Philippines Trip 2002
Prologue | Gumaca |
Unisan | Tubas |
Manila | Puerto Galera |
Back To Manila
-To Contact Us-
Excepts from editorial against American intervention
from the Philippine Daily Inquirer by Conrado de Quiros
It took five decades for this country to rid itself of American military presence.
It took President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo just one year to bring it back.
...That puts us right back where we began, to the days of American troops and not very
unlikely American fighter planes and warships. Salonga himself warns that the
Americans are not going to leave even after the Abu Sayyaf is routed. That is not
what they are here for.
...Why? Because of a small band of kidnappers who happened to have taken a couple of
American hostages? The AFP reckons the Abu Sayyaf is down to only about a hundred
armed men, as a result of demoralization, defection and decimation. You need American
troops to deal with something like that? And as Father Nacorda et al. have revealed,
the only reason the Abu Sayyaf continues to thrive is that the AFP has made them
junior partners in the lucrative kidnap industry. Yes, junior: the Abu Sayyaf does
all the work while the generals just sit back and get their cut.
Which brings me to one truly bizarre argument I've heard over the past week. We need
the foreign troops, says one, precisely because our AFP cannot be counted upon to do
the job. The exact parallel of that argument is saying that we must arm the populace
because the cops are useless in preventing crime. Which is an argument for jumping
from the frying pan into the fire. The cops are useless, abolish the PNP, don't turn
the country into a wild, wild West. The AFP is useless, abolish the AFP, don't turn
the country back into a colony.
I've always said that America's war against terrorism won't remain a reason to punish
the people responsible for Sept. 11, it will turn into an excuse to push American global
policy more aggressively than ever before. American media and popular culture have
already been furiously preparing the ground for it, a spate of Hollywood movies
offering blithe moral underpinnings for American action in foreign soil. The presence
of American troops in Basilan proves it. The United States had been eyeing the coast
of Dadiangas as a replacement for Subic long before Sept. 11. Wearing the mantle
of the war against terrorism, it should find every excuse, or pressure point, to get
it. Salonga is right: Those troops aren't likely to disappear along with the Abu
Sayyaf.
Unless we protest it, of course. Which brings us back to Ms Macapagal's monumental
perfidy. This country spent much blood, sweat and tears trying to rid itself of
American military presence, the one thing that has debilitated us more than anything
else in the world. And whose monstrous effects are visible in the toxic wastes the
Americans left behind in Clark and Subic. I do most earnestly propose that she put
up an alternative presidential residence in the areas in Clark where the toxic wastes
are, in solidarity with her fellow Kapampagans. ...
It took Claro M. Recto, Lorenzo Tanada and Jose W. Diokno a lifetime of struggle to
rid this land of its greatest plague, which was the presence of foreign troops on its
soil. It has taken President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo one moment of whim to bring it
back.
She has much to answer for.
To return to the previous page, either use the Back browser button or select this
link.
To go to www.travel-library.com
|