Lindsay came in on the collaboration of the script, it turned out to be a film about, well, what was if . . . about? It's not about a boy's school, anyway, although that's used as a vehicle. It's the same thing with this film---the coffee salesman is a vehicle. When I showed the bits I'd written to Lindsay, he thought they were pretty poor, which I expected, and he told me to go and read Voltaire's 'Candide' and Kafka's 'Amerika', and that was very good advice. It's impossible to tell you what the film's about, except that it will be done in an even more epic style than If . . . and the theme is a journey through life to success."
    Stubbing out a cigarette, and sipping a dry vermouth and soda, McDowell seems anxious to abandon his claustrophobic hotel suite and return home to London, where "I keep to myself, I never go out, I never 'do the scene.' I don't think one should expose oneself to the media. A lot of people can take a leaf out of Stanley Kubrick's book on this question. I don't mean when you come to sell a film, which is after all why I'm here. I would never do an interview unless it was to talk about a particular film. I would never do anything for personal publicity, because I think then people are out to get you. Stanley really has it buttoned up, because getting an interview with him is like getting into heaven. It's difficult. Stanley prefers to keep he myth going, which is really what the President should have done. He should have kicked all the TV cameras out of the White House, and he would have been better off today. The people now know he's just an ordinary man who makes mistakes, and that can---and certainly has---worked against him.
    I quite liked people not knowing who I am because when you're a celebrity like Jack Nicholson, that has its problems. Actually, you're still the same person, you're still doing the same things, but you've only got the added pressures. I don't think I'll ever be like Nicholson, because I don't really want to be. Yes, sure, I do think A Clockwork Orange is going to be a big movie and probably financially and publicity-wise the biggest I'll ever do. But I'll come over here, when it opens, for two weeks, and then I'll go home, and that will be the end of that. Then I'll start working on Lindsay's film, and you won't hear of me for another two years, which is the way I like it. That suits me fine, though I do hope it's not another year before I start working after Lindsay's film. It's been a year, you see, since Clockwork Orange, that I haven't made a film. But I enjoy doing nothing. I don't feel guilty about it, so I'm happy. In fact, I'm not really doing nothing, I'm very busy, thinking, so it's a very useful time. And yet people say, 'You're not working.' But then, they can say what they like. It doesn't really matter."
    Nowadays, when 9 out of 10 actors grab the loot and run, Malcolm McDowell walks, slowly. Despite his composed tones, it is evident that he cares, agonizes about his movies. Which is what makes certain movies, and certain movie actors, matter. "In my way of working, you don't end up by making a lot of money. But," he adds, with a singular McDowell smile, "you end up reasonably happy."

© Show Magazine January 1972
Archived 2001-08 Alex D. Thrawn for www.MalcolmMcDowell.net

1