THE US REGIME'S LINE ON IRAQ KEEPS CHANGING


 

War Rationale: Version 10.0

         P.J. Crowley is senior fellow and director of national defense and homeland security and Robert O. Boorstin is senior vice president of national security at the Center for American Progress

         In the year since the invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration has repeatedly shifted its justification for going to war and constantly changed its story on intelligence, the United Nations, reconstruction, political transition and the cost to the American taxpayer. More than anything, the administration's war in Iraq resembles a software program that, at first, works brilliantly, but then catches the user in a cycle of "fatal error" messages.
         Here then, in Silicon Valley terms, is a review of the Bush administration's year in Iraq:

Saddam Hussein poses an 'imminent threat' to the American people.

          Version 1.0 - Saddam Hussein is an imminent threat
          Version 1.01 - Saddam Hussein is a gathering threat
          Version 1.02 - Saddam Hussein poses a real and dangerous threat
          Version 1.1 - The smoking gun will be a mushroom cloud
          Version 1.2 - We can't afford to wait
          Version 1.3 - We never said imminent
          Version 1.3.1 - OK, maybe we did say it once or twice
          Version 1.4 - We should have been more precise

Saddam Hussein is ready to use weapons of mass destruction.

          Version 2.1 - Saddam has weapons of mass destruction
          Version 2.2 - Saddam has nuclear weapons
          Version 2.3 - Saddam has biological agents he's never accounted for
          Version 2.3.1 - The trailers are mobile labs for producing chemical weapons
          Version 2.3.2 - Unmanned aircraft are ready to spread Saddam's biological weapons
          Version 2.4 - Saddam's going to make more of all these weapons
          Version 2.5 - We all know where the weapons are
          Version 2.5.1 - Well, Saddam has used weapons of mass destruction
          Version 2.5.2 - Iraq is a big country. We'll find the weapons eventually.
          Version 2.5.3 - Saddam had weapons of mass destruction programs
          Version 2.5.4 - Saddam had "weapons of mass destruction program-related activities"
          Version 2.5.5 - David Kay? Who's David Kay?
          Version 2.6 - It's not about misleading the American people—Saddam Hussein is gone and that's the most important thing

The intelligence is clear.

          Version 3.0 - We based our statements on our available intelligence
          Version 3.1 - Saddam tried to buy uranium ore in Niger
          Version 3.1.2 - Well, that was what the British told us
          Version 3.1.3 - Did we tell you about Joe Wilson's wife?
          Version 3.1.4 - Do you know a good lawyer?
          Version 3.2 - The intelligence is absolutely clear
          Version 3.2.1 - Intelligence is never 100 percent certain
          Version 3.2.2 - We didn't manipulate the intelligence
          Version 3.3 - There was no consensus within the intelligence community
          Version 3.3.1 - We saw the same intelligence the last administration did

Saddam Hussein has deep ties to Al Qaeda.

          Version 4.0 - Saddam has long-standing ties to Al Qaeda
          Version 4.0.1 - You can't distinguish between Saddam and Al Qaeda
          Version 4.0.2 - There is an Al Qaeda terrorist network in Iraq
          Version 4.0.3 - Saddam has provided Al Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons training.
          Version 4.0.4 - Saddam will give his weapons to Al Qaeda
          Version 4.0.5 - Colin Powell: I have not seen smoking-gun, concrete evidence about the connection [between Al Qaeda and Iraq]
          Version 4.0.6 - Vice President Cheney: I still believe there's a connection.
          Version 4.0.7 - CIA Director George Tenet: I told Dick not to say that.

The United Nations just can't handle this.

          Version 5.0 - The UN had 12 years to deal with this
          Version 5.1 - We don't trust the UN to handle this
          Version 5.1.1 - We don't need the UN's help
          Version 5.1.2 - The UN should play a vital, but not central role
          Version 5.1.3 - You there, UN, tell Ayatollah Sistani that elections aren't possible
          Version 5.1.4 - UN, please oversee the election process
          Version 5.1.5 - Pretty please? We'll pay our dues

The war in Iraq won't hurt our efforts in Afghanistan or the hunt for bin Laden.

          Version 6.0 - Iraq won't affect our hunt for bin Laden
          Version 6.1 - Assets have been moved from Afghanistan to Iraq
          Version 6.1.1 - Assets are being returned to Afghanistan
          Version 6.2 - We're mounting a spring offensive against bin Laden
          Version 6.2.1 - We'll catch bin Laden this year
          Version 6.2.2 - We hope to catch bin Laden this year
          Version 6.3 - Even if we catch bin Laden, the threat will still exist.

Mission accomplished.

          Version 7.0 - We won't need hundreds of thousands of troops—that's wildly off the mark
          Version 7.1 - Mission accomplished
          Version 7.1.1 - We'll stay as long as needed and not one day more
          Version 7.1.2 - The troops will be home in six months
          Version 7.1.3 - The Iraqi Army will provide security
          Version 7.1.4 - Where's the Iraqi Army?
          Version 7.1.5 - We've disbanded the Iraqi Army
          Version 7.1.3 - The troops will stay a year and be replaced
          Version 7.2 - We're training the Iraqi army—Iraqification will work
          Version 7.2.1 - We don't need any more American troops
          Version 7.2.2 - Well, maybe we do
          Version 7.2.3 - We're keeping 30,000 more troops on active duty than were authorized
          Version 7.2.4 - We don't know if this increase in troops is a spike or a plateau
          Version 7.2.5 - We're establishing stop loss so troops can't leave
          Version 7.2.6 - The Army is planning multi-year rotations

The cost to the American taxpayer.

          Version 8.0 - Economic advisor Larry Lindsey: The war will cost $200 billion
          Version 8.0.1 - President Bush: You're fired!
          Version 8.1 - The war will pay for itself very quickly
          Version 8.1.1 - Iraqi oil revenue will pay for reconstruction
          Version 8.2 - Our allies will help us
          Version 8.3 - We'll pay for the war through supplementals
          Version 8.3.1 - Congress wouldn't let us put it in the budget
          Version 8.3.2 - Can we please have $87 billion?
          Version 8.3.3 - Well, we really can't calculate what it will cost...
          Version 8.3.4 - Well, maybe we can—$50 billion may be on the low side
          Version 8.3.5 - Ask us after November 2...

Democracy comes to Iraq.

          Version 9.0 - We will be greeted as liberators
          Version 9.0.1 - We'll establish democracy in Iraq
          Version 9.1 - We'll turn this back to the Iraqis quickly
          Version 9.1.1 - President Chalabi will be welcomed with open arms
          Version 9.1.2 - Well, not so fast—we're prohibiting political parties
          Version 9.2 - We have the November 15 agreement—it's unchangeable
          Version 9.2.1 - We will appoint a small governing council
          Version 9.2.2 - Well, maybe a larger one
          Version 9.3 - We don't favor elections
          Version 9.3.1 - Caucuses work in Iowa, why not Iraq?
          Version 9.3.2 - OK fine, we'll have elections
          Version 9.4 - We can't return sovereignty until there is a constitution
          Version 9.4.1 - Never mind, we'll turn over sovereignty first
          Version 9.4.2 - We need to return this to the Iraqis—How about June 30?
          Version 9.4.3 - We're still focused on elections—the ones on November 2

The bottom line.

          Version 10.0 - Trust us.   We know what we're doing
 

1 1